Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Imprint of Faith On Viking Culture As Opposed To Mainland Culture (With A Focus On Male and Female Value Systems)
The Imprint of Faith On Viking Culture As Opposed To Mainland Culture (With A Focus On Male and Female Value Systems)
person played had a focus on the afterlife. Though this was true however,
they also had a sort of fatalism. In Viking Paganism, the universe, life, and
time itself would eventually end in Ragnarok, where the Godly beings would
battle (using the Viking warriors as infantry,) resulting in the end of the world
as we know it.2
Christians, in comparison, lived day-to-day simply with a sense of fault.
Sin was the biggest concern besides eating and surviving. Masculinity in the
sense of the Christian person during the Viking Age in Mainland Europe,
could only truly be manifested by a warrior or a person of high stature. And
even then, fighting, killing, and dying would have all been connected to sin
at one point or another, never truly giving or denying a pious person entry to
Heaven, and never truly being a central theme in the quest for an afterlife.
(A bishop may promote fighting for ones lord while a priest may rail against
it with threats of hell, leaving a common subject in a state of limbo.) There
was no reason to train and fight except in the case of an invasion or defense
of ones homestead. So masculinity did not effect a Christians daily life in
any real way.
Women in Scandinavian Viking culture seem to have been able to
exercise their opinion and freedom in ways very rare for the time period. This
impressive social freedom came not only from tradition and culture however,
but also may have had divine influence. In Norse mythology, there seem to
2 Pg. 26, John Haywood, The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings (Hist Atlas), 16th
ed. (London: Penguin (Non-Classics), 1995).
assumed that very few tears would be shed over her husbands departure.
According to the lectures of Cynthia Polecritti at the University of California
Santa Cruz7, the women left behind developed a strong sense of
independence and responsibility that was very important to the structure of
Norse society. They often owned land with the death of their husband and
they could also be given a third of their husbands property in the case of a
divorce which they could even initiate- a privilege very rare in cultures of this
period globally- even those of continental Europe. The mothers held
responsibility over finances and in the case of the husbands departure or
death, the elder women/ widows could be very influential landowners. As
seen in Njals Saga, women could even incite feuds: one instance in chapter
116 of the saga gives the example of Hildigunnur igniting a feud because of
the murder of her husband8. This dedication to kin and independence is only
a part of her whole influence though and can be connected to the love,
beauty, and sex portion of her association. The other part of Freyas being
and influence is far more powerful and far more important.
Freyjas general power was known to come in the form of beauty, but she
also had roots in battle, death, and magic. Her influence over warriors came
in many forms, but one of the most important was her reign over the
dominion of Flkvangr9. As Odin had his Valhalla, so did Freyja have her plane
where she presided over the souls of half those slain in battle. In Flkvangr
lies Sessrmnir, the hall where warriors drink and sing, eat and celebrate in
death. Contrasting this to the heaven of Christians, one of broad beauty and
perfection, protection and strict entry requirements, it shows the amazing
divide between the cultures and values of the Norse and the mainland
Europeans. Valhalla and Flkvangr give a picture of a joyous, celebratory
realm of what Christians would see as gluttony and sin in general, but is
something that truly had to be earned. The Christian idea of heaven involves
following abstract rules given to you not only by God, but also his Bishops
and Priests whose dictations may shift over time. Entry into heaven did not
necessarily require the person to do anything except maybe go to service
and abstain from (or confess) sin. Entry into Valhalla or Flkvangr involved
years of training to be a warrior, participation in society, and eventually the
requirement to be slain in battle- something that cannot be taken lightly,
even in the face of an eternity of celebration in honor. In that sense, there
was a real, definable reason to work and participate in your society- not just
to survive, but to build yourself to a glorious afterlife. And even though, as
said in Haywoods Atlas of the Vikings10, we have no blatantly direct evidence
of war-maidens, the simple presence of a strong divine representation for
9 Pg. 26, John Haywood, The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings (Hist Atlas), 16th
ed. (London: Penguin (Non-Classics), 1995).
10 John Haywood, The Penguin Historical Atlas of the Vikings (Hist Atlas), 16th ed.
(London: Penguin (Non-Classics), 1995).
women was enough to give Viking women a strong lead over those in the
mainland. Not to mention, women in Christianity were blamed for humanitys
expulsion from Eden- a crime that can be used to justify putting women
under men. In Viking society there really is no justification for inequalitythere were gods of both gender who played strong roles in creation and
history; in fact, the original god Ymir was a hermaphrodite, not a man, not a
woman11. And though we do not necessarily know of a plane of afterlife for
notable (or ordinary) women specifically besides the all encompassing
Helheim, we can see from archaeological evidence that notable women
were buried not only in huge, expensive ships, but also with jewelry,
clothing, and other grave goods. This can be seen best in the Oseberg Ship,
known as one of the most bountiful archaeological discoveries attributed to
the Vikings12. Though some sources say that the bountiful contents of the
burial were simply for show, evidence suggests that the burial could also
have been to (like it was for men,) leave items for them to have in the
afterlife. There is no absolute evidence for either case, but in many cultures,
such as Ancient Egypt, grave goods were literally meant to be translated into
the afterlife: Being buried with a ship or a servant, (or even a picture of one
in some cases,) would mean you possessed that thing or person in death.13
There is little reason to question whether this could have been the case for
11 The Creation of the Cosmos - Norse Mythology for Smart People, 2012,
accessed November 30, 2016, http://norse-mythology.org/tales/norse-creationmyth/.
12 Lectures of Cynthia Polecritti, UC Santa Cruz, 2016
broken by a new faith. In the minds of the Scandinavian people, Thor still
served not only as a divine role model, but as a figure of personal heritage as
well, giving Norse men a sense of community, tradition, and patrimony while
retaining their masculinity. Norse masculinity was also important for another
purpose however: rule.
Mainland Christian European rule was a varied topic: sometimes rulers
were labeled (or labeled themselves,) divinely ordained- such was the case
with Pepin the Short and his son Charlemagne, by having the pope ordain the
kingship15- and was often based on inheritance, not necessarily on strength.
Rulers could pass their rule down to their sons without much question and
their subjects would generally oblige. Viking rule however, seems to have
been based not only on honor but also on strength instead of strictly fatherto-son inheritance. In Norse social structure, there is generally thought to be
three different loosely based social standings16: the rll was the lowest
class of slaves and those bonded to another man because of debt. If they
resisted this bond, their punishment could have been physically severe but
also would have meant a loss of honor- something very important to Gods
and men. The Karls were the middle class- the normal craftsmen and low
warriors, farmers and commoners. The highest class were the Jarls- those
who won over the will of the people through their show of strength, honor,
valor, or brute force. This class is where the idea of masculinity comes most
importantly. A Jarl could pass down his title and property to his son, but a
Karl could also theoretically become a Jarl simply by showing himself as the
better leader or warrior. He could gain followers, amass wealth, gain land,
and take power by gaining the trust of those around him. This is a tradition
that can be traced through tribal traditions, but can also be seen as a
product of a smaller, more democratic community. Theoretically, this
democratic practice can also be attributed to the gods as well. Though there
is Odin, the head god, he overthrew the original elder Ymir- and his fellow
gods through the lore dont seem to simply submit to Odins rule, even
conducting a war between the sir and the Vanir. So not only does their
tribal heritage promote a form of democracy that comes from a primal
respect of power, but it also comes from (or itself developed into,) the Norse
Pagan faith where the Gods like Thor and Odin promote masculinity and
violence.
In conclusion, Norse Paganism when analyzed, is a complex faith that
ties in immensely to the cultures and day-to-day lives of the Scandinavian
peoples- into their specific form of masculinity and femininity, their ideas on
the afterlife, their relationships, and their systems of rule. It seems nearly
every facet of Scandinavian being was intertwined with their faith and their
faith was developed intertwined with their culture and their surroundings.