Professional Documents
Culture Documents
اثر النظم الخبيرة
اثر النظم الخبيرة
) 15( ) 11(
.
) (75 ) (100
:
.
: ) ( .
dr_sulieman@yahoo.com
2 - -
malbugami@ut.edu.sa
2014/6/17 .2014/9/18
-117-
.
Executive
Information
Systems
2015 / . .
...
:
.
:
.1
.2
.3
) (
:
)
(
(2007
)(Atymtayeva.2012
.
)Kozhakhmet& Bortsova& Atymtayeva, 2012
).(Soufi, etal, 2013
( Devale & Kulkarni, V.2012).
) Kozhakhmet & Bortsova & Atymtayeva,
(2012
).
(2004
:
-118-
11 2015 1
.
:
.
:
) (.
:
) 11()
(www.fxnewstoday.ae
)15()
( www.ase.com.jo) 2014
)4
( ) 3 (
) (100 ) (75 -
-
) (83
) (70
) (79 ) (67
.)(1
:
.
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
:
:
.
:
:
-119-
...
)(1
+
1
+
2
+
3
+
4
+
5
+
6
+
7
+
8
+
9
+
10
+
11
1
2
)(
3
4
5
+
6
7
8
9
10
11
-
12
13
14
15
) (1:
-120-
11 2015 1
-
"
.
.3 )( Hazar& Mohamed , 2013
:
"
.1)(Yohann,2014
Continuous Auditing: Technology
" Involved
:
Razaee et al., 2002 :
Onions, 2003
Woodroof & Searcy, 2001
.
.2 ) (2013 "
-121-
...
) (
.
.
.5 ) (2012"
"
.
.6 ) (2012"
Accounting Information
"
Systems in an ERP Environment
" and Tunisian Firm Performance
) (AIS
.
AIS
.
The
.4) (Omoteso,2012 "
application of artificial intelligence in
"auditing: Looking back to the future
-122-
11 2015 1
.
.8) (Devale & Kulkarni,2012"
A Review of Expert System in
" Information System Audit
.
.9 ) (2011"
"
"
.
.7 ) &Kozhakhmet& Bortsova
(Atymtayeva,2012 " Some
Issues of Development of Intelligent
System for Information Security
"Auditing
.
.
-123-
...
.
.11 ) (2010
"
"
..
.
.12 )( Dowling & Leech,2007
" Audit support systems and
decision aids: Current practice and
" opportunities for future research
.
.10 ) (2011"
"
-124-
11 2015 1
.
)(1
.
.
:
Artificial
) Intelligence (AI
Expert Systems
.
(Metaxiotis and Samouilidis,2000).
) (http://www-formal.stanford.edu ) Soufi ,
(etal.2013
:
.
.
"" "" .
.
:
.
-125-
...
) .2009 (27
.
) : (2009 )
(2011 )
.(2011
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
.7
.
) . 2004
(18)(Negnevitsky,2005,pp:30-31,48
.
)(Wan Hussain Wan Ishak et.al,2010
.
(
) (
). 2004 (2
)(Turban et., 2002, p: 22
:
.
) (Huang,2006
... ) . 2000 (495
) (2012
-126-
11 2015 1
:
:
Soufi , etal.2013,pp:480-.
) (481 ) 2010 (9 ) (Omoteso,
2012,p:8492
:
) (Grippo & Siegel, .
) ) (2001 .(2001
.
.
) (AICPA
)
(AICPA, 2001).
2007 .(161-158 :
) .
2004 (303
). 2009(345 :
) (2004
:
2004 2001 1987 2008
1001 1002
1003 2001
.
315 2008
401
). 2009 (15: )
2008 (16 :
-127-
...
) (Going Concern- ex
) (AUDITOR )(AREX
) ).(AUDPORT (2012
:
) (Bonnet &Haton& Truong, 1986
) ( Lallem,2002 )( Moteur, 1987
ISIS) International Species
.1
: (Information System
.
.2 ) (I. Survey ) :(TRACOR
.
.3 ) : ( Finexpro
.
.4 ) : (Crdit Manager
(Gray and ) .
Manson, 2005,p:192 ) (Pickett, 2005
).(Okab.2013
"
"
). 2006 (341
) 2011 (11 :
.
:
) (2000) 2007 (24 : )
( 2008
.1 ) .( Statistical Analysis
.2 ) .( Cybernetics
.3 ).(Statistical Sampling
.4 ) . ( System Analysis
)(Audit Planner )
(TICOM
-128-
11 2015 1
.7
.
.8
.
.) :
(2000 ) (2006
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.
.5
.
.6
.
:
) ..2003 - 266
(276) ( 2009 ) 2008 (61:
) .(2010
) . (2011
)(2012
) : (2005
.1
.
.2
.
.3 .
.4
.
.5 .
.6 .
-129-
...
.
.
:
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
.
.4
.
.5
.
.6
.
: :
) (
)
= ( 0.936
) (2:
)(2
: 0.827 .
0.899
: .
0.901
: .
.0.60
:
) : ) (5 )((1
/ ) (3
) (1.333 .
:
) .100 ( 5
5-3.67
3.66-2.34
2.33-1
-130-
11 2015 1
)(3
30-22
40-31
50- 41
51
3-1
6-4
10-7
11
26
25
12
4
67
2
40
18
7
67
5-1
10-6
15-11
16
11
19
23
14
67
18
33
10
6
67
18
49
67
: :
) (3
30-22 40-31
%76 %73
%39
%37
%18
%6
%100
%3
%60
%27
%10
%100
%17
%28
%34
%21
%100
%27
%49
%15
%9
%100
%27
%73
%100
28
30
9
12
79
1
49
23
6
79
16
22
24
17
79
20
32
15
12
79
23
56
79
%35
%38
%12
%15
%100
%1
%62
%29
%8
%100
%20
%28
%30
%22
%100
%25
%41
%19
%15
%100
%29
%71
%100
-131-
...
6-4 %49
%41
3-1 %27
%25
%73 %71
.
.
%60 %62
%37
10-6 15-11
%28 %34 %28 %30
16 %21 %22
.
.
)(4
.
: :
4.1045
.83728
3.8987
1.09304
82.090
77.974
4.2836
-132-
.86700
4.1139
.84713
85.672
82.278
11 2015 1
4.0746
.80366
4.1392
.87316
81.492
82.784
4.0149
.94536
4.3797
.73909
80.298
87.594
4.0597
.99819
4.2278
.69705
81.194
84.556
3.9701
.98427
3.8481
.66194
79.402
76.962
4.0746
1.00474
3.5063
.88973
81.492
70.126
3.8657
.91941
3.9114
.87983
77.314
78.228
3.7313
10
3.5672
1.06717
3.7595
1.10029
74.626
75.190
1.14447
3.5696
.79556
71.344
71.392
11
3.3582
.
-133-
1.21483
3.4684
.76520
67.164
69.368
...
3.7761
1.24098
12
3.7342
1.08260
75.522
74.684
13
4.4925
.74616
4.2405
.77153
89.850
84.810
14
3.7313
1.10895
3.7722
.59806
74.626
75.444
15
4.0448
1.01860
3.6203
.92409
80.896
72.406
16
4.2090
0.97755
4.0633
.92462
84.180
81.266
3.9599
0.48163
3.8908
0.50195
79.198
77.816
: :
3.8358
1.27442
3.6456
.78508
76.716
72.912
4.4925
.94345
3.6582
1.45784
89.850
73.164
3.8806
-134-
1.17451
3.7468
.83924
77.612
74.936
11 2015 1
4.1493
1.23403
4.0506
1.19721
82.986
81.012
3.8507
1.22169
3.6076
.89754
77.014
72.152
4.1045
1.08899
3.4304
.96985
82.090
68.608
4.2537
1.13275
4.2152
1.05819
85.074
84.304
4.4030
.93840
4.2911
.98907
88.060
85.822
3.7910
1.20022
3.6835
.72579
75.820
73.670
10
4.0448
1.27247
4.3544
.90636
80.896
87.088
11
4.1343
-135-
1.19209
4.3038
.85266
82.686
86.076
...
12
3.9851
1.23696
3.6709
.88754
79.702
73.418
13
4.6119
.79687
4.1646
1.01817
92.238
83.292
14
4.1194
1.14842
4.3671
.86495
82.388
87.342
4.1183
0.78331
3.9421
0.61616
82.366
78.842
: :
3.7463
1.29502
3.7215
.76689
74.926
74.430
4.1791
1.15372
4.0759
1.22759
83.582
81.518
3.6418
-136-
1.23952
3.5316
.85987
72.836
70.632
11 2015 1
3.9254
1.28291
4.1519
1.15568
78.508
83.038
3.6567
1.24988
3.4177
1.05742
73.134
68.354
4.2090
1.10833
3.9620
1.19232
84.180
79.240
" " .
3.7612
1.23202
3.5190
.93179
75.224
70.380
4.0149
1.31992
4.1013
1.04507
80.298
82.026
3.7164
1.32352
3.6962
.95212
74.328
73.924
10
4.1940
1.14467
4.0886
1.11159
83.880
81.772
11
3.9104
-137-
1.16426
3.6582
.93213
78.208
73.164
...
12
4.0299
1.32539
4.1899
1.03869
80.598
83.798
13
3.8209
1.24225
3.3671
1.13428
76.418
67.342
3.9082
: :
) (4
) (3.3582
) (4.4925 )(0.74616
) (1.24098 )(67.164
) (89.850
) (3.4684 )(4.3797
) (0.59806
) (1.10029 )(69.368
) (87.594 )
(
-
-
0.93132
3.8062
0.59799
78.164
76.124
.
.
) (3.7910 ) (4.6119
) (0.79687 ) (1.27442
) (75.820) (92.238
-138-
11 2015 1
.
.
.
.
) (3.4304
) (4.3671 )(0.72579
) (1.45784 )(72.152
) (87.342 )
(
.
)
(
) (3.6418 ) (4.2090
) (1.10833 ) ( (1.32539
) (72.836) (84.180
) (3.4177 )(4.1899
) (.76689
) (1.22759 )(67.342
) (83.798 -
-
-139-
...
R )(0.790) & (0.781
.
F
R2 R
:
.
) (
) (
)
(
) (0.05
) (
)
( .
).(0.05
B Beta
)
( )
(
)
( B . Beta
)(3.9599
) (3.8908
) (0.48163) (0.50195
) (79.198) (77.816
) (4.1183) (3.9421
) (0.78331)(0.61616
) (82.366) (78.842
)(3.9082
)(3.8062
) (0.59799) (0.93132
) (78.164) (76.124
.
: :
:
.
) (5 )
(
F
)(63.207) & (49.993
) (0.000 R2
) (0.625) & (0.610
)(
) (%62.5) & (%61
-140-
11 2015 1
)(5
.
0.610
0.781
49.993
*0.000
) (R
)(R
F
(Sig.) F
2
0.625
0.790
63.207
*0.000
Beta
0.245
0.156
0.107
0.126
0.205
0.626
0.096
0.087
0.740
0.645
0.880
0.243
*2.279 **1.561
*9.180
*7.166
t
)*(Sig.
0.123
*0.025
*0.000 *0.000
* )(0.05 >
** )(0.05 >
) (
)
( .
)
(
) (%62.5 )
( )
(
) (%59.9 .
.Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis
) (5
)
( ) (%59.5
-141-
...
)(6
.
t
t
)*(Sig.
)(R2
0.000
*9.769
0.595
.
0.000
*114.957
0.599
.
0.000
*63.207
0.625
.
* ).(0.05 >
)(7
2
R
R
T T Sig
0.096 0.310 0.011 1.9966
*2.625
* )(0.05 >
) (0.310
) (0.609
. R2
) (0.096
) (0.371
.
:
.
:
.
) (7
) T( ) (2.625) (6.736
)T
( ) (1.9966 ) (1.9905
) (0,05
R
)(8
2
R
R
T T Sig
-142-
11 2015 1
(.
ANOVA
) (9 ) F(
) (1.217 ) F(
)
.(0,05
:
)
(.
:
.
) (8
) T( ) (9.769) (10.722
)T
( ) (1.9966 ) (1.9905
) (0,05
R
) (0.771
) (0.774
. R2
) (0.595
) (0.595
.
:
.
:
::
:
.1
.
.2
.
.3
)(9
F F Sig
0.307
1.90
1.217
:
)
-143-
...
.4
.5
.6
.7
.
.8
.
.9
.
.10
.
: :
.1
.
.2
.
.
.
.
-144-
11 2015 1
.3
.4
.5
.6
.
.7
.
.8
.
.9
.
.10
.
.
.
.
.
"(2009)
- "
:.
) "(2009 "
. .
"
-145-
...
"
"
.2009
"( 2004)
"
.
"(2006)
" 3 .
)" (2010
"
10 2
"(2007)
"
.
"(2007)
"
8-7
"" " .
(2014)
http:// www. fxnewstoday.ae
Available at:
(2014)
Available at :http://www.ase.com.jo
"(2004)
"
28-26
.
" (2004)
"
.
" (2008)
.
"(2011)
" 34 89
.
) " (2001 "
.
" (2009)
"
.
" (2000)
"
.
"(2000)
"
.
" (2006)
"
. .
" (2008)
"
.16
" (2013)
-
"
21 .2
" (2000)
" .
" (2012)
"
.
"
.
" (2012)
-146-
11 2015 1
" (2010)
"
.
" (2011)
"
":
"
.
" (2010)
"
. 9
" (2011)
"
.
" (2011)
"
25.8
" (2004)
"
.
" (2012)
"
.
. "(2011 ) .
:
"
.
"(2005 )
"
.
" (2004) :
" 2 .
" (2011)
"
19.1
" (2009)
"
.
" (2007 )
:
"
21
2 .182-151:
"(2003)
" 29 . 1
management as Creation in the management and business
Damascus.
-147-
...
Algeria
application
e-governance
in
human
resources
of
distribution, Amman.
Palestine: Gaza.
pp: 151-182.
-148-
2015 1 11
House, Cairo, p. 9.
and
Administrative
Sciences,
Zaytoonh
University of Jordan.
Dahmash,
Naem
and
thahir,
(2004),
"the
220.
Shehata, Hassan, (2000), "the audit and control assets in light
Ibrahim,
(2000),
introduction
systems
systems,"
and
administrative
data,
"information
Aldar
Alexandria.
Taha, Reem Oqab Hussein, (2013), "The role of support for e-
at :http://www.ase.com.jo.
Guide Saudi Companies, (2014), listed companies in the Saudi
Ahmad
helmi,(2009),
"
The
development
Merbah, Algeria.
Yahya, Ziad Hashem and Alhobaita, Mohsen Qassim, (2004),
of
integrated
-149-
accounting
information",
Journal
of
...
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants
Available at : www.aicpa.org.
opportunities
Education Limited.
for
future
research",
International
Hazar&
Triki,
Mohamed.(2013)."Accounting
Application
History
of
Artificial
University of Washington.
Kamil,Omoteso.(2012)."The
Performance
Available at : http://www-formal.stanford.ed.
Ting.(2006)."The
Management
on
eyrolles, Paris.
application
of
artificial
39 : 84908495.
Yohann,
D.
Aboa.(2014)."
Continuous
Auditing:
at : http://dc.etsu.edu/honors/209.
Proceedings
of
the
World
Congress
on
-150-
2015 1 11
The Impact of the Application of Expert Systems in Commercial Banks on Electronic Audit Procedures,
from the viewpoint of public accountants. A Comparative Study in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan
and Saudi Arabia
Sulieman Hussein Al-Beshtawi, Metab Aiesh AL-Baqmi
ABSTRACT
This study was a comparative study between commercial banks in each of the hashemite kingdom of
Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, it is (15 bank) and (11 bank) respectively, in order to clarify the effect of
the application of expert systems to electronic audit procedures and its role in increasing the
efficiency of the electroniaudit process, from the viewpoint of public accountants. The questionnaire
was distributed to a sample of auditors (75) in Jordan and (100) in Saudi Arabia, the questionnaires
analysis by statistical methods: cronbach alpha , pearson correlation coefficient, spearman- brown
formula, multiple and simple linear regression analysis, stepwise multiple regression analysis ,
measures of descriptive statistics frequencies, percentages and averages and standard deviations.
The study concluded agreement between the two sample (Jordan and Saudi Arabia), that the
requirements for the application of expert systems in commercial banks need for the preservation of
their assets and files that contain information and statements of the Bank's work, and reduce the risk
of human and material accompanying measures to provide services, and retention of paper documents
to prevent fraud or forgery damage or loss. And the application of expert systems in commercial
banks many benefits help in electronic audit procedures, like : speed in implementing the tasks and
get the data and information necessary for a statement of opinion about the bank's services and
compatibility with international accounting and auditing standards and regulations and instructions
imposed by the bank and the fairness and credibility of financial statements and reports, it also helps
in enhancing the efficiency and increase the quality of the audit and the provision of effort, time and
costs for the implementation of his plan and audit procedures.
KEYWORDS: Expert Systems (Requirements, Quality), Electronic Audit Procedures in Commercial
Banks.
__________________________________________________
1
Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Israa University. Jordan
dr_sulieman@yahoo.com
2
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Business Administration. Tabuk University.
KSA
malbugami@ut.edu.sa
Received on 17/6/2014 and Accepted for Publication on 18/9/2014.
-151-