Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wettability 2 PDF
Wettability 2 PDF
13933
Many methuds have been used to measure wettabtity. This paper describes the three quantitative
Summary.
methods in use to&y: contact angle, Amott method, and the U.S. Bureau of Mines (USBM) method. The
advantages and fimitationa of alf the qualitative methods-inrblbition, microscope examination, flotation, glaas
slide, relative permeability curves, capilkmy pressure curves, capiffarinretric method, displacement capillary
pressure, penneabiLhy/saturation relationships, and reservoir logsare covered. Nuclear magnetic resomnce
(NMR) and dye adsorption, two methods for measuring fractional wettabflily, are also discussed. Fdy,
a
metbud is proposed to determine whether a core haa mixed wettabilhy.
Introduction
Thispaper is the second in a series of fitcrature surveys
covering the effects of nettability on core analysis. 1-3
Changes in the wettabtity of cores have been shown to
affect electrical propertica, capillary pressure, waterflood
behavior, relative penncabtity, dispersion, and simulated
EOR. For core analysis to predict tbe behavior of the
reservoir, the nettability of the core must be the sime
aa the nettability of the undisturbed reservoir reck.
When a drop of water is placed on a surface immersed
in oil, a cuntsct angle is formed that rsngis from Oto 180
[0 to 3.14 rad]. A typical oil/water/soIid system is shown
in Fig. 1, where the surface energies in the system are
reIated by Youngs equation, 4
rad], the greater the wetting preference for one fluid over
another. If 8 is exactly 90 [1.6 rad], neither fluid
preferentially wets the solid. As shown in Table 1, when
O is behveen O and 60 to 75 [0 and I twl.3 rad], the
system is defined as water-wet. When 6 is between 180
and 105 to 120 [3.1 and 1.8 tu 2.1 rad], the system is
defined m oil-wet. In the middle range of cnntsct angles,
a systcm is neutrally or intermediately wet. The contact
angfe that is chosen as the cutoff varies fmrn paper to
paper.
The term am n., is sometimes called the adhesion
tension, LTA
5:
~A=v m Ows=aowcose.
am Cos 19=uo$-u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..
where
aow = interracial energy [interracial tension (IFT)]
between the oil and water,
LTO,= interfaced energy between the oil and
did,
o~, = interracial energy between the water and
solid, and
9 = contact angle, the angle of the
waterloillsolid contact line.
By convention, the contact angle, O, is me~ured
tbrougb the water. Tbe interracial energy uOWis equal to
o, the IFT.
As sbowmin Fig. 1, when the contact angle is less than
90 [1.6 rad], the surface is preferentially water-wet, and
when it is greater than 90 [1.6 rad], the surface is
preferentially oil-wet. For almoat all pure flrdda and clean
rock or F&shed crystal surfaces, IJo, and UWhave values
such that O=0 [0 rad]. When compounds such as crudeoil components are adaorbed on rock surfaces, these intcrfacisl energica arc changed unequalfy. fMs changes
Oand hence the wettabtity. The farther Ok from 90 [1.6
CQwrmltsm %e~.! Pemleum
Em.e.=
1246
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...(2)
. . (1)
The adh+ion tension is positive when the system is waterwet, negative when the system is oil-wet, and near zero
when thesystem is neutmfly wet.
Mathods of Wettabitity Measurement
MaJJy different methods have been proposed for measuring the wettabtity of a system. 616 They include quantitative methods-contact angles, imbibition and forced
displacement (Amott), and USBM wettabfity method
and qualitative mcthoda-imbibition rates, micmscope examination, flotation, glaas slide method, relative p&rnreabdity curves, penneabilitykdumtion
relationships,
capillary pressure curves, capiflmimetric method, displacement capif.larypressure, reservoir logs, nuclear nrsgnetic resonance, and dye adsorption.
Although no single accepted method exists, tbrcc quantitative methods generally are used: (1) contact-angle
measurcnrent, (2) the Amntt 6 method (imbibition and
forced displacement), and (3) the USBM method. g.17.18
The contact angle mcasurea the wettsbilhy of a spccitic
su$ace, while the Amott and USBM methods measure
the average wettsbility of a core. A comparison of the
wettsbllhy criteria for the three metbuds is shown in Table 1. we remaining tests in the fist are qualitative, each
with somewhat different criteria to determine the degree
of water or oil wetness. Unfortunately, tbk leads to amJourmJo! PetroleumTechnology,November1986
F1.a. 1Wettabilitv
of the oil/water/rnck
TABLE 1APPROXIMATE
RELATIONBHIP BETWEEN WSTTABILITY,
CONTACT
AND THE USSM AND AMOTT WETTABIUTY
INDZXES
Contact angle
Minimum
Maximum
USBM nettability index
Amott nettability index
Displacement.by-water ratio
Displacement-by-nil ratio
Amoti-Harvey nettability index
Joumal
1986
svstem. 16
Water-Wet
Neutrally Wet
00
60 to 75
W naar 1
60 to 75
105 to 1200
W near O
Positive
Zero
0.3s/s1.0
Zem
Zero
-0.3 </<0.3
ANGLE,
Oil-Wet
to 1200
160
W near -1
105
Zero
Positive
-1.0</s
-0.3
1247
:E
i
CRKiTAL
WATER
OIL
*~ l-&#.
..
CRYSTAL
l.
____..
Fig. 3-Approach
__J
to equilibrium
contact angla.m
[a)
1-
.1
I
I
I
1~
L__.___;
(b)
Fig. 2Contar$angle
measurement.
tabiilty of the cleaned core. If it is not strongly ivaterwet, addhional cleaning is necessay.
AIuott Method. The Amott method 6.8.36combines im.
hibition and forced displacement to mcaaure the average
wetmbili~ of a core. Both reservoir core and fluids can
be used in the test. The Amott method is baaed on the
fact that the wetting fluid will generally imbibe spontaneously into the cure, dkplacing the nonwetting one. The
tatio of apontaneouaimbibition to fumed imMbition is used
tu kduCe the influence of other factors, such m Elative
permeability, viscosity, and the initial saturation of the
rock.
Core is prepared by centrifuging under brine until the,
residwd oil saturation (ROS) is rcabhed. The Amott wettabilhy measurement then consists of the following four
atcps: (1) immerse the core in oil, and meamre the volume
of water displaced by the spontaneous (free) imbibition
of oil after 20 hours; (2) centrifuge the core in oil until
the irreducible water saturation (lWS) is reached, and
measure the total amount of water displaced, including
the volume displaced by spontaneous imbibition; (3) immerre the core in brine, atrd measure the volume of 01
spontaneously displaced by imbibition of water after 20
hours; and (4) centrifuge the core in oil until ROS is
reached, atrd meaaure the total amount of oil displaced.
Note that the core may be driven to IWS and ROS by flow
rather than with a centrifuge. This is especially necessary
for unconsolidated material that cannot be centrifuged.
The tmt restdta are expressed by (1) the displacementby-oil ratio the ratio of the water volume displaced by
spnntatmms oil imbibition alone, VW,P to the total displaced by oil imbMion and centrifugal (forced) displacement, Vm,
~o=+, .............................(3a)
w,
L=+. ..
0,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..(3b)
..
of
PetroleumTechnolo~,i%enber 1986
I=8W80=++.
01
*
10
WATER
SATURATION,
I 00
iVERAGE
PERCENT
I 00
AVERAGE
WATER
SATURATION
PERCENT
Ii
k/ERAGE
NEUTRAL
WATER
LOQA,/A~=
SAT URATION,
0.02
\ PERCENT
!
lg. 4-USBM
wettcbility measurement 9: (Ibrine drive. U-oil
osilanes, (c) core pretreated with oil for 324 hours at 140R
of the favorable
free-energy
change,
the work
drive) (a) untreated core, (b) cora treated with organochlobrine contains 1,000 ppm sodium tripolyphosphdte.
The zreas under the brine- znd oil-&lve curves zre used
to calcufate the USBM index, while the Amott index uses
the volumes of free and totzl water znd oil displacements.
During the initizl oil-drive step (Curve 1), the plugs are
driven to IWS. Next, the cores we immersed in water,
and the vulume of water that imbibes freely is measured
(Curve 2). During the brine-dive step (Curve 3), the average saturation of the plug is determined from the zmount
of expelled uil at each incremental capilla~ pressure.
These data zre used to cslculate the area under the brinedrive curve, A2, for the USBM method. At the end of
the brine-drive step, the plug is left at ROS. The Amott
displacement-by-water ratiu, 5 ~, is the ratig of the oil
vulume displaced by free brine imbibition to the totzl
volume displaced by free imbibition znd centrifugzJ dkplacement (Eq. 3a).
In the fourth step (Curve 4), the plug is immersed in
oil, znd the volume uf oil thzt imbibes spontaneously is
measured. The finzl step is the oil drive (curve 5), where
the czpillmy pressures znd average saturations are used
to czhxdate A, for the USBM method. Eq. 5 is then used
to calculate the USBM wettzbili~ index. At the end of
the oil drive, the plug is left at IWS. The Amott dkplacement-by-oil ratio, 60, is the ratio of the free oil imbibition to the totzl volume displaced by free imbibkion and
centiitlzgal displacement (Eq. 3b).
There zre two advzntzges of the combined USBM/
Amott method over the stzndard USBM method51: tbe
resolution of the USBM method is improved by accounting for the saturation chznges that occur at zero capillary
pressure, znd the Amott index is ZISOcalculated. As discussed eadier, the AMOttmethod will sometimes indicate
that a system is nonuniformly wetted.
Qualitative Wettabiti,tyMeaaurementi
Imbibition
Method. The most cummonly used qunMztive nettability measurement is the imbibition method, 52.57because it gives a quick but rough idea of the
wettsb~hy without requiring zny complicated equipment.
The originzl imbibition appzrztus tested the wettabfity
at mom temperature and pressure. 52
More recently, Kyre er al. 57 described a modification
of the apparatus that zllows wettzbility to be measured
at reservoir conditions. In zn imbibition test, a core at
IWS is first submerged in brine undementb a graduated
cyliider, znd the rzte and zmount of oil dkplzced by brine
imbbitiun zre measured. The core ii strongly watier-wet
if l.zrgevolumes of brine are rzpidly imbibed, while lower rates znd smzller volumes imply a more wezkfy waterwet core. If no water is imbibed, the core is either oilwet or neutrzlly wet. Non-water-wet cores zre then driven
to ROS znd submerged in oiI. The imbibition apparaNs
is inverted, with the grzduated cylinder below the core
to measure the rate and volume of water dkplaced by uil
imtdbltiom If the core imbibes oil, it is oil-wet. The
strength of uil-wetness is Miczted by the rste and volume
uf oif imbibition. If neither oil nor water is imbibed, the
cure.is neuuslly wet. Finzlly, some cores will imbibe both
water ~d ofi. 49-s] These cores hzve either fiaCtiOnidor
mixed wettab~ky. One problem with the imbibition
method is that, in addition to wettahiity, imbMion ratez
zlso depend on relative permeabfity, viscosity, IFT, pure
structure, znd the initial saturation of the core. 3,10 Frequently, this dependence on other vzriables ia reduced by
1251
1.0
0.8 -
0.6 -
zL
:
0.4-
$2
K
5
5
#
:
0.2WATER
WATER
SATURATION
PV
(0)
100
1(
AvERAGEWATERSATURATION,
PERCENTW
Fig. 5Combhmd
Amott/USBM
method.51
comparison of the measured imbibition rate with a reference rate measured when the core is strongly water-wet.
To do this, the core is cleaned by heating at 750F
[400C] for 24 hours to oxidize alf of the organic material, leaving the core strongly water-wet. The core is then
remturated m ita origiual oiJ aatnration with a refined white
oil having the same viscosity aa the crude oiJ, and fhe
reference imbibition rate is measured. Denekaa et al. 53
~~~
nettability changes in terms of the relative rate
of Imbibitiorx
WATER
R=<,
m.
where
If = relative rate of imbibition,
A = initial imbibition rste of the cnre just after
it is submerged (cm3 /s), and
ritr = iuitial imbibition rate of the cleaned,
strongly water-wet core (cm3 Is).
If,the core is water-wet, m is the initial water imbMiOn
rate. If the core is oil-wet, ri is the initial oil imbibkion
rate, and the relative imbibition rate, R, is reported as
a negative number. Note, however, that whife the use of
a reference rate reduces tie effect of other variables, tie
irnbMion method still suffers from the same problem as
the Arnott method-insensitivity near neutraf wettabifily.
Bobek et al. 52 alau suggested an imbibition.teat for unconsolidated cores. In tbia test, a thin layer of sand is
spread on a microscope slide, after which the oif saturation is increased by addition of a refined minemf oil.
Dropleta of water am then placed on the surface of the
sand, srrd the movement of the fluid k observed by rnicm1252
SATURATION
O/. PV
(b)
Fig. 6Typh2al water/oil relative pemreabilily curvaa bc!
on the effective permeability to oil, at the resetvoir cl
nate water saturation; (a) strongly water-wet rock,
strongly oil-wet rock.
Glass SIide Method. Another esrly qualitative nettability meaaurcment tcduzique is the @as slide methnd, 30,m
which assumes thst a glass surfsce is representative of
the reservoir rock. A clean, dry, glaas microscope slide
is suapmrded in a layer of cmdc oif floating on water in
a transparent contsiuer ~d aged. The glaas slide is then
Journal of PetroleumTechnology, November 1986
aa fouows.
1. Connate water saturations are usually greater than
20 to 25% PV in a water-wet rock, but less than 10%
PV in an oil-wet rock.
2. Water aaturztion at which oil and water relative pcrmeabtities are equal is generally greater than 50% for
water-wet cores and less than 50% for oil-wet ones.
3. The relative permeabfity to water at floodout is
generally less than 30% in water-wet rocks, but frnm 50
to 100% in oil-wet ones.
These relative permeabtities are based on the oil permeabtity at the comate water saturation. Examples of
relative perrneabfity curves in strongly water-wet snd oilwct corer taken from Craig7 are given in Fig. 6. Note
that Raza et al. 16 state that there are exceptions tn the
gezieral rule that the connate water saturation is higher
for a warcr-wet rock than for an oil-wet one.
Treiber et al 27 pro~sed a secrmd quali@ve technique
for strongly wetted rocks The method comp=es the
oil/water, gas/oil, and gas/water relative permeabilkie.s
and takes advantage of the fact that relative permeability
:E.;E?JF2:EP;:,:EZZ$2:E;
water-wet, the relative perrneab~ky tu oil (the preferentially wetting phaae with respect to the gas) in the gas/oil
relative pcrmeabtity test shordd be a continuation of the
relative permeabdity to the water (the wetting phzae) in
the water/Oil relative pcmzeabil~ test. 76 If significant
differences are observed, the sample is not strongly
water-wet.
An example of the comparison of the relative perr22eabtity curves in a strongly water-wet core taken from
Owens and Archer76 is shown in Fig. 7. The gas/oil
drainsge relative perrneabfity, where the oil ia the stronglywetting fluid, is shown as the dotted Iiues. The water/oil
relative pcrrneabfity, where tbe water is the strmrgly wetdug fluid, ia shown aa the solid lines. Note that the water
relative penneabi3ity, where the wetting fluid saturation
is iricreasing, is a continuation of the oil relative pe2n2ea1253
o
CO
OIL
h
a%
.:
*3
AA
AAA
&
WAT&T
ROCK
(NUGGET SAND]
AA
\GA2
\
\
\
\
wATER
~3
C.L
00
./
OIL-WET
ROCK
[SWINGER ~D1
.0
Ok
1
20
40
60
60
0.1
permeabltity
relationships.
Torpedo
CONNATE
~9. 8Relatiom~~
!urpermeabltity.
WATER SNUR.T,ON % W
Fig. 9CapilIarlmetric
method.
20 cos e
=$(poho-p~hv+),
r
. . . ..
. . (7)
where
r = radius of the capillary tube,
P. = oil demi~,
p ~ = water density,
ho = height of the oil column above the
oil/water interface, and
h~ = height of the water column above the
o-illwater interface.
Eq. 7 can be rearranged to calculate the product of aand
cos 0, which Johansen and Dunning called the dkplacement energy (adhesion tension):.
ED=acos
@= T(poho-pWhJ.
. . . . . . . . . ...(8)
20 Cos 8=
P~=,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...(9)
Tmx
where PT is the displacement capillary pressure, a is the
IFT, O= is tbe apparent contsct nngle, and ris the
radius of the pure through which the nonwetting fluid begins to enter the core. Because the capillsry pressure needed to inject nonwetting fluid is reduced as the pore radius
is increased, rmax is m mfersge of the radii of the largest pores in the core. Note. @it one limitation of this
method is that it examines the wettabfity of only the lsrgest pores. Because Eq. 9 has two unknowns, 0. ~d
rm=, the oofy way to solve for the apparent contact angle is to mske additional assumptions. It is usually
assumed that some fluid exists that wfil completely wet
the core, so cos 8=1, and rmax csn be calculated. This
allows the contact angle, to be computed for other fluid
pairs.
Slobod and Blum~3 proposed two aenriqnantirativewettsbility measurements baaed on the displacement capjlfary pressure, the wettabfity number, and the apparent
contact angle. The wettabfity number is calculated by carving out two dkplacement experiments-first, water by
oil, and second, oil by sir. Eq. 9 for the oillwatcrlrock
system becomes
2U0-W Cos &o.w
P(o-w)r=
TIM.
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . ..(lOb)
rmax
cm O.-.
N==
Cos 6.-0
12.56
D.-OP(O-W)T
. . . . . . . . . . . . ..(11)
uo-w%m
cOs(oo_w)= =
C.-OP[O-W)T
... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., (12)
Oo-wp(a-o)T
Journalof PetroleumTechnolom..November1986
Nuclear
Magnetic
Relaxation.
Brown and Fatr 102and
uthers 103,lW proposed a nuclear magnetic resonance
f,NMR) method for determining the fraction of the core
that is oil-wet vs. water-wet irr a core with fractional nettability. The method rrses the nuclear magnetic thermal
relaxation time for water protons (hydrogen) in poruus
media. To measure the relaxation time, the sample is first
expused to a smmrgmagnetic field, which makes the nuclei
of the hydrogen atoms line up with the field. The core
is then exposed to a much weaker field. The nuclear magnetic relaxation time, which is the time it takes for the
hydrogen nuclei to adjust (relax) to the new field, is meaaured. There are two relaxation times: relaxation of the
component parallel m the field is called thermal relaxation, and relaxation of the component pe errdicrdar to
the field is cabl transverse relaxation. T 05 The thermaf relaxation time is the time used to measure fractiOnSI wettabifity.
For thermal relaxation to occur after the magnetic field
is changed, Oreprutuns rnuat dissipate some of their energy
to random thermal motion of the molecufes. The protons
are only lurwely coupled to their environment, so they require a time on the order of seconds to adjust to the new
magnetic field, which is a verj long time for atomic
proceasca.
The use of nuclear magnetic relaxation times to measure wettabflity ia based on the observation that the surfaces of the porous media can significantly reduce the
measured relaxation time. 102.105When a proton is near
a surface, it cmr bccume temporarily bound to the surfiace,relaxing much faster than in tie bulk fluid. The wettabili
of the surface can influence the relaxation
dine. ? ~-1135 oil-wet surfaces cause ~ SmWer ~~ction
in relaxation time than water-wet surfaces.
Brown and Fatt 102 exmnincd 100% water-saturated
sand packs in which a fraction of the aand grains were
water-wet and the remainder bad been treated with an orgarmchforosilarre tu render them oil-wet. They found a
finear rclatiun between the rafaxation rate and the fraction of oil-wet surface area. f,The relaxation rate is the
inverse of the relaxation time.) The greater the fraction
of oil-wet grairra, the longer the relaxation time, and the
slower the relaxation rate. Krmrar et al. lM measured
relimtion times with 100% water-saturated bead packa
composed of water-wet glass beads and non-water-wet
polymetlryhnethacrylate beads. The relaxation time increased heady as the fmctiun of non-water-wet beads
Dye Adaurption. Holbruok and Bernard lM used the adincreased.
sorption of metbylene blue from an aqueous solution inBrown and Fattlm and Knmar et al. lM applied their
jected into a cure to measure fractional nettability. This
methud only to sandpack and beadpacka. Deveraaux los
method successfully mcaaured the wettabtity of fraction-
1257
saturation seerrra
of the clay
1258
however, that it maybe possible to use supercriticsl drying to avoid these problems. L13
Mixed Wettabfity. At the current time, there is no single nettability test that wifl determine whether a core has
Sslathiels lol mixed wettabiity. It appossible, however, to make this determination by examining the reardta
of (1) a glass slide nettability test, (2) a waterflood of
the native-state core, and (3) several waterflood of
restored-state coma that were aged with different brine
saturations. As discussed in the introductory paper, 1 in
a mixed-wettabdity core, the oil-wet rock surfaces form
continuous paths throughout the large pores, while the
smaller pures remain water-wet. Mined wettabilhy can
occur in a rock if the crnde forms a thick oil-wet layer
on the smface only in those places where it is in dirwt
contact. This can be tested with the glxas slide method,
with half the slide in crude and the other half iu brine.
Quartz or calcite cryatala could also be used to give a surfxce more representative of the reservoir. The core may
have mixed wettabtity if the haffof the slide aged in cru&
forms a thick, oil-wet layer, while the half aged in briue
remains water-wet. If the entire sfide remains water-wet
or becomes oil-wet, the core will probably have a uuiform wettsbdity.
The second measurement to iudicate mixed wettabiMy
is a waterflood of the native-state core. If the core has
mixed wettabilky, oil will be produced down to a very
low ROS as many PVs of water sre injected. Uniformwettabili~ cores wiR generally have a shorter duration
of production andlor a larger ROS. 6,7,114,115Finally, ,a
series of waterflood in restored-state cures cambe used
to confirm rhe mixed wearability of the core. A series of
cores is cleaned, saturated in brine, oilflonded with cmde
to dfierent brine saturations, then aged to restore its original wettabtity. Salathiel fonud that the recuve~ fmm his
restored-state nrixed-wettabdity cores had a maximum at
a pmticuka value of the brine saturation during aging.
When the water aahmmionwas lower than this value, some
of the arnidl pores becsme oil-wet, lowering recoveg.
Conversely, at larger water sahmations, the oil patiways
through the core became discontinuous.
Two other measurements that will sometimes help in
determining whether a core has mixed wettsbifity are imbibkion meaaurementa aud capillary pressure behavior. 3
Spontaneous (free) imbidti,on of both oil snd water h@
been reported for some cures with iiactional or mixed wettabiity. 49-51These corez will have positive diaplacementby-water aud displacement-by-uil ratios. Another indicakx
of mixed wettabtity is a comparison of Oil-displacingbrine capillary pressure measured on native-state plugs
va. meaauremenk on the ssnre plugs after they have been
clca.ned aud rendered water-wet. In some mixed-wet
plugs, the native-state capillary pressure curve wilf cross
over the cleaned curve m the capillary pressure ia increased. 116118Fticr discussion can be found in Ref. 3.
In summary, if the oil forms thick, oil-wet tilms only
on thoac pm-tioui of the glass afide with which it ia iu direct
contac~ if the core can be flooded down to very low oil
saturation, yet still produce small smouuta of ofi tid if
the oil recove~ from a rcatored-state core has a nraximum at a sp.%itlc brine saturation during its aging period, then the core Iiiely haa mixed wettabil@. ImbMion
Journalof PetroleumTechnology,November1986
and capillssy pressure mesanrementa can also help determine whether a core-has mixed nettability.
Conclusions
1. Three quantitative wettabdity measurements me in
use today contact angle, the Amott method, and the
USBM me~od. The contact angle measures the wettabflity of crude and brine on a polished mineral surface.
It is the best method to use when pure fluids and artificial
cores are used. It is also used to examine the effects on
nettability of experimental conditions, such m pressure,
temperature, and brine chemistry. The USBM and Amott
methods measure the average wettabil~ of core. They
are superior to the contact-angle method when the wettabflity of native- or restored-state core is measured. They
also must be used to determine whether a core has been
cleaned completely. The USBM method appsass to be superior to the Amott method, which is insensitive mar neutral wettab~lty. A modification of the USBM method,
developed by Sharnra and Wunderlich, 57 allows the calculation of both the USBM and Amott nettability indices.
2. A Iarge.number of qualitative wettabfity measurement methods are available. The imbibition method is the
most widely used because it is fast, does not require any
complicated equipment, mrd gives RJJidea of the average
wettabfi~ of the core. Tbe microscope examination
method is otlen used.in flow visualization studies. Finally, wettabilhy measurement methods based on relative
permeabdity curves are often used when these data are
available.
3. Two methods have been developed to measure the
fractional wettabtity: the NMR method and the dye adsorption method. Neither method is widely used today.
4. There is no mefhod m determine
whefher
a core has
mixed wettabfity. However, it appesra that it maybe pGssible to make such determination by examining the results of a glass slide nettability test, a waterflood of the
native-state core with many PVs of water, several waterflood of restored-state cores that were aged with different brine saturations, and imbibition and capillary pressure
measurements.
Nomenclature
,4~ = area under the oil-drive centrifigrd
capillary pressure curve, USBM method
,42 = area under the brine~tike cenfrifigal
capillary pressure curve, USBM method
ED = displacement energy (adhesion tension)
g = acceleration of gravity
ho = height of the oil column above the
Oil/water inter@ce
h. = height of the water column above the
Oil/water interface
I = Amots-Harvey relative displacement index
~ = initi~ imbibition ~k of ~ core just after it
is submerged in a fluid
fir, = initial imbibition rate of a core after it is
cleaned and rendered strongly water-wet
N = wettabfity number, Eq. 11
P, = capilla~ pressure
r = capillary tube ra~us
Journal of Petroleum Technology, November 1986
vWSp=
volume
of water
imbibition,
displaced
of oil,
Amen
by spontaneous
method
method
W = USBM nettability index
apparent
advsncing
sir-oil
oil-water
receding
T = fhmahold
Acknow[sdgments
I am grateful to Jeff Meyers for his many helpful suggestions and comments. I also thank the management of
Cormco Inc. for permission to publish this paper.
10. DuUien, F.A.L.: Porous Media: Fluid Tmnspon and Pow SrrucUtre, Academic Press, New York Cify (1979).
11. Hjelmekmd,O. and Torsae+er,0.: LWeOabiliW,
the Key to Proper
Lat%matov Waterfbdhg Expminurds, Intl. Energy Agency
Workshop on Enhanced 011Recovery, BarOesviUeEnergy T.%hmlosy cater (April24, 1980). CONF-S03$140, U.S. DOE Feb.
1981) 1-3A.
12. kmescu.e, E. and Maini, B.B.: A Review of Laboralov TechrnqUEX
for Measuring WeftabilifYof Petroleum Rcser.wir Recks,,,
Pefrolenm Recovery Jnst., rqmt 1983-3, CaJgary (Oct. 1983).
13. Marsden, S. S.: -Wetiabiliw-Im Measurement and Application
to Waterfkwding, J. Jap. Assoc. Pet. Tech. (Ian. 1965)30, No.
1, 1-10,
14. Marsdm, S.S,: GWettabiliiyThe Elusive Key to Wawflccding.
Pezroleum Engbwer (April 1965) 37, No. 4, 82-87.
M. E., and Domkdsoo, E. C.: Rela15. McGhee, J.W., Crder,
tive Wetting J@erties of Crude Oils in Berea Sandstone, BartIesville Energy Technolo~ Cm.ter, report BETCEG-7819, U.S.
DOE (Jan. 1979).
16, J&a, S.H., Treiber, L.E., ad Archer, D. L.: Wettab&ty Of
Reservoir R.xks and Its Evaluation, Producers Monthly (April
1968) 32, No. 4, 2-7.
17. Oonaldsm, E.C. et al,: C.Equipmentand Prxedures for Fluid
Flow and WettabiJ@ Tests of Geological Materials,, Bartksville
Enerps Technology Center, rqort DOE/BETCllC 79)5, U.S.
DOE @iS.y 1980),
18. Donaldson, E. C.: ;Oil-Water-Rock Nettability Measurement,
Pmt.. American Chemical Sac., Div. of Pefroleum Chemistry
(Wch 29-Auril
. 3. 1981). 26.. No. 1. 110-22.
19. Johnson,R.E. and Deffre, R, H.: .&Weoabilhy and Confact Angles, suofaceand Co#oidScience, E. Matijevic (cd.), WiJeYJn-
24. M.Caffery, F.G. and Mngan, N.: .Comact A@. and fnterfacial Tension Studies of wc Eydmcakon-WmerS.iid Systems,
J. c& Pet. Tech, (July-Sept. 1970) 9, No. 3.185-96.
2s. McCaffe.IY,F. G.: .Measwemetx gf Inteifacid Tensions and Con-
mu Anglesat High T~mNie
and Pressure,J. C& Pet. Tech.
(]ldy-xt. 1972) 11, No. 3, 26-32.
26. Leach, R.O. m al.: A Laboratory and Field Study of Weuability Adjuslmerdin WaterOccding,,, JPT(Feb. 1962)205-IZ Trans..
AU4E. 22S.
27. Treiber, L. E., Archer, D. L., and Owens, W. W.: LAL+boratoIYKvaluafim of the We@dliw of Fti Od FmducrngR-oirs,
SPEI (Dec. 1972) 531-40, ,,
28. BarteO, F.E. and Niederbauser, D. O.: Fdm Forming Constimmd.sof Crude Peuoleum OiJs, Fwwkmenral Research on Occurrence and Recovery of Pefrofeum, API, New York City
(1946-W47J 57-80.
29. Dcdd, C. G.: ,The Rheologicd Behavior of FM at Crude
Petroleum-Water Lxerfaces; J. Phys, C%em.(1903) 64,344-50.
30. Reisbwg, J. and Dmcher, T. M.: %derfacird Phenomenain Cmde
Oil-Wafer Systems, Producers Monthly (Nov. 1956)21, No. 1,
43-50.
31, Morrow, N.R.: ,Physics and Thermodynamics of Capillary Action in Porous hfedia,, Jnd. Eng. Chem. (June 1970) 62, No. 6,
presenfed at fhe.1985 SPE Annwd Technical Coif&ence and Exhibition, la.s Vegas, Sept. 22-25.
,
36. Cuiec, L.E. et aL: Recomcn&tiom for the Dewminatim of
the WettaMhy of a Swimen of Reservoir Rwk, Rev. Insf.
Fmc. duP&03e fNov. -Dec. 1978) 33, No. 6,907-14. E@sh
translation available from Associated Technical Servicm; tramlation no. 33H159F.
37. Bmeau, D.F. and Ckunpin, R.L.: A Surfacfant System for the
Oif Wet Sandstone of tie North Burbank Utit, JPTiMay 1977)
501-06.
38. Tnmnham,J.C. and Clampitf, R.L.: Determination of Oti SaNration A!ier Watertlc.cdi.g in a!i Oil-Wet Reservoir-The North
Burbank Unit, Tract 97 Project,>, JPT (May 1977) 491-5CQ.
39. Cuiec, L.E.: RcckiCmde 011Jnteracdons and Weoabilify An
Aftempt to Understand Their Infemelation, paper SPE 13211
presented at the 1984 SPE AnnuaJTechnical Conference and Exhibition, Housfon, Sept. 16-19.
40. Morrow, N.R., Lim, H.T., and Ward, 1.S.: Effect of CmdeOfi-fnducedWermbiifYChanges on Oil R.ecovew,SPEFE&eb.
1986) s9-103.
41. McCaffery,F. G.: Tim Effect of Weffabilityon Relative Penn+
ability and Imbibition in Porous Media, PhD fbesi.s,U. of Calgary, Calgaly, Albafa (1973).
42. Mdmse, J.C.: Wetfab!lity as Relafed to Capihy Action in
Porous Media., SPEJ (Sept. 1965J 259-71.
43. Mmrmv, N.R. and MwIg.an,N.: WettabChy and CapiIIariWin
Porous Media, Peuolemn Recovery Research Just., Calgary,
report RR-7 (Jan. 1971).
44. Morrow. N. R.: CaDiJkuv Pressure Correlations for Uniformly
Wetted Porous fvfti~, J.CaJI.Per. Tech. (OcL-Dec. 1976) U,
No. 4, 49-69.
45. Morrow, N.R. and Mccaffew, F.G.: Displacement Studies in
UniformfyWetted Porous Media, WeIdn,$ Spreadin&andAdhesio., G.F. Pad&y (cd.), Academic FESS, New York CiV (1978)
289-319.
46. Le.veren, M. C.: .Capi21myBehavior in Porous Solds, TrCULS,
AJME (1941) 142, 152-69.
47. Hassler, G.L. and Bnumer, E.: Measurement of C.#la.ry EYessure in small Core Sam@, 9, Tmx.r., AJME (1P43J160.114-23.
48. Slotcd, R.L,, Chamters, A., and Prehn, W. L.: WI,, of Centrifuge for Determining CommteWater, Residual Oil, and Capillay Pressure Curves of .%akl core Samples, Trans., AIME
(1951) 192, 127-34.
49. Burkhardt,J.A., Ward, M.B., and McLan, RH.: <EffectOfGm&
Surfacing and Mud Fikrate Flushing on Reliability of Core&mlysis Conducted on Fresh Cores, paper SPE 1139G presented at
fhe 195S SPE Annuaf FalJ Meefing, Houston, Oct. 5-8.
50. Mohamy, K.K. and SaJter, S.J.: ,Muhiphax Fiow in Porous Meam,
OJ Mobd~ou,
Tmmvm DisWrsicm, and Weoabili-
51.
52.
53.
34.
55.
32-56,
32. Eick, J.D., Gw6, R,J., and Neumann, A.W.; Thermodynam-
ics of Confact A@K U. Rough Solid Surfaces,,. J. Colloid Inte$ace Sci fNov, 1975) 53, No. 2, 235-48.
33. WrignEX,O,R, and Leach, R. O.: Tmprcwing 0,1 Displacement
Efflciemy by WeltabfliV Adjustment, JPT(AprO 1959)65-72
Trans. , AIME, 216..
34. Cuiec, L. E.: Res.foration of the Natural State of Core .%mplm,
PSFUSPE 5634 presenfed at the 1975SPE .&mud TechnicaJConference and Exhibtion, Dallas, Sept. 28-Ott. 1.
1260
56.
57.
5S.
Mechanisms of Alkaline Flocdine., Surface Phenomena in EnJkancedOil Recovery, D.O. Shah ?~.), Pienum Press, New York
City (1981) 249-91.
61. Michads, A.S. and Tinmdn.s, RS.: Chromatogiaphic TmnsFOrl of Reverse-Weting Agents ad Its Effect m OiJ Displacement in Porous Media, Trans., AJME (1960) 219, 15W37.
62, Michaels, A.S,, Smncell, A., and Por7er, M.C.: ,Effect of Chm
nmtographic Transpml i. Hexylandne on Displacement of Oil by
Water i Poro.s Media,,> SPEJ (Sept. 1964) 231-3% Tram.,
AJME, 231.
-,
-----
.,
84. Gatenby, W.A. and Marsden, SS.: Some Wenabilify Characteristics of Synthetic Porous Media,- Pmduccm Monthly fNov,
1957) 22, No. 1, 5-12,
85. D.rmine. H.N. and Johamen. R,T.: Ca~iIlarimetric Methcd fm
Mca.sur&.nt
of Crude Oil Wetting l%n~ency,,, Per. Enz. (July
19S8) 30, No. 7, fi26-B27.
86, Johansen,R.T. and Dunning H, N.: Relative Wef6ng Tendencies of Crude Oil by fbe Capillmhnetric Method,,, Pmducem
Momhly (Sept. 1959}23, No. 11, 2%22.
S7. Johanse, R.T. and Dunning, H.N. :. Relative Wetting Tendencies of Crude 0,1s by Capilkirimetric Method,,> U.S. Dept. of
the Imerior, USBM, report Rf 5752 (1961).
88. Barfell, F.E. and Oscerhof, H.].: ..Determimdon of the Wettabtily of a Sofid by a Liquid Relatim of Adhesion Tensicmto Stability of Color Varnish and Lacquer Systems,>, Ind. Enz, C&m,
(1927) 19, 1277-80.
89. Bartell, F.E. and Miller, F. L.: .Degree of Wetdng of Silica by
Crude Petroleum 0,1s,, [rid. Ens. Chem. (July 1928) 20, No.
7.738-42.
90. %ner, F.C., Odd, C.O., and BwL4J,F.E.: Wkpkmement Fmssums for Petroleum Od-Water-8iJicaSystems, Oil& GasJ. (Nov.
12, 1942) 41, No. 27, 199-208.
91. Benner, F. C., Dcdd, C. G,, and Bartell, FE.: &EvailMiOn of EffecfiveDiwkmment Re.ssuresfor Petroleum Oi-Water-Silica Systems,,, F&dmneml Reteach on Occurrence and Recover3-of
Pefroleum, API, New York City (1943) 05-93.
92, SinghaJ,A.K. and Dramh.k, P. M.: Nettability Comrol of Glass
Beads, Cab. J. Chem. E.g. (Feb. 1975) 53, 3-8.
93. Slobod, R.L. and Blwn, H.A. : <Methodfor Demmining Nettability of Resewoir Rocks, Tram., AIME (1952) 195, 1-4.
94. Warren, J.E. and CaJhoun, J.C.: CASmdy of Watedlmd Efficiency in Oil-Wet Systems,,, JPT (Feb. 1955) 2-2% Trms.,
ASME, 204.
95. Kinney, P.T. and Nielsen, R.F.: <TheRole of Wet!abilhy in Oil
RecoveV; Producers Monrhly (Jan. 1950) 14, No. 3, 29-35.
96. Kinney, P.T. md Nielsen, R.F.: WettabiJi~ in Oil Recovery, >v
Worfd Oil (March 1951) 132, No. 4, 145-54,
97. Stahl, C.D. and Nielsen, R.F.: .Residual Water and Residua) Oil
By Capillary Pressure Technicpes,,, Producers Jfmubly (Jan.
1950) 14, No. 3, 19-22.
98. Kinney, P.T., Killins, C. R., and Nielsen, R. F.: Worn. ApplicaSands,,,
60., of C@@ Pressure Measurements0 P,wklli.
Bull., TedmicaJ Cofermce o Petroleum Prodmtio, Mineral
Jndu.sfdesExperiment Station, PennsylvaniaState U. (Oct. 24-26,
1951) No. 59, 52-61.
99. Graham, J.W.: Reverse-Wetd.g Logging,,, Trans., AIME
(1958) 233, 304-09.
100. Holmes. M. and TiDDie.D.B.: Comparison Between Loz and
Capillti Bessure Dafato Estimate Rsemoir Wetting, ~aper
SPE 6856 presemed at the 1977 SPE .kmual TechnicaJ Conference and Exhibifior,> Denver, Oct. 9-12.
10L Salathiel, R. A.: ,.Oil Recovery by Surface Film Drainage in
Mixed-Wetfabilhy RCC!S,9,JPT (Oct. 1973) 1216-2% Trans.,
. ASME, 25S.
102
Brow, R.J.S. and Fan, L: .Measnremems of Fmcdoml Werebility of Oilfield Rocks by tie Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation
M@A@SSTram. , A3ME (1956) 207, 262-&.
103, Devereaux, O. F.: .Effect of Cm& Oil o the NMR Relaxation
of Water Rotors in .%ndstonc,,, Nature (Au8. 5, 1967) 215,
614-15.
104. Kumar, J., Fa.tf,L, and Samf, D. N.: Nuclear Magnetic Reluxio Time of Water in a Porous Medium wifh HeterogeneousSurface Wel!nbdily, J, Appl. Physics (Sept. 1969) 40, No. 10,
4165-71.
105. Brown, R.J.S, and Ganwn, B.W.: Nuclear Magnetism Lo8Sing, Trans., ASME (1960) 219, 199-207.
106. JJolbmok, O.C, and Bernard, G, C,: Detmminatio of WeiW
biJity by Dye Adsorption, Trans., AJME (1958) 233, 261-64.
107. Brown, W.O.: The Mobiliy of Connate Water During a Watertlccd,,> JPT (July 1957) 190-95; Trans., AIME, 210,
Jones, S.C.: ,,Some Surprises in fhe Tmnsgmrtof Miscible Fluids
in he Freseceof a Second JnmdsciblePhase,,, SPEJ fFeb. 1985)
101-12.
109. P.aimondi, P., Torcaso, M., and Henderson, J.: sThe Effect of
Jnfemtitial Wafm on tie Mixing of Hydrocarbons During a M&
cible Dkplacement prccess, Mineral IA.mies Erpen.men?SIotion CircularNo. 61, PennsylvaniaSfafeU., University park (Oct.
23-25, 1961) 1-34.
1261
110 .%her, SJ. and Mohanly, K.K.: MuMphasz FIOWiu Porous Me-
111
1262
degrees
F
psi
Ofig(nal !mnuscrlpl
Joum+of