=ATH PENALTY ARGUMENTS-h
AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY (CONS)
Death Penalty Fale to Rehabiltate
what would t accomplish ta put someane on death ow? The vietim is already dead-you cannot bring him back
‘When the opponents feel “fesr of death” wil prevent one from comantting urd, iis nat rue because mest murders are
one.on the “heat of passion” when a person cannot think rationally. Therefore, how can one even have time to think of
fear in reheat of passion (Intemen?
ACLU and murderers Penniless
“The American Chil Liberty Union (ACLU) is working for a moratorium on executions and to put on end to state
sanctioned murdarin the United States. They claim itis very disturbing to anyone vino values human Ife
In theamticle of the ACLU Evolumon Watch, the Americen ar Association sad the quailty of theles}
representation ie substantial. Ninety-rine peroent of ertrinal defendants end up penriless by the time their cage 18 up for
appeal. They claim they ate veated unfairly. Most murderers who de not have any maney, receive the death penalty
‘Those who lve in counties pro-death penally are more kayo receive tre death penalty. (temet)
Death Penalty Falled 2s a Deterrent
Some criminologist claim they have statistically proven that when an execution ic publiezed, more murders occur
in the day and weeks that folow. A good example sinthe Linbergkidnapping. A number of states adopted the desth
penalty for crime like this, but figures showed kidnapping increased. Publicity may
Jurage crime instead of preventing
i (eCiellan 1969).
Death Is one penalty which makes error ireversible and the chance of eiraris inescapable when based on human
|dgment. On the contrary, sometimes defersdants Fest on execution. They feel itis an act of kindness to them. The
argumenthereis- Ie fe imexiconmert 2 cueler fate? Is there evidence eupporting the usefulness ofthe death penalty
securing the life ofthe citizens (McClellan, G, 1961)?
Does the desth penalty give increased protection againat being murdered? This argument for continustion af the