Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anoop|Bikash|Kendraj|Nitin|Praneet
Company Background
MMI Product Placement
Established 1985, Pioneer of product
placement Canada
Over 2000 product placements to its
credit in feature films and TV episodes
Self proclaim mandate 3
Leveraged its relationship with Canadian
Entertainment industry built over years
Encourage makers of Film and TV shows
to incorporate clients Brands into their
production
Select Best
Placement
opportuniti
es for its
Clients
Core
Values
Negotiate
placement
contracts for
client
Brands
Offer Value
by
providing
extremely
attractive
CPM (Cost
per
thousand)
2
analyze each
one for
placement
opportunities
Potential Fit
Finding
inform client
and provide
details
help clients
product and
offer execution
support
Second Phase
Monitor and Track these product
placements
MMI had editing software to distribute scenes & Distribute via e-mail, CD Rom , DVD or VHS
Also had proprietary software to assess the impact of its placements for each client
Company facing growing competition from full service ad agencies
Ad agencies had set up product placement arm for providing client as one stop shop
Data
Collection
PQS
Value of
Placement
MMI collected data from AC Nielsen and Bureau of broad cast measurement (BBM)
People Meter to produce daily estimates of audience size and demographic characteristics for TV episodes
MMI had developed a proprietary Placement Quantifying Scale (PQS) for measuring value of each placement
Consider three variables to arrive at a number: cost of an equivalent 30 sec commercial, value or expected
impact of the on screen placement compared to 30 sec spot and possibility of multiple airings of the TV Episode
Value of placement= Cost of 30 s spot ($)*Placement Value (%)* Multiple airings factor (#)
PQS Model is only accurate as inputs you use. It is based on the quality of placement as perceived by
professional viewer.
Agency Structure
People Meter
measured three things:
tuning time of the TV set
channel tuned
number of people watching the channel
flaws in this technique:
sample size was very small (5000)
basically predicted based on assumptions
therefore lead to faulty conclusions
4
GREYHOUND CANADA
Canadas largest provider of intercity bus transport
Serving nearly 1100 locations across the country
An icon of bus travel, providing safe, enjoyable and
affordable travel to 6.5 million passengers each year
Market share 40%
Passengers used the service five times a year
Avg price paid for grey hound ticket was Cdn$ 45
Passengers used the service to commute to and
from work
32% earned over
Cdn$35000
Passenger Base
48 % had college
degree
Offer a group of amateur hockey players a second chance to realize their dreams by giving
them an opportunity to compete for a shot at making an NHL Team
Product
Placement
Frequency
Viewership
Transport these players to and fro from venue providing opportunity to integrate Greyhound bus into each episode
Schedule to premiur nationally on Global TV Network between sep 2006 to feb 2007; comprise 21 episodes
Alternatives Evaluation
Making the cut: Last Man Standing; Reality based TV Serial
Pros
Good exposure with serial of 21
episodes with 45 seconds total exposure
in each episode allowing the brand
image logo to be clearly viewed by the
audience.
Hockey is popular among the 18 to 44
age group and target audience is the 1824 year olds that Greyhound is aiming
for.
Show is scheduled on nationally
during the week-end prime time on the
Global television network.
The cost is desirable compared to
television commercial that is shorter.
Cons
Viewership data will not be available
until after the show aired.
Absence of track record means that
Hart could neither guarantee viewership
nor provide detailed audience
demographics.
The show is new and might not be
successful.
Greyhound may not like using a new
show.
Alternatives Evaluation
Placing Greyhound on hit show like Corner gas or Canadian Idol
Pros
Cons
Cost of 30-second spot($) Placement rating (%) Placement value ($) Viewership
14,000
100
21,000
1,150,000
10,000
100
15,000
1,425,000