37 4 - 2559 27

37 4 - 2559 26

2 GMP

11

13
251

27
RRIM 600



2537
637 GMP 2560
50 .

GMP 30

3 40 GMP 3
.

GMP (Re-
gional Rubber Marget, RRM)
(.)


GMP
(Good Manufacturing Practice) 2559
5 GMP .
Premium grade
99

3-7

: 10900
:
:
: . , . , ,
, , .
: :
: :
 2 27 - 2559

GMP

GMP
GMP Good Manufacturing Practice


()
GMP
2555





GMP

2556 GMP


ISO








2537
 3 27 - 2559

637
50



(RSS) 3, RSS 4,
RSS 5
RSS 3 40




GMP
2559 -
(.)


GMP 5
,
, ,


premium
grade 99

3 7 /
1.50 GMP
GMP . 2






150 / 5
800 / GMP


 4 27 - 2559

1 2

3 4

5 6

7 8
 5 27 - 2559

9 10 GMP

The Green Book
GMP








GMP

22
 6 27 - 2559

11 12 /

premium grade



GMP



-

(Mooney Viscosity), (Initial Plas-
ticity, Po), (Plasticity Retention
Index, PRI), (Dirt)
GMP (Volatile Matter)

 7 27 - 2559

( 1)
0.36
0.46%



RRIT 251
0.40 0.47%

STR 20 72 80 GMP
ML(1+4)100o C 1.
GMP

.

GMP
Po 47.0 2.
- 52.0




87.0 100.0 3.



GMP 4.
.
0.02% .
5.

GMP
3


0.27 0.38% 6.

 8 27 - 2559

1 GMP

GMP
, 0.015-0.020
, 0.36-0.46
, 0.27-0.38
, 0.40-0.47
(Po) 47.0-52.0
(PRI) 87.0-100.0
, ML(1+4)1000 C 74.0-82.0

1
7. .


(Regional Rubber
Market, RRM)
2560
.
GMP
20, 7 2 GMP

GMP 34
20


GMP
5

2560
GMP
20 premium
grade 4,000 /
12

.
 9 27 - 2559

GMP , , ,
. 2556.
1
GMP.
3 / .
.
. 2559.
GMP
GMP.
.
. . 09 3674 4351, 08 9598 2603, 08 1275 .
1368 2557.
. . 5906-2556.
, .
2548. 131 31 13
. 2557.
.
. .


1. 1.
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
6. 6.

. 0-2579-1576 301,
0-2940-6653
 11 27 - 2559

30
2 STR 20
RSS 3

(TOCM)
(SICOM) SICOM Approved Factory List
GMP
Selection Committee
3 ( )

Auto matching
(International Tripartite Rubber continuous system
Council: ITRC ) /
(Regional Rubber Market:
RRM) 3
2 2559

(
) Spot Future
Spot



Future

12 27 - 2559

Forward TOCOM
100% 30 SICOM

5%
GMP
100% 30

 13 27 - 2559

251
1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 3
3
1

2

3
7

(Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg.)

.. 55.39
2556 22.18 (, 2554)
16.49 4.38
(, 2557)
( , 2555) 5
1. (S/2 d3)
678,942 2. (S/2 d2)
4 3.
6 (S/2 d1 2d/3) 4.
95 (S/3 d1 2d3) 5.
(, 2555)
2.5
(S/3 d2 ET 2.5%)

(, 95
2553)


5
( , 2555; ,
2550)
251 (RRIT 251)
1
14 27 - 2559

10 462
RRIM 600
57 5
343
RRIM 600 39 (, 2555)

RRIT 251 905,547 (Ak) RRIT 251 8
12.63 Randomized Com-
7,172,304 plete Block (RCB) 3 7 ( 1)
32.34 15
( 315
, 2557)

RRIT 251
30-5-18
(S/2 d2) 1 2
4.38 284.7 1.50
( , 2554)
Sungnoi et al. (2014)
RRIT 251

(S/2 d1 2d/3) (
144 687.1 ) (
)
(S/3 d1) 2553
198 685.0 2558

RRIT 251 1 2553
2554
(S/2 d1 2d/3) 137 2 2554
371.4 2555
3 2555
(S/2 d2) 91 2556
269.6 (Raemlee, 2011) 4 2556
- 2557
RRIT 251 5 2557
2558
 15 27 - 2559

1
1. , S/2 d2
2. , S/2 d1 2d/3
3. , S/2 d1 3d/4
4. , S/3 d1 2d/3
5. , S/3 d1 3d/4
6. , S/3 d1
7. , S/4 d1
1
: Vijayakumar et al. (2009)

RRIT 251 .. 2553
2558 131
2,689

(d1) 168.25
( 3)
(d1 3d/4), (d1
2d/3) 141.25 125.25

(d2) () RRIT 251
94.75 ( 2)

RRIT 251
(
(d1 3d/4) )
137
(d1 2d3) 120
(S/2 d2)
91 (Raemlee, 2011)

16 27 - 2559

2 (/) 1 5
251

4 1
1 2 3 4 5
S/2 d2 50 98 89 96 96 94.75
S/2 d1 2d/3 62 127 121 131 122 125.25
S/2 d1 3d/4 72 144 133 146 142 141.25
S/3 d1 2d/3 62 127 121 131 122 125.25
S/3 d1 3d/4 72 144 133 146 142 141.25
S/3 d1 81 174 161 175 163 168.25
S/4 d1 81 174 161 175 163 168.25
1
2554 - 2558

3 (.) ()
2553 - 2558

5
1 2 3 4 5
53.6 (5) 128.9 (12) 200.1 (15) 204.0 (11) 138.1 (11) 144.3 (11)
191.0 (11) 161.3 (19) 338.5 (11) 494.0 (13) 361.7 (18) 309.3 (14)
295.6 (17) 221.0 (15) 142.1 (14) 694.4 (22) 408.7 (20) 343.4 (18)
188.5 (20) 209.9 (15) 308.2 (18) 197.2 (15) 507.3 (21) 282.2 (18)
112.5 (6) 341.7 (19) 894.9 (18) 414.0 (10) 435.9 (10) 439.8 (13)
375.4 (13) 162.9 (12) 237.0 (11) 442.0 (19) 500.2 (21) 343.1 (15)
119.6 (18) 125.1 (8) 234.6 (11) 299.4 (15) 275.4 (16) 210.8 (14)
28.4 (13) 206.0 (7) 129.4 (11) 55.4 (3) 137.0 (10) 111.2 (9)
29.3 (8) 247.8 (10) 37.4 (1) 24.6 (1) 63.0 (1) 80.4 (4)
56.2 (3) 124.2 (6) 34.4 (2) 0.0 (0) 37.8 (3) 63.2 (4)
715.1 (21) 409.1 (14) 0.0 (0) 10.2 (1) 7.6 (1) 285.5 (7)
5.9 (3) 385.4 (10) 68.4 (5) 191.5 (9) 76.0 (2) 145.4 (6)
2,171 (138) 2,723 (147) 2,624 (117) 3,027 (119) 2,940 (134) 2,689 (131)
:
 17 27 - 2559

1,203.37
RRIT 251
60.77 (S/2 d1 2d/3)
(S/2) 1,020.06
30.52 (S/4 d1)
(S/3) 20.38 695.33
(S/4) 15.71 ( 4)
( 4)


RRIT 251
(d1) (S/4 d1)
43.05 22.15
(d1 (S/3 d1 d2/3),
3d/4) (d1
2d/3) 38.05 (S/3 d1 3d/4),
34.76 (S/3 d1),
(d2) (S/2 d2)
28.58 ( 4) (S/2 d1 2d/3)
21.76, 19.52, 18.00, 16.78 14.48

( 1) (2529) (S/2 d1 3d/4)
RRIM 600 12.90 ( 4)
RRIM 600
55.4
22.50
41.9
38.9 16

28 14.50 (, 2529)

25-30 (, 2556) RRIM 600

RRIT 251



(S/2 d1 3d/4)
18 27 - 2559

12.85 9.99
RRIT 251 (Sungnoi et al., 2014)

(S2 d1 3d4)
13.33
(S/3 d1)
8.89
(S/2 d2)
2.22 ( 4) ( , 2542)
RRIT RRIT 251
251
RRIM 600 (, 2551)
(S/4 d1)
(S/3 d1)

4
251
..

2

5

(.) (.) (.) 4 (.2/) ()

1 3
6 (%)
S/2 d2 58.65 30.58 28.58 873.97 16.78 2.22
S/2 d1 2d/3 59.09 29.43 34.66 1,020.06 14.48 4.44
S/2 d1 3d/4 62.11 31.56 38.13 1,203.37 12.90 13.33
S/3 d1 2d/3 61.57 20.29 34.87 707.39 21.76 6.67
S/3 d1 3d/4 59.95 20.23 37.97 767.96 19.52 4.44
S/3 d1 62.39 20.63 41.83 862.85 18.00 8.89
S/4 d1 61.62 15.71 44.26 695.33 22.15 6.67
1
170 .
= 170 . x Cos 30
o
2

3

4
x
5
= x 2

:
- 2
- (..) = x 125
- 125
19 27 - 2559

1.55, 1.47 1.42

RRIT 251 ( 5)

8.1 - 8.5

2.0 - 2.5 (,
(S/2 d2) 2551)
2.08
RRIT 251 Sungnoi et al.
(S/4 d1), (2014)
(S/2 d1 3d/4) RRIT 251
(S/3 d1 1.70
3d/4)
1.86, 1.82 1.71 ,
,
(S/3 d1),
(S/2 d1 2d/3) 1.46 - 1.57
(S/3 d1
2d/3)

5 1 (.) (./)
1-5 251

2
1 2 3 4 5 (./)
S/2 d2 58.65 59.57 62.23 64.38 66.24 69.03 2.08 a
S/2 d1 2d/3 59.09 59.91 61.83 63.20 64.53 66.43 1.47 d
S/2 d1 3d/4 62.11 62.86 63.92 65.56 67.35 71.23 1.82 bc
S/3 d1 2d/3 61.57 62.26 63.97 65.46 67.27 68.69 1.42 d
S/3 d1 3d/4 59.95 60.63 62.38 63.75 65.41 68.48 1.71 c
S/3 d1 62.39 62.85 64.38 65.57 67.53 69.84 1.55 d
S/4 d1 61.62 62.29 64.07 65.78 67.59 70.92 1.86 b
60.77 61.48 63.25 64.81 66.56 69.23 1.70
1
170 .
2
95%
Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT)
20 27 - 2559

RRIT 251 43.61, 42.33, 33.98
(S/2 d2) 33.57

66.01 (2551)

(S/2 d1 3d/4)
(S/2 d1 2d/3)
56.90 55.59

(S/4 d1) 36.29
( 6)
Raemlee (2011) RRIT x x
251
46.11 (S/2 d1 3d/4)
(S/3 d1)
,
, 503.90 471.53

6 1 (//) 1-5
251

4 2
1 2 3 4 5
S/2 d2 46.92 a 79.25 a 65.73 a 65.61 a 54.75 a 66.01 a
S/2 d1 2d/3 46.17 ab 63.67 b 58.45 bc 58.26 b 43.07 b 55.59 b
S/2 d1 3d/4 46.56 a 66.30 b 63.08 ab 56.73 b 43.05 b 56.90 b
S/3 d1 2d/3 33.33 c 53.89 c 52.89 cd 49.22 c 28.41 c 45.72 c
S/3 d1 3d/4 42.44 ab 51.57 c 50.84 d 42.62 c 31.77 bc 43.83 c
S/3 d1 40.96 ab 49.20 c 52.83 cd 42.64 c 35.96 bc 44.85 c
S/4 d1 38.83 bc 44.54 d 43.38 e 30.52 d 28.25 c 36.29 d
CV (%) 9.1 4.5 6.7 7.8 16.3 7.2
1
95%
Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT)
2
2 - 5
 21 27 - 2559

(S/2 d1 2d/3) 437.20 (S/2 d1 2d/3)
7,357
(S/3 d1 2d/3)
359.59 (S/3 d1) 6,884
( 7) Raemlee ( 8)
(2011) RRIT 40
251

371.36 55.39
(, 2554)
317.28

269.60 (S/2 d1 3d4)
11,035
(S/3 d1)
10,327

(S/4 d1) 7,875

7 1 (//) 1-5
251

4 2
1 2 3 4 5
S/2 d2 152 b 505 c 380 c 409 cd 342 ab 392.60 bc
S/2 d1 2d/3 186 a 525 bc 460 b 496 ab 342 ab 437.20 ab
S/2 d1 3d/4 217 a 620 a 545 a 538 a 397 a 503.90 a
S/3 d1 2d/3 134 b 445 d 416 bc 419 bcd 225 b 359.59 c
S/3 d1 3d/4 198 a 483 cd 440 bc 404 cd 293 ab 388.20 bc
S/3 d1 215 a 556 b 553 a 485 abc 381 a 471.53 a
S/4 d1 204 a 504 c 454 b 347 d 299 ab 381.52 bc
CV (%) 9.1 5.0 8.3 9.5 18.8 8.6
1
95%
Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT)
2
2 - 5
 22 27 - 2559

8 (/)
251
1
(.//) (//) 2
() (//) (//)
S/2 d2 392.60 14,330 95 5,732 8,598
S/2 d1 2d/3 437.20 15,958 125 6,383 9,575
S/2 d1 3d/4 503.90 18,392 141 7,357 11,035
S/3 d1 2d/3 359.59 13,125 125 5,250 7,875
S/3 d1 3d/4 388.20 14,169 141 5,668 8,502
S/3 d1 471.53 17,211 168 6,884 10,327
S/4 d1 381.52 13,925 168 5,570 8,355
1
11 2558 36.50 /. (: , 2557)
2
; 60%, 40%

( 8) (S/3 d1)
(S/4
RRIT 251 d1)



(S/3 d1)
(S/4 d1)
RRIT 251
185,886 185,063
2,689 131
(
; S/2 d2) 29 28 (S/3 d1)
( (S/4 d1)
,
S/3 d1 3d/4) 15 14




(, 2551) RRIT 251
 23 27 - 2559

1 251

2
24 27 - 2559

. 2554.
251.
: 2554.
.
RRIT 251 , , -
, ,

. 2542.
RRIT 251 .
: 2546.
.
. 2551.
:
.
. 173 -
210.
. 2556.
7 . -
. 64 .
. , , ,
, ,
, , ,
. 2550.

. :
. 2551. 2550.
. : 8 -
. . 108-148.
. 32-60. . 2553.
. 2529. 2553. . 128
. . 7(3): 126-136. .
, , . 2554.
. 2552.
4 2553/2554. .
. : 11 .
2552. . 2555.
7 . 323-335. 2555. . 123
, , ,
, . 2557. .
25 27 - 2559

: http://www.rubberthai.com/rubberthai/ clone RRIT 251. International Rubber

[19 2557].
. 2557. November 2014.
. : http:// Vijayakumar, K.R., Eric Gohet, K.U.Thomas, Wei
www.oae.go.th/download/prcai/farmcrop/
rubber.pdf: [16 2557].
Raemlee, S. 2011. Influence of tapping system on
rubber clone ; RRIT 251. International
Rubber Research Conference, Chang Mai,
1516 December 2011.
Sungnoi, S. P. Sopchok and P. Chantuma. 2014.
Effect of tapping system and stimulation on
Research Conference, Philippines, 2428
Xiaodi, Sumarmadji Lakshman Rodrigo, Do
Kim Thanh, Pichit Sopchoke, K. Karunai-
chamy, and Mohd Akbar Md.Said. 2009. Re
vised International Notation for Latex Harvest
Technology. The International Rubber Re-
search and Development Board, Kuala Lum-
pur, Malaysia, 19 p.
 27 27 - 2559

RRIM 600

1 2
1

2

(Fertilization)
(2549) (Integrated nutrient
3 management)
(FAO, 2006)
278 /
( 30-5-18
1 /) 303
/ (Nutrient removal)
1.5 / 336
/

3
(Thainugul, 1986; Pushparajah, 1977)

( , 2549)




- .. 2520 2529
28 27 - 2559

RRIM 600 4

43

2

100

(de la 0 - 30 systematic sam-
Puente and Belda, 1999) pling X - shaped 9

( , 2546; ,
2549; , 2551) (Composite sample)
3 - 5
( )
2 - 3
5
1 - 3
12 - 15
30 - 40
65 - 75

(Boundary line analysis) 1



( , 2549; , 2550;
, 2546; Casanova et al., 1999) 2
(Schnug et al., 1996) - (pH) :
(Shatar and McBratney, 2004) 1 : 2.5 pH meter (Jones, 2001)
(Qua- (Exchangeable
dratic equation) acidity, EA) 1 M KCl
0.05 M NaOH 1 - 10
Phenolphthalein (Jones, 2001)
(Available P)
29 27 - 2559

Bray II (Fe), (Mn), (Cu) (Zn)

Molybdenum blue
(K), (Ca), (HNO3 : HClO4) 2:1
(Mg) (Na) Vanadomolyb-
1 M NH4OAc pH 7.0 date
Flame photometry ,
Flame photometry , , ,
Atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Jones, Atomic absorption spectrophotometry
2001) (Jones, 2001)
(Available S)
0.01 M KH2PO4 (Turbiditry) (Jones, 2001)
(Turbiditry) (Jones, (B)
2001) CaCO3 HCl 1 : 1
(Fe), (Mn), Azomethine-H (Soil
(Zn) (Cu) DTPA and Plant Analysis Council, 1998)
Atomic absorption
spectrophotometry (AAS) (Jones, 2001)
(B)
0.01 M CaCl2 Azo- (Growth index)
methine-H (Jones, 2001)
(Cation ex-
change capacity, CEC) (Y = aX2 + bX + c) x
, , , , y (Out-
(Jones, 2001) liner)
(Base saturation,BS)

(Exchangeable basic cation)
(CEC) (Jones, (0 = 2aX + b)
2001)

(2550)
65 70 4 , , ,
2

(N)
Kjeldahl (Jones, 2001)
(P), (K),
(Ca), (Mg), (S),
 30 27 - 2559

- (pH) 25 75% pH 4.5
(Base saturation, BS) 5.0 ( 1, 1) (2542)
pH pH 4.0 - 5.5
pH
(Cation Exchange
Capacity, CEC)
pH
pHpH
pH



BS
BS

BSBS








BS
BS




2525 75%
75% pH pH
4.54.5 5.0
5.0
(Exchangeable acidity, EA)
(( 1, 1,


1) 1)

(2542)
(2542)



pHpH
4.0
4.0-5.5
-5.5

5050 6.0
6.0
y =y 0.0081x
= 0.0081x + 4.3701
+ 4.3701
4040 R2R=2 0.5503
Mean girth (cm)

= 0.5503
Mean girth (cm)

5.5
5.5
3030
Soil pH
Soil pH

5.0
5.0
2020
2
y=
y -0.004x
= -0.004x+2 0.4052x
+ 0.4052x+ 22.735
+ 22.735 4.5
1010 4.5
R2R=2 0.2802
= 0.2802
00 4.0
4.0
00 2020 4040 6060 8080 100 100 120
120 0 0 2020 4040 6060 8080 100100120
120
Base
Basesaturation
saturation(%)
(%) Base
Basesaturation (%)
saturation (%)
1 (Base saturation) () ) (Mean girth) 150 .
() - (Soil pH) ()
1 1

BSBS









45
45
(()) BSBSpHpH()
() 45 45
40
40 40
40
(cm)
girth (cm)
(cm)
girth (cm)

2)352)
35

(CEC) (CEC) 3535CEC
CEC




Mean girth
Mean girth

30
3030

30
Mean

2525
Mean

25 25
3)203)
20




+
yy==-7.6753x
-7.6753x 22
+69.605x

69.605x
- -126.47
20
126.47 (EA) (EA)
20 yy==

22
-0.0172x
-0.0172x ++0.7475x H+H
0.7475x
+
+
+24.937 AlAl
24.937
3+ 3+

22 22
RR ==0.1002 0.1002 RR ==0.2181
0.2181

1515
(( , 2551) , 2551) 15
15


4.0
4.0 4.5
4.5 5.0
5.0 5.5
5.5 6.0 6.0 00 10 10 20
20 30
30 4040

pH

pH

pH
pH (
(
2)
2)



Exchangeable
Exchangeableacidity




acidity(mmol(+)/kg)
(mmol(+)/kg)


3+ 3+

2

- (pH)
(Al)Al
acidity)
(Exchangeable
()


EAEA

(Mean
girth)

150 . 10 30 mmol(+)/kg

2 2

pH
pH(())
10

()
() 30mmol(+)/kg



EAEA

> >3030mmol(+)/kg
mmol(+)/kg( ( 3, 3,
150
150
1)1)
 31 27 - 2559

H+ Al3+ (Organic matter, OM)

45 -
pH ( 2) -
40

Mean girth (cm)

5050 35
1.0 2.6 %
40 30Al
3+
40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)
25
> 2.6 % ( 4, 1)
y = -7.6753x + 69.605x - 126.47 2
30 3020 y = -0.0172x + 0.7475x + 24.937 2

R
= 0.1002
2

R =
0.2181 2

20 2015
10 30 (+)/. 010 20 30 (2551)
0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 + 17.42 40
2 2
y =y-5.0314x + 18.52x
= -5.0314x + 17.42
+ 18.52x

pH
10 10 Exchangeable
R =Racidity
0.4044
1.0 2.5 % ( 3)
(mmol(+)/kg)
= 0.4044
2 2

0 >030 (+)/
. ( 3, 1) 0.00.0 0.50.5 1.01.0 1.5
1.5 2.02.0(Nitrogen,
2.52.5 3.03.0 N)
pH () () Organic
matter
Organic matter
(%)
(%)

150
4
4





150

150

50



()
() 50
40 40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

30 30
5)
5) (N)(N)


N N


20 20

10
N yN= -0.026x
2
+ 0.9985x
+24.658 10
y=-5.0314x
+3.0
2 3.0 +3.8
18.52x 3.8% %
17.42
2 2
R = 0.5148 R = 0.4044
0N
N


0 > 3.8 > 3.8% % N N


0 10
20
OM OM
30 40

0.0 N
N 0.5 1.0 1.5
2.5
2.0 OMOM
3.0
Exchangeable acidity (mmol(+)/kg) Organic matter (%)
( (
5, 5,

3 2)

2)


(Exchangeable
4



(Organic
matter)

Pushpara
Pushpara
acidity) ((

Pushparajah,
Pushparajah,
(Mean n.d.)n.d.)
girth)


3.3 3.7%

3.3 3.7%
(Mean girth) 150 .
(EA)
150 .


4






150 () 150

()
50 50 4.04.0
N in leaves (%)

40 40
N in leaves (%)

(OM) 5)OM
(N)
3.5


3.5 N
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

1.0 30 30 % OM
2.6 N 3.0
3.0 3.0
> 2.6 % ( 20
4,20 1) OM

N OM



> 3.
y = y-4.5762x
= -4.5762x + 32.733x
+ 32.733x - 25.235
- 25.235 2 2
2.52.5
1.0 10
2.510% ( 3) R =0.4528
=R0.4528 OM N
2 2

0 0 ( 5, 2) 2.0
2.0
2.02.0 2.52.5 3.03.0 3.53.5 4.04.0 0.00.0 0.50.5 1.01.0 1.51.5 2.02.0 2.52.5
N in Pushpara
leaves
N in leaves (%) (%) ( Pushparajah, n.d.) Organic
Organic
matter
3.3(%)
matter (%)
3.7%
5 (N in leaves) 150 . ()
()
5
5



50 (N)(N)





4.0

150150
..
(())

40






3.5

es (%)
(cm)
 10 20 mg/kg
0.250.25

0.300.30
% (%( 6,
6,
1
1 2)2)
10

20mg/kg




Pushparajah
Pushparajah (1977)
(1977)
6,

1
2)


(
3
( 3
4) Pushparajah
4) (1977)
32 ( 3 4) 27 - 2559

50 50 50 50
50
40 40 40 40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
40
30 30 30 30

Mean girth (cm)

30
20 20 20 20
2 2
y = -0.0294x
y = -0.0294x + 0.8662x
+ 0.8662x + 28.177
20 + 28.177 y = -696.11x 2
y = -696.11x 2
+ 368.35x
+ 368.35x - 14.224
- 14.224
210 10
2 10 10
2
y = -0.0294x + 0.8662x + 28.177 R =R = 0.1801
0.1801 2
y = -696.11x + 368.35x - 14.224
2 2
R = 0.4516
R = 0.4516
R2 = 0.1801
10 2
0 0 R =00.4516
0
0 0 5 5 10 10 15 15 20 0 2025 25 30 30 0.100.10 0.150.15 0.200.20 0.250.25 0.30 0.30
5 10 15 20 25 Available
30 P inPsoil
Available in soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 P in P
0.30 in leaves
leaves (%) (%)
Available P in soil (mg/kg) P in leaves (%)
6.1 (Available P in soil) () (P in leaves) ()
150 .
0.350.35
0.35
0.300.30

0.30 0.26 %
P in leaves (%)
P in leaves (%)
P in leaves (%)

0.250.25
0.25
0.200.20
0.20
y = -0.0001x 2
y = -0.0001x
+0.0047x
+ 10
2 +20
0.0047x 0.1912./. 0.25 0.30
+ 0.1912
y = -0.0001x0.15 2
0.15 + 0.1912
+ 0.0047x
0.15 2
2
R% =(
0.19
R 6.1, 6.2, 1 2)
2
= 0.19
R = 0.19

0.10
0.100.10 Pushparajah (
0 5 10 15 1520 2025 2530 30
0 5 10 15 20 0 25 5 30 10 Pushparajah, n.d.)
Available
Available P in Psoil (mg/kg)
in soil (mg/kg)
Available P in soil (mg/kg)
(2551)
6.2 ( , 2551)

6


6
( )

(()

) )
(


11()
- 20,() 11-
30
15 - 25
./

. ( 3





150 .





3.0 %150
3.8
150
..

4)




(
)

(

)()
> 3.8 % (Potassium, K)
-
(K) 7)


7)
(K)
K
(K)



K

K


K

K
K









(
80 5,mg/kg



2) 80 mg/kg

80


mg/kg




80

62
mg/kg


62mg/kg
%
621.2 mg/kg
./.
1.2


1.2 %%





Pushparajah (


40 80Kmg/kg 40 40 3.3
80 mg/kg
1.0 1.4
%
( 7, 1.011.4 2)(%( 7,
Pushparajah, Kn.d.) 803.7%mg/kg 1.0./.
62 % 1.4

1 2)2)
7,
1.2 % 1

(Phosphorus, P) 40 80 ./. 1.0 1.4
% ( 7.1, 7.2, 1 2)

15 ./. (Jones, 2001; , 2551; Thainugul,


( 7)
K Mg(1977)



Pushparajah
Pushparajah (1977)
K
K
RRIM
RRIM
600 600
Pushparajah

(1977)

% %
1.65 K

RRIM
600 4) 4)
(
1.65 (
1.6533% ( 4)
27 - 2559

50 50 50 50
50
40 40 40 40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
40

Mean girth (cm)

30 30 30 30
30 20 20
20 20
2 2
y = y-0.0037x + 0.4616x
= -0.0037x +2019.957
+ 0.4616x + 19.957 y = -37.427x 2
y = -37.427x 2
+ 90.251x - 20.235
+ 90.251x - 20.235
10 10 R2
= 2
0.3578
10 10 2
2
= -0.0037x + 0.4616x + 19.957 R = 0.3578 2 R =R 2
0.4888
= 0.4888
y = -37.427x + 90.251x - 20.235
0 0
R2 = 0.3578
10 0 0
R2 = 0.4888
0 0 20 20 40 40 60 60 80080100100120120 0.5 0.50.7 0.70.9 0.9 1.1 1.11.3 1.31.5 1.5
20 40 60 80Exchangeble
100 120 K inKsoil
Exchangeble (mg/kg)
in soil (mg/kg)
0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5K inKleaves (%) (%)
in leaves
xchangeble K in soil
(mg/kg)
7.1 K in leavesK(%)
(Exchangeable in Soil) () (K in leaves) ()
150 .
1.6 1.6
1.6
1.2 1.2
K in leaves (%)
K in leaves (%)

1.2
K in leaves (%)

0.8 0.8
0.8
0.4 0.4 y = -7E-05x
y = -7E-05x
2
+ 0.011x
2
2
+ 0.011x + 0.6989
+
0.6989 1.0 1.5 %
0.4 R = 0.2385 2
R = 0.2385
y = -7E-05x + 0.011x + 0.6989
0.0 0.0 2
2
( 2)
R = 0.2385
0.0 0 0 20 20 40 40 6060 80 80100 100
120 120 50 600 ./. (
0 20 40 60 80 Exchangeable 120 K 8.1,
Exchangeable
100 inKsoil 8.2soil
in (mg/kg)
(mg/kg) 1) -
Exchangeable K in soil (mg/kg)
7.2 (2549)
7
7

(( )
)

()
()




(
)


150
150 .()


.





1986)


( 3)150


.



(

) )
(
(Antagonism)
( )

8)
8)
(Ca)(Ca)






Ca Pushparajah
Ca
(


(Ca)





(
9.2)







CaPushparajah,

n.d.)






0.5 - 0.7 %

Pushparajah



(








Pushparajah,
n.d.)

1.0 1.5

1.0 1.5
% %(
2)
-
(
2)


Pushparajah



1.0 1.5% ( 2)
RRIM 600

(n.d.)
1.65 %
( 4)

(Calcium, Ca) (Magnesium, Mg)


Ca Pushparajah ( Pushparajah, n.d.) 0.5

Pushparajah
Pushparajah

CaCa




Ca




CaCa

Pushparajah Ca
34 27 - 2559
Ca
50 50 50 50

40 40 40 40

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
50
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

30 30 30 30
40

Mean girth (cm)

20 20 30 20 20
2 2
y = -1E-05x 2
y = -1E-05x 2
+ 0.0137x + 29.119
+ 0.0137x + 29.119 y =y-15.386x + 40.477x
= -15.386x + 6.9345
+ 40.477x + 6.9345
10 10 20 10 10 2 2
2 2
R =R0.0604
= 0.0604 R R
= 0.4668
= 0.4668
y = -1E-05x 2 + 0.0137x y = -15.386x 2 + 40.477x
0 0 + 6.9345
0 0 + 29.119 10 2
R2 = 0.0604 R = 0.4668
0 200200 400400 600600 800800
0 0.50.5 1.01.0 1.51.5 2.02.0
0 CaCa in leaves
in leaves (%) (%)
Exchangeable
Exchangeable Ca Ca in soil
in soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
200 400 600 800 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
8.1 (Exchangeable
xchangeable Ca in soil (mg/kg) Ca in leavesCa in(%)
soil) () (Ca in leaves) ()
150 .
2.5 2.5

2.5 2.0 2.0 Pushparajah, n.d.) (0.20 0.25 %)

Ca in leaves (%)
Ca in leaves (%)

2.0
1.5 1.5

Ca in leaves (%)

1.5
/ ( 9.2)
1.0 1.0
(Antagonism)
1.0 y = -4E-06x
y = -4E-06x + 0.0028x 2 2
+ 0.0028x + 0.8432
+ 0.8432
0.5 0.5
2

2
R =R0.2517
2
= 0.2517

y = -4E-06x + 0.0028x + 0.8432
0.5
R =0.0 0.2517 2
0.0
0.0 0 0 200200

400400 600 600800 800
0 200 400 600Exchangeable
Exchangeable 800 Ca Ca in insoil
soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)

Exchangeable Ca in soil (mg/kg)
-
8.2
/
8

8

( ( )
) () ()


() ()





150
150 ..




150 .

() ((
) 9.1 )
() (Sulphur, S)

(Mg) 9) 9)


(Mg)
(Mg)




Mg



Mg
Mg





( (
1
2)




(
9)

( 9)
9)




25 35 ./.
0.2 0.3 % ( 10,
1 2)
> 0.35 Pushparajah ( Pushpara-
% jah, n.d.) (0.20 0.25 %) ( 4)
0.25 0.35 % < 0.25 %
( 9.1 2) (Mineralization)
Pushparajah (
 K Mg Mg
KK
Mg
Mg

KK

MgK/Mg


(
9)



Mg (antagonism)
Mg

KK

K


K/Mg Mg
K/Mg



Mg
MgK


35 Mg K
27 - 2559
K/Mg Mg
50
50 50
50

40
40 40
40
Mean girth (cm)

(cm)
girth (cm)
50
30
30 30
30

Mean girth
40
20

Mean girth (cm)

20 20
20

Mean
30 -148.48x22++135.8x
yy ==-148.48x 135.8x ++3.6214
3.6214
10
10 10
10 2
RR2 ==0.4314
0.4314
20
00 003.6214
y = -148.48x 2 + 135.8x +
00 100 200
100 200 300 10
300 400 500
400 500 600
600
R2 = 0.4314 0.1
0.1 0.2
0.2 0.3
0.3 0.4
0.4 0.5
0.5
Exchangeable Mg
Exchangeable Mg in
in soil
soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg) Mg in
Mg in leaves
leaves (%)
(%)
0
100 200
300 9.1 400 500 600

0.10.2
(Exchangeable
0.3 Mg in soil)
0.4()
0.5 (Mg in leaves) ()
xchangeable
Mg in soil (mg/kg) Mg in leaves (%)
150 .
0.5
0.5

0.4
0.4 4) 90 130
Mg in leaves (%)

0.5
300 500 ./. ( 11,
0.3
0.3
0.4 ; 2 4)
Mg in leaves (%)

0.2
0.2
0.3
22
yy ==-0.0008x
-0.0008x -- 0.0042x
0.2
0.1
0.1 0.0042x
RR ==0.1268
0.1268
++0.3228
0.3228

22
2
0.0 + 0.3228
0.0
y = -0.0008x - 0.0042x

0.1
44 66 88 10
2
R = 0.126800 22 10
0.0 K/Mg in
K/Mg (mg/kg)
in soil
soil
(mg/kg)
0 2 4 6 8 10
K/Mg in soil (mg/kg)
(Copper, Cu)

9 9.2







/


(
()
)



() ()





(
150
) 150



()




0.5

1.5

./.


150



K/Mg
K/Mg
KH 2 4

PO



Mg
Mg


10 15 ((./.
))
SO42-
K/Mg Mg ()
(
(Iron, Fe) (Manganese, Mn) 12, 1 2)
(2551)
30 90 ./. ( 11, 0.8 1.0 ./.
1) Pushparajah (
(Jones, 2001) Pushparajah, n.d.)
(, 2551) ( 3) 10 ./.

( 11,
) Pushparajah ( Pushparajah, n.d.)

60 80 45 150 ./. (




(mineralization)
(mineralization)
SS

KH KH2PO
2PO4 4
SOSO42-42-




36 27 - 2559

50
50 50
50

40
40 40
40

(cm)
girth (cm)
girth (cm)

30
30 30
30

Mean girth
Mean girth

20
20 20
20

Mean
Mean

2
-0.0427x 22+
yy == -0.0427x +2.4869x
2.4869x- -3.6747
3.6747 y y= =-465.44x
-465.44x+2 +235.54x
235.54x+ +
4.0226
4.0226
10
10 10
10
22
RR ==0.2269 R2R=2 0.548
= 0.548
0.2269
00 00
15
15 20
20 25
25 30
30 35
35 40
40 0.10
0.10 0.15
0.15 0.20
0.20 0.250.25 0.30
0.30 0.35
0.35 0.40
0.40
Available S in soil (mg/kg)
Available S in soil (mg/kg) SSininleaves
leaves(%)
(%)
10 (Available S in soil) () (S in leaves) ()
150 .
10




(())

()
()


5050
50

150
150



50

50 50

4040
40 4040
40
(cm)
(cm)
girth (cm)
girth (cm)

(cm)
(cm)
girth (cm)
girth (cm)

3030
30 11)
11)
(Fe)(Fe)
(Mn) (Mn) 3030

30

FeFe
Mean girth
Mean girth

mean girth
mean girth

20
202030 30 90
90 mg/kg
mg/kg (
( 1) 1)


20 20
20
(Jones, (Jones,2001)2001)
Mean
Mean

mean
mean

2
yy ==y-0.0043x
= -0.0043x
-0.0043x
22
+ 0.4966x
++ 0.4966x
2
0.4966x ++ 19.871 + 19.871
19.871 yy ==y-0.0029x
= -0.0029x
22 2
+ 0.6502x
++ 0.6502x
2 - 1.8174
-- 1.8174
1010 ( ,RR2551)
( 11, 3) Mn

-0.0029x 0.6502x 1.8174
( , 2551)
10 22
R
=
2
=
0.3897
2
= 0.3897 ( 11, 3) Mn RR==0.1937
0.3897 10
10 10 22
R 2
2 = 0.1937
0.1937

00 0
00 0 Pushparajah (1977)
Pushparajah (1977)
00 0 20 2020 40 4040 60 6060 80 8080 100 100 100 60
6060 80 8080 100
100 100120 120 120140140160160180180
Fe Mn
Extractable
Extractable
Extractable Fe
Fe Mn 60 80 45 150 mg/kg (4) (mg/kg)

Fe
Fe
in
in
in
soil
soil 60
soil
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg) 80
(mg/kg) 45 150 mg/kg
Fe
Fe(
in
Fe
in leaves
in
leaves
leaves 4)

(mg/kg)
(mg/kg)


50
50 90 130 300 500 mg/kg 50 ( 11, 2)
50 90 130 300 500 mg/kg 5050 ( 11, 2)

40
40



40

40

40 40
(cm)
(cm)

(cm)
girth (cm)
girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

30Fe Fe30 MnMn
Mn Mn
30 30





girth (cm)

3030 30
Mean girth
Mean girth
Mean girth

2020
20 2020
20
Mean
Mean
Mean

22 2
yy ==y-0.0001x
= -0.0001x
-0.0001x + 0.0439x
++20.0439x
0.0439x ++ 29.44
29.44
+ 29.44 yy ==y-9E-05x
= -9E-05x
-9E-05x ++ 20.0778x
22 2
+ 0.0778x
0.0778x + 16.467
+ 16.467
1010
10 22 2 1010
10
R
R= R = 0.0585
=20.0585
0.0585 R 22 2
R =
2
= 0.4953
R 0.4953
= 0.4953
00 0 00 0
00 0 100
100
100 200 300
200
200 300300 400
400
400 00 0 100
100 200
200
100 200300
300300400
400500
400 500600
600700
700
Extractable
Extractable
Extractable MnMn
Mn in in soil
in soil
soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
(mg/kg) Mn in
in leaves
MnMn leaves (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)
in leaves (mg/kg)
11 (Extractable Fe in soil) () (Fe in leaves) ()
150 . (Extractable Mn in soil) (
10
10) 10


(Mn

in



leaves)
()
(

( )

)
()
150
()










150
150
150







(((
))Zn)

(Zinc,
)
(()
)



150
150














12)12)
12)
(Cu)
(Cu) (Cu)




CuCu
0.50.5 1.5
1.5
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg 10
1010 15
15
15mg/kg
mg/kg

CuCu



 11 11


()
( ) ()
()




150
150






37 27 - 2559
13)13) (Zn)
(Zn)

50
50


5050



ZnZn 40Zn Zn
40


4040
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Zn Zn

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
3030 3030


2020


0.5
0.5 1.5 1.5 mg/kg
mg/kg ( ( 12,
12,

2020
1)
1)

10
10

y=y -10.63x
= -10.63x+

19.616x
+
2 2
19.616x
2
+
+
26.589
2

26.589 (2551) (2551)
1010
y =

=y-0.2521x
-0.2521x +7.0494x

+ 7.0494x -
- 14.292 2

14.292 2
R R= 0.342
= 0.342 R = R 0.473= 0.473
2 2

0
0


(2547)
(2547)
000.4 0.4
0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 mg/kg mg/kg

0.0
0.0 ZnExtractable
Zn

0.5
Extractable
Pushparajah
0.5 Pushparajah
CuCu
1.01.0
in in soil
(as
1.5 (ascited
1.5
(mg/kg)
soil (mg/kg)
cited in Pushparajah,
in2.02.0
Pushparajah, 7 n.d.)
n.d.) 7
8 8
9
CuCu
9 10 101111
in leaves
Zn
(mg/kg)
12 12 13Zn 13
14 14 15
15
in leaves (mg/kg)


20mg/kg
20 mg/kg
12 (Extractable Cu in soil) () (Cu in leaves) ()
150 .
11 11


((
))
()
()

5050 50 50


150
150





4040 40 40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

3030 30 30
13)20
2013) (Zn) (Zn)
20


20

1010
y=y-9.1021x
=-9.1021x

2

2
R
2

=
2
+ 18.308x
+ 18.308x
0.2207
R = 0.2207
+Zn +
Zn
25.364

25.364 10 10
ZnZn y =
=-0.0128x
y-0.0128x +1.1137x
2
2
+1.1137x
2
+10.99
+10.99

R =R0.2525 2
= 0.2525

0 0


0 0 ZnZn


0.0

0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4
0.4
Extractable

0.6
0.6
in0.8
ZnZn
0.8 soil
0.5
1.0 1.0 1.2
0.5
1.2
(mg/kg)
1.5
1.5mg/kg
1.4
mg/kg( ( 12, 12,
1.6
1.4 1.6 0 0 10
1)10
1)20 2030

30 4040

50
50 60

60 70

70
Extractable in soil (mg/kg) Zn Zn in leaves (mg/kg)
in leaves (mg/kg)


13






(Extractable

Zn (2551)
in soil)(2551)

()



(Zn
in leaves) ()






150 .



(2547)
(2547)

0.4 0.4 0.6 0.60.50.5 1.0 1.0 mg/kg mg/kg
11 11
Pushparajah

(
( )
Pushparajah,
) n.d.) ()
()



Zn (as cited in Zn

Zn







150

150
Pushparajah



0.5
(as1.5

cited

./.


inPushparajah,












n.d.)





Zn

( 13,

1) 20
20mg/kgmg/kg
- 0.3 0.7 ./.
(2551) (Jones, 2001)
50 50
50
(2547) ( 50 3) Pushparajah ( Pushparajah, n.
40
d.) 40
Mean girth (cm)

40 0.4 0.6 0.5 1.0 ./.

40 15
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

30 Pushparajah (

30 ./.
30 ( 4)
30
Pushparajah,
20 n.d.)
20 40 80 ./.
20 20

10 y=
y = -9.1021x 20 ./.+ 25.364
+ 18.308x ( 3
-9.1021x + 18.308x + 25.364
2

2
2 10
+1.1137x
y = -0.0128x
+ 10.99
y = -0.0128x + 1.1137x + 10.99
2
2
10 R = 0.2207 10 R = 0.2525 2
4) R = 0.2207 2
(R =, 0.2525 2550) 2
0 0
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
(0 4)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
0.0 0.2B)0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
(Boron,
Extractable Zn in soil (mg/kg) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Zn in leaves (mg/kg)
Extractable Zn in soil (mg/kg) Zn in leaves (mg/kg)
(K/Mg)
0.14 0.61 ./.
11



(
)
()
/

11 () ()



150
150




 K Mg
Mg

38
27
-
2559

50K/Mg 5050
0 40 3.0 4.2 ( 12, 1 2) Jones (2003) 40
40
(cm)
Mean girth (cm)

(cm)
girth (cm)
K/Mg
30 8 : 1 30 30

Mean girth
K/Mg 20 6.6 8.4

Mean
20
20
22
10
y = -0.4328x + 3.3411x

0.2493
R = 0.2493
Mg 10
3.3411x ++ 26.983
26.983
22 10yy
==-2.1772x
-2.1772x ++15.869x
15.869x++3.3344
3.3344 22

22
RR ==0.2149
0.2149
0 (2542) 00 Mg
0 66
24

K/Mg in soil soil
88 10
1042 72 11
22 33
K/Mg
44
K/Mgininleaves
leaves
55 66

(K/Mg in soil) ()
14.1
(K/Mg in leaves) () 150
12


(2549)

()
()
0.5 /


( )
()



0.4
()
()
6.6
8.4
150
Mg in leaves (%)

150

0.3




0.2
0.1 y = -0.0101x + 0.3299 (2542)
16) (K/Ca)
2
R = 0.1227

0.0

(K/Ca)






K/Ca0 24 6 8 K 10



Ca


( 42
13)
K/Mg in soil (mg/kg)
K Ca ( 13)
72

K Ca
14.2


CaCa


K/Ca

0.4 0.41.4 1.4

0.8 1.4 K/Ca K/Ca






(K/Ca)

1 321)




( 13,
1 2)2) Jones Jones (2003,
(2003, 321)

( 14.2) /






K/Ca
K/Ca




44 :: 11






(2549)
(2549)

K/Ca K/Ca





( 15.2)
1.4

1.4
1.8
1.8









KK


CaCa


K Ca









/ /K Ca
CaCa





KK





0.4 1.4 0.8 1.4
/ /
2.0 6.0
3.0 4.2 ( 14.1, 1 ( 15.1, 1 2)
2) Jones (2003) Jones (2003)
/ /
8 : 1 4 : 1 (2549)
 0.00.0
0.00.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.0
K/CaK/Ca in soil
in soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)

39 27 - 2559

5050 50 50

4040 40 40
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
3030 30 30

2020 20 20
2 2
y =y-8.1184x + 14.465x
= -8.1184x + 27.074
+ 14.465x + 27.074 y = -17.472x 2 2
+ 37.368x + 13.012
1010 10 10
y = -17.472x + 37.368x + 13.012
R2 =R0.2503
2
= 0.2503 2 2
R = 0.3571
R = 0.3571
0 0
0 0
0.00.0 0.50.5 1.01.0 1.51.5 2.02.0 2.52.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.8 0.8 1.2 1.2 1.6 1.6 2.0 2.0
K/Ca in soil
K/Ca in soil K/CaK/Ca
in leaves
in leaves
15.1 (K/Ca in soil) () (K/
Ca in leaves) () 150
13
13




()()

2.5 /



2

()

(
)


2.0 y = 0.2004x - 0.7237x + 1.3864



()
()

2
150 150



/
Ca in leaves (%)

R = 0.3829

1.5





1.0 /
0.5 /
17)0.017) (Mg/Ca) (Mg/Ca)





Mg/Ca

Mg/Ca

0.0

0.5

1.0 1.5
2.0
Ca/Mg
Ca/Mg 16.2)
(

Ca/MgCa/Mg
K/Ca in soil (mg/kg)




15.2





Ca/Mg
Ca/Mg



Mg/Ca

Mg/Ca


Mg/Ca
Mg/Ca



50
MgMg
Ca Ca
( ( 14)

14)




Mg
Mg
40
/
Ca
/ CaCa
Mean girth (cm)

Ca

Ca

30
0.2 0.6
Ca


1.4
1.8

Ca Ca
20


Mg/Ca 0.3Mg/Ca
0.5
( 16.1 16.2;

1

y = -8.1184x +


14.465x
2
2

+27.074



0.2 0.6
10 0.2 0.6
y = -17.472x+37.368x
2)0.3
Jones
2
0.3 + 13.012
0.5(2003)
( (
0.5 14,
14, 1

1 2) Jones
2) Jones
R = 0.2503 R = 0.3571 2

(2003)




Ca/Mg
/
2: 12
(2003)



0

Ca/Mg 2 : 1
:1/

0.5 1.0
K/Ca
Mg/Ca

1.5
Mg/Ca
in
2.0
soil

0.5 0.5
2.5


0.0

0.4

K/Ca
0.8
(2549)
1.2
in
leaves (2549)
1.6
2.0
0.5

Ca/Mg Ca/Mg
(2549)
/
3.9
5.0
() / 0.20


(Mg/Ca) () 0.26
()

- 150
/

/

(Mg/Ca) Mg/Ca
Ca/Mg Ca/Mg
 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.00.1 0.10.2 0.20.3 0.30.4 0.40.5 0.50.6 0.6
Mg/CaMg/Ca in soil
in soil (mg/kg)
(mg/kg)

40 27 - 2559

50 50 50 50

40 40 40 40

Mean girth (cm)

Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)
Mean girth (cm)

30 30 30 30

20 20 20 20
2
y = -53.353x
y = -53.353x 2
+ 42.203x
+ 42.203x + 25.822
+ 25.822 2 2
y = -160.15x + 117.93x + 11.612
10 10 2
10 10
y = -160.15x + 117.93x + 11.612
2
R =
R = 0.33750.3375 2
R 2
= 0.456
R = 0.456
0
0 3.9 5.0 Mg/Ca 0 0 0.20 0.26
0.0 0.00.1 0.10.2 0.20.3 0.30.4 0.40.5 0.50.6 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5
Mg/Ca in
Mg/Ca insoil
soil Mg Mg/Ca
Mg/Ca in leaves
in leaves

16.1
(Mg/Ca in soil) () (Mg/Ca in leaves) ()
150
14
14









()()
2.5

-

y = 3.8496x

3.2321x
+ (,
()
1.56952
)



10
- 20, 40
- 80,
50 - 600, 25 - 35, 30 - 90, 0.5 - 1.5, 0.5 - 1.5 0.3
Ca in leaves (%)

2.0 R = 0.3243 2

()()



150./.
-0.7
150




/



1.5

1.0

, / /
2.0 6.0, 0.4 1.4 0.2 0.6
0.5


1
1 0.0









0.0 0.1
RRIM
RRIM6000.2600in 0.3
Mg/Ca
0.4 0.5 0.6
soil (mg/kg) , , , ,
16.2
, 3.0 3.8, 0.25 -
0.30, 1.0 - 1.4, 1.0 - 1.5, > 0.35 0.2 - 0.3 %



50 ,
,
((

) ) 300
90 - 130, - 500, 10 - 15 40 - 80 ./.


40
Mean girth (cm)

pH (1:2.5
pH (1:2.5 in water) in water) - - 4.5< 4.5
< 4.5-4.5 - 5.0

5.0 > 5.0>5.0 /-,-
30
BS (calculate)
BS (calculate)% %
20
- - < 25< 25 / 25 - 25
75 -
75 75 - 75
-/
100 100 >100>100
RRIM 600 3.0 4.2, 0.8 1.4 0.3 0.5
2
y = -53.353x + 42.203x + 25.822 2

R
= 0.3375
2 10 y = -160.15x + 117.93x + 11.612
43 R = 0.456
2

0
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.4
0.5
( 0.1 0.2
0.3
Mg/Ca in soil Mg/Ca in leaves
150 ) /

()

()-
(pH)



4.5 - 5.0 (BS) 25 75 %

(EA)

10 150
30

(+)
/. (OM) 1.0 2.6 %
, , , , ,

RRIM 600
 41 27 - 2559

1
0 - 30


,
- (pH), 1 : 2.5 - < 4.5 4.5 - 5.0 > 5.0 -
(BS), % - < 25 25 - 75 75 - 100 > 100
(EA), 1 M KCl (+)/. - < 10 10 - 30 > 30 -
(OM), Walkley & Black % - < 1.0 1.0 - 2.6 > 2.6 -
(P), Bray II ./. <5 5 - 10 10 - 20 20 - 30 > 30
(K), 1 M NH4OAc pH 7 ./. < 20 20 - 40 40 - 80 80 - 120 > 120
(Ca), 1 M NH4OAc pH 7 ./. - < 50 50 - 600 > 600 -
(S), 0.01 M K2HPO4 ./. < 15 15 - 25 25 - 35 > 35 -
(Fe), DTPA ./. - < 30 30 - 90 > 90 -
(Cu), DTPA ./. - < 0.5 0.5 - 1.5 > 1.5 -
(Zn), DTPA ./. - < 0.5 0.5 - 1.5 > 1.5 -
(B), Hot 0.01 M CaCl2 ./. - < 0.3 0.3 - 0.7 > 0.7 -
/ (K/Mg) - < 0.2 2.0 - 6.0 > 6.0 -
/ (K/Ca) - < 0.4 0.4 - 1.4 > 1.4 -
/ (Mg/Ca) - < 0.2 0.2 - 0.6 >0.6 -
: (CEC), (Mg) (Mn)

43

4








3 5
1
5
 42 27 - 2559

2
2 - 3 3 5

(N) % < 2.6 2.6 - 3.2 3.0 - 3.8 > 3.8 -
(P) % < 0.20 0.20 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.30 > 0.3 -
(K) % < 0.70 0.7 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.4 > 1.4 -
(Ca) % < 0.50 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 - 1.5 > 1.5 -
(Mg) % < 0.25 0.25 - 0.35 > 0.35 - -
(S) % < 0.10 0.1 - 0.2 0.2 - 0.3 0.3 - 0.4 > 0.4
(Fe) ./. < 50 50 - 90 90 - 130 130 - 170 > 170
(Mn) ./. < 200 200 - 300 300 - 500 > 500 -
(Cu) ./. <5 5 - 10 10 - 15 > 15 -
(B) ./. < 10 10 - 40 40 - 80 > 80 -
/ (K/Mg) - < 3.0 3.0 - 4.2 > 4.2 -
/ (K/Ca) - < 0.8 0.8 - 1.4 > 1.4 -
/ (Mg/Ca) - < 0.3 0.3 - 0.5 > 0.5 -
:

1 3 2 3
40
50

0 30 8 - 9


1








 43 27 - 2559

1 2
, 3
()
- (pH), 1 : 2.5 4.5 - 5.0 4.5 - 5.5 - -
(BS), % 25 - 75 - - -
- 110 - 150 100 - 150 -
(CEC), (+)/.
(EA), 1 M KCl (+)/. 10 - 30 - - -
(OM), Walkley&Black % 1.0 - 2.6 1.0 - 2.5 1.5 - 2.5 1.5 - 2.5
(P), Bray II ./. 10 - 20 11 - 30 11 - 15 15 - 25
(K), 1 M NH4OAc pH 7 ./. 40 - 80 > 40 61 - 90 100 - 150
(Ca), 1 M NH4OAc pH 7 ./. 50 - 600 > 60 1,001 - 2,000 1,000 - 2,000
(Mg), 1 M NH4OAc pH 7 ./. - > 36 121 - 365 120 - 240
(S), 0.01 M KH2PO4 ./. 25 - 35 - 11 - 20 -
(Fe), DTPA ./. 30 - 90 30 - 35 2.5 - 4.5 11 - 16
(Mn), DTPA ./. - 2-4 - 9 - 12
(Cu), DTPA ./. 0.5 - 1.5 0.8 - 1.0 - 0.9 - 1.2
(Zn), DTPA ./. 0.5 - 1.5 0.4 - 0.6 0.5 - 1.0 1.1 - 3.0
(B), Hot 0.01 M CaCl2 ./. 0.3 - 0.7 - - -

(2551)
3/
(2547)
3
(2551)

29: 287-296.
, . . 2542.
2549. . -

. 37: . 74.
257-268. . 2548.
, . .
2550. .
, , -
(Aglaiadookkoo Griff.). . - , .
44 27 - 2559

()
1 2 3 4
(N) % 3.0 - 3.8 3.3 - 3.70 2.30 - 2.62 2.06 - 2.18 -
(P) % 0.25 - 0.30 0.20 - 0.25 0.17 - 0.19 0.14 - 0.21 0.15 - 0.20
(K) % 1.0 - 1.4 1.36 - 1.65 1.74 - 2.06 1.55 - 1.71 1.5 - 2.0
(Ca) % 1.0 - 1.5 0.5 - 0.7 1.04 - 1.25 1.58 - 1.94 3.0 - 4.0
(Mg) % > 0.35 0.21 - 0.25 0.24 - 0.28 0.21 - 0.30 0.30 - 0.50
(S) % 0.2 - 0.3 0.20 - 0.25 - - -
(Fe) ./. 80 - 140 60 - 80 61 - 66 - 40 - 80
(Mn) ./. 300 - 500 45 - 150 49 - 58 - 5 - 15
(Cu) ./. 10 - 15 10 7-8 - >4
(Zn) ./. - 20 18 - 20 9.84 - 24.54 > 15
(B) ./. 40 - 80 15 27 - 30 - -
1
(2548), Pushparajah ( Pushparajah, n.d.)
2
(2549), (2550)
3
(2546)
4
(2551)

2549.
. . . 32(3): 180-197.
24: 112-131. . 2546.
. 2551.
. . .
. 2549. 34: 51-58.
RRIM 600. . 2547.
37: 353-364.
. 2551.
2.
. .
7, 26-30 2551, Casanova, D., J. Goudriaan, J. Bouma and G.F.
, . Epema. 1999. Yield gap analysis in relation to
, - soil properties in direct-seeded flooded rice.
. 2550. Geoderma 91: 191-216.
45 27 - 2559
de la Puente, L.S. and R.M. Belda. 1999. Square
root and quadratic equation for the study of
leaf diagnosis in wheat. Journal of Plant Nutri-
tion 22: 1469-1479.
FAO. 2006. Plant Nutrition for Food Security : A
guide for integrated nutrient management.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nation: Rome. p141-192.
Jones, J.B. 2001. Laboratory guide for conducting
soil test and plant analysis. CRC Press: New
York.
Jones, J.B. 2003. Agronomic Handbook: Manage-
ment of Crop, Soil, and their Fertility. CRC
Press: New York.
Pushparajah, E. 1977. Nutrition and fertilizer use in
Hevea and associated covers in Peninsular
Malaysia. A review : Quarterly Journal Rubber
Research Institute of Sri Lanka 54: 270-283.
Pushparajah, E. n.d. Rubber (Hevea brasiliensis
Muell. Arg.). Retrieved January 28, 2009,
from http:/www.fertilifer.org/ifa/content/down
load/8999/133881/version/1/file/rubber.pdf
Schnug, E., J. Heym and F. Achwan.1996. Esta-
blishing critical values for soil and plant
analysis by means of the boundary line sys-
tem (Bolides). Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.
27: 2739-2748.
Shatar, T.M. and A.B. McBratney. 2004. Boundary-
line analysis of field-scale yield response to
soil properties. Journal of Agricultural
Science 142: 553-560.
Soil and Plant Analysis Council.1998. Soil Analysis :
Handbook of Reference Methods. CRC
Press: Boca Raton.
Thainugul, W. 1986. Soil and Leaf analysis as a
basis of fertilizer recommendations for Hevea
brasilliensis in Thailand. D. Sc. Thesis, Uni-
versity of Ghent, Belgium.