You are on page 1of 1

Referrence list

(1) http://www3.baylor.edu/~Charles_Kemp/hand.jpg
(2) http://www.icp.ucl.ac.be/~opperd/parasites/images/WHO1.jpg Last updated: 22 October 1997.
(3) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Leishmania_LifeCycle.gif
(4) http://www.vacunasaep.org/imagen/mapa_leishmaniasis_visceral.jpg
(5) http://www.internetmedicin.se/images/uploads/Leishmaniasis-tropica,-amas.jpg
(6) http://www.leishmaniasis.info/
(7) Gossage S M, Rogers M E & Bates P A (2003) Two separate growth phases during the development of
Leishmania in sand flies: implications for understanding the life cycle. Int J Parasitol. 33, 1027-1034.
(8)http://www.afip.org/Departments/infectious/lm/05.html
(9) national history museum leishmaniasis journal
(10) http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/001386.htm Update Date: 3/6/2006
(11) http://www.who.int/tdr/diseases/leish/lifecycle.htm
(12) http://www.leishmaniasis.info/
(13) Azadeh B, Samad A, Ardehali S. Histological spectrum of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania
tropica. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1985;79:631-636
(14) http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/l/leishmaniasis/symptoms.htm
(15) http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1255000/images/_1257691_polioboy.jpg
Evaluating sources.
I was careful with internet sources as the internet can be misleading. Where I chose to get my images, I also got
my information from too. The strongest sources with the most accurate information I feel were the national
history museum journal, the WHO website, the growth phases book, the ICP website, the Internet medicine and
the histological spectrum of cutaneous leishmaniasis book. The websites are monitored by professionals with no
access to anybody else. The NLM website is also very reliable as it is updated every day. The book also was
written by 3 professionals, I took interest with the growth phases book as it took the disease to a tinier level,
which had good accurate information. However my other sources, namely Wikipedia are fairly unreliable as
anyone has access to them. These sites were all relevant to the biology I was discussing because they had the
information I needed. The leishmaniasis.info site was based around canines which proved a bit of an obstacle so
I could not fully trust the information as my work was centred on humans.

You might also like