Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Read 462 Emily Veeser SPR 2016
Read 462 Emily Veeser SPR 2016
TEACHER CANDIDATE:
DATE:
Emily Veeser
DISTRICT:
SCHOOL:
Bonita USD
MASTER TEACHER:
GRADE:
Mrs. Van Hernholm
FIELDWORK SUPERVISOR:
Susan Millett
Read the following statements and check the box that best reflects your opinion of the
statement.
Not Present
Emerging
Competent
Exceptional
X
Candidate demonstrates
professional behavior while
interacting with fieldwork supervisor,
school site supervisor, and students.
Please comment on the overall performance of this teacher candidate using the criteria
listed above plus any additional criteria observed during the semester.
For the most part, Emily followed her lesson plan as written. The round-robin with the pre-assessment
went pretty well; if she had encouraged the students to guess at the meaning, there might have been
more variety. (some Ss copied what the previous child wrote.) The students loved the read-aloud, and
almost all participated. Both during the read-aloud and during the video, Emily pointed out the
vocabulary and its context as they went along. The glossary got skipped. When she went back to the list
on the board, Emily gave them most of the definitions, asking for a few from the class. The word
sort went well. Emily needed to model the writing of the final short paragraph with the goal of using the
words to talk about wolves. What she got instead was three or four sentences of definitions. Overall,
however, it was well done, and the students were very engaged.
By marking the box below, I, the University Supervisor, verify and acknowledge that the above
evaluation was completed collaboratively by myself, the student teacher candidate, and schoolsite supervisor as listed above.