Professional Documents
Culture Documents
81
Table 61
82
83
84
85
86
87
Figure 64
88
89
Use of testing
Source of tests
Test publishers
Computer-Interactive Testing
Types of tests
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
810
Online tests
Telephone prescreening
Offline computer tests
Virtual inbox tests
Online problem solving tests
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
811
Aptitude tests
Tests that measure specific mental abilities, such as
inductive and deductive reasoning, verbal
comprehension, memory, and numerical ability.
812
813
814
Source: Reproduced by permission. Copyright 1967, 1969 by The Psychological Corporation, New York, NY. All rights
reserved. Authors note: 1969 is the latest copyright on this test, which is still the main one used for this purpose.
Figure 6 5
815
Advantage
Tests have been used successfully to predict
dysfunctional job behaviors and identify successful
candidates for overseas assignments.
816
Agreeableness
The tendency to be trusting, compliant, caring, and gentle.
Conscientiousness
Is comprised of two related facets: achievement and dependability.
Other Tests
Interest inventories
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
817
Achievement tests
Test that measure what a person has
already learnedjob knowledge in areas
like accounting, marketing, or personnel.
818
819
820
821
Figure 66
Work Simulations
Management assessment center
A simulation in which management candidates
are asked to perform realistic tasks in
hypothetical situations and are scored on their
performance.
822
Management games
Individual presentations
Objective tests
The interview
823
824
Checks
Extent of investigations and checks
Reference checks (87%)
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
825
826
Reference Name:
Dates of Employment:
Company Name:
(From: and To:) Position(s) Held:
Salary History:
Reason for Leaving:
Explain the reason for your call and verify the above information with the supervisor (including the
reason for leaving)
1.Please describe the type of work for which the candidate was responsible.
2.How would you describe the applicants relationships with coworkers, subordinates (if applicable), and
with superiors?
3.Did the candidate have a positive or negative work attitude? Please elaborate
4.How would you describe the quantity and quality of output generated by the former employee?
5.What were his/her strengths on the job?
6.What were his/her weaknesses on the job?
7.What is your overall assessment of the candidate?
8.Would you recommend him/her for this position? Why or why not?
9.Would this individual be eligible for rehire? Why or why not?
Other comments?
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
827
Figure 67
828
829
830
831
632
633
2.
3.
634
4.
8.
9.
Figure 68
635
636
Figure 68 (contd)
637
Other exceptions
Hiring of private security personnel
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
638
639
640
Graphology
Graphology (handwriting analysis)
Assumes that handwriting reflects basic
personality traits.
Graphologys validity is highly suspect.
Figure 68
641
Physical Examination
Reasons for preemployment medical
examinations:
To verify that the applicant meets the
physical requirements of the position
To discover any medical limitations you
should take into account in placing the
applicant.
To establish a record and baseline of the
applicants health for future insurance or
compensation claims.
To reduce absenteeism and accidents
642
Types of tests
Urinalysis
Hair follicle testing
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
643
644
3.
Require all new employees to complete and sign the INS I9 form to certify that they are eligible for employment.
4.
Examine documentation presented by new employees,
record information about the documents on the verification
form, and sign the form.
5.
Retain the form for three years or for one year past the
employment of the individual, whichever is longer.
6.
If requested, present the form for inspection by INS or
Department of Labor officers.
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
645
HR Scorecard
for Hotel Paris
International
Corporation*
646
647
648
profitability)
Figure 69
Key Terms
negligent hiring reliability test
validity criterion validity content
validity expectancy chart
interest inventory work samples
work sampling technique
management assessment
center
2005 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675