Concept Mapping 4832 Nursing Care of Children and Families Fall Semester, 2009 Dr. Kim Serroka, DNP, RN Mrs. Lisa Taafe, MSN, RN Mrs. Jill Rankin, MSN, RN Mrs. Shelia Blank, MSN, RN P. Schuster, Concept Mapping: A Critical Thinking Approach, Davis, 2002¢q oi Step 1. Write the key problems the patient has based on the data Dor problems are also known as the concepts. Start by centering the reason for seeking health care (often a medical diagnosis). Next, list the major problems you have identified based con the assessment data collected on the patient. SLOPPY COPY Key Problem XY ANATON WU [6S OF pe \ \STo ODHY MUSS aren cerare\ ATES =n -Pror SKN. 5 WEN E -W nosy N SENS, 4) {AIAG +0 loan pe 5 ar WSS OF 1912 PRE, 2 Ou — a s < | [Re Protien | On ee ey “O st MX dilerg) ecqaeteten neue PRMENIEH avec eed Xaroen Fas SO Si. ANNO EDACITMD rN" Aine Garg g | 4 st Reeqnes 360 FRR qasis Rear eany Res SER ALN | Bras cess ore KAD TH Ree Ald HD Sener ea Peay dl afECoyeng From UINS, AVE is BARE Aes ewe SE cece TORT TO OR DONG, 5) anaerobes Over ie Sas ys on) tyr? So “Lee ms Wak the Dk sh fs Ht P. Schuster, Concept Mapping: A Osea Thinking Approach, Davis, 2002Step 3. Draw lines between related problems. Number to prioritize problems, LAST- label the problem with a nursing diagnosis. Step 4: Identification of goals, outcomes and interventions, Step 5: Evaluation of Quicomes Problem #_\: Goal OFA GS) Of HOOARON WwegaT Qewe S"peunile FACES CAN OCRE NNR ST CRONIN? SHOWN, TO SOCK ean, Schade on the day of care. Patient Responses ‘Nursing. Interventions ie Be gamed ws Oh aa a | Geai SRA WS Qe to Wierext pe i 4. “wwasde Fakciang on, SRMMV € sO amen WNW Pea 6 1 8 ngegn es OR CY 2 Sn Rac eens 4 eed pwn GT sAneven Geen Ke Creat 6. % 8 é. no Neel A \wrptoing “valusioa of ousomos obotven Ae VOWS UNQIngG CH Gdivey Serodv JON Steady oo Mover expesed Problem # See Sore Ui\_trayre adequate Ads Predicted Behavioral Outcome Obj will “rene UsmL Ot Sie ERE et 7 Apyd~ V Laan gaurd h ‘Nursing Interventions Patignt Responses 1G SAV LARKGPE WHS HOOT ahcene EM eS 2. Teen va 5 3.Onrenve 3. FONONY| Sun acon ° NS ent. FO\ Lio WS aad: SAN aC Sarees, vag 6. 7. 3 8. 8. Evaluation of outcomes objectives: Pr SN Coirated, Teggnnnind NO Jowme “fadings Bur aapay vss T OS Child ysasStep 3. Draw lines between related problems. Number to prioritize problems, LAST- label the problem with a nursing diagnosis. Step 4: Identification of goals, outcomes and interventions. Step 5: Evaluation of Outcomes Problem # Fen Coren CoD sill Vnnpaus WANOS!_\Goe Predicted Behavior Objective (s): The patient will... THK ONE REN BT Senne TH ‘Nacsing. Interventions Patient Responses Ld). ; ; a a Leda tO 8S Roy ge ERR] ANDES Riedy COREE | SN tra® WT ease Ter nen 5 fe 5 6. 6. % z 8, 8. ENS TEBIng ewer + woAN Test RFK Problem #. ~) General Goat beaten Miner sinh Of Vxrouilelee Clout Cave oF yee! Predicted Behavioral Outcome Objective (s): twill Sere WnpoMana, oF ANTI, Q Scr Tees er 40 intath. on the day of care. E —— of ides U GAS 7 Maher undecsroad eer, FN * GeeD 2Re\p Creo, 1D co ANE cegorea To pauetne Cotter s+ MarR NIP 3.AQOANTOX, Hon Vey PS INA AIT ONAASENY MraAical yargan POSHIONS 4. AAROUMTONG) a a AQ NE OAS RENOWN OF PELs wey ERIN EST SNRE SAM Sera nye Compe 7 Ti 8, 8 [Evaluation of outoomes pbjgoiver her NEKSAHMS 1 CAGES AO UTOT SNA nN Neues hes ND NOTH SOUL oe HRS Conant, Ee SOOStep 3. Draw lines between related problems, Number to prioritize problems LAST- label the problem with a nursing dingnosis. Step 4: Identification of goals, outcomes and interventions. Step 5: Evaluation of Outcomes Problem #_S = NONIO 1F General Gout DA wil PeGuiaye SohAA SO tA, s-2 Pinel ic Depts \\ 0, Move ¢ Sean SEN GOS og eee ‘Nursing Inventions Fate Responses or rene G4 HVS Be Wnty Gosddlea aeeo Yeon CORA 4 Grae emp kes Not /T a at =e END So fange >) Rep Evaluation of outcomes objectives WER Hod Abie 0 QNKE For CUD Tandy ‘emp Problem #_W SOOM OITEL WNL HE MOR _CiceDN of reiD“Nem hs Preited Behavioral Otome Objective mn 4OVE 6 IS ownve crear Hen CAE GG, SEK PONTE ‘Nursing Interventions Patient Responses CHUN SMSO CHESITVGT creer Srauied gh levels SF .Gowicty aN wee $00. ZeOOC, BONA OFRAS TS HEAT OE nee BINQRIN SEIGI SOpPAT 3xkes Hos looted, = Mother ARN ww woe 4. PNW OOS SWESA € SHGINVA ena 6 tk 8 BACON BL NO VOGT FO 1EAVE Ha'oys Side OF CeCAWE Wolo. Vetvtlunie sXe Qany CeededStep 3. Draw lines between related problems. Number to prioritize problems LAST. label the problem with a nursing diagnosis, Step 4: Identification of goals, outcomes and interventions. Step 5:_Evaluation of Outcomes Problem #_“7 Creal OO TON GG WERE Oh GRGAY STOIC LH SSS eS ee NOOTHANNET HSC GY REO Nursing Interventions Patient Responses LWA Aa a 2 ae curt S¥ep-unt as ee deer APHHYae ore a 3. Ae RE nD 3a Ted Lio, panexen dx nS NYS GATT WAGATS 4.DE HOS trOrecced WS Uagnt daly anes wor 10.94 He (3 Nya 5) 4 5 GNIS magpeapiat 5) receptive 40 BAQHY Coby 4 MOKES sangigyroniee’ SE eiurod wine OF ald Sereda iz S 7. 8 8, RS A wae GUM, MotREK Ver GHA On Siret FAN ScoWe ar oe Gaaal CONGR oat Cceeer Kelp fern Airy, ORES on the day of care ee Re tPA EN i pe aNINg ; JoreONs, Nursing Interventions Patient Responses TRABE AD FUN Aw SAND WH SRT TO (AVI Pe ZING OF RON ani AOGUNST UME +O Wy Atker bh SQeCdaGOe COMMON] | 3ENTH eines Or as sa VAG 4Sies yom OF ANN 4 ndtrer Ganed OCONS, eet Caer HD & Wneaesr ceqres 5 GOmdnerter 6 tea, “Qreneenygs! % * 8. 8. Evaluation of outcomes objectives Worker chined AL PUD | OBVEL OTE, WITS DwRNY, “#_A_Ustthy ologcad_ fakes, Herdsteiker;