Professional Documents
Culture Documents
"Hearts and Hands" by O.Henry: Directions : Please Use
"Hearts and Hands" by O.Henry: Directions : Please Use
Henry
L8.5 Demonstrate understanding of figurative language, word relationships and nuances in word meanings.
RL.8.3 Analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character,
or provoke a decision.
RL.8.1 Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text.
Directions: Please use 3 different colored highlighters (one for each character in the chart below) and as you read
Hearts and Hands, highlight any information you learn about each character. Then complete the chart below.
Character
Physical
Characteristics and
Personality
Characters actions
quotes)
Miss Fairchild
Mr. Easton
-pretty
-fancy clothing
-rich
-was old friends with
Mr. Eastman
-thinks Mr. Eastman is a
marshall
-lovely smile
-rounded cheeks
-little grey gloved hands
-bold
-Frank countenance and
manner
-Handsomely dresses
-Handcuffed to another
Other man
Based on the characterization above what can you infer about the characters?
You can infer that Mr. Easton doesnt want to embarrass himself in front of Ms. Fairchild, so hes lying about being the
Marshall. You can also infer that the other man, who is actually the Marshall, is okay with Mr. Easton doing this. Its probably
because the other man finally found Mr. Easton, and he is going to jail for seven year, so hes okay that he wants to impress
the girl.
Explain the plot twist at the end of the story using text evidence:
At the plot twist at the end, you realized that the other man was actually the Marshall. The text states, Young! exclaimed the
you ever know an officer to handcuff a prisoner to his right hand? Since
most people are right-handed, you can guess that the Marshall probably is too. If the Marshall is right-handed, he would want
his right hand free. Mr. Easton handcuffed his right hand, so he wasnt the Marshall.
RL.8.1: Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences
drawn from the text.
Not Yet Meeting
Struggled to explain
what the text directly
says as well as the
meaning behind the
text. Did not identify
evidence from the text.
Approaching Standard
Explained what the text
directly says as well as the
meaning behind the text.
Identified evidence, but not
necessarily the strongest
evidence.
Meeting Standard
Explained what the text directly says as well as
the meaning behind the text. Identified the
evidence that most strongly supports this
analysis.
Exceeding Standard
Explained what the text directly says as well as
the meaning behind the text. Identified the
evidence that most strongly supports this
analysis AND proposed an argument for why this
is evidence is the strongest.
RL.8.3: Analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character, or
provoke a decision.
Not Yet Meeting
Approaching Standard
Meeting Standard
Exceeding Standard