You are on page 1of 4

Long-Term Care of the Patient With a Tracheostomy

Joseph S Lewarski RRT

Introduction
Clinical Evidence
Patient and Caregiver Training
Tracheostomy Tube Selection and Airway Management
Tracheostomy Tube and Stoma Care
Suctioning
Humidification
Speech
Tracheostomy Tube Changes and Decannulation
Economic Considerations
Summary

An increasing number of technology-dependent patients are sent home for long-term home-man-
agement of stable chronic illness. With a patient who is going to undergo tracheotomy, patient-
education (for the patient and his/her caregivers) should begin early (before the tracheostomy, if
possible), should be individualized to the patient, and should include basic airway anatomy, medical
justification for the tracheostomy, tube description and operation, signs and symptoms of respira-
tory and upper-airway distress, signs and symptoms of aspiration, suctioning technique, tracheos-
tomy tube-cleaning and maintenance, stoma-site assessment and cleaning, cardiopulmonary resus-
citation, emergency decannulation and reinsertion procedures, tube-change procedure, equipment-
and-supply use and ordering procedures, and financial issues. There should be a scheduled follow-up
plan with the attending physician. A combination of process-validation, through additional re-
search, and expert consensus may be needed to standardize the long-term care of patients who
undergo tracheostomy. Key words: tracheostomy, tracheotomy, home-care, caregiver, training, equip-
ment, airway care, suctioning. [Respir Care 2005;50(4):534 537. 2005 Daedalus Enterprises]

Introduction myriad factors, including increased economic pressures on


acute-care medical facilities, which often result in shorter
A growing trend in recent years has been the long-term hospital lengths of stay and efforts to transition patients to
management of stable but chronically ill and technology- less costly points of care. Additional factors may include
dependent patients in the home. This may be a result of (1) growing social acceptance of persons with disabilities,
which supports the integration of medically fragile and
chronically ill persons into the community, and (2) tech-
Joseph S Lewarski RRT is affiliated with Inogen Incorporated, Goleta, nological advances, which allow lay caregivers the ability
California.
to deliver limited forms of medical care in the home. The
Joseph S Lewarski RRT presented a version of this paper at the 20th net result is a population of individuals living at home with
Annual New Horizons Symposium at the 50th International Respiratory various medical interventions and technology needs, who
Congress, held December 47, 2004, in New Orleans, Louisiana. were previously restricted to institutional settings. Among
Correspondence: Joseph S Lewarski RRT, Inogen Incorporated, 120 Cre- this group are those with tracheostomies, which includes
mona Drive, Suite B, Goleta CA 93117. E-mail: jlewarski@inogen.net. infants, adolescents, and adults.

534 RESPIRATORY CARE APRIL 2005 VOL 50 NO 4


LONG-TERM CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH A TRACHEOSTOMY

The underlying medical conditions contributing to long- Table 1. Components of a Long-Term Tracheostomy Care Program
term-tracheostomy patients in the home are diverse and
Patient and caregiver training
may include but not be limited to patients with upper-
Appropriate tube selection
airway deformity or obstruction requiring improved air-
Airway management/ventilation
way management, patients requiring prolonged invasive Tracheostomy tube and stoma site care
ventilatory support, and patients with other diseases com- Suctioning needs
promising the integrity of the upper airway. Regardless of Humidification needs
the underlying condition, patients requiring long-term tra- Speech
cheostomy care face a series of common obstacles and Tubing change and decannulation
share a set of common needs.

Clinical Evidence
cal needs. Experience suggests that patient and caregiver
In a health care environment moving quickly into an training should begin as early as possible and should be
evidence-based approach to medical procedures and care, adjusted and individualized to the patient. When possible,
there appears to be an absence of such scientific evidence training should be initiated in advance of the actual tra-
when seeking guidance and standards for the long-term cheostomy procedure. Both adult and pediatric patient train-
management of patients with tracheostomies in the home ing should include the patient and at least one caregiver,
or other noninstitutional environment. There are essen- but preferably, two. The details of appropriate patient train-
tially no controlled studies or substantial peer reviewed ing extend well beyond the scope of this overview, but at
research papers to guide care and practice in this field. In a minimum should include basic airway anatomy, medical
a thorough search of the literature, one finds little objec- justification for the tracheostomy, tube description and
tive, controlled scientific data, and, as a result, much of the operation, signs and symptoms of respiratory and upper-
long-term tracheostomy care standard of practice in the airway distress, signs and symptoms of aspiration, suction-
United States is based on extrapolations of bedside trache- ing technique, tracheostomy tube cleaning and mainte-
ostomy care performed in acute-care settings. Other fac- nance, stoma site assessment and cleaning,
tors include local physician practice standards, anecdotal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emergency decannulation
clinical data, third-party insurance payments, and common and reinsertion procedures, tube change procedure (pedi-
sense. One of the most comprehensive documents in this atrics), equipment and supply use and ordering procedures,
field of care is a consensus statement prepared by the and a scheduled follow-up plan with the attending physi-
American Thoracic Society, entitled Care of the Child cian.3
with a Chronic Tracheostomy, which is a very complete
set of recommendations derived from a review of the avail-
able and relevant published data, along with the consensus Tracheostomy Tube Selection
of a panel of experts.1 Another resource, although more and Airway Management
limited in scope, is the American Association for Respi-
ratory Care (AARC) clinical practice guideline governing Tracheostomy tube selection is commonly the respon-
suctioning of the patient in the home.2 The current AARC
sibility of the medical facility and physician performing
clinical practice guideline, although well referenced, is
the initial surgical procedure. There are a number of clin-
specific to suctioning only and does not effectively ad-
ical and technical considerations associated with tube se-
dress other issues associated with the long-term care of
lection. Clinical considerations may include the structural
patients with tracheostomies.
shape and anatomy of the airway, ventilation needs via the
Based on the sources cited above, and on personal ex-
perience, the remainder of this article will discuss the com- tracheostomy tube, need for supplemental oxygen, ambu-
ponents of a long-term tracheostomy care program (Table lation and activity needs, and speech and feeding con-
1). cerns. Technical considerations may include tube brand
and material, tubing size (diameter and length), need for a
Patient and Caregiver Training cuff, need for fenestration, need for an inner cannula (dis-
posable or reusable), need to integrate with other respira-
Early discharge planning and patient/caregiver training tory devices (eg, swivel connectors, speaking valves). There
are required components of the care and treatment of any is no specific research available documenting the optimal
patient with a chronic illness, but are of particular impor- choices in tracheostomy tube selection. As a result, local
tance in managing patients scheduled for discharge with a practice standards and facility device preferences may play
tracheostomy and the associated medical and technologi- a major role in the actual tube selection.

RESPIRATORY CARE APRIL 2005 VOL 50 NO 4 535


LONG-TERM CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH A TRACHEOSTOMY

Tracheostomy Tube and Stoma Care duces a temperature gradient starting with ambient at the
nose, to body-temperature in the lungs. Bypassing the up-
Consistent with other components of the long-term man- per airway may produce unwanted humidity deficit, and as
agement of the patient with a tracheostomy, there is little a result it is common practice to provide supplemental heat
research or published consensus in regard to long-term and humidity to patients with artificial airways. The use of
tracheostomy tube and stoma care. The frequency of tra- supplemental heat-and-humidity systems in conjunction
cheostomy tube-changes varies widely and is often driven with long-term-tracheostomy patients in the home varies
by local practice. Nursing journal papers nearly 20 years greatly and is, again, often based more on local practice
old make reference to pediatric tubing changes in home- than on objective scientific evidence. The use of technol-
care patients on a schedule ranging from daily to month- ogy to deliver humidification varies and includes large-
ly.4 There is essentially no published or recommended volume air compressors for flow-generation, heated pas-
standard for adult tracheostomy tube changes, and again sive humidifiers, heated and nonheated jet nebulizer
most current protocols are the result of local practices. systems, and disposable heat-moisture exchangers. The use
Tracheostomy and stoma-site care also varies greatly, with of heat-and-humidification systems with adult long-term-
no single consensus or science-based standard. Common tracheostomy patients is often based solely on local clin-
home-care tracheostomy and stoma cleaning agents in- ical practice, as there is little science and no consensus on
clude hydrogen peroxide, diluted acetic acid, commercial this subject. Stable adult patients with adequate systemic
medical disinfectants (eg, Control III), and simple soap hydration often tolerate little or no supplemental humidity
and water. Care standards often evolve from the availabil- and/or heat, as is often evidenced from clinical practice. It
ity of reimbursed resources, such as tracheostomy-care appears that many stable adult patients become acclimated
cleaning supplies. Third-party insurance policies often dic- to breathing room air via the tracheostomy, although there
tate practice by limiting the type and quantity of trache- are little to no objective data validating such. In pediatric
ostomy supplies that will be paid for under the home med- long-term-tracheostomy patients, there is a general con-
ical equipment and supply insurance benefit. In many sensus supporting supplemental heat and humidification in
instances, one tracheostomy-care cleaning kit per day is the home, at levels similar to institutional settings. The
the allowed amount, and therefore common practice is small airways and low body-weights of infants and chil-
once-daily tracheostomy and stoma-site cleaning and care. dren may make them more susceptible to minor changes in
systemic fluid balance, increasing the risk of airway/se-
Suctioning cretion-drying and subsequent humidity deficiency. The
goal of supplemental heat and humidity in pediatric long-
Assuring a patent airway and effective secretion man- term-tracheostomy patients is to target the normal physi-
agement are vital components of long-term tracheostomy ology, which includes a temperature at the carina of ap-
care. Suctioning is defined as the mechanical aspiration of proximately 3234C and approximately 100% relative
secretions from the airway and a necessary part of routine humidity. However, the reality and challenges of home
care of the patient with a tracheostomy. The AARC clin- care, including insurance coverage guidelines, environ-
ical practice guideline Suctioning of the Patient in the mental obstacles, technology obstacles, and cost con-
Home is a relatively complete document that provides straints, may prevent some pediatric patients from achiev-
guidance that includes patient preparation, the actual suc- ing such ideal clinical goals. Ensuring airway patency,
tioning event, and post-suction care. Key elements from effective secretion management, and patient comfort are
the clinical practice guideline include self-suctioning train- additional clinical goals and practical end points
ing when possible; guidelines for pre-oxygenation or hy-
perinflation, which may not be needed for stable home
Speech
patients; acceptance and promotion of clean (nonsterile)
technique; suction catheter size selection; suction catheter
insertion depth; frequency of suctioning; reuse of suction Communication is one of the most important consider-
catheters; and consensus opposing the routine use of saline ations associated with the long-term management of pa-
lavage.2 tients with tracheostomies. Loss of effective communica-
tion can isolate adult patients and inhibit normal social and
Humidification communication development in pediatrics. There are a num-
ber of tracheostomy adjuncts to promote speech, including
The human upper airway serves as an anatomical heat- cuffless tracheostomy tubes, fenestrated tracheostomy
and-moisture exchanger, helping to filter, warm, and hu- tubes, and one-way speaking valves. All tracheostomy pa-
midify inspired gas. Under normal conditions, the upper tients should be referred for speech therapy prior to the
airway efficiently adds heat and moisture and thus pro- surgical placement of the tracheostomy or soon thereafter.

536 RESPIRATORY CARE APRIL 2005 VOL 50 NO 4


LONG-TERM CARE OF THE PATIENT WITH A TRACHEOSTOMY

Speech goals should include, at a minimum, effective swal- guidelines often play a major role in formulating the pro-
lowing and vocal communication. cesses and procedures that govern the long-term care of
patients with tracheostomies. Medicare, Medicaid, and pri-
Tracheostomy Tube Changes and Decannulation vate insurance providers often set home-medical-equip-
ment coverage rules and supply-limits based on recog-
As previously stated, there is no consensus or objective nized and published standards of practice and the available
science governing the frequency of tube changes in long- scientific evidence. In the face of deficient scientific evi-
term tracheostomy patients. Decannulation of long-term dence, combinations of local practice standards, along with
tracheostomy patients can be divided into 2 basic catego- practical and cost-effective strategies may influence the
ries: (1) planned decannulation and (2) accidental decan- care and management of patients. Such is the case with
nulation. Planned decannulation is a goal for many trache- long-term tracheostomy care in the home. Physicians, dis-
ostomy patients when the medical need for the tracheostomy charge planners, home health nurses, and home-medical-
no longer exists. A common decannulation process in- equipment providers need to become intimately familiar
volves the sequential downsizing of the tube, often in con- with the local and national insurance coverage rules and to
junction with plugging periods leading to eventual decan- develop patient education and care strategies within these
nulation. This process can take several days or weeks and constraints and guidelines, until such time as there are
is often dependent on the patients stability and tolerance sufficient data to alter insurance coverage policy.
of the downsizing and plugging procedures. Another
planned decannulation is referred to as the one-step method. Summary
This method is more comprehensive and includes endo-
scopic evaluation of the airway and, if clinically indicated, In an era promoting evidence-based medicine, the ob-
the subsequent removal of the tube. The one-step proce- jective science governing the procedures and outcomes
dure is considered more intensive and is often performed associated with long-term management of patients with
in the acute-care setting, followed by 24 48 hours of de- tracheostomies is limited. Unfortunately, research resources
cannulation monitoring. There are no scientific data sup- and the ability to perform effective, controlled studies may
porting one method over the other. Local practice and be limited and somewhat inhibited by the inherent chal-
preferences tend to guide the process. lenges of managing patients in such uncontrolled environ-
Accidental decannulation is an unplanned removal of ments. A combination of process validation through addi-
the tracheostomy tube. Such unplanned decannulations can tional research and expert consensus may be needed to
be uneventful or produce a life-threatening situation.5 There standardize the long-term care of patients with tracheos-
are no published data on the frequency at which this oc- tomies.
curs in the home, but common practice is to provide all
long-term tracheostomy patients back-up tubes, including REFERENCES
tubes that are 12 sizes smaller, to be used in the event the 1. Sherman JM, Davis S, Albamonte-Petrick S, Chatburn RL, Fitton C,
primary tube cannot be quickly re-inserted. Many emer- Green C, et al. Care of the child with a chronic tracheostomy. This
gency decannulations are unreported, as patients and care- official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by
givers are often successful at replacing the primary tube. the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
2000;161(1):297308.
2. American Association for Respiratory Care. AARC Clinical Practice
Economic Considerations Guideline: Suctioning of the patient in the home. Respir Care 1999;
44(1):99104.
One cannot discuss the long-term and home manage- 3. Ronczy NM, Beddome MA. Preparing the family for home trache-
ostomy care. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs 1990;1:367377.
ment of patients without allotting some time to discuss the
4. Lichtenstein MA. Pediatric home tracheostomy care: a parents guide.
economic/financial issues faced by patients, caregivers, Pediatr Nurs 1986;12(1):4148, 69.
and health care providers. As noted throughout this paper, 5. Fiske E. Effective strategies to prepare infants and families for home
local practice standards and third-party insurance payer tracheotomy care. Adv Neonatal Care 2004;4(1):4253.

RESPIRATORY CARE APRIL 2005 VOL 50 NO 4 537

You might also like