CEMENTING TO ACHIEVE ZONE ISOLATION
IN DISPOSAL WELLS
Charles George
Bruce Thomas
Halliburton Services
Duncan, Oklahoma
ABSTRACT
Zone isolation is a key element in the success of a disposal well
and is a major criterion by which the success of a disposal well is
determined.
Subject paper will present state of the art cementing techniques
developed for effective zone isolation for waste disposal.
Cenenting/sealing compositions presented will include:
1. Gelling preflush that provides a "prop" against which the cement
can be pumped, thus helping avoid lost cement returns.
2, Epoxy sealant used on new completions.
3° Durability enhancers such as resins, pozzolans and latex cement.
4. Corrosion resistant epoxy designed to assist in installation of
new casing inside old, corroded casing.
Job designs for long string and intermediate completions will be
presented and discussed, Other topics include cementing tools and
water/cement ratios.
Field results from sample jobs will be presented.
ANTRODUCTION
Cementing the casing of a waste disposal well requires the same
basic todls, materials and techniques used to perform primary oilvell
cementing. The oilwell primary cementing process is explained in the
"General" section.
GENERAL
Regardless of the purpose for which a well is drilled ~-- oil,
gas, disposal, injection, geothermal, water or storage --- the well
7I oo
usually requires cementing. “Cementing" (also referred to as "primary
cementing") is accomplished by placement (usually pumping) of a slurry,
usually made up of a cementitious material and water, into the annulus
between the outside of the casing and the wall of the hole.
Primary cementing is performed for several reasons.
1, Protection of casing from corrosion from the outside.
2. Bonding the casing to the wellbore for support.
3. For zone isolation, e.g, to prevent contamination of fresh water
zones by hydrocarbons or salt water.
4, To seal lost circulation or thief zones.
5. Protect casing from shock loads experienced in additional
drilling.
Squeeze cementing" is usually remedial in nature; this is the
process of using hydraulic force to squeeze cement slurry into
formation voids or against porous zones. A squeeze is usually
performed after the producing zone is reached, but may be applied
during drilling to stop lost circulation.
Squeeze cementing is performed to help accomplish many objectives.
1, Control excess water.
2. Repair casing leaks.
3. Segregate a hydrocarbon-producing zone from those producing other
fluids.
4, Seal off thief zones or lost circulation zones.
5. Prevent fluid migration from abandoned zones or wells.
6. Restore integrity to wellbores where casing has corroded.
7. Fill voids in the primary cement job.
|
PRIMARY CEMENTING
Techniques
The most used technique for primary cementing is the single stage,
two plug method, which is illustrated in Fig. 1. Required surface and
subsurface equipment to perform a primary cementing job (single stage,
two-plug) is also shown. |
three or four-stage cementing procedures, Multiple stages reduce the
hydrostatic pressure created by a cement column, thus reducing the
risks of breaking a weak zone and losing circulation. Multiple stage
cementing can be more economical in that 1t 1s not necessary to cement
the string all the way back to the surface. Multiple stage cementing
is alsa inporcant for use in wells where two or more zones are
separated by long intervals.
‘The single stage primary cementing procedure illustrated is
normally accomplished by mixing and continuously pumping one batch of
cement down the casing between two rubber plugs. The plugs (B and €)
are equipped with wiping fins to help prevent contamination of the
cement by mud, and to help clean the interior of the pipe. when the
78FIG. 1
PRIMARY
CEMENTING PROCEDURE
9
Job Finishedtop wiper plug seats, the cement glurry has been placed in the annulue
and the displacement is complete.
Floating and Guiding Equipment
Field-proven casing guiding equipment is available to help the
operator conduct an effective primary cement job.
L
Guide shoes are located on the bottom of the first joint of casing
to direct the string away from ledges and obstructions such as
shoulders, to minimize sidewall caving while running the casing to
the botcom. The shoes pictured in Fig, 2 are equipped with
concrete noses that resist abtasion and high impacts, but wiil
drill out easily. Some guide shoes have float valves to help
prevent slurry back-flow (Fig. 3).
Formation packer shoes may be installed on the first joint of
casing vhen completing a well vhere low pressure formations must
be protected against cement contamination. With the formation
packer shoe, the operator can set pipe above the pay zone and pack
Off the open hole below (Fig. 4).
Floating equipment is used to reduce the effective weight of the
casing string, which must be supported by the drilling rig. Weight
reduction is effected by prevention of uncontrolled entry of fluid into
the pipe. Float valves in the devices also help prevent slurry
back-flow after cenenting.
ay
Float collers (Fig. 5), used alone or combined with a float shoe
(Pig. 3) (a) make the casing more buoyant, (b) lighten the load on
surface equipment, and (c) help prevent slurry back-flow,
Down-jet float shoes (Fig. 6) jet fluid downward to tenove
cuttings and filter cake, and create turbulence that allows better
cement distribution,
Gasing Accessories
Mud cake removal, casing centralization and protection of weak
zones are important to the success of any primary cementing job.
Wall cleaners (Pigs. 7 and 8) remove mud cake from the wellbore
wall by reciprocal or rotational movement.
Gement baskets (Fig. 9) help (a) protect weak and porous zones,
an@ (b) support the cement column while the cenent takes an
initial set.
Gentralizers (Fig. 10) position casing in the center of the
wellbore to help prevent channeling and provide a more uniform
thickness of the cement sheath.
ixing Equipment
Most wells are cemented with cements brought to the site in bulk
form and mixed and pumped in a continuous operation. Typically, a
80FIG.2
REGULAR GUIDE
‘SHOE
FIG. 5
FLOAT COLLAR,
Fig. 4
FORMATION PACKER
‘SHOE
FIG. 3
FLOAT SHOE
Fic. 6
DOWN JET
FLOAT-SHOE,FIG. 7
CABLE TYPE WALL
CLEANER (CASING SIZE) L<
HINGED BODY
ROTATING CASING
WALL SCRATCHER,
FIG. 10 |
CASING CENTRALIZER
jrecirculating cement mixer (Fig. 1) is used in conjunction with a
two-compartment mixing tub equipped with a turbine agitator in each
compartment. The mixer combines water and recirculated slurry with dry
cement. These components are partially mixed, then discharged into the
first compartment of the tub.
A cenent wheel on the throttling valve of the mixer controls entry
of dry cement. Water rate is controlled by the mixing manifold on top
of the mixing tub.
Im the first compartment of the tub, the slurry is blended by an
agitator, recirculated by a centrifugal pump, and weighted by a
densometer. Any weight variations are corrected automatically. When
the first compartment is full, the slurry flows over a weir into the
second compartment. Flow over the weir helps remove air from the
slurry.
‘The second compartment contains some slurry at the desired weight.
‘The combined slurries (From the two tubs) are blended further by the
agitator in the second compartment to help create a uniform mixture.
‘This blended slurry is pumped downhole,
Preflush
A gelling preflush can je used to displace water and form a thick
leading edge for the cement.” Where the formation contains zones of
brine or fresh water Flow or extremely weak, saturated sands, the
gelling preflush forms a "prop" by gelling on contact with the
formation brine (or fresh water treated with calcium chloride to form
artificial brine). The viscous gel, which is permanent, serves to help
plug channels and formation vugs to help prevent lost circulation while
the cement sets.
Cements and Additives
Curing tines vary widely depending on the environment of the vel,
Downhole temperatures in the Permafrost zone are below freezing, and
sone steau wells are above 700°.
Cement classes G and H, modified by the additives listed below,
ate the most commonly used for well cementing. Some 50 additives are
available in these classes.
1, Accelerators
2. Lightweight additives
3. Heavyweight additives
4. Retarders
5. Lost circulation control agents
Friction reducers
Specialty naterials
Portland cements can be readily adapted for use in wells where the
effluent is categorized as organic, weak organic acid, sewage waste,
83ferric chloride, and chemically treated effluents having a pil of 6 or
more. Durability of portland cement can be enhanced by the addition of
pozzolan material. The highly reactive silica reacts with the lime
liberated during the hydration of the cement, resulting in a more dense
set. This reaction reduces the amount of line present to react with
the acid effluent.
Resistance to attack on the set cement can be improved by
decreasing the water-cement ratio of the slurry. Water reduction is
possible when a dispersant or viscosity reducer is added to keep the
slurry pumpable, The chemical effect of the water reduction is that
the nornal calcium silicatgs are present in a dense set cement that has
high compressive etrength.
Latex is an additive that improves the stability of cement ia the
presence of various effluents. This material increases the cost of the
slurry byt may offer substantially better resistance to some waste
systems.
Gementing Disposal Wells.
Zone isolation in disposal wells is critical. Injected fluids
must be kept away from fresh water supplies and must not be permitted
to communicate to the surface. Gommon practice includes setting
surface casing sufficiently below the lower limits of fresh water
aquifers. The injection casing is then cemented in place with chemical
resistant cements or epoxy sealants depending on the fluid to be
injected.
Use of Epoxy Sealants
Corrosion-resistant epoxy sealants can be used in combination with
portland and other additives to repair damaged casing and in new
completions.
In old wells where the casing is corroded, a new casing of smaller
dianter can be installed to total depth and sealed to the old casing
with a multiple stage cementing tool controlling the epoxy sealant.
Examples of this type disposal well repair have been back in use for
many years after remedial cementing with epoxy sealant. Some operators
follow the epoxy (first stage) with latex cement (second stage) to
combat the corrosive effects of the chemicals being injected.
Combination of epoxies and cements are used to reduce cost.
New completions can also benefit from use of epoxy sealants. A
new disposal well in south Texas was cemented in two stages, with epoxy
sealant (first stage) followed by portland cement (second stage). A
multiple stage tool was used for control of displacement. Details of
the job design and execution are shown below.
Well Data
4460 ft
12 L/4-in.
84Casing Size 9 5/8~in.
Surface Casing 13 3/8-in.
Mud Weight 9.5. W/gal
BEST 150°F
Genenting tool depth 3617 fe
Calculations Caliper log + 15% excess
Materials
Spacer 4000 gal diesel
39 gal gelling agent
17,355 1b fine silica flour
Epoxy Sealant 3636 gal unfilled epoxy sealant
42,000 lb silica flour filler
Portland Cement 600 sacks lightweight cement
Water ratio ~ 7.7 gal/sack
Slurry weight ~ 13.6 1b/gal
Slurry volume - 1.54 cu ft/sack
400 sacks 50/50 pozzolanie cement
Water ratio ~ 5.75 gal/sack
Slurry weight 14.2 1b/gal
Slurry volume ~ 1.26 cu ft/sack
500 sacks Class H + 5% salt
Water ratio ~ 5.2 gal/sack
Slurry weight ~ 15.7 Ib/gal
Slurry volume ~ 1.19 cu ft/sack
Procedure
10.
ie
Pump 500 gal diesel
Pump 840 gal spacer (9.8 1b/gal, gelled)
Pump 5550 gal epoxy sealant (13.2 1b/gal)
Load shutoff plug
Pump 3360 gal spacer
Pump 10,668 gal md (9.6 1b/gal)
Drop free falling plug and load closing plug
Open cementing tool and start circulation, (Check epoxy
sealant for hard set @ 118°F in laboratory.)
Begin mixing Portland cement ~ 6912 gel lightweight cement,
3770 gal pozzolanic cenent, 3748 gal Class H cement + 5% salt
Drop multiple stage cementer closing plug
Start displacement ~ 11,634 gal mud
Gementing with Microspheres
High strength microspheres (HSMS) added to portland cement
slurries lighten the weight of the slurries with only minor reductions
in compressive strength. In cementing wells with weak or highly
permeable zones, a lightweight slurry can help the operator avoid lose
of circulation caused by the hydrostatic pressure of the cement column,
HSMS additive is essentially air entrapped in hollow beads composed
85mostly of silicon and aluminum, Addition of HSMS to slurries can
reduce density to less than the density of the mixing vater alone, with
strength suffjcient for use over a wide range of pressures and
temperatures,
‘The effective particle density of USMS ranges from 5,25 1bm/gal at
atmospheric pressure to 8.33 Iba/gal at 6000 psi. This predictable and
Limited density increase with increasing pressure 1s the characteristic
that makes USMS suitable for use in high pressure applications. Low
vater absorbency and low particle density result in greatly reduced
water/cenent ratios compared to low-density admixtures. As a result,
the strength of a 10 lbm/gal HSMS slurry is roughly equal to that of a
13 Ibm/gal, slurry prepared from portland cement and other lightweight
additives.
The example job described below iliustrates the versatility of the
SMS method of creating lightweight slurries. Though the job was a
remedial action taken to repair a suspected leak in the primary cement,
a similar slurry could be used for new completions.
Some Florida cities began in the 1970's to dispose of municipal
wastes by injection into a very permeable zone at about 2500 ft.
Injection rates may exceed 15 million gal/day. Completion practices of
the day included tacking the intermediate casing at the bottom and
leaving en open annulus to the bottom of the surface casing, which is
30 in. pipe cemented from 1100 ft all the way back to the surface (Fig.
11). ‘The annulus is open from the tacked bottom at TD all the way to
che bottom of the intermediate string at 1100 ft. Tn this well, the
casing hardware would not permit use of the conventional "top-out"
method of displacement, so the "bullhead" (pumped down the annulus)
approach was the only option (Pig. 12).
Well Daca
T, Surface pipe cemented in original completion, not a factor
2. Injection string: 24 in. at 2500 fe (TD), cemented to 2230 ft |
3. nist: 80°F |
4) annular fluid: Fresh water |
5. Hole diameter: 34 in. (average) \
6. Lost circulation zone at 2230 ft |
i
Job Criteria
T, Bullhead down annulus and £111 to surface.
2. Maintain annular Pw of less than 60 psi to stay under collapse
rating of 24 in, injection string.
3. Maintain slurry hydrostatic at or below 1000 psi bottomhole
|. pressure to avoid breaking down weak zone at 2230 ft.
4. Slurry must have sufficient pump time for wide variation in
pump rates, yet have moderate thixotropic properties and good
bridging properties.
Slurry Placement
T, Lead slurry: 2230 ft to 2130 £t
2, HSMS slurry: 2130 £t to surface
86ABUTS SWISH ‘NLLNSWS TWIdaW3Y
40 NOILIGGY HaL4¥ 3HOJ38 NOLLIGNOS T13M
zb"Old tod
‘aL.00s2
ov WHIOKO
= 0822 OL
yove Gav
ovze
auans on
Elz
.06@2 AV 5NOZ
NOUWINOHID 1507
aovauns o1
Nado ST7NNNY
‘SNISvO
‘BLWIGSNUSINI 72
zou
2011 OL GALNaW30
Sed BOWAUNSProcedure
T, Pump 4000 gal bentonite/water spacer.
2. Pump 98 sk lead slurry consisting of cenent, 25% gel, 10 Ib/sk
modified gypsum, 1/4 1b/sk cellophane flakes, and 1% calcium
chloride, Lead slurry tagged with 10 me Au-198, Slurry prop-
erties:
Weight 11.9 1b/gal
Yield 3.22 cu ft/sk |
Water 19 gal/sk i
Punp tine 7 br, 45 min
Pump 500 sk HSMS slurry consisting of cement, 217 1b/sk HSMS,
9.4 1b/sk modified gypsum, and 6% calcium chloride, Slurry
properties:
weight 8.0 1b/gal surface |
8.5 1b/gal at total depth |
Yield 10,33 eu ft/sk at surface
9.68 cu ft/sk at total depth
Water 33.85 gal/sk
Puap time 10 br, 40 min at 80°F BRST
Transition time 1 hr, 28 min
Special Equipment
rupture disks certified at 57 psi to prevent exceeding maxi~
mum Py of 60 psi
Well transducer/recorder for accurate pressure control from
0-100 pai,
3. Magnetic flowmeter for accurate pumped volume measurement
Special Procedures
ee iGe to the High volune of USMS used in the slurry, the dry
blend was mixed in three passes at the bulk plant, hauled to
the wellsite, blown into a transfer bin on location, then
blown into the storage bins for the job.
Cement was mixed with a recirculating cement mixer, trans
ferred to a blender, and pumped downhole with a conventional
cementing unit.
3. A gemma tool was run in the 24 in, casing to monitor the
progress of the lead cement throughout the procedure.
Following the above procedures, the operator successfully cemented the
disposal vell without breaking down the weak formation at 2230 ft.
Well was returned to injection.
Conclusions |
Disposal wells can be cemented using essentially the sane mater |
tals, tools, equipment and procedures used on oil and gas wells.
Two special materials, epoxy sealant and HSMS additive, have 2
special application in weak formations storing corrosive
effluents.
3. Attention to quality control is as important on disposal wells as
on petroleum wells.
q 88Acknowledgements
‘The authors thank the management of Halliburton Services for permission
to present this paper. Special thanks to Lynn Onan of the Halliburton
Services Research Center Cementing Section for his input.
References
Te
George, Charles and Faul, Ronald, "Cementing Techniques for Sol
tion Mining Wells and Salt Storage Domes: The State of the Art,"
presented at the Solution Mining of Salts and Brines Symposium,
New York, February 25-26, 1985.
Garvin, Tom and Creel, Prentice, "Foaned Cement Restores Wellbore
Integrity In Old Wells," Oi1 and Gas Journal, August 20, 1984.
Ostroot, G. W, and Donaldson, A. L., "Sub-Surace Disposal of
Acidic Bffiuents," presented at the Evangeline Section Regional
Meeting of SPE of AIME, Lafayette, La., November 9-10, 1970.
Slagle, K. A. and Stogner, J. M., " Techniques of Disposing Indus-
trial Wastes in Deep Wells", presented at the National Pollution
Control Exposition and Conference, Houston, Texas, April 3-5,
1968,
Cole, R. C. and Borchardt, J. K., "Optimum Zone Isolation and
Injectivity in Corrosive Environments", Drilling Magazine, April,
1985.
Harms, W. M. and Sutton, D. L., "ULtralow-Deneity Cementing Oper-
ations", SPE 9597, presented at the 1981 SPE Middle East Oil
Technical Conference held in Manama, Bahrain, March 9-12, 1981.