Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tm tt
Qu trnh vn chuyn kh t nhin bng ng ng cao p, dn kh mt pha t ni khai thc v ni x l c xy
dng m phng thng qua lp trnh gii h cc phng trnh m phng mt chiu (1D), p dng cho lu cht kh t
nhin c xem xt chi tit cc thng s c tnh. Nhm tc gi s dng phng php gii tun t cc phng trnh m
phng ng dng kh t nhin v ngh n gin ha phng trnh cn gii gim thiu thi gian tnh ton, p
ng c yu cu ng dng thc t cng nghip. Kt qu thu c trong nghin cu ny so snh vi kt qu tnh ton
s dng phn mm thng mi chuyn dng cho thy, m hnh xy dng trong nghin cu ny c sai khc tng
i l 0,41% i vi p sut, 0,39% i vi lu lng v 0,29% i vi nhit ca tuyn ng, y l 3 thng s quan
trng trong qu trnh theo di v d on cc thng s vn hnh tuyn ng dn kh 1 pha, sai s cc i l 3,1%. S sai
khc ny ch yu do cc gi nh vt l v khng do cc thut ton hoc xut n gin ha m hnh ton hc gy ra.
T kha: Vn chuyn kh 1 pha, ng ng dn kh cao p, phng trnh trng thi, m hnh truyn nhit, m phng ng.
1. t vn
Hin nay, kh t nhin c xem l ngun nng lng
cho tng lai, l ngun nng lng ha thch t gy hiu
ng nh knh v cc tc ng mi trng nht so vi cc
loi nhin liu cng ngun gc. Thnh phn ca kh t
nhin ch yu l cc hydrocarbon v mt s t cc tp
cht. Trong quy trnh cng ngh x l kh t nhin, mt
trong nhng vn lun c quan tm nghin cu l ti
u qu trnh vn chuyn kh v phng php vn chuyn
kh t nhin bng ng ng [1].
Ti Vit Nam, nhu cu s dng kh t nhin ngy mt
tng cao, lng kh c cung cp t ni khai thc n
ni ch bin v tiu th ch yu qua h thng cc ng
ng dn kh [2]. Vi c im tuyn ng cao p, vic xc
nh v o c cc thng s trng thi ca kh nh p sut,
lu lng, nhit v thnh phn kh ch c th thc hin
c ti hai im u v cui ca tuyn ng. Trong khi ,
qu trnh ti u, vn hnh, d on cc tnh hung phn
phi kh ca ton b tuyn ng dn kh cn bit c tnh
ca dng kh trn tng im theo khng gian v thi gian
ca tuyn ng, s thay i p sut, lu lng v trong mt
s trng hp cn bit nhit ca kh trn tuyn ng.
Thc t cho thy, qu trnh o c v xc nh thc nghim
thu c cc d liu ny khng phi lc no cng thc
hin c, do , mt trong nhng phng n c u
tin s dng l xy dng m hnh ton hc cho php m
phng d on cc thng s cng ngh ca tuyn ng
thng qua cc d liu c tnh ca dng kh t nhin v ca
tuyn ng. Xy dng m hnh cho php m phng chnh
51
DU KH - S 8/2016
(1)
( u2 + p)
x
f uu
2D
pgsin
(2)
PETROVIETNAM
Trong :
(5)
(6)
Z: H s nn ca kh t nhin;
R: Hng s kh (j/kg K);
D: ng knh trong ca ng (m);
2log
2,51
3,7
Re f
(7)
Trong :
e: nhm b mt ng ng;
Re: Ch s Reynolds.
xc nh h s f, phng php gii lp
c thc hin trong m hnh. Nhm gim
thi gian tnh ton trong m hnh xy dng,
nhm tc gi s dng phng php tnh gn
ng hm ton hc c trong chng trnh
MATLAB.
2.3. Phng trnh trng thi tnh ton cc
thng s c tnh ca kh t nhin
tnh ton cc thng s c tnh ca
hn hp kh t nhin, qu trnh tnh ton
cn c cc thng s ca hn hp kh gm
thnh phn ca cc cu t c trong hn
hp kh, cc thng s ca cc cu t tinh
khit v iu kin nhit ng. Trong m
hnh nhm tc gi xy dng, ngoi cc
hydrocarbon thng gp c trong thnh
phn kh t nhin, m hnh cng p dng
DU KH - S 8/2016
53
(8)
Pr
Tr
Pr
Tr
(9)
(10)
(11)
Trong cc thng s A, B l cc hm ph thuc ca
p sut v nhit .
A = 0,45724
B = 0,0778
Pr
Tr
(12)
Pr
Tr
(13)
DU KH - S 8/2016
PETROVIETNAM
2 x
1
x2 )
(16)
p
= ZRT
(20)
u2
1
c2
Y ( x tn
+1
O ( x 2)
(18)
u2
+1
c2
p ( 0 + 1)
, i +1
+1
+
2
(19)
(21)
(22)
55
(23)
l phi
( )
(24)
(mn+1 )
+1
mn
+ 2
)+ O (
(25)
fc
thnh phn tnh n nng lng
2 DA
ma st c th vit nh sau:
Trong K =
n+1 2
(m )
+1
+1
+1
(26)
56
DU KH - S 8/2016
PETROVIETNAM
Bng 1. Thng s v ng ng
Vt liu
Thp
Nha ng
B tng
Chiu dy (mm)
24
6
40
T trng (kg/m3)
7850
1300
2500
dn nhit (W/mK)
50
0,74
2,9
57
35
Lu lng u vo ng ng
Lu lng u ra ng ng
40
Lu lng
(MSCM)
21
20
300
14
Lu lng
(MSCM)
28
F @ 0 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 0 km - phn mm thng mi
0
101
151
Thi gian (gi)
Model Re
S (%)= 100
Re
10
F @ 50 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 50 km - phn mm thng mi
300
201
Lu lng
(MSCM)
51
Trong :
Model: Kt qu tnh ton thu c bng m hnh
c lp trnh trong nghin cu ny;
20
10
F @ 100 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 100 km - phn mm thng mi
30
0
(27)
Lu lng (MSCM)
20
20
10
F @ 150 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 150 km - phn mm thng mi
0
0
DU KH - S 8/2016
Lu lng
(MSCM)
20
10
F @ 250 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 250 km - phn mm thng mi
30
Lu lng
(MSCM)
30
20
10
F @ 350 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 350 km - phn mm thng mi
30
Lu lng (MSCM)
20
10
F @ 370 km - nghin cu ny
F @ 370 km - phn mm thng mi
0
0
PETROVIETNAM
Nhit (oC)
130
P @ 0 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 0 km - phn mm thng mi
160
130
P @ 50 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 50 km - phn mm thng mi
p sut (bar)
100
160
T @ 50 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 50 km - phn mm thng mi
26
23
T @ 100 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 100 km - phn mm thng mi
26
23
T @ 150 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 150 km - phn mm thng mi
20
0
130
P @ 100 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 100 km - phn mm thng mi
100
p sut (bar)
23
20
29
Nhit (oC)
p sut (bar)
100
26
20
29
Nhit (oC)
160
140
29
120
P @ 150 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 150 km - phn mm thng mi
100
0
20
40
60
Nhit (oC)
p sut (bar)
29
Nhit (oC)
110
P @ 250 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 250 km - phn mm thng mi
Nhit (oC)
p sut (bar)
p sut (bar)
T @ 250 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 250 km - phn mm thng mi
26
23
T @ 350 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 350 km - phn mm thng mi
20
29
90
26
23
T @ 370 km - nghin cu ny
T @ 370 km - phn mm thng mi
20
0
110
80
P @ 350 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 350 km - phn mm thng mi
50
p sut (bar)
23
20
29
130
26
Hnh 6. So snh kt qu tnh ton nhit s dng m hnh c xy dng trong nghin
cu ny v nhit tnh ton s dng phn mm thng mi. Kt qu tnh ton ti cc
im khc nhau dc theo tuyn ng v thay i theo thi gian
110
80
P @ 370 km - nghin cu ny
P @ 370 km - phn mm thng mi
50
0
20
40
60
59
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
DF @ 50 km
DF @ 250 km
-3
0
20
40
60
DF @ 100 km
DF @ 350 km
DF @ 150 km
DF @ 370 km
DP @ 50 km
DP @ 250 km
DP @ 100 km
DP @ 350 km
DP @ 150 km
DP @ 370 km
1
0
-1
-2
-3
0
20
40
60
2
1
0
-1
-2
DT @ 50 km
DT @ 250 km
-3
0
20
40
60
DT @ 100 km
DT @ 350 km
DT @ 150 km
DT @ 370 km
Hnh 7. So snh kt qu tnh ton lu lng (DF), p sut (DP) v nhit (DT) s dng m
hnh c xy dng trong nghin cu ny v kt qu tnh ton s dng phn mm thng mi.
Sai khc tng i c biu din ti cc im bin thin theo thi gian v khng gian
60
DU KH - S 8/2016
PETROVIETNAM
61
Summary
Natural gas is mainly transported undersea in large-scale and long distance pipelines. Prediction of the gas pipeline
temperature and pressure profiles is very important in the operation of natural gas transport, especially in case of accidents of pipeline upstream or downstream. An analytical method for calculation of these profiles has been developed
and this method of implicit high order finite difference scheme could be a good choice to build the software for simulation
of dynamic gas pipeline. In this work, an implicit finite difference scheme has been used to solve the energy equation, the
continuity and momentum equation. The flow model was validated by comparing the computed results to commercial
software for an offshore natural gas pipeline, with defined natural gas composition. The modelled results showed good
agreement with the commercial software (with an average absolute deviation of 0.41% on pressure, 0.39% on flow and
0.29% on temperature).
Key words: Transportation, high-pressure pipelines, equation of state, heat transfer model, dynamic simulation.
62
DU KH - S 8/2016