Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mole% Methyl-: Calculation of Multicomponent Distillation Accompanied by A Chemical Reaction'
Mole% Methyl-: Calculation of Multicomponent Distillation Accompanied by A Chemical Reaction'
distillation
with
bromide
RunNo.
FeedcomSaltcon-
position
zinc
position of
C [wt%]
Nomenclature
bottom product,
mole%
methylene chloride
0
4.65
4.65
4.65
4.65
3.20
3.20
3.20
3.20
1
2
6
12.00
5.35
containing
Vaporcom-
centration
mole%
methylene
chloride
10
reflux
abo ut 10
abo ut 30
abo ut 50
0
abo ut 10
abo ut 30
abo ut 50
6.50
4.55
4.50
1.75
0.72
0.41
2.75
0.31
0.ll
0.09
(salt-free
Literature
cited
ton (1959)
Hashitani,
Kogaku, 32,
182
M., M. Hirata
(1968)
and
Y. Hirose:
Kagaku
Conclusions
Vapor-liquid
equilibrium
data
pressure of the system: methylene
with zinc bromide,
zinc chloride
basis)
at atmospheric
chloride-acetone
and potassium
Chem. Rev.,
6) 44,Meranda,
D. and W. F. Further:
298 (1966)
7) 9, Ramalho,
R. S. and N. S. Edgett:
324 (1964)
(1952)
8) Smith,
2867 (1949)
9)
Timmermans,
J.:
"The
51, 119
Physico-Chemical
Constants
of Pure Organic Compounds," Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc., New York (1950)
YAGI,
HIROMASA
KOMATSU
AND
The distillation
continubasis for
Othmer
as there
are considerable
difficulties in solving a exact design
problem, they used manual plate-to-plate
calculations with very rough approximations
in vaporliquid equilibrium and reaction rate relations.
In the previous paper6), we described experimental
in a distillation
column reactor with sieve tray, and
successive
plate-to-plate
design
calculations
with
graphical
techniques
and empirical
correlations.
Furthermore, numerical correlations
and a method
of prediction
for the vapor-liquid
equilibrium
accompanied by esterification
have been also reported^).
the
basic
relations
is included.
This
method
developed
by Amundson et al. for the solution
of
linearized
material
equations,
and uses modified
Muller's
method for convergence of the column
temperature
profile.
For agreement between the
assumed and the calculated
conversion of reaction,
no method obtains more stable and rapid convergence than does the iterative
method.
To be specific,
rectification
accompanied
with
continuous production
of ethyl acetate with equilib-
It is specified
that the number of stages, feed plate
location, condition of feed, reflux rate and overhead
vapor drawoff were fixed in advance so that the
composition profile through the column and conversion of reaction might be computed.
1.
Method
Fig.
of Computation
A model
for
the
distillation
column
reactor
For
the convenience
of derivingsystem
the general
working equations,
a hypothetical
as shown in
Fig.1
is
considered
as
model
column.
This
as the n-th
stage.
It is assumed
that
one
feed stream Fj, one vapor side stream Gj, one liquid
side stream Uj and one intercooler or interheater
Fig.
leaving the same stage and the reaction rate is constant because of the steady state.
Fig. 2 shows such
an ideal equilibrium
stage.
There are generally
four sets of equations
which
must be satisfied
in a calculation
for the rigorous
equilibrium
stage accompanied by a chemical reaction.
They are the material
balance equation, the
vapor-liquid
relation,
the rate equation of reaction
and the heat balance equation.
For the case of a
4
NO.
197I
An ideal
equilibrium
stage
VOL.
to Figs,
1 and
2, the
equations
for
the
27
Aj=Lj^=Vj+
Lj^xtj^
- (Vj + Gj)yij
- (Lj + Uj)xtJ+Vj+1yiJ+1
+i^+ ARj - 0
2^j^n-l
3
2(Fk-Ck-Uk)
(1)
B}= -Wi+GJKt,+F,+1+
ratio K^ depends
and composition.
-D+Uj]
Cj=Vj+1Kij+1
Dj= -FjZijARj
yiS -KijXtj
= 0
Summations of vapor and liquid
on each stage
on
(2)
mole fractions
Sva-1.o=o
k-2
2<j<n-1
2^j^n-l
2^j^n
(9)
An=Vn+Gn+W-Fn
Bn = -(Vn + Gn)Kin-W
Dn = -FnZin ARn
(3a)
i-1
(10)
Thisfollowing
set of equations
may be formally written as
matrix equation.
the
or
2xtJ-1.o=o
The overall
reaction
rate
AX=D
(3b)
1=1
to be calculated
which
is calculated
equilibrium
Heat
balance
equation
at constant
each
composition,
molal
(4)
When the
106
stant,
is reduced
C2
A,
Bj
A.n-i
B2
Cj
>n-l
An
Dj
(~"n-l
Bn
ftin-1
A.-.
ftin
A.
where=-VxKn-U-U,
= VoKi2
the
equilibrium
ratios
KiS can
l<j<n-l
(14)
2<j<n-1
-AjVj-i)
2^j^n-l
from the above algorithm
(7)
1<i<m
C,
that
ft%\
A2
provided
xij=
Qj-Pj%ij+i
Vi=CJB,
qi = DJB,
Vj - CjKBj-AjVj-x)
qj = (Dj-Ajqj-JKBj
When the xti obtained
(6)
equation
rates
Gauss elimination
method.
Using this algorithm,
values of x.Lj are calculated
by first evaluating
xin
and receding
backward
with j decreasing
until
xn
is reached.
These equations
are shown as follows;
D=V1+U1
flow
(Vj + GJ-ihj-hj-JLj-!
= 0
l<j<n
(13)
and compositions
of feed
Considering
that the esterification
is an equimolal
reaction,
Eqs. (1) and (2) are combined and the
liquid rate is expressed as functions of the vapor rate
by an overall material balance.
where
- (Hj - hj)
+JRjHrj
(5)
2(Fk-Gk-Uk)-D
(12)
2 Pij%i
L,=VJ+l+
l^j^n
volume and
X\j
of
(Hj+i ~ hj)Vj+1
+Fj(HFj-hj)-Qj
manipulation
i=l
stage
Lj^hj^
- (Vj + Gj)Hj - (Lj + Uj)hj
+ Vj+1Hj+1
+F,/^,
- i + JRjHrj
= 0
and further
m
2#*i&<j-1.0=0
(3c)
around
equations
by
2JRj-AR=0
(ll)
by over-
(8)
can provide
X]V*-Gk-Uk)-D
28'
the desired
solution
at the stable
state.
OF JAPAN
Fig.
Block
diagram
of the
Muller's
method
Fig.
3.
ARj is calculated
from the reaction rate
and Tj is obtained
from the summation
Procedure
Computational
follows ;
procedure
may be
written
as
perature
Calculate
the
4
5
2AT)
ele-
NO.
1971
(15)
VOL.
(T,),-i)2^0.Oln
= 2((Tj)t-
were;
Step
Examples
360
digital computer,
and The
manyconvergence
test problemscriteria
have
been successfully
solved.
Numerical
As illustrative
be calculated
directly
from the heat balance equation if enthalpies
of feed streams and heat duties of
the intercoolers
or interheaters
are given.
Computational
diagram
2.
Block
procedure of Muller's
equation,
equation
rou'29'
29
The enthalpies
logfc=
equilibrium
and
equilibrium
x 10~2/-
LogK2=
LogK3=
LogKt=
-2.3
-2.3
-2.3
enthalpy
ratio;
1.666
data
Ki
2421.29
+ 2.0142T
+ 2.80325
X 10-2T2-0.11363
x 10-4T3
-f 0.002005
x 10~6T4
H2 = - 3003.24+
4.750T
+ 2.503
x 10"2T2
-0.8263
x 10~5r3+
1.1975
x 10~3T4
H3 = 40.83193(T/100)
+ 0.36710(T2/100)
+ 0.0616
x 10-4T3
+ 34.42355(100/T)
Hs; Btu/lb,
10.31T
T;+ 30.495
R
given
x 10"3T2
can be calculated
from the
0.00000
0.00000
0.00001
0.00083
0.02524
0. 18996
0. 18908
0. 18850
0. 18849
0. 19056
0.20341
0.26740
0.47028
30
mole of reaction
1
1
0.01282
0.01820
0.02452
0.03
180
0.03920
0.04029
0.04944
0.06213
0.07999
0. 10509
0.13860
0. 17254
0.17014
Composition profile
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00027
0.00027
0.00027
0.00028
0.00029
0.00036
0.00073
0.01014
Total
0.62822
0.7007
0.7552
0.79283
0.79752
0.67402
0.66120
0.64632
0.62735
0.60082
0.55776
0.47083
0.30064
0.54656
0.62322
0.69404
0.74342
0.77743
0.78162
0.76584
0.74913
0.72959
0.70441
0.66875
0.61013
0.49150
0.00876
0.01282
0.01770
0.02343
0.03003
0.03671
0.04499
0.05658
0.07309
0.09680
0.13057
0.17568
= 0.01261
Conversion
= 0.24371
30)
0.34498
0.27037
0.21196
0. 16809
0.13309
0.09270
0.09766
0.10106
0.10288
0.10287
0.09984
0.08913
0.06216
Vi ,"
0.21855
0.20800
0.20532
0.20325
0.20149
0.20048
0.30578
0.30581
0.30572
0.30552
0.30526
0.30571
0.31145
0.08680
0.0
0.22880
0.22612
0.22405
0.22229
0.22128
0.21898
0.21901
0.2 1892
0.21872
0.212846
0.21891
0.22465
Reac.mol
example
-0.048
-0.044
-0.040
-0.042
-0.045
0.016
-0.002
-0.023
-0.042
-0.058
-0.078
-0.136
-0.198
first
72.781
73.461
74.023
74.482
75.370
79.399
79.371
79.387
79.466
79.656
80.184
82.025
87.647
of the
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
Delta
results
0.98601
0.98928
0.99170
0.99355
0.99506
0.99696
0.99739
0.99801
0.99870
0.99933
0.99962
0.99990
number 7
Temp.
Final
5.
Iteration
Fig.
activity coefficient,
the same problem is considered.
In this case, the values of %,Lj require to calculate the
activity
coefficient. Then, the procedure is made
to switch after five iterations
by the vapor liquid
in
It
only
and
are
x 10~6T3
enthalpies
example.
Liquid
of this
4981.59+
- 5.390
results
is observed
that Tj9 Vj, Lj, xi3- and JRj change
slightly
after
second iteration.
Temperature
reaction rate used in the successive
iterations
Liquid
No.
as
x \03/T+6.58825
x 103/T+6.48351
x 103/T+6.74151
Hx = -
is taken
1.0 (/) at the bottom and 0.3 (/) at each stage except
Enthalpy
Vapor
H4=
The holdup
2. Activity coefficient
Activity coefficients for this system are reported
in the previous paper.10)
3.
of temperature.
+3.70
Table
1. Vapor-liquid
Kx=2.25
_A^xi01
1.00322
Sum :
0.98248
0.98601
0.98898
0.99117
0.99285
0.9942
1
0.99448
0.99507
0.99594
0.99691
0.99779
0.99819
0.99862
OF JAPAN
equilibrium
in temperature.
A converged solution
was obtained in eight iterations
after the switching.
4.
and reaction
rate
profiles
Table
Fig. 6 Composition
second example
for the
Final
of Method
Fig. 5 Temperature
first example
Evaluation
results
of the
second
and temperature
72.769
0.010
2
72.932
3
73.156
4
73547
5
74.698
6
80.103
7
80.337
8 80.609
9
80.923
10
81.335
l
82196
12
84.962
13
92.139
0.011
0.011
0.006
-0.014
-0.007
-0.026
-0.024
-0.041
-0.042
-0.042
-0.056
-0.058
O0
0.22880
0.22736
0.22536
0.22262
0.21948
0.21695
0.21618
0.21534
0.21446
0.21366
0.21379
0.21971
j Reac. mol
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0.00030
9
0.00032
10
0.00035
l
000045
12
0.00094
13
0.01166
Totalmol.
VOL.4
0.00000
0.45017
0.05735
0.48928
0.20656
0.20456
0.20182
0.19868
0.30375
0.30298
0.30214
0.30126
0.30045
0.30059
0.30651
0.08680
0.00000
0.00006
0.00144
0.02749
0.19287
0.19266
0.19259
0.19297
0.19568
0.21062
0.27586
0.44682
0.49419
0.54799
0.61101
0.66266
0.59829
0.59742
0.59480
0.58870
0.57551
0.54484
0.46810
0.31985
0.05412
0.05522
0.06074
0.06846
0.06321
0.07616
0.09181
0.11107
0.13522
0.16459
0.18999
0-18293
0.44900
0.39478
0.32565
0.24087
0.14565
0.13404
0.12117
0.10758
0.09373
0.07984
0.06587
0.05103
Composition profile
NO.
0.02563
of reaction
1
1971
AcOEt
0.20800
o00000
0.00000
0.00000
000000
000000
0.00027
0.00029
= 0.01460
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00005
0.00131
0.02491
0.02521
0.41687
0.45017
0.49016
0.53896
0.59598
0.64254
0.64363
0.64389
0.02627
0.02761
0.03246
0.05571
0.15521
0.64179
0.63490
0.61818
0.57718
0.47356
Conversion
(31)
for
the
example
Iteration number13
No.j Temp.
Delta
Composition
profileWater %y
Tj
Tj
Vj
Lj
AcOH
EtOH
~1
profiles
be solved
very stable
algorithm.
6 method,
yij
0.99680
0.99732
0.99806
0.99885
0.99948
1.00002
1.00027
1.00037
1.00031
1.00012
0.99989
0.99982
1.00063
kk
F~~
4
5
3
1
1
3
4
4
4
1
1
1
Sum yi
0.06434
0.05735
0.05442
0.05542
0.06043
0.06739
0.08137
0.51520
0.48928
0.45268
0.40351
0.34094
0.26440
0.24957
0.99641
0.99680
0.99727
0.99794
0.99866
0.99923
0.99977
0.11892
0.14460
0.17702
0.21616
0.24589
0.23234
0.21328
0.19307
0.17226
0.15054
0.12484
1.00012
1.00026
1.00018
0.99992
0.99959
0.99950
0.09826
= 0.28215
Sum %i
SumDelta
T5 = 0.01363
___
31
No.
Temp.
Iteration
Delta
Lj
AcOH
example
EtOH
Xi j
AcOEt
Water
Sumxt
Reac.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
mol
0.31310
0.33352
0.35589
0.38079
0.40048
0.35337
0.39576
0.43963
0.47901
0.50983
0.53008
0.53433
0.37299
Composition profile
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00001
0.00035
0.00040
0100047
0.00055
0.00062
0.00071
0.00089
0.01099
= 0.01498
Conversion
0.00000
0.00000
0.00000
0.00006
0.00162
0.03365
0.03465
0.03670
0.03957
0.04281
0.04703
0.05640
0.15633
= 0.27837
0.29571
0.31310
0.33166
0.35200
0.37461
0.39246
0.43666
0.48816
0.54185
0.59073
0.62992
0.65692
0.54817
Sum Delta
0.16708
0.14851
0.13248
0.11996
0.11138
0.10725
0.11821
0.13185
0. 14668
0.15968
0.16772
0.16824
0.19134
3
3
1
1
1
0.53551
0.53243
0.52355
0.50603
0.45512
0.30991
0.25186
0.19215
0.13914
0.09843
0.07044
0.05216
0.04346
0.14851
0.13088
0.11710
0.10766
0.10310
0.09223
0.10540
0.11986
0.13307
0.14237
0.14560
0.13993
0.13620
0.00000
0.00000
0.00007
0.00178
0.03704
0.23940
0.24165
0.2443
0.24665
0.24900
0.25474
0.24777
0.44803
0.0
0.20800
0.22880
0.20810
0.22890
0.20791
0.22871
0.20713
0.22793
0.20528
0.22608
0.25545
0.22245
0.25294
0.2 1994
0.25048
0.2 1 748
0.24842
0.2 1542
0.24700
0.2 1400
0.24642
0.21342
0.30635
0.2 1955
0.08680
-0.005
0.001
-0.001
-0.002
0.019
0.062
0.141
0.183
0.179
0.138
0.091
0.067
0.058
1
72.002
2
72.071
3
72.155
4
72.286
5
73.154
6 79.408
7 80.069
8 80.983
9
82.013
10
82.974
1 1
83.854
12
85.032
13
92.014
Vj
y-i j
0.53443
0.53551
0.53271
0.52464
0.50872
0.46249
0.40437
0.33688
0.26696
0.20405
0.15463
0.11917
Sum ;
0.99723
0.99712
0.99686
0.99665
0.99633
0.99586
0.99388
0.99360
0.99506
0.99727
0.99931
1.00072
1.00138
0.10554
Tj = 0.12477
Nomenclature
overhead distillate
product
feed rate at the feed plate
HF
Ti=
verged solution.
Conclusions
5.
m
n
balance
Qd
Muller's
method
for
piQb
and
component number
stage number
rate constant
at stage j
[//mole-min]
has
been derived
and demonstrated ofby means
of the
tridiagonal
method for solution
the material
equation
[mole/min]
[mole/min]
[mole/min]
[mole/min]
[cal/mole]
[cal/mole]
[cal/mole]
[-]
[-]
[-]
reaction
A detailed
and completely
automatic
method
of determining
the multicomponent
separation
accompanied by a chemical reaction achieved
by a
fractionating
column reactor with fixed conditions
rate
con-
stream
flowing
(.7 + 1)
[mole/min]
total number of components of mixture
[-]
total numberof stages in the complex column[-]
[mmHg]
vapor pressure of component i
[cal/min]
heat duty of the reboiler
[cal/min]
heat duty of the condenser
[mole/min]
reaction rate at stage j
[C]
temperature at stage j
[mole/min]
liquid side stream from stage j
vapor stream leaving stage j to stage (j -\- 1)
Us
V,-
Acknowledgement
to the
Chiyoda
[mole/min]
W= bottom product
[mole/min]
Xij = composition of the liquid stream leaving stage j
[mole fr.]
[mole fr.]
Zij = composition of the feed stream entering stage j
[mole fr.]
pij = molar volumeof component/ at stage j
Chem. Eng.
for this
study.
[m//mole]
32'
OF JAPAN
Literature
cited
1) Petroleum
"Technical Institute
Data Book-Petroleum
Refining", American
(1966)
2)
Belck,
L.H.:
A.LCh.E.
4)
Eng. Chem.,
"International
(1926-1939)
40(ll),
Journal,
1,
467
(1955)
2139 (1948)
Critical
Tables",
10)Japan,
Suzuki,3(2), I.,
McGraw-Hill,
152
H. (1970)
Komatsu and M. Hirata:J.
Chem. Eng.
5) (1968)
"Kagaku Kogaku Binran" revised 3rd ed.5 Maruzen
and ordinary
The difficulty of
comesuccessfully
ing ethylbromide
distillation
was
* Received
* * Chemical
such
onJuly
as absorption,
25, 1970
Engineering
Laboratory,
alone.
Oil
NO.
1971
requires
adsorption
Toa
dehydration,
however, was overby azeotropic
distillation
employas separating
agent, after ordinary
found unsatisfactory.
Evaluation
Co.,
Kawasaki, Japan
VOL.
Introduction
Various
distillation
33)
33