consider whether it should continue to exist as a municipality.
Grand Cache Coal, the town's major employer, shut
down operations late last year.
In December 2015, Grande Cache Coal laid off 220
workers and shut down operations. Earlier that year,
the company cut 175 people when it suspended surface-mine operations. An estimated 750 jobs have been lost.
Alberta will soon announce the phase-out of coal-
fired electricity in the province.
This is a big deal. Coal power is the second biggest emitter of greenhouse gases in the province, behind the energy industry.
Though Moulun has lived in Grande Cache his
whole life he is thinking about leaving.
"I've always loved Grande Cache but because of the outlook right now... yeah I would like to get out because my kids are turning college age too," he said. "But there's no way to get out.
Question: What is perspective?
The government is responsible to protect resources.
The resource workers want to keep their jobs and
way of life.
The consumers or people who want to continue to
enjoy resources/products.
I have put up 2 signs on either side of the
classroom. One sign says disagree and the other
sign says agree. I will ask a question and you will have to decide whether or not the group agrees or disagrees. I will count down from 5 and you have to be there before the I reach 0.
Should the Alberta coal town Grande Cache stay a
municipality/town?
Would the government agree or disagree to have
the town of Grande Cache become part of another
town?
Would the resource workers agree or disagree to
have the town of Grande Cache become part of
another town?
Would consumers agree or disagree to have the
town of Grande Cache become part of another
town?
Would you agree or disagree to have the town of
Grande Cache become part of another town?
New report: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/alberta-coal-town-grande-
cache-may-no-longer-be-a-town-1.3641310
More information: http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/coal-compensation-power-