UNIVERSIDAD CATOLICA DE LA SANTISIMA CONCEPCION FACULTAD DE EDUCAGION DEPARTAMENTO DE LENGUAS TEACHING PRACTICE Mo lo [STUDENT-TEACHER'S NAME :_) (YO Venclscy EVALUATOR'S NAME \shil Gusey & upled tip Hy Ques pre 4 a lel cil es PPP Assessment ; ‘CRITERIA | Improvement +d % rie . Rape NAO AS ae a) Is the aim of the lesson clearly communicated | 5 2 | Sans. to the students? _ - | | { \po( ws 5 b) Does the student-teacher start the cla s | 4 | 2 1 4 \y ” doing a meaningful in activity? | 1, e doing a meaningl ] | ti 6) Is the new language clearly presented in the 5 4 ea 1 Presentation Stage? =” | a | | ) Does the student-teacher try any drilling 5 4 3 ase : exercise other than the “repeat-after-me”?__| Ae | | = | ' €) Does the student-teacher start the Practice 5 4 3 2 ie) | Stage with a suitable controlled activity? |“ \ | £) Does the student-teacher work with & ie <4 eae jo at ‘Less-controlled activity ? mae” | 5 aie | ies in the Production Stage (3 4 3 2 1 | eted with the aim of the lesson? : | bt hehe ‘well-chosen & well-prepared? (3) 4 3 2 1 ie Ee wunufer Mee ts ia): |: |b” UdKeR, ; uk yor used by the student-teacher © ge 2 1 | overcdhae of grammar and ey coe Wontter & odie Way re ere, Erect V cywod yusete & MKS.