Draft Project9.51

.
2558
5532967023
5532974423

1000 ( PDP 2015)
4 (Monoethanolamine, MEA)
(Diethanolamine, DEA) (Diglycolamine, DGA) 2--2--1-
(2-Amino-2-metyl-1-propanol, AMP) (rate-based)

90 99.5

(profile)

MEA MEA

Title
Simulation of CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants.
By
Mr. Veeraphat Hoontrakul Student id

Mr. Sorrawit Tantipalakul Student id
Advisor
Lecturer Nathapol Pintuyothin
5532967023
5532974423
Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn

University
Academic year
2015
Abstract
This research is presented the detailed description of CO2 capture of flue gas
from coal-fired power plant using amine solvents. We simulate operational units of
1,000 MW coal-fired power plant based on Thailand Power Development Plan 20152036 (PDP2015). Rate-based models are simulated by Aspen plus for four amine
solvents Monoethanolamine (MEA), Diethanolamine (DEA), Diglycolamine (DGA) and 2Amino-2-metyl-1-propanol (AMP). The parameters and operating conditions are
specified to achieve 90% CO2 capture in absorber column and 99.5% CO2 purity from
regeneration in stripper column for each solvents. In this research a comparative study
of absorption performance and re-boiler duty consumption by varying packing height
and packing diameter of absorber and stripper column is reported. Moreover, the
temperature profiles of liquid and vapor in absorber were studied which is used to
check the model behavior. When packing height and packing diameter are increased,
absorption performance is increasing and re-boiler duty is decreasing. MEA has potential
to be better performing solvent than the others, with a lower solvent flowrate, a lower
packing diameter in absorber column comparing to base case and lowest capital cost
investment.
.. 2558 2579 (PDP2015)
1.
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.
2.1
3
3
2.1.1 (Carbon Capture)
2.1.2 (Carbon Storage)
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.3
10
2.3.1 (Monoethanolamine MEA) 10

2.3.2 (Diethanolamine DEA)
12
2.3.3 (Diglycolamine, DGA)
14
2.3.4 2--2--1- (AMP)
16
2.4 Aspen plus
18
2.5
23
3.
25
3.1
26
3.2
26
3.3
30
3.3.1 (Total capital investment, TCI)
31
3.3.2 Utility
33
4.
34
4.1
34
4.2
40
4.2.1
40
4.2.2 Utility
47
5.
48
5.1
48
5.2
49
50
52
52
54
2.1
2.1 (2.13)
11
2.2
11
2.3 2.28
12
2.5 2.28
15
2.5 2.28 AMP
17
3.4
28
3.2
29
3.3 Rate-based
29
3.4
30
3.5
32
3.6
33
4.1
36
4.2 CO2
37
4.3
38
4.4 MEA
40
4.5 DEA
41
4.6 DGA
32
4.7 AMP
43
4.8
44
4.9
44
4.10
45
4.11
45
2.1
2.2
2.3 (Post-combustion)
2.4
2.5
2.3 DEA
12
2.7 DGA
14
2.8 AMP
15
2.9
18
2.10 User-Defined Component Wizard
19
19
2.12 Molecule Editor
20
2.13 Methods Specification
20
2.14 Methods Assistant
21
2.15 Methods
21
2.16 Simulation Mode
21
2.17
22
3.1
25
3.2
27
3.3 Aspen plus
28
3.4
31
4.1
( DGA )
34
4.2 () ()
MEA
35
4.3 () ()
MEA
35
4.4
() MEA () DEA () DGA () AMP
39
4.5
46
4.6
46
4.7
47
4.8
47
1.1

20
2557 [1]
(Greenhouse gas : GHG)

17,855,831 [2]

1000 2 (SCOD)
2564 2567 (PDP 2015) [1]

(Rate-based) Aspen plus
90

(Monoethanolamine, MEA) (Diethanolamine, DEA)
(Diglycolamine, DGA) 2- -2- -1- (2-Amino-2-metyl-1-propanol,
AMP)

1.2
1.2.1
Aspen plus
1.2.2
1.2.3
90
1.3
1.3.1 Aspen plus
1.3.2
1.3.3
1.3.4
1.3.5 Aspen plus
1.3.6
1.3.7
1.3.8
1.4
1.4.1

(PDP 2015)
1.4.2
1.4.3
2.1 (Carbon Capture and Storage: CCS) [3]

2.1.1 (Carbon Capture)
CO2
(Pre-Combustion) (Post-Combustion) (OxyCombustion)
2.5 [6]
2.1.1.1 (Pre-Combustion)

[4]

(Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle Power Generation, IGCC) [5]
2.6
[4]
2.1.1.2 (Post-Combustion)

[4]

[6]
2.7 (Post-Combustion) [6]
2.1.1.3 (Oxyfuel-Combustion)

12-15
89

[6]
2.5
2.1.2 (Carbon Storage)

2.1.2.1 (Indirect Storage) CO2
2.1.2.2 (Direct Storage) CO2

CO2 1 CO2
3
2.2

2.2.1
(Amines) (NH3)

(CH3NH2 CH5N)
(CH3) R R1-NH2
R1R2-NH R1R2R3-N
(ethanolamine
monoethanolamine MEA) (R=CH2CH2OH)

(carbamate)
2.8
MEA 2
1
2R-NH2 +
CO2
R-NH3+ +
R-NHCOO-
heat
(2.1)
2
:
R-NH2 + CO2 + H2O R-NH3+ + HCO3- + heat (2.2)
: CO2
+ H2O+ H2CO3
(2.3)
(2.1) (2.2) (2.3)

MEA (2.2) (2.3)

2R1R2-NH + CO2 R1R2-NH2+ + R1R2-NCOO- + heat
(2.4)
R1R2R3-N + CO2 + H2O
R1R2R3-NH+ + HCO3-
(2.5)
-
MEA
R-NH3+ + R-NHCOO- + heat 2R-NH2 + CO2
(2.6)
(2.2)
HCO3- + R-NH3+ + lessheat R-NH2 + CO2 + H2O
(2.7)
(2.1) 0.5 1 2 (2.2)

2 (1) 1 1

( MDEA)
(aMDEA)

2
(HCOOH CH2O2) SO2 NO2
(heat-stable salts)

2.2.2

40

20
ppmv [7]

[8]
2.9 [9]

(
)

[9]
10
2.3
2.3.1 (Monoethanolamine MEA)
MEA
/ [10]
2.1-2.7
[11]
:
(2.8)
:
(2.9)
:
(2.10)
MEA:
(2.11)
:
(2.12)
2.3.1.1
2.13
(2.13)
Freguia [12]
2.2
11
2.6 (2.13)
2.8
Aj
-0.52
Bj
-2545.53
Cj
0
Dj
0
2.9
231.46
-12092.1
-36.78
0
2.10
216.05
-12431.7
-35.48
0
2.11
-3.038
-7008.3
0
-0.00313
2.12
132.89
-13445.9
-22.47
0
2.3.1.2

2.8 2.9 2.14 2.15
2.16 2.17
(2.14)
(2.15)
(2.16)
(2.17)
Aspen Plus 2.18 2.3

(2.18)
2.7
kj
nj
Ej (/)
To ()
2.14
4.32E+13
0
13249
298
2.15
9.77E+10
0
9855.80
298
2.16
2.38E+17
0
29450.89
298
2.17
2.7963E+20
0
17229.79
298
12
2.3.2 (Diethanolamine DEA)

2.6 H3O+
DEAH+ CO2 DEACOO-
2.10 DEA
2.3.2.1
DEA:
DEAH H 2O DEA H 3O
(2.19)
(2.20)
(2.21)
CO2 2 H 2O H 3O HCO3
HCO3 H 2O H 3O CO3
DEACOO H 2O DEA HCO3
(2.22)
:
2 H 2O H 3O OH
(2.23)
2.3.2.2
2.20 2.22 2.24 2.26

2.25 2.27
CO2 OH HCO3
HCO3 CO2 OH
DEA CO2 H 2 O DEACOO H 3O
DEACOO H 3O DEA H 2 O CO2
(2.24)
(2.25)
(2.26)
(2.27)
13
Aspen Plus 2.28 2.4

r kT n exp(
r
k
T
E
R
N
Ci
ai
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
E N ai
) Ci
RT i 1
(2.28)
Rate of reaction
Pre-exponential factor
Absolute temperature
Activation energy
Universal gas constant
Number of components in the reaction
Concentration of component i
The stoichiometric coefficient of component I in the reaction
2.8 2.28
kj
nj
Ej (/)
2.24
4.32E+13
0
13249
2.25
2.38E+17
0
29451
2.26
6480000
0
5072
2.27
1.34E+17
0
11497
14
2.3.3 (Diglycolamine, DGA)

2.7 H3O+
DGAH+ CO2 DGACOO-
2.11 DGA
2.3.3.1
DGA :
(2.29)
DGAH H 2O DGA H 3O
:
(2.30)
2H 2O H 3O OH
(2.31)
(2.32)
HCO3 H 2O H 3O CO3
:
DGACOO H 2O DGA HCO3
(2.33)
15
2.3.3.2
2.31 2.33 2.34 2.36

2.35 2.37
CO2 OH HCO3
(2.34)
HCO3 CO2 OH
(2.35)
DGA CO2 H 2O DGACOO H 3O
(2.36)
DGACOO H 3O DGA H 2O CO2
(2.37)
Aspen Plus 2.28 2.5

r kT n exp(
r
k
T
E
R
N
Ci
ai
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
E N ai
) Ci
RT i 1
(2.28)
Rate of reaction
Activation energy
2.9 2.28
kj
nj
Ej (/)
2.34
4.32E+13
0
13249
2.35
2.38E+17
0
29451
2.36
1.94E+15
0
15813
2.37
3E+26
0
25287
16
2.3.4 2--2--1- (2-Amino-2-metyl-1propanol, AMP)

2.8
H3O+ AMPH+ CO2
2.12 AMP
2.3.4.1
:
(2.38)
2H 2O H 3O OH
(2.39)
(2.40)
HCO3 H 2O H 3O CO3
AMP :
(2.41)
AMPH H 2 O AMP H 3O
:
AMPCOO H 2 O AMP HCO3
(2.42)
17
2.3.4.2
2.39 2.41 2.43 2.45

2.44 2.46
CO2 OH HCO3
(2.43)
HCO3 CO2 OH
(2.44)
AMP CO2 H 2 O AMPCOO H 3O
(2.45)
AMPCOO H 3O AMP H 2 O CO2
(2.46)
Aspen Plus 2.28 2.6

r kT n exp(
r
k
T
E
R
N
Ci
ai
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
E N ai
) Ci
RT i 1
(2.28)
Rate of reaction
Activation energy
2.10 2.28
kj
nj
Ej (/)
2.43
4.32E+13
0
13249
2.44
2.38E+17
0
29451
2.45
1.00E+9
0
8202
2.46
1.52E+20
0
12693
18
2.4 Aspen plus

Aspen plus

Aspen plus

Aspen plus version 8.6
Aspen plus 2
1. Properties :
2. Simulation :
Aspen plus Properties tab
2.9
User Defined
2.13
19
2.10 Component ID
Alias Next

2.11
20

2.12
2.16 Molecule Editor

Methods
Methods 2.13
2.17 Methods Specification
21
Methods 2.13 Methods

Assistant 2.14

Methods 2.15
2.18 Methods Assistant
2.19 Methods
Properties tab
Simulation 2.16 3
1. Model Palette Model Unit
2. Main Flowsheet
3. Navigation Pane
Navigation Pane
Main Flow sheet

Model Palette
2.20 Simulation Mode
22
Aspen plus

2.17
Sensitivity analysis Support Center

2.21
23
2.5
Fashami (2006) [15] rate-based
90
MEA 30

40-50

13

Arachchige (2012) [13]
500
(rate-based) Aspen Plus
85

(MEA)
MEA (profile)

Naskar (2013) [9]

(stripper)

24
Lee (2013) [16]

E-NRTL
Aspen Plus

(MEA)
(DEA) 2- -2- -1- (AMP)
90 550
DEA MEA
Erfani (2015) [14] 18
E-NRTL
pH
MEA DGA MDEA DEA DIPA

DGA DGA MEA MEA

25
Simulation of CO2 emission from coal-fired power plants
Process simulation
(Aspen plus)
Absorber section
Economic analysis
Stripper section
3.22
2
1. Aspen plus
2.

Aspen plus (Absorber section)

(Stripper section)
(Removal efficiency) 90

26
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2 Aspen plus V8.6

3.1.3 Aspen plus
(Removal Efficiency)
3.1.4
90
99.5
3.1.5
3.1.6
3.2

Properties 2
(Methods) NRTL (ELECNRTL)
Aspen plus
3.2 2
(Absorber)
(Stripper)
(Absorber)
27
3.2 [17]
(FLUEGAS)
(LEANSOL) (ABSORBER)
()
(GASOUT)
(RICHOUT)

(RICHIN) (Stripper)
(PURECO2)
(LEANOUT)
(MAKEUP)

(Heat
integration) 3.3
90
40 1
2
3.1
28
3.3 Aspen plus

3.1
()
()
()
N2
CO2
O2
H 2S
Base case [17]

673.4
40
1.1
72.86
13.58
3.54
0.05
* [18]
747.1
45
1.013
85.38
14.62
-
* . .. 2551
Arachchige (2013) [17]
500
(rate-based) 3.2
(Base case)
1000

29

90 99.5
3.2
()
()
MEA (Base case)
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
40
25
30
60
30
2422
vary
vary
vary
vary
3.3
3.3 Rate-based [17]
Specification
Base case
Stripper
15
2 bar
Kettle
Partial-vapor
Flexipac, Koch, metal, 1Y
Absorber
Number of stages
15
Operating pressure
1 bar
Re-boiler
None
Condenser
None
Packing type
Mellapack, Sulzer,
Standard, 250Y
Packing height
20m
Packing diameter
15m
Mass transfer coefficient method [16] Bravo et al. (1985)
Interfacial area method [16]
Bravo et al. (1985)
Interfacial area factor
1.5
Heat transfer coefficient method
Chilton and Colbum
Holdup correlation [17]
Billet and Schultes (1993)
Model for film resistance
Discrxn for liquid film
Film for vapor film
Flow model
Mixed
18m
12m
Bravo et al. (1985)
Bravo et al. (1985)
2
Chilton and Colbum
Billet and Schultes (1993)
Discrxn for liquid film
Film for vapor film
Mixed
30

Aspen plus
(Sensitivity
analysis)

(Optimization)
(Sensitivity analysis)
90
99.5 3.4
3.4
Input parameters
Flow rate solvent (kg/s)
Absorber packing height (m)
Absorber packing diameter (m)
Stripper packing height (m)
Stripper packing diameter (m)
Stripper reflux ratio
Base case
2422
20
15
18
12
-
Range of the parameter varied

1000-5000
1-50
1-15
1-50
1-50
0.1-10
MEA

3.3

(Total Capital Investment, TCI)

31
3.4
3.4 (Total capital investment)
(Fixed capital investment) (equipment cost)
(Direct and indirect cost) (Working
capital investment)
3.3.1 (Total capital investment, TCI)
(Total capital investment, TCI) 2
(Fixed capital investment, FCI)
(Working capital
investment, WCI)
3.3.1.1 (Fixed Capital Investment, FCI)

(Fixed capital investment)

32
2 Manufacturing cost(Direct cost) Nonmanufacturing cost (Indirect cost) 3.5

Purchase equipment
CAPCOST

Purchase equipment
3.5
Component
Direct Costs
Purchased equipment
Purchased equipment installation
Instrumentation and controls (Installed)
Piping (Installed)
Electrical systems (Installed)
Buildings (including services)
Yard improvements
Service facilities (Installed)
Land
Total
Indirect Costs
Engineering and supervision
Construction expenses
Legal expenses
Contractors fee
Contingency
Total
Range of FCI (%)
Select FCI (%)
15-40
6-14
2-12
4-17
2-10
2-18
2-5
8-30
1-2
40
6
2
4
2
2
2
8
1
4-20
4-17
1-3
2-6
5-15
4
4
1
2
5
33
3.3.1.2 (Working capital investment, WC)

(Working capital investment, WC)
10-20%
10-20 15

15
3.6
Component
Fixed Capital Investment (FCI)
Working Capital (WC)
Total Capital Investment (TCI)
Range of TCI (%)

80-90
10-20
Select FCI (%)

85
15
100
3.3.2 Utility
Utility Economic analysis
Aspen Plus
34
2

4.1
()
3 Sensitivity Analysis

90% 4.1
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
500
1000
MEA 25
1500
2000
()
DEA 30
2500
3000
AMP 30
4.1
( DGA )
35
4.1 MEA
90 DEA AMP
91
()
()
4.2 4.3 MEA
90
89
88
87
86
12
14
16
18
()
20
91
90
89
88
87
86
11
()
12
13
14
()
15
()
8000
7900
7800
7700
7600
7500
7400
14
15
16
17
()
()
18
( CO2)
( CO2)
4.2 () ()
MEA
8800
8600
8400
8200
8000
7800
7600
7400
8
9
10
11
()
12
()
4.3 () ()
MEA
36

MEA
DEA AMP
3.4 4.1 4.2

4.1
()
()
MEA (Base case)
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
40
25
30
60
30
2422
1600
3125
1250
3750
MEA 40
MEA

25
DEA MEA
30
MEA MEA
DGA
60

37
AMP
4.2
4.2 CO2
Model
Capacity
CO2 in Flue gas (kg/s)
Constraints
CO2 removal efficiency 90%
Purity of CO2 99.5%
Rate of CO2 produce (kg/s)
Optimization results
Absorber
Packing height (m)
Packing diameter (m)
Stripper
Packing height (m)
Packing diameter (m)
Re-boiler duty (kJ/kg CO2)
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
136.4
158.4
158.4
158.4
158.4
90%
-
90%
99.9%
108.0
90%
99.5%
142.2
90%
99.5%
142.2
90.1%
99.5%
139.3
20
15
13
12
25
16
3
13
45.5
17
18
12
3560
18
12
7335
30
10
7030
9.5
3
7690
30
15
8990
Base case
DEA AMP

MEA DGA
MEA
40
25 DGA

DGA
38
MEA
4.3
4.3
()
37.85
0.38
122.33
0.70
58.15
0.01
108.57
0.19
40.28
0.53
MEA (Base case)

MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
MEA

DEA AMP DGA
347.5
350
Liquid
Vapor
345
Liquid
Vapor
345.0
342.5
340
340.0
Temperature K
()
()
Temperature K
335
330
325
320
337.5
335.0
332.5
330.0
327.5
315
325.0
310
305
322.5
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
Stage number from top pf the column
()
13
14
15
320.0
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12
Stage number from top of the column
()
13
14
15
39
345.0
350
Liquid
Vapor
345
Liquid
Vapor
342.5
340.0
337.5
Temperature K
335
()
Temperature K
()
340
330
325
335.0
332.5
330.0
327.5
325.0
320
322.5
315
310
320.0
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
()
13
14
15
317.5
5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12
13
14
15
()
4.4
() MEA () DEA () DGA () AMP
(profile)
4.1
MEA DEA AMP
DGA
350
40
4.2

4.2.1

4.4 4.7
4.4 MEA
Equipment No.
Capacity/Size
Material of
Operating pressure (barg)
construction
P-101
Powershaft = 234.3 kW
Discharge pressure = 2.43
Pump to heat
Centrifugal
P-102
Reflux pump
Centrifugal
E-101
Area = 29,000 m2
Tube-CS
Tube = 2.43
Heater
Shell and tube
Shell-CS
Shell = 2.43
BEM
E-102
Area = 14,090 m2
Tube-CS
Tube = 2.43
Stripper
Shell and tube
Shell-CS
Shell = 2.43
condenser
BEM
E-103
Area = 17,345 m2
Tube-CS
Tube = 7.60
Stripper
Shell and tube
Shell-CS
Shell = 4.73
Re-boiler
BKU
T-101
Diameter = 12.0 m
Vessel-CS
Column = 1.03
Absorber
Height = 17.4 m
15 packed stages
Packing height = 13 m
M107YB
T-102
Diameter = 12.0 m
Vessel-CS
Column = 2.43
Stripper
Height = 22.4 m
13 packed stages
M107YB
V-101
Diameter = 1.4 m
Vessel-CS
Vessel = 2.43
Reflux drum
Length = 4.0 m
Horizontal
41
4.5 DEA
Equipment No.
Capacity/Size
P-101
Pump to heat
Centrifugal
P-102
Reflux pump
Centrifugal
E-101
Area = 34,100 m2
Heater
Shell and tube
BEM
E-102
Area = 15,550 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
condenser
BEM
E-103
Area = 21,970 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
Re-boiler
BKU
T-101
Diameter = 16.0 m
Absorber
Height = 29.4 m
15 packed stages
T-102
Diameter = 10.0 m
Stripper
Height = 34.3 m
13 packed stages
V-101
Diameter = 1.5 m
Reflux drum
Length = 3.8 m
Horizontal
Material of
construction

Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 7.60
Shell = 4.73
Vessel-CS
Column = 1.03
M107YB
Vessel-CS
Column = 2.43
M107YB
Vessel-CS
Vessel = 2.43
42
4.6 DGA
Equipment No.
Capacity/Size
P-101
Pump to heat
Centrifugal
P-102
Reflux pump
Centrifugal
E-101
Area = 3,675 m2
Heater
Shell and tube
BEM
E-102
Area = 20,000 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
condenser
BEM
E-103
Area = 73,400 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
Re-boiler
BKU
T-101
Diameter = 13.2 m
Absorber
Height = 7.4 m
15 packed stages
T-102
Diameter = 3.1 m
Stripper
Height = 14.4 m
13 packed stages
V-101
Diameter = 1.7 m
Reflux drum
Length = 5.0 m
Horizontal
Material of
construction

Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 7.60
Shell = 4.73
Vessel-CS
Column = 1.03
M107YB
Vessel-CS
Column = 2.43
M107YB
Vessel-CS
Vessel = 2.43
43
4.7 AMP
Equipment No.
Capacity/Size
P-101
Pump to heat
Centrifugal
P-102
Reflux pump
Centrifugal
E-101
Area = 19,392 m2
Heater
Shell and tube
BEM
E-102
Area = 16,090 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
condenser
BEM
E-103
Area = 31,008 m2
Stripper
Shell and tube
Re-boiler
BKU
T-101
Diameter = 15.1 m
Absorber
Height = 34.3 m
15 packed stages
T-102
Diameter = 17.1 m
Stripper
Height = 49.8 m
13 packed stages
Packing height = 45.5
m
V-101
Diameter = 1.6 m
Reflux drum
Length = 4.0 m
Horizontal
Material of
construction

Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 2.43
Shell = 2.43
Tube-CS
Shell-CS
Tube = 7.60
Shell = 4.73
Vessel-CS
Column = 1.03
M107YB
Vessel-SS
Column = 2.43
M107YB
Vessel-CS
Vessel = 2.43
CAPCOST Bare
Module 4.8
44
4.8
Equipment
Unit
Pumps
P-101
P-102
Heat Exchangers E-101
E-102
E-103
Towers
T-101
T-102
Vessel
V-101
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
MEA
136,600
65,114
11,225,680
5,207,789
80,178,291
11,886,208
17,724,404
35,055
126,459,141
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Bare Module Cost

DEA
DGA
278,852 $
111,837
108,728 $
75,212
12,453,174 $ 12,286,267
5,683,315 $ 4,909,795
101,566,765 $ 233,477,708
37,026,610 $ 5,525,154
19,011,042 $
711,606
36,687 $
39,571
176,165,173 $ 257,137,149
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AMP
367,310
118,028
7,092,961
5,932,137
143,322,950
38,699,223
83,398,476
40,681
278,971,765

4.9 4.10
4.9
Component
Direct Costs
Purchased equipment
Piping (Installed)
Yard improvements
Land
Indirect Costs
Legal expenses
Contractors fee
Contingency
Range of FCI (%)
Select FCI (%)
15-40
6-14
2-12
4-17
2-10
2-18
2-5
8-30
1-2
40
6
2
4
2
2
2
8
1
4-20
4-17
1-3
2-6
5-15
4
4
1
2
5
45
4.10
Component
MEA
Estimate Cost ($)

DEA
DGA
AMP
Direct Costs
Purchased equipment
126,459,141 176,165,173 257,137,149 278,971,765
18,968,871 26,424,776 38,570,572 41,845,765
6,322,957
6,322,957 12,856,857 13,948,588
Piping (Installed)
12,645,914 12,645,914 25,713,715 27,897,176
6,322,957
6,322,957 12,856,857 13,948,588
6,322,957
6,322,957 12,856,857 13,948,588
Yard improvements
6,322,957
6,322,957 12,856,857 13,948,588
25,291,828 25,291,828 51,427,430 55,794,353
Land
3,161,479
3,161,479 6,428,429 6,974,294
Total
211,819,062 268,980,998 430,704,725 467,277,706
Indirect Costs
12,645,914 17,616,517 25,713,715 27,897,176
12,645,914 17,616,517 25,713,715 27,897,176
Legal expenses
3,161,479
4,404,129 6,428,429 6,974,294
Contractors fee
6,322,957
8,808,259 12,856,857 13,948,588
Contingency
15,807,393 22,020,647 32,142,144 34,871,471
Total
50,583,657 70,466,069 102,854,860 111,588,706
Total
262,402,718 365,542,734 533,559,585 578,866,412

4.11
4.11
Component
Fixed Capital Investment (FCI)
Working Capital (WC)
Total Capital Investment (TCI)
Estimate Cost ($)

MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
262,402,718 365,542,734 533,559,585 578,866,412
46,306,362 64,507,541 94,157,574 102,152,896
308,709,081 430,050,275 627,717,159 681,019,308
46
250
x106 ($)
200
150
100
50
0
MEA
Pump
DEA
Exchanger
DGA
Tower
AMP
Vessels
x106 ($)
4.5
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
4.6
4.11
4.5 4.6

Kettle
DGA AMP
47
4.2.2 Utility
Utility DEA AMP
DEA AMP
AMP
4 DGA
DGA
()
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
100
()
4.7
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
MEA
DEA
DGA
AMP
4.8
48

Arachchige

MEA Aspen Plus

5.1
Aspen Plus MEA DEA DGA AMP
1.
2.
3. MEA
DEA AMP
4. MEA DGA
5. MEA
MEA

MEA
49
5.2
1. (Base case)
2.
50
[1] , ..2558-2579
(PDP2015), [], (2016). : www.eppo.go.th/power/PDP2015/PDP2015.pdf
[2] , (CO2)
. 2556, [], (2016). :
http://www.egat.co.th/images/egat-csr/csr-operation/EGAT_co2_emission_2013.pdf
[3] , Petromat today : Carbon capture,
[], (2016). :
http://www.petromat.org/home/petromat_today/petromat_today_vol08.pdf
[4] Rackley, S. A., Carbon capture from Power Generation, Carbon Capture and
Storage, pp. 66-93 (2010).
[5] , , [], (2016).
: http://www.eppo.go.th/coal/tech.html
[6] Rackley, S. A., Absorption capture systems, Carbon Capture and Storage, pp.
103-131 (2010).
[7] King, I., Svendsen, H. F., Heat of absorption of carbon dioxide in
monoethanoamine and 2-(aminoethyl) ethanolamine solutions, Industrial and
Engineering Chemistry Research, 46, pp. 5806-5809 (2007).
[8] Spliethoff, H., Power generation from fossil fuel, 1st ed. Springer, Berlin, (2010).
[9] Naskar, S., Jana, K., De, S., Comparative performance study of CO2 capture with
Monoethyl and Diethyl Amines using Aspen Plus, International Journal of Emerging
Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3 (3) pp. 490-497 (2013).
[10] Aboudheir, A. A., Kinetics, Modeling, and Simulation of Carbon Dioxide
Absorption into Highly Concentrated and Loaded Monoethanolamine Solutions, PhD
Thesis, University of Regina, Canada, (2002).
[11] Michael, A. D., A model of vapour-liquid equilibria for acid gas-alkanolaminewater systems, PhD Thesis, University of Texas, USA, (1989).
51
[12] Freguia, S., Modeling of CO2 removal from Flue Gas with Mono-ethanolamine,
Master Thesis, University of Texas, USA, (2002).
[13] Arachchige, U. S. P. R., Melaaen, M. C., Aspen plus simulation of CO2 removal
from coal and gas fired power plants, Energy Procedia, 23 pp. 391-399 (2012).
[14] Erfani, A., Boroojerdi, S., Dehghani, A., Simulation of an operational amine based
CO2 Capture at coal-fired power plants, Petroleum & Coal, 57 (1) pp.85-92 (2015).
[15] Fashami, S. Z., CO2 removal with 7M monoethanolamine (MEA) Aspen plus
model for base case, University of Texas at Austin, USA, (2006).
[16] Lee, A. S., Eslick, J. C., Miller, D. C., Kitchin, J. R., Comparisons of amine solvents
for post-combustion CO2 capture: A multi-objective analysis approach, International
Journal Greenhouse Gas Control, 18 pp. 68-74 (2013).
[17] Arachchige, U. S. P. R., Mohsin, M., Melaaen, M. C., Optimized CO2-flue gas
separation model for a coal fired power plant, International Journal Of Energy And
Environment, 4 (1) pp. 39-48 (2013).
[18] Jingjit, J., Chullabodhi, C., Study on Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Using
Amine Solvent from Coal-fired Power Plants in Thailand, Engineering Journal Chiang
Mai University, 20 (2) pp. 21-33 (2013).
52
1 : (MEA)
Component ID
MEA
H2O
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
MEAH+
MEACOON2
O2
CO
H2
H2S
HSS-2
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
MONOETHANOLAMINE
WATER
CARBON-DIOXIDE
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-MEA+
MEACOONITROGEN
OXYGEN
CARBON-MONOXIDE
HYDROGEN
HYDROGEN-SULFIDE
HSS--
Alias
C2H7NO
H2O
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
C2H8NO+
C3H6NO3N2
O2
CO
H2
H2S
HSS-2
2 : (DEA)
Component ID
H2O
DEA
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
DEAH+
DEACOOH2S
HS-
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
WATER
DIETHANOLAMINE
CARBON-DIOXIDE
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-DEA+
DEACOOHYDROGEN-SULFIDE
HS-
Alias
H2O
C4H11NO2-1
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
C4H12NO2+
C5H10NO4H2S
HS-
53
Component ID
S-2
N2
O2
CO
H2
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
S-NITROGEN
OXYGEN
CARBON-MONOXIDE
HYDROGEN
Alias
S-2
N2
O2
CO
H2
3 : (DGA)
Component ID
DGA
H2O
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
DGAH+
DGACOOH2S
HSS-2
CH4
N2
O2
CO
H2
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
DIGLYCOLAMINE
WATER
CARBON-DIOXIDE
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-DGA+
DGACOOHYDROGEN-SULFIDE
HSS-METHANE
NITROGEN
OXYGEN
CARBON-MONOXIDE
HYDROGEN
Alias
C4H11NO2-2
H2O
CO2
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
C4H12NOO+
C5H10NOO3H2S
HSS-2
CH4
N2
O2
CO
H2
4 : 2--2--1- (AMP)
Component ID
AMP
H2O
CO2
H2S
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
2-AMINO-2-METHYL-1-PROPANOL
WATER
CARBON-DIOXIDE
HYDROGEN-SULFIDE
Alias
C4H11NO-1
H2O
CO2
H2S
54
Component ID
AMPH+
AMPCOOH3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
HSS-2
N2
O2
CO
H2
Type
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Conventional
Component name
AMP+
AMPCOOH3O+
OHHCO3CO3-HSS-NITROGEN
OXYGEN
CARBON-MONOXIDE
HYDROGEN
Alias
C4H12NO+
C5H11NO3
H3O+
OHHCO3CO3-2
HSS-2
N2
O2
CO
H2
1 : MEA DEA
HeatX
Name
Hot side property method
Hot side Henry's component list ID
Hot side electrolyte chemistry ID
Hot side use true species approach for electrolytes
Hot side free-water phase properties method
Hot side water solubility method
Cold side property method
Cold side Henry's component list ID
Cold side electrolyte chemistry ID
Cold side use true species approach for electrolytes
Cold side free-water phase properties method
Cold side water solubility method
Exchanger specification
Units of exchanger specification
Minimum temperature approach [K]
Hot side outlet pressure [N/sqm]
Cold side outlet pressure [N/sqm]
MEA
HEATEX
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
MEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
MEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
113
C
1
0
0
DEA
HEATEX
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
110
C
1
0
0
55
HeatX
Name
Inlet hot stream temperature [K]
Inlet hot stream pressure [N/sqm]
Inlet hot stream vapor fraction
Outlet hot stream temperature [K]
Outlet hot stream pressure [N/sqm]
Outlet hot stream vapor fraction
Inlet cold stream temperature [K]
Inlet cold stream pressure [N/sqm]
Inlet cold stream vapor fraction
Outlet cold stream temperature [K]
Outlet cold stream pressure [N/sqm]
Outlet cold stream vapor fraction
Heat duty [Watt]
Calculated heat duty [Watt]
Required exchanger area [sqm]
Actual exchanger area [sqm]
Average U (Dirty) [Watt/sqm-K]
UA [J/sec-K]
LMTD (Corrected) [K]
LMTD correction factor
Number of shells in series
Total feed stream CO2e flow [kg/sec]
Total product stream CO2e flow [kg/sec]
Net stream CO2e production [kg/sec]
Utility CO2e production [kg/sec]
Total CO2e production [kg/sec]
MEA
HEATEX
396.21
200000
0
313.18
200000
0
308.35
237895.15
0
386.15
237895.15
0.01252
462112389
462112389
136338.31
136338.31
850.00
115887641
3.988
1
1
0.0241
14.35
14.33
0
14.33
DEA
HEATEX
396.17
200000
0
320.49
200000
0
318.95
237895.15
0
383.15
237895.15
0.01996
881513264
881513264
417851.39
417851.39
850
355173683
2.482
1
1
0.1244
51.38
51.25
0
51.25
56
2 : DGA AMP
HeatX
Name
Hot side property method
Hot side Henry's component list ID
Hot side electrolyte chemistry ID
Hot side use true species approach for electrolytes
Hot side free-water phase properties method
Hot side water solubility method
Cold side property method
Cold side Henry's component list ID
Cold side electrolyte chemistry ID
Cold side use true species approach for electrolytes
Cold side free-water phase properties method
Cold side water solubility method
Exchanger specification
Units of exchanger specification
Minimum temperature approach [K]
Hot side outlet pressure [N/sqm]
Cold side outlet pressure [N/sqm]
Inlet hot stream temperature [K]
Inlet hot stream pressure [N/sqm]
Inlet hot stream vapor fraction
Outlet hot stream temperature [K]
Outlet hot stream pressure [N/sqm]
Outlet hot stream vapor fraction
Inlet cold stream temperature [K]
Inlet cold stream pressure [N/sqm]
Inlet cold stream vapor fraction
Outlet cold stream temperature [K]
Outlet cold stream pressure [N/sqm]
Outlet cold stream vapor fraction
Heat duty [Watt]
Calculated heat duty [Watt]
Required exchanger area [sqm]
DGA
HEATEX
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DGA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DGA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
55
C
1
0
0
404.77
200000
0
328.15
200000
0
317.28
240000.00
0
386.08
240000
0.03923
281906906
281906906
39894.58
AMP
HEATEX
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
AMP
YES
STEAM-TA
3
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
AMP
YES
STEAM-TA
3
115
C
1
0
0
394.94
200000
0
332.63
200000
0
322.52
237895.15
0
388.15
237895.146
0.00010
897550110
897550110
127447.069
57
HeatX
Name
Actual exchanger area [sqm]
Average U (Dirty) [Watt/sqm-K]
UA [J/sec-K]
LMTD (Corrected) [K]
LMTD correction factor
Number of shells in series
DGA
HEATEX
39894.58
850.00
33910525.4
8.313
1
1
0.0596
37.60
37.54
0
37.54
AMP
HEATEX
127447.069
850
108330009
8.285
1
1
0.0531
1.45
1.40
0
1.40
3 : MEA DEA
Pump
Name
Property method
Henry's component list ID
Electrolyte chemistry ID
Use true species approach for electrolytes
Free-water phase properties method
Water solubility method
Specified pressure increase [psia]
Fluid power [Watt]
Calculated brake power [Watt]
Electricity [Watt]
Volumetric flow rate [cum/sec]
Calculated discharge pressure [N/sqm]
Calculated pressure change [N/sqm]
NPSH available [J/kg]
Head developed [J/kg]
Pump efficiency used
Net work required [Watt]
MEA
PUMP
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
MEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
20
201389.28
234343.43
234343.43
1.4605
237895.15
137895.15
12.18
124.33
0.8594
234343.43
DEA
PUMP
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
20
413388.91
481033.41
481033.41
2.9978
237895.15
137895.15
28.43
128.79
0.8594
481033.41
58
Pump
Name
MEA
PUMP
0.1016
0.0118
-0.0898
0
-0.0898
DEA
PUMP
0.1159
0.1242
0.0082
0
0.0082
4 : DGA AMP
Pump
Name
Property method
Specified pressure increase [psia]
Fluid power [Watt]
Calculated brake power [Watt]
Electricity [Watt]
Volumetric flow rate [cum/sec]
Calculated discharge pressure [N/sqm]
Calculated pressure change [N/sqm]
NPSH available [J/kg]
Head developed [J/kg]
Pump efficiency used
Net work required [Watt]
DGA
PUMP
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DGA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
1.4
155021.06
180387.78
180387.78
1.1073
240000.00
140000.00
14.08
120.68
0.8594
180387.78
0.0229
0.0229
-0.0001
0
-0.0001
AMP
PUMP
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
AMP
YES
STEAM-TA
3
20
524301.23
610094.77
610094.77
3.8022
237895.15
137895.15
11.19
136.09
0.8594
610094.77
0.2238
0.0451
-0.1787
0
-0.1787
59
5 : RadFrac MEA
RadFrac
Name
Property method
Number of stages
Condenser
Reboiler
Number of phases
Free-water
Top stage pressure [bar]
Specified reflux ratio
Specified distillate rate [kmol/sec]
Calculated molar reflux ratio
Calculated bottoms rate [kmol/sec]
Calculated boilup rate [kmol/sec]
Calculated distillate rate [kmol/sec]
Condenser / top stage temperature [K]
Condenser / top stage pressure [N/sqm]
Condenser / top stage heat duty [Watt]
Condenser / top stage reflux rate [kmol/sec]
Reboiler pressure [N/sqm]
Reboiler temperature [K]
Reboiler heat duty [Watt]
Basis for specified distillate to feed ratio
Basis for specified bottoms to feed ratio
MEA
ABSORBER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
MEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
NONE
NONE
2
NO
1
2.705
66.37
25.66
28.16
336.83
100000
0
76.17
100000
308.27
0
158.37
15.79
-142.58
0
-142.58
MOLE
MOLE
STRIPPER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
MEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
PARTIAL-V
KETTLE
2
NO
2
2
108
4.218
66.37
19.41
2.45
197.71
200000
-560005044
10.35
200000
396.21
792034317
14.35
108.00
93.65
0
93.65
MOLE
MOLE
60
RadFrac
Name
Basis for specified boilup ratio
Calculated molar boilup ratio
Calculated mass boilup ratio
MEA
ABSORBER
MOLE
0.4718
STRIPPER
MOLE
0.2925
0.2363
6 : RadFrac DEA
RadFrac
Name
Property method
Number of stages
Condenser
Reboiler
Number of phases
Free-water
DEA
ABSORBER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
NONE
NONE
2
NO
1
5.403
127.13
26.83
24.58
324.14
100000
0
132.84
100000
321.60
0
STRIPPER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DEA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
PARTIAL-V
KETTLE
2
NO
2
2
142.5
4.855
127.11
24.91
3.25
280.34
200000
-775414919
15.77
200000
396.17
999660773
61
RadFrac
Name
DEA
ABSORBER
158.37
15.88
-142.49
0
-142.49
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.2430
STRIPPER
51.38
142.18
90.80
0
90.80
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.1959
0.1463
7 : RadFrac DGA
RadFrac
Name
Property method
Number of stages
Condenser
Reboiler
Number of phases
Free-water
DGA
ABSORBER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DGA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
NONE
NONE
2
NO
1
1.316
28.90
25.02
27.36
STRIPPER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
DGA
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
PARTIAL-V
KETTLE
2
NO
2
2
143
4.811
28.86
26.69
3.27
62
RadFrac
Name
DGA
ABSORBER
330.67
100000
0
35.99
100000
317.24
0
158.37
15.83
-142.54
0
-142.54
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.5850
STRIPPER
294.64
200000
-760071140
15.75
200000
404.77
1093574390
37.60
142.26
104.66
0
104.66
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.9248
0.4266
8 : RadFrac AMP
RadFrac
Name
Property method
Number of stages
Condenser
Reboiler
Number of phases
Free-water
AMP
ABSORBER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
AMP
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
NONE
NONE
2
NO
STRIPPER
ELECNRTL
GLOBAL
AMP
YES
STEAM-TA
3
15
PARTIAL-V
KETTLE
2
NO
63
RadFrac
Name
AMP
ABSORBER
1
6.767
156.13
27.11
23.58
318.34
100000
0
159.55
100000
322.34
0
158.37
15.89
-142.48
0
-142.48
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.2035
STRIPPER
2
2.5
140
5.630
156.09
30.97
3.20
292.28
200000
-886805279
18.03
200000
394.94
1252889230
1.45
139.34
137.89
0
137.89
MOLE
MOLE
MOLE
0.1984
0.1612

Draft Project9.51

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Draft Project9.51

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

.

Simulation of CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants.

Mr. Veeraphat Hoontrakul Student id

Lecturer Nathapol Pintuyothin

Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn

.. 2558 2579 (PDP2015)

2.1.1 (Carbon Capture)

2.1.2 (Carbon Storage)

2.3.1 (Monoethanolamine MEA) 10

2.3.3 (Diglycolamine, DGA)

2.3.4 2--2--1- (AMP)

2.4 Aspen plus

3.3.1 (Total capital investment, TCI)

2.5 2.28 AMP

2.10 User-Defined Component Wizard

2.4 User-Defined Component Wizard

2.12 Molecule Editor

2.13 Methods Specification

2.14 Methods Assistant

2.16 Simulation Mode

3.3 Aspen plus

2.1 (Carbon Capture and Storage: CCS) [3]

2.7 (Post-Combustion) [6]

2.1.2 (Carbon Storage)

2.1.2.2 (Direct Storage) CO2

R-NH2 + CO2 + H2O R-NH3+ + HCO3- + heat (2.2)

(2.1) (2.2) (2.3)

R1R2R3-N + CO2 + H2O

(2.1) 0.5 1 2 (2.2)

Aspen Plus 2.18 2.3

2.3.2 (Diethanolamine DEA)

DEACOO H 2O DEA HCO3

2.20 2.22 2.24 2.26

Aspen Plus 2.28 2.4

2.3.3 (Diglycolamine, DGA)

2.31 2.33 2.34 2.36

DGA CO2 H 2O DGACOO H 3O

DGACOO H 3O DGA H 2O CO2

Aspen Plus 2.28 2.5

2.3.4 2--2--1- (2-Amino-2-metyl-1propanol, AMP)

2.39 2.41 2.43 2.45

AMP CO2 H 2 O AMPCOO H 3O

AMPCOO H 3O AMP H 2 O CO2

Aspen Plus 2.28 2.6

2.4 Aspen plus

2.14 User-Defined Component Wizard

2.15 User-Defined Component Wizard

2.16 Molecule Editor

2.17 Methods Specification

Methods 2.13 Methods

2.18 Methods Assistant

Main Flow sheet

Lee (2013) [16]

Simulation of CO2 emission from coal-fired power plants

Aspen plus (Absorber section)

3.1.2 Aspen plus V8.6

3.3 Aspen plus

Base case [17]

MEA (Base case)

Range of the parameter varied

3.3.1.1 (Fixed Capital Investment, FCI)

2 Manufacturing cost(Direct cost) Nonmanufacturing cost (Indirect cost) 3.5

Range of FCI (%)

Select FCI (%)