Professional Documents
Culture Documents
t DFFINlTIONS
PAYBACK
c 3. 'fihe lcnglh n r iil!lie rcttuin:d l{lr ;,m ip\.'c slmcni ln gepcmre c :;J:o;h ~l.ilW<i -o;tJi llic1epl lin
rec.:n\:e.- the in ii1;,IH ..::n, ~ ~)r 11 he 1n\.'c:o.;f mc.n'l i:o.; c~lle1 i 1-tc:
a. net pt'es.e~1t \'alue.
lh. ipkmal nlie n.r re rum.
c pa.ybad:: period.
d. pn.Jlii!.~bi l iiy index.
e. cli $-C~llll nled ctJsh petiiml.
PAYBACK RULE
~ 4. \Vhich nne .f..lf mhe fnlluwi ng :o.;iJUemcni s is c.:m,-ed c~mcem1 ng th payfNtCik perind?
Ja. An i pv~;."iimen1 is ~~cc.:epa1~blc if i rt c::tltt!ibled p~yh!.lr.:k period isle '' ilrJ;,m :'i nme pre-
-o;pec.:i mi t."C'lr ['(!rind nf i1m ~'
lh. An ipvt."iimen1 shmdd he nocepmed if ihe ~yhm:k is pnsiiive ;,nd rejected i r 1 ~ i-o;
neg::~Jt ive.
C'. A n i nvc~l mc:nt S;nnuld he ruj,ecl00 iHhc p~yh;n.: k i :s pus11 i vc ~Uild :j)CCL'l'lkid i r i mj<;
11C~liln1 ve.
d. A n i nvc~l ment is ut:cepm Jhlc if ~' (;:alcu i~ted p:ayh.:~e k peri.,)d j:oo; grc'"der mhmiJ sum(!' .Pire-
-;pecili G'tLpennd nfli m ~.
An i nvc-c:l meQI sl'muld !he ltC<.:eplc:d any i ime the puy1:mc'k period is IC:$<; ln:m l he
di~fiU n l ed. p~lyh:lck pe-rilld, gi\te n Jl pn!'ilive d i$<!fll!l nl mJe.
DISCOUNTED P A\"BACK
c 5. Tihe lc ngJh n f lime required. r<~..n a pmjccfs dio;cftl!lnlod (;il<;h ~ltJW" li n equal m
hc in11iul
cnsl n f lilru: pmj ee l i-; c;)Ued I he;
Ill. nd p1'c~nl v:alue.
b. i nlem:al r:ale M rem
um.
c. payback period.
d. d iscounted profitability index.
c. diiscotmtcd p aybilCk period.
b. 9. The di-;cmm~ m re t h:a1t makes ihe rn: l prc,c;enr \ ':;tl ue nf :m 1n \IC:simenl e:u~ i ly cqi,Ud Ito
~C"IiU i<i c~alled lllc;
a. external rnte of return.
h. i nlarnrd r:aJc ~lf remtllifl .
c. ~vc-mgc ;u:ouunl1n,g rc i urn.
d. p ll'u1ii tlb11il y in ex .
c. e[~ual izer.
U. CO CEPTS
ET PRESE T VALUE
b ~ 8. Nt'l pn.""ienm \'ulu :
a. :.mnO( be used when deciding bet""'cen two mutuaHy cxdushc projects.
b. is more rn ~cful to dct'ismon malk.crn. than d:te intcmru rate of rctmn \\rhcn compadng
ditlerent sized projc1:ts.
c. is easy to explain to non-t1nancial managcr.s ;md tbus is lhe primary method of analysis
used by the lowest le.,.rds of m;magcmcnt.
d. is not an as widely used tool as payback and discoll!lntcd payback
c. lllililf in its mclhodology to lhc average account~ng return.
is ' 'cry siL
PAYBACK
c ~ 9. Payback is mqucnt~y l!lscd to ~llllal)'7..e htdepcndcnt pmjc.('ts because:
il. it considers lhc tim-e val~JC of money.
b. all rdcvant cash t1ows i.lfC induded in th-e tl.IIDiysms.
(;, it is easy and Qll!lick to calculate.
d. it is the mo&t dcsinili1c of aU the a"LlHabk: amu}tk al methods from a t1n;md ru
perspective.
c. it produce'S beucr decisions tb:.m those made using cJ ther NPV oc :IRR.
!PAVBAt~K
c 20. l ' hc ad"'illltagcs. of the :payback method of project illJalysis indude the:
t D!pplkation of a discount rate to each separate cas!h tlow.
It bias towards ~iq11 idhy.
~ l J. case of use.
~ V. a.ubiu;y-y cutoff point.
a.. I and II Oil ~y
b. .I and II I on ~y
c. 11 and JD on~y
d. 'I I und IV n11ly
e, II, Ill, and IV nnl y
PA BACK
d 2 1. A 11 e1se cc1~Lal, i he p.ui}'hack peril..nJ fnr ~ prtlje~;;i wi11 dtl"Teu ' wihene ver rhe;
<l. i nif i:a.l .t~)sf in re:t..;e:t-;,
b. required return for a pmjcct ncrcas~.
c. ~~ -;igned di ~nU111i Jr<de d.e t'rens.e ' ,
d, C'ISh in rJ n W' Jar~ 1110\1txl f.orw~mJ i 11 ri me ,
e, d.ru.r;,iiun n f u p!rojet:i is l cngf hene~i
DISCOUNTED PAYBACK
d
--
'J'')
tlt
Tbc- d i ' m ti11iCd p:~~yh:lck period nf Ill ]ll'Uj'-~ "''ill tlet:rea:t-;e
di " 1C1Ui11i r:de ::tppl ied m~) i lfte prnje~i i " i ocreasetl,
wt.t~ne\er rhe:
DISCOUNTED PAYBACK
a 23. The d:Ls.countcd payback ru[c ~IWJY carus.e:
a.. orne posithc net pliC ent \o':liue projects ~o be rejected.
b. d1c mo::.t IU quid projects lo be rcj cctcd in favor of less liqt~ id projects.
c. proje-c~s to llx: incorre-ctly ~cpted dl!tC to grmring the time v~ue of money.
d. proje-cts with negative net pre:scnt value:s to be accepted.
-c. some p~jects to be a~epted whkh would omhcnvis.<: be rejected under the payback
rule.
INTER AL RA TB OF Rl:: R
r 26. l'he inter nail rate of return is:
;,t, molic reli ~lh1e :a..o; ~ decisiu111 m~ai.Ji ng ~~~lll mlhun lilcl presc nI val uc- whcrae\t-r you ;il.re
mn ick-riqg n'mfUull y e t: In i \ 1c pmjeel-;,
b. equivalent to the discount rntc th..1l mnkcs the net present 'ln~oe equal to one.
c. diffic!Jllt to compute without the usc of either a nnanc~al calculator m a computer.
d. dependent upon the interest rates oftered ~n the mnrkcti place.
e. u bctiL'T' mc'l'hod()lngy lhun net pn:,.elll \ 1ulnc when dc..ding wilh uncn:n venmitmal c:a..;lh
t1mvs.
INTER AL RA TB OF Rl:: R
a 27. l'he inter nail ITtle of return tends to be;
a. easier for managers to comprehend thnill the net present va.h.1c.
b. extremely accurate C'\'Cn whcn cash tlow estimates arc faulty.
c. ignored by mostti nrn1ciaJ rnml_yst:s .
d. U"iod primari ~)' to diffcrcntbtc bct,.~ccn mutually e.xch.1:shrc P~.i ccts.
c. utilized in projc"Cm;:mn1)"5ls only when mu~tiple net pres.enl vaBrues. apply.
PROFITA81LIT\' D:EX
d 30. The profitabmty index ~s d osdy rdatcd to:
:1. payback.
b. d i counted paybar k.
<:. ihc ~'i,:crugc :;tC'cmmli ng rci urn ,
d. 111e rreserd '!,.-;til ue.
c. muu.mlly cxdusive wrojccts.
PROF1TA81LITY D:E
b 3 t. Anallysis using the profitability ndex:
:1. frcquendy oonili cts with the: accept and Kjc:ct dedsions generated by the application of
the net present value rnk.
b. is usd111l as a decision tool '1.\tlen investment f11.mds ru-e ~intitcd.
c. is us.cful }vhen trying to detemJj nc which one ot' two mu ttmUy ex.dushe pJrOjC(:l:S
shoold be accepted.
d. uti~ izes the :same basic vari abk:o. as those used in the a,,.crn,gc accmml ing rctiJm.
c. fPI OOU(:CS reslll!~ts \.'1-'hkh l:yfPtc<illy arc difficult to comprehend or app~y.
PROFITA81LITY D:EX
e 32. :If you wanl to rc"'ic"\' a projC(:t from a bcnciil~ost peupcctive. )'01.11 shouldlus.c lhc
_ _ method of ana~ys~s.
a. net present value
b. paybac:k
C. i ntcrmd rate of return
d. avcrngc acc:omllh ng return
c. profitability ndex
Matt has been a~d for h ~s, bes.l recommendlll.iol1 gi vcn this. iuformatio:t:L Hi s.
~rcrorrullCndation should be to accept
J ~ViES'J tE T A LYSJS
e 39 . In acmal [practice., mana._~s. rrequemily us.e tlre:
I. AAR: ht:cm1~c ihe infmrm~a~i nn is ~u ~reu,dil y :1\':a.ilu,hl ~.
II. IRR lk.X"aus.e r.he re.su~ts. are. easy to corrmur1icate. and under~tand.
Ill, p::tybu, k Oet:~IIIS(: nf i m~ ' impl ~ciy.
IV. net pr.ese nl vaLue ibecaus.e it is cons.jdeted by ltillnY lo be lhc bes.t method of anays.~~-
a. 1 ilJJ~d 1~1 only
h. n ilml monly
c:. I. H], a nd TV [mly
d. II . m. und ]V only
e. 1 U. Jll. and IV
INYEST~IiENT ANA LYSIS
a 40. Ncl m;_U icr hnw many rnr ms n f inv.e:..rmenl tlnuly:!iois ynu tin;
~ 11-te u hud re, ulr'i fmm :a. prnjecm m :l}' vury si~n i l'lc:milll y f rom m he expecred re"'iUlt .
h. It.e i 11Et.'TiiJ:Jl rnle nf miurn willl ul WJays pmdut"C Ihe nll.) rdi:alhfc re~ulh.
<.:. ~~ pmje~;.:r "ri ll ne\'eli be. a cepled urde ':o; Hte p~ayb:Jck periud ~..;mer .
d. 11-te i rtil i1.1l cosrs will ~elilf!mll y \'aliy c:nn ' idcr~b[y fmm Ihe c"'il ima~C1 cosl'i.
e. only the ti~t three y~ru-s. of a proj e'Ct ever atlect its. tinal outcome.
INYESTMIEJ T J\ ALYSIS
b 4] . \Vbicb of the followilllg methods. of p~jcct ~al~ts.i are bias.ed to'Willfds short-teml
projocts?
[. i ntcmall rate of return
~~. n ' t"'Ulllilfi ng r:;JII (! n f reatJJrn
~ ~ J. p.aybtJck
[V , d~SCOUIJlted IJXIyb.aC k
a. J ~md J1 only
b. 1II and IV only
<.:. II nrtd llll1m Iy
d. 1and ]V only
e. ]] :md IV only
INVESTMIE. T ANALYSIS
a 42. lf a pr0:ject is assigJJJcd a rcqui red mtc of rctm n equal to zero. then:
il. tlrlc: timing of the project's cash flows bas liiO bcari ng Olil lhc value of me pmjccl.
b. tlrlc: projec-t will a~ways be accepted.
c. thlc project will ili1ways be rejected.
d. whctlllcr the project is accepted or rejected wiU depend on the tim~ng of dll: cash now .
e. tbc project can never add valll!.c for the shareholders.
b iCIS U) Rl "LES
e 43. Yoo arc consider~ng a pmjcct whh the followilllg data:
PAVBACK
e 46. The payba-ck period rule:
a. dri comus cash tlows.
b. ~gnores initial cost.
c. aiwa~--s rnscs aJ lpossib~c cash tlows ~Iii its. calcublion.
d. B()th A and C.
c. None of the above.
PA\'BA: K
c 47. The paybock period mle accepts alll ~nve:stment project s i111 .,-.,bich lhe payback pcr]od foli
the cash tlmvs 1~:
a.. equal to the cutoff poi111t.
b. greater rtha.n the cuto1ilf poilllt.
c. less than dle cutoff point.
d. pos~ti vc.
e. Nnrte n r the uhu,.c.
PAVBACK
d 48. T he p :t)'l:li!i k peried rule i n r~ln \<'emeni mild usdu l M~ll IJcc(':mse:
ii pro\'ide quick c..""ii i [TI~de of lmw mpidly ihe irui ial in\'e 'rtmeni \.Yilllhe realuped.
10, resulf<; nf ~~ shuri fl~l}'b:;Jck_ nl le dcci"'iitt. m W'i ll IJe Ctuick)Y see n,
c. ~l dbcs not take into ac<:ount time ,raJue of money.
tl, All nnhe ~b1\lC ,
e. Nnrte [) r lhc uht.We.
DISCOUNTED PAYBACK
a 49. The discmmted payback period ndc :
~. ccmsit&!:P.) Ihe lime \1ulue uf mnney.
10, tli srnun'l Ihe (;uinflf pninl,
c. ~gnores liliACeitain -cash tlows..
dl. ~s p referred to the NPV mle.
c. None of the above.
PAVBACK
c 50. The payback period 111le:
a. ~lcnnincs a cutoff point so that all projects accepted lby tthc N PV ruk wiU be accepted
lby the paybadk fP'=riod r!Jlle.
lb. determines a 'CUtoff point oo that dcpreciiltion is jltls.t equal to posid ...c 'Cash flow's in the
payba'Ck year.
c. requires an ml'litrary choice of a cutotf point.
d. varks the cutoff point wilh llhe ~nlerc:sl rate.
c. B()ili A and D.
Dijjicu./1)>level: Easy
PROFITABILITY INDEX
e 63. T he profitability index is rhe rati o of:
a. average net income to average investmem.
b. internal rare of rerum to current market interest rare.
c. net presem value of cash flows ro i mernaI rate of return.
d. net present value of cash flows to average accounti ng remrn.
e. present value of cash tlows to initial investment cosr.
I n . PROBILEMS
. ET PRF.SE T \ 1ALUIE
b 66. W h!.li is ihe llet pll'esen'l value nf a prnjec mwiih i i'Je fullnw ing CJISh n~m!$ ::tllld Jl rt:t{Ui red
return of l2 percent?
PROFITABILITY INDEX
d 75. What is the protltabili ty index for an investment with the following c.ash !lows given a
9 percent required return?
PROFITABILITY INDEX
e 76. Based on the profitability ind.e x (PI) rule, should a project with the following cash
tlows be accepted if the discount rate is 8 percent? Why or why not?
Project A Project B
Ye.Dr C~sh,Flm\' Ycar C:JJsh Elqw
0 -$38,500 0 -$412.000
1 $20.0{1() I $10,000
2 $24JJOO 2 $40,000
a. You should accept bO(h projects since both of thtcir Pis me positive.
b. You should accept pr~icct A s~ncc it has the higher Pl
<.:. Yl'tl]l shllUid :attepl bnH1 prc~f!!(;i"i .. ~ nee hn'l h nr H.eir Ph Uli"C ~:dell" ihn I.
d. Y04.1 hould only accept p11ojcc1 B since it has llbe la11gest PJ and the PI exceeds 1.
e. d th:eT project is acceptable.
Victorla. ym1r boss, ins.sts that only projects tbat can retwm at least $L to in today's
doUrus tb11 every $] invested can be at:ccptcd. Six also insists on applfy~ng a ] 0 percent
d ~scount rate to all >Cash tlmvs. Bascd on these critcri a. YOl' shrn1ld~
a. accept tlrle proje.cm because it retm:ns il .hnost $ 1.22 for every $ J i nvcsm
cd.
b. at:ccpl the projc'Cmbcca!!lsc it has a pos ~tj vc Pl
c. accept tlrle proje.cm because lihc N1v is 2.,8.5].
d. reject dR: project because the PI is !.05.
e. reje'C lilhe proj e ~t because the IRR exceeds l0 percent.
rA 'VBAt~K PI!:RJ( )D
c: 79. If \'!till cn"i 2,600 h"Ltc:'-.Lui re u smuU ice cn:um em. Cart tlc:o; nlie c~pccm.c.d ro he
$1 .400 :a ycu.- I"M m hn...-e ye~11 ' . AfreTii he Uilrec year'. m
hc carl is e ~:rx:de~Ut.l be \\1Hni hie ' :<i
U ' rlh:;Jil is he .e:~.pec:led remaining life nr HJC c:noling ~l.tn'l. Wtu~m ~ ~rte ~}TI::tck period
nf ri he ice cream c::u,i ?
~l . .&6 ye:ar;
b. 1.46 year"i
c. 1.86 year"i
d. 2.46 year"
e. 2.86 year"i
PA BACK PERIOD
e 8:0. Ynu me cnl!lsidcri ng u plrujL-c wirlh a11 inirl ial ct:l"i1 nf $41,300. \\'tutl i-; Hte )R~yh:Jd:
period foli thh projccmif the cash jnt1ows arc $5:50, 970. $2.600, and $500 a year o.,cr
dl!: rnexmfour years, rcspect~vcly.
a. 2.04 _years
b. 2.'"'6 year"i
c. 2.89 ye:ar""i
d. 3.04 _years
c. 3.36 _years
PAYBACK PERIOD
c 82. Jack ~s considcr~ng ad.dirng toys to his general store. He esthnatcs tlmt the cost of
inventory wiU be $4.200. The remodeling CXfPCns.cs and sheh.. ~ng costs arc estimated at
$1 jUU. Toy s.alles mrc expected to produc.c net cash int1m\rs of$ ~ ,200, $1 jUU, $] ,600.
and $1 ,7 50 over the next four ycru-s, rcspccthcly. Should J ilc!k add loys to his -slorc if
!he assigns a three-ycru payback: period to this project?
a. yes ; bc~ause the payback [PCrioo is 2.94 yerus
b. yes ; because the payback period is 2.02 yerus
c. yes ; lbccat1se the paylback period ~s 3.80 ycalis.
d. rno~ because the payback period is 2 .02 years
c. no; !because tbc payback period is 3.80 years
Project A Project B
Year c~~h [Jo).'l Cash Flo_w
0 84,500 -$16,900
] $29,000 $25,000
2 $40,000 $35 ,000
3 $27.000 $26,000
a. II , l l percent
b. 13.UJ. percent
c. 14.9 l percent
d. 16.7'5 percent
c. 17.90 percent
Projc-t A P~jcct B
Year Cash flow Cash Flow
0 - 7S..OOO -$60.000
] $30.000 $25 .000
2 $3S.,OOO $30.000
3 $3S.,OOO $25 .000
~l. 13.94 pc~cnf~ A
b. 13.94 pt~~cnt B
c, 15.44pc~cni~ A
d. 15.44 pc~cni~ B
e, 15.8.6 pc:re:cni~ A
PROFITA81LITY DEX
b 93. Based on the proti tabi1ity inde.~ of _ _ for thJs proJect, you -should _ _ the
projc'Cm .
a. .91'; accept
b. 1.05; acrepl
c. 1.1S; a-crept
d. .9'7'; reject
e. 1.05; reject
PAYBACK PER.OD
c 96. Based on the 'JX!Iyback period of _ _ tbr lh LS pmjcct. ) fOU shou[d _ _ the
prnjccr.
i.l. I .87 ~(::a.T-.; ; :a.cccpl
h. 2.87 yem-.; ; :a.ttcpi
<.:. 2.8.7 yeat"i; rcjt:c: i
d. 3.13 yer1r<;; n:jt:c:'l
c. 3.&7 years ; rcjcot
Yol.ll ilfC consideri ng the tbUov.ing 1:\\'0 m1r.ttually exclusive pmjccts. Both p~iccts r;.vHl be
dtprec:i :dod u~illl~ -;i mi gh m
-li 1i1C deprcciulion I n a zcm ht.)llk valUe nver ihe I i fc c)f i llc )ll'njcc m.
Ndthcr project has. any salvage vaJ.nc.
Project A ~jcot B
Year Cash E!ow .Year CU5h Row
0 -$75.000 0 -$70,(0}
[ [9,000 1 $10,04J)
2 8,000 2 $16.000
12,000 3 $72.(0)
Rcqruircrl rate of return 10% 13%
Rcqruircrl payback per iod 2.0 years 2.0 years
Reqru.rcrl acoounli ng return 8% 11 %
PAYBACK PERIOD
b 99. Ra.~ed t!Jpo n tile. p tl.yb:ack JlL"ri od uprl Ihe in l~lrm:a.i ifm I"n\o'ide.tl in lile iJ1m'hle.m, you
:o.llc"MJld :
~l, u<;cepl llxlth prnjred A ;,mtl prujLocl R.
b. rujed hn11l iJ1mjeC'i A rJllltl p mjt.'>Ct R.
<:. utoepl f"t~t.o:cl A and l!'ejed pmjed B.
d. m:cepl projc'Cl B and rej eel project A.
c. require that management extend lllc paybaC'k. period tor project A since it has a h~gher
i niLia~ cost
PROFITABILITY I D:E
e ~ 00. Ra..~d upn n mile pmnfil~hi l ily index (Pn ::~ml ~ lrtt l lll~~nmal itlll pnw1tkd 1n lhe pmblem,
you shoU~Id:
a. ;u:cept both project A :md project B.
b. a-ccepl project A and licjcct project B.
c. m:cept proje'Cl B and reject project A.
d. reject both project A and project B.
c. disregard the Pl method in tthis case.
PA\"HACK
h 103. Corts.idet an iuvest rtl.enl with an ~nitia~ oost o f $20,000 ilf!ld i s expe.cred ~o la.s.Ltbl' 5
yc:urs. '11te cxpeotcd cash t1ow in yean 1 :md 2. arc 5 .ouu, i 111 years 3 and 4 arc $5 ,500
and in year 5 is. $ ~ ,000. l'hc tot ali c-ash inr1m.v is. expected to be $22.WJ olf an a'\:cragc
of $4.400 per year. C41~~nputc the pa)'back period ~ n years.
a. 3.1 8 years
lb. 3.82 years
C. 4.00 yeaJ'S
ct 4.55 yeru-s
e. None or me ~ove.
The JdVcmfae." ofrh.e mJe are ir.~ Jose reJarilm.'ilrip wirh NPV wld rh.e ea.\'t! wirlt rwhii..-h
ir i." tmder.fluod ami l.nmmuni ared. The hWJ di.wtf~wda e.-r Jre rlw; 1l1ere rrw,v be
1W~liiJlle .wlurio-ru wulrlut rule may lemi lo a rauki.Jrg rmflii..i iu e~aluaring rrwitwlly
t:.,.x lrtsiPe inves'fme111s. The srudem .dwuM add a brief expJa.narhm demcm.urorinR their
u.nderstanding t.i f ea.h
PV VS. PI
1OS. Exp1ai I'll the d ifferences. aJJ:ld si t:ni1arities. betv.een ~1et present \'alue (N PV) and l.lle
prontab~ljty index (f 1.,_
The NPV wrJ PI are bct.'li aHy rhe same (;a/(;ularimr. a1uf b.orlr l'ule ... lead fo1f1e .tJme
a ,eprlrejec;i rle,i,~imr. Tire main dif!eren,e berweert tlu: l'wo iii thJi rhe Pi mlJy be useftd
itt Jetermi~ting whi Jr r'roje,r... /(1 a{.- ept if. 'r.mtf.\' are linril'et f: lm'We~rer. rhe Pima,; lead
/ (J i.rl m're,t de<.isimL'i i.n c;mrsidering murually exc:lusi.w: imre.~tmeJrt.~.
Thi." i.-r an (Jpt!H-eJrrled que.~t~-mr wlu"dt atlm ....~ the {..reJiive .m~dem 111 ~JN! uJate tm the
vafl~e (Jfmm-di.\,ow~led c:a:rh flow evafuali.t)Pl mea:rure.~- We tt:iie ir cH a .'iiln'iJrJ;fmarrl to
st~.u thai e~t!ll ra.limwl {i.nJm:ial nrmragen ii.tmretiml!.\' find it e.:rpeJiem 111 u...'e a grrmp
of mea.~ure.fi. For exanrple, firnr.ii may re('l rm the JRR beclJu.~e it is ewier 10 explain ro
l10t:1Td members llr.o.n NPV. Al:io.fm 141-rge projects. AAR pro~ides sha relr.o{de"ts with
some invigh.t.v lJ." io rlu! pmjec;t '.\' impJc:1 rm net ini..nme and t!lJming., per $iwre.
Chapter 7
12 450 19 630 2 750
66 NPV = - $28900 + $ 1 + $ 2 + $ 3 NPV = -$177.62(ne mive)
. ' (1+ .12) (1+.12) (1+.12) ' g
CFo -$28,900
co, $12,450
FOt I
co, $19,630
F0 2 I
col $2,750
F03 I
I = 12%
NPV CPT
-$177.62
CF0 -$12,670
co, $4,375
FO, I
co, $0
FO, I
co) $8,750
F03 I
co, $4,100
FO, I
I = 11.5%
NPVCPT
$218.68
68.
NPV = - $1 0,600 + .t l ,750 I '+' $1,750 , -r $1 ,750 3 + $1 ,750 + $8,500
.
0+. 1375) (I +.1 375 ~ ( ~ +. ~ 375) (1 +. 1375) (1+ . 1375)~
NPV ""' -$ 1.0 11 .40
Ah 1
I= 13.7:5%
NPVCPT
-$ ~ .m 1AQ (negative)
oo~, ~ s,4()() 3 ~ ,3(1(1 $ u,100 . P.
69. Npv
A
-
Q
- .p
-o
4Q
v+
(1 + .1125) 1
+
(l+ .J J25i
+
(l+ .Jl25i
N V
1
A
=.,. 2.32u.46
;:_
CFo -$48.000
col $1SAOO
t-"0, 1
co! $3 1.300
.,
~
co3 $1 (.700
Ah 'I
1::: n .2:5%
NPV CPT
2.326.46
CFo -$126.900
co1 $69.700
A) I I
co! $80.900
m I
I = 10.75%
NPVCPT
1.991 .56
$325.000
70. NPVA ~'1{ = - $2401000 + . ~ PV II..K~ !!!! l7.995.48
. (1 + .08)'
II' - $325.000
N PV"' 1 L~ = - "'240,000 + _ ~ ~ N PV t L ,, 'l- = 2.362.80 (ncgathc:-)
(l +.t lr
CFu -$240.000
co, $0
FO, 2
COz $325 ,000
Ah 1
1=8% 1=1 ] %
NPV CPT NPVCPT
17,995.4S -$2,362.8() (ncgui i\'c)
Cf'o -$19S.OOO
co, $11 0.,800
FO, I
COz $~2. 5UD
Ah 1
COio $45,000
FTh I
1=8% T= II %
NPV CPT NPVCP'li"
[ 1.045.50 $1 ,6S2.28
l= w ] ~ w
NPV CIPT NPVCPT
l8.670.17 $3,88&.05
Si nee these arc ~ndepcndcnt projects and both tloc JRR and IPV ndcs say accept. }'Otl
sho uld accept both pro:jccts f lh crc ru-e suffidenl t\mds to do so.
74. Since CO, is a 11cgativc va~111e. tbcre arc nmJtiplc IRRs. l'hus. lhc lRK mJc does.
ool apply.
V $7,400 $9.800 $&.900 PV
15. p b!\-c< = (t .09) + {1.09)! + (L ;09) ~ ~
1 uol'lon. = 1.m.s9
CFo u
cu, $7.400
FOt l
Ctlz $9.800
~ l
CUJ. $~,900
F0_1 ]
I =9
NPV CPT
2 L909.8':l
CF,, ()
co, $ 10 .00U
FO, l
co~ $7.,300
Ah l
CO! $3.700
fO.J l
I= 8
NPVCPT
18.455.01
$18,455.0 I
Pl - - 99"
.$ LK,6UU - . -
.
77. PVA. inf to....~ =$20,000
.
(LO&)
+
$24,000
1 . ~ PV
(LOSt
? ;nn,,.,.,. = $39.094.65
t ..
P.mjt::c'l A: Prnjeci B;
CFJ) $ o CF11 $ 0
co. $20,{0) co, $10.000
FO, l FO 1
rn~. $24,{0) CO;z $40.000
~ I FO~
I= 8 I= 8
NPV CPT NPVCPT
39,094.65 $43,552.8.1
Because lhe projects. .are independent and the~r P]s. exceed 1.0. boll1 p:rojoclS
shoo ld be accepted.
30,000 $37,000 . -
78. PVinflw.. - + ., ~ NPV1n~:::::::: $57,8:.11.24
o. 1u) 1
u.tur
CFB $ 0
CU, $3-0 ,UOO
FD, l
c~ $37,000
ro~ l
l 10=
rpy CPT
$57.851.24
YoU :d muld n:je~:.; i rhe pmjed ' i nee mihc PI uf 1.05 i.o; 1css mhun Vi ci.uriSIJ. ' rL'1-JJUircmc nI of
I. W. Tmi ' W~\ni h meniiuni ng rih:ai ihe NPV n.f ilrli:o.; pmjec'i 1s
$2$5 1.24 nrtd mhc IRR i"i 13.71 pen.-eni, lbum h Elf \.\1hich wnuld llt)!imully irrulic:a!le
pmjeci uccepiunce, Hnwe\ler, neiiher illt NPV llt)f rhe mR meei mhe re~1ui remeill~
~lf rei urning $ I , I 0 fur c\'try $ I spenl.
$500
81.
S3. The prtlj c..-cr n e\<'er i(lJl ) '' hack un " di M:oU n1cd. ha!i.i. .
OCF $2,600 .$4,900 1500 $ _ _
= (I+ _07)' + (I+ .07)1 + 0 + .07) ~ ncF!: 7,934.20, wlnch IS les HJ:m llle
i nitial cost of $8.500
- d b k
0 1SCoume pay oc =3 +
.$120,000- o-.$28,925.62-$4
$ ~.
1,322.31
5
~
226 01 = 3.97 years
Ginny sho uM rejec t the project since the payba.ck pcrh:xl of 3.97 years exceeds the
required 3 years..
.06 X $240~000 _
A AR
, ~ : AAR =9.93 percem; T1le proJect shoo1d be. a.cc-eptect
.5 X ( 290,000 + 0)
($ 1,000+$1,200 + 1 ,500+ .~ 1,700) -:-4
87. AAR = == 7. 11 poetrccnt
.5x ($3 8,000 + 0)
($9,500 + ~ 2,500 -+ $ ~ 5,500) -;. 3
88. AAR ~ . = 9.60 ifk-"'t'Cem
.5 X (.~260,400+0)
2,~ 00
8.9. AAR = = 6.46 pc~ccnl
.5 X ($65,000 + 0)
The finn sh t ruld reje.l tbe proj oct hase.d on lhe J\A R.
CFo -$7.600
co, $4 ,000
FO, ]
co~ $5,000
'FO, l
co, $] ,000
Hl3 ~
LRRCPT
I 7 .t~99 percent ;;; ] 7 _9%
92. Year Project A Cash Jrlow l~rojcct H Cash flow Difference
0 -$75.000 -$60,lKl.l -$ 15,utl!l
J $30.00U $2:5J.K.IO $ :5,000
2 $35.01JU $30.m.IO $ :5.000
3 $3.S.OOU $2:5J100 $10,000
Cash tlows. for (AB : Cash t1mvs for A: Cash tlows for B:
CF0 -$1 5.000 CF 11 ..$75.~ CF0 -$60,000
co, $ 5.01JU co, 30,000 co, $25 .000
toll, 1 FO, 1 FO 1
C{):! $ s.ooo cn1 ""35,000 C{)2 $30 000
FO~ :l fU! I Jolh ]
co~ $10 .000 co:} ~35.000 C<h $25 000
FOJ ] ru~ I JoUJ ]
IRRCPT ] =d5 I ::::; IS.
13 .~4 percent PV CI)T NPVCFr
$565.05 $86 1.35
'lrhc cros.rovcr rate ~s. l3.94 pe~cc nt. At a. Tate higher thant!r.c cro~soverr m.te, such
as. IS. percent, Pmject B 'i.v.iU have t!hc higher Nt>V and should be acrcptcd
CFn 0
col $46..200
FO, ]
CO:t; $87.300
FOz ]
co, $41.000
~ ]
m $39.000
F04 ]
l= 8.5
NPVCPT
l 76,978.72
PI =$176,Y78.72
169,0()0
; ; .
1.05; You s.hould accept beca.l!.ltse the PI 1s greater than L
.
94. cr:;ll -$ 169,(0)
co1 - 5,200
FOI I
C(h S7,300
FO! l
c~ ooo
J.
FO~
co4 39,000
ro4 I
IRRCPT
J 10.75 pen:~om
y t.lU should [lt.:Ccpt h ct.' !.lUSC llrtc IR R nr I 0.75 pTt.:C"!Ilt c ;(Cc<ls mh~ rcq~1red rei um elf s.so
pL"l'(;C n'l .
95. C n -$169,000
col 6.200
f0 1
co,
f0 1
co1 ~.000
FO . .
c~ 39.000
f-04 l
PVCPI
$7,97&.72
You should acc ept because the PV is posiLi\1e.
96.
I . k .
1.'aybac penod =2 + J6CJ.OOO - $46.200 - 87,300 ::: 2.o07 yc:ars
4 ~ ,000
Bared on payback, rl1e project should he :rejocled because [])e B)a.ybad:: pe.l'lo.dl of
2.87 years exceeds. rlle :requ1 i'e.d period of 2.5 yeai's.
97. rPV =- 75,000 + 19,000 + $48,000 + .~ 12.000
3
. . PV A = -$9,042.07
l\ (J + .l0) 1 0 +- .) 0)-z (1.10)
9&. Beca!JJr~c lhe~carc mutually e.xdusi vc projects. IJbe [RR n~lc should! not be applicdl.
ID -L- k , , $75,000 - J 9,000 - 48,000
99. .oa)'uuC pen 00 tor A = 2 + ~ 2.67 years
12,000
- $70 000 - $1 0~000 - $16~000
Payback penod forB - 2 + :::: 2.61 year '
$7~000 -
either project pays back within 2 years. tnu s.. the.y shouLd both be rejected.
HMJ Becau se these are mutuaJ iy e:-:dusivc proJects.. the PI mle s.hou ld not be. applied_
., 01 . Tbc AAR c-an not be computed because the oct ~nco1.nc. '!.vas. not pm,~ded
I06. $-2001 U 0 ;;; $-181.82: $-181 .82 + l 500 ;;; $ 1.318 . 18~ Cash tlow 0 =$-1 .000: Cash li1ow
~ ;;; $1.318. I 8