Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Introduction: Occupational balance is an important and widely used concept in occupational therapy and occupational science.
There is, however, not one unified definition in use, but several different ones, and thus instruments that measure the concept in
research studies are diverse as well. Consequently, it is unclear how instruments and definitions correspond. The purpose of this
study was to examine the coverage of occupational balance definitions by occupational balance instruments.
Method: Within a mixed-methods design we conducted a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of definitions and items of
existing instruments. Definitions and items were extracted from articles identified in a systematic literature search. The extent of
congruence and coverage between definitions and instruments was examined.
Results: The definitions used in 47 articles were structured into 19 categories. The categories which were found in most definitions
were a balance of various occupational patterns and areas (42; 89%) and occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and
responsibilities (35; 75%); 20 instruments were explored. Together they covered 16 (84%) of the 19 categories.
Conclusion: Knowing which instruments cover which dimensions of occupational balance can support occupational therapists,
other health professionals and health researchers in their selection of an instrument to measure occupational balance.
Keywords
Occupational science, assessments, content analysis, outcome research, conceptualisation
Received: 4 February 2014; accepted: 7 July 2014
Introduction
Occupational balance is an important concept in occupational therapy and occupational science. Occupational
balance has been considered as crucial for health and wellbeing since the very beginning of occupational therapy
(Meyer, 1977; Rogers, 1984). Occupational therapists currently explore various concepts to get a comprehensive
picture of occupation, such as occupational balance
(Creek, 2010; Gutman and Schindler, 2007). In order to
identify patients needs for interventions that target occupational balance (AOTA, 2011), and to evaluate their
eects, occupational therapists need to know underlying
dimensions and how to measure them.
There is no single denition of occupational balance
(Anaby et al., 2010b). Most recently, occupational balance
was dened as subjective perception of having the right
amount and variation of occupations (Wagman et al.,
2012a). Furthermore, occupational balance is occasionally
used in relation to or synonymously with life balance, lifestyle balance or worklife balance (Matuska, 2012b;
Wagman et al., 2012b). Occupational therapists need a
tangible denition of occupational balance, which should
reect the concept as accurately as possible to contribute
to the comparability of studies on occupational balance.
Dur et al.
Methods
Within a mixed-methods design we conducted a qualitative and quantitative content analysis (Creswell, 2003) separately, of denitions and items of existing instruments.
Denitions and items were extracted from articles identied in a systematic literature search. The extent of congruence and coverage between denitions and instruments
was examined.
Since it was not the aim of this project, we did not consider
other psychometric properties of the instruments. If the
items of an instrument were not specied in the article they
were extracted from the original source.
Results
Selected articles
The literature search resulted in a total of 517 results, 16
on occupational balance in PubMed, 43 in CINAHL and
18 in Web of Science. The literature search on life balance
brought 263 results in PubMed, 43 in CINAHL and 134 in
Web of Science. Of these, 26 articles were duplicates and
were therefore removed; another 444 articles were
excluded due to their irrelevant contents. Finally, 47 articles were used for further analysis: 26 articles on occupational balance, 15 articles on life balance and six which
contained both occupational and life balance in the titles
and/or abstracts. Consequently, a total of 32 articles on OB
and a total of 21 articles on LB, of which six were the same,
were used for further analyses. Of the 47 articles, 13 provided information on the instrument items, while six additional articles were used to obtain instrument items. Thus,
a total of 19 articles were used for the extraction of instrument items. The articles selection process by the literature
search is shown in Appendix 1 (Moher et al., 2009).
In the tables, we referred to the specic articles and instruments thematically in an alphabetical order of the rst
authors names using the reference number of the articles,
as listed in Appendix 2.
We found 21 articles that described the use or development of 17 dierent occupational balance and two life
balance instruments, and one instrument (Q sort pack)
(Wagman et al., 2012b) that measured both occupational
and life balance. Half of the articles reported the use of
one instrument, eight articles described the use of two to
three instruments and one article referred to the use of
four dierent occupational balance instruments. The last
row of Table 1 represents the number of identied occupational and life balance instruments per article. In total,
20 instruments were described.
Identified categories
Definitions. We identied 96 sub-categories in the extracted
occupational and life balance denitions, which were nally
combined into a total of 19 categories (see Table 1, rst
column (columns articles; rows categories)). An example is the category equilibrium and congruence among
occupations. It contained the following sub-categories: satisfaction and dissatisfaction of occupations; congruence
between desired, ideal and actual occupational patterns; congruence and equivalence in activity conguration; equivalence in the degree of discrepancy between desired and
actual time spent across activities that meet dierent needs.
The following categories were identied as core
dimensions: a balance of various occupational patterns
and areas (42; 89%); occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilities (35; 75%); determinant of health (34; 72%); a balance of time spent, time use,
time pressure, pace and/or rhythm and capabilities and
challenges (both 33; 70%). The percentage of the numbers
of articles per category is presented in Appendix 3.
n OB/LB instruments
0
22
0
21
20
23
24
19
Determinant of health
18
17
n OB/LB instruments
Biological need
Determinant of health
Biological need
Categories
25
26
10
27
11
1/1
28
12
30
1
29
14
13
32
16
(continued)
31
15
Dur et al.
7
39
41
42
43
44
0
0
0
45
46
47
OB: occupational balance; LB: life balance; : described in the definitions of OB; : described in the definitions of LB; : described in the definitions of OB and LB; *: A balance of . . .; (No.): reference of the article
found in the literature search on LB and OB; n: number.
n OB/LB instruments
1
40
38
37
36
35
34
33
Determinant of health
Biological need
Categories
Table 1. Continued.
8
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 78(1)
Dur et al.
Instruments. In the 20 occupational and life balance instruments, we were able to identify a total of 65 categories.
The instruments consisted of 251 items which were used
for further investigation. The instruments characteristics
are briey described in Table 2.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the rst study searching systematically for occupational and life balance instruments, and
exploring their coverage of existing denitions of occupational and life balance.
The results show that a balance of various occupational patterns and areas, as well as of occupational
accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilities,
(89% and 75%, respectively) were the most frequent categories in the articles. The categories that were a balance of
various occupational patterns and areas and of time
spent, time use, time pressure, pace and/or rhythm were
the most frequent dimensions covered by the instruments
(70% and 60%, respectively). This may relate to the fact
that these two categories are easier to measure than other
complex dimensions of occupational balance (Eklund
et al., 2010). Time is fundamental to how people organise
and structure their daily lives, and can therefore be linked
closely to occupation (Edgelow and Krupa, 2011).
However, in two previous qualitative studies, a balanced
use of time was not found to be meaningful concerning
occupational balance for people with a chronic disease,
such as rheumatoid arthritis or Crohns disease (Dur
et al., 2014b; Stamm et al., 2009). Interestingly, the category balanced occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilities was found to be covered
by 35% of the instruments.
The category of biological need was only identied in
occupational balance articles. Moreover, in a recent qualitative study (Wagman et al., 2012b) occupational balance
has been found to be a part of life balance. In order to
guide occupational therapists in their understanding of the
two constructs, further studies on potential dierences or
similarities are suggested.
The health determining eect of occupational balance
has been reported frequently (Anaby et al., 2010a;
Backman, 2004; Sandqvist et al., 2005; Wilcock, 1997).
Surprisingly, even though occupational therapists are convinced that occupational balance has a positive eect on
health (identied in 23 occupational balance articles,
72%), it was found to be only measured by two instruments (Wilcocks Questionnaire on involvement in occupations [I-14] and the Q sort pack [I-18]). Nevertheless,
some of the studies included instruments that assess general health. In order to investigate this eect and a potential link between occupation and health, instruments that
assess general health should be used in addition to occupational balance instruments.
Another fundamental belief of occupational therapists
is that engagement in meaningful occupations is an essential part of occupational balance, as quoted frequently
10
Table 2. Characteristics of the identified instruments which were used, developed or suggested to measure occupational or life balance.
I-No. Name and content
I-1
I-2
I-3
I-4
I-5
I-6
I-7
I-8
I-9
I-10
I-11
I-12
I-13
I-14
I-15
I-16
I-17
I-18
I-19
I-20
No. Items
Personal project analysis: project elicitation list and cross impact matrix (CIM) (Anaby et al., 2010b) [OB]
13
Inter-goal relations questionnaire (IRQ) (Anaby et al., 2010b), [OB]
5
Satisfaction with balance of time spent on occupational areas and patterns (Backman et al., 2004) [OB]
1
Instrument of occupational balance (Bejerholm, 2010) [OB]
3
Profiles of occupational engagement for people with schizophrenia (POES) (Bejerholm and Eklund, 2006b) [OB]
9
Time structure questionnaire (TSQ) (Bond and Feather, 1988) [OB]
26
Satisfaction with daily occupations (SDO) instrument (Eklund, 2004) [OB]
9
Yesterday diaries on temporal occupational patterns of the last 24 hours (Eklund et al., 2010) [OB]
4
Three dimensions of occupational balance (Forhan and Backman, 2010) [OB]
3
Experiences of engagement in patterns of daily occupations questionnaire (Hakansson et al., 2009) [OB]
8
Occupational balance item (also contained in the experiences of engagement in patterns of daily occupations questionnaire)
1
(Hakansson et al., 2011) [OB]
Occupational questionnaire (Smith et al., 1986) [OB]
4
Possible measures of occupational balance (Wagman et al., 2012a) [OB]
15
Two-pages questionnaire on involvement in physical, mental, social and rest occupations (Wilcock, 1997) [OB]
6
Occupation, whats in it for me? (Wilson and Wilcock, 2005) [OB]
1/n.d.
Experience sampling methodology (ESM) (Csikszentmihalyi and Larson, 1987) [OB]
1/8
Occupational value instrument with predefined items (OVal-pd) (Eklund et al., 2003, 2009a) [OB]
26
Q sort pack (Wagman et al., 2012b) [OB, LB]
42
Meaningful activities and needs instrument (MAWNA) (Eakman, 2013) [LB]
21
Life balance inventory (LBI) (Matuska, 2012a) [LB]
53
I-No.: allocated number of the instrument; []: instrument was used or developed to assess occupational balance [OB] and/or life balance [LB],
respectively; n.d.: not described.
Table 3. Categories identified in the definitions of occupational and/or life balance covered by instruments to measure occupational and/
or life balance.
Instrument number (see Table 2)
Categories of OB and LB definitions
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Biological need
Determinant of healthy
Determinant of, or essential for, life satisfaction
Dynamic state and on-going process
Engagement in meaningful occupations
Equilibrium and congruence among occupationsy
Subjective and individual
*abilities and restrictions to adapt occupations
*social, physical and mental wellbeing
*capabilities and challengesy
*caring for oneself and others
*chosen and obligatory occupations
*harmony and conflict among occupations
*occupations (more/less) meaningful for the individual and the
socio-cultural contexty
*occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilitiesy
*various occupational patterns and areasy
*occupational identity, controllability and manageability
*strenuous and restful occupations
*time spent, time use, time pressure, pace and/or rhythmy
*: A balance of . . .; OB: occupational balance; LB: life balance; : core dimensions, indicating that these categories were identified in more than
two thirds of the articles; : category is covered by the specific instrument.
Dur et al.
11
occupations questionnaire (I-10) and the OVal-pd (I17) covered eight categories each. The Q sort pack (I18) covered 13 categories of the occupational and life balance denitions. Since instruments with few items are
more applicable for clinical use, we suggest the development of a brief occupational balance instrument based on
essential aspects important to patients.
Conclusion
The current denitions of occupational and life balance
used in scientic literature could be condensed to 19 categories, of which 16 are covered by 20 identied occupational and life balance instruments. Their examination can
support occupational therapists, other health professionals and health researchers to know which instruments
are already used or developed to measure occupational
balance. In addition, the ndings of this study can assist
these people in their selection of instruments when assessing the need for, or evaluating the eect of interventions
addressing, occupational balance.
12
Key findings
Denitions of occupational balance contained 19 categories. A total of 20 instruments were explored.
Together they covered 16 (84%) categories. The category
of a balance of various occupational patterns and areas
was covered most frequently.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Alexa Binder for conducting the content analysis of the articles. Furthermore, we want to thank the native speakers
Andrea Jordan and Yvonne Schroder for proofreading, and Stefanie
Haider for the discussions on the meaning categorisation analysis.
Research ethics
Ethics approval was not required for this study.
Funding
This research was partly funded by a restricted grant from the
Austrian Science Fund (FWF): [P21912-B09]. The FWF had no inuence on the content of the manuscript.
References
Anaby D, Jarus T, Backman CL, et al. (2010a) The role of occupational characteristics and occupational imbalance in
explaining well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life
5(2): 81104.
Anaby DR, Backman CL and Jarus T (2010b) Measuring occupational balance: A theoretical exploration of two
approaches. Canadian Journal of Occupaional Therapy 77(5):
280288.
AOTA (2011) The role of occupational therapy in disaster
preparedness, repsonse and recovery. American Journal of
Occuaptional Therapy 65(Suppl): 1123.
Argentzell E, Hakansson C and Eklund M (2012) Experience of
meaning in everyday occupations among unemployed people
with severe mental illness. Scandinavian Journal of
Occupational Therapy 19(1): 4958.
Backman C (2001) Occupational balance: Measuring time use
and satisfaction across occupational performance areas.
In: Law M, Baum C and Dunn W (eds) Measuring
Occupational Performance: Supporting Best Practice in
Occupational Therapy. 2 ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack, 203213.
Backman CL (2004) Occupational balance: Exploring the relationships among daily occupations and their influence on
well-being. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 71(4):
202209.
Backman CL, Kennedy SM, Chalmers A, et al. (2004)
Participation in paid and unpaid work by adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology 31(1): 4756.
Bejerholm U (2010) Occupational balance in people with schizophrenia. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health 26(1): 117.
Bejerholm U and Eklund M (2006a) Construct validity of a newly
developed instrument: Profile of occupational engagement in
people with schizophrenia, POES. Nordic Journal of
Psychiatry 60(3): 200206.
Bejerholm U and Eklund M (2006b) Profiles of occupational
engagement in people with schizophrenia (POES): The development of a new instrument based on time-use diaries. British
Journal of Occupational Therapy 69(2): 5868.
Bejerholm U and Eklund M (2007) Occupational engagement in
persons with schizophrenia: Relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. American Journal
of Occupational Therapy 61(1): 2132.
Bond MJ and Feather NT (1988) Some correlates of structure
and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology 55(2): 321329.
Christiansen CH (1996) Three perspectives on balance in occupation. In: Zemke R and Clark F (eds) Occupational Science:
The Evolving Discipline. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 431451.
Creek J (2010) The ENOTHE terminology project. In: The Core
Concepts of Occupational Therapy. A Dynamic Framework for
Practice. London, UK; Philadelphia, USA: Jessica Kingsley
Publishers, 1731.
Creswell J (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and
Mixed Methods Approaches. (Vol. 2) Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE Publications.
Csikszentmihalyi M and Larson R (1987) Validity and reliability
of the experience-sampling method. Journal of Nervous and
Mental Disease 175(9): 526536.
Dubouloz CJ, Laporte D, Hall M, et al. (2004) Transformation
of meaning perspectives in clients with rheumatoid arthritis.
American Journal of Occuaptional Therapy 58(4): 398407.
Dur M, Sadlonova M, Haider S, et al. (2014a) Health determining concepts important to people with Crohns disease and
their coverage by patient-reported outcomes of health and
wellbeing. Journal of Crohns and Colitis 8(1): 4555.
Dur M, Steiner G, Fialka-Moser V, et al. (2014b) Development
of a new occupational balance-questionnaire: Incorporating
the perspectives of patients and healthy people in the design
of a self-reported occupational balance outcome instrument.
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 12(1): 45.
Eakman A (2013) The meaningful activity wants and needs
assessment (MAWNA): A new perspective on life balance.
Journal of Occupational Science. Epub ahead of print 12
February 2013. DOI: 10.1080/14427591.2013.769405.
Edgelow M and Krupa T (2011) Randomized controlled pilot
study of an occupational time-use intervention for people
with serious mental illness. American Journal of
Occupational Therapy 65(3): 267276.
Eklund M (2004) Satisfaction with daily occupations: A tool for
client evaluation in mental health care. Scandinavian Journal
of Occupational Therapy 11(4): 136142.
Eklund M, Erlandsson L and Leufstadius C (2010) Time use in
relation to valued and satisfying occupations among people
with persistent mental illness: Exploring occupational balance.
Journal of Occupational Science 17(4): 231238.
Eklund M, Erlandsson LK and Persson D (2003) Occupational
value among individuals with long-term mental illness.
Canadian Journal of Occupaional Therapy 70(5): 276284.
Eklund M, Erlandsson LK, Persson D, et al. (2009a) Rasch analysis of an instrument for measuring occupational value:
Implications for theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal
of Occupational Therapy 16(2): 118128.
Eklund M, Leufstadius C and Bejerholm U (2009b) Time use
among people with psychiatric disabilities: Implications for
practice. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 32(3): 177191.
Dur et al.
13
14
Wilcock AA (1997) The relationship between occupational balance and health: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy
International 4(1): 1730.
Wilson L and Wilcock A (2005) Occupational balance: What tips
the scales for new students? British Journal of Occupational
Therapy 68(7): 319323.
Appendix 1. Flow diagram: article selection process based on a systematic literature search
Dur et al.
15
References of OB articles
No.
References of OB articles
No.
References of LB articles
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
(Eakman, 2013)
(Hakansson et al., 2006)
(Hakansson and Matuska, 2010)
(Johansson et al., 2012)
(Lisson et al., 2013)
(Majnemer, 2010)
(Matuska, 2012a)
(Matuska, 2012b)
(Matuska and Christiansen, 2008)
(Matuska et al., 2013)
(Pentland and McColl, 2008)
(Piskur et al., 2002)
(Reece et al., 2009)
(Wada et al., 2010)
(Wagman et al., 2011)
All
OB
LB
Biological need
Determinant of healthy
Determinant of, or essential for, life satisfaction
Dynamic state and on-going process
Engagement in meaningful occupations
Equilibrium and congruence among occupationsy
Subjective and individual
*abilities and restrictions to adapt occupations
*social, physical and mental wellbeing
*capabilities and challengesy
*caring for oneself and others
*chosen and obligatory occupations
*harmony and conflict among occupations
*occupations (more/less) meaningful for the individual and the socio-cultural contexty
*occupational accomplishment, performance, roles and responsibilitiesy
*various occupational patterns and areasy
*occupational identity, controllability and manageability
*strenuous and restful occupations
*time spent, time use, time pressure, pace and/or rhythmy
16
74
16
58
23
67
35
33
14
70
26
35
26
67
79
91
40
51
74
22
71
3
61
32
54
39
45
6
68
8
32
29
54
74
94
23
54
64
0
67
33
44
0
83
33
0
33
61
4
33
11
72
89
72
67
33
72
*: A balance of . . .; OB: occupational balance; LB: life balance; All: percentage of all articles; y: core dimensions, indicating that these categories
were identified in more than two-thirds of the articles.