Daniel 1 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

0 3$ 0 W Daniel
1 . - 3 0 / 7 6
0 ( /
11

( / 3 $ 0 I
6 3 0

12
3 0 ( 0 1
3 / / ( 0 $ - " $
2
6 3 3 6
13
3 I 6 ( 30 1 /. -
3 $ 0 / 6 3 3 7
14
( 3 0 3 0 3 9 $ 9 ( 3
15 ( 3 3 3
$ 3 ( 0 6 3
0 I 3 6 3 9 / $
3 ( $ / D 3" 3 (A
4
7 /3 6
16 0 3

/( 3
3 $ 3 - .3 1
3/ I 36 6 .
17 7 I/ 3 6 6 3 0 6 /
" 9 ( 3 3 3 $ 0 ( 3 0 /
5
3 3 $ ( 1 . -
0 6 0 (
18 6 6 3 I 7
6 3 3 0 $ 3( . $
6
[ 3 ] \ I / 6
19 3 ( 3 $
7
[ 3 0 3 0$ 0 3 0 " (
20
3( 7/ 6 3 $ . 3- 3 7
0 ( 3 3 $ A D3 0 6 3 3 0
8
7 I [ 6 0 ( 3 I 3 6 0 " /
3
21
0 A 6 ( 3 $ 3 6
9
( ( 0 ( / I 3
9 6 3 0 $ 3
10
( - / I 6
[ (
7 6 2 / 0 3 I 3 0 6 0

1 Daniel 2
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 2

e $ 3 9 f [ 0 $
12 2
3 ` ( e ( / _ . /
$ 0 6 / [ - 7 6

13
( 3 ( 0 /$ `/ 3(
3
3( $ " / 0 $

4
0 A "
14
3 37 0 6 3 3 ` 0 $ 6 9
$ f 9 ( (
15 5
3 3 7 6 3 3I 6 3
( 6 $ 3 I 6
( $ 9 e 3 6 3 (
16 6
3 3 $ f .3 I 3 6 0 d AI
0( 3 3 $ `3 6 e
17 7
9 ( 3 3 0$ _ 0 ( 3 0 d 0( $
( 0 " 3 ( ` ( 3
18 8
6 9 0 7 3 6 e 03 3I 6 6
3 c $ I / 6 3 6 0 ( $ e
19 9
9 7 ( 3 0 3 ( ( 3
0 $ 9 6 6 3 ( 3 1 . [ - 0 7
20
3 9 ( 3I 36 a
. I 6 6
6 9 . 3 I 3 9 3 ( 3$ 73
$ " ( 6 9 ` ( 3
21 10
3 _ 3I 6 0[ 0 . I 3 e6
( 3 3 $ I 3 0 6 f I
6 ( 3 6 73 f 6 0$ e
( 3 $
22
I 6 3
11
6 0 (3 / ( . I
3 6 e 6 (
c We read one or more accents in L differently than
BHS. Often this notation indicates a typographical a Adaptations to a Qere which L and BHS, by their
error in BHS. design, do not indicate.

Daniel 2 2
Daniel 2 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

3I 06 6 0 . ( 3 6 . ( 3 3 9 0 7 I 3
23

3( 3 $ 33 6 0 "
32
6 7 3 3 $ I 6 6 3 (
0 ( $ ( 3 ( 3 7 36
24
e
33
$ ` f
3 6 3 ( I 3 3 $ 0 3 0 3 7
0 3 0 7 _ AI 6 6
34
3 6 6 e 6 3
25
I 6 ( 9 I 03 (
35
$ 3 3 ( 3 3 e 6
0 W 1 . - I 6 $ 3 0 3 7
0 7 0 6 3 I 3I 6 ( (
26
0 $ 0 6 3I 6 3 (
7 0 ( 3 3$ 73
36 27
( 3 3 3 3" [ ( 0
37
e qn ( 3 3 e ( $ 6
$ f 9 ( 3 " 7 [ 6
38 28

( 0( W D 9I
3 . I 6 0 _ 3 6 6 3 7
qn
$ ( 93 0 $ . 3(
39
3 ( 0 7 ( ( 3
29
e 0 1A$ . I qn 7 6
e 6 ( ( 93 0 3 $ 3"
30
93( 6
40
93 0 7 I 6 (
73 I 6 $ e 6 ( 9 $ (
73 6 I 6
n Marks an anomalous form. 31
q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to ( qn 7 3
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
n Marks an anomalous form. n Marks an anomalous form.
q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS. BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where n Marks an anomalous form.
there might be a question of the validity of the form q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to
and we keep the same form as BHS. BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

3 Daniel 2
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 2

$ ( 3 I 3 3 6/ (
49 41
3 6 7 I - 3 ( 3 / 0
0 6 f ( 3
7 D30 k I 6
0 3 $ 3 ( 3 I 6 9 3
3 6 e
( ( 9$ 3
0 ( . 0
3 7 0 6 3 42
6 ( 3
6 6 3 $ 0 3 3
2 3 0 $ I 6 93
43
93( 0 7
W W 0 W
6 6 0 I 9 6 d
0 W 0 1 .I
0 9 (d
6 3 / /3 $
$ 3 (
3 3 6 0[ ( 0 3 ( 44
3 " 7 1 D
3
W 0 W 3 W
I 6 9 . I 6
0 W 0 1
( e $ I .
. - 37 / 6 /3
3 6 3 (
0[ ( 0 3 $ 45
W 1 3 0 e
6 e 3 ( 0 3
4 _ . . - 7
3 $ I
5
I 6 0 9 ( 6
6 [ W ( 93 0 3 $

W _ 3
3 ( (
. I 3 6 / / 3 _ 3 I 6
46

0 ( $ I 6 3 $ 6 / 0 (
6
30 3 ( ( 3 1 3 . 3- 7 /6
47

[$ 0 3 ( 9 0 7 9 " 9 ( 3
7
3 W 3 W e 3 $ 3 3 (
W 1 . - 9 . - 3 7 .
48

I 6 3 / 3 . 3 3 I 6
$ . - [ 7
6 0 ( 0 3 (
k We read one or more consonants in L differently from
BHS.

Daniel 3 4
Daniel 3 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

3 6 0 3 $ I 3 6 3 e
8

0" . [ $ 0 ( 3 (
17
0 3 7 9 6 6 0 3 0 6 $
9

" . 3 $ 10
( 9 ]
18
( 3 3 W W 9 3 \
q
( 9 3 $ I 3 6 _ / . I
" 0 ( 3 6 / / 3 $ ( 3
19
3 . [ ( 0 3 3
11
[ ( 0 (

- 9 7 3I 6 6 ( `3 [$
( 3 0 3 $ I
12
D [ 7
3I 6 3 3 . 6 ( 0 6
20
6 ( 0 3 3 3 [ I 3 6

3 0 3 $ [ 3 7 .
3 0 6 ( 3 0 3 0I 6 3 3 6
21
$ `3 ( 3 - ( 0 3 ( " 0

3 6 [ 3 7 6 6 6 3 I
13

` 3 y [ 3 $ 0 0 6 ( 3 0 3
22
3 7 ( e 6 [ 3 3 e ( $ 3 6
I 6 3 3 D 3I [ 6 `
14

I $ [ 3 7 I 6 6
( 3 0 3 $ 3 7 I 3 6
3 6 0 3 ( " 0 ( 0 3 (
23
[ I 3 6 3 ( D " 3 3 0 7
15

( 3 0 3 $ W W
A y W 3 1 / . -
24
9 6 6 / 3 7 ]
$ 3 . - 7 0 1 0 63 3 \
[ . - I 3 6 ( $
16
9 ( 3 1 3 0 7 I
and we keep the same form as BHS.
q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to y Yathir readings in L which we have designated as
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS. Qeres when both Dothan and BHS list a Qere.
y Yathir readings in L which we have designated as 1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where
Qeres when both Dothan and BHS list a Qere. there might be a question of the validity of the form

5 Daniel 3
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 3

9 $ ( 25
AI 6 3
33

0 6 6 . 3- [ 7 6 6 7 0
6 3 $ 0 $

3 ( 36 3 3
26
3 7 3 - 9
0 7 3I 06 3 3 4 ] \ 3 7
2
A 3 ( 3 0 3 0$ ( 0 3 9 . 3 "
3 / 6 3( [ 9 $ 3 7 (
27
0 [ 6 3
3
3 0 ( 3 ( _
/ 3 $ ( 0 D 0 ] 3
[ 3 7 [6
4 \ A [ 3 W 1 3 .
3 $ 7 I 7 I 3 6 -
0 6 e 3 3 ( 3 $ 3 (
28
e W 3 1 . 3- I 3
5 0 3 . - 7 I
( 3 6 [ 9 9 I 3 6 0 3 9 0 6
( $ 3 I 0 3 6 3 (

6 0 $ I 6
3 3 ] [ \
7_ y I 6
0 3 7 _ 9 I 6 29
3 3 $ .3 " 0 1 9 3 3 0 ] 3 \
7
3 9 3( 3 $ 6 [ - 7 I 3 .
3 0 3 0( ( ( 3 9 0 7 I 3 6 0 3
8 73 0 3 3 3$ e
6 3 ( $ 3
9 9 e [ ( I 6
( I3 0 3 30
3 7 (
6 3 . / $ 3
3 0 ( 3 (

/- 3 3 7 6 6 31
7 D ["
0 3 3 ( 6
10 ( (
3( 03 3( 3 32
$ 0 6 3 6 f 0
11
. 3 - 3 7 I/ 6
y Yathir readings in L which we have designated as
Qeres when both Dothan and BHS list a Qere.

Daniel 4 6
Daniel 4 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

20
A ( 0 W ( 3 $ 3
W . 1/ [I 3 6
12

- 7 . I 6 6 . I 6 6
[ 9 6 [ 9 6
$ " 7 ( $ I 6 3
13
3I 6 0 3 (
0 3 0 ( 3 6
21
( 0 ( $ I 3 0 ( 3 3$
14
6 ( ( ( ( 0 I 3
22
W 3 0 3 $ ( 6 3

1 9 .3 /- ( W _ .
0 7 I 6 ( - 07 yI
0$ qn 7
3 6 ( 0 (

I 6 qn 0 ( 0 6 0 3 0
15
23
3 0 7 D I 3 $ . 3 -
$ 6 6 3 6 3 7 9 7 e
24
( 3 7 3 I 6 [
6 0 0 6 16
( 9 . 3- 9
[ 0 0A$ 3 93( 6 0 3 3 7
25
3 / / / 0 [ 3$ 3 . - 7
3 6 I 3 6 0 3I

"
$ 3 ( 3 0
26
3 6 ` (
17
27
( ( 3 0 3I ( 3 6
6 0 ( $ 6 3 0 ( $ 3
18
I 9 6 3 ( 0 3I 6 0 3
28
( 7 6 [ /7 3 . / $ 3
$ I 6 3 ` A 0 ( 3 6
19
n Marks an anomalous form.
(
q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to 6 $ 3 I
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.
n Marks an anomalous form.
q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to y Yathir readings in L which we have designated as
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS. Qeres when both Dothan and BHS list a Qere.

7 Daniel 4
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 4

2 29
0 3 7 3 3 D 1 . 0 ( A 0
6 6 3 0 I 3 6 " /7 I - 3
$ 0 3 6 0 (
7 6 3 3 qn
0$ 7 I 6
3
0 6 3 33 3 7 3
( 0
30
9 ( 3 7 3 0 7 ]
$ 7 6 I \ 0
4
3 3 3 3 $ _ ( 3 $ 6 [ 3
3 D3 0 " ( ( ( 3 ( (
5 31
0 7 6 6 6 1 0 . -
6 e 3 ` 9 3 7 6 0
( 3 $ 3 ( 6 3 ( 3
6
( 9 I 6 d $ 3 I 6 3 3
32
$ I 3 3 6 / / 1 0 3 I 3 6 (

7
. [ 3 ( A I 3 6 0 37 3 6 3
6 3 3 3 3 $ I 6
33
$ 3 . - 3 7 3( 3 ( 0 3 D
D 3 7 3 6 _ 9 I 6
- 0 7 .
k 7 I 0 ` ( $
34
( 0 6 3 ( ( D
8
9 6 6 / 3 6 0 7 . I 3

$ 0 I 6 3 / I 0 6 6
9
3 ( _ 9 I / 3 $ 6 3
3 6 d A 0 $
10
` e .3
3 5 7 0 6

3I 6 ( 3
0$ e ( 3 (
1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where
there might be a question of the validity of the form
and we keep the same form as BHS. n Marks an anomalous form.
k We read one or more consonants in L differently from q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to
BHS. BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

Daniel 5 8
Daniel 5 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

6 ( e $ $ 0 . - 0 7 6
7 6 3 9 0 6
18 11
0 3 $ 9 6 _ . - 7
6 I 0 7 " 39 ] 3 \
19
[ ( 0 6 9 (
/ 7 [ 6 0 3 $ 3 I [ 6 0 "
. -3 $ 0 ( 0 e [ 7 6 0 3
12
I 3 6 0 3 0 73 0 W3 W
0 ( e
( 3 0( 0I 3 6 0 0 W W 1 0 .
6 3 3
20
0 - 3 7 I 3 6
0 $ 6 3 3 3 ( 3 3$
21 3( 3 ( 03
0 . - ( 3 31 13
6 7 1 0 3 3 6 3 [ e $ 3 . 3 6
I 6 0 3 ( 3 - 37 I 36
3 $ 7 D 3I 6 ( (
14
9 I 6 0 (
3 0 (
22
3 ( 3 0 I 3 6 9 $ " (
15
`3 (3 ( 3 $ e ( D [ 7
3
23
6 I 6

. 3- W 3 [ $ 0 (
16
y
7 . - 0 0 6 3 0
3 3 ] ] \ 3 3 k $ 3 (
_ 0 . - 7 W 3 1 . - 7 3 3 6

_ "A ( $ [ 7
3 D ( 3 / ( k 0 6 ( I
6 e
24
3 ( 3 6
17
3 37 6 e 3 -
1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where
there might be a question of the validity of the form k We read one or more consonants in L differently from
and we keep the same form as BHS. BHS.
y Yathir readings in L which we have designated as k We read one or more consonants in L differently from
Qeres when both Dothan and BHS list a Qere. BHS.

9 Daniel 5
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 5

. - $ 2
1 $ (
3 6 3 7 e ( $ 3( 3 ( 3
5
6
6 ( 0 _ 9 $ ` 3
26

[ I 3 6 " 3( 27
$ 3 9 (
$ `3 ( 0 (
7
( / (
_ 9 I 0 6 9 3 28
$ 3 6
3 $ 6 3 3 29
8 ( 3 0 3 7
(A ( 9 - /
I 3 6 (
I 0 6 3 7
0 0 $ 3
0 I 6 30
93( f 3
9 $ 3 _
A 9 . 9 - 7 6 3 3 ` 3 (
9
`3 /
( 9 [ $ "
( ( (
3 $ qn
6 6 6
10
3 $ 6 3 e 2
( 3 6 e
11
( 9 _ 3 . - 0 6 0
I 6 3 . ( 3
$ ( 9 d I 3
A $ 1 . 3 6 3 ( 3 $ 6
3 7 3I - 9 D d 0 3 7 0 I 6
3 3 6 0
6 e 9 3 e 3 4
93( 9 6 6
12
_ 9 [ I 3 6 3 0
3$ ( 3 A 73 I 6 3 0$ e
13
e ( 9 3 _ 3 . ( e 0 0 3
\ 0 " 9 7 ] 9 5
9 . - 0 7 0 .
. 9 - W 3 1 9 9 " ( 3
A `3 7 6 3
3 . - 7 " $ 1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where
there might be a question of the validity of the form
( ( and we keep the same form as BHS.
14 n Marks an anomalous form.
3 _ 3 0 ] e \ q We have abandoned or added a ketib/qere relative to
BHS. In doing this we agree with L against BHS.

Daniel 6 10
Daniel 6 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

3 0
24
3 3 7 6 7 3W 1 3 . -
3 0 [ $ [ . . 0I 6 3 9
6 3 3- [ 7 0 $ I 6 3
25 15
3 3 0 7 D 3 ( 9 . - " 7 3
3 I 6 6 [ I 3 6 0 3 0 " 3 ( 6
I/ 6 3 3 $ 6 3 0( 3 $ 3
16

D [ 7 _ I 6 6 [ 3 3 6 3
26

A 3 3 - $ 7 I
A 7 _ D [" (
6 6 9
( ( ( 3 (
17
3 \ ]
27
3 e 0 7 6 3 -
9 Id 6 0
7 3 ` [ $ 3I
e 9 3 3$ 9 6 3 9 7 I
6 7 6 3 6
3
18
28
3 3 3A 3 6 6 0 [
7 3 6 $ [ [ $ . - 37 6
3 3 f 3(
19
3
29
3 _ 9 0 . I 3 3 6


A$ ( 0A 3 $ 3 (
20
0 3
$ . [ (
7 0 7 3 6 21
0 3 [ 3 (
$ 3 33 6 0 3( 3 3 0 $ 3 . - 37
2
6 ( 3 0 3I 3 6
30 6 3 6 9 9 7
$ 3 6 3( 03 3 6 ( 3 I 3
( 3 0 7 6 9 6 6
22
3
I 3 6 $ 23
$ ( 9 9 D
4
A ( 3 ( 0 37 0 [ ( $
$ 3 0 W3 1 . - I 6 73 I 6 6 e
7 6 6 9 ( 0 6

11 Daniel 7
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 7

3 ( 9 3 0$ 0 5
e ( 9 ( 0 3 1
6 I e . - 7/ 6
14
3 . I 6 e ( [ 3 $
/ 7 [ 3 $ 6 3 ( 0 [ (
3 D I 6 3 3 - 3 0 7 3 0 I e 6
6
.

( . ( $
15
( 0( 3 $ I 3 6 3 (
16
3( 3 0 [ 73 6 1 3. 0 - 3 3 3 7
7

3 3 $ 0 ( 0 3 W 1 3 .
17
( 3 6 0 ` - 7 . ( 6
3 ( $ ( 9 $
18
6
( 6 7 3
8
$ I 6 3 (A 0 . 0 - 3 7
19
( 9 7 6 _0 e I 3 6 33 3
( 6 0 3 7 6 0
$ 3 7 I e $ 0 . - 3I 0 6
6 0 9
[ ( 3 0 7 3
20
( 1 I I 6 ( $

0 6 3 e 6 6 0 7 I 3 3 3
( e $ . 3- 3 6 3 (
10
7 [ 6 ( 7 3I 3 6 e
21
3 0 3 3 ( I 6 3 (
22
$ ( ( $
11
0 7 6 3 6 3 0 3 3 7
$ 9 ( ( 9$ 3 0 W 3 1
23
] 3 0\ 3 6 I . I 3 6
12
6 93 ( 3 3 ( 6 3
6
3 [ $ $ " (
13
1 BHS has been faithful to the Leningrad Codex where ( 3I 06 3 3 3 0 6
there might be a question of the validity of the form
and we keep the same form as BHS.

Daniel 7 12
Daniel 7 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

$ . ( ( 3 ( 3 3 24
0 6
6
3 7 / 6 6 0 ( [ $ e D
/3 3 [ $ (A 3 0 ( I 6 3 3 ( 0 3 7
7 25
/ D 3 7 7 I 6
I 3 6 A 3 6 3$ 7 ( 3
$ / 0 / 3 ( / 6 0 3 (
3I 6 6 A 3 /( 26
( $ 3
8
( / $ (
7 6 0 - f - 7
27
.
( I 6 6 `
9
3 ( 6 /6 $ 3 3
(A $ 28
( 3
10
$ 0 . 3-
$ ( 3 ( 0 ( 0 [ 7 6
11
3 ( 3

$ 6 6 [
8 3 $
12
( ( 3
$ 3I 9 6
13 D I 3 6 0 3 0 3 (
( $ 3 2
/ 3 ] \ 6
/ 1 . - 73
0 6 0 3 $
D I 6 /3 3
14
( 6 0 (
(/ / 3 f 3
3 I 3 6
/ 3 $
15 7 /3 3( [ A$
/ 7 / 0 ( 3 $ A /7 6 / 3
0 3 /( 3 3 4
16 ./ / 0 / W
( 3 $ 6 /
1 3 . - 7 6
( 3 / `3 ( 3 $ ( /
17
6 / 3 / 5
0 3 7 3I
$ I / 3 6 3 6 I 0 6 3

13 Daniel 8
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 8

4 18
0$ ( 3 ( ( 3
7 I 0 /6 ( 9 $ / $ . 0 3
I 3 6 /I 3 6 ( 3 0
19
6 / 6 0
5
/0 / ( 3 d ( 0 $ ( 3
20
$ ( d 3 ( 0 A$
6 21
I / 6 6 0 3 ( (
( 3 0 I 6 A$ I 6 0 3 3
7 22
I 3 0 /$ 3 ( ( . 0 ( /
0 /6 (/ $ $ " [ (
I 6 3 23
( / / 0 6 0 /
D3 / /7 0 6 ( ( 3 3 / $ 0 /
0 0 0 ( 0 / / / (
24
I 6
8
f / ( 3 7 $ ( 0
0 ( 0 /$ 3 3 / 7 I 6
25
9
0 $ ( / 9 3 $
10
/ (
0 / I 6
I / 6 0 3 9 $ 3 3 .3 " / 0 (
26
11
0 ( 73 6 9 9 $ 6 /
` /$
27
( 0 37 3I 9 6 3 6
. 3 - [ 7 0 I 6 ` 9 $
6 / 9 ( 3 ( 3 ( 3
12
- 0
0 ( 3 7 I / 36 6
3 /$ 0 / 7 f 3 9 7 A 0
0 ( A $ 0 (
2
/ 0 I 6
13
I 6 0 6 3
3 ( / 3$ / / $ 7 0 . I
6 - 3 9 73 6 /
3
14
3 0 d 3 0 I/ 6 ( (
3$ D /6 9 ( 3
7 0

Daniel 9 14
Daniel 9 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

0 6 0 ( / / $ /6 9 73
25 15
/ (/ 3 . 3- / 0 / 9 73
- 3 I 6 6 / 7 6 I 6 6 3. 01
0 ( 3 $ [ $ [ D
6 0 16 /7 /6 6 I 7 6
26
6 0 3( $ 0 I 3 [ 6
0 d 0 /3 " ( 3 3 $ . -/ _ I 0 36 6
/3 I 6 6 3
17

27
I 6 9 /3 ( 9 73
0 3 $ 3 $ 0 . -
] 0 \ 7 . AI 6 /3 18
0 / .3 9 (
6 9 /3 3 7 3 6 / /3 `
0 ( $ /
10 7 6 6 6
06 63 /37 0 . I
19
0 ( 0 /I 6 6
3 0 ( 3$
0 / 0 / 0 ( 0 3
9 I 6 6
2 $ 0 9
$ 3 0I ( 20
0I 3 6 .
[ 3 6 3 (
3 3 6
$ 3 7 6 3 9 0 [ D / 7 ( A
` / $ / ( / 21
0 ( 3 (/ 9
[ (
4 0 1 . $ W3
( / $ I 6 [ /3 3 3
0 7 " ( 22
5 3 $ ` /
3 3( 6
I 3 ( ( `3
$ ( 0[ ( 23
6 7 0 6 . 0 -
( 0 $ 6 7 D I 3
6 3 6 3 3 // 6 24
3 [ . - (
3 / $ ( (
7 7 3 . -
0 1 . 3I 6
3 d I 3 6

15 Daniel 10
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 10

[
0
19
A3 - / " 0 6 0 ( /

( 0 0$ I k 6 $ 0 7 0 I / 6
8
( 3 0 / ( / 0 3 A 3 3 0 6
20
7 / 0 6 6 7 I / 6 /
3 3 $ I 6 ( / $/ 7
9
21
3( A 0 6 0 3 ( / /
( 9 $ .3 - $ 6 0 7
10
( 3 3 3I 6 ( ( 3
( A $ ( 3
11
[ .3 / 3 W 3 _ 0
- 0 1 /. /I 3 3 6 6 0 /
0 6 A $ 11 ( [ 3$ (
2
0 ( ` 9 12
( ( /
- / $ 3 1 . 3] 3 \
0 I / 6/ 7 6 0 . " " 7
/ 3 ( 3( 9 $
3
A $ 6 13
0 7
4
6 3 /I 3 6 3 73
3 ` $ / ( / $ 3 0 6
I / 6 0 I 0 7
6 6
14
3 ( 3
3 6 0 3 0 3 0 ( 0
5
3 9( A $ 9I 15
$ (
6
6 ( I 3 $ 3 "
6 7 6 3 /3
16
9 3 7 6
0 3 $ / D / 6 0 6 / $ 7
7 I / 0 /6 / 3. I /3 0 /7 6 I
7
/ 0 6 6
17
( / / 3 7 6
3( $ / 7 6 / / $ 0I I 0 /6 3 0
( 6 3 6 6 / 0 / ( /
18
k We read one or more consonants in L differently from
BHS.
0 "/ ( 3

Daniel 11 16
Daniel 11 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

21 8
I 6 /( 3 1 W 9 k 3
$ 9 ( 3 . - " $
22 9
0 (/ 7 0 / 6
( $ 3 ( 6
23 10
3 0 (
0 6 7 6
24
$ ( D $ ( / 0 (
11
3 ] \ 7 0 . / [ 6
I 0/ 6 0 0/ " ` (
$ " ( 3 $ 9 6 (
25 12
3 1 /. - / 3 ( $
] \ 7 13
/ ( / 6
6 ( . 3 9 $
( / 0 / /$ I 6 (
26
0 / 3" ( 3 (
14

0 ( $ 3 A$ 3 3 7
27
6 3 I 3 15
0 ( 6 /
( $ 3 / [ /6 0 $ /I
28
I / 6 ( 3 3 6 ( 3 / 6 6 / 0 /
$/ ( 0/ . I 3 6 ( 3
16

29
A$ / ( 3 ( $ 0 ( / 3
30 17
- . ( / 0 / 3 _ D " /
I 6 ( 6 ( $ I
$ 3 / 3 ( /( ( / 0 /
31 18
D / / 0 / $ " 3
3 I 6 ( $ . I 6
32 19
3 0 ( 3
( 3 3
0 $ / ( 3 9 0 ( 20
$ ( ( / 3 "
33
3 $ D $ I 0 ( 3
( " 0 6 3 ( / ( /

17 Daniel 11
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex Daniel 11

12 3 1
34
-3 0 / . 3 3 $ "
35
7 /3 ] 3 \ 6 3 0 0 3
0 I / 6 3 7 ( ( 3
36
3 $ I 3 6 . $ 3 3 3 3
( 3 ` 3 3(
2 3 6 3 - 7 I 3
$ f 3 3 ( 3 0 3 6 3 3 $ 6 6
37
.
3
(
I 3
( 9 9 9
/ $ 6 3 0/ 6 / (
38

( 9 / $ ( / 9 6 6
3 0 ( / 37 " /
4 [ $ 3 9 - 0 " /
$ 3 / ( ( 3 [ 0 /7 3 ( (
39
0 3 3 (A
5
6 6 0 [ D I 3 [ 6
0 3 / $ ( 36 6 / 3 0 ( $ 9
6 ( 3 0 6

7 / 6 ( 3 ( / 40
0 ( 3 3 / $ 3 7 3 I 6
7 3 . - 7 6 6
( 3 D
0 e $ (
7 0 ] 3 3 41
\ . I 6 / / ( 6
- 0 3 $ 1 3 . $ 3 36 6 9
42
73 ( 3 / ( 3 3( ( 0 $
43
0 ( / $ /
8
3 ( / 3 7
3 0 ( 0 `/ 6 3 / 0 [
/ 3 3$ [ " 0 [
9 [ [ ( $
44
3 _ 0 I
10
( 3 [ 0 [
( / 6 $ 6 3 / (
45
3 6 3
11
$ 0 6 e ( 3
3 /$ 3 ` $/ 6 ( 3
12 3
( 3 (
$ ` ` ( 3 (

Daniel 12 18
Daniel 12 The Westminster Leningrad Codex

13

/ ( 0 $ 3 3 0
( 3 /

End of Daniel

19 Daniel 12
 The Westminster Leningrad Codex
Version 4.18

Daniel

Attributed to:
Shemu'el ben Ya'akov
Aharon ben-Mosheh ben-Asher
ca 1008

Active maintenance of machine-readable version:

Stephen K. Salisbury, Editor
steve@grovescenter.org

Kirk E. Lowery, Senior editor

kirk@grovescenter.org

Transcription to Unicode/XML:
Christopher V. Kimball
transcriber@tanach.us

Edition:
Unicode/XML Westminster Leningrad Codex
http://www.tanach.us/Tanach.xml

Transcribed by WLC2XML of 6 Jun 2010 at 13 Jun 2013 @ 21:30.36. Build number:

24.0. Converted to ODT by XML2ODT.xml dated 22 Dec 2010 on 2013.06.14-07.22.
Build number: 24.2 . 20 pages. Layout: Full; Content: Accents.

This document is in the public domain.

20