It is common knowledge that several facilities need the extra

amount of money that is offered by our local authorities. But

which one should receive it? This is a topic that is often
discussed but rarely solved.
On the one hand, the increasing number of childhood illnesses
caused by pollution and the lack of green spaces influences the
will of our community to spend more money in public gardens.
Even though the positive consequences of encouraging our
government to invest in such facilities are not seen in the short
term, the reduction of contaminant gases may be observed
after a few years. In addition, many people agree that everyone
would enjoy having more parks.
On the other hand, it is a fact that our cultural heritage is in
danger due to the lukewarm passion of our community.
Consequently, spending money in our local museums in order
to improve their features and arouse the interest of neightbours
appears as an important issue. Furthermore, modernising these
institutions may attract unexpected tourists to our town.
Taking all arguments into consideration, it seems to me that our
local authorities should spend money on public gardens. At first
sight, I would say that investing in museums is as necessary as
improving parks. Nevertheless, according to a recent survey,
only few people would find museums interesting, whereas the
hole town could enjoy better public spaces.

JUAN PABLO