Morate, Mabel, Enique Dusel, and Carlos A. Jéuepul els, Oo
Teniliny a Large: Latin Amerea a he Postoinia De
Bate: Dam, N.C: Dk University Pres, 2008,
Nelson, Diane M. Finger inthe Wound: Boy Plt in Quin:
‘centennial Guatemala, Berkeley: Univerty of Caloris
Pras, 1999.
Pe, Lig, ed. Memoria rebeldes contra oboe Paasantla
‘Daunbal TY Sortze'el Kul. Gaatemsl: AVANCSO, 2008
Ribeiro, Gustavo Lins. "Worl Anthropologce: Cosmopeltis fora
‘New Global Scenario in Anthropology” Critique of Anthro-
ology 2.4 (December 2006): 363-286
Sabine, Cals. Guatemala, a historia silenclada (1049-1080). 2
"Vals, Guatemala: Fondo de Cultura Econdmea, 2007
Sal, Edward. Culture cd rere. NewYork: Knol 999.
Sunnis, Javier Reseoldos del pasado: ennfictos cultures en so-
‘cidade postelonates. La Paz, Bolsa: Programa de In.
‘estgacn Estate en Bolivi, 2009.
Sol, David. Rigoberta Mencia the Story ofall Poor Guate-
‘malas Boulder: Westview 998.
‘Stot-Chinebila, Norma. Nuestra uoplas: Myjoree guaemalte-
‘ens del igo 2X. Guatemala: Agropucién de Mujeres Tierra
Viva, 1998,
‘Tonssig, Michael. Minesls and Alteriy. London: Rowtedge, 1988.
Tedlock, Dennis, ens, Popol Vuh: The Dfitve Eton of The
“Mayen Book of The Da of Life and Te Glories of Gods
‘and Kings, NewYork: Touchstone, 1096
Vineboum, Liss, “Holocaust Representation fom History to Post:
Memory” Web. Nd. .
‘Couse-Fornariosa Huston Foo Nave Bava
‘Ow Viouznce ano 3H ASE OF MibOKY
“racy Devine Gon
University of Miami
“Declare Our Colletive Death ad. hoy Us Al Right Here”
In Oetober 20:2, an Indigenous community! of some 170
poop, bang just bees ordered to vaeate thelr ancestral ft
the border stato Mato Grosso do Sul ang Beslge by agr-bush
‘ico theres tobe of nother clr re and sty pact
ios ease than onsen ire Set
mati ree at ey ye rines and eat farmers santan open ete tothe Bran Ministry
(of Juste. elt fom the ise
Wethe Gara! Kal rm lo Ka wie tine You
‘our istscand dedi dds, ads upon ering tthe
‘er four xpusony the deal ats init We ne
Sestand leary that he esison part the stration of
ene ofthe igenons pope. We went mnie
fvideat at ws have nal hops of ving with Sty a
‘toa lec om ou saint tery se Eno ey wll,
Sh great grncraests ave brie Conscious of hie Eine
Bi Speak te ulmination adie Feder unin Miry
ot i dadar the ode ful eval ab expan, Lt to
‘etre outlive death, antsy sal eght bere Weak.
‘hat ou del ur etnton- and that onsen se ae
{ors eto ig big hol nih oentomb our bod We
five nother oton This ior Baal unntmons don before
This etter was published onthe Interne, ain a mate of
ays, went rl gers the county and aroun! te word forcing
‘treatin fom the Broan Minty of Susie and the Rational
Indian Foundation (FUNAD—the sate’ ofa indigent bos,
‘which has never Been led by an indigenous pers and for nearly
five decades has mosty bowed down to eens vsatlons of ae
dligenousightsin ho nameof "progress and“development™ Dur
‘ngthe last decade of Worker’ Party ule th organization has boon
‘complicit in an onging series of ont-Native legislation intves
Sand modernization projets, key among them, tbe construction of
‘he thle Tages hydroteti dam nthe word otherwise known
sn Belo Monte, now urvdrway inthe Amazonian ste of ar
‘Accompanying the surge of pale indignation ower ths
letter andthe elective discovery, for many, of human tragedy
that as ben taking place in Mato Grosso do Sul and elsewbere)
‘noe lng before anyone bad an Internet connection, was the pd
proliferation of «trend involving thousands of people azo the
Aeniesing Sone ts ome (Ph at ey in hy
country and around the world: the adalon ofthe words “Guarani
aiovd to porcoal pros online —not unis thowe cd ot so
cial medi ike Onkat and Facebook. nother wards, a eallective
‘eacton tothe hortor ofthe open ter, people fom various places
fd walls fife some of whom had been intiately involved i
Indigenous fe and poles for decades, and others who had never,
ld them any attention whatsoever, added the "Guarani Kaiows
{other ova names ina gesture of profes sliary,
"Thar ate, ef eoure, many way ory to mak sense of the
letter apd tho pu eacion tf nd T cones to having deny
ised feingsabout te events of October 2012 and how the pce
Surrounding them have continued to payout since. Nevertheless,
toa longtime stent of indigens' polis end indigenous bistory
ndealturlprodution, two particu line of interpretation stand
‘ut: On the ane hand, we might lok this series of events as ust
fone nore example the Bran sates store comp inthe
trcusion of ite Native peoples frm the national eonamanity and
the national polity, andthe appropriation of Native sualteenity by
‘membersofthe dominant majority fr polialendsthat are mosly
invlae to Native lives or veloc This poition would old
lagi ew one certainly earroborted by the past—butal, pets
‘ps, undelyeynieal one, On the ther hand, we ght aaead
shaasetoseethe unprecedented publ ottery ove the insti 0
Tong endured by Indigenous commontes of Mato Grosso do Sl
‘boat isdnoan pole snd “nies” ses or vanes ota
‘vert fn mite inert ety nr ad cece aa
‘Se (cps Bala and cde) Fo ty pupons, both rn faa
i Se a aera oft ts nda hea
oct dma rea easter
InedeSoua ina, Um gran dep Slo ars Vins eto,andthe widespread relatively newfoond public interest in work
ing in weys small ad laren suppor (or the very Testy no to
the detriment oftheir calctive wel being, es evidence of «new
«ta of national and transnational pole eonsiodsnes perp
‘yen social solar. Ther aromany reasons why, conigering he
‘lability of bat views Inthe lange historical an politi one
{extat hand, Top forthe second one: Not east ste noo sil
fac thatthe task of ehronieing slow and inevitable delet note
sarily posts the ations of tose working to avo ta ot wih.
‘Sutmeaning, imately hopeless, and ths alway lead ae
to and for isl In such an endelvor I wish perhaps unsurpes
ingly to ake no part.
othe, wat to make ofthis second possibility tbe pos-
bil that spite tremendous ods and great obstacles, a postin:
Agent polite i inaly onthe horn in Latin Amerc's ast
‘county, with @ national indigenous commanity competing Teas
than ote half ne percent ofthe overall Brerilon population of
Some 200 milion people? Let me back up and widen the sspe of
the sary ola out how we have atved at this moment, what
now at stake, and my sense mhalting and tentative one of what
'Wimight mean to people who find themes any thousands of
nls aa rom Mato Grosso do St My cations aswer shat i
‘ns todo with sovecelgnty, with the inherent vance of ts domi
‘ant forms, and with the nod to consider i ne In ight of eur
‘hard humanity indeed ~es we might be tempted to Bellew on
dav ays ike those of last Oetber 2012~ there i Ite ele that
‘we can share Indigenous peoples in Brarll and the Guarai-Kal=
‘in prticala emind ut once ain that the violent mans
Ustons of dominant sovereignty thresten ot only thei Lives and
lielioods but also the Integy of Brea silage democracy
[Naive engagemeats with that vnlenes now and i the pats for
‘sto question thse dominant fora, sx wel asthe ms freer
beng and reordng history —puricly, history tmagined
ational, to parphrise Anderson through whieh the coins
tobe privileged. The aesthetis of memory in contemporary Native
discourses of sovereignty shen, tsi, anessentally olitia
‘one that cannot be uiderstood independent tom how heres
inthe present
Undoing Indians Hegemony
Although it ame about inthe wake, over several years of
hundreds of deaths by suicide among young indigenous joope tn
Mato Grosso do Sul, the violent doclnation ofthe GuarentKaioe
vd open letter ~the promise of ras suilde— reversed atleast
‘hetorcaly, the uneven power relations hat have contribute to
the devastation of Native communities in Br ines the tenth
century. By placing charge of thle ses and desthe~ nto tht
‘own hands the eters authors dee quick attention toa sitation
of lang standing ets wl, tthe save tine, placing into ques
tion the whitewashed lore of benevolent colons und pace
rmisegenation that continues to inform and shape the ways domi
‘ant Brelian society peters wo imagine and porta se Indeed,
faced wi the endusingcancalty of romanticized "Ins in
dominant histories and cultural production, Native peoples have
far decades worked to counter eal and uefa ersutes of
‘the foundational velence that has maniplated thet bodies, es,
‘and images since wel before the delaratlon of national indepe
deacon 1822. From state-sponsored de-Inlanzation progam to
the ongoing “development ofthe Amazon, the ftion of Bras
ail democracy” has og manfred that lence, which ets
‘ona tlttered notion of tnenship that states Native peoples
forever on the threshald of national Belonging, as prospective ct
laersubjets who are inluded In the poly only by at of thei
Derpetul exon (Agamben, Home Sacer 18; State of Eesption
291). Ul the approval of the 1988 (poxtdieatorship) Conti
tion, it wasn ft, impossible for Naive peoples tobe bath Bre
jn and indigenous, or the proces of aches liens meant
“emancipation” tm the condition of one's "Indsnnes" md the
rights pertaining thereto ~peebaps most importantly, the ight to
liseon protected lands (Rats, ndigenism 80-81).
Although outed by generations of hypernatonslis, fn
sta governments aod representatives of thei oficial, ingest
apparato a. painstakingly pac enterprise’ real and ajbolc
‘ilence has aay inhered inthe stats profering of Brinnest, stippng nda nd groups targeted by such endeavors,
{Enotot th ives (rom dss of cont tht are nl ow bing
eam, of tive Pines nin ine Tat
themodfenzing disenrses and pices that have dodged Native
peoples the Guan Kaiowt rm theteore sine the ot
[aot Brant republican project have alo faction costly
thelaocte thes fom te present either by condemning them 0
“Srcal utopias” of precolonisl esa (Varsa oa) or by ro
Jecting the in fant fates of de-inlaized, mest oneness
{hat ate sll fentimesinvoed asthe “Bra race” Whether
Felegnted tothe pst an ts halts of “authenticity” o placed on
thet tek to tna Belonging and neo rwsannes then,
selcentiping ivigenous peoples have found the presomahy
Simple venture of belng once and inhabiting the preset tobe ah,
‘usperatngy elaive gol
Ti cast ths displaces, oth tsporal snd ply
cal Bras most recent national census revealed a remartale and
Wntroveril estoy nthe growth ofthe fal ingens om
tintin: over the course of neal two decades, from 193 to 2010,
{he numberof indigenous peoples across the county climbed fom
ome 306,000 nds o 896,617 an Inte of ver 290%"
‘White the expansions for ths ncesse vary wid and are aden
‘ith confetng pola motives possble ate uch
TTemendoos provi to reproduction lone, Chang perceptions of
Indigent, sate legaton with regard to rac and ee dao
Sifction, afrmative action poles, and, perhaps most signi
an, a posites for sldenifestion among oss
{faye bores tad teens npc The cosoquners of
{hese changes for particular communes andthe national Nati
population ea wale have ben mixed. On the one han, dat
aby increasing population numbers and the recent bom in social
ted have caulessd to heighten aarenes of indigenous popes
Sndsome oftheir major, colecive coer fom eduoton and
bent eae to intelectual propery sgh, land tentre, and env
Conner Foundtlonal stk fom Nate Beall | 95,
ronmental protetion— among cil society nd the national and
Internationa! media. On the eer band, the state's lets devel
opmental ssl along witha heightened eompetiton for pubic
"sour, mean that non-traditional Native peoples, and particu
Tal howe residing nanan ares, ar nrensngy wet sr
tiny by seltappointl guardians of sutheniey”
Thus faced with formidable networcf colonialist power —
both naittoneland and afrmal~ Native inlets and ete
‘ss have had to act simultaneously on personal and pltcal rents
to square two central arguments that might appear ireconleble
at fee valu: Fis, tat within present-day articulations of indie
ene there fan instrumental Kentifetnn and contin with
the pas. Ad scond, hat presen Sndigenely Is neler fed
in nor orient tusand the pst, ut ral, orwar-looking and
‘well rtd at navigating the exigencies of“progres” For wer
‘and educator Juvena Payay(emang others), thes wo clas are
Inextreale, frase pts "[Resogoirng our clara egies
the st stop [wel indigenous peoples need to tae in crdor to Keep
fon existing” (39). Countering the old ingens desire to rupture
[Native links toa ellctive story and earl ditional formas of
‘ie and shought,Payayé makes it clea that there sno way forward
for Natve peoples as such inthe absence of thie Hinks and those
forms, feral dominant coneetionsofine and oedema Dina
"esc self and Other function pooely aif’ chle organizing prin
dps fr those whose foremost ways belng and knowing ae, to
the contzary, and according to Daniol Munduruly, “hoist, eae
Jat, and] intoyral CA corrupt do conhesimiento ancestral” 29).
‘Comprising fraction ofthe Breen pepulton, itil.
ly absent fom lea, state, and natonal governing bes, lacking
roaming neces to puble institutions tnd mds of easton,
and lealy sujet tothe tutlary power ofan indigent apparatas
‘Hat even inthe ay century is headed by non-Natves? Beal's n+
Saari ate
Pirasfaemn steele byteAlgo pope tae df cane of nce sores
fo, selreprentation inthe public sphere. These coud
tales hinder communist nt oly wit the no igen
Ina, whos expemae to Native peoples sds aloes
inl pr om combination of tenses ton and
Glo 1, bat els among nds of indigcnos pecs
speak: hundreds of diferent ngage” and ee sped ca ove
‘she and ders national etry tat puns fom te son
leat yin the eres (So Paulette outenmst acco
the Amazonian valforest (BCE, Conn demoynfc aro)
light of ch ealenge, thea of Portuuece anf
Signo hg te predation snd Gawain fd
‘eee forms of Nate eal! produto production thst anges
‘om las, ne media ad journai oreate wings
‘ship andthe tudst indy" have become nape to
ike soa ed ar ‘Staite ey one
Hepes ou of eh ra devi Foe eet
‘incl ox moka? Gees acne a eee
‘eri 1, tng te prope as made i ot, cig
Inno eos cerwse On thin wisn casera
‘he nation-wide Bran indigenous movement at the projest
‘eal rresentation tore general. Uniting macho his ders
body of work isn plitld actheis of memory —somelines
‘ndvdual, oftentimes collective thet grounds the production of
‘counte-oundational national histories by intereting indigenous
Dlalosophios, clara prctes, and remembrances into render
Ing of the pst tht ate stil hv burdened by Indians roman
Ulam an is erasures and denial of the foundational lence of
‘dominant sovereleny
Including through Betusion
Like the Guareni-Kaiowd, longtime indigenous activist
IM. Mareoe Tereon bi rom the border este of Bato Grosso do
Sil here in 1954 he was bor into a commit (eee) elle
‘Tanay" He entered the puble sphere in the late seventies as a
founding member of the Union of Indigenous Nations (Unik
as Nagies Indigens) an onginiation that worked aginst
eat odds to guarates forthe fst ie in nal story the
Constitutional right to be smllaneosely indigenous and’ Bre-
allan.” Over & vatied profesional trajectory, Teena worked
‘in various capaies to chip sway at th colonialist roation
ship thatthe Bazan state initiated wit indigenous poples in
the postindependence period and fstitusonaed one centre
Inter throught indian Prtetion Service Alengse indigent
ROUSE RU Mok fe eg « A a a
GeWioocmeftaane)
Se ae
ital ret eens pg aon498 | Tuy Devine Garman
Intent art yt nea ge
ssesrace eso mean Maes
bby the dominant majority. esoteng =
SS «nga ey ne
ony enn rete ect
chiki en ey dnetare
genie nc yi a Ans
ai eK esata, nos Kae ene
{Rtn Home gar ad ea Syn SS
ieee Scene stain an! io a
Sole pearonmeceme ene
‘couster Foundational Histories rom Native Beal | 169
completo deny hisndasety or ever decade. To cremvent
{ho estos ofthe or indian Stat, whch ator ali
‘Rgshon peoples ae seley compte before the a, Be a
heen te misdntction s+ epanee” Tern).
Toren sexerene at omen extra and exceeding
Iycoumon. On the one and ene tee Native Brains
{Sta ton of sive power in he tates ngs bare
‘Gacy ort any eel of goverment. Oa the eter and son
eS wh th dey held onion tht ig indigenous is
tree wth profesional aisag wor ad thos uns
Hie te demands of clio” i ptomies the comin
‘einige in Berl at the ott tho now maileani
{hse hs eapercnce spe to tat of alone wordide who
Zils the preepton tt lndnanes" Is serehing one must
Shandon or overcome to dsr the al ight of atonal blo
igor fll uae olen oder ce
“Fhe spin of terete indigenons tznsh
tnd out Bands 1073 Indian Sata and sequent indies
[eek rail wat hooper Clog Agamben, aing on
eee of Crt Smt, toed ox he ste of pti the
Editon, marked by perp lees, hough whlch a0 “a
Site mun fh incled te state's ura order reels
{rough his permanent codon flxlston rom that der. Con
‘Wier ts ton in ight ofthe coe at and, we ght sy that
ite tndes non rl est an imaged” ation a
itgtpoltcal onder has vay bon contingent pete,
caer eta fered cophemistealy ia centu's worth
eEBtchodked indent doae wth cs Hie “neo-lien
Sage Seen Brinnon lsetsoled, anendigenoas
sehtinaton was weakened by the 1988 constitutions povso
thar Nae peoples would no lng ve to eas eg Tins
{hirer ls tobe Br nthe ee ote tte Bu the fora
[Stee of ectensly sre “proren™ poles has bal ne
‘ieapct cathe eens art and lence that til ane
‘7 Tatoo bend aqua th htm poplin
une scene pt ee
Freee OF Consist dl i dade deussud under th stat’ indigent practice inthe twenyfstcen-
‘The:988 Consttton, for instance called fo the demare-
tion of national indigenous tetris within ive years. Now me
than u quertercenary ater, the promise hat nat been met nad
scrocs the country Native peoples ike th Gasrant Kaw nd
themes nesses." Dts wie ated
scersin achieving economic growth atid poverty edcon du
Fooet years of Worker's Paty governs the clive stualos
findigeaos poopes resins dismal ord. The embrace of age,
brsines and the real of dicatorship-es development prj
resent major hres to indigenous lives and ivehoods Scone
they present, among other things, x major ttt indigenes
Jans ining ands tht are already suposed tbe protected =
“The hmedpis of Bra’ tweny-ist cent clon iy
the Belo Monte hydocectrc dtm, fet proposed fs construction
Sn the sate of Pak ring the so70 bythe alitary goverment
‘who called her project "Kartal ma name appropri mm tis
apap people who, with haunting cehoes of he Gursn-Rakw,
pledged ther Hves to stop Ie uri the deade that lowed
‘oassve outouringy of indigenous, tational, and international
‘protest freed the rpme to shelve fis plans to divert the flow af
‘he Xingu River and food Native and vesbed comsmuntio” ae=
tonsa rice ngued wos erp the ea fishing indy, de.
stroy rae plant and atl spetes, polite the enveonmeny ih
‘methine ga, and bring tthe reson thousnds of migrant ai
ested aio ems op Uae
ry emo de ool et
vo woul subsaety hav no place tlie wor Arguments
cand the new logy lee psd Bolo Monts no our
deur inthe worte~ mete sume objections and fvave, once
Zan, asa ofnigenou, toa aod international ora
‘oes contin elt by the ft atthe dan pret
‘olumge th brn cof milla catnip Bt the pt pe
‘of eat wax ani 2013 «popula aad nomial “progres
* Clearly such “peogress” benefits some at the expense of ath-
es Indgens atv began stenting th oposton
{o Bel nt rag the ao. enenry of aate-acked igen
isa acters tax not only prela tht comm
tim but noon ayo ofall ne wag ith atonal penis
yells, the development gas a Worker Party and the sats
Entre o ob capita insome otto etorng as.
Native att ist Kalngang hence reminds hat he plead
[tin Bra eben ~alongse the oie ight —arlentess
{cobs of Nate popes Wt Kindo progen dos this ys
{Tei triton want for x he sta "We Delve
{fs adlnsten, ny of pul the pope in pow and
tov they hve come out punt (Crgin)- Te rages on
thehortaon a however, ust ovt Belo Mone th hundreds
‘Holker moderation pete wore oon he bok. They
Sh tie tn eget pao ow to kep Nave way of lag
teow and enenbering alte ate ee of sate oponsre
deveopset agen tat ha bon ard in varous ema fr
ary bo centre and bas oly ela eet mrp nothe ccleratd Growth Program Programa de Aclerag do Ce
client, or PAC).
Taigenous pola leaders and acs who share with
Marcos Teena and Kv Kagang the dese er meaning op
Setenfation and particpation i stat polis dow fom wins
lube bina ning tht any tevetion thy mak tat spe
female agant great oe and st gat cot rete
tome degree the erasures excisions, an delmaation th
have characterized the Indlgenone state natin cnc x
setion" Tl efforts to partlpate in national germane ad
{nteroational pla bis dost these cumstances might be
famed a the least-worst option sale to india and com
‘munis whose maj of bein. knowing, and remembering aren
"sk of dlsapearing Or they might be the goundwor for en
Point alt. nine pal hn Dafoe
Feminds us that “the relationship beeen [dndignous ppl]
‘nd th. goverament i ‘plea, not maths he rane
phrases John Raw). “Tatives most se a fnegs language oer
lain the content of their its" he goes on, “hee tomy
Sout shaping its pilnopicl wert aod agape nites
‘hat enor the dcisons eeated by these disounc, Way? he
wynders and then nseris wn urea Loran Tes
arabe; Ral).
‘But wha does this survival man, wo must ask thinking
astclarly ofthe Guaran-Kaow~ for inowe implied dre
in such debates? What ithe desirable horn of tatesndgenss
‘sletons? What cn we conde efetingon x entuy of see
backed indigenism, aout the mlatonsip beiweca Indigent
representation, and belonging? Une any ef he eounerpess
‘Sewhre inthe Ames indnous cadens els ware
andar in Grrl contin to work for suvalin predominant
atonal tern reoesng te oportanis fr sa repreent
tion that are afore by thee double bn even a ne wor to
Joes themslies frm tA the sa time, ey paste a
intentving dialogue about indgenone iis ta extends beyond
national borders and tums the premise ofa trational indigent
cost Fonda ares fom Naive Bl | 365,
ols representation through sate tela, o a Agamben
mains enon i Te arate
sovereignty clan expected trough er neton of lil,
xing ong. ae ong, bog od ee
fevingdesibie Comune of dining state and
‘hroniing the pet and indeod ring ne meaning tthe concept
a brnatnes el
‘The Violent Brasures of Sovereignty
Sovereignty in the post Westphalian tain his complex
nd, of ore, tl folding history tha esi for ase purpses
‘ith the 2499 Inter eatera the papal bull signed by Alexander
Vito dim American ferrite forthe Spanish monary and
Jess into the welt century, with hosts af unsettled Ne
tive land claims from Maine to Oaxaca tothe Ptagonia, nd anal
ilo tothe pope by indigenous groupe worlwide o repudiate
the Chur’ comply intl historical subjugation. Where the
prevallligconeep of mson-tats rests on “Baropeen model po
Iitcal and socal ganization whose dominatt defining eharacte=
[sts ae exsushity oferta domain sind earch, cete
ned euthority” lege scolar James Any points out, “ndigenous
peoples. have organize primarily through Kinship tis and decen
{lied politcal ertures with shared or verlag spheres o
‘contol (1g). Domlaant (Westea) notions of sovereanty Us un
‘counter to the tradions, needs, nd interests of man sol doatiy
tng Native peoples and have been employed historically by state ae
tors to thelr detsiment ~most often through let meats and, as
‘we ae nove reminded constantly hy the Grei-Kaws with tal
‘consequences In Weber's classe frmlition, the sovereign sate
‘Sefend the we ofthe vslence deemed "neceary” forts preserva
tion, and that preservation in urn, undorgeds the state's ability
find right” to tse sch violence wl legitimacy, whether against
‘ther states raga sow subjects (8-81). The necessary vo
Tenee of dominant sovereignty hance reproduces the conditions of
fisown aces, and tows who flo reno the lesa of
‘ch vllenee, oto aacept the corllary clini that “it sno ee
that good ea fellow onl rom good, and ev only fom el!”
redoced, in Weber view to pola “nfaney” (29)‘vehicle forthe “capitalist axiomatic" and the inevitable homogeni-
‘Counter Foundations istrefi Nate Bra | 5
vied” ringos ofthe national community, ther tobe gnored.as
Srelvant or Seized nto seed "oserization”initives, Ne
te wage of eins knowing, and remembering could hod a placa
thecenter oe "ve social and pata reality” (Alfred 3). What
Ifodigenoas eprsertatns ofthe pat eld be, as aoe scholar
Linda Taha! Sth propose, means of “healing and transform
tion (46) fr Native peoples in he present raher tha fodder for
{hots continued fltoration, myaeabon, end erasure vis-a-vis
{he domipant majority aad ite prevailing hstoical nacatives?
Native Critiques of Sovereignty
‘ative itll Bra (and elsewhere) have proposed
numero pllesnphil and politcal altemalives to the lent
tromkings of the sovereignty that ress atthe heart of dominant
pots Wile these proposals ore specific to particular times and
ces, common ground continveso expand thorough indigenous
onindigenoas Tegal and pols! collaboration at national and
Jnernational levels. Although the 2007 United Nations Deda
tion on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples makes no statement with
egatd to soverelgnty other than to rat that of the signatory
Rule nine of the Delaratlonsforg-ak artes (8, 10, 25-30,
‘31 upld Native rights with referenoe to Uaditona lads, tr
‘ites and esourees”poatng to te centrality of land rights to
Indigenous politcal inaties werldvide
alike dominant rendering of sovereignty, which are de
rived from a eoonlls imple, grounded in stores of vclence,
{nd sustained hy the avert or ipl threat of ational viclence,
lntemporay indigenous notions of sovereigaty stem from a asie
‘unspleof mutual respect toa-enerve forms of authority, and
{he comvition that human socety end he ntarl word et co
{rissa partecship where value expressed in tormsoffongevity
End equiftovinm rather than extraction, surplus or prt. As Mo
fw tears Tine Aled pts it Uo "pray goal ofa (adSioa indigenous economy are the sais ofthe crt nd
the heath and wellbeing of ha people” 46). One aleatine to
Soverloy a neces “lent prodticn™" a socal co
Stroction representing the rnevtable rump of some ens oes
others eal, a“nonnts”ine ope at
bas famevorks of soxsene by acknowllsig te cot
ond antnamy oe constivent Gemets ofthe radon
Give 46, my empl). These penile sonst wt Ee
expreied by Notve atts and schon ral who ae ao
‘tuned ina two red steal forte demarcation indigenous
{errand egal epresenttion vedo the tte.
“That th Todam problem” isa problem telnet
Cares fardtegal wot famous ini Sate ensayo (928) la he
ery twentieth century, Inde sl he eas though not only
forthe esoos be inagiad when contenplting the argency of
gare sl pit refers a he Andes, Yetconenporsy ia
‘uous hort rl abate vith he father of Pen cis
Satiqueteaptali modes of produstion land ile, au ate
labor As Mate ognize ptt ane sng Usa pers
af FUNAL lander and nator indo ply, te Tala
tan, and rom it cannot be separ (AIR, “Quem Somes") The
ihren nth nero fl: On th re ay
{ul valate the dangerous common perception ha sn ad
Stee “postraditoal” Native peoples to somehow ls nie
uous has hr ountesparts vein ae, more cane
areas" Oa theiher os sper Nasve eae
the intrest and sabeoming ts aes intrss nt com
Deting dsenurses of xvronmentl proton end developmen
thas longheen the cs, of cour tat or any nuns f|
reasons, some poole choos to dcasoitethemscve om
Aigenons wns of ie sad ie thelr communis indent. But
those who do selanify with inigncy inp termo,
tars hrs and how theyre and wor, do tend topos
theland and it protection some in eas ote saexe omen
terms of the enronments some who argc both poston and see
them at nde rc this esoiaton poses ay ages
{orving iter-Anercan and global indigenous movements and
Serves ts one comion grou forthe indgenus/ otic
allanecs that wil continue to be neessry if those movement re
to poet inigeieyito te ture asa orm of sential,
2 plies, rane of whi non-Natves might also pata,
Tn an efoe to offre manned peroetans of his om
many and attoduce non Native adinom to base tenets of Ter-
hu pital, relgogrseholrUlo Palva Flores underscores
the alversty among the indigenous peoples Uving inside Bratian
borders and emphases the varying degrees to whic they have
braced dominant eights frts and partly, Chisaniy)
‘bd melded them ith Native lcs and practices. Te emphasis
{he importance of woekiag toward a harmonious relationship with,
the natural exvironment and observes that, "his pace isi
‘eosingly lecovered andi by. [non Naive] peoples” (Fores
‘5: 2009) Crain, one doesnot have to Ive in oF near Amazonia
oer to espeat the ent, but it in the forests, in vers, ad
Slongsie the animals Flores suggest, tht indigent peoples
Teplenish thei drenins and constr thelr tops fo bring about
‘memony between lumans and nature so tht they ean develop
‘no one sole lng” (256). Sah harmony nis wew, regres
‘and produces ocal sustainability and ula:
Compl ode snot ies (etl mlb I soe, 1 sf
thal pune of compamentac, elle] osdentl poe
ln, whch eels) agai nt comet te
(har smeone ha fo win From ht kd of dan] ak
Inger te chen of satan hat abn ro isnot
‘Govgit Woot the average betwee besten ad
Ilo thee osu? and som wha Go)
Flores eso to explain othe alae at workin the mat-
tural word la exit eal, nthe bisa ori,Uhsansform
lng human quale ad experiences nto an undiided continu
father tha a sti of opporing fore and interest hat can ony
Ibefoldad nt eae a er-sum game and eaaed atone another's
expense:
"The eens fr the eof god ea aman endensy
The nt comes twit rei Te dea pst
rts on th bounds whee one ade ad he ter begs
‘geno hug il fect cade wiboa t woul
tutored oben inthe other eto on tel cass
there wold fe no such sae "Blne" wold tot be essecam everything molded Be on jst the ae,
Wii easter 40)
te ocher Indigenous atts and intllectuls fn Bra,
then, Foes suggests tet the nevis connectedness of ua
experience makes social enmity nonsense, for to harm thesis
‘harm anes Resoel consider, on the other hand, sa
‘soca cultural, and pote duty without whieh community sa
abstract conenpt g meannglss, abd eommaity axa Hived prose
‘wllavaj be destined to fale As Aled wes: “ingemous co
‘pions and the poles that flo from thera alta na tangible
‘vay the dstintion betwen various pltcal cammunites and eon
{alnan imperative of expect ht rectus he need for bomogen-
sation" 4B). Without the assimilate impale” of Wester savers
‘lgnty, oexstance canbe abieted without volenoe andthe
‘ole host of politely socal and cata structures throug
‘which olenceis eter realizado held in abeyance sa hegemonic
Impulse toward compulsory coesion. Fores proposal reoaates
witha belie broadly hold and areulstd strategy by Native
Bras that sf and Other are inextricably bound, ad that
adr to rethink dominant sovereignty to achieve peace among
‘nan commis, end between mankind and the matte we,
indigenous kncledge must be acknowledged as much more han
“altura artifact” (fed 40).
A Political Aesthetics of Memory
eter and utvst ae Potiguar, who found the Gri-
po de Malheres Incigena in 3979 ant patpated fn the des
Sons tat culminated inthe UN, Declaration on the Rights fle
AigenousPeopic, has been atthe forefront of thie native, Het
‘flrs exemplly how creative cllural prodetion has become
‘ital mechani through which Native Brains are working to
Feshape meinsream pital debates, think the pas, nd emake
the national imaginary oa more democrat er Isl ive het
th last word.
Inher 2005 book, Meta cara, metade miscare,Potiguara
Snterperses historical narrative, pital commentary, and paley
stagestions with shor stores and pty. Amthieal Native couple,
‘Cimhata{ and Jurupiranga, appeals at sveral junctures in the text
ous oanatin ise om athe Bre | 60
sarod athe roxas fines ses in atin om
‘ep and wedetng ofthe pst. the penlimate caper,
Frovsga cylin sent fi rter whoa bee eve
tier eb fom ey long se:
Recs era nour vall ad sande fp
Se acne lage Seed es
ise sapanis wg forthe Jess Mates in
an aoa cars He et
Sei eee eles oe len de oy
Zaventem cane wow an tex
a at yan i othe apo the arm
Sins Enh Dey Penh, rn, ote ene Be
See mel troup preps ie He
th he went dene eda: ae,
sa ees emacs etre
rane wih ise, ait enemies He bad
reise, et nis oman onreba alta
sceond line 70)
rea prot ise at eam
sera oc
ct eS
sey chine wee ees ne Cision at
Soe teen nas guises am
‘And so in Jarupiranga's dear —and for now only here
Potiguats can reslze the alleratve sovereignty claims throughhich tris Nave peoples are empowered vies the domi
Zant ect inthe reins of elton ate, loopy ole
Caton aw cd polls by a-engthenng a en af Wigs
through whic pst and tury tavon and moray pea
‘ny elf and Other cess fr the meng of nds a
‘onindigenous peoples lke
Future's policed asthe of memory may om
serativein ight ofthe challenge ced ody hy Neti role
Bra Buter dev to cone the vale induces oo
ceo reframe and confor thse ehllenges nt ae
‘elton. The lsh she pues before tna o eet
prophesy in pol a ithee were some single erent
Eetren te hat ea the pol and unis
the pasha shape om prspehes tht ae here
tnd see aha ints hpennic sane tere
Rotgur' work resonates wih at Nate communes ey
{he American who pel ws to understand tats as Tuer ps
nlm eof deranged rear hs
sul ofall people (27) And departing oats pretcg ve
‘ght wl appreciate Kenealon i aos
{idea or ane mht wa arte
especially on the darkest of days, to think that we all are, indecd,
‘Guarani-Kaiows, " =
iiography
Acsnpananto Reluciso Inditna (AN), “Quem somos
Web, chin sameeren Sages
poteam>. ae
Aanben, Gogo. Homo Sacer
re 998
~ Se of Bein, Chg: Unive of hin Pes, 00
Alo, Tasik. "Sovereign"
ret.” Saereigty Mater. i oune
Borer: Lino aie of Nera as ai
tort Ox Unery Pre 2004, tel Ha
Anal, Goris. Borderlandy/La Frontera al Sab Francis
co: Aunt Lit, 2007
Stanford: Stanford Univerty
count Fondo Historie om Native Bro | 37
Arguesas, Jot Mara °No saan sculturad." Lina, October 968
‘Bl zonro de aorba'y ol oro de bajo. Lia: Horio
088.194
= Los os profes. Mads Citar, 1995
=: ELrorro de arriba el zorr de abajo. Lima: Horizonte, 988,
Barnhart Rand A, O.Kawagly. “Indigenous Knowledge Systems
fu Alas Native Ways of Knowing” Anthropology ad
‘Baton Quarterly 362 (2005) 823
‘Cenqeira,Ceytenne “A Ina fo contra Belo Monte" Con=
Selo Tndigesea Mssondro, 10 August 2010. Web. Ni
“hy: cmongbe tee
Ctra, Leda Rita ed. Esertos inden: wna antolgia Sto Pa
n altoraCamiahos, 2013,
Davis Shelton H. Viens ofthe Miracle, Cambridge: Cambs
‘Univer Pres [1977] 2009.
Delia, Vine, Jr Pilosophy snd the Toba oops" American
‘indir Thought. Bl Anne Waters. New York: Blachvel
2005 34
Deleae, Gilles and Félix Guatiae. A Thousand Pateaus: Copia:
“am and Schizophrenia, Trans. Brian Mass Minntapo
Tis: University of Minot Poss, 1987.
Devine Guemin, Tac. Native an National: Indigent After In-
dependence Capel Hil: UNC Press, 2033
‘Weking ndigenows Activia in Bri.” A Contracoriente 10.3
(2012): 280-309.
-Rimanakay °86 and other Mellons of National Dialogue in
ers” Latin Americana §. (2009): 75-97.
‘Gomes, Mérco, The din and Bra. Trans. J.W. Moon. Gaines
Vil, FL: University Pres of Florida, 2000.
—0 indo na istria, Petrol: Vous, 2002.
lore, Lio Paiva, doradores do so: Petropolis Vous, 2003,
"Cultura ea ex-eultur.”Sol do pensamento. Ed Hane Potigut~
a: Tubrapi / Gri, 2005, 30°32
So
Carfld, Seth, Indigenous Srugle at the Heart of Braz, Dus
Tams Duke University Press, 200%Guin, rau “Utertura nga no Dsl cotemporine tox
‘nus question em nbena” Bdcagao «ngage 1
nse 0 Tinga 5 (8)
earn, Kly. “The Bags Movement.” The Nation, 19 Jy 20
‘Web. Nid. . "
Menming, Job. Dif You Must: Brat nonin he Toei
th Centr London: acrlan 009
{BE “2010 Census” Web, Na hp/sadcinprens bye
-br/en/noticias?view=noticiadid=1&idnoticia~2i94>. 7
~: Conso demoarifin sro. Web, Na, , ue =
0s indies 20 Cens0Derogrico 2010, pret onside
agi Web. Na hip feng or ngna i
‘digena_censo2o.0.pdf>. 7
Inaindo Sucioanbientl Web. NA