IADC WellCAP Well Control Worksheet Bullhead ‘Well Name: Completed By: Date: I PTTC I ‘TRUE PUMP OUTPUT: x ‘SLOW CIRCULATION RATE (SCR): Average Hydrostatic Pressure in Tubing Famaien ‘ta Shain “roe ee Initial Estimated Maximum Pressure on Tubing (Static) ep ere Tea Homan Ponta Kill Fluid Hydrostatic Pressure x 0.052 x a? Snieo —- JSTKSMAN| —_ PressureiPSi) BBLMIN PUMP RATE CONSIDERATIONS: Fi Kill Rate Speeds and Volume ; Decrdoarea pr Par Output Pampas | Ta mane en i oem ore Pao el Daiedtarcape a RECORDED WELL DATA: aes mate an po eeetny VOLUME AND STROKE CONSIDERATIONS: 7 Tubing VolumerStrokes (Surface to End of Tubing, E.0:T) rd, x . 5 7 cimees, TERS Sage: Gases UES - meee” agers Srmgeger — @sHTO REET | sgaximum Pump Pressure Casing Volumos/Strokes (Below End of Tubing, E07. to Pororations) — x + —_ thie come toe Meee meee" cree. Gam Sees ™ Surface to Perforations VolumelStrokes (Kill Point) ShutlnTubiigPresse NI + = + 2 Pst —— Sen SS. ES See [Suteceiorrene «= Mg SEES coiohten meng MER Elma e Tota VolumerStokes to Pump (Including Overdisplacing) a . i A a TreeWethead! ‘Surface “Oversplacerert ae Pump Output ‘Ytal Strokes BOP Stack Rating ree ee “Se eee) Sees [por See a a no FORMATION PRESSURE CONSIDERATIONS: FORMATION Fs Annus Fd Density 0.052 + = aad = ees aE Packer Set = 3 . Estimated Formation Integrity Pressure (Fracture) uw ‘Wax Allowable cae Depth to Peston Estimated Fe ‘Top Perforation Middle Perforation Bottom Perforation PACKER END OF ‘TUBING E07. Final Estimated M: um Pressure on Tubing (Static) Seem Poroatons "eesetaton ‘Monn, Field Units (si, ft, ppg) gry rome fr ‘e3t est Rev 11/15/07 Pagetau TUBING DATA: Tubing UBING & CASING DAT. Tubing Collapse x Tubing Caen pr Fo ‘es Tubing Yield aa Tah TPs assy Pre 1008) CASING DATA: Casing ch Bara Casing Internal Yield x Casing Sas PRESSURE CONSIDERATIONS: n PSI per “Step” andres P) Lesser value of Tubing ie ot (coe page 1), ial Estimated Maximum Pressure on Tubing” osuts e+0= Volume per “Step” +105 x42 = Lesser value of-Tubng Yeo Final Estimated Masimin Pressure on Tubing (Stat) eats (eee poge 1), ‘Strokes per “Step” ] +10 ‘anserer enesren Broke Sue Maroer ‘Brakes par Ser as Estimated Max is ‘Ati Tubing ous aera cei, | pump Rate Field Units (psi, ft, ppg) Rev 08/16/07 Page 2FORMULAS Pressure Gradient igsim) = Mud Weight (ppg) x 0.052 Hydrostatic Pressure (es) = Mud Weight (pa) x 0.052 x Depth it, Tv0) Capacity (let) = Inside Diameter? fn) + 1029.4 ‘Annular Capacitybbist) = (Inside Diameter of Casing? (mn) or Hole Diameter? (in) - Outside Diameter of Pipe? (in)) * 1029.4 Pipe Displacement iseiem) = (Outside Diameter of pipe? (m) - Inside Diameter of pipe? (in)) + 1029.4 Surface LOT Pressure (pa) Maximum Allowable Mud Weight ee eee SN GP8) * “Shoe Depth i TVD) x 0.052 + LOT Mud Weight cpa) MAASP (psi) = [Maximum Allowable Mud Weight (ppa) - Present Mud Weight pai] x 0.052 x Shoe TVD ¢r) 8. Formation Pressure (psi = Hydrostatic Pressure Mud in Hole (pa) + SIDPP ips) 9, Sacks (100 Ib) of Barite Needed to Weight-Up Mud = Bbis of Mud in System x 14.9 x (KMW - OMW) (35.4- KMW) NOTE: This frmula aesumes that tne average dena of Santee 35.4 ppg andthe average numberof sacks (J00%) per baal is 149. 10. Volume Increase from Adding Barite (shi) = Number of Sacks (100 Ib) added + 149 Pressure ips) 11. Equivalent Mud Weight depth (ny = ——_Pressute (ps) " ee mm) “Depth ce, Tv0) x O02 New Pump Rate (SPM) 12 Estes New Pump Pros at Non Pr ats) = Ol Pane Pressey x [ Naw Pume a Seu 15, Estimated New Pump Pr with New Mud Weight esi) = Old Pump Pressure (pi) x stimated New Pump Pressure with New Mud Weight ss) = Old Pump Pressure in) x “Oc Went ory, Field Units Rov 08/16/07, (psi, ft, ppg) Page 3