Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Notes
1. R.M. Schoch, "Redating the Great Sphinx of Giza", KMT Vol 3 No. 2, (1992) p53-59 & p66-
70.
2. J. Baines and J. Malek, "Atlas of Ancient Egypt", p36. For consistency all dates used in this
paper have been taken from this reference.
3. J.A. Harrell, "The Sphinx Controversy - Another Look at the Geological Evidence", KMT Vol
5 No. 2 (1994), p70-74.
4. K.L. Gauri, J.J. Sinai & J.K. Bandyopadhyay, "Geologic Weathering and its Implications on
the Age of the Sphinx", Geoarchaeology Vol 10, No 2 (1995), p 119-133.
5. In his paper (note 3), Harrell describes two processes to explain the wetting of sand
accumulations within the Sphinx enclosure. Firstly, Harrell describes storm water run-off
discharging across the plateau and into the accumulated sand. As discussed in more detail
later in the text, the existence of large quarries upslope from the Sphinx would prevent
such discharges. Secondly, Harrell considers that extreme Nile inundation was capable of
introducing water into the lower lying sand within the Sphinx enclosure. He then relies on
capillary action to carry this water up to 2m into the overlying sand. Although in hot, arid
areas capillary fringes are present above groundwater in bedrock, I have to question
whether any significant capillary fringe would develop in a loose, coarse grained soil, such
as accumulated sand. In soil mechanics, capillarity is modelled using the concept of soil
suction and is governed by particle size and the size and content of any interparticle
voids. G.N. Smith states "For sands and gravels above ground water level suction effects
are fairly negligible" (from "Elements of Soil Mechanics", 5th Ed.1982, p434).
6. K.L. Gauri - "Geologic Study of the Sphinx", Newsletter of the American Research Centre
In Egypt, 127 (1984), p24-43.
7. K.L. Gauri - "Deterioration of the Stone of the Great Sphinx", Newsletter of the American
Research Centre In Egypt, 114 (1981), p35-47.
8. A.N. Choudhory et al, "Weathering of Limestone Beds at the Great Sphinx", Environmental
Geology and Water Science, 15, (1990), p217-223.
9. For a discussion of the disposition of quarries within and adjacent to the Giza necropolis
see M. Lehner, "The Development of the Giza Necropolis - The Khufu Project", Mitteilungen
des Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985)
10. F. El-Baz, "Desert builders knew a good thing when they saw it.", Smithsonian, April 1981,
p 16-121.
11. M.M. el-Aref and E. Refai, "Paleokarst processes in the Eocene limestones of the Pyramids
Plateau, Egypt", Journal of African Earth Sciences, Vol 6 No. 3, p367-377.
12. T. Aigner, "A Pliocene Cliff Line Around the Giza Pyramids Plateau, Egypt.",
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 42 (1983) p313-322.
13. M. Lehner, "The development of the Giza Necropolis: The Khufu project", Mitteilungen des
Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985), Figure 3A, item 14.
14. The tomb of Kausert, for example (Porter and Moss, Volume III, Memphis, 2nd Edition
1994, p286 and plan XXIII, grid D-10), is partly rock cut (much of the original masonry
superstructure is now missing), however, the upper rock surface of this tomb preserves
the original slope of the ground. That the original ground levels in this part of the site rise
towards the north is confirmed by Lehner in his paper "Notes and photographs on the
West-Schoch Sphinx Hypothesis" (KMT, Vol 5 No. 3 (1994), p40-48.) "....from the south
wall of the Sphinx ditch and down the slope away from the ditch to the south behind the
Valley Temple [of Khafre] ....". Here Lehner is referring to the topography to the south of
the Sphinx, describing how the ground at this location falls away towards the Main Wadi in
the south.
15. Z. Hawass, "Abstract for the First International Symposium on the Great Sphinx", Egyptian
Antiquities Organisation, Cairo, 1992. "It seems that the Sphinx underwent restoration
during the Old Kingdom because the analysis of samples found on the right rear leg
proved to be of Old Kingdom date."
16. M. Lehner, "Notes and photographs on the West-Schoch Sphinx Hypothesis", KMT, Vol 5
No. 3 (1994), p40-48.
17. In their paper "Geologic Weathering and its Implications on the Age of the Sphinx" (see
note 4), Gauri et al state "the vertical profiles of the strata of the Sphinx on all four sides
as well as those on the south and west walls of the enclosure are rounded and exactly
similar."
18. The alignments shown on Figure 3 represent only a selection of the most significant sub-
vertical degradation features. There are a large number of additional exposed joints
which, for clarity, are not shown - see Figures. 4c and 4d.
19. Courtesy of Robert Partridge and The Ancient Egypt Picture Library.
20. The aspect of a particular exposure (whether it faces north, south etc.) may result in a
variation in the intensity of chemical weathering from one adjacent face to another.
Aspect, however, does not appear to be a factor responsible for the distribution of
degradation across the strata exposed at the Sphinx. For example, although of the same
aspect, the western enclosure wall and the chest of the Sphinx show significant variations
in both the nature and the intensity of the degradation present. Likewise, the north facing
rump of the Sphinx is generally free from sub-vertical degradation features, unlike the
similarly oriented western end of the southern exposure.
21. K. W. Butzer, "Environment and Archaeology: An Ecological Approach to Prehistory",
Chicago, 1971. "....extensive sheet washing - in the wake of sporadic but heavy and
protracted rains - are indicated ca. 4000 - 3000BC. Historical and archaeological
documents suggest that the desert wadi vegetation of northern and eastern Egypt was
more abundant as late as 2350 BC, when the prevailing aridity was established."
22. G.A. Reisner, "Mycerinus, the temples of the Third Pyramid at Giza", Chicago, (1931). The
evidence for flood damage to the Valley Temple is described. In reconstructing the
conditions that contributed to this damage, Reisner suggests that the natural hydrology of
the site was interrupted by Menkaure's causeway. Run-off from the plateau in the north
west, flowed along the northern edge of the causeway and was directed at the western
walls of the Valley Temple.
23. M. Lehner, "The development of the Giza Necropolis: The Khufu project", Mitteilungen des
Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985), Figure 3B, item 24.
24. A.A. Saleh, "Excavations around Mycerinus Pyramid Complex", Mitteilungen des Deutschen
Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 30, (1974), p137
25. The limited area between the eastern limit of quarrying and the Sphinx enclosure may
have generated a small volume of run-off during wetter periods. However, the erosive
potential of this run-off is likely to have been minimal. For the more intense erosion of the
western Sphinx exposures to be attributable to run-off from such a limited catchment,
repeated storm events over a considerable period of time would be required. It is
considered that such conditions are not available under the conventional chronology.
26. M. Lehner, "A Contextual Approach to the Giza Pyramids", Archiv fur Orientforschung, 32
(1985), p136-158.
27. M. Lehner and Z. Hawass, "Archaeology ", September/October 1994, p32-47.
28. Lehner, Allen and Gauri, "The ARCE Sphinx Project - A Preliminary Report", Newsletter of
the American Research Center In Egypt, 112 (1980) , p3-33.
29. The western limit of the Fourth Dynasty quarrying can be seen in the middle foreground of
Plate 4i, just beyond the reconstructed Amenhotep temple (see also Figure 3 and compare
with Plate 3i).
30. V. Maragioglio and C. Rinaldi (1965), L'Architettura delle piramidi Menfite, part V. Survey
drawings of the causeway support the observations made on site, that the masonry along
the eastern end of the causeway is only a single course thick. Further, an underpass has
been cut through Khafre's causeway. As these survey drawings and site inspection show,
this underpass is cut through in-situ rock.
31. An alternative explanation for this common alignment is that it may have been achieved
by 'trimming back' the southern exposure during a second phase of excavation within the
Sphinx enclosure. Such a subsequent phase of excavation, however, is likely to be readily
identifiable by the presence of comparatively 'fresh' cut faces along and adjacent to the
southern exposure. Examination has established that no such 'fresh' exposures are
present and it has, therefore, been concluded that the common alignment results from the
Sphinx and causeway being constructed at approximately the same time.
32. M. Lehner, "The development of the Giza Necropolis: The Khufu project", Mitteilungen des
Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985), p110-143.
33. Ibid. Although Lehner considers the western portion of this northern quarry to have been
worked during the reign of Khafre, he acknowledges that the quarry was worked, in the
east, under Khufu. It is the presence of this quarry that is considered to have brought an
effective end to the erosion of the Sphinx enclosure by rainfall run-off.
34. M. Bridges, "Egypt: Antiquities from Above", p19 and 23.
35. V. Maragioglio and C. Rinaldi (1965), L'Architettura delle piramidi Menfite, part V.
36. Evidence that the ground profile at the site of the western portion of the Mortuary temple
represents the natural topography of the site has been provided, by Lehner. In "The
development of the Giza Necropolis: The Khufu project", Mitteilungen des Deutschen
Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985), Figure 3A, Lehner has
reconstructed the topography of the plateau prior to any Fourth Dynasty development. On
this reconstruction, the elevated site of the cyclopean portion of the mortuary temple is
shown as a naturally occurring low knoll (between points 2 and 5 on the Figure). On
subsequent drawings the edge of this knoll is shown as the western limit of quarrying (to
the immediate left of item 11 - Figure 3B). In a separate paper "Some observations on the
Layout of the Khufu and Khafre Pyramids", Journal of the American Research Center in
Egypt , 20 (1983), p7-25, Lehner discusses the likely means by which the Khufu and
Khafre pyramids were set out and levelled. Slightly different methods were used for each
pyramid, however, in the case of Khafre's pyramid, the levelled area extended only some
16m from the foot of the pyramid casing. It can be determined from this that the levelling
of the pyramid would not influence the topography at the eastern end of the mortuary
temple.
37. Arab Republic of Egypt, Ministry of Housing and Reconstruction, Topographic sheets, F17
and F18, 1:5000.
38. M. Lehner, "The Complete Pyramids", 1997, p128-129 provides a profile of the Sphinx
showing a distribution of the various phases of masonry.
39. Personal correspondence between the author and B.J. Kemp, 24 June 1997.
40. W. Wood, "The Archaic Stone Temples at Helwan", Journal of Egyptian Archaeology, 73,
p59-70.
41. Mathieson et al, "The NMS Saqqara Survey Project 1993-1995", Journal of Egyptian
Archaeology, 83, 1997, p17-54.
42. Personal correspondence between the author and Mr. I. Mathieson, Director of the National
Museums of Scotland Saqqara Project, 15 July 1997.
43. I.E.S. Edwards, "The Pyramids of Egypt", p122.
44. W. B. Emery, "Archaic Egypt", p73, 92 and 94.
45. W.M.F. Petrie, "Gizeh and Rifeh", London (1907).
46. The iconography of the recumbent lion is attested, for this period, by sculpture recovered
from the First and Second Dynasty necropolis at Helwan - see "The Excavations at
Helwan", Z.Y. Saad, Plate 49.
47. B.J. Kemp, Ancient Egypt: Anatomy of a Civilisation, p4.
48. I.E.S. Edwards, "The Pyramids of Egypt", p130.
49. P. Jordan, "Riddles of the Sphinx", 1998, p1.
50. It is the departure from construction at Giza, during the reign of Djedfre and during the
reign of Khafre's little known successor, Baufre, that I consider severely undermines any
proposition that the layout of Giza was established as a 'masterplan' at the time of Khufu.
51. J.A. West, "Serpent in the Sky", Revised edition, p230-232. Stadelmann has recently
attributed the excavation of the Sphinx to the reign of Khufu, principally on the basis of
facial features and the iconography of the nemes head-dress (see 'Royal Tombs from the
Age of the Pyramids', R. Stadelmann in "Egypt - the World of the Pharaohs", R. Schulz and
M. Seidel - Eds). Although this is not consistent with the geological evidence for the age of
the Sphinx, it is interesting, that Stadelmann presents a challenge to the established
association of the Sphinx with Khafre.
52. B. Mortensen, "Four Jars From the Maadi Culture found at Giza", Mitteilungen des
Deutschen Archaologischen Instituts Abteilung Kairo, 41, (1985), p 145 to 147.
53. K. Kromer, "Siedlungsfunde Aus Dem Fruhen Alten Reich in Giseh". Osterreichische
Ausgrabungen 1971 -75, Osterreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften Philosophisch-
Historische Klasse Denkschriften, 136
54. K.W. Butzer, Review of "Siedlungsfunde Aus Dem Fruhen Alten Reich in Giseh", Journal of
Near Eastern Studies, Vol 41, no 2, April 1982, p 93-95.
55. Personal correspondence between the author and Dr. R. Friedman, 26 June 1999.