Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ter w 1,00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 $0.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 150.00 200.00 t 70.00 6.59 0:00, 5°33 143.30 144.02 144.79 145.42 146.10 146.77 148.08, 152.44 155.36 50:00 2 128171 129l65 130155 1a1l43 139129 133011 194.76 140706 143.36 100700, 9iaz 113123 i1dl49 11513 tielss 117.99 119/08 121119, 177.78 131192 tzor00 | 11127 “12160 “1491 eti7a “e4279. “e741 ‘9:72 "99.72 10013 110118 qdoroo | 13209 1413 18:59 17.38 21,13 $2.66 4e.15 e173 81:66 "90:17 ieor00 | 14!87 15:77 16:89 18:20 i980, 20.65 33105 60.82 71263 ieor0n | i6:61 19:40 18133 1913820731 23132 2709 45.61 57:09, 20000 | 18:31 1901 19182 2016821761 23:70 26:19 38.27 arc Zeoroa | 19797 20.40 2ils2 2207 alos Baise 3440 Eaamersetd zhoroo | 21759 22:16 dalal 25148216 dhles 35162 37121 33.96 39.68 260:00 | 23°16 236924128 2418825750 26113 26:78 28.15, 33.71 38:35 260700 | 24.70 2318 26:28 26184 2741 29.99 39220, 3395 arias jooroo | dels 26.63, 27:67 ells 28:70 39123 sola Beta 3riak S20r00 | 27:88 a0 Bos 3 999 SF Sie 35019 38:18 340700 | 29709 29149 $ola7 30182 31127 a7 32163 36.01 38:65, 3eor00 | 30149 3086 31:0, 32512 32153. 3295 33/80, 36.91 39.30 380-00 | 3186 32:22 33100 3340 33:79 3418 34.98 37es 40:08 $30:00 | 36:47 36:78 37.46 37.77 38.09 38.42 39.07 inge 43.08 500-00 | 39.63 39.90, 40:50 40:79 A108 4137 1:95, 431993147 5so:00 | 42.69 42.94 aside 43175 4401428 Galo 4662 47194 éoor00 | 45269 4591 Meial e263, 4689 47.13 A761 49127 50:46 yoo'00 | 51750 $1169 52512 32133 53.15 5436 55138 ys0:00 | Sars 54152 Sela s5211 53.88 57:19 $8212, fooroo | $7213 $7130, 5767 $7186 58.58 60267 00:00 | 62°59 62.74 6307 63:23, 3.68 6e:97 65:73, » Berd 2$0,00 200.00 250,00 400.00 450.00 $00.00 600.00 700.00 800-00 900.00 1000.00 Tin 70.00 40:00.| 158.11 160.74 Sooo | Laely/ Lasts 132.72 as9.90 198.44 noo:00 | 138273 13929 dais 143.72 148.70, iz0%00 | 115136 120/02 124-21 128109 151.74 340700 | tog: 111130128797 120/21 124215. 14oloa | "96:79 102188 107/97 12:55 116.77 16000, 92:39 "97130 109.17 18000 79195 a5.51 "90.49 103.04 200700 69:91 75.60 80.73 93.71 100.99 220-00 e236 Glee 72193 85:92 93.27 260-00 5319 $7183 62134 Tako 8187 50:67 3419 58:98 jog) 77:11 folo2 52182 36.54 eriio 73157 aero $1.42 54.81 66.61 21123 $0102 52186 61.23 663 47125 tg!80 52139 60.16 65.25 apa7 ole $2119 59.41 6hL18 tnise S080 $2.48 Sasa 62163 Sots Sisal $:s0 35:21 Sere §2:22 520s $3749 $4196 e144 59°48 62.58 56113 35:40 56.70 $8101 60.70 63.45 Seia2 374658163 Sergi 62.22 G4-68 Gelso tres Gole9 1.76 6aloe 6617 Galas 7073 Tala Goa Gila? 62183 63161 65181 67186 69191 72.01 74.14 62127 64.13 65.08 65194 67-78 69.65 T1156 73.49 75.45 68101 68.78 69:55 70:34 71:92 73:56 75:18 76.84 78.53 $2:92_9140_ $408 44177_76217_77158__ 79:03 60.49 _ 81.97 4. Phys. Chom. Ret. Data, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1985,‘THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF FLUID AIR 231 3.2. Residual Thermal Conductivity ‘The pressure dependence ofthe thermal conductivity of airhas not ben investigated as muchas the thermal onduc- tivity ofthe dilute gas repion. As the distribution of exper- rental data in Fig. 1 reveals, in certain pressure and tem- perature ranges data do not exis. However, in many cases the residual concept offers a useful tol to obiain the missing data by extrapolation, provided the concept can be applied and no splitting of the isotherms occurs at higher densities. This can easily be checked when the residual part of all data points plotted verous density. In cases wherea large satter ‘observe, especially at igh densities, one may deduce that the residual part is not function of density alone. In such cases the concept is not applicable in its simple form but requires additional temperature functions. ‘After oars onalynin of the experimental date, the measurements of Tsederberg and Ivanova,"*Fleeter, Kestn, and Wakeham,” and Scott etal were selected. For the representation ofthe residual thermal conductivity ofthese data, polynomial of 4th degree turned out to be suficent, Ady =D, pp + Dap, + Dap + DaPi> (8) swith tho sosisionte Listed below: D,=3.12013125, D; Dy = 1.65049430, Dy = 2.307 624 00-10, 1.911 481 75.10-, Again, the residual thermal conductivity is reduced by the factor A from Eq. (6). We have Aly, = A2 /A, whereas the density was reduced by its critical valuep, = p/p,..Figure3 presents the residual thermal conductivity according to Eq, (8) and compares calculated values with the selected experi- ‘mental data ‘By means of Eqs. (3) and (8) representing the new set of recommended values, we calculated a skeleton table for the thermal conductivity of air for given pressures and tempera- turee (Table 1), The epacing of temperatures and presturwe ‘was chosen in different steps in order to permit a safe inter- polation ofthe values. However, in process design systems, nox hema Conducts Tempera TE the use of Eqs. (5) nd (8) is recommended for easier compu- tation. Jn order to give an illustrative representation and & lear view of the influence of pressure and temperature on ‘the thermal conductivity, we plotted a perspective view of the surface (Fig. 4). ‘The fact that air isa mixture requires thatthe shape of ‘the surface difers from that of a pure substance only in the nature of the bubble line and the dew line properics. The diterence isnot visible m Hig. 4 As atypical feature a pre- dominant iniuence of temperature on thermal conductivity is observed, showing two main characteristics. At low te- peratures one notes oteep decreas of thermal conductivity with increasing temperature, asis typical for Hiquids. As can boeseen from Fig, 4 thiseffect is still noteworthy at pressures far above the critical point. where a distinction between the liguid and gascous phase cannot be made. Thus in this re- son, the thermal conductivity exhibits liquidlike behavior ‘At higher temperatures. thermal conductivity passes through a minimum along the isobars and then increases Its ‘behaviors then comparable to that ofa gas. The liquid- and the guslike behavior reflect the different mechanisms of mi- sroncopie energy transfer, The boundary between the gaid- and the gasike behavior is the locus of all minima of the isobars. 4, Estimation of Uncertainty ‘To assess the uncertainty of the recommended values, all the experimental data and also the data from previous compilations were compared with the recommended vals “The results ofthese calculations are summarized in detail in Table 2. The mean departures and their standard deviations suggest moderate discrepancies among the results of the dif. ferent authors. The data of tolyarov,Tpatew, and Tendoro- " and Gaiee and Schifor™ acom to boayetematioaly too ow; this holds also for tables given in the Landolt-Bérnstein series.” The earlier compilation of Tsederberg” and also the Ton 4. Phys. Chem. Ret. Data, Vol 14, No.1, 1985232 K. STEPHAN AND A. LAESECKE ‘rable 2, Comparison of the recommended data set with other sources and compilations Rothor? Tenperature Pressure Wethod Mean departures Number of Ret Year Range K Range bar i Stands dev. Points te o0-200 2 wot vine 1 7aoe ® 1" 7 Stolyarov 293-435 a-su0 Coaxial 5.243.918 1950 eylinger 7 * . Vines se-2173 1 Coaxial 9.0304 1960 ur eylinger nae 5 ° beter 379-1373 a hot wire -2.140.5 © v 10 sel $ Golubev 196-424 1-500 coaxial Lae Gow 426 oma 423.64 ao a Senetleben 273-673 1 Hot wire 1,483.6 8 2 a2 sen wi 33) Sgemichect —gaa-r7 a Egherieat — ovta09 22 566 cali Ghambir 308-363, 1 Hot wire 0,242.2 3 uM 1367 ‘rsederbers 70-360 1 Hot wire -0.981.0 8 we 5 isi 98-490 0,282.0 4 a8 reving arsaee a mot wire -1.980.2 5 ° u 173 Tarimanoy —gup-199 1-500 Hot wire 41,381.34 20 w 107 Fleeter 300, 130 Hot wire “140.5 8 B w i980 scott suu-auo 2 Hot wire 398 312373, 9-528 Yassermann 75-160 1-500 Compilation 0,742.4 8 106 23 Teederberg 273-1279 1-200 compilation 3.5413 4 a 1965 Landoit~ Bornstein 273-473 saw compilation ~2.942.9, 4 51 2 i968 Garroll —— s6u-suu asia compiiation 0,713.04 302 a 08 ‘Touloukian 50-1500 a compilation ~0.820.7 & ry ‘ Vargactik — 95-00u 13-1000 compilation 1,281.6 & 183 6 378 4. Phys. Chem. Ret. Data, Vol. 14, No.1, 1985‘THE THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF FLUID AIR 233 retook ta a Pressure p (bar) FFic.5. Comparison of data from ther erature sources with value calev- Ine dreamt fat pcynnadn as meshen T= SDK. wa recent set of Vargafik etal seem to be too high. ‘A more detailed assessment, however, can be read from Aeparture plots slong selected ixatherms, ae given in Figs. 8 forthe widely spaced isotherms 130, 300, 400, and 800 K. nthese diagrams, the deviation of each literature data point denoted by dna, is defined according to 100 snp — Amv anv % with 2ny being the recommended value. The maximum de- ation among difacent anne at temperatures of 200 and 400 K is as high as 12%. It reduces considerably, if those ata were omitted that appear systematically too low; then ‘the maximum uncertainty would be estimated to be at most 4%, and 2.5% at higher temperatures above 400 K. ‘These uncertainties clearly exceed the values claimed by the authors themselves. In order to reduce these uncertainties, Auiber eaperimcuts ate nevessary at suberlcal pressures and temperatures, especialy in the liquid region. Likewise, itis highly desirable to explore by new experi- iments the thermal conductivity of si in the critical epion 130008 ge A) Day) ar Pressure p {bor} ate Fic.7, Comparison of data from ther terturesources with value clon Inte fom theeqation fsa propsedin this work tT = 400K. and to examine a possible critical enhancement. As can be soon from Fig. 3, present data da nat eupport a divergence of the thermal conductivity of air in the critical region. How- ever, it must be expected thatthe overlapping enhancements ‘of the thermal conductivities of the most important constitu- ‘ents of air, nitrogen, and oxygen will result in an enhance- ‘ment in the thermal conductivity of ar, too. It therefore has tobe assumed that values calculated from Eas. (5)and(8) will ‘vecuusiderably wustmall at deusiles vu! 200 1 490 kyu, ‘pressures from 30 to 80-bar, and temperatures from-120 to 100K. Dering preparatinn of thie pape, the authore wore ine formed about a similar evaluation carried out by Kadoye, ‘Matsunaga, and Nagashima.® A comparison to the results reported here revealed almost perfect agreement in the selec- tion of the most reliable data sets. To represent them, Ka- doya et al, adopted an equation of state, with 12 adjustable parameters, which agrees with Eqs. (5) and (8) proposed here sm seven structural terms. Values that were calculaved frou ‘both equations in the range of available experimental data ‘agree well within the tolerances ascribed to the recommend od data ot, = aT ain via) ols) ts 6) im ta) Pressure p [bar] Fic. 6. Comparison of data fom othe itrature source with ales cae Intatrom taequation tsa proposed nts Wore at = 0K. Waa Ta S00 Pressure p Ibar] Fie, 8. Comparison of data from other erature sures with valves cal ‘atedrom teequston oat proposain tte wore! = 20 ‘Phys. Chem, Ret, Data, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1885234 5. Acknowledgments Weowe sincere thanks to the Deutsche Forschungsge- reinschaft (DFG) for financial support. The help of Mr. R. Krauss is gratfilly acknowledged. The work described in this paper was performed in consultation with the Subeom- imittecon Transport Propestis ofthe International Union of ure and Applied Chemistry (TUPAC), The authors are in- debted to Professor J. Kestin for his valuable suggestions. 6. References LD. Boehrand K. Scher, Die ThermodynamischenEigenchafen der Luft (Springer, Ben, 960, 240A. Vanvermana, Ya'Z Kezavchinei and VA Rabinovich, Therma: hysal Properties of ir and ts Component (Nauk, Moscow, 1966 Resin. ALA. Vasserman and V. A. Rabinovich, Thermophys! Properties of [Linu is and ts Comaonons Standar. Moca. 1968 in Rian *¥-8.Touloakian PE tile, and: Saxena, hermoph pial Popertes ef Mater. Vo. 3: Thermal Conductoy. Nonmetallic Liguls ond Gases (Plenum, New York, 1970, SN. B. Vergalk Tables onthe Thrmophyical Properties of Liu and Gases, 2d Hemisphere, Washington, 1973). NCB Vargfl, LP. Flipov, A.A. Tazimanov, and EB. Tol, ‘Thermal Conductvy of Ligue and Gazer Standard, Mocom, 1978 Rian, "MW. faylor and ML. Jonson J. Cem. Pays. 1,219 1940) "ELA. Stlyazoy,V.V-Tpatiey, and V.P-Teodorovch, Zh. Fi Khim. 24, 1651950) RG. Vines, Tans. Am. Soe: Mech. Eng. 82,48 (1960) “H, Gcie and K, Sb, Ally, Waseca 4, 70(1960, LF Golbey,Teplocnrgetia 10, 781963. ‘SE-H, Senfleben, . Angew. Phys. 17, £6 (1964, 4. Phys. Chem. Ret. Data, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1985, K. STEPHAN AND A. LAESECKE LT. Cermichaa and B. H, Sage, AICHE. 3, 5891960, °K Ghambr,J.M. Ghani andS.C Saxena, Ind Pore Appl: Phys 5, 4571967 "=D, L, Caroll H.Y. Lo, and L.1. Ste J. Chem. Eng, ata 13,53 (1968). YON. V. Teederberg and Z. A. Ivanova Therm. Eg. 18,100 (1971) 1). eving, DT Jamieson, and D. 1. Piaget, Trans, Inst. Chem ag. St, 101973, "ALR Tarsmanoy and RS. Saimanov, Teploss. Vox. Temp 5, 912, usm, "R, Flt, J. Ket and W. A. Walsham, Physica (Amsterdam) 103A, 521 1980, ‘Thermophys 2,103 (198) DIN. V. Taadrtry, Thermal Conducity of Gas and Liguids (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1965) Landolt Béentin, Zahloncert wd Bunrinon Spins, Ben, 196) Yo. Past 5. K. Stephan and K. Lucas, The Vico of Dense Fis (Plenum, New York, 1979, MELT M Hane. RD, MeCart. and E.G. Coben. Phos Utrecht 320973) H1.1.M Hanley, K.E.Gubbins andS. Mord J. Phys. Chem. Ref Data 4 ustus™. HL. M. Hanley, R.D. McCarty, nd W-M. Haynes, Cryogenics 1,413 (0575. RC Reid J.M, Prawn, nd'Th K Sherwood, The Propetsaf Gass and Luis, 3 0, (McGraw-Hil, New Yor, 197 2K Kadosa, N. Matsunaga and A. Nagashia,"Viroity and Thermal ‘Gonguctiiy ot Air 4 Wide Kange or teiperaare and Frese ‘Report tothe TUPAC Subeommites on Transport Properties Lyngby, Denmark, 18-19 August 198, A. Lacscke and R. Krauss, "Comment on the Caleuation ofthe Ther ‘nal Gondotity of Paid Ai” Report of ast hs Technine Thr ‘modynamik und Thermiche Verfahrenstechik, Universi Stutgat, November, 1983.