Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy Consumption During Impact Cutting of Canola Stalk As A Function of Moisture Content and Cutting Height
Energy Consumption During Impact Cutting of Canola Stalk As A Function of Moisture Content and Cutting Height
KEYWORDS
Cutting energy;
Canola stalk;
Cutting height;
Moisture content;
Impact cutting
Abstract This study surveys the needed energy for cutting canola stems in different levels of
cutting height and moisture content. The canola was harvested from the experimental farm in
Gorgan, Iran. Test device fabricated and then calibrated. The device works on the principle of conservation of energy. The tests were repeated 15 times for any level of moisture content and cutting
height and they were analyzed using split plot design. The results showed the effect of height and
moisture content on cutting energy is signicant (P < 1%), but their interaction is not signicant.
The highest cutting energy was 1.1 kJ in 25.5 (w.b.%) moisture content and 10 cm cutting height.
Also the minimum cutting energy was 0.76 kJ in 11.6 (w.b.%) moisture content and 30 cm cutting
height. Blade velocity was 2.64 m/s in cutting moment.
2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
Introduction
Canola plant produces a main stem and many lateral branches
will be divaricated from it. At the end of winter, rst main stem
extends and after blooming the main stem, lateral branches
begins extending. The branching depends on environment, variety, plant nutrition, farming techniques, etc. Stem height varies
from 50 to 200 cm in different varieties (Appelquist and Ohlson,
1972). Thus, given that there are some lateral branches in cut
place by blade, needed energy will vary for cutting.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +98 1714426942.
E-mail address: azadbakht@gau.ac.ir (M. Azadbakht).
Peer review under responsibility of King Saud University.
1658-077X 2013 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2013.10.002
148
M. Azadbakht et al.
Nomenclature
w.b.
D12
DT
DVg
M
g
h1
h2
wet basis, %
energy variance, J
kinesthetic energy variance, J
potential energy variance, J
mass of blade and arm, kg
gravity, ms2
situation of blade before cutting, cm
difference between h1 and h3, cm
h3
R
E
a1
a2
ho
Figure 1
Releasing state.
Energy consumption during impact cutting of canola stalk as a function of moisture content and cutting height
149
ho 1:038a1 2:562
where,
ho = maximum angular upswing deection without cutting
(); and
a1 = initial angular deection of swinging arm ().
Principle of operation
Figure 2
Impact state.
D12 DT Vg
After impact, the situation of blade with considering of friction, will be in place 2. Kinesthetic energy in place 1 and 2 is
zero, so the amount of work after impact is:
E D12 Dmg Mgh1 h3 Mgh1 h1 h2
Figure 4
Mgh2
h2 Rcosa2
150
M. Azadbakht et al.
Figure 5
Figure 6
Diagram of displacement-velocity.
Figure 8
Figure 7
repeated 15 times for any level of moisture and height and they
were analyzed using split plot design and SAS software.
Results and discussion
Table 1 shows results of a variance analysis of canola stalk
cutting under different height and primary moisture content.
Effect of height and moisture content on cutting energy in
probability level of 1% is signicant, but their interaction is
not signicant.
Energy consumption during impact cutting of canola stalk as a function of moisture content and cutting height
Figure 9
151
Relation the initial releasing angle and the nal angle of pendulum.
Table 2 Comparison of cutting energy in
different moisture content.
Moisture (w.b.%)
Energy (kJ)
11.6
18.5
25.5
0.8C
0.92B
1.1A
1.2
Figure 10
Energy(kJ)
Degrees of
freedom
Sum of
squares
Mean square
F-value
Moisture (mc)
Height (cm)
cm mc
Error
2
2
4
84
2.5
10.3
0.13
1.48
1.23
0.72
0.03
0.01
69.95**
40.94**
1.9ns
**
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
11.6
18.5
25.5
Moisture(w.b.%)
Figure 11
Energy (kJ)
10
20
30
1.1A
0.9B
0.8C
152
M. Azadbakht et al.
1.2
Energy(kJ)
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30
Height(cm)
Figure 12