Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emf PDF
Emf PDF
Room: 6.09.1
Email: andrew.wilkinson@uct.ac.za
Lecture Topics
Lectures will be given on aspects of the following topics:
1. Review of basic static field theory: electrostatics; Gauss law; magne-
tostatics: Gauss law for magnetic fields; Amperes (Oersteds) law
2. Dynamic laws: Faradays law of electromagnetic induction
3. Maxwells equations & displacement current
4. Electromagnetic boundary conditions
5. Relationship to circuit theory an Kirchhoffs laws
6. Radiation and electromagnetic Waves; the radiation mechanism; the
wave equation and solutions
7. Sinusoidal EM waves
8. Plane waves in (i) free space (ii) non conducting dielectrics; polarization
9. Simulation of propagating waves using FDTD method
10. Power flow in electromagnetic waves; electromagnetic safety consider-
ations
11. Reflection and refraction at boundaries
12. Propagation in conducting media and the skin effect
13. Radiation from antennas: Hertzian dipole, wire antennas
14. Thermal Radiation from warm objects
5
3 The Differential Forms of Maxwells Equations 3-1
3.1 The Static EM Equations in Integral and Differential Form . 3-3
3.2 Electromagnetic Equations before Maxwell . . . . . . . . . . 3-10
3.3 Continuity of Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-11
3.4 Fixing the Problem with Amperes Law . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-13
3.5 Maxwells Differential Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-14
3.6 Summary Table of Maxwells Equations . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-15
1-1
Predicting the behaviour of electronic circuits, particularly at higher
frequencies, where the dimensions of components approach the wave-
length.
Solving field problems, e.g. magnetic fields for the analysis of motors
and generators
In electrical impedance tomography, an image of object is reconstructed
from impedance measurements. These are obtained by injecting elec-
trical currents and measuring voltages around the boundary; the re-
construction algorithms require modelling the electric fields within the
medium under investigation.
2-1
1
where k = 40 is a constant. The permittivity constant 0 = 8.854 1012
Fm1
F Force on q2
R q1 q2
F= 40 r 2
R
R q2
q1
Note that the force is proportional to the charge values and inversely
proportional to r2.
The effect of such forces can be observed and measured.
We consider the force on q2 to be a result of placing q2 in the electric
field surrounding q1 .
If we place the points within a coordinate system at locations P~1 and P~2 ,
the force on charge q2 can be expressed in vector form as
q1 q2
F= R
40R2
where R = R is a unit vector in the direction of the vector R = P~1 + P~2 ,
|R|
pointing from q1 to q2 .
E1
q2
q3
Figure 2.2: Electric field at point P is the vector sum of components all sources.
B
r B
I
I
into page
V (into page)
B
Magnetic force
on moving charge
F = qV B
(down)
The units of B are deduced from the force per coulomb per unit of speed,
i.e. (NC1)/(ms1) = NC1m1s. For convenience the equivalent unit of
tesla T is commonly used (1 T = 1 NC1m1s).
The Biot-Savart law (1820) relates the current flowing in a wire to the
magnetic field resulting from it. Consider a linear homogeneous medium in
which a wire carries current.
Magnetic Field
(points out of page) B
P
I
r
dl
Homework
Use the Biot-Savart law to show by integration, that the field arising from an
I
infinitely long straight conductor carrying current I is B = 2R where R is
the perpendicular distance from the point of consideration to the conductor.
contour C
dl B
F
More generally, for solving dynamic fields problems, potential functions may also be defined. These
are known as retarded potentials and incorporate the wave propagating nature of electromagnetic
fields. Retarded potentials are functions of both position and time. It is often easier to solve a
problem (either analytically or numerically) by first solving for the potential functions, and then
subsequently calculating E and B field quantities. For example, the electric field is found from
A
E =
t
where (r, t) is the retarded electric potential function and A(r, t) is the retarded magnetic vector
potential.
Although we shall not analyse this here, the magnetic vector potential
A can be determined at any point in space r by integrating contributions
from all currents or current densities that exist, i.e. for the case of a current
carrying conductor (see Figure 2.5),
Z
I(r )dl
A(r) =
4R
where dl is the elemental section of wire at position r on the contour, and
R = |r r |.
For a distributed current density within volume V ,
Z
J(r )dV
A(r) =
V 4R
Once A(r) has been obtained, the B field is calculated from:
B=A
The introduction of the magnetic vector potential is useful for solving both
static B field problems as well as for finding the fields surrounding an an-
tenna.
q1 P1
P2
q2
P3
q3
It can be shown [Griffiths and other texts] that the work required to assemble
a configuration of point charges by moving charges from infinitely far apart
into fixed position, is given by
N
1X
W = i qi
2 i=1
where i is the potential at point Pi resulting from all other charges, exclud-
ing the i th charge itself2. More generally, to assemble a continuous charge
distribution (x, y, z) with corresponding potential field (x, y, z), is found
by integrating elemental volume contributions
Z
1
W = dV
2 all space
An important result is that this expression can be re-written purely in terms
of the electric field [Griffiths] to yield
Z
1
W = 0 E 2dV
2 all space
2
Note: i qi is the work done to bring qi from far away into position Pi against the force from all other
charges, i.e. i qi counts work against qj (j 6= i), but j qj counts work against qi (j 6= i). Thus the
PN
quantity i=1 i qi counts the work in positioning qi against qj twice (for each pair). Hence we must
PN
divide by two, giving W = 12 i=1 i qi .
I L R
It can be shown [Griffiths and other texts], that the work required to
establish the current is W = 12 LI 2, which in turn, can be expressed purely
in terms of the surrounding magnetic field arising from the current as
Z
1
W = B 2dV
20 all space
and thus we can consider the term 21 0 B 2 as the energy density in Jm3 and
can be thought of as the energy density in the magnetic field. This will have
some significance in our later discussion on radiating electromagnetic fields.
z z
Einduced
glass D(z)
air
Magnetic Domains
Insertion of a material into a magnetic field will modify the field. For
example, an electromagnet can be made by winding a coil around an iron
bar; the net effect of the presence of the iron bar is to boost the magnetic B
field strength, by a factor as much as 1000. To understand this phenomenon,
one must examine the microscopic structure of the material. The image in
Figure 2.10 [Ramo et al. 3rd ed. p 692] is a highly magnified picture of a
nickel crystal. The boundaries (revealed by an etching technique) shown are
local magnetic domains (typically 1010 to 1012 m3 in volume; or about 0.1-
0.5 mm in diameter) that have a net magnetic field. Under unmagnetized
conditions, the domains point in random directions. If an external magnetic
field is applied and increased with time, initially, the domains with directions
agreeing with the applied field enlarge, shifting the boundary walls of each
Figure 2.10: Ferromagnetic domains in nickel. [Ramo et al. 3rd ed. p 692]
Permanent Magnets
Subjecting an iron rod to a strong DC magnetic field causes the magnetic
domains to align with the applied field. If the applied field is reduced to
zero, the domains will tend to rotate back to their original positions, but
not entirely. The remaining or residual effect is a net magnetic polarization,
with a resulting magnetic field.
It should be noted that energy is required to rotate the domains. Some
of this energy is lost as heat, and some is stored in the magnetic field.
In a permanent magnet, the total magnetic field is the sum of contribu-
tions from magnetic fields generated by the electron current surrounding
individual atoms. The illustration below show two atoms within the mag-
netized material. The sum of many such current loops can be modelled as
a single current sheet circulating around the boundary of the material as
illustrated on the right (interior current contributions tend to cancel).
3
The applied H field can also be seen as the applied B field divided by 0 , i.e. H = Bapplied /0 . Thus
the total B is Binduced by rotation of domains + 0 H = H where = r 0 .
Tesla
saturation
1.5 slope
0
remanence
1.0 magnetisation Br
0.5 H c
H
linear region
slope 0
saturation r
BH curve for commercial iron used to make mains transformers [Grant & Phillips]
Example
Solution
By integrating to obtain the area enclosed by the S-curve, the energy loss per
cubic metre is found to be approximately 350 Jm3 in one cycle. The time-
averaged power loss in 1000 cm3 is therefore 50 350 1000 (0.01)3 = 17.5
watts (which is quite high). In practice, the iron core is not driven so far
into saturation, and the area (and power loss) is about 1/6 of the B-H curve
shown above.
b
n b
Dn q
+
closed surface S surrouding charge q.
dS
Note: There is one subtlety here: in matter, refers only to free charge i.e. charge that is free to
move or form a current. It excludes the surface charge on dielectrics induced by an electric fields.
The field surrounding a long line of charge of density l Cm1 can be esti-
mated by enclosing the line in an imaginary Gaussian cylinder, or radius r,
and length l. From symmetry,
H the electric field must point radially outwards.
Gauss law states: S D dS = Qenclosed. Ignoring the small contributions
of flux leaving the areas at the ends of the cylinder, Gauss law becomes
l
2rl Dr = l l from which we obtain Dr = 2r , or Er = 10 Dr = 02r
l
. Both
Dr and Er decay smoothly as a function of r.
Dr (r)
r
Er (r)
Note: If we placed the line of charge inside a long hollow cylinder of glass
(along its axis), keeping cylindrical symmetry in the problem, then we can
still apply Gausss law to establish the field quantities. In this new situation,
Dr remains unchanged (compared to the previous case) - the D flux passes
through the glass unaffected (it is normal to the glass surface). The Er field
however abruptly decreases on entering the glass (i.e. is discontinuous), i.e.
Er = Dr /(r) has a step change as it enters and then leaves the glass owing
to the step change in (r). This modified example emphasises why is is
better to view the D field as a flowing fluid and not the E field.
Figure 2.15: Illustration of Gauss law applied to a line charge within a cycilinder.
d
Gaussian surface
Area A
Figure 2.16: Deriving the electric field for a charged parallel plate capacitor.
Gaussian surface
(closed surface)
North
South
Figure 2.17: Illustration to show that magnetic field lines form continuous loops; hence any
line that enters a close surface must exit it.
dS
Integration
direction
Figure 2.18: Illustration showing the direction of integration when applying Faradays law
to an open surface with surface normal dS. The right hand rule applies.
This implies that for the case where t > 0 and uniform, the electric
M
field vectors point clockwise around the loop as illustrated for the pole
face of an electromagnet shown below.
TOP VIEW
E
Case of uniform (changing) E
magnetic field piercing
through flat circular area
e.g. on the pole face of M
an electromagnet. t >0
E
E(r)
Emax
r 1/r
i(t)
Increasing
r
rmax
Figure 2.19: Induced E-field vectors surrounding the pole face of an electromagnet for the
case where the magnetic field is increasing in the direction shown. Note:
although the B-lines must eventually curl back and form continuous loops, we
can regard the flux density for r > rmax as negligible.
H
In electrostatics, E dl = 0 indicating the conservative nature of
electrostatic fields and the fact that the net energy required to move a
test charge around a loop is zero. In general, electric fields are NOT
conservative.
The effect of the induced E field loop can be measured by inserting a
wire ring into a changing magnetic field and observing that a current
flows as a result of the induced electric field pushing the electrons
round the circuit. Note: current density J = E inside/on wire.
Recall
M
J = E t
>0
Vinduced
I= Rwire
Figure 2.20: Current flows in a wire ring placed on the pole face.
If the ring is broken by a small cut, the net effect is that the charges
pile up on either side of the cut, resulting in a local concentration of
electric field as illustrated below.
E=0
inside conductor
M
t
>0
Figure 2.21: Top view of a wire ring with an air gap. Note: the field inside the metal is zero.
Thus he field from the induced dipole must exactly cancel the Faraday-induced
electric field within the metal - try to draw the two fields.
B V
E=0
inside conductor
M
t
>0 M
>0
t
V voltmeter
M
Vmeasured = t
Figure 2.22: Wire ring with voltmeter placed in different positions. Are the readings the
same?
Figure 2.23: Illustration showing how Amperes static law yields inconsistant results, de-
pending on the definition of the surface S.
which implies
I
H= .
2r
Figure 2.24: The magnetic field ring exists both in the region around the conducting wire,
and also around the displacement current in the gap between the plates.
3. Faradays law I Z
d
E dl = B dS
dt S
4. Amperes (modified) law
I Z Z
d
H dl = J dS + D dS
S dt S
In this chapter, we shall show how a set of differential equations can be
derived from Maxwells four equations. These are known as the differential
formsand serve to describe field properties at a point in space and time; this
contrasts with the integral forms, which concern integrals along contours,
over surfaces and over volumes. Both the static laws and the dynamic laws
will be examined. Particulary, we shall also show how the displacement
current term introduced by Maxwell can be derived by consideration of the
differential forms.
The differential forms are found by applying two theorems from vector
calculus that apply to any vector field F = F(x, y, x, t) at any point in
space and time:
3-1
Gauss Divergence Theorem
For any (differentiable) vector field F, and any closed surface S defined in
space enclosing a volume V ,
I Z
F dS = F dV
S V
1
where F = div F is the divergence of the vector defined as
H
F dS
div F = limV 0
V
H
where the quantity F dS is the net flux leaving volume V .
The divergence theorem alows one to express a surface integral (over a
closed surface) as a volume integral.
The physical
R interpretation of the term on the right hand side of the
thereom V F dV is that we are summing up, for each elemental volume
P
dVi within V , the quantity H F dVi , i.e. we are calculating i F dVi .
The quantity F dVi = Si F dS is the flux leaving a volume element dVi
through its surrounding closed surface Si . The flux contributions through
the side walls of adjacent dV s cancel, leaving only the contributions through
theHside walls touching
H the outerRsurface S of the volume V , which we write
as S F dS. Hence S F dS = V F dV .
D=
B=0
E=0
H=J
These differential forms are used to solve for field distributions in static
situations. Like all differential equations, the solutions require the specifi-
cation of boundary conditions.
(E) = = 0
= 0
Example 2
3
Tomography refers to a method by which an image of the interior of an object is obtained via measure-
ments taken around the boundary. Tomography can be implemented via the injection and measurement
of EM waves such as X-rays or microwaves, or using ultra-sound, or via low frequency impedance meth-
ods. The word tomography comes from the Greek words tomos which means part or section,
and the word graphein (to write). In some types of tomography (e.g. X-ray tomography), the image
is made up of slices taken at different angles and combined using an algorithm.
v1 v3
I J v4 Measure voltages
v4 v5
v8 between pairs
Inject
current
v7 v5
I
v6
Figure 3.1: Illustration of current injection in electrical resistance tomography (ERT). Volt-
age measurements are made between pairs of electrodes.
Stated mathematically, the goal is to find the distribution (x, y, z), de-
scribed by a set of parameters {} , which minimizes a cost function C({})
derived sum of the squares of the difference, i.e. minimise as a function of
{},
XN
C({}) = (Vpred. (n, {}) Vmeas.(n))2
n=1
where Vmeas. (n) is the nth voltage measurement, and Vpred. (n, {}) is the
voltage predicted by a simulator. In practice, a smoothness constraint on
(x, y, z) is usually applied as well. Minimizing C({}) is a multi-variable
optimization problem for which iterative solutions have been developed.
The forward model is a partial differential equation that must be solved
numerically to get . To construct the differential equation to be solved, we
start with the continuity equation4, J = 0, and substitute the relations
J = E and E = . The resulting differential equation is = 0.
For the special case where (x, y, z) = constant, the equation reduces to
Laplaces equation = 2 = 0.
The value of the (x, y, z) on the boundary electrodes provides the values
required to predict the measurements Vpred. (n, {}) in the cost function
given above.
4
Explained
H in aRlater section. J = 0 is the differential form of the continuity of charge relationship
S J dS = V t dV , which describes the flow of charge within a conducting medium.
One can also extract other parameters of interest from the simulated po-
tential function, for example the electric field can be found by differentiation,
since E = . The current distribution can also be found via J = E.
This is all implemented using discrete approximations to the derivatives.
Example 3
Thus Z Z
JdV = dV
V V t
Since this must hold for any chosen closed surface S containing volume V ,
we conclude that
J=
t
This is the differential form of the continuity of charge equation.
J
If dQ/dt < 0
then there is a
Charge
net current leaving
S
flowing out
dQ/dt<0
Figure 3.4: The continuity of charge equation implies that the rate at which charge leaves
a closed surface equals (minus) the rate of change of the total charge within
the enclosed volume.
H=J
we get
( H) = J
which would imply that J = 0. This clearly is not consistent with the
continuity equation J =
t , and so we must conclude that H 6= J
in general, although we know it holds for certain measurable cases (e.g.
magnetic field surrounding a conductor).
To fix the problem, we try adding a new term T, and see what we come
up with - i.e. let
H=J+T
Taking the divergence on both sides, and applying again our vector identity,
we get
0=J+T
Rearranging and substituting the continuity equation we get
T = J =
t
Noticing that we can substitute D = , we see
D D
T= = =
t t t
Mathematically,
D
+k T=
t
where k is a constant, satisfies the equality. The integration constant
does however not model anything physical5 and so, T = D t as introduced
5 D
For example, if k 6= 0, then it would suggest that H = k 6= 0 even when J = 0 and t = 0. Until
something is observed physically, the constant is zero.
The units of D
t
must be the same as the conduction current J, being
Am , although D
2
t does not refer to any physical movement of charge.
giving I Z Z
D
H dl = J dS + dS
S S t
Auxiliary equations:
F = qE + qv B
D = E
B = H
J = E
4-1
Medium 1
E1 En1
Et2
Et1
En2 E2 Medium 2
Figure 4.1: Normal and tangential components of the electric field on either side of the
interface between two media.
and I Z
D dS = dV
V
which will allow us to relate the tangential and normal components of E on
either side of the boundary. Note that refers to the free, unbound change
within V , i.e. it excludes the charge bound to atoms.
Normal Component of D
The boundary condition for the normal component of the electric field can
be obtained by applying Gausss flux law
I Z
D dS = dV
V
to a small pill-box, positioned such that the boundary sits between its
upper and lower surfaces as shown in the illustration.
111111
000000
s 000000
111111
000000
111111
000000
111111 h
000000
111111
Surface charge
s dS =
n s
Medium 2 2 , 2 , 2
Figure 4.2: Gaussian pill box straddling the interface between two media.
where Dn1 and Dn2 are the normal components of the flux density vector
immediately on either side of the boundary in mediums 1 and 2, and s is
the elemental surface area.
The amount of charge enclosed as h 0 depends on whether there
exists a layer of charge on the surface (i.e. an infinitesimally thin layer of
charge)1. If a surface charge layer exists then
Z
dV = s s
V
and thus
Dn1 s Dn2s = s s
1
In perfect conductors, any excess free charge always resides on the surface of the conductor and is
denoted by s in units of Cm2 . Within the conductor, the charge density very rapidly goes to zero -
this is discussed in a later section on relaxation time.
It should also be noted that in the case of dielectrics subjected to an electric field, the material
polarizes, which does in fact result in a surface charge layer - however this charged layer is bound
charge caused by the polarization effect, and is not part of the quantity s .
Tangential Component of E
2 , 2 , 2
d
c
Medium 2
E2
Figure 4.3: To determine the boundary condition on the tangential component of the E
field, Faradays law is applied to rectangular loop straddling the interface be-
tween two media.
Et1 Et2 = 0
or
Et1 = Et2
i.e. tangential components immediately on either side of a boundary are
equal.
Bt2
Bt1
Bn2
B2 Medium 2
Figure 4.4: Normal and tangential components the B field on either side of an interface.
The boundary condition for the normal component of the magnetic field
can be obtained by applying Gausss flux law
I
B dS = 0
to a small pill-box.
If we shrink the side wall h to zero, all magnetic flux leaves/enters the
pill-box through the top two surfaces,
I
B dS B1 n s + B2 (
n) s = Bn1s Bn2s
2 , 2 , 2
d
c
Medium 2
H2
Figure 4.5: To determine the boundary condition on the tangential component of the H
field, Amperes law is applied to rectangular loop straddling the interface be-
tween two media.
B1 Medium 1
E1 En1 Bn1
Bt2 1 , 1 , l
Et2
Et1 Bt1
En2 Bn2 2 , 2 , 2
E2 B2 Medium 2
Figure 4.6: Normal and tangential components illustrated for the cases of the E field and
the B field.
Dn1 Dn2 = s
Et1 Et2 = 0
Bn1 Bn2 = 0
Ht1 Ht2 = Js
The boundary conditions can be expressed in vector form2 as:
D2 n
D1 n = s
E1 n
n E2 = 0
2
These vector forms require careful 3-D visualization. Taking the cross product between the surface
E1 extracts the tangential component (as a vector) .
normal and a vector, say n
(H1 H2) = Js
n
These general conditions can be further refined depending on the specific
media on either side of the interface. Some examples are given below.
Et1 = Et2
Bn1 = Bn2
1 1
Ht1 = Ht2 or Bt1 = Bt2
1 2
An example of a dielectric-dielectric interface is the interface between
air and glass.
The above boundary conditions are applied when analysing the reflec-
tion and refraction of plane waves (studied in a later section).
GLASS E2 =?
2 = 50, 2
Medium 2
E1
Medium 1
En1
AIR
1 = 0
En2
E2 Et2 = Et1
GLASS
2 = 50 , 2
Medium 2
Figure 4.8: E1 and E2 field at the the interface between two dielectrics.
Rod moving v E
through uniform vB
magnetic field
As the dipole forms, an electric field builds up until the internal forces balance, i.e. qE = qv B,
and the electron current no longer flows. The internal field strength is E = v B. If the rod is
orientated in the direction of v B, then the potential difference between the ends of the moving rod
Rl
is = 0 E dl = vBl where l is the length of the rod. In cases where a metal object is stationary
within the frame of reference, the electrons will rearrange rapidly (if placed in an EM field) such that
the internal electric field goes to zero; the potential difference between any two points on the conductor
will also then be zero.
E2 = 0
B2 = 0 2 , 2 , 2 = inf
(AC fields) Medium 2
Perfect conductor
Figure 4.9: E field and the B field at the interface between air and a perfect conductor.
H1 = Js
n
These boundary conditions are useful for establishing, for example, the
charge density or current distribution on the surface of a conductor,
when the field quantifies in the dielectric are known or specified.
These boundary conditions will be applied when analysing the reflec-
tion of an electromagnetic plane wave off the surface of a perfect con-
ductor.
Jn1 = Jn2
s
+ t Js =
(J1 J2 ) n
t
where t is the two-variable divergence in the tangent plane applied to the
surface current Js , and
t is the rate of change of surface charge density in
s
Jn1 = J1 n
Medium 1
n
1 , 1 , l
Jn2 = J2 n
s 2 , 2 , 2
surface charge
Medium 2
Figure 4.10: Boundary condition for the normal component of J for conductors (for the
non-steady state case for which there may be charge build-up at the interface).
5-1
with wires of finite width, a resistor as a rod of carbon, an inductor as a
coiled wire, and the capacitor as a pair of metal plates. We shall examine
briefly each lumped component model from a field theory perspective.
1 2
I(t)
R 2
1
L
V(t)
3
0
0 3
C
1 2
I(t) R
1 L
2
V(t)
3
0 Coil
0 3
Figure 5.1: Circuit diagram showing component symbols (above) and a more physical de-
piction of the components (below).
5.1 Resistors
A resistor can be constructed from a resistive material of conductivity ,
length l and cross-sectional area A, as depicted below.
Figure 5.2: Resistor made from a cylinder of carbon. A current flows as a consequence of
the (axial component) of the electric field.
Area A 1
0 E J = E
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1 e Path of an accelerating
0
1 electron, which collides
Average drive velocity with atoms.
of the electrons
Figure 5.3: The electrons accelerate, but are impeded by the atomic structure, hence reach-
ing a finite (average) terminal velocity. An imagined path of a single electron
is shown.
Because of the high density of electrons, the average drift speed is sur-
prisingly slow. For example, Halliday, Resnick & Walker 6th Ed, do an
example calculation (Problem 27.3) in which the drift velocity with a cop-
per wire or radius 0.9 mm, carrying a current of 17 mA, is calculated to be
4.9 107m/s or 1.8 mm/hr.
To determine dQ
dx
, consider a wire segment of length dx, and of thickness 2r.
The volume of the segment is r2 dx. The number of coulombs per metre is
dQ (charge/vol) vol (e qe )(r2dx)
= = = e qer2
dx length dx
and hence
I
vdrif t =
e qe r2
For copper wire of 1 mm thickness,
dQ
= e qe r2 = 8.5 1028 (1.6 1019) 3.14 (0.5 103)2 = 10676 Cm1
dx
If a current of I = 1 ampere flows in the wire, the electron drift velocity is
I 1 [Cs1 ] 5 1
vdrif t = 2
= 1 = 9.37 10 ms = 34 cm/hr.
e qe r 10676 [Cm ]
The number of electrons making up one coulomb is 1/ |qe | = 6.25 1018.
Thus for a 1 ampere current, 6.25 1018 electrons pass per second.
5.2 Capacitors
Consider a parallel plate capacitor. As the current flows through the wires,
a surface charge builds up on the inner sides of the capacitors plates.
where Q0 is the initial charge at some starting time t0 . The other plate will
have a charge of Q(t).
A potential difference builds up between the places. The potential differ-
ence can be shown by careful argument [Griffiths] to be proportional to the
charge Q on the plates, i.e.
1
Vc (t) = Q(t)
C
where C is the constant known as the capacitance.
Substituting for Q(t), we get
Z
1 t Q0
Vc (t) = I(t)dt +
C t0 C
In the circuit loop, V03 = V0 V3 = Vc (t).
5.3 Inductors
Inductors are made by winding several turns of wire either in air, or around
some high permeability material (which boosts the inductance, requiring
fewer turns).
We shall explain the operation of an inductor by considering first a single
turn, and then a coil of several turns, in the context of the series circuit
under analysis.
As already discussed, we are interested in applying Faradays law around
the dashed loop shown in the physical circuit. For the inductor, we are
We can apply Faradays law locally to a closed contour C that goes clockwise
around the inside of the wire and then across the air gap (in the shape of
the dotted path),
I Z Z Z
d dM
E dl = E dl + E dl = B dS =
C (air) (wire) dt S dt
where and dS points into the page, and M is the flux threading the inte-
gration loop (and cutting a chosen surface S, bounded by C).
Since E = 0 in the wire, the potential difference is then
Z Z
d
V = E dl = B dS
(air) dt S
The magnetic field B is linearly
R proportional to the current I flowing in the
2
wire , i.e. B I, and so is S B dS I. The constant of proportionality
2
The magnetic field vector owing to a short current segment can be computed using the Biot-Savart
law (reviewed in Section 2.5). The total field is found by integration of all contributions from current
elements in the wire.
V1
The voltage drop across the terminals is the line integral along the dashed
line:
Z +
V = E dl
Z Z Z
= [ E dl + E dl + ... E dl]
gap1 gap2 gapN
= V1 + V2 + ...VN
3
The units of inductance are equivalently [H] = [Wb A1 ] = [VA1 s1 ] = [VCs2 ] = [NC1 mCs2 ] =
[Nms2 ].
Alternative Explanation
Analysis of a multi-turn coil is similar to the case of a single turn coil, with
the added complication that the integration contour C is not a circle, but
rather made up of a spiral that follows the wire (and a short section in the
air gap between its terminals). As argued for a single turn case, the voltage
across the terminals is
Z Z
d
V = E dl = B dS
(air) dt S
where surface S is now a complicated-to-visualise surface that is bounded
by the contour C. It helps to imagine the surface within the coil as a smooth
L = N 2 L1turn
where L1turn is the inductance of a single turn coil of the same radius. To
see this, one must grasp two points:
the spiral surface S through with the flux lines pass consists of a stack
of N identical contributing flattish discs (the total surface area is
approximately N times larger than for a single turn)
the flux density on each component disc is N times stronger than the
flux density generated by a single turn (superposition of contributions
from N turns, each carrying current I)
Thus the total flux threading
Z the surface of the multi-turn contour is
M = B dS N N 1turn
S
where 1turn is equal to the flux generated by a single turn coil carrying
current I.
The inductance of the multi-turn coil is then
M N 2 1turn
L= = = N 2 L1turn
I I
External field
in the surrounding
wire
air.
diameter wire 2a
r
2a
radius
of circle
Internal field
inside the metal
Example Calculation
4
At sufficiently low frequencies (kHz down to DC), the current density is fairly uniform across the cross
section of the wire. As the frequency increases from DC, the current tends to concentrate increasingly
towards the outside of the wire. This effect is known as the skin effect, and is discussed later in the
course.
Radius
For a short length-to-radius ratio coil such as that depicted in Figure 5.7,
the external inductance of an N turn coil is N 2 times that of a single turn,
i.e.
2 8r
L N 0 r[ln 2]
a
When winding a coil, it is useful to remember that the inductance is
proportional to the square of the number of turns. The inductance may be
increased by winding the coil on an iron or ferrite rod or on a toroid, which
has a relative permeability of hundreds or thousands that of air.
length l
I
B field
r
Radius
B ~ 0 outside
I
Outside the coil, the flux lines spread out, and H becomes negligibly small
compared to inside the coil. Consequently, we can also ignore the horizontal
segment of the integral on the outside of the coil. Thus
I
H dl H l
The inductance is the ratio of the total flux linking the coil to the current,
being
R
S B dS N N Br2 N (0 N I/l)r2 0 r2 N 2
L= = = =
I I I I l
V1 (t) V2 (t)
I1 (t) I2 (t)
Consider two coils in close proximity, one containing N1 turns, and the
other containing N2 turns. Although not shown in the sketch, these coils
are parts of circuits and carry currents.
R
1 2
I(t)
V21 L
1 2
V32
V(t) V10
3
V03
0 Coil
0 3
Figure 5.10: Series circuit loop - Faradays law is applied along the dotted line to derive
Kirchhoffs voltage law.
Since E 0 in the wires, the voltage drops around the circuit occur
across the components. Thus, we can write
I Z 1 Z 2 Z 3 Z 0 Z
B dM
Edl = Edl Edl Edl Edl = dS =
0 1 2 3 S t dt
or
dM
V10 + V21 + V32 + V03 =
dt
The flux threading the loop can be split into three contributions:
M = applied + self + mutual
where
For the complete model shown below, the equation in the form of Kirchhoffs
law is written as
Z
1 t dI dapplied dself dmutual
V (t) IR I(t)dt L =0
C t0 dt dt dt dt
or
N
X
Vi = 0
i=1
V (t) L
Lself
Figure 5.11: Circuit modified to incorporate an additional series inductor Lself which mod-
els the series inductance of the loop, and an additional voltage source which
models unwanted external signals.
d
The term dtself = Lself dI
dt resulting from the current in the loop, is mod-
elled by a (small) series inductance Lself . A feeling for the magnitude of
this self inductance can be gained by considering a circuit arranged in a
circular loop of radius 10 cm. We previously calculated the self inductance
of a wire ring of radius 10 cm and wire radius of 0.5 mm to be 0.7 H.
At an operating frequency of say 1 kHz, the AC reactance of this term
is XL = 2f Lself 4 103 ohms, which is usually small enough to be
neglected from calculations. At higher frequencies, this term may become
significant.
d
The term applied
dt
arises if the circuit is exposed to some externally gen-
erated AC field, e.g. a nearby transmitter like a cell phone, or perhaps a
motor, or close-by transformer. Usually this term can be neglected. Of
course radio waves are ever present, but their contribution is usually in-
6
A Faraday cage will provide good shielding from electric fields. DC or slowly varying magnetic fields
however do penetrate metal enclosures. e.g. the earths magnetic field is still detected by a magnetic
compass within a Faraday cage. The degree of penetration of time-varying AC electromagnetic fields
is a function of a frequency dependent parameter of the metal known as the skin depth, which will
be studied later in this course. For good shielding at a particular frequency, the enclosure wall should
be considerably thicker that the skin depth (at that frequency).
I2
I1
I3
b
n
closed surface S1
dS
I4
closed surface S2
Figure 5.12: The relationship between Kirchhoffs cuurent law at a node the continuity
equation.
7
It is worth noting that the total displacement current flowing
H out of a closed surface is equal to the time
rate of change of charge enclosed by the surface, i.e. Id = S D
t dS = dQ/dt.
Another way to look at the situation is to observe that the sum of all
currents, both conduction and displacement current, flowing out of a closed
surface is zero, i.e. for surface S2,
I1 + I2 + I3 + Id = 0
H
where Id = S D t dS is the displacement current leaving the surface. Id
is concentrated primarily between the plates of the capacitor (where the
electric field is strongest).
H D
Also, since we have shown that dQdt = S t dS = Id (for any closed surface),
dQ
and if the only significant dt within S2 is the charge build up on the inner
plate of the capacitor due to I4, then
dQ dQplate
Id = = I4
dt dt
which again for S2 implies
I1 + I2 + I3 + I4 0
8
Any excess charge must be the surface, because 0 very rapidly inside a metal conductor - see section
on relaxation time.
Rod moving v E
through uniform vB
magnetic field
There will also exist a potential difference between the end points of the rod, i.e. b a =
Rb Rb
a E dl = a (v B) dl. If v is perpendicular to B and the rod is orientated such that its length is
perpendicular to v and B, then the potential difference between the ends will be vBl.
J J = E
charges move
(t)
0
(x, y, z, t)
(t) = 0 e t
J 0.370
t
=
J
Figure 5.13: The illustration shows an initial charge distribution within a homogeneous
conducting medium. The charge will rearrange as time progresses, with the
charge density at any monitored point decaying over time.
Consider the charge within the conducting body. The movement of charge
will be governed by the continuity equation, for which the differential form
J=
t
10
Here we are ignoring the granularity of electrons and treating the charge as a kind of fluid.
V (t) dm /dt
V (t)
net dm /dt 0
Figure 5.14: Illustration comparing a straight wire transmission line with a twisted pair
transmission line.
Figure 5.15: Illustrations of capacitive coupling onto parallel wire transmission lines for the
case of balanced versus unbalanced driving circuitry.
Sometimes twisted pairs are also shielded (i.e. wrapped with an outer
braiding or foil sheath), offering increased immunity to electromagnetic in-
terference and noise. The shielding also further reduces radiation from the
cable itself. Several twisted pairs are sometimes bundled within the same
cable. The use of twisted pairs offers significantly lower cross talk between
data channels compared to non-twisted side-by-side wires within a cable.
Unshielded twisted pair (UTP) cable is now used for connecting standard
PCs in in-door local area networks (LANs). UTP network cables replaced
previously used 50 ohm coaxial cables for LANs because UTP cables are
cheaper to manufacture than coaxial cable, and offer adequate immunity
to electromagnetic interference. UTP network cable is typically used for
Cat-5e Cat-6
RJ-45 connector
Figure 5.17: Photos from from RS website; connector from Intel website
6-1
where D = E and B = H.
It is pointed out that this set, together with the Lorentz force law
F = qE + qV B
21 2f
f 2 2 = g(r, t)
v t
2 2 2
where 2 x2 + y 2 + z 2 is the Laplacian operator.
2f 1 2f
=0
z 2 v 2 t2
The solution known as dAlemberts solution is
z z
f (z, t) = f1 (t ) + f2 (t + )
v v
being the sum of forward and reverse propagating waves.
As an exercise, it is worth verifying the solution by expanding out the
2nd partial derivatives with respect to z and t and substiting into the wave
equation (do this yourself):
f z z
= f1(t ) + f2(t + )
t v v
2f z z
= f 1 (t ) + f 2 (t + )
t2 v v
2 2
Clearly zf2 = v12 2ft and f (z, t) is a solution to the wave equation.
In any physical problem, the solutions are constrained by the so called
boundary conditions. In the case of electromagnetic radiation, these are
the constraints on E, D, B and H at interfaces between different media, and
the constraint on the field quantities at the source of the radiation.
E = ( E) 2E
2
Ex
2
2 Ex 2 Ex
where 2E E = 2Ey , and 2 Ex = xE2x + y 2 + z 2
2 Ez
Lastly, we use Gauss law
E =
to write the 1st term on the right hand side as
( E) = = grad( )
2 2E J
E = 2
t t
or
2 2E J
E 2 =
t t
This is a vector form of the wave equation. For each Cartesian coordinate
2 2 Ex Jx
Ex 2 =
t t
2 2 Ey Jy
Ey 2 =
t t
2
Ez Jz
2Ez 2 =
t t
NOTE:
In free space, J = 0, and so all three components of E are of the
form
2 2 Ex
Ex 2 = 0
t
If we compare this equation to the standard form wave equation
2 1 2f
f 2 2 =0
v t
we identify v12 , and hence we conclude that electromagnetic waves
must propagate with velocity
1 1
v= = = 2.998 108 ms1
00 8.85 10 12 4 10 7
This is the same as the measured value for light, and hence sug-
gests that light is an electromagnetic wave - Maxwells great revelation
[around 1865]. At the time of Maxwell, this was an amazing result.
The constants 0 and 0 were purely the results of electrostatic and
SEE:
(1) HANDOUT OF ILLUSTRATIONS of EM Propagation [from book
on Antennas by J.D. Kraus]
Figure 6.2: a) Side view illustration of the E field propagating away from a dipole antenna
driven by a sinusoidal source. b) Top view illustration of the corresponding
B field propagating away from the dipole antanna. [images obtained from
simulation made available by Hsiu C Han of Iowa State University]
A short dipole anntena radiator can be constructed from two bits of wire.
Driving the dipole with a sinusoidal voltage source sets up time varying
currents in the two arms. The time varying current sets up a time-varying
electromagnetic field that propagates away from the source. A cross section
showing the E field at a particular time instant can be seen in Figure 6.2.
The radiation pattern can be used to depict the power density (W/m2) in
a polar format in a particular direction. For an accelerating charge, a cross
section of the pattern is shown below - the distance from the origin at a
particular angle represents the power density radiated in that direction.
Radiation pattern from accelerating charge
J
t
P owerDensity()
2 1 2f
f 2 2 = g(r, t)
v t
where f = f ((r, t)) is a function of position in space and time. The function
g(r, t) is used to model a radiation source. The constant v is the velocity of
propagation.
Away from the source, g(r, t) = 0 and the wave equation is written as
21 2f
f 2 2 =0
v t
The term 2f is called the Laplacian of f.
2
In 1-D spatial dimension denoted by z, 2 f = zf2 and the equation is
written as
2f 1 2f
= g(z, t)
z 2 v 2 t2
It is easy to show (by differentiation) that a solution to the 1-D wave equa-
tion is of the form
z z
f (z, t) = f1 (t ) + f2 (t + )
v v
or alternatively written as
1 1
f (z, t) = f1 ( (z vt)) + f2( (z + vt))
v v
= w1(z vt) + w2(z + vt)
x=0 x=L x
Figure 6.4: A plot of the displacement of the string as a function of position x (at some
given instant t in time).
2
As we shall see in a later section, the power density vector P = E H points in the direction of power
flow, and far from a source, the power density |P| r12 (in the so-called far field).
Figure 6.5: Forces on an element of the string; the magnitudes of the angles are exaggerated.
For a positive lateral displacement (i.e. f (x1|t) > 0) the value of F will be
negative, indicating a restoring force in the direction of strings rest position
being the x-axis.
According to Newtons 2nd law, the force equals mass times acceleration.
For the small section of length l, its mass m = wl wx since 1 and
2 are small angles. Thus Newtons 2nd law implies
f f 2f
F = T( ) = wx 2
x x1 +x x x1 t
or
f
( f
x x +x x x )
1 1
w 2f
=
x T t2
2
f
Taking the limit x 0, the left hand side becomes x ( x ) = xf2 , being
the second partial derivative evaluated at position x = x1. Thus we have
derived the standard form of the 1-D wave equation
2f w 2f
=
x2 T t2
which describes the lateral displacement of the string at any position x and
time t between its clamped endpoints. The propagation
q speed of the wave
(in the +x or x direction) is identified as v = wT .
How do we obtain a solution? dAlemberts solution, we know is a com-
plete solution of the form
and
f (x, t)
V0(x) = = vf1 (x) + vf2 (t)
t t=0
Differentiating the first equation, U0 (x) = f1 (x) + f2 (x) and substituting
f2 (x) = U0 (x) f1 (x) into the second, we get
V0 (x) = vf1 (x) + v(U0 (x) f1 (x)) = 2vf1 (x) + vU0 (x)
Rearranging
1 1
f1 (x) = U0 (x) V0 (x)
2 2v
and by integration we get
Z x
1 1
f1 (x) = U0(x) V0 (u)du k
2 2v 0
where k is a constant, and
Z x
1 1
f2(x) = U0(x) f1(x) = U0(x) + V0 (u)du + k
2 2v 0
U0 (x)
U0 (x)/2 Initial displacement
at t=0
No longer overlapping
Figure 6.6: The illustration shows an initial condition U0 (x). Releasing the string at t = 0
sets up two propagating waves that reflect off the clamped ends of the string.
There is an inversion on reflection (similar to an voltage wave travelling down
a transmission line and reflecting off a short circuit termination).
Example
= 2103kg m1
A guitar string has the following parameters: T = 100 N, w q
T
and L = 0.65 m. The speed of wave propagation is v = w = 224 ms1.
The fundamental frequency is
v 224
f= = = 172 Hz
2L 2 0.65
Tightning the string will increase speed of propagation and hence the fre-
quency.
3
One could imagine creating such an initial displacement using three drawing pins that are simultaneously
removed at time t = 0. A more realistic initial condition for a guitar string is a pluck made by a single
finger.
7-1
where Vrec () and Vtran () are the Fourier transforms of the transmitted
signal Vtran (t) and received signal Vrec (t). The time domain waveform Vrec (t)
found by inverse transforming Vrec ().
This motivates the detailed study of sinusoidal solutions to Maxwells
equations.
t
2
period T =
cos(t kx + ) shift
kx
as a function of t
Figure 7.1:
kx
It is pointed out that A cos(t) is shifted to the right by a time
=
x/v /.
The period T of the waveform is the time over which the phase changes
by 2, i.e. solving (t + T ) t = 2 yields
2
T =
x
2
wavelength = k
cos(t kx + ) shift
t+
as a function of x k
Figure 7.2:
where the factor A1ej1 has been replaced by a single complex constant
A = A1ej1 . It is also common in wave analysis to drop the sinusoidal
D=
B=0
B
E=
t
D
H=J+
t
can be written in phasor notation as
=
D
B =0
= j B
E
=J
H + j D
r, t) = E(~
where (~r, t) = (~r)ejt, E(~ r)ejt, B(~
r, t) = B(~
r)ejt, etc. Since
the ejt factors cancel on left and right hand sides, the phasor form of
Maxwells equations relate the non-time dependent portions of , E and B.
2 2E
E 2 = 0
t
2 2B
B 2 = 0
t
are written in phasor notation as
+ 2 E
2 E =0
+ 2 B
2 B =0
2
2
since t 2 (j)(j) = . It is noted that in phasor form, the wave
equations are purely a function of spatial coordinates and not time (the
ejt terms cancel). We shall use the phasor notation in studying wave
propagation in lossy conducting media.
2 2E
E 2 = 0
t
2 2B
B 2 = 0
t
Expanding the components of E in Cartesian coordinates,
2 Ex 2 Ex 2 Ex 2 Ex
+ + 2 = 0
x2 y 2 z 2 t
2 Ey 2 Ey 2 Ey 2 Ey
+ + 2 = 0
x2 y 2 z 2 t
2 Ez 2 Ez 2 Ez 2 Ez
+ + 2 = 0
x2 y 2 z 2 t
we see that each (scalar) component of the E vector obeys a 3-D wave
equation; and similarly for the components of B. Functions of the form
f (x, y, z, t) = fn (ax + by + cz vt) are solutions, and represent waves trav-
elling in a particular direction.
A plane wave is a propagating wave for which the field is uniform in any
plane perpendicular to the direction of propagation. This kind of field is an
idealization, as the fields radiated from sources spread out as a function of
distance with a curved wavefront (see handout of E field lines propagating
away from a dipole antenna). Far from the source, the wavefront may be
analysed locally as a plane wave (by locally, is meant a region over which
the curvature of the field lines is negligible).
8-1
8.1 Plane wave propagating in z direction
To simplify analysis and understanding, let us consider a wave front prop-
agating in the positive z-direction. Since the components of a plane wave
are by definition uniform within any plane perpendicular to the direction
of propagation, we conclude that E is only a function of z, independent of
x and y. Thus x = 0 and y = 0 and the 3-D wave equations in Cartesian
coordinates simplify to 1-D wave equations
2 Ex 2 Ex
2 = 0
z 2 t
2 Ey 2 Ey
2 = 0
z 2 t
2
Ez 2 Ez
2 = 0
z 2 t
Additionally, we shall assume that only an Ex component exists, and that
the Ey and Ez components of the E vector are zero.1i.e. E = hEx (z, t), 0, 0i.
Now we need only consider a single equation
2 Ex 2 Ex
2 = 0
z 2 t
dAlemberts complete solution is of the form
with v = 1 .
1
The orientation of E field depends on the radiating source. If a wire dipole antenna is placed at the
origin and aligned with the x axis, then in the y z plane, the electric field will have only an Ex
component. Away from the y z plane, other components are non-zero, because of the curvature of
the E-field lines being closed loops.
z
c
H(z, t)
Thus
B Ex
= y
t z
from which we conclude that the time-varying magnetic field has only a y
component! i.e. Z
Ex
B= t y
z
It is pointed out that, mathematically, time-independent x, y and z com-
ponents could exist, however these DC components are not generated by
any source, and are therefore zero. Ex is a travelling wave of the general
H
E = Ex x
direction of propagation
n
z
E
1
H= Ex y
y
NOTES:
The electric and magnetic components are perpendicular and are both
normal to the direction of propagation.
For the more general case of a plane wave propagating in an arbitrary
direction, involving Ex , Ey and Ez components , the associated H
vector is perpendicular, and concisely related by
1
H= nE
is a unit vector pointing in the direction of propagation.
where n
The cross product E H points in the direction of propagation.
2Ex
2
+ 2Ex = 0
z
which is now a simpler differential equation as it involves only functions
of z and not of time. The complete solution to this 2nd order ordinary
differential equation is known to be
l-axis
direction of propagation
k
r cos
k r=
l=0
l-axis x
r planes of constant
phase
z
y
= 1k
H E
where
x
r = y specifies position in space.
z
The term k r accounts for the phase change in the direction of prop-
agation. To visualise this refer to the accompanying sketch. The term
r is just k times the component of r in the k
k r = kk direction, i.e.
k r = k r cos .
One can define an axis (labelled l-axis) pointing in the k direction,
as shown in the sketch. The quantity l = k r = r cos , is the distance
measured along the l-axis from its origin. Then factor
ejkr = ejkl
1 1
H(z) x E2ej ejkz + y E1ejkz
=
The physical sinusoidal electric and magnetic fields are modelled by the pair
E
Ey
Ex
t=0 t = T /8 t = T /4 t = 3/8 t = T /2
t=0 t = T /8 t = T /4 t = 3/8 t = T /2
Figure 8.5: Circular polarization - snapshots at increasing times, in the same plane.
y E
x (t)
t=0 t = T /8 t = T /4 t = 3/8 t = T /2
Figure 8.6: Circular polarization - snapshots at increasing times, in the same plane.
The diagram below illustrates a side view snapshot along the axis of propa-
gation at a fixed instant in time - the vectors wind around like a corkscrew.
Figure 8.7: Circular polarization - E-vectors shown at a fixed instant in time. Note: this
is right-hand circular polarization.
Right-hand circular if you use your right hand, with thumb pointing in
the direction of propagation (z direction), your curled fingers will point in
the direction of rotation of the E vector in the x-y plane (i.e. the x-y plane
is at a fixed position, say z=0). In our particular example, this corresponds
to the case where = 2 .
The illustrations below show the directions of rotation in an x-y plane for
the case of a plane wave travelling in the z-direction, being out of the page.
Left-Hand Circular Polarization Right-Hand Circular Polarization
y y
E E
x x
z z
One can easily plot the E vector in the xy plane for t = 0, T /8, 2T /8, 3T /8, 4T /8
by considering the Ex and Ey components in our polarization model
8.5.3 Elliptical Polarization: Either E1 6= E2 or 6= 0, 2 , 2
Elliptical polarization is the general case, in which the vector not only ro-
tates, but also varies in length, tracing out an ellipse in a plane at a fixed
position, as illustrated in the sequence below (which is left-hand elliptical
polarization):
t=0 t = T /8 t = T /4 t = 3/8 t = T /2
Ey (t) E
E
H
H
Ex (t)
E
H
Elliptical Polarization
- rotating vector traces an ellipse
Figure 8.11: All three classes of polarization, showing both E and H vectors, and the loci
of the tips of the vectors.
Radar is a technique used to detect far away targets like aeroplanes ap-
proaching an airport, or ships out at sea. A pulse is transmitted in the
direction of interest, and the return echo is received and used to detect the
presence of targets. The range to the target is inferred from the time delay
of the echo, and the direction obtained from the pointing direction of the
antenna.
Circular polarization is sometimes used in radar applications as some scat-
9.1 Introduction
The finite difference time domain (FDTD) method is a full-wave, dynamic,
and powerful solution tool for solving Maxwells equations, introduced by
K.S. Yee in 1966 [Yee, 1966]. The algorithm involves direct discretizations of
Maxwells equations by writing the spatial and time derivatives in a central
finite difference form2.
The time-dependent Maxwells curl equations in a homogeous dielectric
medium ( = 0 r , = 0 , r = 1) are
1
The course coordinator wishes to thank doctoral student Pradip Mukhopadhyay for his assistance in
preparing the material in this section on FDTD simulation.
2
The central finite difference approximation for the derivative of the function f (x) at point P (x0 ) can be
written as
df (x0 ) f (x0 + x/2) f (x0 x/2)
= f (x0 )
=
dx x
9-1
E 1
= H (9.1)
t 0 r
H 1
= E (9.2)
t 0
E and H are vectors in three dimensions. The constants 0 and 0 are known
as the permittivity and permeability of free space and r is the relative
permittivity of the material.
Equating the vector components, we obtain three equations, one for each
vector component
Ex 1 Hz Hy
=
t 0 r y z
Ey 1 Hx Hz
=
t 0 r z x
Ez 1 Hy Hx
=
t 0 r x y
Similarly expanding
H 1
= E
t 0
as
x
y z
Hy Hy
3
H=
x
y
z
=x
Hz
y z + y Hx
z Hz
x + z x Hx
y
Hx Hy Hz
n+1/2 n1/2
Ex (k) Ex (k) 1 Hyn (k + 1/2) Hyn (k 1/2)
= (9.5)
t 0 r z
and at (z + z/2, t + t/2) for the second equation:
n+1/2 n+1/2
Hyn+1(k + 1/2) Hyn (k + 1/2) 1 Ex (k + 1) Ex (k)
= (9.6)
t 0 z
In the equations above, n is the time index and k is the spatial index, which
indexes times t = nt and positions z = kz, or positions t = (n 1/2)t
and positions z = (k 1/2)z. The time index is written as a superscript,
and the spatial index is within brackets.
Equations 9.5 and 9.6 can be rearranged as a pair of computer update
equations, which can be repeatedly updated in loop, to obtain the next time
n+1/2
values of Ex (k) and Hyn+1(k + 1/2), corresponding the Ex (t + t/2, z)
and Hy (t + t, z + z/2).
Figure 9.1 illustrates the interleaving of the E and H fields in space and
time in the FDTD formulation.
k2 k1 k k+1 k+2
n
Hy
n+1/2
Ex
k2 k1 k k+1 k+2
Figure 9.1: Interleaving of the E and H fields in space and time in the FDTD formulation.
To calculate Hy (k + 1/2), for instance, the neighbouring values of Ex at k and
k + 1 are needed. Similarly, to calculate Ex (k + 1), the value of Hy at k + 1/2
and k + 1 21 are needed (Sullivan 2000).
1 t h n+1/2
i
Hyn+1(k + 1/2) = Hyn (k
+ 1/2) E (k + 1) Exn+1/2
(k)
0 0 z x
(9.9)
Stability and the FDTD method: For stability purposes, we need
to choose the cell size z to allow 10 to 15 points per wave length. In
free space, an electromagnetic wave travels a distance of one cell in time
t = z c0 , where c0 is the speed of light in free space. This limits the
1 t z/(2 c0 )
= c0 = 0.5 (9.11)
0 0 z z/2
Making use of equation 9.11 in equation 9.8 and 9.9, we obtain the following
computer update equations:
0.5
ex(k) = ex(k) + [hy(k 1) hy(k)] (9.12)
r (k)
hy(k) = hy(k) + 0.5 [ex(k) ex(k + 1)] (9.13)
which are used repeatedly in a loop to update the field quantities at every
position at all positions in space, as time progresses. Note that the n or
n + 1/2 or n 1/2 in the superscripts do not appear. In equation 9.12, the
ex on the right side of the equal sign is the previous value at n 1/2, and
the ex on the left side is the new value, n + 1/2, which is being calculated.
In case of the spatial index, k + 1/2 and k 1/2 are replaced by k and k 1
in order to specify an integer position in an array. It is understood from
the derivation, however, that the value stored in hy(k) is the H value at
position k + 1/2.
The value of ex(k) on the nth iteration, n+1/2(k), which is
q represents Ex
related to the electric field by Ex = Ex / 00 .
0.8
Time step=35
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
1D EM Propagation
1
0.8
Time step=60
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
1D EM Propagation
1
0.8
0.4
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
9-8 of a Gaussian
Figure 9.2: 1-D Ez propagation. Propagation AJW,
pulseEEE3055F,
away fromUCT 2012
a source
located at the centre.
9.2.2 Wave hitting a dielectric medium (Matlab code)
We now consider the case where a plane wave travelling in free space
(medium 1) strikes a dielectric medium (medium 2), as is illustrated in Fig-
ure 9.3, which shows a source in free space on the left side, and a dielectric
slab on the right.
= 0 r
=
0
Source z
(or k)
kstart
When the wave strikes the interface, a fraction of the incoming wave is
reflected, and a fraction is transmitted into the medium. The amplitude
of the reflected and transmitted waves, relative to the incident wave, are
described by the reflection coefficient and the transmission coefficient ,
which relate the amplitudes of the E field waves. From theoretical analysis,
these can be determined in terms of the characteristic impedances of the
media, as
Eref 2 1
= = (9.14)
Einc 2 + 1
Etrans 22
= = (9.15)
Einc 2 + 1
where 1 and 2 are the impedances of the respective media given by
1 2
= (9.17)
1 + 2
2 1
= (9.18)
1 + 2
where 1 and 2 are the relative permittivities of medium 1 and 2 respec-
tively.
The 1-D FDTD code can be easily adapted to model propagation against
a dielectric interface, as shown below. Running the simulation should show
reflected and refracted waves as in the snapshots in Figure 9.4. Note here
that the reflected pulse inverts in sign, as indicated by a negative reflection
coefficient (check this by calculating it).
0.8
Time step=100
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
0.8 Transmitted
Time step=190
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
Reflected
0.6
0.8
1
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Exn(1) = Exn2(2)
then the fields at the edge will not reflect. This condition must be applied
at both ends.
Implementation
This is easy to implement, store the value of Ex (2) for two time steps and
then put it in Ex (1).
Modify the above program as follows:
.
.
ex_left_m1 = 0.0;
ex_left_m2 = 0.0;
ex_right_m1 = 0.0;
ex_right_m2 = 0.0;
cb = zeros(1,KE);
cb(1,:) = 0.5;
% You may choose cb(1,k_start:KE)=0.5/eps_r
.
.
for n=1:NSTEPS
.
.
% add the pulse at the centre of the grid
ex(1,kc) = pulse;
Ez 1 Hy Hx
= ( ) (9.19)
t 0 r x y
Hx 1 Ez
= (9.20)
t 0 y
Hy 1 Ez
= (9.21)
t 0 x
Now we can write the above three equations in the finite difference scheme
as
n+1/2 n1/2 n
Ez (i, j) Ez (i, j) 1 Hy (i + 1/2, j) Hyn (i 1/2, j)
=
t 0 r x
Hxn (i, j + 1/2, ) Hxn (i, j 1/2)
(9.22)
y
n+1/2 n+1/2
Hxn+1(i, j + 1/2) Hxn (i, j + 1/2) 1 Ez (i, j + 1) Ez (i, j)
=
t 0 y
(9.23)
n+1/2 n+1/2
Hyn+1 (i + 1/2, j) Hyn (i + 1/2, j) 1 Ez (i + 1, j) Ez (i, j)
=
t 0 x
(9.24)
n
n+1/2 n1/2 t Hy (i, j + 1/2, ) Hyn (i, j 1/2)
Ez (i, j) = Ez (i, j) +
0 r x
Hxn (i, j + 1/2, ) Hxn (i, j 1/2)
(9.25)
y
x
y z
H =
x
y 0 = z H y
x
Hx
y
Hx Hy 0
1 t n+1/2
Hyn+1(i + 1/2, j)
= Hyn (i + 1/2, j) +
Ez n+1/2
(i + 1, j) Ez (i, j)
0 x
(9.27)
For computer implementation we can write the above equations update
equations as
ez(i,j)=ez(i,j)+{dt/(eps_0*eps_r)}
*[{Hy(i,j)-Hy(i-1,j)}/dx
-{Hx(i,j)-Hx(i,j-1)}/dy]
Hx(i,j) = Hx(i,j)-{dt/(mu_0*dy)}*{Ez(i,j+1)-Ez(i,j)}
Hy(i,j) = Hy(i,j)+{dt/(mu_0*dx)}*{Ez(i+1,j)-Ez(i,j)}
clear all;
cc=2.99792458e8; % Speed of light in free space
mu_0=4.0*pi*1.0e-7; % Permeability in free space
eps_0=1.0/(cc*cc*mu_0); % Permittivity in free space
eps_r = 1.0; % Dielectric constant in free space
ie = 201; % Grid pixels in Y direction
je = 201; % Grid pixels in X direction
Source pulse
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
0 50 100 150
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Figure 9.6: Propagation of a pulse away from a source. The pulse moves outwards as an
expanding circle, centred on the source.
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Figure 9.7: 2-D. Time snapshot of the radiating pulse interacting with a dielectric interface.
The reflected and transmitted waves are seen on either side of the interface.
9.5 References
Yee, K.S., Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems in-
volving Maxwells equations in isotropic media, 1966.
Taflove, A., Computational electrodynamics : the finite-difference time-
domain method, Boston, Mass. : Artech House,1995
Sullivan, D. M., Electromagnetic simulation using the FDTD method,
New York : IEEE Press, 2000.
Kunz, K.S. and Luebbers, R.J., The Finite Difference Time Domain
Method for Electromagnetics, Boca Raton, FL; CRC Press, 1993.
% fdtd_2d_TM_2.m
% Excercise ....
% 2D FDTD free space propagation striking dielec-
tric slab on right side
% For EEE355F AJW
clear all;
cc=2.99792458e8; %speed of light in free space
mu_0=4.0*pi*1.0e-7; %permeability of free space
eps_0=1.0/(cc*cc*mu_0); %permittivity of free space
ie = 200; %Grid pixels in Y direction
je = 200; % Grid pixels in X direction
is = floor(ie/2) ;
js = floor(je/2) ;
% Electric and Magnetic field
Ez = zeros(ie,je);
Hx = zeros(ie,je);
Hy = zeros(ie,je);
eps_r = ones(ie,je);
jd = js+15; % Position of interface in X direction
eps_r(:,jd:je) = 10.0; % dielectric constant
nmax = 150; % number of time steps
ddx = 1.0e-3; % X grid size
ddy = ddx; % Y grid size
dt = 0.98/(cc*sqrt( (1/ddx)^2 + (1/ddy)^2 ));
%*********************************************
tw = 26.53e-12;
t0 = 4.0*tw;
T = (0:1:nmax-1).*dt;
source = -2.0*((T-t0)./tw).*exp(-1.0*((T-t0)./tw).^2.0);
[Emax] = max(source);
[Emin] = min(source);
C1 = dt./(eps_r.*eps_0);
C2 = dt/mu_0;
for n = 1:nmax
%---------------------update Ez--------------------
for jj = 2:je
for ii = 2:ie
Ez(ii,jj) = Ez(ii,jj) + C1(ii,jj).*((Hy(ii,jj) - Hy(ii-
1,jj))./ddx -(Hx(ii,jj) - Hx(ii,jj-1))./ddy);
% fdtd_2d_TM_3.m
% Excercise ....
% 2D FDTD free space propagation striking dielec-
tric slab on top right corner
% For EEE355F AJW
clear all;
cc=2.99792458e8; % speed of light in free space
mu_0=4.0*pi*1.0e-7; % permeability of free space
eps_0=1.0/(cc*cc*mu_0); % permittivity of free space
ie = 150; % Grid pixels in Y direction
je = 150; % Grid pixels in X direction
is = floor(ie/2);
js = floor(je/2);
% Electric and Magnetic field
Ez = zeros(ie,je);
Hx = zeros(ie,je);
Hy = zeros(ie,je);
eps_r = ones(ie,je);
id = is-15; % dielectric interface
jd = js+15;
eps_r(1:id,jd:je) = 40.0; % dielectric constant
nmax = 120; % number of time steps
ddx = 1.0e-3; % X grid size
ddy = ddx; % Y grid size
dt = 0.98/(cc*sqrt( (1/ddx)^2 + (1/ddy)^2 ));
%*****************************************************
tw = 26.53e-12;
t0 = 4.0*tw;
T = (0:1:nmax-1).*dt;
source = -2.0*((T-t0)./tw).*exp(-1.0*((T-t0)./tw).^2.0);
[Emax] = max(source); [Emin] = min(source);
C1 = dt./(eps_r.*eps_0);
C2 = dt/mu_0;
for n = 1:nmax
%-------------------update Ez-----------------
for jj = 2:je
for ii = 2:ie
Ez(ii,jj) = Ez(ii,jj) + C1(ii,jj).*((Hy(ii,jj) - Hy(ii-
1,jj))./ddx -(Hx(ii,jj) - Hx(ii,jj-1))./ddy);
end
clear all;
cc=2.99792458e8; % Speed of light in free space
mu_0=4.0*pi*1.0e-7; % Permeability of free space
eps_0=1.0/(cc*cc*mu_0); % Permittivity of free space
eps_r = 1.0; % Dielectric constant in air
ie = 201; % Grid pixels in Y direction
je = 201; % Grid pixels in X direction
is = floor(ie/2) ;
js = floor(je/2) ;
% Electric and Magnetic field
Ez = zeros(ie,je);
Hx = zeros(ie,je);
Hy = zeros(ie,je);
nmax = 400; % Number of time steps
ddx = 1.0e-3; % X grid size
ddy = ddx; % Y grid size
dt = 0.98/(cc*sqrt( (1/ddx)^2 + (1/ddy)^2 ));
%***********************************************
T = (0:1:nmax-1).*dt;
f_int = 20.0e+9; %Frequency (20 GHz) of the incident pulse
source = sin(2.0*pi*T.*f_int); %Sine wave
% Plot injected pulse
figure
plot(source)
title(Source pulse: 20 GHz Sine wave)
pause(1);
[Emax] = max(source);
[Emin] = min(source);
C1 = dt/(eps_0*eps_r);
C2 = dt/mu_0;
figure
for n = 1:nmax
%------------------------------ Ez -----------------
for jj = 2:je
for ii = 2:ie
Ez(ii,jj) = Ez(ii,jj) + C1*((Hy(ii,jj) - Hy(ii-1,jj))./ddx -
(Hx(ii,jj) - Hx(ii,jj-1))./ddy);
end
end
P=EH
The units of E are Vm1 and the units of H are Am1 and thus the units
of P are VAm2 or Wm2 or Js1 m2. The total power passing through a
surface S1 is obtained by integration over S1, i.e.
Z
W = P dS watts
S1
is
The power dP passing through an elemental surface dS with normal n
dS = P dS
dP = |P| cos dS = P n
10-1
of a vector identities1 and Maxwells curl equations:
P = (E H)
= ( E) H ( H) E
H E
= H (J + ) E
t t
1 (H H) 1 E E
= JE
2 t 2 t
1 1
= ( H 2 ) ( E 2) J E
t 2 t 2
Thus
I Z
P dS = PdV
S VZ Z Z
1 1
= ( H 2 )dV ( E 2)dV J E dV
VZt 2 VZ t 2
ZV
d 1 d 1
= ( H 2 )dV ( E 2)dV J E dV
dt V 2 dt V 2 V
Z
d d
= UM UE J E dV
dt dt V
where
R
UM = V ( 21 H 2 )dV is the energy in the magnetic field within the vol-
ume V . The quantity 12 H 2 is the magnetic energy density in Jm3.
R
UE = V ( 12 E 2)dV is the energy stored in the electric field within the
volume V . The quantity 12 E 2 is the electric energy density in Jm3.
R
V J E dV is a term that represents either power dissipated through
ohmic losses or power generated by a source inside V.
If representing power dissipated, the term J E can be re-expressed as
J E = E E = E 2 in Wm3.
1
Identity 1: (E H) = ( E) H ( H) E
1 (HH)
Identity 2: H
t H = 2 t
2 2 2
Hy 1 Hx 1 Hy 1 Hz
H
t H = Hx H
t + Hy
x
t + Hz H
t =
z
2 t + 2 t + 2 t
E(z, t) = Ex (z, t)
x
H(z, t) = Hy (z, t)
y
= 1E
P H
2
1 1
= E1 ej1 ejkz E1ej1 ejkz sin( )z
2 2
2
1 E1
= z Wm2
2
which agrees with the result previously obtained with the real signal repre-
sentation.
Isotropic
radiator
Pt
3dB
Sidelobe
180 deg 3dB 180 deg
3dB Beamwidth (G drops to 1/2 of max)
The width of a beam is usually measured between the half power points
on the main lobe, i.e. where G drops to half its peak value, or equivalently
3 dB below the peak.
A well known result from antenna theory is that the beamwidth from a
radiating aperture (measured in a chosen plane) is approximately
3dB arcsin
D D
where D is the diameter of the aperture in the plane, and is the wave-
length. The approximation is valid for narrow beam antennas, for which
the diameter of the aperture (measured in the plane) of the is several wave-
lengths wide.
Solution:
H into page
Battery P J Resistor
V E E Length d
P P
Ez H
I
H
The magnetic field lines circulate around the wires and resistor as illus-
trated (apply right hand rule for direction). The electric field lines extend
from the wire at the positive voltage down to negative voltage wire. The
power flow at any point in space is described by P = EH. Below is shown
a top view of the circuit. The Poynting vector points from left to right.
P P
Consider the region local to the resistor. The electric field between the
plates is vertically directed (z-direction), and is given by
V IR
Ez = =
d d
and the magnetic field surrounding the resistor is
I
H =
2r
The power flow at any point in space is described by the cross product
P = EH
= Ez H sin 90
r
IR I
=
r
d 2r
I 2R
=
r
2rd
which is a vector that points radially inwards as illustrated2. From this we
observe that
the power flows from the outside inwards towards the centre axis of the
column.
2
You should verify the direction E H by considering the cross product at several points in space.
Note that
r points radially outwards from the centre axis.
Question: How much power flows through the wires to the load?
H H
E
P=EH
points into the page
I
I E out of page
into page
H
Figure 10.5: Electromagnetic field surrounding a parallel wire transmission line. If the
polarity of the current changes, the E and H field lines reverse direction
(although P = E H points always points in the same direction - into the
page).
Ground plane
(copper)
Figure 10.6: Micro-strip microwave transmission line. The EM wave propagates as a guided
wave towards a (matched) load.
Table 10.1: Parameters used for specifying maximum levels for exposure to ionizing
radiation.
11-1
straight through the metal? In a strict sense, yes it does on propagating
forward, but it is also accompanied by a forward propagating wave arising
from the surface currents. These two forward propagating waves are in-
verted, with respect to one another, and sum to zero. Thus in speech we
say that the incident wave bounces off the surface - but more correctly,
the phenomenon of reflection is a re-radiation effect.
x
Incident wave
Reflected
Perfect
conductor
We now analyse the steady state plane wave solution to the wave equation
subject to the appropriate boundary condition: tangential components of
E are zero at the boundary, i.e. Ex (0) = and Ey (0) = 0.
The phasor forms of the incident and reflected waves are
Ex = E+ ejkz + Ee+jkz
H y = 1 E+ejkz E e+jkz
Applying the boundary condition
0 = E+ejk0 + Ee+jk0
implies
E = E+
Thus the total field in terms of E+ is
Ex = E+ejkz E+ e+jkz = E+ ejkz e+jkz = E+2j sin kz
2E+
0
Envelope of
magnetic field
z
3
4
4 z = 0
Figure 11.2: Standing wave resulting from reflection of a sinusoidal wave by a perfect con-
ducting surface.
All transmission line concepts and formulas are applicable to the reflection
of plane waves, e.g. SWR, reflection coefficient, Smith chart calculations etc.
The units of E are V/m, and the units of H are A/m, analogous to voltage
and current in the transmission line.
The wave impedance at a position z is defined as the ratio of total electric
to magnetic field in the plane
Ex (z)
(z) =
Hy (z)
Directly from the transmission line analogy, the impedance at a distance l
from a load plane of impedance L is
L cos kl + j sin kl
(l) =
cos kl + j sin kl
and the reflection and transmission coefficients are
E L
= =
E+ L +
and
E2 2L
= =
E+ L +
where E2 is the amplitude of the wave in medium two.
Solution
The impedances in air is
r r
0 4 107
1 377 Ohms
0 8.85 1012
and in the glass is
r
4 107
2 = 169 Ohms
5 8.85 1012
The reflection coefficient is
2 1 169 377
= = = 0.380
2 + 1 169 + 377
and hence ||2 = 0.145. The reflected power is ||2 Pinc = 0.145 mW and
the transmitted power is the balance being 0.855 mW.
Reflected
Transmitted
k
k2
2
z
+
k+
Incident wave
Medium 1 Medium 2
Figure 11.3: Propagation directions of incident, reflected and refracted waves at an interface
between two media.
+ (r, t) = E
E + ejk+ r ejt +(r, t) = 1 k
H + E
+ (r, t)
1
(r, t) = E
E ejk r ejt H (r, t) = 1 k E (r, t)
1
2 (r, t) = E
E 2 ejk2 r ejt 2 (r, t) = 1 k
H 2 E
2 (r, t)
1
NOTE: The term k+ r = k+ k r is just k+ (the wave number) times the
component of r in the k direction. Imagine defining an axis pointing in the
direction, and let the distance along this axis be . The term ejk+ kr
k is
jk+
equal to e .
The total electric field in medium 1 is the sum of incident and reflected
fields
1 (r, t) = E
E + ejk+ r ejt + E
ejk r ejt
The angles of incidence and reflection are found by imposing the boundary
conditions previously derived in Section 4, i.e.
Consider, for example, the electric field. At the interface plane, the bound-
ary condition Et1 = Et2 becomes:
+ )x ejk+ r ejt + (E
(E )x ejk r ejt = (E
2)x ejk2 r ejt at z = 0
and
+ )y ejk+ r ejt + (E
(E )y ejk r ejt = (E
2)y ejk2 r ejt at z = 0
k+ r = k r = k2 r at z = 0
or
(k+)x x + (k+)y y = (k)x x + (k)y y = (k2)x x + (k2)y y
This must hold along the line y = 0 in the xy plane, and so
and similarly it must hold along the line x = 0 in the xy plane, and so
If we orientate the axes such that the plane of incidence is the xz plane
as shown in the figure, then the y components of the k vectors are zero, and
the remaining boundary condition
implies
k1 sin + = k1 sin = k2 sin 2
from which we obtain Snells laws of reflection and refraction:
k1 sin + = k1 sin + =
and
sin 2 k1 /v1 v2
k1 sin + = k2 sin 2 = = =
sin + k2 /v2 v1
Since for most dielectrics, 1 2 0 , the ratio
sin 2 v2 c/n2 n1 1 2
= = =
sin + v1 c/n1 n2 2 1
where n1 = c/v1 and n2 = c/v2 are the refractive indexes of the dielectrics.
To analyse the magnitudes of reflected and transmitted waves, we need
examine the two cases of a transverse electric (TE) incident wave, and a
transverse magnetic (TM) incident wave. An arbitrary polarization can be
split into the sum of these two orthogonal components.
E
CASE E2
Transverse k
H
Magnetic (into) k2 H2
(TM) 2
z
+
E+ k+
H+
(out)
Medium 1 Medium 2
Figure 11.4: Definitions of vector quantities on either side of an interface for the case of a
TM incident wave.
E+ jk+ r + = ( + )E+ejk+ r
H+ = y e E yk
1
= E = ( )Eejk r
H y ejk r E yk
1
E2 jk2 r 2 = ( 2 )E2ejk2 r
H2 = y
e E yk
2
Take note of the directions of the vectors indicated: these represent the di-
rections in which E and H point at the interface (i.e. at x = 0 and z = 0) at
time t = 0, assuming the constants E+ , E , E2 were all positive. Also, it is
noted that H is defined as pointing into the page, such that when + = 0,
and E
E + will point in the same direction (for positive E+ , E , E
2), to
allow comparison with the derivation in Section 9.1. The relationships be-
tween E+ , E and E2 will now be established by applying the boundary
conditions.
+ H
(d) Ht1 = Ht2 H = H
2 1 1 1
1 E+ 1 E = 2 E2
Thus (d) implies (so does (a) after substituting Snells law and some ma-
nipulation)
1
E+ E = E2
2
and (b) implies
cos 2
E+ + E = E2
cos +
We solve these two equations to obtain the reflected and transmitted am-
plitudes in terms of the incident amplitude:
2 cos 2 1 cos +
E = E+
2 cos 2 + 1 cos +
and
22 cos +
E2 = E+
2 cos 2 + 1 cos +
The reflection and transmission coefficients are defined as
E 2 cos 2 1 cos +
T M = =
E+ 2 cos 2 + 1 cos +
and
E2 22 cos +
T M = =
E+ 2 cos 2 + 1 cos +
For the special case of the incident angle being zero, i.e. + = = 2 = 0,
we obtain, as in Section 11.3,
2 1
T M =
2 + 1
and
22
T M =
2 + 1
2
See example plot for Example: Plane wave air into glass
H
CASE
Transverse k E2
E
Electric k2+
2 H2
(TE)
z
+
E+
(out) k+
H+
Medium 1 Medium 2
Figure 11.5: Definitions of vector quantities on either side of an interface for the case of a
TE incident wave.
+ = y E+ jk+ r
E E+ejk+ r
H+ = (k+ y ) e
1
= y y E
E Eejk r = (k
H ) ejk r
1
2 = y 2 y E2
E E2ejk2 r 2 = (k
H ) ejk2 r
2
+ sin + + 1 H
(c) Bn1 = Bn2 1 H sin = 2 H
2 sin 2
1 1 2
1 E+ sin + + 1 E sin = 2 E2 sin 2
11 E+ cos + + 1
E cos
1
= 12 E2 cos 2
Thus we have from (b) and (and(c) after substituting Snells law and some
manipulation)
E+ + E = E2
and from (d)
1 cos 2
E+ E = E2
2 cos +
Solving for E and E2 we obtain
2 cos + 1 cos 2
E = E+
2 cos + + 1 cos 2
and
22 cos +
E2 = E+
2 cos + + 1 cos 2
The reflection and transmission coefficients are
E 2 cos + 1 cos 2
T E = =
E+ 2 cos + + 1 cos 2
and
E2 22 cos +
T E = =
E+ 2 cos + + 1 cos 2
For TE polarization, it can be shown3 that for dielectrics with equal perme-
abilities, there exists no angle for which T E = 0. The Brewster angle only
occurs for TM polarization. Thus the Brewster angle is sometimes called
the polarization angle, as light with an arbitrary polarization incident at
the Brewster angle is polarized on reflection. The TM components are not
reflected, but the TE components are4.
3
Do this as an exercise by analysing the numerator of .
4
See example plot for Example: Plane wave air into glass; compare TM and TE plots.
Reflected
Transmitted
2
z
+
Incident wave
Medium 1 Medium 2
AIR GLASS
|rho| TM
0.8 |rho| TE
|T E |
0.6
0.4 Brewster
angle
0.2
|T M |
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
0.4
|T M |
|T E |
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Figure 11.7:
25
2 versus +
Refraction angle (deg)
20
15
10
From Air into Glass
5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Transverse Magnetic Incident Wave
1
rho
0.8 tau
T M
0.6
0.4
Brewster
0.2
angle
0
0.2 T M
0.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Transverse Electric Incident Wave
1
rho
T E tau
0.5
0.5 T E
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Figure 11.8:
Reflected
Transmitted
2
z
+
Incident wave
Medium 1 Medium 2
GLASS AIR
NOTE:
Brewster angle for TM polarization occurs at B = 24.1 degrees.
Angle of total internal reflection occurs at c = 26.6 degrees.
Reflection coefficient becomes complex for > c and an angle-dependent
phase shift occurs (not plotted here).
Below are plotted and for 0 < < c.
80
Refraction angle (deg)
60 2 versus +
40
From Glass into Air
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees Brewster
Transverse Magnetic Incident Wave
4
rho
tau
3
2 T M
Brewster
1
T M angle
0
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Transverse Electric Incident Wave
2
rho
T E tau
1.5
0.5
T E
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Incident angle in degrees
Figure 11.10:
Wm2
I =Pn
=
where P is the Poynting vector and n z is the surface normal.
x
P P2
2
z
+
n
P+
Medium 1 Medium 2
|I+ | |I | = |I2 |
which is consistent with the fact that the net energy per second entering a
surface from one side must balance with that leaving from the other side.
|P+ | |P | 6= |P2|
12-1
Figure 12.1: Exponentially decaying plane wave in a conducting (lossy) medium. Note E
and H are not in phase in a lossy medium.
If all field quantities are sinusoidal of form ejt , then |Jc | D
t
E
|E| = |jE|
t
Thus for a physical material to be regarded as a good conductor, the fre-
quency satisfies
This requirement is satisfied for all metals from DC to 100 GHz (and con-
siderably higher in frequency).
y
= 0, and the wave equation simplifies to
2E E
=
z 2 t
which has a solution of the form
E = E0 ej(tz)ez
modelling a wave propagating in the forward direction. The factor ez
represents a decaying amplitude in the z direction.
A plot of one of the components of the electric field is shown in the following
illustration.
Analysis of the H field shows that H is is 45 degrees out of phase with
the E field - see tutorial example.
Example
Consider a sinusoidal 50 Hz plane wave propagating inside copper (which
is a very good conductor) = 5.96 107 r = 1.00 at 300 K. The skin
depth at 50 Hz is
r
2
= = 0.0092 m 9.2 mm
4107 5.9 107 250
105 m 0.01 mm
= 6.5 107 m
Figure 12.4:
DC Resistance
The DC resistance of a piece of wire of length l and thickness 2r is
l l
R0 = A = []
r2
where A = r2 is the cross sectional area.
Figure 12.6:
Example
Consider a the difference in resistance per metre at DC and at 50 MHz of
a copper wire of diameter 5 mm. r = 2.5 103 m
At DC,
R0
0.0008 m1
l
At 50 MHz,
3
RHF R0 r 4 2.5 10
= 8 10 5
= 0.1 m1
l l 2 2 10
which is 125 times greater, than at DC.
13-1
14 Thermal Radiation from Warm
Objects
why warm objects radiate
frequency spectrum (watts/Hz)
good and bad radiators; black body radiators versus metalic objects.
noise power received by an antenna aimed at a warm surface. (ekTB)
demonstration of UCT radiomter (35 GHz or 10 GHz)
14-1