Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Binder 1
Binder 1
DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0335
CFD
210016
:(CFD)
Navier-Stokes ]ameson
Runge- Kutta Spalart-Allmaras
(IGE)""""
1
CFD -
/
"" UH-60A
:
: ;;;;;Navier-Stokes
: V211.52 i: A : 1000-6893(2016)08-2539-13
3
[1
C tSS [2]L gh t[3 ] G an e sh [-
4 5]
(IGE)
COGE) Nath an I
Green [6]
Chee sem an 1 Ben n ett[7]
[8J |
CFD1
/
""
""
[ l
(
)
1
1.1
(CFD)
1[10-11 10 RX15 RX6 R( xyz R
)
l
0. 5 R UH-60A
411 600
[] 4 440 16 2 21 7 2161
1
|
Kut z[13J Na vier
St oke s |
11
l
Na vier-St oke s ] Fig.1 Computational grids of rotor flowfield at in ground
Spa lart- All
m aras effect flight
2542 Aug. 25 2016 Vol.37 No.8
2.1 /
/
2.1.1
2.2 CFD
11 /
l CFD
f( CFD
: [18 J CFD
1 ) -
2
:
1 l
2) ()
1 2 2 CFD
; =(1 AKI+ 2 l-
CX =(1 -) 21
(3)
: =f (1 ) /( f (1 ) + f (2) )
3) F ;;6p = F FD ( F ;: -F;:'IB) (4)
:l ;11 1
l ;FLp11 +1 ;
;FFD5fU F Bz
( ) CFD11;
3
/:
2.1.2
4 CFD
; 11
5 ;
2
5
;
|
/:
:CFDl 2543
2
Fig.2 Flowchart of rotor trim analyses at in ground effect flight
20
3 '0 (Testl-- 80 (Calculation)
A(Testl) --A(Calculation)
(Calcul n)
3.1
4
2::::B
ROBIN l
'loO
[ 0 .-==: :
:2m/ 0.083m
-
AV
AV
O . 860 m 4
l 0.2
0.066 mNACA0012
30
3 ROBIN
180 m/s
Fig.3 Trim results of ROBIN rotor
=0.01 0.050.150. 23
2.8
3
|
4
( lg ( t.CT) )
( )
/
l 2 3 4 5
n
5 4
( X L Fig.4 Residual convergence curves of thrust coefficient
2544 Aug. 25 2016 Vol.37 No.8
) 135
-- Chee semanl3j
C
1.25
Testl3j
Calculation
C/=
0.079 5
=0.01
1.15
Testl19j
-- Calculation
0.01
u 1.05
h
Ay
J
2 3 4 5
h/R
6
-0.01
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Fig.6 Comparison of variation of rotor thrust increments
x/L with different flight heights
0.03
CT/=
0 065 7
= 0
= 0.23
_.
.. Testl19j
- Calculation
3.3
UH-60A
8.1 7 8 m 27 rad/s
300. 527 m4
-0.01 0.189 3 R
-0.02
7 CrI =0.15
0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
(CQ) OJ
x/L
5
Fig.5 Comparisons of calcu!ated pressure coefficient on
fuse!age top line with test data
3.2
;
|
14
[ 3J
C/=0.15
Testl20j
12 -- Calculation
R=l.105m 4
6 _l_-1>1_ Z J. _
NPL9615 :
h/R=O .40. 50.6 0. 7 0.8 0.91. 0
u
:::::: 10 F-
I
. . ----::"_
- _
'
--
1. 5234 6 T 8
CFD 6
o 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
7
2 Fig.7 Ramp increment of rotor power required at a !ow
T speed flight
:CFDl 2545
;
4
CrI =0.1
10
4.1
_._.-._.-.-
12
UH-60A .;
10 .;
.;
- C/a=0.05
8 CT/= /
_.-
C/= 0.10
J
6
/
.... - - -
- - -
...
/
4
11 2
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0
h/R
(a) Rotor power required with difTerent
FAU
J
/
J
0.9 1
".
"/
Z " .
"
C.r 0.8 1/
i
u //
A
AV
_.-
'1 --- C/= 0 10
AV
KO
A
C/= 0 15
/
l
AV
A
q
OV
AV
3
AV
W
OV
AV
AV
nU
rb
J
"
h/R
(b) Ratios between rotor power required
of IGE and that of OGE
8
9
Fig. 8 Comparison of rotor power required between
Fig.9 Comparison of variation of rotor power required
moving ground and stationary ground
with different blade loads
4.2
7
-0-h/R= 0.42
h/R= 0.53
h/R= 1.00
L
J
h)
l
UH-60A 9
4
3
0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.20
h/R=2 |
h/R > 10
2 Fig.10 Compan of variation of rotor power requi1
with advanceio in derent flight heigl
2546 Aug. 25 2016 Vol.37 No.8
4.3
4. 3.1
11 =0.020.030.05
-0.012
_jx
Cp
Up'pe
y O .
(b)=0.03
(c)=0.05
11
Fig.11 Rotor flowfields different advance ratios
2548 Aug. 25 2016 Vol.37 No.8
-
10
'F180 ( 11 ( b) )
h/R= 0.53
5 h/R=0.79 14 ( b) 0.6 2 R
- h/R= 1.00
-- h/R
= 1.50
h/R=2.00
ZJ
- - OGE
E)
\X
t=
270 t=180
-10
15
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 4.5
rlR
13 15UH-60A
Fig.13 Rotor induced velocity distribution along radial
7.2
direction of blade in hover
OV
AVAV
4
.
AVAV
10
4
====-
l2 3 4 5
4
.
4
hv
4
AU
AVAVAV
-
-
f
)
E -5
-10
15 ( a) 80-JI
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
r/R - h/R =0.42
OV
AVAV
(a)
--- h/R
=I.OO
=====
.
l2 3 4 5
'
-- OGE
A
10
'
.
hv
.
AU
5 -
0.4
AHV
AVAVAV
4
-
L E)
K
A
PJ
-0.8
\
(;
-1.2
-10 o 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
F
-15 (b)A-
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
2.8
r/R
(b) I/f= 270
14
Fig.14 Rotor induced velocity distribution along
radial direction of blade in forward flight
270UH-60A
0.08 R
14 ( a)
L2
o 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06
(c)B
O .01 O.02
; 15
0.03 Fig.15 Variation of rotor trim value with different
Cd= ;
O .1
=80 -Ajcos <<-Bjs in << (5)
15
; [lJ HA YDEN J S. The e[[ect o[ the ground on helicopter hov
ering power required[C J //Proceedings of the 32nd Ameri
;15( a) 10
can Helicopter Society Forum. Washington D. C.: AHS
l
1976: 10-12.
[2J CURTISS I-I C SUN M PUTMANET W F et al. Ro-
; tor aerodynamics in ground effect at low advance ratios
3) ]. 1998 30(5):104-109
KANG N SUN M. Investigation 01 the ground vortex
;
phenomenon due to the interaction between rotor' s wake
and the ground [1 ]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and
Applied1echanics 199830(5):104-109 (in Chinese).
[11J . Navier-Stokes
[14J SPALART P ALLMARAS S. A one-equation turhulence NASA rotary wing induced velocity studies: NASA-TM
model lor aerodynamic flows [1]. AIAA Journal 1992 80232[R]. Hampton:Langley Research Center 1980.
439(1):5-21.
[15J RAJAGOPALAN R G L1M C K. Laminar flow analysis :
of a rotor in hover[J]. Journal 01 the American Helicopter . 1
Society 1991 36(1):12-23.
[16J / E-mail:zhumingyong@nuaa. edu. cn
HL[1]. 2008(3):24-30.
W ANG B ZHAO Q J XU G H. Numerical simulations I I .
for the flowlield of helicopter rotor/fuselage hased upon i
momentum-source method [ J ]. Helicopter Technique
2008(3):24-30 Cin Chinese). Tel:025-84893753
1 2003:4.
GAO Z CHEN R L. The helicopter flight dynamics[M]. :
Beijing:Science Press 2003:4 Cin Chinese).
8J Jl CFD Tel:025-84893753
Abstract: A compulalional Iluid dynamics (CFD) melhod based on lhe unslruclured grid lechnique and momenlum source
melhod is developed aimming at simulating the unsteady aerodynamic characteristics 01 a rotor in ground effect (IGE). In this
method the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations have been taken as governing equations the discretization of con
vective fluxes and the lime marching are compleled by Jameson scheme and the live-step Runge-Kutta ileration method re
spectively and one equation Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model has been employed. The rotor is modeled as a distribution
of momenlum source to simulale lhe ground effecl more realistically the boundary of "moving ground" is used instead of lhe
conventional "stationary ground" and the grids near the rotor plane and between the rotor and the ground are refined to cap
ture the ground vorlex more accurale. Considering the molion and control of the rolor in lhe actual flighl environmenl lhe ro
tor trim is taken into account in the simulation of the rotor flowfield. The aerodynamic forces of trim equations are given by
coupling of CFD method and momentum-blade element theory model. In order to improve the robustness and efficiency of the
trim melhod lhe genelic algorilhm/quasi Newlon hybrid ileralive algorithm is proposed and eslablished. Firstly the method
is used to calculate the rotor thrust increment and rotor power required in ground effect. The calculated results are compared
wilh lhe experimental results aimming al verifying the validity 01 lhe method lhe problem of ramp incremenl of rotor power
required at a low speed flight has been solved which is difficult for wake analysis methods. Then the flowfields of UH-60A
helicopter rolor in dilferent flight heighls dilferenl advance ralios have been calculated meanwhile the dilference 01 lhe rolor
power required induced velocity ground vortex and rolor control are invesligaled. The calculaled results show thal lhe
ground vortex appears at small advance ratio; with increase of the advance ratio it moves along inflow direction in the longi
tudinal plane and moves close to lhe ground in axial direclion then it becomes weak conlinuously and linally disappears
Key words: rotor; in ground effecl; unsteady aerodynamic characterislics; ground vortex; lrim analyses; Navier-Stokes
equations
Received: 2015-09-03; Revised: 2015-11-24; Accepted: 2015-12-04; Published online: 2015-12-25 13:23
URL: www.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1929.V.20151225.1323.002.html
Foundation item: National Natural Science Foundation 01 China (11272150)
Corresponding author. Tel. 025-84893753 E-mail: zhaoqijun@nuaa.edu.cn