Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, P.O. Box 15875-4413, Tehran, Iran
Structures and Materials Laboratory, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5058, 2600 GB Delft, The Netherlands
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 20 April 2011
Received in revised form
18 May 2012
Accepted 21 May 2012
Available online 1 June 2012
Combining the suitable properties of metals and ber reinforced composites, as the idea behind the
application of new types of materials, called ber metal laminates (FMLs), have lead to superior impact
properties as well as considerable improvement in fatigue performance. The characteristics of FMLs
under impact loading and the ways to improve their properties to withstand this type of loading could be
of particular importance in aerospace structures and other applications. This paper reviews relevant
literature which deals with experimental evidence of material related and event related impact
resistance parameters as well as the articles related to theoretical and numerical simulation of impact
loading of FMLs. Relevant results will be discussed and the recommendations that need to be resolved in
the future will be addressed.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Fiber metal laminates
Impact
Low/high velocity
Experimental
Theoretical
1. Introduction
During the last decades the application of composite materials
in various structures has become increasingly popular. Especially
in aerospace structures, composites are preferred above conventional materials because of their advantages high specic strength/
stiffness and good fatigue resistance. Needs for improving material
properties resulted in hybrid materials built up from thin metal
sheets and ber-reinforced adhesives. Fiber-Metal Laminates
(FMLs) are composed of alternatively stacked metal and berreinforced composite layers (see Fig. 1), such that the superior
fatigue and fracture characteristics associated with berreinforced composite materials may be combined with the
plastic behaviour and durability offered by many metals [1]. The
development of the family of highly fatigue resistant FMLs, Arall
and Glare started in the 80s at the Delft University of Technology
[2e16]. These laminates consist of thin high- strength aluminium
alloy sheets (typically 0.3e0.5 mm thick) bonded together with
alternating unidirectional composite prepregs. The prepregs are
aramid or glass bers in an epoxy resin. Some major advantages
of FMLs are: high specic strength, better damage tolerance to
fatigue crack growth, re resistance, blunt notch strength,
formability, repairability, etc [5].
78
solved in the future are also addressed. While review articles and
even books on impact properties in conventional composites have
been published [23e25], the authors concluded that a detailed
review article on impact response of FMLs has not yet been published and that such an article should be of signicant value to the
FMLs research community and industry.
2. Experimental studies on impact response of FMLs
Fig. 1. A typical Fiber Metal Laminate [1].
Table 1
Glare Grades [5].
GLARE Grade
GLARE1
GLARE2A
GLARE2B
GLARE3
GLARE4A
GLARE4B
GLARE5
GLARE6A
GLARE6B
GLARE HSc
Prepreg layersa
Metal layers
Grade
Thickness
(mm)
Orientationb
Thickness
[mm]
7475-T761
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
2024-T3
7475-T761
0.3e0.4
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.2e0.5
0.3e0.4
0/0
0/0
90/90
0/90
0/90/0
90/0/90
0/90/90/0
45/-40.5
45/45
see
GLARE2e5
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.375
0.375
0.5
0.5
see
GLARE 2e5
a
The number of orientations in this column is equal to the number of unidirectional prepreg layers in each composite layer. The thickness corresponds to the total
thickness of a ber-epoxy layer in between two aluminum layers.
b
The (axial) rolling direction is dened as 0 , the transverse rolling direction is
dened as 90 .
c
High Strength (HS) GLARE has similar standard ber lay-ups as in GLARE2 to
GLARE5, but contains aluminum 7475-T761 and FM906 epoxy (instead of aluminum
2024-T3 and FM94 epoxy).
79
Table 2
Summary of experimental works on the impact resistance of FMLs.
Reference
Materials Tested
Type of Matrice
Type of Fibers
Type of Metals
Loading Rate
26
Arall1 Arall2
Ths
Ke
Al1-Al2
QS-LV
29
28
54
FGA
FGA
Glare 4 Glare 5
Ths
Ths
Ths
Gl
Gl
Gl
Al
Al2
Al2
LV
LV
LV
53
52
49
92
51
Glare3,4,5
Glare3,4,5
Glare 2,3
Glare
Glare1,2 Arall3
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl, Ke
Al2
Al2
Al2
Al3, Al4
Al5, Al2
LV
LV
LV
LV
LV
31
56
27
19
50
57
58
32
67
20
30
55
Glare1,2,3 Arall 3
Glare1,3,5 Arall2,1
Arall1,2 Glare2,3 Care
Arall2 Glare3
Glare3, Glare5
FML
FML
Glare, Arall
Glare,Arall
Glare,Arall
Arall,Glare
FML
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Thp
Thp
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Ths
Gl, Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl
Po
Po
Gl Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl, Ke
Gl
Al5,
Al1,
Al1,
Al1,
Al2
Al6
Al6
Al1,
Al1,
Al1,
Al1,
Al6
LV
LV, HV
LV, HV
LV, HV
LV, HV
LV
LV
LV
QS, LV, HV
QS, LV
LV
LV
22
21
47
48
60
FML
Glare5
FML
FML (sandwich)
FML Glare
Thp
Ths
Thp
Thp
Thp Ths
Gl
Gl
PP
Gl
PP Gl
Al2
Al2
Al6, Al2
Al2
Al6 Al2
HV
HV (Ballistic)
HV
HV
Blast
66
61
62
65
63
64
46
43
44
74
59
34
40
42
93
94
95
Glare3
FML
FML
FML
FML
FML
FML
FML
FML
Arall2
Glare
FML
FML
FML
Glare
Glare
Glare
Ths
Thp
Thp
Thp
Thp
Thp
Thp
Thp
Thp
Ths
Ths
Ths Thp
Thp
Thp
Ths
Ths
Ths
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Nylon 66LFT
Gl
Gl
Ke
Gl
Gr Gl
Gr
Gr Gl
Gl
Gl
Gl
Al2
Al2
Al6
Al6
Al6
Al6
Al2
Al6
Al6
Al2
Al2
Mg Al
Ti
Ti
Al2
Al2
Al2 Mg
Blast
Blast
Blast
Blast
Blast
Blast
LV
LV
Blast
QS, LV
LV, HV
LV
Charpy
LV, HV
LV
LV
LV
Al2
Al2
2
Al2, Al4
Al2
Al2
Al2
Al4
The abbreviation used are: Ths: thermoset, Thp: thermoplastic, Ke: Kevlar, Gl: glass, Gr: graphite, PP: polypropylene, Al1:Al7075-T6, Al2:Al2024-T3, Al3:Al7085-T7651,
Al4:Al7475-T761, Al5:Al7475-T6, Al6:Al2024-0, Mg: magnesium, Ti: titanium, QS: quasi-static, LV: low-velocity, HV: high-velocity.
drops and the contact between impactor and plate is ceased for
a short while. Duration of this time corresponds with the period of
the higher order vibration of the plate which can be observed at the
loading phase of the measured curves. At larger deections the
membrane reaction of the sheet will become important and
consequently the stiffness increases. The loading part of Aralls
forceetime curve shows uctuations caused by the vibration of the
specimen and the damage inside. After the maximum force, the
higher order vibration is absent. Therefore, for FMLs with ber
dominated failure behavior, like Arall, at low impact energies,
plastic deformation occurs and the aramid layers show some signs
of matrix cracking and splitting. This can be seen as uctuations on
the loading part of curve (Fig. 3).
For FMLs with aluminium dominated failure behavior, like Glare,
rst cracking in the outer aluminium layer at the non-impacted
side in the rolling direction is indicated by a sharp load drop.
After that, the discrete load drops indicate the delamination and
failure of the other layers. The deformation completes with the
80
Fig. 4. A typical contact force-time history for Glare under an impact with 4.0 J energy
[20].
Fig. 3. Contact force-time history for Arall specimen under an impact with1.47 J
energy [27].
Fig. 5. Infulence of ber type on quasi-static load-deection (2c 32: Caral, 2H32: Arall,
2R32: Glare) [27].
81
82
1
Glare3I (improved) is nowadays referred to as the Glare3 laminate with additional glass ber layers underneath the fuselage frames.
Fig. 7. Cross-sectional view of the Glare 5 (3/2) square specimens with various
stacking sequences under 40-J impact energy [93].
83
84
a sharp decrease of the load due to ber fracture, whereas for 45
and 90 bers, no difference has been recorded [49].
Two impactor geometries, i.e. hemispherical and at were
applied by Compston and Cantwell [22] for high-velocity impact on
polypropylene based FMLs. Both energy at the perforation
threshold and the specic perforation energy for the at nose
impactor are higher than for the hemispherical impactor. It should
be noted that, the mode of failure for the perforation of aluminium
sheet by hemispherical is associated with high plastic deformation
and tensile crack on the back side, whereas a disc-shaped plug out
caused by shear failure is visible after perforation with less plastic
deformation by at projectile resulted in lower perforation energy.
However, for FML specimens, the at nose projectile produces
larger fracture areas which cause more energy for perforation.
2.3.3. Loading rate
The effects of loading rate on the specic materials and event
parameters have been discussed in the corresponding sections.
i) Indentation versus impact loading
In general quasi-static loadedeection curves describe the lowvelocity impact behavior quite well. However, a signicant difference for central deection may occur between static indentation
and low-velocity impact. In terms of rst failure energy, Glare
needs more energy to produce rst ber failure during low-velocity
impact than under static conditions, but Arall requires less impact
energy to cause rst ber cracking than the similar static loading
situation [20].
ii) Low-velocity versus high-velocity impact
There is a limited amount of high-velocity impact investigations
reported on thermoset based FMLs [19,21,27,50,56,59] and thermoplastic based FMLs [22,42,47,48] compared to amount of articles
that concern low-velocity impact. They present considerable
results; some of them are as follows:
eDuring high-velocity impact, rst at lower impact energies,
the failure in the FML starts with a top surface dent and
a localized crack parallel to the rolling direction at the back
surface aluminium layer. By increasing the impact energy, the
length of the rear surface crack and the size of top surface dent
increase up to the stage of perforation threshold which usually
results in a clean hole and a limited petalling at the rear surface
of the FML. A thinning process around the point of impact occurs
due to membrane stretching and yielding in the aluminium
plies during impact.
eDuring low-velocity impact, transverse shear waves reach and
reect off the boundary of the laminate before perforation takes
place, whereas, if the effect of stress wave propagating throughthickness is neglected, two-dimensional transverse shear waves
propagate laterally until they are changed to bending and/or
membrane in high-velocity impact [21]. This fact has a great role
on the panel response to the impact. More localization and
limited global deformation of the panel are expected during
high-velocity impacts.
eThe proportions of the energy dissipating through a highvelocity impact on Glare have been estimated by Hoo Fat et al.
with their analytical model [21]. According to their results, the
deformation energy due to bending and membrane account for
84e92 % of the total absorbed energy, having in mind that
thinner panels absorb a higher percentage of deformation
than thicker panels. 2%e9% of the total energy absorbed is due
to the delamination energy with the fact that the thinner
85
Fig. 8. Photographs of a locally blast-loaded Glare 3 panel (4g PE4, 13 mm SOD) [66].
could not be found except for Vlots work [19,67]. He investigated the
aluminium alloys (2024-T3 and 7075-T6) and the corresponding
Arall3/2 specimens containing these alloys while the tensile stresses
applied to the specimens before impact varied between 0 and
350 MPa. In general he observed that the maximum central deections and the contact time decrease with increasing pre-load;
whereas maximum impact force increases during elastic impact
tests (lower energy). For higher impact energies (plastic impact
tests), the inuence of pre-tension on the force-time and
forceedisplacement curves of the Arall is higher than for aluminium.
With increasing the pre-stress, cracking takes place sooner and
a signicant rise in the crack length occurs at high pre-stresses. A
change in the shape of damage will be happened, cracks in the
specimens without pre-stress extend in ber direction, a lip is
formed in the material and then a hole is created in the laminate,
whereas, for the pre-stressed panel, the crack grows in the direction perpendicular to the bers and loading, during that the stress
concentration does not relieve with a negative inuence on the
residual strength [67].
3. Simulation of impact performance of FMLs
A systematic and step by step approach to the simulation of
impact behavior of the structures is to start from quasi-static
indentation followed by low-velocity impact and nally with
Fig. 9. Photographs of uniformly blast-loaded GLARE 3 panels (stand off distance D 200 mm) [66].
86
equations, assuming that deections are large, strains are nite, inplane deformations can be ignored, and that the strain energy can
be written in terms of transverse deections only. The main
difference with the explained previous work is related to the
assumption for the aluminium layer behavior, which is assumed to
be as rigid linear strain hardening instead of bilinear manner. They
incorporated a failure analysis in their model due to debonding
between the aluminium and glass/epoxy layers and delamination
within the glass/epoxy, by re-calculation of the bending and
membrane stiffness matrices for the panel. However, as the
membrane stretching resistance is much greater than bending
resistance and since debonding does not alter the membrane
stiffness of the panel, debonding has not a considerable effect on
the loadeindentation curve.
Damage initiation is modeled in a unidirectional FML under
concentrated loading conditions by Nam et al. [71]. They used nite
element model based on the rst order shear deformation theory
for modeling damage in UD FML.
Recently, Tsamasphyros and Bikakis in a couple of articles
[72,73], investigated the response of thin circular fully clamped
Glare plates loaded by a lateral hemispherical indentor located at
the center of the plate. They developed an analytical model for the
calculation of static loadeindentation curve and rst failure due to
composite tensile fracture applicable to circular plates. The material
behavior of aluminium was assumed as rigid perfectly plastic and
glass-epoxy as linear elastic. The Ritz method was employed in
their studies in association with appropriate approximation functions to satisfy the boundary conditions. The three- parameter Ritz
approximation that takes into account bending and membrane
stiffness of the plate has been shown to converge sufciently.
3.2. Low-velocity impact
A few studies have dealt with low-velocity impact modeling of
FMLs. Vlot [19,20] proposed two linear and non-linear elastic and
one non-linear elasto-plastic impact models for low-velocity
impact loading of FMLs.
First, he assumed a simple mass-spring system to model the
impact of mass mp with an impact velocity V0 to a clamped circular
specimen with a constant stiffness C and an equivalent massmeq . It
is assumed that contact between the impactor and the plate is
maintained during impact and the stiffness of plate is supposed to
be independent of the deection, i.e. it is constant. The strain
energy for pure bending can be written by assuming a prole for
bending of the plate. The equivalent mass of the plate can be
calculated by the kinetic energy relation, which for a circular plate
is about 0:13 mplate [20].
The solutions for plate deection, velocity, impact force and
contact time, can be obtained by solving the governing equation of
system easily. The comparison of the mean values of the measured
contact force was to correspond with the value calculated with this
simple mass model.
Subsequently, Vlot [20] assumed the contact between projectile
and plate by using the Hertzian contact law. The same approach
was applied by Sun et al. [74]. The plate was considered by two
springs in series: a non linear one with the Hertzian contact stiffness and a linear one with the bending stiffness of the plate.
Writing the total strain energy, kinetic energy and gravitational
energy of the plate and the impactor and using the conservation of
energy, conclude to:
87
Glare has been investigated in two phases, one before the glass/
epoxy breaks and another after breaking of glass/epoxy.
4. Finite element modeling
In spite of considerable efforts to develop efcient numerical
models for predicting impact damage in the composite laminates
[78e80], there are a few articles in the literature [81e87] that
report numerical modeling impact resistance of FMLs. Indeed, the
difculties associated with the phenomena of plasticity, crack
growth, delamination and perforation caused by impact loading
and the nature of loading rate, the modeling of FMLs is a bothersome work. The nite element should involve the continuum of
FMLs combined with interface elements where cracking and
delamination are located. It also should be capable of analyzing the
material models for anisotropic plasticity, crack and delamination
growth with suitable failure criteria and still it is imperative to
arrive at numerically stable and accurate algorithms [87].
Two well written studies [87,88], describe generally the
modeling and simulation of FMLs which are considered good
introductions to this type of analysis. Other articles modeled low
velocity impact problems on FMLs using the commercial nite
element codes ABAQUS [82e84] or LS-Dyna [81]. Laliberte et al. [81],
developed a user dened material subroutine in LS-Dyna for FMLs to
investigate damage mechanisms in Glare. Using tiebreak interfaces
to simulate delamination as well as selecting a type of hybrid solid
brick and thin shell elements called as thick-shells, resulted in
predicting absorbed energy, peak impact force and permanent dent
of the Glare laminates. Among the three types of interface models:
tied interface (with elasticeplastic aluminium, elastic prepregs),
simple-tie break (with the same mentioned behavior as previous)
and tiebreak (with elasticeplastic aluminium and damageable
prepregs), the last one was reported to provide better predictions.
However, through this modeling, it was shown that the formation of
interlaminar damage has a greater effect on the impact behavior of
Glare than the formation of delamination damage.
Recently, Seo et al. [83] used the commercial nite element code
ABAQUS to model Glare laminates subjected to different impact
energies. Hexahedral solid elements were used for aluminium
layers and depending on the nature of failure criteria and the
applicability of plane-stress assumption, the hexahedral solid or
shell elements were applied for the composite layers. The main
scope of their work is to introduce a three-dimensional progressive
damage model for composite materials and comparing the results
obtained by this model, the two-dimensional model built in ABAQUS and the case of no failure model. For two types of incident
energies, i.e. energy to create barely visible impact damage (BVID)
and the energy to create clear visible impact damage (CVID), it was
shown that both two and three dimensional failure models showed
good agreement with the experimental results, having in mind that
the three-dimensional model predicts the impact force and
permanent displacement more reasonable.
Low-velocity impact loading on FMLs was modeled by Fan et al.
[96] using ABAQUS/explicit. Cross-sections of the perforated FMLs
were predicted and compared with experimental data.
Song et al. [82] used ABAQUS to predict drop weight impact
response of CARAL as well.
Sadighi et al. [95] used ABAQUS to study low-velocity impact of
Glare 5/3 laminates. They concluded that for low velocity impact,
the shape of elements is more important than the type of failure
criteria. Using continuum shell elements for composite layers
cannot predict reliable results. Applying solid elements for both
types of layers within FMLs, leads to good predictions of impact
response compared to experimental results, even if incorrect failure
criterion is assumed for composite constituent of FMLs (see Fig. 10).
Fig. 10. Comparison of FE-predictions for two element types with the experimental
data as reference for 30-J impact energy on Glare 5 (3/2) panels [95].
88
References
[1] Remmers JC. Discontinuities in materials and structures: a unifying computational approach, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 2008.
[2] Marissen R, Vogelesang LB. Development of a new hybrid material: aramid
reinforced aluminium laminate (Arall), SAMPE Conference, Cannes; 1981.
[3] Gunnink JW, Voegelesang LB, Schijve J. Application of a new hybrid material
(Arall) in aircraft structures. In: Proceedings of the 13th Congress of the
International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS), Washington; 1982.
p. 990e1000.
[4] Marissen R. Mechanical aspects related to ber fracture in Arall-2 laminates.
Adv Fat Sci Tech 1989;159:697e703.
[5] Vlot A, Gunnink JW, editors. Fiber metal laminates e an introduction. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2001.
[6] Vlot A. Glare. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher; 2001.
89
90
[86] Karagiozova D, Langdon GS, .Nurick GN. Modeling the behavior of ber-metal
laminates subjected to localized blast loading, IUTAM Symposium on theoretical, modeling and computational aspects of Inelastic Media. Springer
Science Business Media B.V; 2008. pp. 319e328.
[87] F. Hashagen, Numerical analysis of failure mechanisms in ber-metal laminates, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1998.
[88] Linde P, Pleitner J, de Boer H, Carmone C. Modeling and simulation of bermetal laminates, ABAQUS Users Conference; 2004. Boston, Massachusetts.
[89] Moussavi Torshizi SE, Dariushi S, Sadighi M, Safarpour P. A study on tensile
properties of a novel ber metal laminates. Mater Sci Eng A 2010;527:
4920e5.
[90] Alderliesten R. On the development of hybrid material concepts for aircraft
structures. Recent Patents on Engineering 2009;3:25e38.
[91] Herrmann AS, Zahlen PC, Zuardy I. Sandwich structures technology in
commercial aviation, Sandwich structures 7: advancing with sandwich
structures and materials; 2005. pp. 13e26.
[92] Bagnoli F, Bernabei M, Gordan DF, Irving PE. The response of aluminium/Glare
hybrid materials to impact and to in-plane fatigue. Mater Sci Eng A 2009;523:
118e24.
[93] Seyed Yaghoubi A, Liu Y, Liaw B. Stacking sequence and geometrical effects on
low-velocity impact behaviors of Glare5 (3/2) ber-metal laminates.
J Thermoplastic Composite Mater 2012;25:223e47.
[94] Seyed Yaghoubi A, Liu Y, Liaw B. Low-velocity impact on Glare 5 ber-metal
laminates: inuences of specimen thickness and impactor mass. J Aerospace
Eng; 2012. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000134.
[95] Sadighi M, Parnanen T, Alderliesten RC, Sayeaftabi M, Benedictus R. Experimental and numerical investigation of metal type and thickness effects on the
impact resistance of ber-metal laminates. Appl Composite Mater; 2012.
doi:10.1007/s10443-011-9235-6.
[96] Fan J, Guan ZW, Cantwell WJ. Numerical modeling of perforation failure in
ber-metal laminates subjected to low velocity impact loading. Compos Struct
2011;93:2430e6.