wrap-up
charles meyerson
29 july 1976
journ 291
THE YRAP-UP, consisting of an overview of What I've Read:
Royko's Boss (224 vv)
Wise's Politics of Lying (614 pn)
Broder's The Farty"s Ove fe Party's Over (280 pp)
Hapgood's Serewimg 0: e_ Average Mam (323 pp)
Noodwara'a & Berastein's At the Pres: ‘Ss All the President's Mem (383 pp)
Wolfe's Sleetrie Kool-Aid Acie Test (372 pp.
and Wolfe's work in The New Journalism th pp + miscellany)
--for a total of 2267+ pages, 133 or so short of
2400, But what's half a book between friends?
The Moral of the story is "Call it as you see
it. But make sure you look at it good and hara."
| The Nixon administration aeeused the news media
of eoloring the news. (Slightly akin to the pot
telling off the kettle, it turned out.) That
criticism, however, was off the mark, If the
f anythin
media were guilty it was not so much “coloring
the news" as refusing to(even|nention Jthat
any colors existed.
js all but the most simple observations,
objectivity is fa ayth. . .and maybe = nightmare,
Although the Merry Pranksters might disagree, a
consensus can generally be reached on the
b,
dimensions of a\Wiek, the color of a ear—
sty piea
even what hanpened' at a SeutiKe city coumeil meeting.
mWrap-up
neyerson
page 2
(put tne more eomplex am issue, the more data
available to deseribe a phenomenon, the nore
difficult that conseusus and the underlying
truths are to reaeh,
l When journalists deal with osyehosocial iaummm
things like eities, bureaueraeies, political
parties and evem a single human mind, the
available information grows astronomieally.
Given traditional aealw’restrietions of
time and spaee, the reporter ean inelude in
@ given story just the tiniest fraction of
that data.
l Each decision=-whom to interview, whieh tares
to hear, what books to read——leads to 2 suibelmetam—
eoloration of the story that finally emerges.
The journalist who best serves his audienee
is one vho interviews as many persons as possible,
listens to and reads as mueh as he cam, organizing
Sust aa important, thegh 13 that he make
it all coherent 1) sasimumnnenaeaneusbumt Sunline 188
his own axwieerkims biases and his judguents. Only
Mm
after YwOwing where the journalist is "coming from"
ec it will go
can the audience aecilW ere Wele-eeimOn the
basis of his story.frav-up
meyerson
page 3
[ certaimy David Wise comes close to fulfilling
this ideal-journalist role. His use of detail
and researeh make The Polities of Lying outstanding.
Woodward and Bernstein deserve credit for their
similar work mein a narrower range of the same
subjeet matter, The distinetion that makes
Wise's work the more eomplete viece of journalicm, however,
is that he develops and supports his owm juagnents
throughout the book. Beeause he makes no seeret
he leaves the readers fneembe choice but
of his motives
Mrujammtmminsicers his honesty, if not his beliefs.
a factual wemet 3
(fo be fair, the Woodstein is more a
about journalism than journalism itself; as
such, it ean be excused from =ekmecjmtwmambs
———
this inadequacy.)
a
lao yaryine degrees, eaeh of the other authors
eS tne same criteria. 4seeeweiwendniepice—
David Hapgood ané Mike iceman
without Wise's penchant for detail but with satirie
hatehets sharpened by exverienee; those blades
jroder,
are exposed from the start. David Rete takes
& more sedate view of the nation's political
parties, but he Joes devote a full chapter to
his owm views and evaluations.wrap-up
meyerson
page 4
[15 $oe-t08 Wolfe's Eleetrie Kool-Aia@ Acid Test,
the reader knows from the first sentemee that, yeah,
this mau may wear tailor-made clothing im real
life: but for the duration of this
book, he's tossing his eookies im with this
Weeeeeiiird bunch of hippies.
\ Surely, the nation faces the greater threat
dishing
aot from this buneh of revorterm
studie@ biases up front but from those who
he concealed weapons of half-truth,
earry
decention and lies.
eS caper, with reward fax of fame
and fortume for its intrenid heroes, oblivion
amd exile for its villains, demonstrates that
clearly.
Now, if only the people will remenbere=
cre