NIV October 13, 2014 Mr. Rob Peters Forbes Miami, LLC fo The Forbes Company 100 Galleria Offcentre, Suite 427 ‘Southfield, Michigan 48304 Re: Report 1 - Subsurface Exploration & Geotechnical Engineering Study Proposed Miami Worldcenter - Mastor Retail NE 1® and NE 2” Avenues Between FEC ROW and NE 10" Street Miami, Florida NV5 Project No. 148568 Dear Mr. Peters: NV5, Inc. (formerly KACO), submits this report in fulilment of the scope of services described in our Proposal No, 14-0093rev dated July 2, 2014. The work was. ‘authorized in our contract with you dated June 26, 2014, This report describes our Understanding of the project, presents our evaluations, and provides our professional ‘opinions and recommendations for foundation design and construction for the project. Director of Ge Florida Lice Florida License NO, 51641 uyONR Enclosures! Distribution: 2 Copies to Addressee via U.S. Mail 4 Copy to Addressee via Email 41 Copy to NVS File‘TABLE OF CONTENTS ‘SECTION 1.0. SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION. 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK... 3,0 _ FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING .. 3.1 BORINGS. 32. LABORATORY TESTING 4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS. 4.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 42 GEOLOGIGHAZARDS 5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS... 6.0 EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION... 6.1. FOUNDATION SUPPORT. 6.41.1 10Level Podium. 6.1.2_3-Lovel Bloomingdales 62. ESTIMATED SETTLEMENT. 621 10-Level Podium. 8.22 3-Level Bloomingdales 63. BASEMENT TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION 6.3.1 Basement Excavation Support 6.32 Basement Dewatering 6.33. Stabilly of Basement Excavation. 6.4. IMPACTS TO ADJACENT METRO MOVER FACILITIES 13 685 MISCELLANEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 13 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS.... 7.1. SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING. 14 72, FOUNDATION SUPPORT... 15 7.2.1 ACIP Pile Foundations. 15 7.2.2 Shallow Foundations (Block C Podium) 19 7.2.3 Miscellaneous Structures. = 20 7.8 GROUND FLOOR SLABS. 20 74 BASEMENT AND RETAINING WALLS, 2t 75 PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN. 21 7.8.1 Flexible Pavements. 2 7.5.2_Rigid Pavements 22 7.6 SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION. : 22 77 EXCAVATION AND DEWATERING 2 78 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS. 23 8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS... 9.0 CLOSURE.ir Rob Ptore toner 19,2014 Forbes amt Lc. Toe Page 2 Foro of Geolooinics Study Mil Wortsonte MastorToworRetal vs Pree No: 145866 EIGURES Drawing 1 Site Vicinity Map & Test Location Plan Drawing 2 Generalized Subsurface Profle (Sheets 2A through 24) ‘APPENDICES: Append Boring Logs (A-1 through A-133) ‘AppendxB Grain Size Distribution Curves (B- through B-14) NWSMe Rob ators tober 13, 2014 orbs Mami Page 1 Fepo of Gnotoanica Stu) Mam Wedécentor Mastor Reta INVBPraject No: 148566, 4.0 SITE AND PROJECT INFORMATION Based on our review of September 19, 2014 40 percent Design Development project drawings prepared by Ekus Manfredi Architects we Understand the Miami Werldcenter (MWC) project is to be developed over 3-1/2 city blocks in downtown Miami, Florida, bounded by the FEC Railroad right-of-way and NE 10" streets to the south and north respectively, and NE 1 and 2” avenues to the west and east respectively as depicted in Drawing 1 and shown in the figure below. These blocks are collectively known as Phase IA and referred to as Blocks C, D, F, and H The sites are mostly asphalt paved parking lots with sparse trees. There are two single-story buildings in the block between the FEC ROW and NE 8” street, and two in the block between NE 9” and NE 10" streets. The Metro Mover rail lines and Freedom Tower and Park West stations are immediately east of the ‘eastern boundary of the sites. Based on an undated site survey prepared by Perimeter Surveying and Mapping that we were provided, the ground surface elevation is estimated to be between about +9.5 and +13 feet with respect to the 1929 National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). VSMe Rob Potore ciober 13, 2014 Fore Na Lc Page 2 Fepor of Geotoctica Stuy Mam Wedécnter Master Reta! IMV3 Project No 148566, This report is for the common podium that will house retail, parking, and recreational amenities. The podium will be 10 levels, except for a retail Bulding in the western two-thirds or so of the southernmost block that will be a 3-levels: Bloomingdales store with an amenity deck above. Based on discussion with the structural engineer structural loads could be between about 2,500 to 4,000 kips for the podium, We assume ground floor slabs will be loaded to about 200 pounds per square foot The project will also construct four towers ranging in height from about 3UU to 700 feet. Tower 1 will be 538 feet tall with a footprint of about 65 by 236 feet in the northwestern comer of the intersection of NE 10” Street and NE 1* Avenue in Block C, Tower 2 will occupy the western one-third of the Block between NE 6" and NE 9" streets, and wil rise to a height of 706 feet. it will have a curved footprint that, except for required setbacks, will occupy most of the north-south dimension of the block. The tover will be about 90 feet wide at its northern and southem ends, widening to about 120 feet near its center. It wil measure of about 275 feet along the curved centerline. Tower 3 will also have a curved footprint that will be oriented in a northeast- southwest direction. That tower will be about 70 feet wide at its northeastem and southwestern ends, widening to about 110 fest near its center, and will measure of about 220 feet along its centerline. Tower 3 will be 365 feet tall. Tower 4 is to be constructed in a future phase of the MWC project and will be located on northwestern comer of the intersection of the FEC ROW and NE 2 Avenue. The current plans do not expressly state the footprint dimensions or height ofthis tower. Based on the renderings available, it appears the tower will be of similar dimensions to Tower 3. Geotechnical studies for the towers have been performed and reported separately. At this time we do not understand there to be any significant basements planned, We do understand however that two tunnels are to be constructed. The first is from the mall service area in the middle of Block D to a small basement beneath Tower 2, The second tunnel connects a mall service area beneath Tower 3 in the northeastem comer of Block F to a sevice core beneath the Bloomingdales store and another service core in the central western portion of Block F. The 40 percent plans indicate the basementtunnel finished floor will have ‘a maximum dopth of about 11 to 12 fest below the retail fist floor level. Based on present site grades, some nominal amounts of fil soils maybe required to raise the Site grade for flood protection purposes. NVMe Rab tors ‘cote 13,2014 Forbes Mar LC Page 3 FRoport of Geotocacal Sty Mian Woracenter Mester Rea MVE Project No: 146860 2.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK ‘The purpose of our services on this project is to explore the subsurface conditions in order to provide recommendations for foundation design and construction, Specicaly this report provides + Drawings showing boring locations, a graphic summary of the generalized subsurface conditions, and boring logs with detalled descriptions of the materials encountered. '¢ Discussion of generalized subsurface conditions at the site including groundwater levels, + Discussion of feasible foundation type(s) for the proposed construction. + Design parameters for the recommended foundation types, including vertical and lateral load resistance. + Estimates of foundation settlements. ‘+ Recommended design parameters for below grade and retaining walls + Recommendations for site preparation and grading, including the re-use of site- excavated materials for fil, fil placement and compaction, and slab subgrade preparation, ‘+ Recommendations for flexible and rigid pavements + Recommendations for short period and ‘-second spectral accelerations for seismic design ofthe structures. + Construction considerations including excavation support and dewatering, and impacts for adjacent structures. 3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 3.4. BORINGS The subsurface conditions were explored with 50 engineering test borings driled to depths between 25 and 200 feet below existing grade at the approximate locations shown on Drawing 1. The test locations were marked and identified in the field by NVS. We note that the boring numbers result from the numbering system that was adopted for the overall field exploration program for the entire MWC project. An additional boring noted as FB-51 (future boring) Is to be diiled to 150 feet below grade in the itheastern porlion of Block C upon the demolition of the existing building in that area, The borings were dilled in accessible locations with a truck-mounted drill rig utlizing the rotary wash method. Samples of the subsurface materials were recovered at roughly 2-foot intervals within the upper 10 feet of the borings and at approximately 6- {oot intervals thereatter using a Standard Penetration Test splt-spoon sampler (SPT) in ‘substantial accordance with ASTM D-1688, “Standard Test Method for Standard Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils.” This test procedure drives a 1.4- inch |. split-tube sampler into the subsurface profile using a 140-pound hammer falling NVWr Rob Peter October 18, 2014 Forbes Mam Lc. Pages ‘Report of Gectotica Stody Miami Werkconter Master Reta VB Praect No: 148566 20 inches. The total number of blows required to drive the sampler the second and third ssbcinch increments is the SPT N-value, in blows per foot, and is an indication of material strength. In addition to the SPT testing, 2.8-inch-diameter coring was performed at various elevations within the borings using an NXsize core barrel. The ‘coring was generally performed in runs five feet long. Upon completion of the borings, the boreholes were backfiled with soil cuttings and the upper few feet closed with ‘coment grout. ‘The soillock samples recovered trom the borings were classtied by a geotechnical engineer. The collected samples were later re-examined to confi field Classifications and to select samples for laboratory testing. Visual soil classifications were made in accordance with ASTM D2487 and ASTM D2488. The results of the classification and consequent generalized stratification are shown in Drawing 2 (sheets 2A through 2H), the generalized subsurface profile, and in the records of test borings in ‘Appendix A (sheets A-t through A-133). Strata contacts shown on these drawings are ‘approximate, The boring data reflect conditions at the specific test location only, and at the time the borings were drilled In addition to the general stratification shown on the drawings, also presented are ‘additional data related to the rock coring. The percent recovery (REC) shown is the {otal length of material recovered expressed as a percentage of the core run length. ‘The Rock Quality Designation (RQD) is the total lenath of pieces of rock four inches or ‘greater in length, expressed as a percentage ofthe total length of the core run, Finally, the boring logs present also the time required in seconds to advance each foot of rock core, 3.2 LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing consisted of determination of the following: natural moisture content (ASTM D-2216) grain size distribution (ASTM D-422) Unconfined compressive strength of rock cores (ASTM D-2938) ‘ spliting tensile strength of rock cores (ASTM D-3967) ‘The laboratory test results are presented and discussed under the subsurface conditions section, Section 5 ofthis report. ‘4,0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 41 REGIONAL GEOLOGY Miami-Dade County is located on the southern flank of a stable carbonate platform on which thick deposits of limestones, dolomites and evaporites have NWSMr Rob Peto Cetober 13, 2014 Fore Ma, LLC Pages Repo of Geotochnical Stay Many Werécotr Maser Real vB Projet No. 146566 accumulated. The upper two hundred feet of the subsurface profile is composed predominantly of limestone and quartz sand. These sediments were deposited during several glacial and interglacial stages when the ocean was at elevations higher than present. In many portions of Miami-Dade County, surface sand deposits of the Pamlico Formation are encountered. The Pamlico sands overlie the Miami Limestone. In ‘western Miami-Dade County, portions of the Everglades Region interfinger with the Pamlico sand. The Everglades soll consists of peat and calcareous silt (marl), ‘The Miami Limestone is a soft to moderately hard, white, porous to very porous, sometimes sandy, ooliic calcareous cemented grainstone. The formation outerops in portions of Miami-Dade County. The Miami Limestone has a maximum thickness of about 35 feet along the Atlantic Coastal Ridge and thins sharply near the coastline and more gradually in a westerly direction, The Miami Limestone was formed about 130,000 years ago ata time when the sea level was twenty-five feet higher than it is today. This environment facilitated formation of concentrically layered sand sized carbonate grains called oolites. These grains formed by repeated precipitation of jum carbonate around the nucleus of a sand or shell grain, ‘The Miami Limestone can be separated into two facies: the barrier bar oolitic, facies and the tidal shoal limestone facies. The barrier bar facies is characterized by lenses of oolitc limestone separated by intermittent, 1-inch thick or less, uncemented sand layers (cross-bedded limestone), Zones of higher porosity are characteristic and parallel the bedding planes of the cross-bedded limestone, The tidal shoal limestone facies is characterized by a distinct lack of bedding planes. In addition, burrowing organisms have churned previously deposited sediments, which have resulted in high porosity channels in the rock. These ancient channels give the rock an appearance of a hardened sponge in some areas. ‘The Fort Thompson Formation underlies the Miami Limestone, and includes: sand, sandstone, and limestone. The upper zones of the Fort Thompson Formation ‘consist of sand having a thickness ranging from 6 to 35 feet. The remainder of the formation consists of coraline limestone, quartz sandstone, sandy limestone and freshwater limestone, The type of soils within the formation and the degree of ‘cementation vary with lateral extent and depth. ‘The Fort Thompson Formation is underiain by the Tamiami Formation. The ‘Tamiami Formation consists of sands, sis, clays, and sometime fossiiferous limestone. ‘The upper portions of the Tamiami Formation are permeable and make up the lower reaches of the Biscayne Aquifer. This formation ranges in thickness from zero to 300 feet in South Florida, NWIMr Rob ators ‘sober 3, 2004 orb Mar LC. Pages| eno of Gaotoonica Stat Mian Werscener Master Real VB Project No 146506 42 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ‘The South Florida area is relatively free of geologic hazards. The region is not considered seismically active. Consequently hazards such as ground shaking, liquefaction, and ground rupture that are normally associated with earthquake and other seismic activity are generally not a factor for the design of structure foundations in South Florida, Based on the 2009 International Building Code, a Site Class C classification is considered appropriate for this sit. Karst topography that Is associated with the formation of sinkholes and other underground discontinuities in carbonate rock formations in the central and northern portions of Florida is generally not found in South Florida. Any discontinuities in the limestone due to solutioning of the rock are typically very limited in vertical and lateral extent and are usually not considered a factor in the design of foundations in the local practice ‘5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS In general, the subsurface conditions encountered in our borings are consistent with the geology described above, The detailed subsurface conditions are presented graphically in the attached generalized subsurface profile (Drawing 2) and in more detail fon the records of test boring sheets in Appendix A. The subsurface conditions disclosed by the borings can be generalized as described below. Layer sand with Limestone Fragm ‘This layer consists of sand with limestone fragments, and silly sand that is 2 to 41 feat thiok in the borings. The near-surface materials that contain. more limestone fragments are likely fil materials, The sity sands have fines contents up to about 30 percent. SPT N-values recorded in this layer range from 2 to {greater than 60 blows per foot (bpf) with an average value of 24 bpf indicating a layer that is on average medium dense. Layer 2 ~ Limestone: ‘This layer comprises limestone and is about § to 20 feet thick in the borings. The stratum is very soft to very hard with SPT Nevalues ranging from 2 to greater than 50 bpf with an average value of 23 bpf. ayer 3 - Sand and Silty Sand: Beneath the limestone the borings encountered sand and silty sand that is about 10 to 25 feet thick in the borings. The more silly zones of this stratum contain up to fines up to 12 percent fines. The stratum is on average medium dense with an average SPT N-value of 23 bpf. The values range between one (1) and greater than 50 bpt. NSi Rob Poors ‘tober 13,2014 Foss ham Lc Page Feport of Gealactaca Sty Mia Woracener Mastor Roar AVE Project No. 148566, Layer 4 — Limestone with interbedded Sand Layers ‘This layer consists of lmestone with interbedded sand layers and extends to the termination depths of the deeper borings, The SPT N-values recorded in this stratum average at least 42 bpf with the values ranging from less than one (weight of sample hammer) to greater than 50 bpf. Unconfined compressive strength tests performed on rock cores obtained from this layer retumed values ‘of 550 to 6,570 pounds per square inch (psi). The average of the test results is 3,563 psi. Spilting tensile tests returned corresponding values of 403, 1,037, and 682 psi ‘Groundwater: Groundwater was encountered in the borings at depths of about between 6 and 10 feet below the existing ground surface, with an average depth to groundwater of about 8.5 feet below the existing grade. The groundwater depths correspond to elevations between zero and about +5.9 feet NGVD, with the average ‘groundwater elevation being around +3 feet NGVD. ‘We note the high reading of Elevation +5.9 feet NGVD likely does not represent a stabilized groundwater level but rather a water level that was disturbed by driling, (On average, stabilized groundwater levels in the general vicinity of the project are expected to vary between elevations +0 to +4 feet NGVD, the variations being primarily as a result of tidal fluctuations and seasonal rainfall, Storm and hurricane events and construction activities also result in variations in the ‘groundwater levels. Notwithstanding the variations acknowledged, we anticipate that groundwater at the site will generally be encountered within the upper 10 or 0 feet of the existing ground surface. From a design standpoint, we note that historically high groundwater levels of +7 10 #8 feet NGVD have been recorded as a result of major storm events in Miami based on records kept since about 1939. Project designers should use this information to select a ‘prudent” high water level for design. The resuits of the physical laboratory tests are summarized in Table 1 below. ‘The grain size distribution curves are presented in Appendix B as sheets B-1 through B- 14, For the layers described above, Table 2 below summarizes our estimates of engineering parameters considered pertinent to the design of the project foundations. We note that the valuae of allowable eide shear ectimatod in Table 2 are based on our experience and laboratory data as well as data for similar rock that we have tested. NWS‘tober 13,2014 Page 8 NVB Project No. 148566, Table 1 - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS. Natuat |_Porcant Boring | Sample | Moisture | Finer Than | Total Unit | Qurweratvs | Sonat Number | ‘Dept | Content | "Uso. | "Weight |Camprseve | Tensia, iy | GH" | amsieve | “wen | Soag | Gah Bi | ea] ar | : 5 ; a s = 63 _| 2a | 90 | 08 : : 63_[ as | tz 1 — 9 = 64-0 | eo = : = ease | v6 = = = ba [Terns | 18 E ic | a0 —| es} 62139 | ao E : : es—| eat tar | = 5 2 s3—| sar] 73 3 ae az 63 | 241 wz | es e : : 3 | oz [2 | 29 = - 5 eat rates | 38 = 18 18 78 be—[ 0-2 | er | 50 zs z z [ge faists [as] 28 = = : a 5 ei ent se—| apa : = siz [wor | - Tass | a8 = Bis [-F | ws [6 : s S13[ age 60 [ air : : Sis [ga] tap [mer : 2 : eis_| aa] oe | a8 : Sir | aie | —t0 : = eir_| wows : a5 | 450 S1e—| 3-100 [18 = 1323 —[ 380 a a - . Sie-[ 8:8 | wet at : Stee atta : 2 E ea—[a 1 | a1 z 3 ba|-o2 | wr [ps = : sa |—ga—| tee [ar 5 = Sa_| weiw | os Fs wsa_| 650 a Sa | ea us| ais z oo E : a = : : b2r_|ess—| 77 = 3193 0 Bar| 40 [es : = Bz 20 = Sar 35 S : B35 as E = 636 ‘sr = S28 a 2 w55_| 53601 as B30 as | aa zl : eat 102 | at zi ear 7 ts : Ba zo | : = a iis} ase : : NSie ab ators Cetober 13,2014 Forbes Mami LL. Pago 8 Report of Gectctnca Std ~ Miami Wordcente Master Rota AVS Project No: 146666 ‘TABLE 2- SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED PERTINENT ENGINEERING PARAMETERS _ |. SPT Modulus | Unconfined | Allowable ‘of | Compressive | Side Layer ‘avg, | Elasticity | Strength | Shear 10 | _Deseription ANG | isfy (ust) | thst 1_| Filand Surfical Sand 24_|— 500 ot 2[Limestone [ 23 | 70,000. 300 3 [Sand 23 | 500 z - ¥0,000— 4 | Limestone with Sand + [42 | "8560_| 300-350 - 6.0 EVALUATION AND DISCUSSION 6.1 FOUNDATION SUPPORT We consider the site suitable for the proposed project from a geotechnical perspective. The primary concern for foundation design and construction include ‘suppor of the proposed new structure loads without unacceptable settlement. Further discussion of foundation options for the proposed project is presented below. Detailed foundation design and construction recommendations including sizes, lengths, and axial and lateral load capacities are presented in the recommendations section of this report. 644 10-Level Podium Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the borings we conclude that deep foundation support is the most appropriate for the 10-evel podium. Consistent with current practice in the South Florida area we consider augered, cast-in-place (ACIP) piles to be the most feasible foundation type for this project. Other deep foundation systems such as driven piles and drilled shafts are not considered feasible. In addition to the noise nuisance, vibrations from driven pile foundations could adversely impact existing buildings on the site as well as those on adjacent properties. ‘Additionally, it would be difficult to penetrate the hard upper zones in the limestone rock at the site to sufficient depths to provide adequate uplift capacity on the driven piles. Driled shafts are typically economically feasible and attractive only where they are used to carry very large loads that sufficiently justify the slower instalation rates and other installation dificultes attendant with such foundations, The podium can be supported on piles 24 inches in diameter and founded at depths of 65 to 70 feet below the existing grade. We were requested to evaluate the potential use of shallow foundations to ‘support the podium. The near-surface Layer 2 limestone in the majority of the borings ‘suggests that in general shallow foundations are technically feasible for support of the NWSir Rob Peters Cuter 13, 2014 Fortes tems LLC Pago 10 Foportof Geototnea Study Mam Werlcontor Master Rota IvBPreect No: 48866 10-level podium structures. However, several considerations would have to be made prior to using shallow foundations. ‘Shallow foundation use would however require that the 10-level_ podium foundation loads be transferred to the limestone layer and that there is a sufficiently thick layer of limestone present beneath the footings to support those loads. It is anticipated that foundations for the 10-level podium would be 3 or so feet thick. ‘Consequently, in many cases the foundation excavations would result in the bottoms of the footings resting on the limestone. From our review of the boring data, it appears that the Block C subsurface conditions are most amenable to the use of shallow foundations for the podium, In this block, the boring data indicate the rock is uniformly ‘loser to the existing ground surface, and maintains a fairly consistent thickness of at least 15 to 20 feet. In other cases however, such as at locations represented by borings B-5, B-16, B-18, B-20, B-26, and B-27, the use of spread footings could present constructabilty challenges. At these locations the depth to the top of rock varies between 8 and 13 feet below grade. To effectively transfer the foundation loads to the rock, the overburden ‘material between the bottom of footing elevation and the top of limestone would have to be over-excavated and replaced with No. 57 stone. These excavations require a larger footprint than the foundation footprint and would require shoring. Additionally, portions of the excavation and backfiling would take place beneath the groundwater table at locations where the top of rock is below the groundwater table, ‘At locations such as represented by borings B-13, B-20, and to a lesser degree, B36, we do not consider the use of shall foundations technically feasible. While the top (of the upper limestone is fairy shallow at these locations, it is not thick enough to provide adequate support for the 10-level podium. Therefore at such locations piles would be required. This further raises the question as to how to establish with a reasonable degree of certainty, that an adequate thickness of the upper rock exists ‘even at locations where itis found at a high elevation. The fact that the upper rock thins out in the three locations identified above, suggests that it could occur in other locations as well ‘Also to be considered are the foundation conditions at the basement tunnels. ‘The tunnel finished floor will be some 11 to 12 feet below the retail first floor Consequently, it is expected that excavations for the footings could extend another 2 to 3 feet below this level. Ata location such as depicted by Boring 8-20 conditions, such excavation would remove almost all of the limestone, We note that one of the tunnels that will run east-west within Block F could be close to the Boring B-20 location, Itis for the reasons above that we have concluded pile foundations are the most appropriate for the 10-level podium except for possibly Block C. NVMr Rob Potore| Cutober13, 2014 Forbos Nam LC Pogo 11 Repo of Gootectnica Stuy Miami WerécenterMastor Retail MVS Prot No 146866, 6.1.2. 3-Level Bloomingdales This store can be supported on shallow foundations after preparation of the site ‘as recommended in the later sections of this report 6.2. ESTIMATED SETTLEMENT 24 10-Level Podium Based on areal base pressures of 1 to 2 ksf, we estimate that the podium piles or footings founded on limestone will experience maximum settlements of on the order of cone (1) inch, with differential settlements on the order of ¥% to % inch. The granular nature of the subsurface materials at the site will result in the majority of the podium settlement occurring during construction and for a short time period (typically less than two months) following substantial completion of the top level. Additional small settlements of the structure could occur after structural completion as interior walls, Cladding, finishes etc. are added to the building. The settiements of the structure are expected to be relatively uniform. As the structure height increases it should become stiffer thereby reducing the potential for differential edge-to-center settlements. Differential movements of the pile cap system will result in redistribution of loads in the superstructure and among the pile caps. We understand that podium and tower construction will cour simultaneously. AS the towers rise above the podium, columns closest to the tower foundations could experience additional settioment due to the areal influence of settlement from the tower foundations. The zone of influence and the rate of settlement attenuation away from the footprint of the towers is determined by the magnitude of the tower settlement, and the geometry and layout of the tower foundations, in particular the location of heavy cores with respect to the edges of the footprint In general we expect the settioment at the edge of the tower to be about 60 percent of that near the center. Consequently the podium columns closest to the tower ‘could experience an additional % to one (1) inch of settlement from the towers depending on which tower is closest. On other projects this issue has been addressed by delaying podium construction until substantial completion ofthe heavier tower. Since this will not be feasible for this project, one of two options is available. The podium bay closest to the tower in question can be delayed until the settioment from the tower has ‘mostly taken place, or it can be designed to accommodate the settlement. From our experience with downtown Miami sites, a settlement of an inch or so will generally dissipate within a horizontal distance of 30 feet or less. ‘The settlement estimates discussed above are applicable also for podium footings founded on limestone or on No. 67 stone backiill above limestone. NWIMr ob Petre Cutober 2, 2014 Forbes ham Lc Page 12 ‘Report of Geatctnc! Stay Many Wodtcono Maser Rota IVD Projet No. 148556 6.22 3-Level Bloomingdales ‘The S-evel Bloomingdales store should experience total settlements on the order of % inch or less and differential settlements on the order of % inch or less. These settlements are expected to occur during construction and for a short time period ater. ‘Additional small settlements of the structure could occur after structural completion 2s interior walls, cladding, finishes etc. are added to the building, 3. BASEMENT TUNNEL CONSTRUCTION For construction of basements in South Florida, consideration has to be given not only to the support of the basement excavation, but as well to methods that wil facilitate 1 dry basement excavation during construction. The proposed basement tunnel floor will be at 11 to 12 feet below the retall first floor and the excavations are expected to ‘extend another 2 to 3 feet below that depth, The sections below present a general discussion of the basement construction issues, 6.3.1 Basement Excavation Support Basement excavation support in the Miami area is typically achieved through sheet piles, tangent or secant ACIP pile walls, and DSM walls. Other methods including slunry walls, soi-freezing, and soldier piles and lagging are also available, but have found much more limited use locally. For this project where the basement footprint will be relatively small and localized compared to the overall podium footprint, iis likely that sheet piles or tangent ACIP pile walls will be used for excavation support. If sheet piles are selected consideration should be given to the potential vibration impacts on adjacent structures, especially the Metro Mover facilties, and also the potential sheet installation difficulty due to isolated hard zones in the upper limestone as indicated by high SPT N-values such as at borings B-7, B-17, B-24, B-29, B-34, and B-38 among other locations. ‘Temporary support for basement excavations is typically performed as design- build. The projact design and construction team will have to consider the benefits of ‘each of these systems with respect to cost and schedule. Regardless of the option selected NV5 should review on the Owner's behalf, the geotechnical aspects of such designs, 6.3.2 Basement Dewatering The basement bottom of slab and bottom of pile cap excavations could extend as low as elevations -1 to -4 feet NGVD. Average site groundwater elevations are ‘expected to be between +0 and +4 feet NGVD. Its therefore expected that dewatering will be required for construction of the proposed basement. Several options are available for dewatering and these can be used in conjunction with any of the NSMr Rob ators Cetover 13, 2014 Forbert Lc Page 13 Fepor of Geoictncal Stuy— Mam Werécenter Master Retail VS Project No. 146506 ‘excavation support methods above. Any of the above excavation support methods that also act as seepage cut-off will make the task of dewatering easier. The excavation could be kept dry by well-point dewatering. However over the long-term this Is costly and resulls in the need to dispose of very large volumes of water. Alternatively, after excavating to depth, an anchored tremie concrete seal slab ‘can be poured to resist the hydrostatic-uplit so that long-term dewatering is not required. Other methods for sealing the basement excavation include construction of a ‘soll mix or jet grout plug. However given the relatively small footprints of basement ‘construction compared to the overall podium footprint, itis anticipated these latter methods might not be cost-effective. 6.3.3. Stability of Basoment Excavation During construction the dewatered basement will be subjected to hydrostatic uplift forces. The basement construction method selected must ensure that those hydrostatic uplift forces can be resisted with an adequate factor of safety. Smaller diameter piles ‘can be installed as anchors as required. 6.4 IMPACTS TO ADJACENT METRO MOVER FACILITIES “The foundation details for the elevated Metro Mover guide ralis and station structures are not known at this time. Notwithstanding, we do not foresee that the podium foundations will have any significant settlement impacts on the Metro Mover foundations. Localized excavations if they are deep and require installation of shoring could impact the Metro Mover facities by way of either vibrations or loss or reduction of soil support around the Metro Mover foundations depending on the methods of ‘excavation support chosen. The foundations for the heavier towers 1, 3, and 4 along the eastem project perimeter have a greater potential for settlement impact to the Metro ‘Mover foundations, and this discussion Is developed in more detail in the respective tower reports. Nonetheless, a more detailed study of any potential Metro Mover Impacts whether from the podium or tower foundations, cannot be conducted until the plans for the Metro Mover foundations become available. We understand the Owner is in the process of obtaining such plans. NV5 should be provided with such plans for review so that so that the issue can be more fully addressed and appropriate mitgation measures developed as needed. 6.5 MISCELLANEOUS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Environmental forces consist of sinkholes, freeze thaw damage, shrinking and swelling soils, and hurricane scour can affect the performance of a foundation system. Sinkholes, freeze-thaw, and shrinking/sweling soils are generally not of concem in the South Florida area, While a detailed study of hurricane scour was outside the scope of this study, it is nonetheless our opinion that the foundation systems recommended herein when properly designed and constructed, will resist hurricane scour forces. It is, NVIit Rab Poors Cetoter 13, 2014 Fore Nm LC Pogo 18 Repo of Gaotocnc! Stuy Mm Woddconter aster Retail VS Project No- 146566 therefore our opinion that these specific environmental forces have a low risk (on a scale of low, moderate, high) of adversely affecting deep foundation performance at this site provided the foundation system is designed and constructed as recommended herein 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS. ‘Our recommendations for geotechnical design and construction of the proposed project are provided below in the following sections. 7.1 SITE PREPARATION AND GRADING. 4. Geotechnical site preparation for construction should consist of removal of all existing structures, foundations, pavements, underground tities, and other deleterious materials within proposed structure and pavement footprints plus a five-foot perimeter. Any voids created by the removal of these deleterious ‘materials should be properly backfilled as described in the paragraphs below. No information has been provided about previous or existing foundations at the site and we are not aware of the site development history beyond the currently ‘existing structures, Where old spread or other foundations are encountered, they should be removed and replaced with compacted fill if they interfere with new foundations or utlties. If the old foundations do not interfere with new ‘construction they could be left in place. Backfiling of old foundation excavations should be performed in accordance with the recommendations provided in this report ‘After site preparation as described above, areas for structures that will have slabs on grade or pavements should be proof rolled and densified with at least 10 ‘overlapping passes of a 20-ton roller as it operates at its maximum vibrational frequency and a travel speed of not more than 2 feet per second, The proof rolling should be observed by NVS to identify and mitigate any weak subgrade ‘conditions evidenced by yielding or rutting at the wheels of the roller or truck. Proofoling should include planned development footprints plus a five-foot perimeter. 2, Ingeneral fil sols should consist of either inorganic, non-plastic sand having less than 10 percent material passing the No. 200 sieve, or crushed limestone with a maximum rock size of six (8) inches. In particular, fill soils placed within the lupper 12 inches of the subgrade of building slabs on grade should consist of ‘either sand with less than 10 percent passing the number 200 sieve, or crushed limestone with a maximum particle size of three inches. NSwr Rob Poors Cetober 2, 2004 Forbes Neamt LLC. Bago 18 ‘Report of Geotectaical Study Miami Wolcentor Mastr Rata MV Project No. 146566 Based on our boring data the near-surface sandy materials should satisfy the fill criteria, but might require localized sorting and moisture-concitioning prior to re- Use. In any event, representative samples ofthe fil soils should be collected for classification and compaction testing, The maximum dry density, optimum moisture content, gradation, and plasticity should be determined. These tests are needed for quality control of the compacted fil 3, Fill soils should be placed with loose lft thicknesses of not more than 12.inches, ‘moisture-conditioned to within two (2) percent of the optimum moisture content based on ASTM D-1557, and compacted to a minimum 95 percent relative compaction’. One tast should be performed for each 2,500 square feet of fill area per lit of fl sols. If during the compaction process fill shows evidence of yielding under the weight of the roller, it should be removed and replaced with properly compacted granular fil as described herein. Fill particles exceeding one (A) inch in size should not be allowed to nest within the fil 4, The vibrations produced by the operation of the compactor should be monitored ofential adverse effect on adjacent existing structures,_pavemer ullities. I nearby structures will be affected by the vibration of the compactor, ‘the compaction procedure may require modification as approved by the geotechnical engineer. 7.2 FOUNDATION SUPPORT 7.24 ACIP Pile Foundations 1. Our recommended pile tip elevations, allowable pile axial capacities, and grout strengths for foundation support are presented in the table below. TABLE 3 - SUMMARY OF PILE ALLOWABLE AXIAL CAPACITIES _ Minimum Pile | min. Pile Tip | Allowable | Allowable | Grout Diameter | Elevation’ | Compression | Tension | Strength (in) (enevo) | (tons) (tons) (ksi) 24 Se 205 65 oe "E Minium il ip steven Based onan average ae grade of #0019 fect GUD to ine o boing 2 Ragu gout sbongth's fora 28day st 3. The High Veoaty Hurcare Zore sectors 1822 trough 1828 ofthe 2010 Feria Bulking Cod do rot “pscicaly acres tho scanty sess in ihe pe sacten fv ACIP los. Weave aesured that 0.3 ‘Hewes i Socton 1810 of th Code epoca for ACIP pos ais. The shout bo confrmed wh he {bea ag Oa elaive cmp afar the lacey int weigh ofa mater ensued a a percentage fhe maximum Cunt weal ofthe atne maar eden nthe bursty ving the Modeg Precio proce (ASTH Woir Rob Patore (otaber 13,2014 Foibes Nant LLC. Pago 16 ‘Report of Geotectnicel tidy Miami Worcentar Master Reta NV Projo No. 146866 2. For computer structural modeling of the structure, an intial vertical spring constant of 820 kips per inch (kp) may be used for the 24-inch-diameter piles. The vertical spring constant is the working pile load divided by the estimated pile settlement and is based on our experience and a review of available pile load test data in similar subsurface conditions, The inital spring constant value should be refined as the structural model is developed. The design value used should match the settlement estimates, 3, Resistance to lateral loads can be provided by passive pressure acting on the pile caps and grade beams, friction between the subgrade and bases of Toundation elements, and the’lateral resistance of the piles. Equivalent fluid densities of 180 and 80 pounds per cubic foot may be used to compute the passive pressures acting against the sides of the pile caps and grade beams above and below the groundwater table respectively. Passive resistance of the upper one foot of soil should be neglected, unless it is confined by a slab or pavement. Frictional resistance between the soil and bottom of foundation ‘elements should be computed by multiplying the sustained dead loads by a Coefficient of 0.3. The above values include a factor of safety of at least 1.5, To evaluate the lateral capacity of the piles, we have performed lateral load analyses using the LPILE computer program to estimate the performance of the piles under lateral loading. Both fixed and free pile head conditions were assumed in order to establish the upper and lower bounds for lateral capacity of the piles. In reality, the degree of fixity at the pile head will fall somewhere between the two extremes. The structural engineer should assess the anticipated pile head condition and choose allowable lateral load capacities accordingly. Our recommendations for allowable pile lateral capacity for the two pile head conditions are presented in Table 4. The recommended capacities are provided for horizontal movements on the order of % to 3/8 inch as well as for movements of % inch. While both values are recommended, we recommend that the design for lateral load is based on the smaller deflection limit. If required, we ‘can provide higher lateral capacities associated with batter piles. The pile lateral resistance can be assumed to act atthe base ofthe pile cap. _TABLE 4 - SUMMARY OF PILE ALLOWABLE LATERAL CAPACITIES _ Maximum | Depth to Max. | Depth to PiteDiameter | Allowable | Bending Moment | Bending Zero (in) Lateral Load | (inkips) Moment | Moment {hips} m | — Free Head “ 2a (16 3B) cy 3150, 08 Za(upio%) | 60 4935. 10 18 — Fie Head 2a (Te 3) md 0 76 24 (upto) 65i5 ° 18 NWSMr Rob Peters etoter 13,2014 Forse Mam LC Page 17 Fon of Groton Study Mami Wolconter Master Retal VB Projet No. 145866, Notes: 7. Later oad capaci based on ple head movement shown poreneses above 2. Bending moment std abo ar nfacored. 4 reinforcing should be designed by the structural engineer to resist the tension and lateral forces applied to the pile systems. We recommend that piles resisting tension be reinforced over their entire length. The. information presented above for depths to maximum and zero moments should be used to design reinforcement lengths for piles resisting lateral loads. Ifthe pile is not reinforced over the entire lenath. we recommend as a minimum, a sinale No. 7 bar be installed the full length of the ple to verify pile cross-section continuity. 5. Foundations should be designed so that a minimum center to center pile spacing Of three pile diameters is maintained. 6 We recommended that a load test program be performed for the project prior to the start of production piling. This will allow for the test results to be analyzed, and for pile recommendations to be revised if necessary. Based on load test results pile capacities andlor lengths may be adjusted. The pile load test program. should consist of one (1) compression load test (ASTM D 1143), one (1) tension load test (ASTM D 3689) and one (1) lateral load test (ASTM D 3966) for each pile diameter and pile tip chosen. Load tests should be performed and results Interpreted in accordance with the most current edition of the Florida Building Code. We recommend the use of strain gauge pairs in all test ples to evaluate pile load transfer. Upon final selection of the load test location, NVS will provide recommendations for the locations (wrt to elevation) ofthe pile instrumentation. The minimum test loads should be twice the pile working capacity. We recommend the compression load tesi(s) be designed to allow overloading of the test pile(s) to 2:5 times the design working load after completion of the standard ‘compression test loading and unloading procedure. 7. Test piles shall not be used as production piles. Upon approval by the geotechnical engineer, reaction piles may be installed in production locations. provided such piles are properly installed to meet the project specifications and ‘are monitored for movement during load testing. 8, _NV5 should review and approve the contractor's load testing submittal with respect to test locations, lest pile installation, and load testing equipment and procedures. The geotechnical engineer should also monitor and report the results of test pile installation and load testing, 9. We note that the borings encountered zones of very hard rock at the site. These are indicated on the generalized subsurface profiles shown on Drawing 2 as ‘material with refusal type SPT N-values typically exceeding 60 bpf. Some of these materials are encountered at elevations above the recommended pile tip elevations. The contractor must mobilize the appropriate equipment in order to NWSwr Rob Peters ‘oxtoter 13,2014 Foie itgmt Lc Page 18 ‘Report of Gectactcel Stady~ Miami Werkcener Mastor Relat vB Preect No: 146606 ‘achive the tip elevations recommended herein. 10, Piles should be installed within three inches of specified plan location, and within ‘wo percent of vertical or batter line. 11. During grouting of the pile excavation, the auger should be raised at a rate ‘consistent with the capacity of the pump to ensure the entire pile shaft is Uniformly grouted and to prevent caving of soils into the pile excavation, The ‘actual grout volume for each ACIP pile should be at least 1 percent greater than the theoretical pile volume. A grout head of at least five feet should be maintained throughout the grouting of the pile shaft. Production piles should be installed in a manner similar to the successfully tested pile. 12. If during pile grouting any abnormalities such as sudden pressure drop or low {grout take for a given interval of pile length are observed, the auger should be re- advanced to about five feet below the elevation where the anomaly was ‘observed and the pile shaft properly re-grouted. Pumping should continue while the auger is rotated back down to the required remedial depth, 18. New piles should not be installed close to previously installed piles before the existing pile grout has started to set, As a guideline, the closest distance for installing adjacent piles within six hours should be the greater of eight feet or three pile diameters. 44, Grout should be sampled during piling installation at a minimum frequency corresponding to the greater of one set of at least six cubes each morning and afternoon during production or one set of at least seven cubes for each 50 cubic yards of grout placed. Cubes should be tested for compressive strength at the following intervals: one at 7, one at 14, and two at 28 days. Any remaining cubes ‘should be retained for subsequent intermediate or 56-day breaks if required, 415. The steal reinforcement should be installed into the pile shaft immediately upon. withdrawal of the grouting auger. Spacers should be fitted to the reinforcing ‘cages to assure that they remain centered within the grouted shaft and maintain the required side cover. If obstructions are encountered during insertion of the steel cage, the cage should be extracted, the pile shaft re-driled to at least five feet below the elevation of the obstruction and re-grouted to the around surface, and the reinforcement re-installed. 16. We recommend that an NV5 inspector provides full-time quality control inspection to document the excavation and grouting of each pile and to provide, in conjunction with a licensed office engineer, any necessary field adjustments of pile tip elevations. If Ownership retains ‘another geotechnical engineer to ‘observe foundation installation, that engineer wil be required to accept full responsibilty for the foundation performance.Me Rab tos ctobor 13, 2014 Foros Mam Lc Page 19 FRopon of Geotoaaca Study — Mami Wocenter Maser Reta VB Prec No 146866, 47. The foundations for the podium should be extensively monitored during onstruction to confirm settlement predictions and document building performance. The monitoring should consist of a number of benchmarks placed at accessible fist floor column and shear wall locations. NVS5 should approve the locations of the benchmarks. The settlement benchmarks should be referenced toa stable offsite benchmark that will not be subject to tampering or be affected by the podium settlement The benchmarks should be surveyed by a professional surveyor on a regular basis, and the data provided to NVB tor review. 18. In addition to benchmark surveys of foundation settlement performance, we recommend also that three production piles selected by NVS be instumented with up to five pairs of strain gages. NV5 should provide specific elevations for the gages, inspect the gage installation, provide construction-phase monitoring of the gages, and evaluate the gauge readings. 49. Construction of any structural links between the 10-level podium and the towers, should be delayed until the towers are substantially complete and the majority of building settlement has occurred. If this is not practical we recommend the ‘spans connecting the closest portions of the tower and the podium be designed to accommodate differential movements up to ¥ to one (1) inch 7.2.2. Shallow Foundations (Block C Podium) 1, As discussed above, the podium within Block C can be supported on shallow foundations. Shallow foundations bearing on the near-surface limestone can be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 8,000 psf, provided the site has. been prepared as described above, The bottoms of footings should be ‘embedded at least 36 but no more than 60 inches below the existing grade, ‘The footing depth must ensure that footings. ing_on_sound, clean ime No, 87 stone to allow use of ing_value recommended above,_A\ ve_if the top of sound rock is than the proposed bottom of footi nthe in-situ materials should be wn 10 ‘lean, sound rock, and led with_N ‘Such over-excavation should include a two-foot perimeter ‘around the proposed footing, 2, To assure an adequate factor-of-safety against a general shearing failure, strip and continuous footings should be at least 18 inches wide, and isolated footings. should be no less than 30 inches wide. 3, The parameters presented in Section 7.2.1 above may be used to compute the lateral resistance of the shallow foundations,ir Rob tore etober 13, 2014 Forbes Mami LLC Page 20 Repo of Gaotoctical Stuy Miami Wedéconter Master Reta vB Praet No 146556 4, It is noteworthy that the elevation of the top of limestone at the site may vary. The exposed limestor the bottom of footi n_ should be und, competent lacement of No, e backlil, or reinforcement and pouring of the footing 7.23 Miscellaneous Structures 1. Lightly loaded miscellaneous structures such as guard huts, planters and small retaining walls be designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 2,000 pst. ‘The parameters presented above for lateral load resistance may be used in the design of these shallow footings. Footings must bear at a minimum depth of 12 inches below lowest adjacent grade. Continuous footings should be at least 16 inches wide and isolated footings should be at least 24 inches wide. Exposed bearing solls should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative ‘compaction. 2. With the shallow footing beating pressure recommended above, we expect settlement of such footings for lightly loaded structures will be on the order of one: (1) inch, with differential settlement on the order of one-half inch. 7.8 GROUND FLOOR SLABS 1. Ground floor slabs may be supported on grade assuming the site is prepared as recommended under Section 7.1 Site Preparation and Grading above. 2. For slab design we recommend a modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 pounds per eubic ncn (pc) 3. Slabs should be reinforced for the loads that they will sustain and construction joints should be provided at frequent intervals 4, Slabs in contact with soll are subject to movement of moisture from the soil Upward through the slab. To prevent such moisture vapor transmission, a ‘mo'sture barrier should be placed on the slab subgrade, and should be protected from damage during construction. Construction joints should be provided with water stops in any permanently submerged areas, 5. Construction of the ground floor slab should also take into account the anticipated settlement performance of the structure. Delayed floor slab placement can be considered to reduce settlement-related cracking and/or slabs should be left roughed for placement of a topping slab once the structures are complete and settlements have mostly stopped. NWIMe Rob tors cteter 13, 2014 Forbes Mem LC. age 21 Report of Gaotctrical Shy Mian Woracentor ster Reta NV PraeetNo 146556 7.4 BASEMENT AND RETAINING WALLS 4, Inaddition to the basement walls, retaining walls could be constructed for loading docks or other landscape/hardscape features. Walls that will be restrained at the top should be designed to resist a-rest earth pressures. We recommend that the earth pressures be determined using a triangular distribution and an equivalent fluid density of 50 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). Walls that are free to rotate at the top such a8 site retaining walls should be designed for active earth pressures using a triangular pressure distribution with an equivalent fluid weight of 36 pf For walls that are submerged the corresponding equivalent fluid densities of 90 ‘and 80 pef should be used should be used for at-rest and active earth pressures respectively. A lateral coefficient of 0.4 and a rectangular pressure distribution ‘should be used to compute the effect of surface surcharges on the walls. 2. Walls in permanently submerged areas should be properly waterproofed 7.8 PAVEMENT THICKNESS DESIGN This section presents recommendations for design of pavements for the project. Flexible pavements would be used for passenger and other light vehicles. Rigid pavements would be required for loading docks and other areas subjected to truck traffic. Pavements should be designed and constructed in accordance with the current ‘editions of the appropriate Florida Department of Transportation's pavement design manuals, 7.54. Flexible Pavements 4. Flexible asphalt pavements should be used for light-duty traffic areas. Flexible pavement subgrades should be prepared as described under Section 7.1, Site Preparation and Grading. We recommend the following minimum flexible asphait pavement section ‘+ Zinches of S-1 or $-3 surface course ‘+ B inches of lmerock base course compacted to at least 98 percent relative ‘compaction, The limerack base should have a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 100 percent. The base course can also be an ‘asphaltic concrete material (FDO specined AWU-S or equivalent with. a minimum Marshall Stabilty of 1,000 Ibs) ‘© 12 inches of stabilized subgrade compacted to at least 95 percent relative ‘compaction, The subgrade should have a minimum with a minimum LBR ‘of 40 percent as specified by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requirements for Type B or Type C Stabilized Subgrade. 2. We recommend that the bottom of the stabilized subgrade be at least 18-inches above the seasonal high groundwater table.Wr: Rob Poors Cciober 13, 2014 Forbes Neamt LLC Page 22 FRopot of Geotoctnica Susy Mam Wolcenter Master Rett vB Propet No. 146556 7.82 Rigid Pavements 4. We recommend using rigid (concrete) pavements in heavy-duty trafic areas such a for loading docks and the dumpster pads. The rigid pavement subgrades should be prepared as described under Section 7.1, Site Preparation and Grading. We recommend the following minimum rigid pavement section: 8 inches of unreinforced Portland Cement concrete (Type 1) with a ‘minimum 28-day compressive strength of 4,000 pounds per square inch. #8 inches of limerock base course compacted to at least 98 percent relative compaction. The limerock base should have a minimum Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) of 100 percent. ‘12 inches of stabilized subgrade compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction. The subgrade should have a minimum with a minimum LBR fof 40 percent as specified by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) requirements for Type B or Type C Stablized Subgrade, 2, The pavement should be provided with appropriately spaced jointing for crack control 3, We recommend that the bottom of the stabilized subgrade be at least 18.inches above the seasonal high groundwater table. 7.6 SPECTRAL RESPONSE ACCELERATION 1. For seismic design at the project site short period (S,) and 1-second (S:) spectral acceleration values of 0.0759 and 0.040 may be used, where g is the acceleration due to gravity. 7.7 EXCAVATION AND DEWATERING 4. Shallow excavations into the near-surface materials will likely stand vertical for short periods of time only. The excavation sides will unravel over time as they ‘are exposed to weather and construction traffic. In general, the Layer I limestone is expected to stand vertically unsupported if excavated. However localized weaker sandy zones within this layer could become loose. if lunsupported. Deeper excavations, especially those that extend below the groundwater table, as well as excavations that will remain open for longer periods of time will require support in the form of temporary shoring or sliding ‘rench boxes to prevent instabilty of excavation walls and to protect workers from injury. All excavations should comply with Occupational Safety and Health ‘Administration (OSHA) design and safety requirements, Shoring designs should be signed and sealed by a Florida-licensed professional engineer, and should be provided for the Owner's review. NWSRob Poe ‘tober 13,2014 ‘ort Ma LLC Pog 23 poo Geataica Stuy Mam Wersconter Master Reta) VB PreectNo 146806 2. Particular attention should be paid to any deep excavi elevator shafts, and the potential impacts these could have on adjacent structures, i ft z reject property lines, 3. Average groundwater elevation is expected to be between about Elevation +0 ‘and +4 feet NGVD for this site. In general the majority of podium foundation cexcavations are not expected to encounter groundwater. The excavations for the basement tunnels could extend as deep as elevations -1 to -4 or so feet NGVD and are therefore expected to encounter some groundwater. Consequently some dewatering could be required for pile cap excavations. Dewatering could also be required for the installation of deeper utilities and appurtenances such as sewers, storm drains, catch basins, and manholes. We judge that localized dewatering can be accomplished using pumps and sumps. Dewatering of larger ‘excavations and larger volumes will require the installation of well points. All dewatering and consequent effluent discharge should meet the requirements of the local jurisdictional agencies including Miami-Dade County, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Florida Department of Transportation, and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as appropriate. During dewatering the adjacent properties must be monitored for adverse impacts from dewatering drawdown, ‘The dewatering subcontractor should submit @ proposed design for dewatering ‘operations to the owner for review and approval prior to commencing work. 7.8 OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS: 4. Construction activities could have adverse impacts on structures outside the proposed structure footprints. We recommend that pre- and post-construction Surveys of adjacent structures of concern be conducted to document conditions. 2. NV should participate in the design development phases of this project in order to modify the recommendations provided above as changes occur during the design development process. 3. _NV5 should patticipate in the evaluation of field problems as they arise and recommend solutions. We should also be involved with site work activities so we can address needed changes to the foundation recommendations if site Conditions different from those described herein are encountered, 4. NVB should observe and test the foundation installation to verify that our recommendations have been properly implemented and to satisfy the requirements of the Florida Building Code and municipal agencies. If Ownership retains another geotechnical engineer to observe foundation instalation, that NWSMe Rob Poors ‘utober 19, 2014 Fortes Non, LLC. age 34 ‘Roper f Geotechnical Sty ~ Aon Werkcenter Mactr Reta NV Project Ne. 146585 ‘engineer must accept responsibility for the performance of the foundations. 8.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Owner and other members of the design/construction team for the specific projects discussed in this report. This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted local ‘geotechnical engineering practices; no other warranty is expressed or implied. ‘The evaluation and recommendations submitted in this report are based in part upon the data collected from the field exploration. The nature or extent of variations throughout the subsurface profile may not become evident until the time of construction. If variations then appear evident, it may be necessary to evaluate our recommendations {as provided in this report. In the event changes are made in the nature, design or locations of the proposed project construction, the conclusions and recommendations ‘contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed ‘and conclusions modified or verified in writing by NVS. The scope of services did not include any environmental assessment or investigation for the presence or absence of wetlands, sinkholes, chemically hazardous CF toxic materials in the soi, surface water, groundwater or ait, on or below or around the site We shoul th ni inal foun« an foundation _design drawings, in_order_to ascertain _whether_our recommendations have been properly intemreted and Implemented. Hf NV5. is not afforded the opportunity to participate in construction related aspects of foundation instalation as recommended in this report, we can accept no responsibilty for the interpretation of our recommendations made in this report or for foundation performance, 9.0 CLOSURE We appreciate the opportunity to provide specialized engineering services on this project and look forward to an opportunity to participate in construction related aspects of the development. If you have questions about information contained in this report contact the writer at 305,901-1891 NWSDRAWINGS NWS“NET ou STREET ‘Appronmato Soe in Foot LEGEND: B4 G7" - Depth and peroximae eatin of sal ‘Seay aor F653 150°" ~ Denon proximate cto ae Cort oan NOTES BLOCK °C" |___ BLOCK "F" BLOCK “H" 1S eae mae + 5: bee eonng proven) Ehsan fohtactson sce | JORAWING TITLE: "Site Vicinity Map & Test Location Plan |PROJECT NAME: Miami Worldcenter Retail - Master | proseorcoenmon Ne ist ave-& NE ih Sveer, Mim Fora PROIESTROT == [UATE pon5q [OWOWO >Stenta synbols saw vit sitr Bows [sw wens siur can sur so BE] Leste rracients mn sao | Eee EE] swo Stondarel penetration OSES tee Not Refers th ppc Recodo! Test Boing ll fora comps descent shown above, eee Generalized Subsurface Profile - Block H T NAME: ‘Miami Worldcenter Retail - Master PROJECT ADDRES bare: ATTITS HO > NE 1 st Avenue & NE &th Street, Miami, Florida 092914Steate symbols sea urtH sity B ovesioe ‘sano viTH SILT A] sw SILTY sano FE] uinesrone reacienrs ano sana [J se vim ster Ewa ‘Stendera penetrotion Dee Blow Feo sentra Net: Retr toto pene Record Test Boring logo compte design fh sata shown above. mean Generalized Subsurface Profle - Block H FIR SRD BY: NY) |S esr tne nae sev [PROJECT ADDRESS: Wye 1 st Avenue & NE &th Street, Miami, Florida ATE oorzari4 — PRAWINGNO! 5g [APDBY BWNEY:GE] saw wim srl saw J soo wim stir Bmsive [J suv saw Eon LESTE FRIGIENTS MD SAND (10) sexo vir suet Bi Seat se Count” Seer Bl vs/6" Nt: ott te appended Recor of et Born lg fr acme dtr ote stata stow seve, quesioee Generalized Subsurface Profile - Block F \waisieal 1] l | V | 5 FROHETIRIE ay wos Pata Haste Be sy | PRCIECTIOORESS: — ye 7s Avenve & NE ath Steet, Mar ia PFORETIO 26566 PR cocoa PRANOWO 5 [APOBY —‘SAND ITH SILT BQ swo um sur sao GB swo wm sur BB vvesrne [sux sao Ej v0 LIMESTONE FRAGINTS MD SAND Ih Stepdard penetration pees blow calirtaye Net: Reeth spend Racor of Tes Sing al fr comps dscns shown above fini Generalized Subsurface Profile - Blook F PUNEY 998 [PROJECT WANE: (ORD BYE ‘Miami Worlacenter Retail - Master ew APD BY PROJECT ADDRESS: iyE 1 st Avenue & NE &th Street, Mian, Florida[Bl swo urs ster Bivesoe i sno Stepdard pene tpation BRS TBS Feletre NVI [DRAWING TLE: [PROJECT NANE: PROJECT ADDRESS: (seo vie sur ff] s1¥ sa GO seo vim ster Saas remap ee 2, BA] Lvesrme rescrents wo seo EG] sw Seaton ete: Rt oe pede Reid ot Bong fr con eorpon ft stat sewn te Generalized Subsurface Profile - look D Miami Worldcenter Retail - Master NE 1 st Avenue & NE &th Street, Miami, Flora *osgats — PRAMINGNO: og sane HEHe HSER FEAE E E E Steota syenols san vine sier [JJ] smo wins ster suury sano Hh cow wm sur Thorstintors fence FB cvestone sao DRAWING TITLE: PROJECT WANE: PROJECT ADORE: Lives Feaaients ax saxo EE san Sevres Note Reeth peed Reco Test Boring ef fors compl decipton fhe sta shown abo. Generalized Subsurface Profile - Block D ‘Miami Worldcenter Retail - Master NE 1 st Avenue & NE &th Street, Miami, Florida PROYECTO: 6506 i q Standard penetration DBNBS OS‘Seta sya (By eo wim sur BB ives (I) saw vir scr [sw Hsu swo Ei] seo mice eam = eee Generalized Subsurface Profile - Block C —————— eee NE 1 st Avenue & NE 8th Street, Miami, FloridaStrate sumbols, ‘ {soe van str Biovesoe (1 se ware ster z EE] wo [Mf suv sao LiestO resents op st Ej wo 0 carts aoe teers. .. Siamese ma Non Rf he appended Resed Ys Boing (fr aconpstedssipn oft aa show aor eeu Generalized Subsurface Profile - Biook C PWN EY 598 Lainie Miami Worldcenter Retail - Master ORD EY sew [PROJECT ADDRESS: "ye 1 st Avenue & NE Bth Sireet, Miami, Florida 'STNO 146565 cogyaais _ PRAWINGNO: >, [APDBYAPPENDIX A BORING LOG DATA NWy 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING | PRO.ECT/Nioni Vorlacenter, ME Ist Ave & HE Sth St, Moni, Florida wORING NO BH PROT Mo sMesce START 08/11/2014 FINISH 8/11/2014 MEATIER Samy HORING LOcATION NW Se67a4) € seeaqe RRILLER—, Gerciost TRILL: obite B57 TRILL COMTRACTER WS WS Horates ELEVATION CEST. 1+ 12 S2'CNGVDD GROMONATER 9.0 feet (depth DATE ChECKED —aavti/eoie BORING METHOD Rotary aL WIth wash, md 8 cosing FLUID LOSS: none SAND VITH SILT 7 ery soft, tan, with sone Sand wen | 5 Sort, tan, with sone sana wo | 2 Livestone sna wm | a of sear | as t saw wit stir |(*1?.6i-200 +7. LIMESTONE very soft, ton, withN \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING estes le tae ei ea se tee at Ean Testo cn Pelee . | nn cone E sas Pale ? eeeeteermet reer ; feet rere eons : lege on ewe | od\ V RECORD OF TEST BORING | PROJECT Miani Morlacanter, ME Lat Ave NE Oth St, Miami, Florida morc wo Boa | ra, ton, with sone | aes | 00 sand ns | tars, tan, with sone | ex | 100 | tira tan, with sone | sar: | 100 | uimesrone {sen ‘ 1» s foe ra] ss | 2 6 (= 1.64 = 6,090) ot a Medium hard tan, with Very ara, ton, vitn | sae | 100 : Very hard, tan, with fever] 100V5 RECORD CF TEST BORING ch Uorldconter, NE Tet Ave ENE Ath St, Miami, Floriae BRING OB ery sort, tan, with Livestane foots, tan, sity sone Sort, ton, aleh sone cand use| 27 Iveey sort, tan, with very sort, tan, with leone sons fos-oe| 9RECORD OF TEST BORING nti Sage (580 FARECD Nin Wertderter, HE tot Ave WHE INS Man, Florida RL metro tae ‘ran owverene Fie eMOnl “eaten Toned westi96 sun 6 mae PILED, owen ite meile s7 er comeere Meter EWMTION (ESE 12.980 GeawOUTER BO fart Cémpto MIE CHRD ontveni4 Senta CTD fotry or eth sean mat cang am ue ane : Lowe, ey vel ° E | swum wits sitt Loos, wow ves cee ey I o/s | sity sawn [iegtarestisgtents Jew | F Mere stg tom fe |e : : ry sot, tr, wien : | LavestIne ry aor, tan, tn 4 fo sat eas = ery sory, wn, wrth aE eee eT AEENV 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROECT:Miont Uortdcentor, NE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Miami, Florida, BORING NBS ~ ‘SAND wedi dense, tan - very soft, ton, with “7 q Herd, tan, with sone a a Moderately hard tan, r= lew = 7.2, qu = 1.140) 3s LIMESTONE “ 185 eyes a [oss fies ~ a WWery sort, tan, with wo | 13i \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORINGNV RECORD OF TEST BORING OCT Nin! Weracntr, ME tet hve #6 88H 38 Wan, Fleride AORN HO fraser no vase ‘run einen Mtoe 88/1/2014 METER Savy Done LOerOW WSs) © sel MILER nest rater Den ute 7 TRI carmAcronNS 8 EVAION CST + 123M AGADITEN ent Capt) DATE CEOED. oat 014 TORING HEED etry il nth wah, ma csi RUD LIES se 2 San eau aerse, oy | | ceossimle Fis » sur sao (eile ew | ery srt, tan with : iy Ss ofa rn we) sand woe | ee . ry sot, tan th at wns lsone sand wo | 19 = heey = 6 Lee C RRS SEES ASE Career Be age coo eee tts, on ced Eeptaren Stare foe ae\ V 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJCT-Mlant Worlacenter, HE Ist Ave AE 8th St, Mion, Flarise mG a6 “ : one sand Nae | a r* Limestone - ey sort, tan, with ~ q ery sore, tan with ~ lard, tn, atm sone fener) 9 ond “* : ery ar tn, wisn [sear | 0 aa ery sort, tn, wien Jone sa we | 10V 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECTINIem! Vortdcenter, AE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Miami, Floriaa BORING NO BT PRO.ECT MO 1AaS66 ‘START: 08/05/2014 FINISH 09/05/2014 WEATHER: Sunny RING LocaTiOW —N SeécESL, € 922305, IRILLER—Yunteski Morales DRILL: Mouse 2-57 DRILL CONTRACTOR WS WS ELEVATION CEST.>+ © 12,84° TATE CIECKED © oavo/e044 BORING METHOD: Rotary ariLL with wash, mud & casing FLUID LOSS None [LIMESTONE FRAGHENTS|cue1.2)-200-2 9 AND SAND (PROBABLE FILL ery soft, tan, with very soft, tan, with leone Sor ew | ae Wery soft, tan, with nesta wr | a * ' Very soft, tan, with ‘SAND = 7 loose, tan ‘Ris aco of ese Bating Te port oF Se pele etc eae nt sats Bloat e,NY d RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT:Miani Wor icenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Mlanl, Floris maine SaND " soe | * Medium dense, gray * Nery sates ray. with “ LIMESTONE, Ee ery sort, greys with [sone son! we | is Pa sore, gray, 41th sone a sors, roy, with sone fen seve | 20 - ery sorts graye itn lee cae eal 7RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECT/LOCATION — Mian! Mord Center, NE Ist Ave 8 NE @th St, Miant, FloriBORING NO B-8 soe aon worl o 2 LanesTone “+ very sre, orev, th -” ery sorts gray, with leone sar Jom | 2 ~ Nery sorts orev, wren ~ bars oy, wien sone | ar | 9 “4 ery soft, grey, withVo RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECT Want Yortacenter, NE Ist Ave ME Bth St, Mion, Florio wore ne 8 ca bare, eran wrt sone | | 10 ws LesTone “Tt | Nerd, gray, with cone | sie | 100 w= 20) aw = 000 ra se jer vfs | = ery sort, grey with oa E son sand ae| rs sen fora) 2a - : sore, any wien sone ~ EB sors, tan, wien soneN \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING roca arr hi ae ek 2 Ree eta weno a ciesTONe o- owe, ey cals = ‘SAND “ ery sot, tans tie "8 ery mr. ey win fr] on Limestone = 7 ete ve | ery soft ey eth ive ts Lm] 10V RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECT Mion! Mar\dcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE th St, Miant, Florida morn no 9 PROECT 146366 START! 08/02/2014 FINISH 0/04/2014 MEATIER Sumy BRING LOCATION —_-N 526959) € $22459 BRIER, Garcia TRILL: Hobie B57 [ILL CONTRACTOR: WS Rivers. LEVATION CEST.D+© 10.77°CNGVED GROUNBVATER: 9 feet Caepth> DATE. CHECKED 08042016 BORING METHOD Rotery drill with wash, ud & casing FLUID LOSS None " E Jerste7i-aooeem> = fee | is f. |LIMESTONE FRAGHENTS edion dense, ton r SAND ee fas I) CPROBABLE FILL |pediem dense, ton . I: Very sort, tan, with 3 [sore sora ee fas ery sort, tan with i LIMESTONE vor] ; edn dense, ray os ‘SAND 7 Lease, oray SESS al2aa'Sf eae Slag Te'prt of the'projeck Getechnical gers” epoca ty iegratien CD = ied Tonia Sear Sp\ V 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING (tani Noracentr, NE Ist Ave ME Bt St, Won, Flot BRIN WO 9 sie fares 20-20 |e] 7 Hes rar san wth LIMESTONE — very sort, tan, with al ery sort, tan with see san woe |N RECORD OF TEST BORING Pe oe eet et ee el somone 99 p] enesrme yeep ow vim fd a a neste fy nana ans cr fare) | a sty oe vim ||Vo RECORD OF TEST BORING ROLE Vorlacenter, NE Ist ve & NE 8th St, Mian, Florida BoRING No B-9 Very soft, tan, ith ‘one sora ene | 17 q sore, ton, sith sone lend fav-ise| ex LIMESTONE : Medion hard tan, with i ‘fone sana jor-ise| 22 7 sort, tan, with zone 4 je-sw| 22\ \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECTNIon orlacenter, NE Ist Ave AE Oth St, Mion! “torte DOING Mo B+9 : ery sore, ton with Limestone [sont Sond for] 10 : ery sors, ten, with f sons Sand foro} se | ers, tan, vite sone | awy> | 100 een : ery sors, tan, itn E son Sard jor-im] 16 F eens sand tae] aRECORD OF TEST BORING PRILECT Mion! Worlacenter, ME Ist Ave & NE 68h St, Mani, Florida mornG NO BHD PROECT Nh eS68 START) 09/02/2014 FINISH 03/02/2014 WEATHER Sunny BORING LOCATION. WN 526903, € 922067 TRIMER Yuniesi Morales TRILL: Hobie 8-57 TRILL CONTRACTOR WS WS ELEVATION CEST. 9+ 12, 22"CNGVED. GROUNDWATER: DATE cHEDXED 9/8/0034 BORING METHOD: Rotary driL vith wash, mud & casing FLUID LOSS None * Iain derse, ton |] SAND * PROBABLE FILL) L005, ton wes . SILTY SAND wel v Wery soft, gray. with 2 lsone rand ve | 0 ery soft, gray. with leone sand ecw | as : uvestne | P™ wr | 0 ery soft, gray, with lame are wer] 9 wel o san ‘nisTettara of Feet ering Te pars therorojecl Geotecicelfegw't” AU = fack unl ty fstamtien (3RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECTMIon! Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Mion, Florie moRINS wD B10 loose, tan, with san Kinestone trogrents— |av-ar | 16 | F sors, gray, with sone i sone wear | 23 2 Hara rey. with sone be © | 100 | lard, rey. ath sone PF] urmestone foam ww | 100 E Nery sort, brown, with E Se wan | o le Son ae |RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Mian Yortdeenter, NE Ist Ave & NE 8th St, Mion, Florida mornig net PROKCT ND 146566 ‘Sa o9/a2vanid FINISH 09/02/2014 EATIER: Sunny TERING LOCATION S690) E $22174 TRILLER—Yunieski Morales FRILL Hobite B57 DRILL CONTRACTOR WHS NYS ELEVATION CEST.)+-+ 12,02" ¢NGVID.— GROUNDWATER: DATE cxccKeD: —on/na/2014 [BORING METHOD Rotary ost with nach, mut & casing FLUID LOSS! Hone 7 Sain em dense, tom | | DATE CHECKED 7/16/2014 HIRING METHOD: Rotary aril with wash, ud & casing FLUID LOSS None . |E[CTRESTONE-TRAGRERTA medi dense, teow f & SAND oe [as w fz} CPROBABLE FILL) _Ivediun hard, tan, with i: sort, tan, mith cone 2 iE sn we | Wery sort, tan, with ~ i: lsone car 2 very soft tan, wien LIMESTONE : ery soft, tan, with f leone car wer| 9 : Nery soft, tan, with H ‘sone sora aa! 10 : IMesiun donee, ton 5 F ‘SAND ‘nts nace of Tore Baring te fort of Sa praject Sectechricl toport” l= feck Bue ty besten CO 1 wart aie at ange ine ale are mr clon evi oats rer A > ened EoeeaeeSeere 2\ \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECTiani Worldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Bth St, Wlanl, Florida mRNG Be = san com dense, ton F o-w | 16 4 Nery sort tans with i ssn Sa pee] 6 bn Limestone Ef larg, ton, with sone Ee sora ww | or : ery sort, grey, wth sone cond wow | 6 — 1¢ 12.47°CNGVD) GROUNDWATER 10 Feet CNGVID. TATE CHECKED: v/ev/e014 MORING YETIOD——-Rotory driLL th wesh, mat & casing FLutD Loss: None i & SAND. oe | a 7 fr} PROBABLE FILL) peau hard, ton. with iz one sora re] xe i Mediu hard, any th 7 i Sone sora ow | oo " Iain hard, tons with : i one sora ow | . Lane sTONE 7 ery soft, tan, with Nery s0r8, tan, with = sano Sires RMT ELEMENT Rn om ot al ean SegRECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECT Mion! Vorldeenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Oth St, Mani, Florida BORING NO BIS PROJECT ND 146566 START 06/05/2014 FINISH 08/05/2014 MEATHER: Sunny BORING LOCATION Se70ue) & 922165 DRILLER: Yuniese Morales ELEVATION CEST. + 12.06°CNGVD) — GROLNBUATER DATE GeECKED —oBvasve0n4 BORING YETIOD—Rotory iLL with wash, mad & cosing FLUID LOSS None 7 TaD Hein dense, wom | | E fer] 57RECORD OF TEST BORING PRCT nin ertdenter, ME iat Ave ACH, Man, Flriéh IN Por wo se Stunt 77201 aise O/8/2014 WEATHER Say foes Lncarion w serie 92477 teu y ewe TRILL. Mobile B57 DRILL CONTRACTOR NYS ws veri Aevrim este ACG! GRANBUTER 9 ek Spe NTE EDIE ereveo4 TORING VETGD foley art wth moh, mo easing PID La Nee || » cay ete Soo as few | 10 [amesroNe rRacnents pum sec, wewn me ge) im cao wo | os EM] conatete FOL) un soca tn ave vw | 20 e| a f SILTY SAND vw] 16 : ery soft tn nth 7 ery sore on won E a we} Linesroe iE ono send sem | 19 dun ean, eee sao Saat heathy nro a meg nan Poe en eoV J RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECTIMiami Worldcenter, NE Ist Ave 4 NE Ath St, Miani, Fleride BRING NO Be saND Lose, orange bara tan itn sone Le ol sep lard, ton, vith some fe-re} 00 « cavesTONe, Hors, orange, with Iesiun dense, orange = ‘SAND Nery sort, crange, Limestone |aith sone cara seao | 17RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT-Miani Worldcenter, ME Ist Ave & HE 8th St, Mani, Florida ORIG MBI PROLECT NO) 146866 START. 07/24/2014 IRISH 07/24/2014 VEATHER Sunny BORING LOCATION NW S27171 € 922097 TRILER 1. Carson RRILL: O€-75, DRILL CONTRACTOR NS AWS Norotes ELEVATION CEST.D1# 12,22" CNGVID— GROTUATER: Tare cHeceeD §——a7veave0r4 BORING METHOD Rotary eit with mash, nud & casing FLUID LOSS Hone Sone son oe |e ‘SAND (POSSIBLE * FIL Lease, brome wel + SILTY SAND wee lean eww | ae Very soft tan with . Linesrme Pee we] very sort, tan with lsove sand wee | 16 | Medi dense, tan woo | a7 ~ SAND ‘nis wrcara of fest Bring Te'prt of he grajec sestichncel perk” sa etl Eogiie SereNV PRIUECTINiani Wor ldcenter, ME ist Ave & NE Oth St, Meni, Florida RECORD OF TEST BORING BORING MO BIB pee | 1s = ‘saND Soft, tan wth sone rons we | as sand ° LIMesTONE very nara, tan with |e | s00 eon dense, ray aw | as lnesiun dense, grey wee | 13 ‘SAND " ewe | ie Iesiun dense, tonNV RECORD OF TEST BORING Mer tacenter, NE Let Ave NE 6th St, Mani, Planias RDG wo Be ‘SANDNIV RECORD CF TEST BORING PROJECT Mlan! Vortdconter, ME et Ave & NE 6th St, Miami, Floris orn so B20 PROLECT NO 146566 START) 07/24/2014 FINISH 07/24/2014 YEATAER: Sunny BORING LOCATION ~N/527173, © S22i69 DRILLER 1, Garson” TRILL OME-75 DRILL CONTRACTOR WS NS Morales ELEVATION CEST. 3+ 12.08°CNOVID.—GROLROVATER ATE CHECKED: a7vewz014 ORIN METHOD: Rotary aril with wath, mal & cOsing uur Loss: None mee] Sa mS | or son coment | one coro 7 = 4 Sand etm dense, ton || 7 F | cposstLe FILL fp] LIMESTONE sort, tan, ith sone Is SoPt, ton, a1th sone : i ‘san Sona oe | mo Ss —SicTy Samo dae, tn tt ie si-eoceno ee | 7 . ‘san i 7 ae | os ITs CA Tes BME ce ga ae ctgttion co fora Hecke cant CD ASH 2 erred Cowrenive Sug (oeRECORD CF TEST BORING PROLECT Miami Wor dcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Mion, Florida moRING No Bel PROXCT NO 146566 STARE 07/18/2014 FINS 07/19/2014 WEATHER Suey BORING LOCATION S27IS6, E 922281 TRILLER 4. Johnson Rey TRILL) Howse B59 DRILL CONTRACTOR WS NYS ELEVATION CEST.9:+ 11,37" NGVDD.— GROUNDUATER DATE GeecKED: —o7/s@/2014 SORING METHOD: Rotary aril with wash, nud casing FLUID LOSS) None +y dence, ton ole » ‘SAND CPOSSILBLE FILL) [Dense, ton ww | a Sort, tan, with sone * sna we | as . sort, ton, wish sone leant ee] a sore, tan, with sone lsont gona wr] 9 5 LinesTONE ery sort, tan, with Very soft, tan, with [sow sonal ere | 10 Dense, ton we | as ° ‘sanD SOTA MEATS SEAN ACR SESE oan Ei Ste Spas recor ung aan 288k practoace "amy nec Pitan NE Mae Soe eT cel eae| RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT:Nicni Vortacenter, ME Ist Ave LAE Sth St, Mani, Florida SORING NO 2 san lvery soft, tan, with lars, tan, mith sone fee's} 100 Limestone sora ie send seo | 1a\ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROUECTNIont rtdcenter, ME ist Ave ME Sth St, Hian, Florida oning wo wee PRaect NO 14668 Stat. 67/25/2014 FINISH 07/25/2014 WEATHER: Sumy ING Woeaviow 8 Sa7179, © 22207 BRILLER. 4 dabrsn/Rey WIL sobs te 8-0 TRILL CONTRACTORS ELEVATION CEST +11 20"CHD)GROANDWATER! 9.1 Foot Cdopth) DATE ieexED. —_o7ves/2014 HERING HEED Rotary drill with wash, md & casing FLUID LOSS) None ET oS SM, [eitiSt aioe fee | a2 " UIE] costae Fru «7 iz lei tard. ton itn | | gp 5 i oxen TL | og + " sare, tan, wtth soe q Sone ee | a pf LEMESTINE —foery sort, ton, witm ery srt, ton, aro Sone San jer | 10 sono Dense, tan joa | se iia toned et ante We Mee entaneeonn te AST nel Tree Seg (5 Si| RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Mion! Worlacenter, ME Ist Ave b ME th St, Want, Florida mone wo Be Po Lecce, tan ow |e ery sort, tan, with Sand wee | 7 Wedium hard, tan, with ery sore, tan, with a ee! 7 ” LIMESTONE Very hard, tan, with ooo | 100 ‘sano Dense, ton seco | osRECORD OF TEST BORING FLEET Nat eric, ME at doe AE Oh Sy ani, Frida RIN Les rect wo tases ‘tam o77e/ie IMLse O/e48014 EATER Sey pe wate BS? parlor hea BORING HED Rotary it eth sh, mt asa PUD LSS None Leste SFME pean ere tn A nets «| cexotiit? TILL) lean nee, tn eee tp ere | ee sets | 6 LIMESTIBE. |sone sand aray | 12 ates eee eee ee ae CD nenPROXECT Moni Wordcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE 8th St, Miani, Floride RECORD CF TEST BORING oRING ND B29 a] woe] ia LaMesToNe lsand 7” wor] ot leone sor 7 | ee | ag ery sort, gray, with leone ron weve | ieNV RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Mion! Wortdcenter, NE Tet Ave ENE Oth St, Mian, Florida, ae) \Sone sand mm] 6 LIMESTONE very soft, tan, with ery sort, tan, with wor] 9 {* SAND ara, ton, with sone bo-are| toa LIMESTONE ara ton, with sone pe-see| 100 ve 199 oe 3 ee 1 (w= 0.8) qu = 6.570: ° ad ees’ a here ws | | a @RECORD OF TEST BORING NV PROLECTIMIont Vortdeenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Sth St, Miami, Florida ORING NO Bea SoF% oraye with sone sore fine] 27 IMoseretety pars, tan ler sone sora jeer] 56 suas LIMESTONE, ery soft, gray. with leone sand coe] 12 sore, ray, wth sone ery sore, gray, with sort, ray, with sone lane favs] 26RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Mion! Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Oth St, lanl, Florida wring NO B26 PROECT 146566 START 07/17/2014 FINISH 07/17/2014 MEATIER Sunny BERING LOcATION Ww Se7208) € 922471 TRILLER Joe Jehnson/Rey DRILL) Hobie B59 ‘DRILL CONTRACTOR SWS ELEVATION CEST. 9+ 14,42"CNGVE) GROROUATER: 9.8 feet CaeptId DATE CHEDNED 07/17/2014 HIRING METHOD Rotary dest with wash, nud & casing FLUID LOSS 100 % at 52 feet 4 ca Dense, tan ala fs | cpossiale FILL is Weston hare ten, wite i sonore ee | x IMesiun hare ten, with * i Jaane sand we | a : ts Mederetety hard, tan fe leit cone sand ee | 0 I: IMesiun hare ten, with LIMESTON fen an i \Sont Sond wa | as " Mesiun hare ten, with a AND 7 ery dense, tan "ese oo ce etdRECORD OF TEST BORING NE Ist Ave NE Oth St, Miami, Florida moRING NO B24 AND wae | 28 i Very soft, tan, with i cone nd) als BR) uinestone sone’ w-we| m0 r Very soft, tan, with E cone | a es) q Very soft, tan, wth i one ond eal\ \ RECORD OF TEST BORING PRIJECT Niemi Vorlacenter, ME tat Ave 1 NE Sth St, Moni, Floride sORING NO Bes PROUECT 9146866 START) 07/21/2014 FINISH 07/21/2014 EATER Surey BORING LOCATION NW 527318; © 922047 TRILL 4 dotnonfey 4 DRILL) Mobi te B80 TRILL CONTRACTOR NYS WS ELEVATION (EST.2: 12, .7°CNGVDD GROUNIVATER: 10.0 Feet (MGVED DATE CHECKED o7/et/2014 HIRING HETIND Rotary ahi with wach, nud & cazing FLUID Unss: NO JCIMESTONE-FRAGHENTS pense, ton AND. SAND oa . | CPROBABLE FILL) Inoderatety arch tn, laren soe’ son ew | 4 end velo Woserstely hard, ton, rr'en rove con eae | LaNesTONE, sort, ton, with sone Sand was | 24 sand wer | a ediun dense, tan ‘SAND SRT aS Ee Ring Te pe St Ba gesfet Eastchv cSt opare sed = Sock ny Betoneton © “3, coed Engng Ss atin tsi eaeRECORD CF TEST BORING ad ee = Eee . sw we “ ra lel i bod tan, vith sone fades"! 100, - Herd tan, with sone. ssve| 100 ~ LIMESTONE, very — Yan, with et “ sam fase asNV. RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT:Nien! Worldcenter, ME It Ave & NE Oth S&, Mant, Flarias RING NO Bes Linestone Bene Sana mew | 16 san Medium dense, ton fen LIMESTONE Word, tan, with sone forre| 100 cand fever | 29 E erin tore’ nd ewe] 4NV 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING Pmaccrinen iti AE st he LAE 8S Ma, Flore RIN "| ey tng on ove |g | a0 ie oe 8s . LoesrOe f pres heel a +| erent ete oes y few-1s0'| 40 - ‘SAND fs CINESTONE Soft, ten, with sone | bee lee] os r ‘SAND 1 —V 5 RECORD CF TEST BORING « Limestone ft jeri] a0 - as 7 bor ra | @ | 10 an . 17 ° 2 very hard, tn, witn farser| 109 cove fantNWO RECORD OF TEST BORING PROLECTI Mien’ Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Oth St, Hian!, Florio mone No B25 tumestane [Sone sand i ors, tan, with soneRECORD CF TEST BORING PROJECT Mion! Vortacanter, ME ist Ave & NE Gth St, Miami, Florida HERING NO B26 BORING LOCATION Se7aaty E 922tKe IRILLER — Wnteskt Morales RIL) Mobile B57 DRILL CONTRACTOR MS NS ELEVATION CEST.9:+ 11.30°CHGVDD GROUNDWATER Feet CasptD DATE CHECKED 7/27/2016 oy sa Wediun dense, rey » [Eas Sl | cerapaBLe FILL aoa I Westin dense, ray TIPE] sturv sano eveis"sye0ctelSS | ae | ua 7 Wesiun donee, oy E Limestone Fracnents ee] | : if & SAND Wesion dense, ory | ceossraLe FILL oe] iu : ery soft eray with : very saftey with 4 Livestone very soft, gray ith E lzove sor woe] 9 [save sora ew | a9 3 ca ned eee Serge er sci isis feces Sete eae Sh Sea al peRECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Nien! Vorlacenter, NE iat Ave & NE 9th St, Mian, Florida soe NO B27 PROJECT NO 145566 START. 07/26/2014 FINISI 07/26/0044 MEKTIER® Sunny ELEVATION CEST, 1+ 12.46/CNGVDDGROUNDUATER: —@ Feet Caspt>. DATE OHEOED —_aT/e6/2016 BORING METHOD Ratory aril #14h wah, nud & cosing FLUID Loss None cad loose, tan ee | (PROBABLE FILL) lense, orey erat ernaosss >| ae | oy neon cence, ton SILTY SAND wes Inecion sense, tan ists oceans > fee | a9 sort, ton, with sone and eae | 27 Very soft, tan, LIeSTONE, INesiun dense, ton eee | 19 ‘SAND SEG TOT GE at AEL US Then eo ened rae ae Gao"i RECORD OF TEST BORING FROKCT Mian! Vorlicenter, ME Lat hve &.NE 6th St, Mion, Florida woes wo B27 ; san en al sone sand ae | ae - very hard, gray with lever) 100 Limestone [sone sora be co S80 x ® enRECORD OF TEST BORING FROECT NO 146566 Stat 07/26/2014 FINISH 07/26/2014 EATHER. Sunny FRING LOCATION N Se7aees € 922356 TRILLER! Yunieski Moraes ELEVATION CEST): 9.37°CMVD) GROMOVATER: 8 feet Caepth> “DATE CHECKED: 07/26/2014 ORING HETHGD Rotary aril with wish, mud & casing FLUID LOSS: Hone a - Ey raion nee, orey | | us AE | ceropasue Fitts va resin dense, oray A san ee |e . THRs} CPROBABLE FILL Iveaiun dense, gray . sty saw iene ve] Sore, tan, with sone sana 0 kd sore. tan, with sone 7 Very soft, tan, with -t, By cess PE wow | ae very sort, tay wish i Pont Sond wow | oun Mec donee, tan os aND ee | an Bite Frenreien NalRECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECTINiani Wertdcenter, NE ist Ave & NE 8th St, Miani, Florida BRING MO Be8 PROUECT NO 146566 START 07/26/2014 FINISH 07/26/2014 WEATHER! Surry BORING LOCATION —N 527430) € 922040 DRILLER! dk otnson/mey ELEVATION CEST, 1 12.7°(NGVED GROMBUATER 9.9 Feet Centr) DATE CHECKED 07/26/2014 BORING FETED Rotary ait with wash, mud & casing FLUID Loss) None ° ICTRESTUNE-FRAGRENTS pense, tan AND SAND we |e PROBABLE FILL> lyediun parc ton, with " ‘one sand ee | a Median rareh ten, with Woderately herd, tan sen sone’ sora ee | 6 . Weston nara, ton, with Sone sara a 6 Lanestone metal was | 2 * Wediun dense, tan sew | aa * san IWesiun dense, tan Kins 20) -e00' 20) [ewww | 20RECORD OF TEST BORING Nortscnter, HE Ist Ave 2 NE Bh St, Man, lor mm es = |Mediun dense, tan sawn ww] fary ton nin sme fear] 00 ~ 3 JSoFt, tan, with sone E Sent p= |e = Y Hard, tar, with sone fear"! 100 “ ” IMard, ton, with sone fee"! 100 - LIMESTONE lsone sod enw | 7 E nr lew | *t is |Hard, ton, with sone ey * lsand =Vo RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Niani Worldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE 9th St, Miant, Floriaa “o LIMESTONE ~ son “ Very softy tan, with ‘one sand reso | 13 = LIMESTONE ° san leans“ Jerse | 26 = LIMESTONE =a Irs, tan, with sone fe-ses} 100 = low = 4.71 aw = 2,110) wea fra, tre nin ome [02 | 99 ow far ce oderatety hard, tan, [sith sone cana coe! 49NV 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PRO.ECTIMIen! Worlacenter, ME Ist Ave BNE Sth St, Mani, Farida BRING NO BD re] LIMESTONE very nara ten, with fr-u| 00 sort, tan, witn sone is ery soft, tan, with pee E Hers tar wien sone | a | oo rs san E sme feo-ser] 9 Love Limestone [na i sine sand wesc] 19RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT:Miani Worldcenter, NE Ist Ave E NE Bth St, Miant, Florida torn no 9 Hera. tan with som | sts | 100 LIMESTONE “ Very hard. tan, with je | 100 = Very hard, tan, with fer-us| 100 cone snd a lvery safe, ton, with Jeon Sor huevo} 19 “ very hard, tan, with for-mm'| 100 laone sor 131 = jer we |e | 4 8 ma ‘SANDNV 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING an rider, NE tat ow NE mS Man Farin, man pes = A | saw ens, an f i lever] asRECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Mian! Worldconter, ME Ist Ave & NE 8th St, Mont, Florida sORING HO 8-90 PROECT NO 146866 START: 09/02/2014 FINISH 09/02/2014 VEATIER Sunny SORING LOCATION 527499) € 922167 DRILLER. Gorcia/s DRILL: Mobile 2-57 TRILL CONTRACTOR YS NWS Rivera ELEVATION CEST.2:© 11.67" CNGVD GROUNDWATER 7.0 Feet Coepthd BATE CHECAED —_osvoeveni4 BORING METHOD: Rotery aril with wash, mud cosing uur woss wane | TRESTORETENGFENTS]Leose, brow ND SAND ve |e PROBABLE FILL) very sort, tan, with leone cond” ve | 0 ery core, tan, with [sont sora’ wae | 18 LIvesTONE, Very soft, tan, wth ne sand was] 9 Loose, grey 10 san Loose, rey est rin Te are fe projeck Gesschico) perk” ebb RAK Holst Becomtion cx) eit stare the nh nae ner fiction Hat ator eer PORECORD OF TEST BORING FROJECT:Miant Wordcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE 8th St, amt, Flerioa morinG 10 3-20 r SAND at “ LIMESTONE | fir, tan with sine lees] 100 , Nery sort, ton, wit E Ione Sond ww | 8 E tone tant“ Pasa | a : Very sort tan, with E sive Soe ew | 9RECORD OF TEST BORING PRULECT Mion! Wortdcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Bth St, Mian, Florida moRONG wo 8-30, L FY) uanestone san ery toose, rey jew | 2 ery soft, ton, wisn [sone sor eos | von LIMESTONE E Jeon Soret joe | 9 1 sore, tan, with sone i: [sand be-uwo | 26RECORD CF TEST BORING FROKECTIMioni Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE th St, Mani, Floris BORING NO 8-30 tumestone [sone Son’ fro] 40 Medium hard, gray, laren Sone son fre-ise| 42 = sore, tan, with sone Medium dense, tan loose, gray ‘SAND loose, ton four) 6 Medion sense, tan fesse] 10NV RECORD OF TEST BORING FROUECTNIon Wortacentr, ME Ist Ave & ME Oth SE, Mont, skins MD B29 sa Ys ery sort, tan, with = LIMESTONE = i | n | o x0 a ” 66 “ 7 is | 100 " sort, tn, with sone 4 fests] 20 lena ie | 100RECORD OF TEST BORING Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave ENE 8th St, Wiant, Florida MORIN NO B-20 fe] uimestme (SSR fae oatRECORD OF TEST BORING router no ees Stat 08/19/2014 FINISH OW/I9/2014 EAHER—Stnny owING Lacan w'Ser4ta) 920079 MILER Coreartiiet DelLLs Hobie 59 TRILL covTeacran ms ws Elevariot cesT 1208' GEOMDUATER 3.3 feet Caepth) BATE CHEHED—_oa/tare01e HERING WEED Rotary ditt with wash, mad & casing PotD L088" None RT] SUR a coo a aT a ° sITMESTINE-FRRGENTS| cry dense, tan [a seup cPRmBAne oe |@ = {eri ty tare, tn, E rsa’ wel , A send cle i lectin bard, tan, with -= fea * ° LIMESTONE 7 ery sort, tan, with " ein rad, tan with Hi ene oe war | E wa] 10 = ‘SAND 7 teen dense, rey ‘RsE addon SF eae Bing Tenors af warprojeck toteccnfepore™Vi RECORD OF TEST BORING rae Vorlacenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Oth St, Moni, Floriga moc NO Bat Loose, grey 5 SAND very safe, tan, wish cand Jorma | a4 Limestone {ssn ltrs, tan, with sone firar| 100 isan leone ser sew | 13V 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT/Micni Vorlacenter, NE tet Ave 4 NE Oth St, lanl, Floris BRIG NO ae PROLECT Me s46S6 START: 00/20/2014 FINISH 09/20/0014 MERTIER® Suny BORING LOCATION Se7440) € s22354 RRILLER 2. Corroa/Yuniel BRILL: Mobi te B59 TRILL CONTRACTOR WHS NS ELEVATION CEST.)++ 11.91°CHGVDD GRONBUATER: 6 Feet Capt DATE OEKED —_anvz0/e014 THESTURE-FRAGHENTS|veaiun dense, gray 4. SAND DATE CHECKED 8/20/2014 BORING METHOD: Rotery aril with wash, nud & casing FLUID LOSS None 7 Dense, gray He LIMESTONE FRAGMENTS| we | a " AND SAND "very ose, gray (PROBABLE FILLY we |e IMesiun dense, grey SILTY SAND os 20? Jew | ue E leone sand” cela LIMESTONE, \Sene sand ~ ve wl o fo very sort, tan, with 20 lsove sora ee = Sei attaMeh AEMng eect Geese sec cS agar” Ese otk Say Berlfation co = ind Pagan aRECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Miami Wor licenter, NE Ist Ave 4 NE th St, Mioni, Florioe BORING NO Bs Limestone % one sand we! 6 SAND ery sort san, wien “ LIMESTONE lars, tan, 1h sone lean eee | 100Q RECORD OF TEST BORING LIMESTONE ‘ANDRECORD OF TEST BORING PROECT NO 16366 START 08/27/2014 FINISH 08/21/2014 WEATHER Sumy BORING LOCATION N/S27590) £ 922008 DRILLER. dohnson/Rey ELEVATION CEST.2:+ 12.59°(NGVD GROLNDVATER 7.0 fet Cdopt) BATE CHEGED —oB/27/2014, BORING HETHOD Rotary aril vith wash, mud & casing Luma uss) Nex Sa Nery dense, ory PAS DATE ClECKED 00/20/2014 BORING HETHOD. Rotary drt with wash, mud & casing FLUID LOSS Nene . IE JCIMESTUNE FRAGMENTS ory dense, grey ear | 100 ” "7 & SAND. CPROBABLE Ms FIL Woderetely rar, ton, iE Jwith tone’ send er | 6 1 sort, tan, vith cone eens ew | at Limestone : Weey sors, tan, with Hi lzone send was | 7 : lese cond we] s q lLeoee, gray E sab ae] 6 ‘esate ef Eat fra Tepart af project ceotcomice Beers RS= ot nt ty Heaton CD [ipwta pot bestows tnt ump in he “heer are a Lier ftlon = aural stung cotet ©, A102 “b,n corned Conran Sear oe)RECORD OF TEST BORING FROAECTIMan1 Worlacenter, HE Ist Ave & NE Bth St Met, Flori rine 3398 outer no see START. O8/1/E014 FINISH. OO/L72014 MEATIER Suny fonine GEATIDN e789, €9e0446 Teusm 2. Conreartoniet TILL tote Bs2 Tek comecrowins ws ClevnriD4 cEST +» 1070/CHGYD CROUKWATER 3 feet Cpttd DATE CHEE —_onareo14 ORNG ETD tary ditt vith wesh, mud 8 casing FLUID LOSS. Nore S HL imestone rancnens|crclesyseacSt'o fee | 6 A NCPROBARE FILL = ny an og | fone ex | 0 : e coy ee | ao - i: | |Hard, tan, with sone ql ene ox | v0 Lvesrane ery soft, tan, ath ‘SAND [Medium dense, gray eee | 16NV RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT Mian! Vortdcenter, NE Lat Ave & NE Oth St, Mani, Florida mORING 1 B28 ‘SAND ery sort, tan, with leone sonal see | 12 ery sort, tan, with Jeon sore wal 6 LavesTONE, Very soft, tan, with ‘one ond jee | 19 oh ow | a7 Very soft, tan, with sci| RECORD CF TEST BORING Se oct, earns, Fhitn Mvevinus eae Sony Time uasrion srt sesce TRIER june erates uu naie Ba? DRI CONRACTOR rs sesso Goer UA tes ee ocr eee Bee ee eae oe Puta Lass one . BPE | estore reacrenss ve fa SAD fatima, ton | conan ries wo | : f eset sa ee | " ery sore tr, orth ioe srs “ | : ery sate er, ore | E) iMestone EST Sen eur| is i oe | os . owe, ro i ee| 6 ab LR Sart a lt, Serie opr eeSees err RECORD OF TEST BORING ROACH Mant Vortacenter, NE tet Ave L NE tH St lon, Flride mons 140 Prostct no 46S Staats /21/2014 FINISH 08/21/0014 EATER Sumy TORING LOcnTIO’ W586, © 920364 Bece a Cerre/tunet TRL waite B58 TILL coteAcom ws ELErIDN CS). 9.69 11.29"CNGVED GROLNBUATER 5 Feet depth) DATE CHECKED 08/14/2014 BORING NETH Rotary aril with wash, mud & casing FLUID LOSS None ca Weaiun dense, aray | | » CPOSSTRLE FILL ann vin sur [we 67-00 > | ee | 4 . very loose, rey Loose, rey wor] s Livestone [loose orev wal wel 6 loose, gray RITA ARR Ren tea ARES ont 2 aed forte egi V 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING FROUECTINIant Worldcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE Oth St, Mani, Flora RNG wo Be LIMESTONE, ery loose, ery san lvery tense, grey ae ery Loose, orey =. 03 10 « LanesTone we we | a | o “* 16 6 fernRECORD OF TEST BORING PRIJECT:Mieni Worldcenter, ME nt Ave UNE 8th St, Wiani, Flere mane wo 4a PROJECT MD 1aSS66 svar: 02/19/2014 FINISH 08/19/2018 VEATIER® Sunny BORING LOCATION NW S27707) F 92204 DRILLER Yunieskt Morales TRILL: Mobile B57 BRILL CONTRACTOR: MIS ELEVATION CEST.91+ 11.60"CHGVDD GROUNDWATER 6 feet Caepth) DATE CHECKED Oa/19/2014 BORING METHOD) Ratery dri with wah, mud & cosing FLUID LOSS None wo Al | amestone rRAchENTs| oe | a AND SAND sort, tan, ath sone (POSSIBLE FILL) [sana re | o sort, ten, with sve : sort, tan, with sone sand eo | at wk] soft, ton, with cone sand wow | 20 Looe, gray LIMESTONE, was] 9 Medium dence, gray wer | 2 Medium dense, gray ee] ia | ean) resin dese, rey Jd ee rd ‘eat Ringe par oF the lec ebm ct ae su REELS Rcastion A a ts eri rgVo RECORD OF TEST BORING PRIJECT:Niant Vorlaconter, ME Ist Ave & ME 8th St, Miant, Flartde ‘san : Nery loose, rey i pow | 2 : very toose, rey : pee | 2 = LIMESTONE i sand we! 2 : lara, tan, with sone fears] 100RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Mian! Wortdeentar, ME Ist Ave & NE 6th St, Miani, Florida BRING MH ad PROIECT NO 14666 START! 00/19/2014 FINISH 00/19/2014 VEATIER: Sunny BORING LocaTION.——N 527705) € 922277 DRILLER Yuniesks Morales TRILL Heeite BS? TRILL CONTRACTOR WS WS ELEVATION CEST.)s+ 979° CNGVED GRONBWATER: 2 Feet Gaepthd DATE CHEDED ——_owsi9/20%4 BERING METHOD Rotary Abit with mash, mud & casing FLUID LOSS None 7 {[CINESTUNE FRAGFENTS very dense, tan 2 1 SAND vel Fe} CPROBABLE FILL) Iyediun nord, tan, with E \zoe. sored rele Ie Iosoratety hard, tan, fe leith sone” ean velo ae lent ™ wow | 27 uivestonc fe son was | a0 i" leone Sond we | 7 wa! ese | 10 SAND eter to ate en age enurte abet fora teral Ifaration $= arent cory RCSA RAVES AE Taa aE ARSE nce ears me gtRECORD OF TEST BORING NV PROUECT Miomi Wor dcenter, NE Ist Ave & NE th St, Mani, Floris oRING NO B44 ad ‘SAND lord, tan, with sone pr-ov] 100 te LIMESTONE leant ww | very sort, tan, with one ond we | 9 oderately tard, tan, (etn sone ara ow | a7 sort, tan, vite sone sand sew | 20 ‘Sone Sond“ eel 7 Hard, ton, with sone fora] 100\\ | RECORD OF TEST BORING ene ere ee ae el of & oy eeenencs sci16RECORD OF TEST BORING FROKEN Mont Worlaconter, ME Iat Ae 8 AE 6th St, Han, Florida porns 1 Bs resect 6586 STAN) 08/19/6014 FINISH GB/1/2014 EATER Sumy fowins Loerie W Serra) 980108 DRILLER Yaron Mores WL Nobile B57 TILL cORTRICTOR WS Etovrioncest sr 11-28chovb> GeGNOMATER 8 feet GpthD DATE CIEOKED—_ab/197¢014 TORING HET Retry des with wash mud casing FLUID LOSS. oe 0 UME Limestone FracMents| orl ao Be |e SaNCPROBABLE. [sore, gray, wth cone FLD sts wef Nery sort, oy with : soc Sand «|» : horstely tra tan orton ena ofa wy sort. orev. with sone Sen ww | os Limestone [bem orey er eam dee, grey war | ae ecm dene, gry vols saxo ein dense, ory ROMS SRS SEG TERT ASRS le co EPO og Siceret ne ig Ss pte, ee dR Pree gor i nn oo Co oo Serie ene eeeRECORD OF TEST BORING Rucci Nteisaner thes Ie nw Ht, Fei IMEI feensen vee |__| ferent |e leon aor | heya en |__| ete F ene Sora’ "esa | as sa]RECORD OF TEST BORING NV. Pe idiceee min erseens san, rine sommio ¥9 = a esacRECORD OF TEST BORING eee nee ee econ eet ee eee Sut alee antares we ° )f|CTRESTONEFRAGHENTS |Hediun dense, brow TENS Sco le if in mda ia if ec mallee F eee if tone car oe | op umsioe fey em 1) are san wth cow ess ele ” eres | 13 sao edn ee, wom SRE? eS THEESE Eee eet Eger "hc ied eran Seg ar St aRECORD OF TEST BORING PROXECT Mani Wer dcenter, NE tat Ave INE Oth St, Miani, Florida BRING HO: B46 aay) ak Saas oe on a aT ‘SAND salen LanestONe Dense, rey ‘saxo Loose, gray ; Very hora, tan, with [eee | soo i: very sors, sary with HF) cinestane [sone send ew | 32V5 RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Mien! Uorldcentsr, NE Jat Ave K NE th St, Mani, Florida BORING MO BAT PRLECT ND 16366 START) 0/25/2014 FINISH 08/25/2014 VEATHER Surry BORING LOCATION 527050) © Seance TRILLER— Yunieski Morales DRILL Nobile 8-57 DRILL CONTRACTOR NS ELEVATION CEST. 2+ 11.98" CHGVDD GROUNDVATER —@ Feet Cdepth) DATE CHECKED. 08/25/2014 BORING YETHOD Rotary aril with wash, mud & cesing FLUID LOSS: None oan Loose, orev wets . : LL.79/CMD GROMBUATER 8 fet Campth) BATE EDKED e204 {RING FETED Rotory ceil with wash, md & casing FLUID LHe Cees) 2002s 3 2 Ps StLTY san CPOSSTBLE FILL |oedium dense, tan ee |e eas hard, ray * tn one so or | a Livestone fiery sty tan th a * sana cian dense, orey irae Me Reece ae ASTER Ion on SPOUSE Sgt aeh tg Pal SS Tek pacts" °" aay Recon Fon Ue Ma Stee °F Ua ed gine Serge ood niin Uae ceaVo RECORD OF TEST BORING PROJECT: Mian! Worlacenter, ME st Ave & NE Oth St, Mani, Foride Horn No BB r= sano ery soft, tan, with [sone sor ese | aL 1) lors, gray, with sone fer-ere| 100 | Limestone sand sone sora see] ieRECORD OF TEST BORING PRO.ECTINIoni Vorlacenter, NE st Ave & NE Sth St, Mani, Floride manG B49 PROUT NO 14686 START: a/e6/2014 FINS 09/26/2014 VEATIER Sunny BORING LOCATION ——-N S27OKR 390, € Sez066. 799 TRILLER —¥. Garcto”h TRILL Hobie B52 DRILL CONTRACTOR MSS vorales ELEVATION CEST.) 9.67/CNGVID GROUNDWATER 9.0 Feet Capt DATE CHECKED ogvas,2014 BORING HETHOD ——Rotery dri with wash, mud & casing uur Lass: NONE Ee [FTNESTUNE FRAGHENTS] very aenae, gray iB] AND san | wel n FT} CPROBARLE FILLY |sore, tan, with sone ote ii sind ww | is Mesias hors, an, with i one cond oe | A Median hard, tan, with E Sone sora ™ ee — |i | Limestone is sort, tan, with sone if and war | 2 i Medium dense, gray if wees | ze sand ediun dense, grey ese | 21 Riraenre eileen srecetean unm aaa TER cw Feees occmert meee eae Shee cence ee aa) = Netin Cage SecN \ 5 RECORD OF TEST BORING THESE NGan) Wider, PE Lt A EME Oth Ste Hes Florin. maa 0s san lary sof, en, et ti Ball ot. cawesrone ay ar, ey are . ie St se'|| a0 in ta tn, wrth . ene ao | 30 per, tn win ane fore] sn . etn ares vn || had ‘SAND iad ee | ia nestei \ RECORD OF TEST BORING oer ctr, AE et oe HE SK Hany Here ns 0 bs ic] camestone re, tan with ee tata er ; bell sie tan an rf sory on wy ae el Fl] uivestone erm | 2 3 [acne cand “Ws | E Jaren sove’cand "eye 50 lara, von ern sre | a | 100NWO RECORD OF TEST BORING FRILECTIMlan Vorldcenter, NE Ist Ave E NE Sth St, Mianl, Floriaa nesting ine tm ern sone | ges | ano era, ton, with sow | ies | 00 anda Nesereteiy hard, tan era tan witn some | a | 00 sin nar. tan, with sana fers] 0Vi RECORD OF TEST BORING PRILECTMiant Morlacenter, NE ist Ave NE Gth St, Miami, Florida oRING NO BS PROECT Mh 146566 ‘STAR o9/ae/eal4 FINISH 09/02/2014 VEATHER Surry, BERING LOCATION SE7916.E97; € 980095. 465, TRIMER. Garcia” TRILL! Mobi Ve 6-52 DRILL CONTRACTORS WS Hereten ELEVATION CEST. 9+ 10,46°CNGVE) GROUNDWATER: 2 Feet Cdepth) DATE CHECKED 08/08/2014 BORING METHOD Rotary driLt with wash, mud & cesing FLUID Loss: WO of? a Dense, arey FE Limesrone Feacnents wel In) AND SAND Ioense, gray fi) ————— al 5 Be 2 = —} +t | 3 1 SS SS At. | [Ie i 3B 2 iF 2 af § ae] | | ae 2 ys 3] | 2] gt é y ; e S 4 = Ta a] 5 az] | |98] | {3 23 "| es nA g E ) |: & 2 e elidel | |g iy 8 5 3] | 4 g% a 2 He | Pe ee 4 TWh |g 2 | B ly: BIg E fEs 4 “PIULET TT IE ee 8 pee ee | > lee = BREE ais sane shits [Ep 3 Tested By: Pt AndroveREPORT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST ne a Jo] 42 i 3 eS a i aa fo] Ale ode y CESSES SESS SEES ile) | | 3 als) | 143 1 a eee oh ef a ie) aus wise Poorly grea San : i j 2 | i Depths 2-4 staple Manoers S-23.) | PL A : HH: E i Fle 1S) se é ty ge | 2e 6 5 3a iit 5 32 i # 2 — eg} | Le q Fy 3 5 wees ee eee ae 3 > Ac 3 3 3 | A i z- er) | |e Ae = al etl | 24 é als 4 é o aa feaasoanfenchones — el | [4 : i 5. ——= ale} | 198] | |2 =o 8 _ ESSE pate AT | CELL AG Kt bene d ene nafee enon nn, poate eden e eben nbone. 2 2 5” 5 a Sepepespectcs A ef 5 SSE Fiele| | (8 fy y a als S| aa 2 2 3° wi afenefonndenn sponses 2-fe--4----f---} =: le a igs . 2 Ig Efe + H Bae fe. 8 © ¢ . * @ 2 * | Bee a etna atte euolpzus Tested By PJ pnirowsREPORT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST LI LLE . : 2 3] a z 7 2 2 LI a A mse : 3 =) {4 gla a : i ie a Ig a 2 Bs ttt +a tt ; THE Fi Tea sanple Markers $5 ae Bas vrajec Mani Vortdcenter, NE Let Ave & NE 8th St, Mian, Floride Tiley GAD with orwet Tape an aE Testes By Pid AndrewsREPORT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST is i . Li — “ao [oss ine | tet as a gos m Bas, Nes on 3; 2 ort z aise ts Wee —— Cer ject Mian! Vorldcenter, HE ist Ave & NE Gth St, Mont, Flora losanpted By Garcia Sarple Date 08/08/2014 Location 9-28 Depths 4-6 Sample Maer $-3 Tested By Pd rdrewsREPORT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST co I Bia aie mo 2. 31365 Tap 3.1968 PAIN SE — me a aaa Teg a ewes a 3.3087 [> Poarty orasea Sar OSerotea By ¥. Garcia resect Miami Wortdeenter, NE Ist Ave 8 NE Gth St, Mion, Florida resect na 1scsce m0 Tested By) Pu Anareve3 | E 28 i i L i 33 H Js] | se si =| {7 gle 73 ge | ae . e Et is a 3 2 SPE rt te | | FE ei ig} | Ce 3 4 2 SSS : N SS see] 5x8] = . . 3 2 le y A - § | | fs Zz. e f Hs Ae | le a4 oe E = — ce a s [fbb re ey i i if Zend] ||| | BE 3 jie gf “ APLLEPLU BPs ———E . | 3 ge # rls Ry # “PHELETT TIE fez oe) se 3 8 @ #8 @ 2 e 4 pee jon im sttbtetH |f le 2 x 3) Tested Bye BJ AndeensREPORT OF GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS TEST i ] r |i | | sk i 7] ge WW & Fle} | ls 7 : Ll ae | ze 5 d aie 5] 53° 55 = 4 eT ft ie vias a a Hag | |e : z del | gal] (3 2 aantennd ane deenbanntone i i 2? SEEEEESESES | | |e ivy : | i “WL B jet s 2 F : lee | pus voons o S io LEE Tested By PJ. Andrewse ae 2 . a TA | eT e | |" aif 2 “6 led 5 iw 43 HE g 5 a is A = dal a al 38 Ei Ps dal | Ae = ‘ ; 8 Sees fe\5-| | (Ie 3 a 2 |a/2 i i 5 | z § arael | le g = als & & So oS a aol | 98] | [2 ; = s ell. le? = alo] | [ge ze jee 5 als] | As e leg SS e 1 E ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ' | iB |g lg sire =i t |e: ao 8 8 § #8 @ =e B ez Ibe ‘ BLES sous woos stirs! ole ‘Sone Bote: 02/08/2014 Iepts 2-4 Sarple Number: 5-23 5 28 4 2 ie L 2 y Were Be } ey Oe las E 4 ais 5 3 is? iS 2 abe ee ee 2 q Ig 4 < see — I ae 5 a 2 ae) | Te i z q 's2| | |s ar a as) | As | |e 2% & — fr 3|s g 2g ue al | 2 vi a SSS SSS sal | AR) | LE aoe & Spy é A 23 go als) | [As aye . = TE Aga? # |g 5 is * | B |e? ¢ ge @ 8 @ # 9 «#8 @ 3) 2 lei 3 pus weiss stds Ss lee o Tested Bye Bid éndrevs