Professional Documents
Culture Documents
النمذجة الرياضية لقوام التربة في البادية
النمذجة الرياضية لقوام التربة في البادية
. .
. .
.
.
1
4....................... ................................ ................................ ................................
6....................... ................................ ................................ ................................
- 8............................................ ................................ ................................
8.............................. ................................ ................................ ................................ :
8......................................... ................................ ................................ :
9............................................... ................................ ................................ :
9........................... ................................ ................................ ................................ :
10......................... ................................ ................................ ................................ :
10................. ................................ ................................ ................................ :
10............................................... ................................ ................................ :
() 10................ ................................ ................................ :
12............................................... ................................ ................................
14....................................... ................................
: 16......................... ................................
-1 16...................................... ................................ ................................
-2 11...................................... ................................ ................................
-3 11............................ ................................ ................................
11................. ................................ ................................ ................................
23................... ................................ ................................ ................................
24................... ................................ ................................ ................................
26....................................... ................................ ................................
21..................................... ................................ ................................
-6 29.......................... ................................
- 29................................. ................................ :
- 42........................................... ................................ ................................
: 44.................................. ................................ ................................
44..................... ................................ ................................ ................................ :
44.................................... ................................ :
48...................................... ................................ :
22.................................... ................................ :
26.......................... ................................ :
60................................... ................................ :
64.............................................. ................................
66.................. ................................ ................................ ................................ :
66.................................... ................................ :
69...................................... ................................ :
13.................................... ................................ :
16.......................... ................................ :
19................................. ................................ :
82................. ................................ ................................
2
84.................. ................................ ................................ ................................ :
84................................... ................................ :
88...................................... ................................ :
91.................................... ................................ :
94.......................... ................................ :
98.................................. ................................ :
101.............................................. ................................
103.................. ................................ ................................
102..................... ................................ ................................ :
101........................... ................................ ................................ :
108............................. ................................ ................................ :
109............................. ................................ ................................ :
110............................. ................................ ................................ :
111......................................... ................................ ................................ :
112.......................... ................................ ................................ ................................ :
112.............................................. ................................ ................................ :
112........................................... ................................ ................................ :
( )1 44......................... ................................
( )2 ANOVA 42..........................................
( )3 42....................... ................................
( )4 48............................ ................................
( )5 ANOVA 48............................................
( )6 49......................... ................................
( )7 22.......................... ................................
( )8 ANOVA 22..........................................
( )9 23....................... ................................
( )10 26........................ ................................
( )11 ANOVA 26........................................
( )12 21..................... ................................
( )13 60..................................
( )14 ANOVA 60.......................................
( )15 61.................... ................................
( )16 66....................... ................................
( )17 ANOVA 66.........................................
( )18 61..................... ................................
( )19 69.......................... ................................
( )02 ANOVA 69..........................................
( )21 10........................ ................................
( )00 13....................... ................................
( )23 ANOVA 13.........................................
( )24 14..................... ................................
( )05 16...................... ................................
( )02 ANOVA 16.......................................
( )27 11..................... ................................
( )02 19.................................
( )29 ANOVA 19........................................
( )30 80.................... ................................
( )11 84...................... ................................
( )10 ANOVA 82.......................................
( )11 82.................... ................................
( )14 88......................... ................................
( )15 ANOVA 88..........................................
( )12 89...................... ................................
( )17 91....................... ................................
( )12 ANOVA 91........................................
( )13 92.................... ................................
( )42 94.............................................
6
( )41 ANOVA 94.......................................
( )40 92.................... ................................
( )41 98................................
( )44 ANOVA 98......................................
( )45 99................. ................................
( )46 108.............................................. one way ANOVA
( )41 108...................... Test of Homogeneity of Variances
( )48 109............................................ One-way ANOVA
( )49 109...................... Test of Homogeneity of Variances
( )50 110............................................. One-way ANOVA
( )21 110...................... Test of Homogeneity of Variances
1
-
:
.
.
( )
( )
.
:
( )
( ).
:
. -
. -
( ). -
( ). -
. -
( ):
- ( .)......
- ( ).
- .
- ::
: .1
.
8
.0 :
. .
.1 : .
.
.
.4 :
.
(
) ( )
.
:
.
( )
.
%52 .
:
:
-1
-0
-1
-4
-5
-2
9
:
()
( )
.
:
.1
.
.2 .
.3 .
:
:
-1 239 480
29 (
.)2004-2003
-2 2004 .USGS
-3 .SPSS
-4 .ERDAS Imagine 9.2
-2 .ARCVIEW 3.2
-6 .ARC GIS 9.3
() :
:
B3B1 Grain Top Soil Index
1. =S1=GSI
B3+B2+B1 Clay minerals Index
2. )S2= (CMI)= (B5/B7 ( Badia Top Soil clay Index
7371
3. =S3=BADSCI )
53+52+51
4. S4=IOI=B3/B1
B5 .Iron Oxide Index
) (=)5. S5= (FMI B4 Ferrous minerals Index
10
:
B4B3 43
V6 =OSAVI= V1=NDVI=
B4+B3+0.16 4+3
V7=MSAVI2=12 [2( + 1) (2 + 1) 2 8( )] V2=TVI=0.5 +
43
B4B30.1 4+3
V8=TSAVI=
B4+B30.09 V3= = 100
B4B3
V9=EVI=2.5
B4+6B37.5B1+1 43
V10=GVI=0.2848B1-0.2435B2-0.5436B3+0.7243B4+0.0840B5-0.18B7 V4=TNDVI=
4+3
45
V11=VDWI=NDII=NDWI= B4B3
4+5 V5=SAVI= (1 + )
B4+B3+L
7- SI7= B3- B4/ B2- B4 1- SI1= B5- B7/ B5+ B7
8- SI8= SQRT(B2* B3) 2- SI2= B1- B3/ B1+ B3
9- SI9= SQRT(B22* B32* B42) 3- SI3= B1* B3/ B1
10- SI10= SQRT(B22* B32) 4- SI4= SQRT(B1* B3)
11- NDSI= B3- B4/ B3+ B4 5- SI5= B1* B3/ B2
6- Si6= B3* B4/ B2
:
R7= B5/B4 R1= B3/B4
R8= B7/B5 R2= B4/B3
R9=B3/B5 R3= B5/B7
R10=B7/B2 R4= B2/B3
R11= B7/B4 R5= B3/B2
R12= B1/B3 R6 = B4/B5
.B 7B 5B 4B 3B 2 B1:
11
( )Zhai and Thomassov; 2000
()
.
( exhaustive
)covariate ( )stepwise regression ()MLR
multiple linear Regression ( regression principal
)component ( )correlation analysis
. Ben-Dor
( ) MLR((1335
TM
. MLR
.)Selija et al; 2006( HyMap
MLR
A .)Gessler et al; 1995(E
stepwise MLR
.
( Geve et al )0210 regression
)RT(tree ( )LIDAR ()
)Digital Elevation Model(DEM RT
.
) )Mulder et al; 2011
( )
( )MLR
12
(.)Mulder et al; 2011
( Salisbury and )1330 ( )10/14
ASTER
RASTE
.
( Breunig et al )2008
( )SWIR ASTER
(( )TIR 10 )14
() non-photosynthetic
vegetation ASTER
10 14
.
( )Pixels
.
.)Bartholomeus et al;2007(%02
.
).(Lillesand et al.2008
(.)Mulder et al 2011
:
( .)Horizons
A 12
( )B 45
22 C
A B.
13
( )
(.)Lillesand et al;2008
( ) . ( )
()Locher and de BaKKen1990
:
()
Sand 0.05 2.0
Silt 0.002 0.05
Clay < 0.002
:
:
.
:
.
:
61
(.)Quick Bird
:
: .
CDs
.
:
-1 :
14
11 .
-2
30-20
.
.
-soil aggregates
cementing agents-1 : -2
-3 -4 -2 .
-3
.
: -4
()
( )
( )......
.
-2
.
12
:
-1
layer stack
Digital number
spectral reflectance
Header file
subset image pixels
Landsat 7 ETM 60 * 60) pixel size( (30 * 30)
Resampling Bilinear interpolation
.
:
: Bias Gain
Header file DN:
( / /2 /).
:
Reflectivity P 123421
.
:Landsat
:L :ESUN
: drnadir : ( // 2)
.
Header file
:
16
) =(90- sun elevation dr
( )Duffie and Beckman 1980
1998) FAO 56 paper: Crop Evapo-transpiration (Allen et al . :
2
) . :DOY (
365
-2
480 480
( 12 2)
( )1 .
-3
- :
( )
.
11
. ......
- : :
-1 .
-2 )(Phenology
.
-3 ( Biomass
( fraction of Absorbed ) (Leaf Area Index /LAI/
).Photosynthetically Active Radiation fAPAR
)(Chlorophyll
. )(Pixel
()
)(biophysical ( )...
) (canopy
.
- :
20
:
18
) (Chlorophyll
.
( )NDVI
( (NDVI
) (Chlorophyll
: )(NDVI
)NDVI = (NIR R) / (NIR + R
:NIR : : R . .
) (NDVI 1- 1+
0.4 0.4-0.2
0.2-0.1 0.1
0.001 :
( ) .
19
: TNDVI )4
43
=TNDVI
4+3
)Soil (Adjusted Vegetation Index /SAVI/ )5 :
( )SAVI ) (NDVI
( )L NDVI
( ) .
( ) L
( )
.
( )
)7
)(Second Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index /MSAVI2/
1994 : ( (Qi
[
)MSAVI2= * 2(NIR+1) (2* NIR+ 1) 8 (NIR-R ]
) (MSAVI2 1- . 1+
20
:TSAVI )8 :
B4B30.1
=TSAVI
B4+B30.09
)9 )The Enhanced Vegetation Index /EVI/( :
( )EVI
. ) )(canopy (
: )(EVI
:P .
:L
VCI .%100
C1 C2 :
( G ) = 2.2 1.2 = C2 6 = C1: .
21
1
22
)S8)S7S6S5S4S3S2S1
.
( )S4S3S2S1 ) (Abbas and Khan2007
( )S7S6S5 ) (Soheila et al
LANDSAT ETM
.
( )S8 )(Douaoui et al 2006
.
3 .
23
4
24
Hakan Mete -2 ( )FM (
)2008Dogan :
FMI)=(B5/B4
22
6
( )111618 .
7
26
21
9
28
-6
- :
( )Y
...XK X2X1 Multiple Linear
. Regression
( )X `X ( ) SingularNon .
.
:
Yi
...XKX2X1 Ui
n k :
)Yi = B0 + B1Xi1 + B2Xi1 + + BKXik + Ui . (1
( )n :
Y1 = B0 + B0X11 + B2X12 + + BKX1K + U1
Y2 = B0 + B1X21 + B2X22 + BKX2K + U2
. . .. .. ..
. .. .. .. ..
Yn = B0 + B1Xn1 + B2Xn2 + + BKXnK + Un
( )k+1 ()B0
. :
Y1 1 X 11 X 12 ... X 1K B0 U 0
Y 1 X X 22 ... X 2 K B U
= 2 21 1 + 1 ) . ( 2
. . . . ... . . .
Yn 1 X n1 X n2 ... X nk BK U n
Y = XB + U
29
:Y ( ) n+1 .
:X ( ) n k+1
.
:B ( )K + 1 1 .
:U ( )n 1 .
( ) 1
Y ..XKX2X1
Ui:
) Ui ~ N ( 0 2 I n
Ui ( )N ()0
( . ) 2 In
:
OLS
:
-1 :E ) Ui ( = 0
U 1 E (U 1 ) 0
U E (U ) 0
E (Ui) = E 2 = 2
=
. . .
U n E (U n ) 0
-2 :
Cov (U) = E ( U U ) = 2 In
U 1
U
E ( UU ) = E 2 U 1 U 2 ... U n
.
U n
U 12 U 1U 2 ... U 1U n
2
=E U 2U 1 U 2 ... U 2U n
. . . .
U nU 1 U nU 2 ... U n2
) E (U 12 E (U 1U 2 ) .... E (U 1U n )
) E (U 2U 1 ) E (U 22 .... E (U 2U n )
=
. . ..... .
E (U nU 1 ) E (U nU 2 ) .... E (U n )
2
30
) var(U 1 ) Cov(U 1U 2 .... Cov(U 1U n 0
) Cov(U U ) Var (U .... Cov(U 2U n )
= 2 1 2
. . .... .
) Cov(U nU 1 ) Cov(U nU 2 .... Var (U n )
= ) var (Ui) = E( U i2 2
Cov ( U iU j ) E (U iU j ) 0 I#j
12 0 ...... 0
E( UU ) 0 22 ...... 0
0 0 ...... n2
12 = 22 = ....... = n2 :
1 0 ..... 0
= 2 0 1 ...... 0
0 0 ...... 1
= 2 In
Variance
Covariance Matrix U
U ( )
. Ui
-3
:
R (x) = k + 1 < n
( )r )x( ( )k ( )1
( . ) n
( ) xx ()X
( )K+1 ( ) xx
OLS ( )K+1
. OLS
:
31
OLS
( )1
:
Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2
B 0 , B1 , B 2
( ei2 )
:
i 1 ei2
n
Min
ei YI Yi
e 2
i (YI Yi ) 2
B 2 , B1 , B 0 Yi
:
e 2
i (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 2
ei2
2 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 )(1) 0
B 0
-2 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 0
( )2- :
Y nB B X B X 0
i 0 1 i1 2 i2
Y nB B X B X
i 0 1 i1 2 )(3 i2
ei2
2 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 )( X i1 ) 0
B 1
2 X i1 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 0
( )2- :
X Y B X B X B X x 0
i1 i 0 i1 1
2
i1 2 i1 i 2
X Y B X B X B X X
i1 i 0 i1 1
2
i1 2 i1 i2 )(4
ei2
2 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 )( X i 2 ) 0
B 1
2 X i 2 (Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 0
( )2- :
32
X i2 i Y B 0 X i 2 B1 X i1 X i 2 B 2 X i22 0
X i2 Y i B 0 X i 2 B1 X i1 X i 2 B 2 X i22 )5(
) 2( ) 4( )3(
: . B 2 , B1 , B 0
: :
B K
:
Y nB B X B X
i 0 1 i1 2 i2
X Y B X B X B X
i1 i 0 i1 1
2
i1 2 i1 X i2
X Y B X
i2 i 0 i2 B1 X i 2 B 2 X i22
Y n i X i1 X i2
X Y X X X X
2
i1 i i1 i1 i1 i 2
X Y X X X X 2
i2 i i2 i1 i2 i2
:
Y X X i i1 i2
|D| = X Y X X X i1 i
2
i1 i1 i2
X Y X X X i2 i i1 i2
2
i2
n Y X 1 i2
|N1| = X X Y X X i1 i1 i i1 i2
X X Y X i2 i2 i
2
i2
n X Y i1 i
|N2| = X X X Y i1
2
i1 i1 i
X X X X Y i2 i1 i2 i2 i
n Y X i i2
X X Y X X i1 i1 i i1 i2
B
|N |
X X Y X
1 i2 i2 i
2
i2
Y X X
1
|D| i i1 i2
X Y X X X i1 i
2
i1 i1 i2
X Y X X X i2 i i1 i2
2
i2
33
n Y X
i i2
X i1 X Y X X
i1 i i1 i2
B 2
| | N2
X i2 X Y X
i2 i
2
i2
||D Y i X X i1 i2
X Y i1 i X X X 2
i1 i1 i2
X Y i2 i X X i1X i2
2
i2
B 0 :
B 0 Y B1 X 1 B 2 X 2
: :
:
X1 :X2
Yi B 0 B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ei
:
Y B 0 B1 X 1 B 2 X 2 ei ei 0
Yi Y B1 ( X i1 X 1 ) B 2 ( X i 2 X 2 ) ei
y B X B X e
i 1 i1 2 i2 i
:Y Y
Yi B 0 B 1 X i
:
Y i nB 0 B1 X i
:n
Y i
B
n Xi
B1
n 0 n n
Yi B 0 B 1 X i ........ ()6
B 0 Y B1 X i )1(......
(Y B 0 B1 X 1 ..........)8
( )8 ( )6:
Yi Y B 0 B1 X i B 0 B1 X i
:
34
Yi Y 0
:
Yi Y
or
yi = B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ei ) ( I=123n )(9
n :
Y1 = B1 X 11 B 2 X 12 ........ BK X 1K e1
Y2 = B1 X 21 B 2 X 22 ........ BK X 2K e2
. .
yn = B1 X n1 B 2 X n2 ........ BK X nK en
:
y1 X 11 X 12 ... X 1K B1 e1
y X
2 21 X 22 ... X 2 K B 2 e2
. . . . . . .
y n X n1 X n2 ... X nk B K en
:
Y=x B e
:
:Y ( ) n 1 .
:X ( ) n k 1 .
B 0 :
B 0 Y B1 X 1 B 2 X 2
or
) B 0 Y ( B1 X 1 B 2 X 2
: B ( ) K 1 1 .
:E ( ) n 1 .
:
( ) 1 . 4 :
ei yi B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2
32
.
B1 , B1 :
) e ( y B x B x
2
i i 1 i1 2 i2
2
e 2
2 ( y B x B X )( xi1 ) 0
i
B
i 1 i1 2 i2
1
2 X i1 ( y i B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 0
( )2-:
X y B X
i1 i 1
2
i1 B 2 X i1 X i 2 0
x y B X
i1 i 1
2
i1 B 2 X i1 X i 2
( ... ) 10
ei2
2 ( yi B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 )( X i 2 ) 0
B 2
2 xi 2 ( yi B1 X i1 B 2 X i 2 ) 0
( )2-:
X i2 yi B1 X i1 X i 2 B 2 X i22 0
X i2 yi B1 X i1 X i 2 B 2 X i22 )...(11
:
X i1 yi X i21 X X B1
i1 i2
X i 2 yi X i1 X i 2 X 2
i2 B2
:
xy ( xx) B 1
:
B ( X X ) 1 X Y
| | X X X Y
)adj ( xx
( X X ) 1
| | xx
: B 0 .
36
B 0 Y B1 X 1 B 2 X 2
:
( Yi ) 2
y 2
i Y
i
2
n
( Yi ) 2
y 2
1 Yi 2
( Yi ) 2
y 2
2 Yi 2
) ( X 1 )( Y
x y X Y
1 1
n
) ( X 1 )( Y
x2 y X Y 1
n
) ( X 1 )( X 2
x x X
1 2 1 X2
n
:
F t
R 2
R 2 F R 2 ANOVA
R 2 . ei2
(:)t
t ...xkx2x1 y
:
B1 = B2 = B3 ...= BK = 0 H0
B1 = B2 # B3 # ...BK = 0 H1
( ) t
:
B1
31
B1
tB1
S B
1
S B S 2 B1
1
S B2 var( B1 ) S 2 ea11
1
var( B ) S 2 e( xx) 1
S 2e
ee
Y Y B X Y
y 2
) ( B1 x1 y B 2 x2 y
n k 1 n k 1 n k 1 : B 2
B 2
t B
2
S B
2
S B S 2 B 2
2
S 2
var( B 2 ) S 2 ea 22
B 2
ee
S 2e
n k 1
:
y y B xy ee
38
:
: . y y
: B xy .
: ee .
R2
Total variation
:
B x y B x y
R2
y y y2
ee
R2 1
y y nY 2
B1 x1 y B 2 x 2 y
R2
y 2
R2
) ( B xy
( ) n-k-1 R-2
:
n 1
) R 2 (1 R 2
n k 1
StatisticsF F
...XK X2X1 Y
:
:H0
XKX2X1 Y:
H 0 : B1 B 2 B K 0
:H1
:
H1 : B1 # B 2 #...B k #0
:
39
B xylk
F
ee ln k 1
or
R 2lk
F
1 R 2 ln k 1
F ( )k ( ) n-k-1
. H0
H1
XK . Y
H0
.
:ANOVA
X2 X1 Y
X2X1 . :
F
B x y K B x ylk B x ylk
F
x 1x 2 ee ln k 1
ee n k 1 ee ln k 1
()
y y nk
:
( )
Y
. ) .E(Y0
)E(Y0
( )K ).E(Y0
X 0 1X 01 X 02 ... X 0 K
40
B 0
B1
Y0 1X 01 X 02 ... X 0 K .
.
B
K
Y0 B B X ... B X
0 1 01 K 0K
:
Y0 X 0 B
) E(Y0
) (Y0:
) E (Y0 ) E ( X 0 B ) : (Y0
) E (Y ) X E ( B
0 0
E ( B ) B
E (Y0 ) X 0 B
:
}(Y0 ) E{(Y0 E (Y0 )(Y0 E (Y0 )
Var
} E{(Y0 X 0 B)(Y0 X 0 B)
Y X B
0 0
} var(Y0 ) E{( X 0 B X 0 B)
X {E ( B B)( B B)} X
0 0
X 0 ( X X ) X 0
2 1
) S 2 (Y0: ) var(Y0
S 2 (Y0 ) S 2 X 0 ( X X ) 1 X 0
) E (Y0:
) E (Y0 ) Y0 tl 2 .S (Y0
) E (Y0 ) X 0 B TL 2 .S (Y0
41
-
-1
ArcGIS version 9.3 .
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
-2
.
-6
.
-1 Pearson Correlation analysis
.
-8 Multiple Linear Regression
SPSS
regression model Multiple
Royston and Sauerbrei
) )2008 stepwise regression SPSS
version 20.0
.
-9 Multiple Linear Regression
stepwise regression SPSS version 20.0
.
-10 Multiple Linear Regression
stepwise regression SPSS version 20.0
.
-11 Multiple Linear Regression
42
stepwise regression SPSS version 20.0
.
-12 Multiple Linear Regression
stepwise regression SPSS version 20.0
.
-13 ( )12-8
Coefficient
of determination R2 Adjusted
standard errors of the
models variables
%1 .%2
-14 ( )13-8
.
-12 .
-16 quantitative criteria measured
and predicted values R2 R2
.
:YiXi :
:n .
43
:
:
( )Y Response variable
( )V11V10V9V8V7V6V5V4V3V2V1
.2.21 2.25 SPSS Stepwise
.
()V11V4V6V9V7
. ( ) 1 (
.(SPSS
( )1
Change Statistics
44
( )2 ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
( ) 2 .F
F=27.328 0.000 0.05
0.01 0.05 0.01
.
()3
.Stepwise
( )3
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
42
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05
0.01 V7 ( ).
:
= 66.39072303 721.9878846 v4 + 2407.681418 v6 + 182.8354566 v7
11 11
TNDVI NDVI
OSAVI MSAVI2 EVI
NDWI
GVI .
46
12
41
:
( )Y Response variable
( )S5S4S3S2S1
2.21 2.25 SPSS Stepwise
.
( ) 1 (
.(SPSS
( )4
Change Statistics
Predictors: (Constant) s3 s1 s4 s2 s5
Adjusted R Square R 2=0.221 ( )4
%0.221
(.)S5S4S3S2S1
R Correlation coefficient R=0.476
Sig. F Change .0.000
( )5 Stepwise
()S5S4S3S2S1 . ANOVA
( )5 ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F Sig.
Predictors: (Constant) s3 s1 s4 s2 s5
( ) 5 .F
F=37.379 0.000
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01 .
( )6 .Stepwise
48
( )6
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
49
( )14
.
14 13
) 7 (31
=BADSCI
) 5(3 +2+1
20
115
21
:
( )Y Response variable
( )si11si10si9si8si7si6si5si4si3si2si1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 7 (
.(SPSS
( )7
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square R Square F Sig. F
Square Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
22
( )9
Normality test
of residuals ( )12
( )17
.
23
17 16
24
11 8
22
:
( )Y Response variable
( )r12 r11r10r9r8r7r6r5r4r3r2r1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 1 (
.(SPSS
( )10
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square R Square Sig. F
Square the Estimate F Change df1 df2
Change Change
26
( )12
21
21
19
28
21
29
:
( )Y Response variable
( )b7b4.b5b3b2b1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 13 (
.(SPSS
( )13
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square F Sig. F
Square Square the Estimate
Change Change df1 df2 Change
60
( )15
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
( )15 ( )52.693
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01
b7 ( )341.533 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01
b7 ( )
( )15 b1 ( )-380.942
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05 0.01
b1 ( )
b5 ( )-101.523 0.05
0.025 0.05 b5
( ).
:
= 52.69269333 380.9417705 B1 101.5227218 B5
+ 341.5333438 B7
61
Normality test
of residuals ( )00
( )01
.
23 22
62
24
63
(
)
:
= 62.2011 - 31.1222*V11-144.398*V4 + 481.2363*V6 - 201.014*V9 +
36.26109*V7 + 249.0662*S3 - 132.826*S1-22.4939*S4 + 29.34182*S2 +
4.162123*S2 - 16.3249*Si2 -61.2286*Si2 - 22.622*Si1 + 22.34009*Si6 -
4.16309*Si1- 34.2103*R12 + 11.2332*R2 +19.94309*R11 -
9.16101*R2+68.30661*B1 - 16.1884*B1- 20.3042*B2
Sin Rn . Sn Vn :
1 4 3 B4 B3
= (66.39072303 721.9878846 + 2407.681418 + 182.8354566
5 4 + 3 B4 + B3 + 0.16
64
25
62
:
( )Y Response variable
( )V11V10V9 V8V7V6V5V4V3V2V1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 16 (
.(SPSS
( )16
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Sig. F
Square Square Estimate F Change df1 df2
Change Change
66
( )18 .Stepwise
( )18
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
clay )(Constant 25.527 .757 33.708 .000
v11 51.085 11.693 .170 4.369 .000
Dependent Variable: clay
( )18 ( )25.527
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01
v11 ( )51.085 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01
v11 ( ).
:
= 25.53 + 51.1 11
Normality
test of residuals ( )02
( )07
.
27 26
.
61
28
68
:
( )Y Response variable
( )S5S4S3S2S1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise .
( )19
( .(SPSS
( )19
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square F
Square Square Estimate df1 df2 Sig. F Change
Change Change
Predictors: (Constant) s3 s1 s2 s5
Adjusted R Square R 2=0.148 ( )19
%14.8
(.)S5S3S2S1
R Correlation coefficient R=0.392
Sig. F Change .0.000
( )20 Stepwise
()S5S3S2S1 . ANOVA
( )02 ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Predictors: (Constant) s3 s1 s2 s5
( ) 02 .F
F=28.9 0.000
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01 .
( )21 .Stepwise
69
( )21
10
29
11
31 31
( )BADSCI
12
:
( )Y Response variable
( )si11si10si9si8si7si6si5si4si3si2si1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 00 (
.(SPSS
( )00
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square R Square F Sig. F
Square the Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
( ) 23 .F
F=41.116 0.000
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01 .
( )24 .Stepwise
13
( )24
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model Coefficients t Sig.
33 32
(
) .
14
34
12
:
( )Y Response variable
( )r12r10r9r8r3 2.21 2.25
SPSS Stepwise
.
( ) 05 (
.(SPSS
( )05
Change Statistics
( ) 02 .F
F=34.122 0.000 0.05
0.01 0.05 0.01
.
() 27
.Stepwise
16
( )27
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients
( )27 ( )921.049
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05 0.01
r10 ()-40.781
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01 r10 ( )
( )07 r9 ( )-42.216
0.05 0.01 0.007 0.05 0.01
r9 ( )
r3 ( )-305.841 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01 r3 (
) r8 ( )-533.979 0.05
0.01 0.000 0.05 0.01 r8
( ).
:
clay = 921.049 40.781 10 42.216 R9 305.841 R3 533.979 R8
11
36 35
18
:
( )Y Response variable
( )b7b1 2.212.25
SPSS Stepwise
.
( ) 02 (
.(SPSS
( )02
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square R Square Sig. F
Square the Estimate F Change df1 df2
Change Change
( ) 02 .F
F=46.593 0.000
0.05 0.01 0.05
0.01 .
( )30 .Stepwise
19
( )30
38 37
80
39
81
(
)
:
= 235.236 + 10.22 11 264.9102 3 + 192.1184 1 17.107 2
Sin Rn . Sn Vn :
1 4 5 1 )7 (3 1
= (25.53 + 51.1 ) + (184.040 1324.551
5 4 + 5 5 )5 (3 + 2 + 1
B3 B1 B5 B5
+ 960.592 )) ( 85.535 ( ) 34.816
B3 + B2 + B1 B7 B4
1 B1 B3 B1 B3
+ (26.204 + 116.335 ( + 92.994 ))
5 )(B1 + B3 B2
1 7 3 5
+ (921.049 40.781 ( ) 42.216 ( ) 305.841
5 2 5 7
7 1
( 533.979 ))) + (19.357 110.566 7 + 211.771 1
5 5
82
41
83
:
( )Y Response variable
( )V11V10V9 V8V7V6V5V4V3V2V1
.2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
()V9V7V6V4V11
.
( ) 11 (
.(SPSS
( )11
Change Statistics
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square R Square F Sig. F
Square Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
42 41
86
43
81
:
( )Y Response variable
( )S5S4S3S2S1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise .
( ) 14 (
.(SPSS
( )14
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square F Sig. F
Square Square the Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
Predictors: (Constant) s3 s1
( )14 Adjusted R Square R 2=0.188
%18.8
(.)S3S1
R Correlation coefficient R=0.436
Sig. F Change .0.000
( )35 Stepwise
()S3S1 . ANOVA
( )15 ANOVA
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
( ) 15 .F
F=75.288 0.000
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01 .
( )36 .Stepwise
88
( )12
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
)(Constant 37.668 2.133 17.659 .000
silt s3 -574.077- 78.916 -1.528- -7.275- .000
s1 379.177 68.995 1.154 5.496 .000
Dependent Variable: silt
( )12 ( )37.668
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01
S3 ( )-574.077 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01
S3 ( )
( )12 S1 ( )379.177
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05
0.01 S1 ( ).
:
= 37.668 574.077 3 + 379.177 1
Normality test
of residuals ( )44
( )45
.
45 44
89
46
90
:
( )Y Response variable
( )si11si10si9si8si7si6si5si4si3si2si1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 17 (
.(SPSS
( )17
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square Sig. F
Square Square the Estimate F Change df1 df2
Change Change
( ) 12 .F
F=38.301 0.000
0.05 0.01
0.05 0.01 .
( )39 .Stepwise
91
( )13
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
Model t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
)(Constant 29.232 5.160 5.665 .000
si2 72.657 11.956 .321 6.077 .000
silt si1 105.685 17.976 .284 5.879 .000
si11 96.340 18.433 .458 5.227 .000
si7 23.577 8.835 .259 2.669 .008
( )39 ( )29.232
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01
Si2 ( )72.657 0.05
0.000 0.05 0.01 Si2
( ) ()13
Si1 ( )105.685
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05 0.01
Si1 ( )
Si11 ( )96.340 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01 Si11
( ) Si7
()23.577 0.05 0.01
0.008 0.05 0.01 Si7
( ) .
:
= 29.232 + 72.657 2 + 105.685 1 + 96.340 11 + 23.577 7
Normality test
of residuals ( )47
( )42
.
48 47
92
49
93
:
( )Y Response variable
( )r12 r11r10r9r8r7r6r5r4r3r2r1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 42 (
.(SPSS
( )42
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of
Model R R Square F Sig. F
Square Square the Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
94
( )40
51 51
96
52
91
:
( )Y Response variable
( )b7b4.b5b3b2b1
2.21 2.25 SPSS
Stepwise
.
( ) 41 (
.(SPSS
( )41
Change Statistics
R Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square F Sig. F
Square Square Estimate df1 df2
Change Change Change
98
( )45
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
Model t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
)(Constant 33.295 2.521 13.205 .000
silt B7 -140.532 9.955 -.756 -14.117 .000
B1 211.653 19.441 .583 10.887 .000
Dependent Variable: silt
( )45 ( )33.295
0.05 0.01 0.000
0.05 0.01
b7 ( )-140.532 0.05 0.01
0.000 0.05 0.01
b7 ( )
( )45 b1 ( )211.653
0.05 0.01 0.000 0.05 0.01
b1 ( ).
:
= 33.295 140.532 7 + 211.653 1
Normality test
of residuals ( )51
( )54
.
54 53
99
55
100
(
)
:
= 29.516 + 21.4224 + 84.1292 233.7754
23.839 +84.918 114.8154 3 + 75.8354
1 + 14.5314 2 + 21.137 1 + 19.268 11 + 4.7154
7 17.7474 10 + 20.8432 12 36.2036 8 +
26.1844 5 15.381 7 + 12.23 2 + 16.6338 9
28.1064 + 42.3306
Sin Rn . Sn Vn :
1 4 5 4 3 B4 B3
= (23.8 + 107.112 + 420.646 1168 .877 119 .195
5 4 + 5 4 + 3 B4 + B3 + 0.16
B4 B3
)
B4 + 6B3 7.5B1 + 1
1 )7 (3 1 B3 B1
+ (37 .668 574.077 + 379.177 )
5 (
5 3 + 2 + 1) B3 + B2 + B1
1 7 1 7 3
+ ( (23.585 88.737 ) ( ) + 104 .216 ( ) 181.018 ( ) + 130.922
5 2 3 5 2
5 4 3
( 76.905 )) ( ) + 61.150 ( ) + 83.169
4 3 5
1 B1 B3 B5 B7 B3 B4
+ (29 .232 + 72.657 + 105 .685 + 96.340 + 23.577
5 B1 + B3 B5 + B7 ()B3 + B4
B3 B4 1
)) + (33 .295 140.532 7 + 211.653 1
)(B2 B4 5
101
56
102
57
103
58
104
:
EML ERDAS IMAGINE
Soil Texture :
59 ERDAS
61
102
:
: ( ) -1
()
.
: -2
.
: -3
.
: ) (*.shp -4
.
: -2
.
: -6
.
106
:
29
:
One way ANOVA -1 :
101
:
One-way ANOVA
one way ANOVA ) 64(
ANOVA
Clay
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 140.037 6 23.340 6.684 .000
Within Groups 181.584 52 3.492
Total 321.622 58
Clay
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
4.486 5 52 .002
Means Plots
61
108
:
ANOVA
Silt
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 1119.069 11 101.734 5.570 .000
Within Groups 858.476 47 18.265
Total 1977.546 58
Means Plots
62
109
:
ANOVA
Sand
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 2129.661 15 141.977 14.838 .000
Within Groups 411.446 43 9.569
Total 2541.107 58
Means Plots
63
110
:
111
:
:
.. .1
.2010/1431
.. .2
( . .3
2004 )
.)191 194 (
.) ( . .4
.
.)23 34 ( 2002 -
:
5. Kawabata; k.Ichii; Y. Yamaguchi. (Global monitoring of interannual changes in
vegetation activities using NDVI and its relationships to temperature and
precipitation). International journal of remote sensing Vol: 22 Num: 7 2001 P:
1377-1382.
6. Al-Bakri J. T. Suleiman A.S. (NDVI response to rainfall in different ecological zones
in Jordan). International journal of remote sensing Vol: 25 Num: 19 2004 P: 3897-
3912.
7. Anne Jacobsen Niels H. Broge and Birger U. Hansen Monitoring Wheat Fields and
Grasslands Using Spectral Reflectance DataCopenhagen Danmark1995 P:6.
8. Anne Jacobsen Niels H. Broge and Birger U. Hansen. Monitoring Wheat Fields and
Grasslands Using Spectral Reflectance DataCopenhagen Danmark1995 P:6.
9. Anne Jacobsen Niels H. Broge and Birger U. Hansen. Monitoring Wheat Fields and
Grasslands Using Spectral Reflectance DataCopenhagen Danmark1995 P:6.
10. Bartholomeus H. Epema G. Schaepman M. 2007. Determining iron content
in Mediterranean soils in partly vegetated areas using spectral reflectance and imaging
spectroscopy. Int J Appl Earth Obs 9(2) 194-203.
11. Ben-Dor E. 2002. Quantitative remote sensing of soil properties. Advances in
AgronomyVol 75 75 173-243.
12. Ben-Dor E. Banin A. 1995. Near-Infrared Analysis as a Rapid Method to
Simultaneously Evaluate Several Soil Properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59(2) 364-372.
13. Breunig F.M. Galvao L.S. Formaggio A.R. 2008.Detection of sandy soil surfaces
usingASTER-derived reflectance emissivity and elevation data: potential for the
identification of land degradation. Int J Remote Sens 29(6) 1833-1840.
112
14. C. Domenikiotis; N. R. Dalezios; A. Loukas; M. Karteris. (Agreement assessment of
NOAA/AVHRR NDVI with Landsat TM NDVI for mapping burned forested areas).
International journal of remote sensing Vol: 23 Num: 20 2002 P: 4235-4246.
15. Chen Z. M. Babiker I. S. Chen Z. X. Komaki K. Mohamed Kato k. (Estimation of
interannual variation in productivity of global vegetation using NDVI data).
International journal of remote sensing Vol: 25 Num: 16 2004 P: 3139-3160.
16. Crist E. P. and Cicone R. C. Application of the tasseled cap concept to simulate
thematic mapper data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing Vol: 50
1984 P:343-352.
17. Description of the data set. metart.fao.org/GBR/E-VVGTGL.htm.11/20/2006p:1
18. Dobos E. Micheli E. Baumgardner M.F. Biehl L. Helt T. 2000. Use of
combined digital elevation model and satellite radiometric data for regional soil
mapping. Geoderma 97(3-4) 367-391.
19. Drummond S Joshi A Sudduth KA (1998)Application of neural networks:
precisionfarming. In: Proc. IEEE Int. conf. NeuralNetworks IEEE Piscataway. NJ
PP215-211.
20. Earthobservatory. Nasa.gov/Library/Measuring Vegetation/ measuring vegetation
2.htm1. 11/20/2006.
21. Earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/Measuring Vegetation/measuring vegetation
2.htm1.11/20/2006.
22. e-SOTER www.esoter.net 2008 Acces date: 11/07/2012.
23. Gessler P.E. Moore I.D. Mckenzie N.J. Ryan P.J. 1995. Soil-Landscape
Modeling and Spatial Prediction of Soil Attributes. Int J Geogr INF Syst 9(4) 421-
432.
24. Gessler P.E. Moore I.D. Mckenzie N.J. Ryan P.J. 1995. Soil-Landscape
Modeling andSpatial Prediction of Soil Attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 9(4) 421-432.
25. Greve M.H. Kheir R.B. Greve M.B. Bocher P.K. 2012. Quantifying the ability
of environmental parameters to predict soil texture fractions using regression- tree
model with GIS and LIDAR data: The case study of Denmark. Ecol Indic 18 1-10.
26. Hijmans R.J. van Etten J. 2011. raster: Geographic analysis and modeling with
raster data.
27. Huete A. R. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote sensing of environme nt.
Vol: 25. No: 3.1988 P: 295-310.
28. Huete A. R. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote sensing of environme nt.
Vol: 25. No: 3.1988 P: 295-310.
29. Huete A. R. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote sensing of environme nt.
Vol: 25. No: 3.1988 P: 295-310.
30. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000. P: 361.
31. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000. P: 362.
113
32. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000. P: 365.
33. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000. P: 365.
34. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000. P: 365.
35. John R. Jensen. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.
Prentice Hall series in Geographic Information science. Keith C. Clarke Series Editor
Printed in the United States of America 2000.
36. K. Ichii; A. Kawabata; and Y. Yamaguchi. (Global correlation analysis for NDVI and
climatic variables and NDVI trends: 1982-1990). International journal of remote
sensing Vol: 23 Num: 18 2002 P: 3873-3878.
37. Lillesand T.M. Kiefer R.W. Chipman J.W. 2008. Remote sensing and image
interpretation. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Hoboken.
38. M. E. Budde; G. Tappan; J. Rowland; J. Lewis. And L. L. Tieszen. (Assessing land
cover performance in Senegal West Africa using 1-Km integrated NDVI and local
variance analysis). Journal of arid environments Vol: 59 Num: 3 2004 P: 481-498.
39. Mary Pax Lenney Curtis E. Woodcock John B. Collins and Hasan Hamdi. (The
status of Agricultural Lands in Egypt: the Use of Multitemporal NDVI Features
derived from Landsat-TM) .REMOTE SENS. ENVIRON.56:8-20 (1996): New York
P: 9.
40. McBratney A.B. Odeh I.O.A. Bishop T.F.A. Dunbar M.S. Shatar T.M. 2000.
An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma 97(3-4) 293-
327.
41. McKenzie N.J. Ryan P.J. 1999. Spatial prediction of soil properties using
environmental correlation. Geoderma 89(1-2) 67-94.
42. MODIS Vegetation Indices ( MOD13 series) TBRS team The University of Arizona
July 2002.
43. MODIS Vegetation Indices (MOD13 series). TBRS team The University of Arizona
July 2002.
44. MODIS Vegetation Indices( MOD13 series) TBRS team The University of Arizona
July 2002.
45. MODIS VegetationWorkshop. Missoula. Atmospheric noise reduction July 2002
46. Mulder V.L. de Bruin S. Schaepman M.E. 2012. Representing major soil
variability at regional scale by constrained Latin Hypercube Sampling of remote
sensing data. IntJ Appl Earth Obs.
47. Mulder V.L. de Bruin S. Schaepman M.E. Mayr T.R. 2011. The use of remote
sensing in soil and terrain mapping - A review. Geoderma 162(1-2) 1-19.
48. NDVI & EVI Relationships. Important notes. TBRS team The University of Arizona
July 2002.
114
49. NDVI&EVI Relationships .important notes. TBRS team The University of Arizona
July 2002.
50. Neter J. Kutner M.H. Nachtsheim C.J. Wasserman W. 1996. Applied linear
statistical models. Tom Casson.
51. Ninomiya Y. Fu B.H. Cudahy T.J. 2005. Detecting lithology with Advanced
Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) multispec tra l
thermal infrared "radiance-at-sensor" data. Remote Sens Environ 99(1-2) 127-139.
52. Pachepsky Y.A. Timlin D.J. Rawls W.J. 2001. Soil water retention as related to
topographic variables. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(6) 1787-1795.
53. Qi J. Kerr Y. H. and Chehbouni A. External Factor Consideration in Vegetation
Index Development. Proc. of Physical Measurements and Signatures in Remote
Sensing ISPRS 1994 P: 723-730.
54. R. Granados-Ramrez; T.Reyna-Trujillo; G.Gmez-Rodrguez; J.Soria-Ruiz. (Analys is
of NOAA-AVHRR-NDVI images for crops monitoring) International journal of
remote sensing Vol: 25 Num: 9 2004 P: 1615-1627.
55. Rossel R.A.V. Walvoort D.J.J. McBratney A.B. Janik L.J. Skjemstad J.O.
2006. Visible near infrared mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance
spectroscopy forsimultaneous assessment of various soil properties.Geoderma 131(1-
2) 59-75.
56. Rouse J.W.; R.H. Haas; J.A. Schell; D.W. Deeriing and J.C. Harland. Monitoring
the vernal advancement of natural vegetation. NASA/GSFC Final Report Greenbelt
MD 1973. P: 371.
57. Scull P. Franklin J. Chadwick O.A. McArthur D. 2003. Predictive soil mapping:
a review. Prog Phys Geog 27(2) 171-197.
58. Selige T. Bohner J. Schmidhalter U. 2006. High resolution topsoil mapping
usinghyperspectral image and field data in multivariate regression modeling
procedures Geoderma 136(1-2) 235-244.
59. Svetlichnyi A.A. Plotnitskiy S.V. Stepovaya O.Y. 2003. Spatial distribution of
soil moisture content within catchments and its modelling on the basis of topographic
data. J Hydrol 277(1-2) 50-60.
60. T. J. Farrar; S. E. Nicholson; and A. R. Lare. (The influence of soil type on the
relationships between NDVI rainfall and soil moisture in semiarid Botswana. I II:
NDVI response to soil moisture). Remote sensing of environment Vol: 50 Num: 2
1994 P: (121-133) (107-120).
61. Todd M. Scanlon; John D. Albertson; Kelly K. Caylor and Chris A. Willia ms.
(Determining land surface fractional cover from NDVI and rainfall time series for a
savanna ecosystem). Remote sensing of environment Vol: 82 Num: 2-3 2002 P:
376-388.
62. TuckerC.J. Spectral method for determining the percentage green Herbage material
blipped samples. Remote sensing of environment Vol: 9 no: 2 1980 p: 175-181.
63. Van den Boogaard K.G. Tolosnana R. Bren M. 2011. compositio ns :
Compositional Data Analysis.
112
64. van den Boogaard K.G. Tolosnana R. Bren M. 2012. Package 'compositio ns'
CRAN.
65. Vegetation Indices Radiometric and Biophysical Roles. TBRS team The Univers ity
of Arizona July 2002.
66. What is NDVI? DOCUME~1/Mous/LOCALS~1/Temp/1DQJBOM7. htm
11/20/2006 P:1.
67. Wold S. Esbensen K. Geladi P. 1987. Principal Component Analysis. Chemometr
Intell Lab 2(1-3) 37-52.
68. Zhai Y Thomasson JA (2000) Intelligent algorithms distinguish soil patterns
from remote-sensing data. ASAE Paper No 221250ASAE St. Joseph ML.
69. Ziadat F.M. 2005. Analyzing digital terrain attributes to predict soil attributes for a
relatively large area. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69(5) 1590-1599.
70. Weicheng Wu The Generalized Difference Vegetation Index (GDVI) for Dryland
Characterization journal of Remote Sensing 29 January 2014.
71. Deering D.W.; Rouse J.W.; Haas R.H.; Schel J.A. Measuring Forage Production of
Grazing Units from Landsat MSS Data. In Proceedings of the 10th Internatio na l
Symposium of Remote Sensing of Environment Ann Arbor MI USA 610 October
1975; Volume II pp. 11691178.
72. Faour Ghaleb Mhawej Mario and Abou Najem Sandra Regional Landsat-Based
Drought Monitoring from 1982 to 2014 climate journal 7 August 2015.
73. Jieying Xiao Yanjun Shen Tateishi Ryutaro Mapping soil degradation by topsoil
grain size using MODIS data2004.
74. Hakan Mete Dogan Mineral composite assessment of Kelkit River Basin in Turkey
by means of remote sensingJournal Earth system science118 No62009.
75. Ahmed Madani Assessment and Evaluation of Band Ratios Brovey and HSV
Techniques for Lithologic Discrimination and Mapping Using Landsat ETM+ and
SPOT-5 Data International Journal of Geosciences 2014 5 5-11
76. M. W. Mwaniki a M. S. Moeller b and G. Schellmann c A comparison of Landsat 8
(OLI) and Landsat 7 (ETM+) in mapping geology The International Archives of the
Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XL-
7/W3 2015.
77. Md. A. Islam P. S. Thenkabail R. W. Kulawardhana R. Alankara S. Gunasinghe
C. Edussriya & A. Gunawardana Semi automated methods for mapping wetlands
using Landsat ETM+ and SRTM data International Journal of Remote Sensing
January 2014.
78. Igor Ogashawaraand Vanessa da Silva Brum Bastos A Quantitative Approach for
Analyzing the Relationship between Urban Heat Islands and Land CoverRemote
Sensing Journal2012.
116