DLSU LAW
Statutory Construction
Justin Suegang
statues 2 Curative
2 Mandatory
introduction 4 Directory
S. Substantive
law. a rule of conduct formulated and made 6 Remedial
obligatory by legitimate power of the sate 2. Penal
Statute-an act ofthe legislature, as an organized
body, expressed in the form, and passed
‘according tothe procedure required to constitute
Itas partof the law of the land.*
Classification:
‘According to scope:
1. Public- affects the public t large or the
whale community
2. General- applies to the whole
state and operates upon all
people or all class; does not omit,
any subject or place
b. Special: relates to a particular
persons or things or class or toa
particular community
Local: confined to a specific place
‘or community
2. Private- applies to specific person or
subject
According to duration
1, Permanent- operation isnot limited in
duration but continues until repealed
2. Temporary: duration is for limited
period; ceases upon the happening of an
‘event for which it was passed
Other classifications
‘According to opplication
1. Prospective
2. Retroactive
‘According to operation:
1. Declaratory
“pian Dacron 5g ata ow Maes) 08 Eee
ede during te vitnary perenne ae 3a
ens tes se they werepssed ne rset nthe
‘strc ah nate power.
on
According to form:
1. Affirmative
2. Negative
‘Manner of referring”
11 Public Act: passed by Philippine
‘Commission and Philippine Legislature
(4901-1935)
2. Commonwealth Aet- passed during the
Commonwealth (1936-1946)
3. Republic Aet- passed by Congress of the
Philipines (1946-1972:1987-present)
4. Batas Pambansa. pacced by Bstarang
Pambansa
Enacting statutes
Legislative power- authority to make laws, and to
alter and repeal them
‘This is held by the people, in thetr original,
sovereign and unlimited power. But they have
vestedit in the Congress of the Philippines.”
Procedures in passing. law:
"apart from the provisions in the Constitution
(Sec. 26 Par 2, Art. Vi)’, each house has its own
Saas sen pambwed ans as arame
"section 1 (Cons Te esave per she vse in the
“1 (0 No pees eter House sa bcone om nee
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY. WIGBERTO TANADA, J.DLSU LAW
etailed procedures embodied in their Rules (Sec.
16 Par. 3, Art. VI),
1. Abilsintroduced by any member of the
Congress, signed by the authors and filed
with the Secretary of the house. May
introduce in either house except
appropriation, revenue or tariff bills, bills
authorizing increase of public debts, bills
‘of local applications, and private bills (Sec.
24 an.)
2, First reading: Secretary reports the bill for
first reading:
+ Reading the title and number of
bil
Referral to appropriate
committee for study and
recommendation
- Committee may hold public
hearings and submit its report
and recommendation for
Calendar for second reading
3. Second reading- bil shall be read in full
with the proposed amendments by the
committee
Subject to debates, pertinent
‘mations and amendments
After these, bill shal be voted
upon
4, Third reading- final vote by yeas and nay’
“after a house has approved thelr own version, it
il be transmitted to the other house, which will
follow the same procedures. f without
amendments, the bills passed by Congress and is
submitted to the President. If there are
‘Meer andthe yeas ara ays emereaia he oul as
“alaporeniton event oars, basanertne ners ot
shpat, and a
a grea care wih amare
readings on septate ay ad ped copie ial em maybe
‘Spend wi Tle weary Ranh
oo) |
‘amendments, there willbe a Conference
Committee
5. Conference Committee. this is where the
differences will be settled. The
amendments introduced in this level will
have to be approved by both Houses for
passages
6. Approval and authentication - signing of
the Senate President and the House
Speaker and their respective secretaries
(€nrotied Bil)
7. Submission to the President.”
Allis passed in three ways:
1. When the president signs it
2. When the president does not sign nor
communicate his veto ofthe bill
within 30 days after his receipt
3. When the vetoed bill is repassed by
Congress by two-thirds vote of all its
members, voting separately.
Enrolled bill the bill as passed by Congress,
authenticated by the House Speaker and Senate
President and approved by the President
Rule: The text of the act as passed and
approved is deemed importing absolute
verity and is binding on the courts. If
there has been any mistake in the printing
eras ene diferent fom hase thts Howes ore
‘nay dal gear win the ject mateo recy 3h
‘erences er even rtocuce new pone However, Msi
‘thsfortne poner of eames se boa. Thay me
ui scenst cal is the Tha House Ppa oe
Psouatany Patel.
section 21 (2 ry il pasa bythe Congres sha, ble
Smee sat seo otherwise, he sal veto iad etn he sae
‘wth sobjectons tothe Rowe where Merginte, whith hal
‘Sh iuze ullage os the bi shal bese, txt wth
the obesans othe three by wh Rebalakewse be
‘em a pony ost te nos of
‘uw hall detarrive ype ma andrea the
emoers voting or enn al be ered noun Te
‘ovate win ty doy afe dato ee eres,
cher, became bw fhe a Snes
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY. WIGRERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
ofthe bill before it was certified, the
remedy is by amendment by enacting a
curative legislation and not judicial
decree."
Bresumation: It carries on its face a
solemn assurance by the legislative and
executive departments of the
‘government that it was passed by the
assembly. Hence, the respect due to co:
equal and independent departments
requires the judiciary to act upon that
assurance and to accept all bills duly
authenticated."
Journal Entry-a requirement by the Constitution
to each house of the Congress (Sec. 16 Par. Art.
wy
~ conclusive with respect to matters that
are required by the Constitution to be
recorded therein
= based from considerations of public policy
“Enrolled bil v, Journal Entry
particularly with respect to matters not expressly
required to be entered into the legislative
record,”
Exception: When the Speaker and Senate
President withdraw their respective
signatures from the signed bill where
there is serious and substantial
discrepancy between the text of the bill
as deliberated and shown by the journal
and that of the enrolled bill."
“exch House shal ep ournal a rceeegs and
Isjedgmen, tet nana seat andthe eas nd mo 9
Sues isthe rust tne ty of he Maren peso
oH
Parts of a statute
‘ase of conflict, the enalles bill shoul prevall,
a ee 26(3 fr pane by he Congr
connote heh sal exprened nthe ie treat 3
Title
= Bill must embrace only one subject
expressed inits title!
= But must not be an index te, or be an
‘exhaustive catalogue of the body of
the act as to cover every single detail
+ Its enough that the ttle indicates the
general subject, and reasonably
covers all provisions of the act and
not calculated to mislead the public
Reasons:
+ Prevent hodgepodge or log-rolling
legislation
= Prevent fraud and surprise through
introduction of provisions not
{germane to the statute (which have
not received notice, action and study
of the legislators)
= Language that must be sufficient to
notify the legislators and the public
+ Title serves as guide to ascertain
legislative intent
How construed:
+ Should be liberally construed
= _ Not be given technical interpretation
nor narrowly construed to cripple or
impede the power of the legislature
= Ifthere is doubr, it should be resolved
in favour af the one ttle-one subject
(resumption of constitutionalty)
Preamble
= Prefatory statement or explanation
(finding of facts, reciting the purpose,
Feason, of aecasion for making the
law). Hence, important role in
construction
= Usually found after the enacting
clause and before the body in
presidential decrees and executive
‘orders
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY. WIGRERTO TANADA, JR.DLSU LAW
+ Legislature seldom puts this because
the reason for the law is contained in
its explanatory note
Enacting Clause
= Part written immediately after the
title
= States the authority by which the act
is enacted
+ Contains the phrases, “Be it enacted
by.” or "Now, therefore, |. by virtue
of the powers in me vested by the
Constitution, do hereby decree...”
Purview/Body of the Statute
= What the law is all about
~ Should embrace one suibject matter
+ The provisions, although different and
diverse, must be alied and germane
to the subject and purpose of the bill
+ Usually divided into sections
[aumbered and contains a single
proposition)
= Usually includes a short tile, paicy,
definition, administrative sections,
sections prescribing standards of
conduct, imposing sanctions for
violations ofits provisions, transitory
provisions
Separability Cause
+ States that if any provision is declared
Invalid, the remainder shall not be
affected
Presumption: Legislature intended a
statute to be effective as a whole and
would not have passed it had it foreseen
that some part ofitis invalid.
Exception: Where provisions cannot stand
alone as to those left, after the vold part,
Is not complete and workable
Repealing Clause
effectivity Clause
= When the law takes effect
on
= Usually 15 days from the publication
in the Official Gazette” or ina
newspaper of general circulation”
‘Kinds of statutes
1. Legislative acts
2. Presidential issuances- those which the
President issued in the exercise of his
ordinance power (Chapter 2, Book I, AC)
3. Sec. 2, Executive Orders. - Acts of
the President providing for rules
of a general or permanent
character in implementation or
execution of constitutional or
statutory powers shall be
promulgated in executive orders.
b. Sec. 3. Administrative Orders, -
Acts of the President which relate
to particular aspect of
governmental operations in
pursuance of his duties as
administrative head shall be
promulgated in administrative
orders.
6 See. 4, Proclamations, - Acts of
the President fixing a date or
declaring a status or condition of
public moment or interest, upon
the existence of which the
operation of a specific law or
regulation is made to depend,
shall be promulgated in
proclamations which shall have
the force of an executive order.
d. Sec. 5, Memorandum Orders. -
[Acts of the President on matters
of administrative detail or of
subordinate or temporary
Interest which only concern a
"2 [CC ave sal ake tt ater ee dys owing ne
‘ompitin ofthe pubicaton inthe fl cate, ile Ri
ha 38 (Alo sal afc aac fan (5) allwing
enone’ fend Sreuon ess oe ped
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
[ATTY. WIGBERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
particular officer or office of the
Government shall be embor
‘memorandum orders.
Sec. 6, Memorandum Circulars, -
Acts of the President on matters
‘eating to internal
administration, which the
President desires to bring to the
attention ofall or some of the
departments, agencies, bureaus
cr offices of the Government, for
information or compliance, shall
bbe embodied in memorandum
circulars.
See. 7. General or Special
Orders.- Acts and commands of
the President in his capacity as
Commander-in-Chief of the
‘Armed Forces of the Philippines
shall be issued as general or
special orders.
3. Administrative rutes and regulations.
Issued by administrative or executive
offices in accordance with, and as
authorized by, law have the force and
effect of law or partake the nature of the
statute
Requirement for validity:
11. Provisions should be germane to the
‘objects and purpose of the law.
2. Not in contradiction with, but
conform to, the standards that the
law preseribes
3. They be for the sole purpose of
carrying into effect the general
provisions ofthe law
“The rule-making power of a public
administrative agency isa delegated
legislative power. It may not use its power
to bridge the authority to enlarge its
power beyond the scope intended.
‘The law passed by the legislature should
be: (1) complete in itself, and (2) should
fica standard, in order for an
‘administrative agency to fill in the details
o)
in the execution, enforcement and
administration of said law.
‘Administrative rute- promulgating
‘anew law with force and effect of
avalid law.
= Administrative interpretations-
rendering an opinion or giving
statement of policy
“The rules are binding upon the Courts,
but the interpretation is not.
44. Supreme Court rule-making power:
the Constitution granted the Supreme
Court to promulgate its own rules
(Sec. Par. 5, Aet.vil}*
*Usually procedural ony for only the
legislative department may create
substantive laws.
5. Local government units- power to
enact ordinances”
Requirements of validity”
1. Not contravene the Constitution or
any statute
2. Not be unfair or oppressive
3. Not he partial or discriminatory
44, Not prohibit but may regulate trade
5. General and consistent with public
policy
6. Not unreasonable
rangay/Municipal/City/Provincial
‘ordinances
(9) oma aes eancaring te pectin sd
etoreement of essen Hen Beare pace, ah
‘pecdy dupsitonf ere st be unr or acouts tthe
sree ant dh rn oats
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY. WIGBERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
Passed by majority vote of council
members
= Submitted to the mayor for
municipality), if unacted for 10
days, considered passed;
governor (for province), if
unacted for 15 day, considered
passed
= Vetoed ordinance may be passed
by avote of 2/3 of councl
members
~ Subject to review by sangguniang
bayan o panglunsod/sangguniang
panlalawigan
~ no action in 30 days, ordinance
willbe presumed consistent with
laws
Valiity of statutes
Presumption of validity
Basis: Before the legislature passes bil, t has
decided the measure to be constitutional. And
when the President approves the bill, he has been
convinced of its validity.
Effect: To justify the nullification ofthe law, there
‘must be clear and equivocal breach of the
Constitution, not a doubtful and argumentative
implication.
“The final authority ta dedlare uncanstitutionality
isthe Supreme Court sitting en banc (Se. 4 Par. 2,
‘Art. vil)*
power includes the duty of the
courts of justice to settle actual
controversies involving rights which are
legally demandable and enforceable
5a sit nay aay
byte arene cout nore ane ster nn de he
Ince tne eocteatycptaton oouatn ot
Shale eqstons lve ned theconcuenscf a
Snibekanbteecaivanditen
see LA MI Con)
on
2. Determine whether or not there has been
1 grave abuse of discretion amounting to
lack or excess of jurisdiction on the part
of any branch or instrumentality of the
Government.
Beauisites:
1. Adtual ease and controversy
2. Locus standi
3, Raised at the earliest possible time
4, Us moto of the case
‘Actual case and controversy
+ There must be a justiciable controversy
(can be decided on grounds recognized by
the law)
Exceptions: Political questions- issues
dependent upon wisdom not the legality of
the law
Locus standi
= Legal standing ta sue
+The person has substantial interest in the
case such that the party has sustained or
will sustain dleect injury
1, Citizen standing-sutfered some
actual or threatened injury as a result
(of the allegedly illegal conduct of the
government (Tanada v. Tuvera)
2. Taxpayer's standing: public funds
have been disbursed in alleged
contravention ofthe law or
Constitution (ITF v. COMELEC)
Basis: Expenditure of public funds by
an officer of the state for the purpose
cof administering an unconstitutional
act constitutes a misapplication of
such funds
3. Legislator’s standing: when their
powers are impaired; questioning the
validity of a presidential veto (Oplev.
Torres)
4. Transcendental significance- the
Court has adopted a liberal attitude
(brushing aside technicalities of
procedure) on standing where the
petitioner has shown that an issue
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
hhas paramount importance to the
public (Chavez v. PEA and AMAR!)
Raised at the earliest possible time
Question must be raised in the pleading,
complaint, information or petition by the
plaintiff or petitioner orin the answer by
defendant or respondent.
Exception:
1. Can be raised in a motion for
reconsideration ifthe statute sought to
be invalidated was not in existence when
the complaint was filed.
2. -Atany stage of the proceedings ina
criminal case®
3. Where the determination of the question
Is necessary to the decision for civil
cases!
4. Where it involves jurisdiction of the court
below’
Lis mota of the case
+The Court may not pass upon the validity
of a statute if it can decide the case on
some other grounds
~ ifthe only issue is the a constitutional
{question which is unavoidable, the Court
should confront the question and decide
the case on the merits
Test of constitutionality
1, Must not contravene the Constitution or
any statute
2, Must be general and consistent with
public policy
3. Must not be unfair or oppressive
4. Must not be partial or discriminatory
5, Must not be unreasonable
6. Must not prohibit but may regulate trade
Grounds for nullification
en
‘Not within the legislative power to enact
2. When it allows something to be done
Which the fundamental law condemns oF
prohibits
3. Vagueness- lacking comprehensible
standards that men of common
Intelligence must necessarily euess at its
‘meaning and differ in its application
Basis:
= Violates due process for failure to
accord the people fair notice of
what conduct to avoid
Leaves law enforcers unbridled
discretion in carrying out its
provisions and becomes an
arbitrary flexing of the
overnment muscle
Effects of unconstitutionality
General rule: An unconstitutional act is nota law,
Confers no right, imposes no duties, affords no
protection, creates no office; in legal
Contemplation, inoperative as though it had never
been passed
‘This is also known as the orthodox view. Not
‘only the parties but all persons are bound by
declaration of nullity; no one may invoke it nor
‘may the courts be permitted to apply it
subsequently
‘The orthodox view is expressed in Art. 7(CC)2”
However, it is not always the case that alaw is.
constitutionally faulty per se (.e., may be valid in
its general import but invalid in its application to
certain situations). A judicial declaration of nullity
‘may not necessarily obliterate all the effects and
consequences of a void act occurring prior to such
declaration. A situation that i fait accompli may
no longer be open for inquiry, let alone to be
unsettled by a subsequent declaration of nullity of
a statute.
‘Modern view
Fhe (| Wane curt scare alan tobe icoaitent ath
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY. WIGBERTO TANADA, JR.DLSU LAW
The court does not annul ar repeal statute it
violates Constitution; it simply refuses to
recognize itand determines the rights of the
parties just as ifithad no existence
The decision affects the parties only
+ Nojudgment against the statute: opinion of
the court may act asa precedent, but it does
not strike out, repeal, supersede, revoke, oF
annul it
Exception: Invalidity Due to Change of Conditions
Inapplicable to a statute that is declared
Invalid because of the change of circumstances
affecting its validity (emergency laws). The
declaration of their nullity should be applied
prospectively, and affect only the parties involved
inthe case,
Partial Invalidity
General rule: Where the part ofthe statute Is
\oid as repugnant to the Constitution, while
another part is valid, the valid portion, if
separable from the invalid, may stand and be
enforced (separability clause)
Beason, Legislature intended a statute to be
effective as a whole and would not have
passed it had it foreseen that some part of it
is iwalid
Exception: When the parts of the statute are
so mutually dependent and connected, as
conditions, considerations, inducements, or
compensations for each other, as to warrant a
belief that the legislature intended them as a
whole, the nulity of ene pare will vitiate the
rest
Effectivity of statutes
‘General rule: Statutes continue to be in force until
‘changed or repealed by the legislature.
*Not changed by change of sovereignty, conquest
07 colanization,
oe
1. Forstatutes proper, usually 15 days from
the publication inthe Official Gazette or
ina newspaper of general circulation,”
unless provided otherwise. But the ruling
ray seem in contradiction with the PVB
Employees Union v, Vega, the phrase
“unless otherwise provided” provided an
exception as to the date of effectivity of a
statute.
2. Forissuances, rules and regulations, there
should be a publication” and fling in the
the UP Law Genter
3. Forordinances, Sec. 59 ofthe Local
Government Code shall apply.””
ae. 21 Lesh ae ect ater een dy tlloninesne
complete of ta sublet nthe fea see west
"se 18 (AC Laws shal take effec after fiteen (19) ys followin
‘necampatan othe pubiestinn nthe ote Cte rina
“Sec 3 ook (AC) ing (1) Every agency sal fle wah the
Linney the Pines Contr nes ceri capes of
‘veya adopted opt sin foe onthe cate echt ot
{stags oma are ted wth vee (3) mae rom ta te
eect of Ornonces or Reston |) Unies others ted
inthe orranceorthe soliton 2pprvng thecal development
flanans pute mermertpeogram ee ame shale ttc sar
fen) day ram te ates eopy ret pote x bul
beardat te envarce of te prove eaptol ty, mune
rangy tl thse maybe aon st east} ther
(3) The secretary tthe ssgguriancnceredsal cae the
“rtane of the ronneal capt an ect, mune or
‘eaney alin at ast to (2 craps placer hela
Sovirmert unconcerned not bterthan ve (dpe er
‘reese by may oe pean te grime
spreads postin
ieithegset aarinaneas wth penal sao shal be publish
tncalogtave body concerned ang, tne stsence oy
frowns where sanggunan ef onan estes
(@intweaeot ahh urbanued dues the ma features ofthe
tem posted, be published ance in local newspaper of general
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, IR.DLSU LAW
‘Manner of computing tim
When the laws speak of years, months, days or
rights, it shall be understood that years are of
three hundred siaty-five days each; months, of
thirty days; days, of twenty-four hours; and nights
from sunset to sunrise.
{if months are designated by their name, they shall
bbe computed by the number of days which they
respectively have,
Jn computing period, the first day shall be
‘excluded, and the last day included.”
Exception: Computation of the prescription of a
rime, if the last fell on a Sunday or 2 legal
holiday, a charge cannot be filed on the next
working day since it shall be considered
prescribed,
“an 13 (C0
oH
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION.
-Art or process of discovering and expounding the
‘meaning and intention of the authors of the law,
where that intention is rendered doubtful by
reasons of ambiguity in its language or the fact
‘thatthe given case is not explicitly provided for in
the law.
Basis: Because of infirmities of language and the
limited scope in legislative drafting.
Interpretation. Art of finding the true meaning
and sense of any form of words
Construetion- Drawing warranted conclusions net
always included in direct expressions, oF
determining the application of wards ta facts in
litigation."
Purpose: Ascertaining the true intent of the
legislature,
‘Assumption: The legislature enacts a law with the
tend in view that it wil, in cases of doubt, be
construed in accordance with the settled
principles of interpretation.
‘Rules of statutory construction are used to
ascertain legislative intent. But they are not rules
of law but mere axioms of experience, hence, not
binding nor controlling on the courts.
Legisfotive intent is the essence of the law. itis
‘the spirit which gives life to legislative enactment
Legislative purpose- reason why 2
particular statute was enacted
Legislative meaning. what the law, by its
language means
‘The primary source of legislative intent should
be the statute ise.
Power to construe
‘The duty and power to interpret or construe a
statute or the Constitution belongs to the
Judiciary (Sec. 4 Par. 2, Art, VII).
eo —
Its the Coure whieh has the final say as to
what the law means.
Limitations: The Court can only construe an
applicable law in controversies which are ripe
for ucicial reselution. Neither moot nor
academic (purpose has become stale or
where no practical relief can be granted or
which can have no practical eect)
Exception: If the issue is “capable of
repetition yet evading review’ especially
where public interest requires its
resolutions *
‘The legislature has no power to overrule the
Interpretation made by the Court.”
‘Meaning: The legislature cannot, by law or
resolution, modify or annul the judicial
construction without modifying ar repealing the
very statute which has been subject of
construction.
Exceptions:
1. When the Supreme Court reverses itself
2. Byamending the Constitution
3. Byenacting a new statute
Endenea v David
AR a juleal declaration interpreting aconsttutianal
provision that taxing sa form of diminution of salary,
Congress enacted a lw to include justices and
members ofthe judicial body inthe scope of taxing
power ofthe government,
Held: Congress cannot, by law, modify an
interpretation of the Constitution made by the court
Including the judicial officers tothe scope of taration is
4 form of interpretation ofthe Constitutional provision
‘against diminution of salaries.
‘When to construe
ua gtr may care wha aaa mens bat
have natal sete ts meng by epee
Dept decison, ts euler cute canton” ensenea
eas)
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
[ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JRDLSU LAW
Condition sine qua non: Before the court may use
its power to construe, there must be ambiguity in
the language of the statute. For where there is no
ambiguity, there is no room for construction, only
‘for application,
Ambiguity- condition of admitting two or more
‘meanings, of being understood in more than one
‘way, or of referring to two or more things at the
same time.
“susceptibility to more than one
interpretation
‘More application, less construction
= The first and fundamental duty of the
court is to apply the law.
Construction comes only after there has
been a showing of ambiguity, hence,
application is impossible
Verba legis (Plain meaning rule)
= Where the statute is clear, plain and free
from ambiguity, it must be given its literal
meaning and applied without
interpretation.
= Where the law speaks in clear and
categorical language, there is no room for
interpretation. There is only room for
application.”
Law cannot be changed under the guise
of interpretation.
‘Maxim: index onimi sermo est (speech is the
Index of intention)
Presumption: The wards employed by the
legislature in a statute correctly express its
Intention or will and preclude the court from
construing it diferenty.
‘Slvaw Cabrera
Cabrera wanted ta construct an ice plant even if there
ean exrting one already owned by pettioner. The
case was brought to the Public Service Commission,
and the agency appointed Atty. Espelleratohhear the
‘ase and receve evidence, The PSC rendered a
decison allowing respondent to operate.
om
eld: Where the law isles, there is only room for
application. Although the law granted the PSC to
appoint an attorney to take testimony ofthe witnesses
if residing distant from Mania, the law is clear that
only the commission can hear, receive evidence, and
render decision,
‘Quijano v.pge
Petitioner 2 veteran, obtained 2 loan fram DP. He
‘wanted 0 pay the subskting obligation through the
backpay certificate
Held: The law s clear, backpay certificate may only be
used to pay forthe laan if the subsisting obligation was
obtained prior to the passage of RA 897. A subsisting
‘obligation may only be considered after receipt of the
loan, not on the day of awarding of application (since,
‘here was silo obligation at that time),
Commissioner of internal Revenue v. Limpan
Investment
The BIR found that respondent had tax deficiencies for
‘more than two years. They brought the case to the
CCoutt of Tax Appeals where it held that the interest
‘and surcharge should start fom peviad where the
{decision became final
Held: The National ternal Revenue Code clearly
stated that in computing the interest and surchat
the tax deficiency t should start from the date of
noice and demand. The CTA, therefore, made an error
winere fixed a new dat.
of
People. Mapa
‘Mapa claimed that he wasaseeret agent of Governor
Leviste when he was charged for Mega possession of
unlicensed frearms.
eld Bithough was eater held that secre agents
maybe exempted from possession of firearms since
‘they do the work of peace officers, the Revised
Administrative Code clearly enumerated those who
‘maybe exempted, and secret agents were not
Included.
(Chartered Bank Employees v. Ople
Employees of Chartered Bank complained that they
were not paid for the 10-day holiday. Employer said
tata circular made by Sec, Ople darned that regular
employees are presumed to be paid forthe whole
year, thereby also counting holiday.
Held: The Labor Code ceariy stated that holidays
should be pai by the employer to regular employees,
hence, the cular is invalid. Moreover it was also
found out thatthe computation for the salaries die not
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JR.DLSU LAW
include said holidays, ence, the employer is eally
lable for sald payment.
Melencires v. COMELEC
-Melencres lost to Concepcion ina barangay election.
Ho filed an election protest oan MTC. Concepcion
filed 2 pattion to the COMELEC and moved to dismiss
itupon knowing that no docket fee waspaid. Hence,
petitioner questioned the jurisdiction ofthe COMELEC,
Held: Payment of docket vests jurisdiction toa court
(Gatchalln v CR). Non-payment ofthis means no
procest must be given due course. The COMELEC Is
Fight when it smssed it since ts Rules of Procedure
provided that protests shouldbe filed 10 days ater the
proclamation; the payment was done 25 days after
Said proclamation,
‘Ratio legis (Spirit of the law)
= Maving away from the literal
Interpretation
‘Maxims: ratio legis et anima legis (the reason
‘of the law is its soul);
ratione cessat lex et cessat lex (when
‘the reason ofthe law ceases, the law ceases)
Presumption: The letter ofthe law ists hoc;
the spirit (reason), the soul; and the
‘construction of the former should never be so
rigid and technical as to destroy the latter.
‘People v.Nazavio
Nazario, a lessee of land used as Fishpond, was taxed
Under @ municipal ordinance. He contended that saié
ordinance was vague.
Held: The aw is not vague. The word “owmer” should
be construed as toinclude petitioner. Since the ands
‘owned by the government, for haa mere lessee, i
canaot be sad tha the tax should shouldered by the
latter for being the owner. Petitioner, being the
‘operator ofthe pond, manager ofthe warkers, and the
‘one who ets profit from it should be responsible for
the tax burden,
‘Usua was charged with a case For allegedly using an
alias in claiming 2 complaint. Since the messenger of
his legal counsel was attending some personal matters,
petitioner asked fr the permission to use the
rmessenger's name. Later, it was found out that he
signed using that messenger’sname
‘Hela: The law penalizing the use of allases should not
be construed lteraly. I shouldbe interpreted inlight
on
ofthe purpose it serves and the evils it seeks to
prevent. Ursua’s use of fititious name ina single
Instance without any sign that he intended to be
known by this name doesnt fall within the provision
ofca3a2,
Supreme Court rulings part of the legal system
Judicial decisions applying or interpreting the laws
or the Constitution shall form part ofthe legal
system of the Philippines.”
Maxim: legs interpretato legis vim ebtinet (the
authoritative interpretation of a statute acquires
the force of the law by becoming a part thereof)
= As ofthe date of the date of enactment
~ Interpretation establishes the
contemporaneous legislative intent
stare decisis et non quieta movere
= When the Supreme Court has once
laid down a principle of law as
applicable toa certain state of facts, it
will adhere to that principle and apply
toall future cases where the facts are
substantially the same
= Assures certainty and stability in the
legal system
Pesfecto v. Meee
Held:
‘ndenciav David
Following the ruling n Perfecto v. Meer that a tax on
SC justices and other officials ofthe judiciary isa
‘diminution of thelr lary, contrary tothe Canstitution,
Congress enacted a law including subjecting them to
income tax and dedaring that itis net a diminution of
thes salary
Hel Congress cannot overrule, na legislative action,
2 construction of a constitutional prowsion made by
the Court In declaring that “subjecting court officals
taincame taxienot a diminution af thei 2aiay,” they
ar invading the province ofthe Court to interpret
laws
‘eonle-v canton
* at (C0) aia ecko apphingarerpetig hea or
Peotone
JUSTIN SUCGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JR,DLSU LAW
“The metal detector beaped when Susan Canton passed
through it Italy she said thot was only money, but
the lady fisher called her superior. She was brought
Inside restroom and win freed. Several grams of
shabu was Foun inher abdominal, gerital, and thigh
Held: Although the Constitution grants the ight to
Pusey, the Tey search conducted to her i valid. The
atrest without a warrant was justified since it was only
Carried out upon discovery and recovery of shabu in
hers tuled in People v-Johnson,
Daf sur
Respondent inherited a land which they devoted for
cattle breeding tnitialy they availed of voluntary offer
to sell because of incentives, but withdrew it after the
CCourt promulgated the doctrine exempting agricultural
lands used for poultry and livestock breeding in Luz
Farms v. DAR Secretary. Paltioner only granted partial
exemption on the basis of an administrative order
‘ssued,
Held The ruling ofthe Cour should be enforced In is
Interpretation in Luz Farm, it clearly declared the
‘exemption of sad lands used in poultry and livestock.
Te administrative order providing for 811 ato is
unconstitutional. Although the DAR may Isue orders
and tegulation, these are subject to judial review.
‘The interpretation ofa statute remains to be
part of the legal system until the Supreme Court
overrules it and the new doctrine overruling the
ld is applied prospectively in favour of parties
who relied on itn good faith,
“Judicial ruling cannot be given retroactive effect
if to do so will impair vested rights and the parties
relied on it in good faith.
‘Maxim: lex prospcit, non respicit (the law looks
forward, not backward)
‘columbia Pictures. CA
‘iter being granted a petition fora search warrant in
an allege place where pirated movies were produced,
‘the Ci dismissed the case when the SC promulgated a
now doctrine requiring the presentation ofthe master
copy.
Held though court interpretations are deemed part
of thelaw during its enactment, it ould notbe applied
retrospectively espedaly when Itintroduces a ew
ruling and vested rights were accrued before
(production of master copy).
oH
People w.Uecera
Defendant was charged with legal possession of,
firearms. He contended that he is exempted from this
rule saying that he was «secret agent employed by
Gov. Leviste of Batangas.
Held: although the then prevaling ruling was People,
‘Mapa, where secret agents are not anymore
considered as peace officer, therefore, not exempted
{rom permit to carr firearms, it was non-existent
when icera was charged, The then ruling was People
\ Macarandang where the Court interpreted secret
agents 25 peace officers. Hence, the latter should apply
to this case since Licera relied on tin good faith
*Only Supreme Court sitting en banc may modify
fr abandon an established principle of law, not
any division (See. 4 Par. 3, Art. Vil)!
Exception: f the Court has stated in a decision net
‘3 principle of law buta mere obiter dictum (a
‘thing said in passing), a division may validly reject
or disregard it
‘The Court has the duty to formulate guiding and
controling constitutional principles, precepts or
doctrines, The power to issue guidelines is not
julicial legislation, the Court mezely defines what
the laws.
Examples:
1. Partylist: Ang Bagong Bayani-OFW Labor
Party v. COMELEC
2. Psychological incapacity: Republic v. CA.
‘and Molina
3, Anti-subversion: People v. Ferrer
4. Rights when arrested: Morales v Enrile
“ lean
Several workers of respondent died when the mine
collapsed. The petitioners asked for compensation
‘which was given. After leaming that there wae
negligence on the part ofthe company petitioners
sued and asked for damages under the Civil Code.
9) cases mates eae bye ison sat be decider
rested withthe convene af amar the eras who
thee of sch Memers When the equied number i nt beamed,
the eve shalloedecieden one: Provide, ht dete or
Prrepea owl down by the eau mo eeson ender or
JUSTIN SUGGANG | BLOCK 2
ATTY, WIGBERTO TANADA, JR,DLSU LAW
Held: There was no|ulcial legislation when the
Supreme Cour helé that petitioners can stil claim