Science Technology Polocies in Korea

2016-072
R&D

R&D
.
2016. 2.
:
:
:

1.
2015 10.
5 . 75 ( )
, , CEO
300 3 8
.
(Creating our Common
Future through Science, Technology and Innovation)
. ,
(Jeremy Rifkin) (Aaron Ciechanover),
() CEO 80 , ,
. , ,
,
. , ,
3 OECD
. KISTEP R&D
(STI Policy and R&D) OECD OECD
.
R&D 1-1
. KISTEP
, (Torbjrn Re Isaksen)
, (Turki Saud Bin
Mohammed Al Saud) (KACST) ,
, (Curtis Carlson) SRI International CEO
. , , ,

. , ,
, R&D ,
(Open Innovation)
.

(Jose Angel Gurria Trevino) OECD
OECD , ,
2015 OECD (STI) ,
OECD ,
(Frascati) .
20 21 OECD 10

. 1963 2004 OECD
,
.

: , ,
3 .
,
,
, .
23
OECD
.
, 30
.

.
2. R&D
OECD ,
OECD , OECD
.
(national innovation system) (system innovation),
(open innovation), (sustainable development)
(next production revolution), -
(open science), (skill) , ,
7 .

(1)
,
1), 2010
,

.

(innovation system) .

.
(innovation system) (system innovation)
(upstream) /

(), (, )

, , , ,

, , , ,
Agency

(, , )
(niches), (regime), (landscape)

, /
.
1)

,
( ),
, , ,
(< 2> ).

. Frank Geels
,
(state-influence market economies)
.

.

.
(2)
, ,
,
.
(Chesbrough)

,
.
EU R&D ,

2.0
. , , ,
, .
2.0 2013 ,2) ,
, 4 , .
, : EU (Open Innovation
Strategy and Policy Group, OISPG) .
, ,
.3)
.
, :
,
. ,

.
, 2.0
.
, 4 :
(triple helix model) 4
(quadruple helix model) ,
,
. 3

4 .

2.0
(Closed Innovation) (Open Innovation) (Open Innovation 2.0)
(subcontracting) (cross licensing) (cross-fertilization)

(linear subcontracts) (triple helix) (quadruple helix)
- (win-lose) - (win-win) - (win more-win)
(value chain) (value network) (value constellation)
, :
? 0

. 2.0
(prototyping)
. ,

.

. ,
.

.
.
( ),
(/ ),
(/) .

.
.
(3)
1987 (Brundtland)
(Our Common Future)
, 2 .
, , ,
.

.
Post-2015 .
Post-2015 (Millennium Development Goals, MDGs
(2001~2015)) , 2016~2030
. Post-2015
(shared ambitions for
a shared future : (universality), (transformation), (people-centered),
(planet-sensitive), (leave no one behind))
. (Dignity, ),
(People, , ), (Prosperity,
), (Planet, ),
(Justice, ),

(Partnership, ) 6
. , (ODA
) (
) , 2015 7 3
.
(global value chain) ,
, (digital economy)
.
4)
,
. OECD . ,
, ,
, , , ,
, , .
, OECD 5) ,
.
.
, R&D
(upstream activity) ,
(downstream activity) .
(emerging economies) OECD
-(non-production)
,
.
.

.

,
. ( )
. ICT

, . ICT ,
FTA GATT 6) ,
ICT
. ICT
, ICT
,
.

,
. ,
, (dynamism)
, ( )
, , , ,
.
,
, , .
(4) -
ICT, ,
. ICT

.
,

.

, . OECD
, , , ,
5 .

(open access models), (ensuring safety and
trust), (valuable change),
(employment & skills) .7)

(open science)
. ,
.

. , ,

. ,
,
. .

.
,
.
(5)

. R&D
,
,

.
OECD
.
(skill)
.8) (soft
skills) .

.
.
, ,
, (soft
skills), .
.

OECD 21
.9) , (technical skills) know-what
know-how ,
. , (thinking
and creativity skills) , , ,
. , (social and behavioral skills), , ,
, , , , , ,
. OECD
, ,
,
.10) , (developing relevant skills).

. , (activating skills
supply). ,
,
. , (putting skills to effective use).
,
.

.
.

,

.

.
,
.
,

.
,

,
.
(6)

.
,
.

.
.
.
, , ,
.
, ,
, , ,
. EU 16 .

, , ,

+

(RTO)

(

)
OECD ,
OECD 1) 2)
3) .
OECD , OECD , OECD ,
,
.
, ,
,
.
, OECD APEC
.

.

.

.
, , , , , ,

. (ITER),
(CERN), (ISS), ,

, ODA
.
(7)

.

. , ,
,
. ,

. , 2009 4
,
. , , ,

.
OECD , ,
, 11) .
, 4 . ,
.

, ,
.
, ,
.
. , , ,

.
, . ,
.
. ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
.
.
- - -
.
.

.
. ,
.
GSF
. ,
. ,

. ,
.
,
.
, , ,
, ,
. ,
.
( , )
.

3.

. EU Horizon 2020(2014), OECD Innovation Strategy(2015),
New High Tech Strategy(2015), Strategy for American Innovation(2015),
(2015),
(2015)
.
,

.

.
, , SNS

.
2015 5 R&D R&D
.
.
OECD

.
.
, , , ,
R&D
.
.
, ,
, - ,
, ,
,
.

.

1
1.

3
2.

5
II.

7
1. 2015

9
2.

13
3.

14
III. R&D

29
1.

31
2.

33
3.

39
4.

68
5.

108
6.

118
7.

134
8.

147
IV.

171
1. 2015

173
2. R&D

174
3.

184

186
1.

195
2. 1-1

335

< 2-1>

9
< 3-1> (sub-functions)

35
< 3-2>

37
< 3-3>

38
< 3-4>

43
< 3-5>

43
< 3-6>

44
< 3-7>

47
< 3-8>

51
< 3-9>

71
< 3-10> 17

72
< 3-11>

75
< 3-12> 1

112
< 3-13>

135
< 3-14>

136
< 3-15>

138
< 3-16> SIN

140
< 3-17>

141
< 3-18> Horizon 2020

143
< 3-19> FP7

146
< 3-20> 3.11

150
< 3-21>

154
< 3-22>

155
< 3-23> ()

163
< 3-24>

164
< 3-25>

166
< 3-26>

166

[ 1-1] OECD

4
[ 2-1] 2015

9
[ 3-1]

34
[ 3-2] (NSI) (SSI) (TS)

36
[ 3-3]

38
[ 3-4]

41
[ 3-5]

42
[ 3-6]

46
[ 3-7] (20082010)

49
[ 3-8] (20082010)

50
[ 3-9] (20082010)

50
[ 3-10] (Innovation Ecosystem)

53
[ 3-11] 4

54
[ 3-12]

54
[ 3-13]

55
[ 3-14]

82
[ 3-15] OECD R&D

85
[ 3-16] ICT

86
[ 3-17] ICT

89
[ 3-18]

90
[ 3-19] 1

98
[ 3-20] 2

99
[ 3-21] SCP 10

104
[ 3-22] 3.0

106
[ 3-23] ()

114
[ 3-24] OECD Skills Strategy framework

131
[ 3-25] OECD

132
[ 3-26] OECD (PISA)

132
[ 3-27]

145
[ 3-28]

146
[ 3-29]

153

1
1.

. ,

. UN ,
, Post-2015 .

, OECD 2007 (Innovation
strategy) , 2015 .
,
,
.
,
. 2012 R&D 1,
2 R&D .
, OECD 52 OECD
. , OECD
, , CEO
.
OECD
. , 1-1
R&D
.
OECD
() (Creating Our Common Future through

Science, Technology and Innovation)
()

( ) 2015. 10. 19~20 (1.5) /
Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4

1 :
19
()
20 2 :
3 :
() :
4
2.

R&D , 2015 10
,
.
R&D

. R&D
8
R&D , .
,
KISTEP ,
.
, KISTEP ,
, CEO ,
, OECD
.

.
KISTEP
, ( )
.
5
II
II.

7
1. 2015
2015 10.
5 . 75 ( )
, , CEO
300 3 8
.
10.19 () 10.20 () 10.21() 10.22() 10.23()
107
OECD OECD OECD

- : / ,
- :
- : ,
1-1
OECD
OECD
9
(19) (Creating our
Common Future through Science, Technology and Innovation)
. ,
((Jeremy Rifkin) (Aaron Ciechanover),
() CEO 80 , ,
. , ,
,
. , ,
3 OECD
. KISTEP R&D
(STI Policy and R&D) OECD OECD
.
OECD , ,
2015 OECD (STI) ,
OECD ,
(Frascati) .
20 21 OECD 10

. 1963 2004 OECD
,
.

: , ,
3 .
,
,
, .
2004 OECD
,
.
10
,

( ), ,
,
, ,

,
,

OECD , ,
, ,
, ,
,

23
OECD
.
, 30
.

.
11
OECD
OECD (OECD Innovation Strategy)' OECD

2010
. OECD 2015(The Innovation Imperative
Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being)
.
,
, .
,
, ,
, ,
.
,
(Knowledge Based Capital, KBC)
,
.
.12)

.
: ,
, ,
12
2.

2015 10 19 . 70
KISTEP, STEPI .

, OECD
.
,
.
, ,
. 4
12 . OECD back-to-back
,
.
1 OECD
R&D ,
, .
2
, ,
. 3

, ,
,
. 4

,
, .
2~4 ,
.
.
13
3.
. 1 :National System of STI
(1) 1-1 : STI Policy and R&D

, , ,
.
.
1-1-1. Torbjrn Re Isaksen(The Norwegian Ministry of Education and
Research) :
.
, ,
. R&D
.
1-1-2. H.H. Dr. Turki Saud Bin Mohammed Al Saud(King Abdulaziz City
for Science and Technology) : 2030
The National Science, Technology and Innovation
Plan(NSTIP) ,
1 2014 . 2 R&D
, .
KACST
.
1-1-3. Dr. Chilhee Chung(Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology) :
R&D . R&D
, R&D
.
In-house R&D ,
.
1-1-4. Curtis Carlson(Practice of Innovation) :
.
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
.
14
(2) 1-2 : Impact Assessment of STI Investment
, , .
,
.
.
1-2-1. Carmen Vela Olmo(State for Research and Innovation of Spain) :

.
, , , STI
,
. STI
,
.
.
1-2-2. (Elsevier) :
. ,
Research Impact Assessment(RIA)
, .
1-2-3. Sergio Bertolucci(CERN) :
.
.

.
(3) 1-3 : Science Education, HRD

,
.
, .
.
1-3-1. (Pohang University of Science and Technology) :
.
.

.
15
1-3-2. Jan-Anders E. Mnson(EPFL) :
,
,
. ,
.
.
1-3-3. Mark Allin(John Wiley & Sons Inc.) :
.
.
, .
1-3-4. Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai(Asian Institute of Technology) :

.
. ,
.

.
(4) 1
, , ,
.
.

. STI .
STI ,
, .
, STI
. zoom in
zoom out .
,
.
STI
.
16
.
.
,

.
.
.
. 2 :National System of STI
(1) 2-1 : Toward Personalized & Precision Medicine

.
.
2-1-1. ( ) :
,
.
(augmentation technology),
(replacement &
regeneration technology),
(biogerontology technology) . ,
.
2-1-2. () :
,
,

.

,

.
17
2-1-3. () : .

.
.

.
(2) 2-2 : Next Generation Energy R&D Strategy

, ,
, .

.
2-2-1. ( ) : , ,

.

.

.
2-2-2. Detlef Stolten(Aachen University of Technology) :
.
.

. .

.
.
2-2-3. () :

.

, .

.
18
(3) 2-3 : Big Data & IoT
,
. ICT

.
2-3-1. () :
.
.
,
, ,
.
.
IBM
(cognitive computing) .

.
2-3-2. () :

.
,
. ? ?
? .
2-3-3. () :
.
.
.
SKT 5G AII-IT ,
.
.
.

. SKT
.
19
2-3-4. () : 5
2015 CES
.
ARTIK, Simband, SAMI .

. ( )
. LPWA
( ) .
(4) 2

,
.
2-1 ,
,

.
.

. ,
.
.
2-2
.

.
.
70

.
30% ,
.
20
2-3 ICT
.
,
.
, .

,
-
.
. 3 : STI for the Creative Economy
(1) 3-1 : Innovation Platforms
- ,
,
.
3-1-1. Ulrich Dropmann(Nokia) : 5G , , ,
. 5G 5G
, ,
. , ,
5G
. 5G 2018 5G
2020 5G .
3-1-2. Jim Newton(Tech Shop) :
,
(maker space).
, ,
.
, . ,
, GE, DARPA
.
3-1-3. Anna-Marie Vilamovska(Secretaryf or Innovation Policy to the
President of the Republic of Bulgaria) :
. 3
21
,
1 . 2015 11
(STP) .
STP (regional growth catalyst factor)
.
(2) 3-2 : Smart Manufacturing

.
3-2-1. Reimund Neugebauer( ) :
(application-oriented research)
(tactile internet) . , ,
, (data latency) ,
.
.
3-2-2. Kegan Schouwenburg(SOLS) : SOLS
, (fragmented production)
. (limited accessibility) .
(mass customization) SOLS 100%
(leverage).
QC .
. 3D ,
(generative design), 3D
? ,
(, ) ,
, , , (shin guards) .
3-2-3. ( ) : 2014
,
R&D .
, 113
.
4 , (digital automation
layer) (business layer) . R&D
22
R&D ,
. , CPS, IoT
.
(3) 3-3 : Convergence with the Arts, Cultures and Humanities
, , TV, , (city renovation)

.
3-3-1. Michael Hawley(founder of MITs GO Expeditions program) :
. , , .
(the plasticity of processing
elements) . , , , ,
,
physical fabric (woven and blended) .
. (the
Arab Spring revolution)
. , .
, , ,
(autonomous robots) .
3-3-2. (YouTube) : K-Pop
. K-Pop ,
, .
K-Pop .

. .

.
23
(4) 3
,
.

. ,
1 2
. 1
1 NAVER
.
, , 3D
,
. 5G , ,
.
, 5G R&D .

.
, .

. 3D
(mass customization) .
(confusion) .

.
.
ICT ,
.
, online offline
. ,

. ,
.
24
. 4 : STI for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth
(1) 4-1 : Climate Change & Environment
.
4
( , UNFCCC , , ) .
4-1-1. rjan Gustafsson( ) :
,
.
, .
4-1-2. Jason Spensely(UNEP) :
. UNFCCC CTCN CBD
.
CTCN , , 3
.
4-1-3. Kazuo Yamamoto() :
.
, , .
.
.

.
4-1-4. () :
. 30

.
, , ,

.
(2) 4-2 : S&T Global Cohesion
.
(SDGs) POST-2015
25
(appropriate technology)
. SDGs
.
, Post-2015
3 .
4-2-1. Paul Polak(Colorado-based non-profits International Development
Enterprises(IDE)and D-Rev) :
, .
.
. , ,
.
4-2-2. Cristina Martinez( ) :
,
. Post-2015

. Post-2015
.
4-2-3. ( ) : ,
.
.
, ,
.
(3) 4-3 : Global Cooperation, Research for All

.
, 3 .
4-3-1. Caroline S. Wagner( ) :
.
, , .

.
26
4-3-2. Eva Akesson( ) : ,
.
.
.
4-3-3. Arvid Hallen( ) :
. EU, NSF
.
.

.
(4) 4
, ,
.
4
.
, .
.
. ,
.
. IPCC ,
.
. ,
.
.
4-2
,
.
, , , ,
.
. ( 90%
) .
,
.
27
4-3 ,
.
, ,
.
, .

. .
, ,
.
III
III. R&D
29
1.
. OECD (Committee for S&T Policy, CSTP)

, OECD CSTP
.
(STEPI) (CSTP )
CSTP OECD
.
2013 3 102 CSTP
, ( ),
, , ,
, , Systems Innovation
.
2013 10 103 CSTP
, ,
, Innovation Policy Platform, ,
, Frascati Manual .
2014 3 104 CSTP OECD ,
(Synthetic Biology), (Research Excellence),
, NESTI , OECD
(Innovation Strategy) .
2014 10 105 CSTP 2015
OECD ,
(Key theme) (topic), (Streeing group)
, ()
.
2015 3 106 CSTP
.
.
, ,
(EU, ), (, ),
(), (BIAC(OECD ), )
.
(,
31
), ,
(EU, , ).
() (, BIAC),
(),
(, ) . 21
( (Open science) )
, ( , )(, ),
(), (BIAC), (EU),
G7
.
.
(
, , , ), BIAC
.
OECD 2 , ,
, , ,
(, , ) .
,
IP-Sharing Office ODA
,
.
6
, , , 21 (,
), , ,
.
.
6 OECD CSTP
.
(Knowledge Based Capital, KBC), (Global Value Chain, GVC),
(System Innovation) ,
, , 21
.
32
,
,
.
OECD
.
.
OECD ,
OECD , OECD
7
. , ,
, - ,
, , 7
.
2.
. (National Innovation System, NIS)
(1)
(National Innovation System) (Freeman, 1987)

,
.

. ,
, , ,

.

( & , 1998). Lundvall (1992) -

. Nelson & Rosenberg (1993)
33

,
.

,

.
Arnold & Kuhlmann (2001)

.
(2)
(sub-functions)
,

.
.
34
Hekkert et al. (2007) Bergek et al. (2005) Chaminade & Edquist (2005)
creating and changing

entrepreneurial activities entrepreneurial experimentation
organizations
provision of R&D
knowledge development knowledge development
provision of education and
knowledge diffusion and diffusion
training
articulation of quality
influence on the.
guidance of the search requirements from the demand
direction of search
side
formation of new product

market formation market formation
markets
incubating activities
financing of innovation
resources mobilization resource mobilization
processes
provision of consultancy
services
creation /
legitimation
change of institutions
creation of legitimacy
development of positive networking and interactive
externalities learning

(RIS), (SIS),
(TIS) . ,

.
35

.
Chaminade & Edquist(2006)

.

.
-
- Lock-in problems : ,

- (hard and soft institutional problems) :

- :

()
36
,
.
R&D (provision of R&D)

(competence building)
(formation of new product markets)

(demand-side activities) (articulation of quality requirements)
(creation and change of organizations)

, ,

(interactive learning, networking, and knowledge integration)
(creation and change of institutions)
(incubation)
(financing)
(consultancy services)
. (system innovation)
2010

.

, .

(grand)

.
37

(innovation system approach) (system innovation)
upstream focus on knowledge production and consumption/use
focus on improving the functioning of existing

focus on shift to a new (socio-technical) system
systems
focus on speed (knowledge flows) and outputs additional focus on direction of innovation
(patents, products) (problem and goal-oriented)
focus on generic conditions and system elements focus on concrete technologies and sectors
that favour innovation in an abstract sense (consumers, firms, industries, special interest,
(mainly knowledge) public)
acknowledgement of different interests, strategy,

limited attention for agency
conflict, power struggle, disagreement
methodologically advanced (indicators, methodologically open (new topic and intrinsically

measurement, benchmarking) more open, with maybe not one best recipe)

(new mission) [ 3-3].
38
.

.
,

.

.
Geels
(state-influence market
economies)
.

.

.

.
3.
(1)

.
,
, ,
, ICT ,
.
39
20 ,
.
,
,
. ,
, .

,
.

.
.
,

.
.

. , ,
,
,

.
.

.
IT
, /
. ,
,
.
ICT ,

.
, ,
40
,
. ,
open source
. , ICT
.
,
. ,

.
, .
(2)
, ,

.
Chesbrough
. Chesbrough , , ,
,

,
.
41
Chesbrough
,
. , ,
,
.
.
- (licensing-in)
-
- (joint venture)
-
-
- (licensing-out)
- (spin-off)
- ( )
- (: open source s/w)
- (user innovation)
, ,
, .
-
- OEM
-
42
,
.

Not invented here / Best from anywhere: good ideas are

We can do it, we will do it widely distributed
- -

- -
- ,
first mover advantage :
-
- , -
R&D
- -
- : - : /
IP
- -
-

-
- , - /, BM

- -
,
.

.

.

R&D /
(/)
- R&D
IP/
-
R&D

/

-

- vs.

43
(3)
(outside-in) (inside-out)
.
,

.

. ,

(license-in),

,

,
(license-in)
(license-out) .

( )

,
( ) CRO

/

,

( )

NineSigma

, ,

, open
source S/W
44

, ,

, ,

(spin-off)

(4)

Chesbrough (Open Innovation) ,

.
,
.

, , ,
.

.
,
, ,
.
,

(architectural innovation) . Henderson &
Clark(1990) , , ,
, ,
.
Chesbrough
,
,
.
45

.

.
, , , , , ,
.
, , ,

.
(1)

OECD
OECD (DSTI) (STP) 2008 10

(OECD 2008). OECD 2005 3 R&D
12
19 .
.
46
R&D

- S&T
- S&T
- (, , )
S&T -
(coherence)
-
-

-
- R&D - R&D
R&D - -

- R&D - R&D

-
-

-
-
-
- R&D

- R&D
-

-
- R&D
-

-
-
-
-
-
- R&D

-
- S&T
-

-
-

-
-

- -

-
-
- -

- 2 - 2
R&D OECD .
, .

.
47
, () .
, ,

.
, S&T .
,
.
, . R&D
, R&D
.
, .

.
.
, .
(nodes)
. , , ,
(intermediaries)
.
, IPR .
(clarification of research exemption)
(non-exclusive licenses)
evergreening .
, IPR
.
OECD 13
,
,
.
48
49
,
.
50
EU 2.0
2.0
(Closed Innovation) (Open Innovation) (Open Innovation 2.0)

(subcontracting) (cross licensing) (cross-fertilization)

(linear subcontracts) (triple helix) (quadruple helix)
- - -
(win-lose) (win-win) (win more-win)

(value chain) (value network) (value constellation)
,
. EU 2.0
R&D , ,
,
.
51
, , Europe 2020
, , , ,
, ,
.

, .
24%
32% (Salmelin, 2015).
EU 2.0
, ,
, ,
.

,
.
2.0 2013 Salmelin & Curley(2013) ,
, , 4
, .

.
,
.
.
EU (Open Innovation Strategy and
Policy Group, OISPG) [ 3-10] .
, ,
,
( & , 2013).

.
52
,
.
, ,
3 .

.
Schrange(2004)
(Invention+Adoption=Innovation)
, ,
.
,

,
.
, , ,

.
2.0 ,
, .
53
(triple helix model)
4 (quadruple helix model) ,
,
.
3 ,

4 .
.
,

,
.

(Salmelin, 2015).
54
?
0

.
2.0
(prototyping) ,
.
,
.
,
, , , , ,
.
, [ 3-13]
,
.
55

2015
2015 11 . 50
1 ,
,
.

.
, , , .
2 1 1 2.

.
,
.
, OECD 18 .
, ,
.
, , ,
.
,
.

. 2020

1% .
.
(SIP)
()
,
(Council for Science, Technology and Innovation, CSTI)
2014 .
2014 5
10 (PD ) ,
Governing Board .
56
PD Governing Board
.

.

.

.

. 3.0
.

.

.
() 2007 2.7% 2010 2.1%
.

3 .
3
. 3
, ,
, ,
.
,
, ,
, ,
.
57
(2)
P&G

.
,
. P&G
.
R&D . R&D
R&D C&D (Connect
and Development) , P&G
.
P&G .
, ,
R&D , , . ,
70 (technology entrepreneurs)
. ,

. (NineSigma, Innocentive, YourEncore, Yet2.com )
,
. ,
. , . ,
.
,
.
, NIH(Not Invented Here) .
, P&G

.

,
.
58
(Dupont)
/ ,
.
, (supply chain)
.

.
.
.
,
, , , ,
. ,

, Dupont Ventures . , NT,
BT .
NT, BT
.
.
, IA&L
, , yet2.com . ,

. , CTO
, CTO .
, . ,

OZ . , , , ,
, .
(Intel)

.

,
.
59
IBM
,
.

.
.
, Intel Technical Journal
. ,
. , .

. , ,
UC , 3
Lablet .
, 20
20 . Lablet
, 5~10
. .
, Intel .
,
. Intel
IT
Intel
.
Intel
, IBM AT&T
.

.
(Google)
60

. , ,

, .
.
, , . ,
. ,
. ,
& , ,
, . ,
Contest Innovation ,
. ,
.
,
(security) ,
. (OHA)
IT
.

, IT/
, /
. post catch-up
.
.
, BPRM( ) . ,
NGV . ,
. IT/
,
/ . ,
.
61

, ,
.

, (, , ), (, )
.
POSCO

, /
,
.
.
, .
, . , /
. ,
. ,
. , . /RIST ,
.

,
, .
LG
LG P&G .
,
.
LG .
, .
R&D
. ,
. , license-in . ,
license-out .
62
J&J .
,
,
.
, . NIH
.
. 1
, ,
,
.

,
.

.
,
.
.
, .
/ .
. closed
beta test, open beta test lead user ,
. , /,
. ,
EA
.

,

.( )
,
.
.
63
NHN
NHN SDS (spin-off)

.
(),
.
/
.
NHN .
, iN .
, // .
, ()
, (
). ,
/ .
iN
,
, iN
.
SK
SK ,
.
,

.

, IT

.
SK .
,
. R&D
, . , , ,
64
, ,
. , ,

.
SK
, .
.
LG
LG ,
/ , .
.
LG .
.
, . ,
(2). , PRM-TRM
, , . ,
(challenge solution, I-forum, Tech Fair). ,
NineSigma . ,
( OLED ).
,
, , NIH ,
,
.
(1) R&D
,
.
.

.
65
R&D .
R&D ,

.
R&D .

.
.
, ,

.

.
,

.
R&D . R&D
.

.

.

,
.
,
, , .
, , ,
.
66
(2)

, / ,
, ,
.
, , , ,
,
.
,
( ),
(/ , ),
.

.
( ),
(/ ),
(/) .
(3)
, ,
, .
,

.
.
(open science initiative) ICT
.

.
.
,
(IPR sharing)
67
. IPR
IP
.

.

.
(4)
,
.

.
(corporate venturing)
, 2
.
IPO M&A
.
.
4.
(1) (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs)
(Sustainable Development)13)
1987 (Brundtland)
(Our Common Future)
,((environmentally sound and sustainable development)

(Sustainable development is development that
13) Hamilton (2004)
68
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs).
2 .
, , ,
.
.
, .

.

.
.
, , 3
, ,
. , ,
.

. ,
,
, .
Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) 14)
1972 (1968 4 ,
,
) (The Limits to Growth)
(equilibrium) .
,
--
.
.
(United Nations Conference on
the Human Environment, ) ,
( ) , .
14) (2012)
69
10 1982
(United Nations Conference on Environment and Development,
) , .

.
1983 12 (World Commission on Environment
and Development, WCED) .
1987 ,
, ,

. 1987 2 27
. 2000

.
.
5 1992, ( )
. (1992 6 14) 1
, 21 Agenda 21
.
Agenda 21 (Council on Sustainable
Development, CSD) ,
.
.
2000 9 , UN 189
(Millennium Development Goals, MDGs) ,
, .
2015 , , 8
, , ,
, , , ,
, .
70
8 (goals) (targets)
1 1
5 2/3
3/4
HIV/AIDS
MDGs
2002
( ) ,
Agenda 21 Agenda 21
. 8 1972 ,
1982 , 1987 , 1992 2002
,

.
2012 6 20 Agenda 21
UN
(+2015)) . , (The
Future We Want) , , Agenda 21,
. 2015
MDGs (SDGs)
.
15) +20 1992 () 20

71
Post-2015 (Post-2015 Development Agenda) SDGs16)
Post-2015 MDGs(2001~2015) ,
2016~2030 .
2015 9 UN Post-2015 SDGs
.
20 UN
(Open Working Group) 17 (goals) 169 (targets)
, Post-2015 .
Post-2015
(shared ambitions for a shared future : (universality), (transformation),
(people-centered), (planet-sensitive), (leave no one behind))
. (Dignity,
), (People, , ), (Prosperity,
), (Planet,
), (Justice, ),
(Partnership, ) 6
. , (ODA )
( )
, 2015 7 3
.
-17 (Goals)
1. (end poverty in all its forms everywhere)

2. , (end hunger, achieve food security and improved
nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture)
3. (ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages)
4. (ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote
lifelong learning opportunities for all)
5. (achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls)
6. (ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation
for all)
16) (2015)
http://www.google.co.kr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=4&ved=0CDYQFjADa
hUKEwiP1pbKwdLHAhWj6KYKHflKCjs&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mofa.go.kr%2Fwebmodule%2
Fcommon%2Fdownload.jsp%3Fboardid%3D235%26tablename%3DTYPE_DATABOARD%26seqno
%3D02efe3f9dfcc004f9bf9d025%26fileseq%3Dfb7065025040022ff6070fc3&ei=19vjVc-OIaPRmwX5
lanYAw&usg=AFQjCNFlKcgbw9_3UAxnSIDd-pI4F1hwfg&cad=rjt
72
-17 (Goals)
7. (ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all)
8. (promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and
productive employment and decent work for all)
9. , , (build resilient infrastructure, promote
inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation)
10. (reduce inequality within and among countries)
11. (make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable)
12. (ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns)
13. (take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*)
* UN(UNFCCC) (primary)

14. (conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and
marine resources for sustainable development)
15. , (protect, restore and promote sustainable use of
terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forest, combat desertification, and halt and
reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss)
16. (promote peaceful and inclusive societies for
sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable
and inclusive institutions at all levels)
17. (strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the
global partnership for sustainable development)
(Sustainable Consumption and Production, SCP)17)

.

(Green Economy) .
SCP 1992 Agenda 21 .
2002 Rio+10 ( )

.
SCP
(Johannesburg Plan of Implementation, JPOI) . JPOI

10 (10FYP SCP) , UNEP(
) UNDESA() UNCSD
(Marrakech Process) .
17) (2013) (2012)
73
10FYP SCP UN, , NGO
, ,
,
.
2012 , +20
10 (10YFP SCP) ,
UNEP(United Nations Environment Programme,
) .
10YFP SCP . ,
(decoupling), , , ,
, ,
, , , ,
.
. (SCP)
, ,
,
, // ,
, ,
, 3R(Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) ,
// .
18)-
,
,
.
, 1
cleaner production, eco-efficient
production . 2
( )
life-cycle thinking, closed-loop production
, . 3

industrial ecology . ,
18) (2012)
74
(ecoinnovation) , EU

.

()
,
.
, ----
,
.
,
,
.
()

cleaner production

eco-efficient production
( , ,
)

life cycle thinking

(green supply chain
, (green supply chain)
management)
(CSR, Corporage social responsibility)

closed-loop production , ,

closed-loop production ,
industrial ecology

, ,
eco-innovation ,
( )
2012 (Rio+20) SDGs 1 2030

,
75
. 2020~2030
. Herman Miller
2020
. 2020

, 2030
.
2030

. 2050
,
,
.

, .
Post-2015 UN (Scientific Advisory Board of

the UN Secretary-General, SAB)19)
UN (Executive Heads)
.
. ,
. ,
. .
.
.
.

. UNESCO Irina Bokova
, UN
. . ,

. .20)
19) UNESCO (2015)

20) (2014)
76
, , (Science, Technology and Innovation,
STI)
. STI Post-2015 SDGs
,
.
STI (game changer,

, , , ) . , ,
, , .
, , ,
. STI ,
STI . ,
.

.
.
, .
STI
. , STI R&D .
SDGs , STI
(national minimum target investments) ,
. ,

. ,
, ,
, .
,
. , STI
-- (science-policy-society
interface) . , ,
, /, ,
. , , ,

. , Post-2015
77
.
, STEM
. SDGs STI
.
(2) (Next Production Revolution)21)

(, , ) .

. ,
, ,
. .
(policymaker)
.
( ) , 50
. R&D, ,
, ,
(Knowledge-Based Capital, KBC)
. Paul Krugman(1994) ,
, .(productivity isnt everything,
but in the long run it is almost everything)
22)

,
. OECD .
, , ,
, , , ,
, , .
21) OECD (2015a)
78

.
, 20%34%
.
.
,
.
,
. GDP ,
2 ,
4
.
R&D R&D
. R&D
,
. R&D
, .
, ( )
R&D
.
(income)
.
.
.

.
. ,
, .

.
.
.

.
79

. .
,
.
.
,
, (
) .

,

. (GVC)
.
, ,
.
.
OECD
35% .
R&D
. , ,
(organisational capital) .

, .

R&D ,

.

. (satellite account)
GDP .
: ,
,

80
.
OECD , , (ICT)
ICT .

. (
)
.
.
KBC ,
. (global value chain, GVC)
, , (digital
economy)
. ,

. (natural churn)
, .
( )
.
.
()
, .
( )

.
.
,

.
22) OECD (2013c)
81

OECD
,
, .
, , 20
( , , )
( , ICTs) .
, , , , , . ,
, ICT

. Mokyr
,
.(OECD 2014b)
,
.
. 2000 OECD
.
[ 3-14] (global frontier, GF :
100 ),
(non-frontier firm), . GF
2000 . GF 3.5%
, 0.5% .
.
82
. GF
? ?
GF ?
, GF
, .
,
.
. KBC GVC
. GF ,
. GF
, ,

.
GF
.
? . ,
GF , ,

. , GVC , (FDI),
, .

.
, .
KBC GVCs - ?
GF KBC .
OECD KBC
. ,
R&D, , , , (branding), ,
.
, GVCs

. (superior capability)
, ,
, , .
83
KBC GVCs
. KBC
GVCs .
.
, R&D (upstream
activity) , (downstream
activity) . OECD
, , .
-(non-production)
,
KBC .
KBC GVC
.
, .
GVC
.
, GVC
.
,
GVCs .
.
Apple ,
. GVCs
, GVC
.
(supercharger)
KBC GVCs , KBC GVCs

. KBC( )
. ICT
, . ICT (container
shipping) , (intermodal movement)
, FTA GATT
84
. ICTs
ICT
.
ICT . R&D
, 27% [ 3-15].
ICT R&D 17%,
13.5%. . , ICT
, ICT
1/3 .
ICT . ICTs
. ,
. ICT

. ICTs ,
[ 3-16].
85
, IoT
( )
. , , ,
,
,
.
- ,

.
2 2011
2014 5 .
- TomTom
, , 9
60
.
.
86
-
,
. Drachten Philips
,
1/10 . ICTs
5 (2010 15%)
.
(Heading for the Next Production Revolution)
KBC , GVCs ,
.
. .
-
.
.
- , .
,
.
() .
- ,
.( )
- (synthetic biology) .
(sugar-based microbe)
(greening) .
, , ,
( ) .
- 3D .
( ).
87
- (bottom-up intelligent construction)
(self-assembly)
. ,
.
- 100
.
.
, , .
- ,
.
.
. McKinsey & Company 12 ( ,
(automation of knowledge work), IoT(), ,
, , , , 3D , ,
, ) 2025 ,
, 12 2025 14 33
.
GF ,
. , , ICT
(general purpose technology, GPT). ,

IT 5~6% .

.( )

.
. DNA
, .
, ,
. , ICT
ICT . ERP, ,
88
RFID ICT
. ICT
.
. , ICT
.

ICT .
,
,
. , (workplace innovation),
. ,
.
( )
.
, ,
.
, .
ICTs . ,
BT NT
. ,
[ 3-18],
.
89
(key policy issues)

, .
,
, , (dynamism)
, , ,
,
.
,
, , .
OECD .
(reallocating resources to
support innovative firms)

(, , , ) . ,
, ,

90
.
. .

.
.
, ,
. .
. ,
.
, ,
, .
ICT ,
( ) ( )
.
meeting the infrastructure challenges
, ,
.
, .
,
.
.
. OECD
, ( )
, ,
.
, .
OECD (
TV ) , (machine-to-machine
communications, M2M) .
IPv6 .
91
(building the skills for the next
production revolution)

. .
,
. (, , , ,
, ) . (,
, IT
,
.) , ,
,
.(
)

. (
) ,
,
, , , ,
,
.
.

.
.
(the rate of skill mismatch) OECD
.
. .
.

. OECD (2011a)
, .
92
(ensuring an enabling regulatory regime)

.
. ,
. ,
M2M .
(
)
(opening access) (assignment) a
.
SIM ,
,
.
M2M
.
,
.
KBC , .
,
mass .
. ,
.

. , ,
.
( )
.
.

.
( , R&D
).
(
) (
) .
93
- (opportunity-risk calculation)
() . ICT
. ICT
.(2010 5
Flash Crash 1
.)
.
. ICTs
, (BT
.)
.
.
(ensuring intellectual
property regimes are fit for the digital age)
(intellectual property, IP)

.
.

.
(disclosure requirements) (time limit),
.
, , , IP
. IP

. ,
.
21

.
,
.
.
IP IP ( , ,
(joint use)) .
94
(earning public acceptance)
.

.

. , (genetically-modified
organisms, GMO) .
.
, ,
.
, ( )
.
,
, ,
.
,
(decision automation) .
KBCs
, , . ,
, DDOS(distributed denial
of service) , , ,

. , ,
.

. KBCs

.
(tailoring innovation policies)

.
. , ,
95
(PPP) , .
(smart specialization) ,
.
,
, .

.

.
, R&D ,
, .
,
,
.
,
.
GF ( )
, (R&D
, )
.
(how to approach transition when economies

are fragile)
.
,
. OECD
. .

.

(, ,
).
. ,
(
96
.)
.
,
.
. ,
.
.
(technology prize) ,
.
-
.
/
.
(1)
23)
1992 UNCED
Agenda 21 ,
. ,

.

. 1996 3 Agenda 21
, 2000 6 5
. 2002 WSSD
(JPOI) , 2006
1 (2006-2010) UN .
23) (2014)
97
1 , , 3

5 , , ,
, ,
. 1

, , 5 48

, . ,
,
, 5 ,
.
98
2011 8 1
2 (11~15)
.
2
.
,
.
2 . ,
, ,
. ,
,
. ,
.
2000
.
99
SCP 10 24)
SCP
,
.
,
,
.

10 .
( )

, ()
,
, , , ()

, ()

, () ,

, ()
, , ()

.
, ,
. ,
, , , ,
, ,
1 .
,

. , ,
30
24) (2013)
100
, 150 ,
, .
20% ,

.

.
( )
,

. ( )

. ()
, ,
Eco-MCPs(material, component, products) B2B
. ()

. ( )
.

, (input factor) ,
(output factor) (eco-efficiency)
. 1998 (cleaner
production)
,
. 2011 Eco-Innovation

, 2000 (eco-design)
.

,
5~10 ,
.
101
( )
R&D .
,
, ( )

R&D , ( ),

, ( )

,
, ( )
, ,
( )
.
(corporate social responsibility)
2010 ISO 26000 , , ,
, ,
. ISO 26000
,
. CSR ,
, ,
.
( CSR )

,
, ,
CSR , (SCP )

, ,
CSR ,
, , Sustainable CSR
, ( )
, , ,
, ,
102
, (PSS ) (product service system)

PSS , (CSR )
CSR ,
CSR ,
CSR .
1997

.
,
7% .
,
, .
( )
, ,
(local food) ,
, ( )

, ( ) ,
Farm Stay, , ,
( ) ,
, ,
, , (
)
, ,
.
103
104
(2) - 3.0
IT
.
,
.
.
, , IoT
70~80% . CAD
,
SW . , HW
,
.

.
4 , 13
.
3.0 IT ,
,
.
105
106
25)
, , , , ,
4T ,
. , ,
. ,
.
, , .
,
(big picture) .

. 2014 6
3.0

.
, ,
R&D .
, ,
.
, , ,
.
,
. ,
, ,
U
. ,
, .

,
, . ,
,
. R&D
,
,
25) (2014)
107
, ,
, .
R&D R&D
, ,

. ,
, .
(, ,
) .
,
. , ,
R&D
,
.
5.
. 26) (OECD 2013d)27)
(1)
, ,
.
,

.

.

, .
26) (Open Science) , (OA : Open Access Publishing),

(OD Open Data Platforms), ICT (, , ,
) .
27) (2014)
108
(2)

, , ,

. ,
,
.
, , :
,
EC OpenAIRE Wellcome Trust
, .
,
.

.
Elsevier
,
,
.
(3)
OECD
,
.

.
.
OECD NTIS(
) .
109
(4) (Open Access)28)

29) , ,
.
, , ,
. (public fund)

.

.

. OECD 2004 1
(Declaration on Access to Research Data From Public
Funding)
.

30) .

.
, ,
,

.
.
28) (2010)
29) , .
, .
. , , ()
.
(FTP) .
(archiver) (IT,
).
30) (Committee on Science and Technology)
(White House Office of Science and Technology, OSTP) .
110
. 31)
(1)
OECD (new sources of growth, NSG):
(knowledge based capital, KBC)
,
(Committee for Information, Computer and Communications
Policy, ICCP) (Committee on Industry, Innovation
and Entrepreneurship, CIIE) . 2010
OECD , 2011
,
.
2012 1 , , , ,
, , CIIE
, 2013 2 ICCP

.
ICCP 2
:
, , .
(2) 1
CIIE 1
,
.
R&D, , , , ,
,
(, ), (R&D, , ),
(, , , ) 3
. , , ,
KBC ,
,
KBC .
31) (2013)
111
OECD
, , ,
,
,
(< 3-12> ).
- R&D ,

- 1) , 2) ,
3) , 4)

- KBC ,

20012011 OECD 10 KBC
18% 47%

- 1) , , 2)

, KBC (,
, KBC GDP 2 ,
4 )
- R&D , R&D
KBC
, R&D
- 1) R&D , 2) ,
3)
- KBC ,

- 1) , 2)
, 3)
- KBC

- 1)
, 2) , 3)

- KBC
- 1)

2006 iPod 41,000( 14,000, 27,000),
2
112

- KBC

- 1) KBC
, 2) KBC

- KBC KBC
, KBC

- 1)
, 2) KBC , 3)
, 4)

- 1) KBC ,
, 2) GDP

-

- , 1) ,

2) , 3)

- KBC , KBC

- 1) , 2)

(3) OECD 32)
OECD
(data-driven economy) ,
(KBC; knowledge-based capitals)

. ,
.

, .
OECD ,
,
,
.
32) (2014)
113

OECD ,
2010 New Sources of
Growth; Knowledge-based Capital 2013 2
(The role of Data in Promoting Growth and Well-Being) .
OECD 1 3 ,
, ,
.
, ,
ICT ,
.
OECD ,
.
50
.
.

. 10
2014 ,
,

. OECD

, (smart health-care), , ,
5 .
114
, ,

. SNS
43% ,
, ()

. OECD

.
,
. 2013
6 OECD
. DNA
60% MRI , 260
DNA ,
2020 3
.
,
. GPS (60%),
(40%) ,
.
LBS(location based service) 2020 8
. OECD 2020
5 ,
CO
38 .
, OECD
(smart grid)
. OECD 2020
CO 20 79
, GE
1% 660 .
115
, OECD

.
,
2010 320
. OECD 23
, ,
1,5003,400 ,
, ,
3 100
.
OECD
.
, (open access models).

.
OECD , ,
, ,
.
(open innovation), (crowd-sourcing)
,
, .
, (ensuring safety and trust).

, OECD

, . SNS,
, ,
.
,

116
. OECD
(data related to identified or
identifiable individual subject) ,

.
, (valuable change). OECD

,

.

.
, (employment & skills).

,
. OECD
(data scientist) , ,
, , ,
. OECD
(digital divide)

.
14~19
.
OECD (ICCP),
(CSTP), (HC), (PGC)
, , ,
. 2016 OECD
Leveraging Innovation in the Information Economy for New (and the
Better) Jobs .
117
6.
.

.
R&D ,

.

.

.
4.0
,
(Lorenz et al., 2015).
OECD
, ,
,

.
(1)

.

(Musick & Webre, 2015).
,
2004
,
(, 2015; & , 2014).

.
118
,

.

.
(education) (qualifications)
. ,
,

.
/
(Deer, 2004).

,
.
,
,
,
(Deer, 2004).

(skills) .

, .
,
, .
(2)

. ,
, (Rogers, 2003). OECD
( ), , ,
119
(OECD 2007). , ,

.
(OECD 2011a).

.
?
.

(OECD 2010).
.

.
, ,
.
,
.

(Barrett & Moore, 2011; Savery, 2006).
.
,
(Fagerberg, 2005).
,
, .
.
,
.
120
,
. , , ,
.
.
. ,
. (learning by doing)
. ,
(Romer, 1994; OECD, 2012; Nelson & Romer,
1998; Foray & Lundvall, 1998).

.
(3) 33)

Toner(2011)
.

(Kim, 2002:91).

.

.

. (generic)
(employability) (De
Meulemeester & Rochat, 2004).
33) Toner(2011).
121

, , ,
.
OECD EU ,
,
(HM Treasury, 2004; De Meulemeester & Rochat, 2004; OECD, 2007).
.
, ,
.

. (Keep
& Payne, 2004). , , ,
, .
ICT
(Kim, 2002; Tether et al., 2005;
Taylor, 2006).
, ,

.
122
(low technology)

OECD (low technology)
(low innovation-intensive industries)
(Hirsh-Kreinsen, 2008: 20). (incremental
innovation)
. (low technology) GDP

.
(Hauknes & Knell, 2009).
,
.
. ,
GDP (Romer,
1994).
40
.
, ,
,
.

.(Fernandez
& Hayward, 2004).
123
(4)
,
,
, (Trilling & Fadel, 2009; Toner, 2004).

(HM Treasury, 2004; Sheldon & Thornthwaite, 2005; Martin & Healy, 2008).
, , IT, , ,
, , , , , , , ,
.
,
.
, , ICT , ,
,

(Keep & Payne, 2004) .
.

.
(Toner, 2011).

.

.
.
.

.

(Toner, 2011)

(problem-based learning: PBL)
.
, (Hoidn & Kkkinen, 2014).
124

.
. OECD
OECD 2015 5

(OECD 2015d).
.

,

. ,
.

.
OECD
.
(1)

. OECD
.

. OECD

.
. ,
125
,
.

(OECD 2011a).
,
(soft skills) .

.
.
, ,
, (soft
skills), .
.

.
(soft skills) .
,

. ,
.
,
(OECD, 2011a).
OECD 21
.
, (technical skills) know-what know-how
,
.
, (thinking and creativity skills) , ,
, . ,
,
.
.
126
(social and behavioral skills), , ,
, , , , , ,
. ,

. ,

.
(OECD, 2011a).

. 21
,

(Darling-Hammond, 2008: 1-2).

.
.

,
(Universities
UK, 2015).

(problem-based learning: PBL)
.

. (PBL)
.

(OECD, 2014b).
127
(2)

. OECD
, 25-34 1/3 3 , .
, , ,
.

(OECD, 2011b).
OECD
, 3 ,
.
.

(OECD, 2011b).
(3) 34)
OECD
.

.
.
(mixed)

.

.
.
, 3
.
, , , 3 ,
34) OECD(2011b).
128
. (vocational education
and training: VET)
. , ,
.

, .
.
.
.

.

.
3
.
.
.

.
.

.
. ,
. , ,
. .

. ,
,
.
129

,
.

.
.
(4) OECD
OECD ,
,
,
(OECD, 2012).
, (developing relevant skills).

.
(mix of skills) ,
.
, (activating skills supply).
, .
OECD .
, , .

. ,
,
, .
, (putting skills to effective use).
,
.

. .
.
130
.
OECD
,
.
, , .

.
[3-25], OECD (PISA) ,
[3-26]
.
131
132

.
, ,

.
(, 2012).

.

.
,
.

,
.
,
,

.
OECD
,

.
OECD
.
.
133
7.
.
(globalization) (knowledge-based
economy, innovative economy)
. ,

.
.

,
, .
OECD , G20 , APEC
,
. , ,
,
.
.

35).

. ,
,
.

OECD
.
35) (2010).
134
.
(1)
.
, , R&D ,
.

R&D

,
/

,

,

, R&D
, ,
,
, R&D ,

.

.
(2) 36)
.
,
36) OECD (2014a).
135
. ,
. BRICs,
, .

5 . , ,
, , , ,
. EU 16
.

, , ,

(RTO)

136

(3)
, .
.
, ,
. , ,
. ITER(2006), CERN(2006)

.
CGIAR(Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)

. CGIAR , 15

. 1980 2004
647 86
41% ( , 2012).

.
137
ITER(International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor)

,
EU ('88.4), ('03.1), ('03.6), ('05.12) 7
.
EU 45.46%, 6 9.09% ,

2003 6 ITER 10
.
CGIAR ITER

.
,
IPCC (UNEP)
(WMO)

CGIAR ,

1
,
,
ITER

CCS

138
. 37)
(1)
(National Science Board) R&D

, , ,
(International Science and Engineering Partnerships, 2008 2)
.
, AAAS 2008 7 (Center for Science Diplomacy)
. OSTP DOS OMB
.
: ,
(USAID) (U.S. Global Development Lab)

45 1,000 , 23
45 (Partnerships for
Enhanced Engagement in Research, PEER) ,
.
, , , ,
,
8 2011
40 190 .
(2)

2014 12 :
,
( , ,
, , , ).
37) OECD (2014a).
139
: (Science and Innovation
Network, SIN)
2007 (SIN)
SIN ,
.

.
(BIS) (FCO)
28~47 90 .
SIN .
, , EU, ,

, ,
,
, UN
One Health
, , ,

(3)

(2014 7 9) <
>
ASEAN .

.

,
ASEAN .
140
ASEAN , , ,
,
.
ASEAN

:
(SATREPS)
(JST) SATREPS
2014
(JICA)
. (ODA)
,
.
, ,
,
, .
(4)
12 5

.
- ,

-
-

, , EU ,

141
-

, ,

-
, ,
,
- , ,
, ,
, ,
R&D ,
(NSFC) ,
, , .
(CAS)
, , .
(5) EU
EU 7% , 24%,
32%, 32% . 2020
, ,
, .
(smart growth),
(sustainable growth), (inclusive growth) .
Horizon 2020
. 2014 2020 7 800 ( 100)
R&D EU . 2014 ,
, 3 .
(European Research Council)
(Marie-Curie)
142
18 30 .
ICT, , , , ,
15 , , , ,
, , , , , 24
28 .
,
.
, ,

, ,
, , ,
. OECD 38)
(1)
OECD , ,

.
. ,
.
OECD
.
(2)
OECD (2010) ,
. BRIC
.
5 OECD
. 1) 2)
3) .
38)OECD (2014a).
143
(3)
OECD .
OECD 2007 5 , , , ,
, 6 .
OECD
OECD
. , OECD , OECD
, ,
. OECD OECD

.
OECD .
OECD , ,
, , , UNCTAD, .
,
(APEC), UN, , UN, UN
, UN(UNESCO), (WTO) .
OECD , ,
. , ,
, NATO .
OECD OECD
.
(4)
OECD .
, OECD ,
OECD . 3
, , .
MDCR ,
.
, , , , ,
.
144
.
(1)
,

.

.
,
.
(2)
, ,
(ODA), R&D .
2014 6 28 202 3
. , EU, , ,
.
145
APEC, ASEAN OECD
CSTP . EU EU
Horizon 2020
.
Horizon 2020, EU , NCP , KONNECT, KIC-Europe
.
FP7 FP6 FP5 FP4
21 7 1 1 30 32%
3 1 2 6 6%
33 12 5 1 51 54%
6 6 6%
1 1 1%
64 20 3 2 94 100%
2015 ICT, ,
900 . -EU
.
.
OECD ,

.
.
146
, , , ,
, ,
.
(ITER),
(CERN), (ISS), ,
.
,
.
ODA .

.
, ,
, ,
.

, OECD APEC
.

.
8.
.
,

( , 2015 7 31)

. , , ,
,
. ,
, ,
147
. ,

,
.

.

. , , ,
, ,
.
OECD
.
.

.

. ,
,
. ,

. , 2009 4
,

. , , ,

.
(1)
2009 4, 300

2012 .

148
,
.
< >
1 .
TV ,

50km .
'
' .
6 1 7 .
45
.
'
" .

29 6.3
300 .
6 1 1 6,
900 (2012), 2 (201411)
, OECD (Global Science Forum, GSF)

2012 10 .
, ,
,
, ,

.
149
2011 3 11 ,
. ,
,
,
.

,
,
. ,

.
3.11 3.11
-

-

< >
1) , ,
2) (, SPEEDI)*
. ,
* ( 133)
,
, (SPEEDI
) ,
,
150
. OECD GSF
OECD GSF , , ,

39).
(1)

. (President's Council of Advisors
on Science and Technology, PCAST), (Council on
Science and Technology, CST), (Council for
Science, Technology and Innovation, CSTI) .
German
Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation (EIT) .
, ,
.
.
, ,
.
, .
(U.S. National Academy of Science, NAS)

. , (Science council of Japan)

. .
39)
151

(Chief Science Advisor, CSA) , ,

.
.
,
.
. 2014 8 , , ,
, , , ,
.
(2)
(1)

. (), (),
()
.
(2)

. ,
.
(3)

.
.

.
.
152

.

.
(4)
.
.

.
,
,

.
(3)
. ,
.
153

.

.

.

. ,
,
.
(4)
GSF ,
.
a. ,
b. () ,
c. ,
d. ,
e. ,
,
f.
,
g.

h.
i.
j.
k.
l.

40) . ,
, .
40) Kasagi (2011).
154

, , (
) ,

- ,
(5)
.

.

.
.

.
.
.
,
.
.
.
155
. , 2014 7 NGO

2014 11 .

.
, ,
, , , , ,

.
(6)
. ,
.

. (
, )
.

.
156

1. , ( )
a.
b. , ,
c.
2. (, , )
a.
b.
c. ,

d.

3.
a.
b.
c.
d.
OECD GSF
.
1)
.
2)
.

.

.
, , .
157
3)

. , ,
.

.
4)
.
.

, , .
. 41)
(1)
2009 3 9, (Scientific Integrity)

. , OSTP
. 2010 12 17,
.

120 .
(2010 12 17)
.
.
.
.
.
.
41) JST CRDS (2011.5).
158
1. . , ,
, .

.
.
2. . a)
, , ,
, b) ,
, c)
, d) .
3.
.
, , .
Open Government Initiative
. ()
, .
4. .
.
, ,
.
.

,
.
1. ,
.
2.
.
.
3. .
159
.
(GSA) ,
(Federal Advisory Council, FAC) ,
FAC .
1. FAC .
FAC .
2. ( )
() .
.
3. FAC , ,
. , ,
. FAC
.
4.
.
5. FAC , FAC

, .
.

. ,
,
.
1. .
2. .
3.
.
4. , , , TF
.
5.
.
160
2
. 1950
NAS (Atomic energy
commission, AEC) . AEC
NAS .
NAS
.
NAS NAS
.
1970 NAS
, ,
. 1997,
NAS
. 2009 NAS 2 6
70% . NAS 1000 .
1997
NAS
.
.
NAS .
(2)
1990 .
1986 1996

.
1996
. 2000, Lord Phillips
,
. 2007 12
(GoScience) .
161
2010 3 24, BIS
. , ,
.
2009 10
(David Nutt) .

, .
.

42) .
(1) , (2) , (3)
3 . 12,
.
(Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, BIS) (Government
Office for Science)
(Government Chief Scientific Adviser, GCSA)
2015 2 43).
GCSA 1964
(Chief Scientific Advisers, CSAs) .
GCSA
. (CST, GCSA, CSA)
. ,
(Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, SAGE) .
SAGE 2014 , 2009 H5N1 , 2010 ,
2011 .
GCSA
. SAGE
.
CSA ,
.
GCSA
.
42) Jha (2009).

43) Government Office for Science (2015).
162
.
.

.
.
(3)
(Berlin-Brandenburgische
Akademie der Wissenschaften, BBAW) 2004,
2008 .
BBAW 2,500(2009) 150
.
BBAW
.
.
.
.
44) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/scientific-advice-to-government-principles/
principles-of-scientific-advice-to-government
163
.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.
, .
( ) ,
.
.
.
.

.
(4)

45).

.
(National Institute of Science and Technology Policy, NISTEP)
DB
.
, ,
(Science Council of JAPAN) .
1949 84
210 , 2000 .
: ,
, 30
45) Sugiyama (2012).
164
. ,
.

.
,
,
.
, 46)
1. .
.
2. ,
.
, .
3. .
, .
.
4.
.
.
5.
, 2

.
6.
,
.
7. 2 4 .
8.
.
46) (2014).
165
.
127
.
.
. 1
. .

.
, ,
. ,

(, 2005).
100%
(
)

, IT&Health, , IT
PCAST47)
, , , ,

166

- ( , , ),
, , ,

Government
- ,
Office for

Science48)
- , , ,

- , , , , SAGE

-
-
- ,

49)
2020 9
- ,
,

ELSI(ethical, legal, social implications)

.
.
1) (responsible innovation) 50)

- , , , ,

, .
, (reflexive)

47) (2015).
https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2015/08/07/pcast-assesses-federal-information-
technology-rd (2015.8.11.)
48) Government Office for Science the next 5 year (2015.9.30. GOV.UK)
49) 2015
167
2) (post normal science)
-
,

*: Funtowicz & Ravetz (1994).
3) 51)
- , ,
()

: (2014).
50)
51)
168
.
,
,
.
52)
.
.

,
.
,
, , ,
.
,
.
169
IV
IV.
171
1. 2015
2015 10,
5 . 75 ( )
, , CEO
300 3 8
.
(Creating our Common
Future through Science, Technology and Innovation)
. ,
(Jeremy Rifkin) (Aaron Ciechanover),
() CEO 80 , ,
. , ,
,
. , ,
3 OECD
.
R&D 1-1
. KISTEP
, (Torbjrn Re Isaksen)
, (Turki Saud Bin
Mohammed Al Saud) (KACST) ,
, (Curtis Carlson) SRI International CEO
. , , ,
.
, ,
, R&D ,
(Open Innovation) .
OECD , ,
2015 OECD (STI) ,
OECD ,
(Frascati) .
173
20 21 OECD 10

. 1963 2004 OECD
,
.

: , ,
3 .
, ,
,
.
23
OECD
.
, 30
.

.
2. R&D
OECD ,
OECD
. ,
, , -
, , ,
7 .
(1) (system innovation)
,
53), 2010
,
.
53)
174

(innovation system) .

. (niches), (regime),
(landscape) ,
/
.

, ( ),
, , ,
.

. Frank Geels
,
(state-influence market economies)
.

.

.
(2) (open innovation)
, ,
,
.
(Chesbrough)

,
.
EU R&D ,

2.0
175
. , , ,
, .
2.0 2013 ,54) ,
, 4 ,
.
, : EU (Open Innovation
Strategy and Policy Group, OISPG) .
, ,
.55)
.
, :
,
. ,

.
, 2.0
.
, 4 :
(triple helix model) 4 (quadruple
helix model) , ,

. 3
4
.
, :
? 0

. 2.0

. ,

.
176

. ,
.

.
.
( ),
(/ ),
(/) .

.
.
(3) (next production revolution)
1987 (Brundtland)
(Our Common Future)
, 2 .
, , ,
.

.
Post-2015 .
Post-2015 (MDGs, 2001~2015)
, 2016~2030
. Post-2015
(shared ambitions for a shared future : (universality),
(transformation), (people-centered), (planet-sensitive),
(leave no one behind)) .
(Dignity, ), (People, ,
), (Prosperity, ),
(Planet, ), (Justice,
), (Partnership,
177
) 6 . ,
(ODA ) (
) , 2015
7 3 .
(global value chain) ,
, (digital economy)
. , OECD 56)
, .
.
, R&D
(upstream activity) ,
(downstream activity) .
-(non-production)
,
.
.

.

,
. ( )
. ICT ,
. ICT , FTA
GATT 57) ,
ICT
. ICT
, ICT
,
.

,
178
. ,
, (dynamism)
, ( )
, , , ,
.
,
, , .
(4) - (open science)
ICT, ,
. ICT

.
,

.

, . OECD
, , , ,
5 .

(open access models), (ensuring
safety and trust), (valuable change),
(employment & skills)
.58)

. ,
.

. , ,
.
, ,
179
.
.

.
,
.
(5)

. R&D
,
,

.
OECD
.

.59) (soft skills)
.
.

.
, ,
, (soft skills),
.
.
OECD 21
.60) , (technical skills) know-what
know-how ,
. , (thinking
and creativity skills) , , ,
. , (social and behavioral skills), , ,
180
, , , , , ,
. OECD
, ,
,
.61) , (developing relevant skills).

. , (activating skills supply).
,
, . ,
(putting skills to effective use).
,
.

.
.

.

.
,
.
,
.

,
,
.
181
(6)

.
,
.

.
.
.
, , ,
.
, ,
, , ,
. EU 16 .
OECD ,
OECD 1) 2)
3) .
OECD , OECD , OECD ,
,
.
, ,
,
.
, OECD APEC

.

.

.

.
, , , , , ,
182

.
(ITER), (CERN), (ISS),
,
, ODA
.
(7)

.

. , , ,

. ,
. , 2009
4
,
. , , ,

.
OECD , ,
, 62) .
, 4 . ,
.
, ,
.
, ,
.
. , , ,

.
, . ,
.
183
. ,
. ,
, ,
.
,
.
.
- - -
.
.

.
. ,
.
GSF
. ,
. ,

. ,

. ,
.
, , ,
, ,
. ,
.
( , )
.
3.

. EU Horizon 2020(2014), OECD Innovation Strategy(2015),
New High Tech Strategy(2015), Strategy for American Innovation(2015),
184
(2015),
(2015)
.
,

.

.
, , SNS

.
2015 5 R&D R&D
.
.
OECD

.
.
, , , , R&D

.
.
, ,
, - ,
, ,
,
.
185

Archibugi, D., & Lundvall, B. . (2001). The Globalizing Knowledge

Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arnold, E., & Kuhlmann, S. (2001). RCN in the Norwegian Research
and Innovation System: Background Report No. 12 in the
Evaluation of the Research Council of Norway. ISI,
Fraunhofer-Inst. Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung.
Barrett, T., & Moore, S. (2011). An introduction to problem-based
learning. New approaches to problem-based learning:
revitalising your practice in higher education, 3-17.
Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmarki, S., & Rickne, A.
(2005). Analysing the dynamics and functionality of sectoral
innovation systems a manual. In: 10 Year Anniversary
DRUID Summer Conference, Copenhagen, June 27 29.
Bernhofen, D. M., El-Sahli, Z., & Kneller, R. (2013). Estimating
the Effects of the Container Revolution on World Trade,
CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 4136.
Brundtland, G., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S., Chidzero, B., Fadika,
L., & Singh, M. (1987). Our Common Future (\'Brundtland
report\').
Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2006). Rationales for public policy
intervention from a systems of innovation approach: the case
of VINNOVA. Lund University, Lund.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006a). Open innovation: The new imperative
for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business
Press.
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006b). Open innovation: a new paradigm for
understanding industrial innovation. Open innovation: Researching
a new paradigm, 1-12.Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2014). Open
Innovation 2.0: The Big Picture in Open Innovation Yearbook
2014. European Commission.
Curley, M. (2014). Presentation on Open Innovation 2.0, Intel Labs
Europe Intel Corp.
186
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Introduction: Teaching and learning
for understanding in Darling-Hammond L., Barron, B.,
Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman,
T. D., Cervetti, G. D., & Tilson, J. L. (Eds.) (2008). Powerful
Learning. What We Know About Teaching for Understanding,
Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA. 1-9.
De Meulemeester, J. L., & Rochat, D. (2004). The European policy
regarding education and training: a critical assessment.
Deer, C. (2004). The expansion of higher education: economic
necessity or hyperinflation, in Hayward, G., & James, S. (Eds.)
, 203-218.
Doubleday, R., & Wilsdon, J. (Eds.) (2013). Future Directions for
Scientific Advice in Whitehall (PDF), CSaP/Alliance for Useful
Evidence.
European Commission (2012). Overview of international science,
technology and innovation cooperation between Member
States and countries outside the EU and the development of a
future monitoring mechanism.
Fagerberg, J. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. in Jan
Fagerberg; David C. Mowery; Richard R. Nelson. (Eds.) Oxford
University Press.
Foray, D., & Lundvall, B. . (1998). The knowledge-based economy:
from the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. The
economic impact of knowledge, 115-121.
Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovationin historical
perspective. Cambridge Journal of economics, 19(1), 5-24.
Funtowicz, S. D., & Ravetz, J. R. (1994). Uncertainty, Complexity
and Post-Normal Science, Environmental Toxicology and
Chemistry, 13(12), 1881-1885.
Gassler, H., Polt, W., & Rammer, C. (2008). Priority setting in
technology policy: Historical development and recent
trends. Innovation Policy in Europe. Measurement and Strategy.
Geels, F. (2013a). System Innovation: Dynamics and policy
implications.
187
Geels, F. (2013b). Keynote presentation at Swedish Ministerial
conference on Innovation Policy for the Future: System
Innovation for Societal Challenges, Job Creation and Sustainable
Growth, organized by VINNOVA (Swedish Innovation Agency),
12 December, 2013, Stockholm, Sweden (title: System
Innovation: Dynamics and policy implications).
Government Office for Science (2015). Chief Scientific Advisers and
their officials: an introduction.
Hamilton, K. (2004). "Accounting for Sustainability", in OECD
Measuring Sustainable Development: Integrated Economic,
Environmental and Social Frameworks, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Hauknes, J., & Knell, M. (2009). Embodied knowledge and sectoral
linkages: An input output approach to the interaction of
high-and low-tech industries. Research Policy, 38(3), 459-469.
Hayward, G., & Fernandez, R. M. (2004). From core skills to key
skills: fast forward or back to the future?. Oxford review of
Education, 30(1), 117-145.
Hekkert, M., Suurs, R.A.A., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R.
(2007). Functions of Innovation Systems: A new approach for
analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and
Social Change, 74(4), 413 432.
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990). Architectural innovation:
The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the
failure of established firms. Administrative science quarterly,
35(1), 9-30.
Hirsch Kreinsen, H. (2008). Low Tech Innovations. Industry and
innovation, 15(1), 19-43.
HM Treasury (2004). Science and innovation investment framework
2004 2014. London: HM Treasury.
Hoidn, S., & Kkkinen, K. (2014). Promoting Skills for Innovation
in Higher Education: A literature review of the effectiveness
of problem-based learning and teaching behaviors. OECD
Education Working Papers, No. 100; OECD Publishing.
Jha, A. (2009). Call for scientific advisers to be free from political
188
interference. The Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com
JST CRDS (2011).
, JST Center for Research and Development Strategy.
Kasagi, N. (2011). .
JST Center for Research and Development Strategy.
Keep, E., & Payne, J. (2004). I cant believe its not skill: the
changing meaning of skill in the UK context and some
implications. in Hayward G and James S. (Eds.), 53-76.
Kim, Y. H. (2002). A state of art review on the impact of
technology on skill demand in OECD countries. Journal of
education and work, 15(1), 89-109.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and
engineers through society. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Lorenz, M., Rmann, M., Strack, R., Lueth, K. L., & Bolle, M.
(2015). Man and Machine in Industry 4.0: How will Technology
Transform the Industrial Workforce Through 2025?: The
Boston Consulting Group.
Lundvall, B. . (1992). User-producer relationships, national systems
of innovation and internationalization. National systems of
innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive
learning, 45-67.
Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems
and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated
framework. Research Policy, 37, 596 615.
Martin, B., & Healy, J. (2008). Changing work organisation and skill
requirements, National Centre for Vocational Education
Research, Adelaide.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W.
(1972). The limits to growth. New York, 102.
Musick, N., & Webre, P. (2015). Chapter 1: Federal Policies and
Innovation, in Federal Influence on Innovation: Policy Effects
and Proposals, (ed) Young, R. A. New York: NOVA.
Nelkin, D. (1992). Controversy: politics of technical decisions.
Nelson, R. R., & Romer, P. M. (1998). Science, Economic Growth
189
and Public Policy, in Neef, Siesfeld and Cefola (Eds.), The
Economic Impact of Knowledge, Boston: Butterworth Heineman.
Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and
national systems. National innovation systems: a comparative
analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1-18.
OECD (2007). Local Innovations for Growth in Central and Eastern
Europe, Local Economic and Employment Development
(LEED), OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2009). Sustainable Manufacturing and Eco-Innovation
-Framework, Practices and Measurement, OECD Publishing,
Paris.
OECD (2010). The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start
on Tomorrow (Summary), OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2011a). Skills for Innovation and Research, OECD
Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2011b). Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of
Major Themes in the Literature, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2012). Better Skills, Better Jobs, Better Lives: A strategic
Approach to Skills Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013a). "Knowledge-based capital, innovation and resource
allocation", in OECD Supporting Investment in Knowledge
Capital, Growth and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013b). Background and Extended Outline of an Analytical
Report on system innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013c). Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital, Growth
and Innovation, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013d). Background Paper and the TIP Workshop on Open
Science and Open Data, The 42nd TIP Meeting Document,
OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013e). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard
2013: Innovation for Growth, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013f).PISA 2012Results, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2014a). Strengthening the OECDs global reach. Meeting of
the OECD Council at Ministerial Level. Paris, 6-7 May 2014.
190
OECD (2014b). "Economic performance and framework conditions
for innovation in the Netherlands", in OECD OECD Reviews of
Innovation Policy: Netherlands 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2015a). Enabling the next production revolution, OECD
Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2015b). Scientific Advice for Policy Making: The Role and
Responsibility of Expert Bodies and Individual Scientists, OECD
Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 21,
OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2015c). Enabling the Next Production Revolution: Issue
paper. Danish Production Council conference "Shaping the
Strategy for Tomorrow's Production". Paris, 26-27 March
2015.
OECD (2015d). OECD Innovation Strategy 2015: An agenda for
Policy Action, Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial
Level (Paris, 3-4 June 2015).
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations: 5th Edition, Simon
and Schuster.
Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. The
journal of economic perspectives, 3-22.
Royal Society (Great Britain), & Bodmer, W. F. (1985). The Public
Understanding of Science: Report of a Royal Society Ad Hoc
Group Endorsed by the Council of the Royal Society. Royal
Society.
Salmelin, B., & Curley, M. (2013). Open Innovation 2.0. European
Commission.
Salmelin, B. (2014a). Open Innovation 2.0-Fundamental Change in
Innovation Process. in Open Innovation Yearbook 2014.
European Commission.
Salmelin, B. (2014b). Open Innovation 2.0-Creating Ecosystems.
Salmelin, B. (2015). Open Innovation 2.0 Creations New Innovation
Space. in Open Innovation Yearbook 2015. European Commission.
Schrange, M. (2004). Interview in Ubiquity. ACM Publication.
Sheldon, P., & Thornwaite, L. (2005). Employability skills and
191
vocational education and training policy in Australia: An
analysis of employer association agendas. Asia Pacific Journal
of Human Resources, 43(3), 404-425.
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework
for responsible innovation, Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580.
Sugiyama, M. (2012). .
Taylor, J. (2006). Managing the Unmanageable. Higher Education
Management and Policy, 18(2), 1-25.
Tether, B., Mina, A., Consoli, D., & Gagliardi, D. (2005). A literature
review on skills and innovation: how does successful
innovation impact on the demand for skills and how do skills
drive innovation?. Department of Trade and Industry.
Toner, P. (2011). Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of
Major Themes in the Literature, OECD STI/CERI working
Paper Series: OECD
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life
in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
UNESCO (2015). Science, Technology and Innovation: Critical
Means of Implementation for the SDGs.
Universities UK (2015). The economic role of UK universities.
Wilsdon, J. (2014). Science Advice to Governments: Diverse systems,
common challenges. Auckland conference, 28-29 August 2014.
Wynne, B. (1991). Knowledges in context. Science, technology, and
human values, 16(1), 111-121.
(2014).
20142
Vol.84 No.2 195-201.
(2012). (2012116)
2012117 .
(2010). .
(2014). Post-MDG ,
.
(2010). :
. , 24(2),
192
1-25.
(2013). OECD . ,
25(10), 85-92.
(2012). (SDGs) .
(2015). EU 2.0 : ,
, 27(11), 1-22.
(2014). . Expert Bank .
(2013). ,
.
(2008). ,
08-03.
(2015). Post-2015 .
& (1998). . ,
108, 8-27.
& (2014). .
2014 (2014.10), 326-333.
(2012). : ,
.
, , , & Maliphol, S. (2012).
ODA , . 1-346, .
(2014). OECD : (TIP)
. , 5, .
(2014).
, & (2011).
, .
& (2010). R&D
. , 25(1), 23-31.
(2010). ,
. 27(1), 207-227.
3.0 (2014). 3.0 .
, , & (2014).
, .
& (2013). Open Innovation .
, 25(18), 42-49.
193
(2014). (SDGs) ,
.
OECD (2015). OECD (Innovation Strategy) ,
http://OECDmofa.go.kr/korean/eu/oecd/policy/conference/index.jsp
(2014). EU 2014.
(2014). , .
(2014). . VIP
Report. 576, 1-25.
(2012). . The HRD
Review, 2012.7.
(2015). 3 .
, 25(7), 20-27.
194
1

197
Contents
004 Welcome Message 017 Forum

018 Keynote Speech
005 Overview 020 Plenary Session

024 Session 1-1
032 Session 1-2
006 Program 037 Session 1-3
047 OECD SG Special Session
012 Floor Plan 051 Session 2-1
058 Session 2-2
063 Session 2-3
014 F&B
Lunch 071 Session 3-1
Coffee Break 078 Session 3-2
Cafeteria 086 Session 3-3
091 Session 4-1
100 Session 4-2
015 Official Program 109 Session 4-3
Opening Ceremony
116 Special Session 1
Welcome Dinner
131 Transportation
134 Sponsoring
Organization
199
Welcome Message
Honorable ministers, ambassadors, and distinguished guests!
On behalf of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning,

I am pleased to welcome you to the World Science and Technology
Forum.
As the global economy is still mired in slow growth, countries

around the world must seek fundamental solutions to build new
growth engines for job creation and to address global challenges
such as climate change.
Furthermore, as global issues such as worldwide epidemics cannot

be resolved without international collaboration, joint endeavors
Choi Yanghee across national borders are getting increasingly important.
Minister of Science, ICT and Future
Planning, Republic of Korea The World Science and Technology Forum, held under the theme
of Creating Our Common Future through Science, Technology,
and Innovation, will surely contribute to addressing these global
challenges.
Through the Forum, world-renowned scientists and leaders will

share their ideas on science, technology, and innovation such as
joint endeavors by government, industry, and academy for R&D
innovation and human resource training. There will be extensive
discussions on innovation platforms, smart manufacturing and
international cooperation for sustainable and inclusive growth are
expected to lead to meaningful results.
I hope that profound discussions through the Forum will help

participants of the OECD Ministerial Meeting seek fundamental
measures to resolve global challenges through science and
technology.
Once again I would like to extend a hearty welcome to all of you

participating in the World Science & Technology Forum.
Thank you very much.
4 World Science & Technology Forum
200
Overview
World Science & Technology Forum (WSTF)
Date October 19.(Mon), 2015
Venue Daejeon Convention Center (DCC), Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Theme Creating Our Common Future through Science, Technology and Innovation
Language English (Simultaneous interpretation provided in English-Korean)

Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Republic of Korea
Hosted by
THE COMMITTEE FOR THE 70TH ANNIVERSARY OF KOREAN LIBERATION
Background
The long-awaited OECD Ministerial is expected to provide new milestones for science, technology
and innovation (STI) for the next few decades. Setting these milestones will not be the sole purview
of the government but must be a joint effort in conjunction with businesses and academia. The World
Science and Technology Forum (WSTF) is organized by Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning in
conjunction with the OECD Ministerial Meeting, which will be held at the same venue (Daejeon, Korea),
to bring together the worlds most distinguished STI leaders and benefit from their inspiring visions and
scintillating insights into the future of STI.
Objectives
The World Science and Technology Forum (WSTF) aims to: 1) examine techno-economic paradigm
shifts of future technologies and innovations; 2) discuss our common global future that science and
technology will help create; 3) build a consensus on global cooperation towards addressing significant
shared challenges and empowering science and technology for better innovation; and 4) contribute
to the development of new innovation strategies for the next several decades by delivering the visions
and insights of STI leaders to the Ministerial.
Creating Our Common Future through Science, Technology and Innovation 5
201
Program
The WSTF consists of 12 breakout sessions in four thematic tracks and three special sessions.
Track 1 (National System of STI)

Examines how to establish an efficient and effective ecosystem for STI
Track 2 (STI that Shapes Our Future)

Identifies emerging technologies that will shape our future. Breakout sessions will address how these
emerging technologies affect our daily lives and values positively and/or negatively.
Track 3 (STI for the Creative Economy)

Addresses how we can make our economies more creative. It provides examples of diverse policy efforts
from the Korean Creative Economy initiative.
Track 4 (STI for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth)

Discusses how STI can contribute to sustainable and inclusive growth at the global level
Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4 Special

Time STI that Shapes STI for the Creative STI for Sustainable
National System of STI
Our Future Economy and Inclusive Growth
Session
Opening (Plenary)
09:00-11:00 Keynote Speech
Plenary Session (Nobel Laureates Lecture)

Session Session Session Session Talk Concert with
1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 Young Innovators
11:00-12:30 (STI Policy and R&D) (Toward (Innovation (Climate Change and
Personalized & Platforms) Environment)
Precision Medicine)
12:30-14:00 Luncheon
Session Session Session Session Opening the future
1-2 2-2 3-2 4-2 with Science,
14:00-15:30 (Impact Assessment (Next Generation (Smart (S&T for Global
Technology and
of STI Investment) Energy R&D Manufacturing) Cohesion)
Creativity
Strategy)
OECD SG Special
15:30-16:00 Session Coffee Break
(15:30-16:20)
Session Session Session Session Science Fiction
1-3 2-3 3-3 4-3 Becoming Reality
16:00-17:30 (Science Education, (Big Data & IoT) (Convergence with (Global Cooperation,
- Space Resource
HRD) the Arts, Cultures Research for all)
Exploration
[16:20-17:30] and Humanities)
202
Detailed Schedule
Opening Ceremony Grand Ballroom, 2F @ 09:00-11:00
Keynote Jeremy Rifkin Digital Korea, the Third Industrial

Speech Founder of Foundation on Economic Trends, USA Revolution, and the Zero Marginal Society
Plenary
Aaron Ciechanover The Personalized Medicine Revolution:
Professor of Tumor and Vascular Biology Research Center/Technion-Israel Are We Going to Cure all Diseases and
Session
Institute of Technology, Israel at what Price?
Noyori Ryoji Science and Technology Innovation for

Chemist, Recipient of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, Japan Our Survival
Session 1-1 : STI Policy and R&D Meeting Room 101-102, 1F @ 11:00-12:30
Youngah Park
Chair President of Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and
Planning (KISTEP), Republic of Korea
Speakers
Torbjrn Re Isaksen Realising the full potential of science,
Minister of Education and Research, Norway technology and innovation
H.H. Turki bin Saud bin Mohammad Al Saud

President of King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), The Innovation Ecosystem of Saudi Arabia
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Chilhee Chung Technology development through
Deputy President of Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT) /
open innovation and collaborations
Executive Vice President of Samsung Electronics, Republic of Korea
Curtis Carlson Learn Fast: Dramatically Improving
Former President and CEO of SRI International / Founder and CEO of
Innovative Performance
Practice of Innovation, USA
Session 2-1 : Toward Personalized & Precision Medicine Meeting Room 103-104, 1F @ 11:00-12:30
Chair
Young Il Yeom
General Director of KRIBB Ochang Branch Institute, Republic of Korea
Speakers
Jung-Shin Lee Future Medicine: Healthy Aging and
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Republic of Korea Perfect Medicine
Yoo-Hun Suh A Personalized Stem Cell Treatment for

Founding President of KBRI/President of Neuroscience Research Institute
Alzheimers and Parkinsons Disease
at Gachon University, Republic of Korea
Jin Soo Lee Precision Medicine-based Personalized
Chief Scientist of National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea Cancer Therapy
Session 3-1 : Innovation Platforms Meeting Room 105-106, 1F @ 11:00-12:30
Chair
Suh Byung-jo
President, National Information Society Agency, Republic of Korea
Panelists
Wonsik Choi
Country Head and Senior Partner of McKinsey & Company, Republic of Korea
Chong-Mok Park
Director of Technology Outreach at Naver LABS, Republic of Korea
Speakers
Ulrich Dropmann Innovation and Innovation Platforms
Head of Industry Environment at Nokia, Germany toward 5G
Jim Newton Inspiring a Nation of Makers

Chairman and Founder of TechShop, Inc., USA
Anna-Marie Vilamovska
Secretary for Innovation Policy to the President of the Republic of Bulgaria, Bulgaria
203
Session 4-1 : Climate Change and Environment Meeting Room 107-108, 1F @ 11:00-12:30
Chair
Kil-Choo Moon
Fellow at Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Republic of Korea
Panelist
Herv Le Treut
Director of Institute Pierre Simon Laplace, France
Brown Clouds over South and East Asia,
Release of greenhouse gases from a
Speakers
rjan Gustafsson thawing Arctic and how severe effects
Professor of Stockholm University, Sweden
from climate change on the Worlds 3
billion poorest may be avoided
Jason Spensley Addressing Climate Change and the
Climate Technology Manager at UNEP, UNFCCC Climate Biodiversity Crisis: Technology transfer and
Technology Centre and Network, U.K. deployment through the CBD and UNFCCC
Kazuo Yamamoto
Vice President for Resources Development, Asian Institute of Technology Mitigation and/or Adaptation on
(AIT) / Professor of Environmental Science Center and Graduate Program, Frequent Drought and Water Shortage
Department of Urban Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Yong Pyo Kim Fine particles problems in the mega-cities
Professor of Ewha Womans University, Department of Environmental
of Northeast Asia: A case study of Seoul
Science and Engineering, Republic of Korea
Special Session 1 : Talk Concert with Young Innovators Conference Room, 3F @ 11:00-12:30
Chair
Jong Guk Song
President of Science and Technology Policy Institute(STEPI), Republic of Korea
Bongjin Kim
Speakers CEO of Woowa Brothers (Korean Food Delivery App, Baedal Minjok), A story about Baedal Minjok
Republic of Korea
Won-Tae Kim Challenge and Achievement of
CEO of LOC & ALL (Driver Kim App), Republic of Korea Navigation App, Driver Kim
Jeffrey Lim How Google helps startups and

Head of Google Campus Seoul, Republic of Korea entrepreneurs grow
Session 1-2 : Impact Assessment of STI Investment Meeting Room 101-102, 1F @ 14:00-15:30
Chair
Jeong Dong Lee
Professor of Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
Carmen Vela Olmo
Speakers State Secretary for Research, Development and Innovation, Ministry of Impact Assessment of STI Investment
Economy and Competitiveness, Spain
Youngsuk Chi RIA (Research Impact Assessment) tools
Chairman of Elsevier, USA to shape the future of research
Sergio Bertolucci From Open Science to Open Innovation: A

Director of Research and Computing, CERN, Italy high impact strategy for a sustainable future
204
Session 2-2 : Next Generation Energy R&D Strategy Meeting Room 103-104, 1F @ 14:00-15:30
Chair
Changmo Sung
President of Green Technology Center, Republic of Korea
Bryan Hannegan The Global Imperative for Grid
Speakers Associate Director for Energy Systems Integration at
Modernization
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USA
Detlef Stolten Hydrogen as an Enabler for a Cleaner
Director of Jlich Research Center, Germany World
Sang Yup Lee Biorefineries for energy, chemicals and

Distinguished Professor, KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and
materials
Technology), Republic of Korea
Session 3-2 : Smart Manufacturing Meeting Room 105-106, 1F @ 14:00-15:30
Chair
Kunwoo Lee
Dean of College of Engineering, Seoul National University, Republic of Korea
Panelists Thorsten Buchta
Head of Digital Factory Department in DF/PD Division
of Siemens, Germany
Alex Jo
Managing partner of Deloitte Consulting Korea, Republic of Korea
So Young Baek
Director of Asia Sales and Marketing at 3D Systems, Republic of Korea
Speakers
Reimund Neugebauer FRAUNHOFER MODEL- The Innovation
President of the Fraunhofer Society (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft), Germany System
Kegan Schouwenburg Step into the Future - Smart

CEO and Founder of SOLS, USA Manufacturing
Kyoung Han Bae Korea Smart Factory Program

Vice President, Korea Smart Factory Foundation, Republic of Korea
Session 4-2 : S&T for Global Cohesion Meeting Room 107-108, 1F @ 14:00-15:30
Chair
Jeyong Yoon
Panelist
Seungju Baek
Senior Policy Advisor of OECD, Republic of Korea
The Business Solution to Poverty:
Speakers
Paul Polak Designing Products and Services for 3
CEO and Chairman of Windhorse International, USA
Billion New Customers
Technology and innovation for Inclusive
Cristina Martinez and Green Growth in the Post-2015
Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University, Australia
Agenda
Soo Young Chang The Zeitgeist of our time and the
Professor of POSTECH, Republic of Korea appropriate technology
205
Special Session 2 :
Conference Room, 3F @ 14:00-15:30
Opening the future with Science, Technology and Creativity
Seunghwan Kim Advancement of Science, Creative
Chair President of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Education and Maker Movement for the
Creativity, Republic of Korea future
Speakers
Gregory S. Boebinger Leading By Getting Out of the Way
Director of National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, USA
Opening the future with Science,
Alan Bishop Technology and Creativity: A view
Principal Associate Director at Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA through the prism of a premier National
Security Science Laboratory
OECD SG Special Session

(Innovation for Growth and Society : OECD Insights from the Innovation Strategy Meeting Room 101-102, 1F @ 15:30-16:20
and the Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015)
Mo- Angel Gurra
derator OECD Secretary-General, Mexico
Andrew W. Wyckoff
Speaker Director of the OECDs Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation
(STI), USA
Session 1-3 : Science Education, HRD Meeting Room 101-102, 1F @ 16:20-17:50
Seung Bin Park

Chair Vice President for Planning and Budget, KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute
of Science and Technology), Republic of Korea
Vice-
Myongsook Oh
Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hongik University,
Chair
Republic of Korea
Doh-Yeon Kim Education for the Next Generation
Speakers
President of Pohang University of Sci & Tech, Republic of Korea Leaders in Science and Technology
Jan-Anders E. Mnson Foster Talents to lead future prosperity

Head of Unit, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland
Mark Allin Protecting the Innovation Pipeline:
President and CEO, Wiley, USA Reskilling of the Research Workforce
Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai Internationalization of Multidisciplinary

President of Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand Education and Research
Session 2-3 : Big Data & IoT Meeting Room 103-104, 1F @ 16:00-17:30
Chair
Yoon-Deock Lee
Professor at Sungkyunkwan University, Republic of Korea
Speakers
Jeffrey A. Rhoda Big data, A new path for value
General Manager of IBM Korea, USA
Rajiv Niles
Director of Digital Transformation and IoE Acceleration at Cisco Systems The Internet of Everything
(USA) Pte Ltd,. Australia
Kang-Won Lee IoT and Data Analytics: A New Growth

SVP of Corporate R&D Center, SK Telecom, USA Opportunity
Kyungwhoon Cheun IoT Vision

Executive Vice President (EVP) of Samsung Electronics, Republic of Korea
206
Session 3-3 :
Meeting Room 105-106, 1F @ 16:00-17:30
Convergence with the Arts, Cultures and Humanities
Esko Aho
Chair East office of Finnish Industries and Finnish-Russian Chamber of Commerce,
Executive Chairman of the Board, Former Prime Minister of Finland, Finland
Panelists
In Keun Lee
Head of Land and Housing Institute, Republic of Korea
Jin S. Lee
Director of Future IT Convergence Lab / Head of Dept. of Creative IT
Engineering, Republic of Korea
Speakers
Winy Maas
Architect-director of MVRDV, Netherlands
Michael Hawley Conflusion: Life After Convergence
Director of EG, USA
Sun Lee The future of content
Head of Music Partnerships of Google, Republic of Korea
Session 4-3 : Global Cooperation, Research for All Meeting Room 107-108, 1F @ 16:00-17:30
Chair
Jaeho Yeom
President of Korea University, Republic of Korea
Panelists
Nagano Hiroshi
Chair of OECD/Global Science Forum, Japan
Dong-Pil Min
Emeritus Professor, Physics Department of Seoul National University,
Republic of Korea
Speakers
Caroline S. Wagner The Influences and Opportunities of the
Wolf Chair in International Affairs of The Ohio State University, USA Global Network of Science
Eva kesson Innovation and research - a local

Vice-chancellor of Uppsala University, Sweden perspective on global challenges
Arvid Halln Gendered Innovations

President of The Research Council of Norway, Norway
Special Session 3 :
Conference Room, 3F @ 16:00-17:30
Science Fiction Becoming Reality - Space Resource Exploration
Tai Sik Lee
Chair President of Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology,
Republic of Korea
Panelist
Byung Chul Chang
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, Republic of Korea
Keynote David Miller Our Next Destination in the Human
Speaker NASA Chief Technologist, USA Journey Beyond Earth
Speaker
Kyeong Ja Kim Koreas Prospects and Challenges in a
Principal Researcher, KIGAM, Republic of Korea New Era of Planetary Exploration
207
DCC 1F
13
14
4 2
11
10
5
208
3 1 9
12
W
>
8
World Science & Technology Forum

Floor Plan
7
' 6
'
1 d 2 d 3 d 4 d 5 /EEKWK>/^d& 6 Z 7 / 8 />
9 Wt 10 11 12 <d 13 &Z 14 WZ
12
DCC 2F
15
17
16
DCC 3F
18
15 K 16 ^> 17 WZ 18 ^^
209
F&B
Lunch
VIP (Invited Only)
Place Crystal Ballroom, 1F, Lotte City Hotel
Time 12:30-14:00
Menu Western Food
Participants
Place Daejeon Convention Center
Time 12:30-14:00
Menu Lunch Box (Sandwich)
Lunch boxes will be provided for participants at the Track Lobby, 1F.
Hotel ICC
VIP
Lotte City
Hotel
Daejeon
Convention Center
Participants
Coffee Break
Place Track Lobby, 1F & Lobby, 3F, DCC
Time 10:30-11:00, 15:30-16:00
Menu Coffee
Cafeteria
Place Lobby, 1F, DCC
Time 08:00-18:00
Menu Donuts and Beverages (Americano, Honey Latte, Iced Tea, Juice, etc.)
210
Official Program
Opening Ceremony
Venue Grand Ballroom, 2F, DCC
Time 09:00-11:00
Official Language English and Koran
Welcome Dinner
Venue Convention Hall, 3F, Hotel ICC
Time 18:30-20:30 Shuttle bus service is provided to the hotels after the event.
Menu Korean Fusion Food
Hosted by Daejeon Metropolitan City
Location
Hotel ICC
Lotte City
Hotel
Daejeon
Convention Center
211
212
World Science &
Technology Forum
Creating Our Common Future through
Science, Technology and Innovation
213
Keynote Speaker
Founder of Foundation on Economic Trends, USA
Jeremy Rifkin is the bestselling author of twenty-one books on the

impact of scientific and technological changes on the economy,
the workforce, society, and the environment. On April 1st, 2014,
he published his latest book, The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The
Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse
Jeremy Rifkin
of Capitalism. He has been an advisor for the past 15 years to the
European Union and served as an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy
of France, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany, and others during
their respective European Council Presidencies. He is the President
of the TIR Consulting Group LLC, comprised of many of the leading
renewable energy companies, electricity transmission companies,
construction companies, architectural firms, IT and electronics
companies, and transport and logistics companies. He holds a degree in
economics from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania,
and a degree in international affairs from the Fletcher School of Law
and Diplomacy at Tufts University.
Summary
Digital Korea, the Third Industrial Revolution, and the
Zero Marginal Society
1- A new economic system is emerging on the world stagethe
Collaborative Commons. This is the first new economic system to
evolve since the onset of capitalism and socialism in the early 19th
Century and is already transforming economic life.
2- The triggering mechanism for the new economic paradigm is zero

marginal costMr. Rifkin describes the paradox at the heart of the
capitalist market that has led to its great success and now its potential
long-term demise.
214
3- The zero marginal cost phenomenon has already wreaked havoc
across the information goods sectorsthe recording industry,
entertainment, newspapers, magazines, and book publishingas
millions of consumers turned prosumers and began to produce and
share their own music, videos, news, and free e-books at near zero
marginal cost, bypassing the capitalist marketplace.
4- The zero marginal cost phenomenon is now invading the brick-and-

mortar world of physical goods and services.
5- The precipitating agent is the expanded Internet of Things (IoT), which

will allow millions of people to produce and share their own green
electricity, 3D-printed products, and other physical goods and services
at near zero marginal cost just like we have previously done with
information goods.
6- The Collaborative Commons is the new economic paradigm that

accompanies the Internet of Things infrastructure, allowing millions of
people to produce and share physical goods and services with each
otherwe are seeing a shift from exchange value in the capitalist
market to shareable value in the Collaborative Commons as a younger
generation transitions from ownership to access.
7- Airbnb and Urber are an examples of the shift to a Collaborative

Commons. Young people are not only sharing homes and apartments
at low or near zero marginal cost, but are also now sharing cars, bikes,
clothes, toys, tools, and other items at low or near zero marginal cost in
the sharing economy, undermining the already tight profit margins of
existing brick and mortar enterprises.
8- We are witnessing a new hybrid economypart capitalist market and

part Collaborative Commonsthat will transform our economic life in
the years ahead.
215
Plenary Session : Nobel Laureate's Lecture
Professor of Tumor and Vascular Biology Research

Center/Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
Aaron Ciechanover is a research professor in the Technion - Israel

Institute of Technology in Haifa. He received his M.Sc. (1971) and M.D.
(1973) from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. Then, he obtained
a doctorate in biological sciences in the Faculty of Medicine in the
Technion (D.Sc.; 1982). There, in collaboration with Dr. Irwin A. Rose
Aaron Ciechanover
from the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, USA, he discovered
that covalent attachment of ubiquitin to a target protein signals it for
degradation. As a post - doctoral fellow with Dr. Harvey Lodish at the
M.I.T., he continued his studies on the ubiquitin system. Along the years
it has become clear that ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis plays major
roles in numerous cellular processes, and aberrations in the system
underlie the pathogenetic mechanisms of many diseases, among them
certain malignancies and neurodegenerative disorders. Consequently,
the system has become an important platform for drug development.
Thanks to his remarkable achievements, he received numerous prizes
including the 2000 Albert Lasker Award, the 2003 Israel Prize, and the
2004 Nobel Prize (Chemistry; shared with Drs. Hershko and Rose).
Summary
The Personalized Medicine Revolution:
Are We Going to Cure all Diseases and at what Price?
Many important drugs such as penicillin were discovered by serendipity.
Other major drugs like the cholesterol-reducing statins were discovered
using more advanced technologies, such as screening of large chemical
libraries. In all these cases, the mechanism of action of the drug was
largely unknown at the time of their discovery and was unraveled later.
With the realization that patients with apparently similar diseases breast
or prostate cancer, for example - respond differently to similar treatments,
we have begun to understand that the molecular bases of what we
216
thought is the same disease entity, are different. Thus, breast or prostate
cancers appear to be sub-divided to smaller distinct classes according to
their molecular characteristics. As a result, we are exiting the era where
the treatment of many diseases is one size fits all, and enter a new era
of personalized medicine where the treatment is tailored according to
the patients molecular/mutational profile. Here, the understanding of
the mechanism will drive the development of new drugs. This era will be
characterized initially by the development of technologies to sequence
individual genomes, transcriptomes, proteomes and metabolomes,
followed by identification and characterization of new disease-specific
molecular markers and drug targets, and by design of novel, mechanism-
based drugs to these targets. This era will be also accompanied by
complex bioethical problems, where genetic information of large
populations will become available, and protection of privacy will become
an important issue.
Chemist, Recipient of the 2001 Nobel Prize in Chemistry,

Japan
Noyori Ryoji is Director-General of Center for Research and Development

Strategy (CRDS), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST); Director
of Science Museum, Japan Science Foundation; University Professor at
Nagoya University; and RIKEN Fellow at RIKEN. He studied chemistry at Kyoto
University and served as Instructor at the same university, Associate Professor
Noyori Ryoji
at Nagoya University, a Postdoctoral Associate at Harvard University, Professor
at Nagoya University (19722003), and President of RIKEN (20032015).
Noyori, as a scientist, is best known for his development of asymmetric

catalysis using chiral organometallic molecular catalysts. His achievement
was recognized with many prestigious awards, including the Order of
Culture, the Wolf Prize in Chemistry, and the Roger Adams Award. In 2001,
he received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry together with K. B. Sharpless and
W. S. Knowles.
217
Summary
Science and Technology Innovation for Our Survival
The real purpose of innovation in science and technology is to contribute
to the enrichment of each persons life, the security and prosperity of
nations, and the preservation of human civilization. Starting from James
Watts invention of the steam engine in the latter half of the 18th century,
the world has seen five great waves of technical transformation. These
transformations have supported the world population, which since then
has grown from one billion to 7.2 billion people, and increased the scale
of the global economy 250 fold, to the current 90 trillion US dollars. From
now, the growing Asian region will play a leading role in this continuing
growth.
However, due to the expansion of civilizations activities accompanying

the explosion in population, we are lavishly spending our resources and
borrowing without permission from our as yet unborn future generations.
As a result, CO2 emission has increased, and global temperatures have
risen 0.85 degrees Centigrade since the industrial revolution, mainly due
to the emissions of carbon dioxide.
It is quite clear that there is a limit to the extent to which progress in

science and technology can deal with the ultimate crises human society
is facing today. Nothing is more vital now than a regeneration of this
generations sense of ethics, outlook on life, and view of civilization itself.
Moreover, the overall governance of human society as a whole and the
institutional capability of decision-making systems that go beyond the
simple aggregation of government frameworks are being called into
question. Yet our systems for responding to these phenomena that exert
such broad and decisive impacts on humankind are in complete disarray.
Humans, which are biological beings, cannot survive by defying the
providence of nature, and there is no other path to survival than to fully
embrace nature and overcome these problems with our intellects and
actions.
Until now, strongly backed by the non-scientific world and the mass
media, the leaders of market economics perpetuate the myth that
economic growth will solve all problems, and have constantly
procrastinated on deciding on drastic reforms. However macroeconomic
policy that aims only at GDP growth pays scant attention to the depletion
of natural resources, which are considered an external element for
economic development, and to the social costs that put a burden on the
environment, and does not internalize these factors into the economic
system. In the 21st century, the policy which the value of natural capital
218
and the ecosystem services should be incorporated in the policy,
and immediately doing is making policy that, instead of forecasting,
backcasts from the economic boundary conditions 100 years from now.
Political inaction is nothing less than a betrayal of todays young people
and their future children.
In order to promote the kind of innovation in science and technology

we need, we must foster the human resources required for the age
and build places for them to create new value through collaboration.
From this viewpoint, the world of higher education should contribute
to foster leaders of government organizations, commerce and industry,
and nonprofit organizations who will not be lulled into crisis avoidance.
However, our current sense of ownership and responsibility for this
absolute environmental crisis is very poor and dysfunctional. As with
the fatal error in macroeconomic policy, the root of the problem in
higher education is the failure to internalize externality. The essence of
education is endowing degree earners, who will graduate to the external
environment, with the capability to adapt to society.
As with natural resources, the numbers of talented youths who are

invaluable external resources for the world of higher education are
limited. The question is whether STEM education that is being promoted
in advanced nations is really functioning effectively. The aim is not the
advancement of science and technology itself; it is social development.
For achieving this aim, more than only knowledge, it is wisdom that
is required. In fact, all over Asia now, grassroots technology utilizing IT
is being used for harmonizing terrestrial and marine ecosystems. The
assistance from advanced countries should support this development of
appropriate technology based on the different societies, cultures, and
environments of developing countries.
Although the intelligence of human beings has built a high level of

material civilization, we must reflect very deeply that national ambition
has ignited many wars and decimated societies, and that our cumulative
excessive personal appetites have brought about environmental
destruction that is already beyond repair.
Humankind must not allow itself to arrive at its own destruction through
its own foolish acts. We bear the absolute responsibility for passing on
our legacies to future generations without damaging the conditions for
survival. Scientific and technological innovation will bring the 6th wave
of technical transformation. As we approach this era of the Internet of
Things and Artificial Intelligence, I hope we will achieve this development
while conforming with the conditions for survival.
219
Session 1-1 : STI Policy and R&D
Chair
President of Korea Institute of Science & Technology

Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP), Republic of Korea
Youngah Park has been serving as the President of Korea Institute

of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) since 2013. She has been
a professor of Statistical Mechanics at the Department of Physics
at Myongji University since 1989. After completing her undergraduate
studies at Seoul National University majoring in Physics, she received
Youngah Park
her Ph.D. in Statistical Mechanics at University of Pennsylvania
in 1987. Her research areas include critical phenomena, neural
networks, soft matter, and biological physics. She has been the chair of
the Women in Physics working group of Association of the Asia Pacific
Physical Societies (AAPPS) since 2006 and chaired the local organizing
committee of the 3rd International Conference on Women in Physics
(ICWIP) in 2008.
She was a member of the National Assembly of Republic of Korea from

2008 to 2012 representing Songpa 1st district in Seoul and served as
a member of the Committee on Education, Science and Technology.
She has also been serving as a member of the Presidential Advisory
Council on Science & Technology (Creative Economy Team) since
November 2014. Her main areas of interest include role of innovation
in science and technology, education, women in science, and gender
issues.
220
Speaker
Minister of Education and Research, Norway
Torbjrn Re Isaksen has been Minister of Education and Research

in the Norwegian government since 2013. He has represented
the Conservative Party in the Storting (the Norwegian parliament)
since 2009, where he was a member of the Standing Committee on
Labour and Social Affairs before taking up the post as minister with
Torbjrn Re Isaksen
responsibility for education and research policy. He led the youth
organisation of the Conservative Party from 2004 to 2008, and was the
editor of the Norwegian conservative periodical Minerva from 2008
to 2009.
Mr. Re Isaksen has a Masters degree in political science from the

University of Oslo from 2008. His work experience outside of politics
comes from working as an editor and journalist. He has published and
edited books on conservatism and political philosophy. His latest book
was published in 2013 and discussed the role of labour, social and
educational policies in the modern welfare state.
Summary
Realising the full potential of science, technology and
innovation
In our economies and in our daily lives, we see clearly the great
returns that our efforts in research and development have produced.
We also face a great number of challenges where it is obvious that more
knowledge is required, as well as a faster pace of innovation in putting
this knowledge into use.
The full potential of science, technology and innovation cannot be

achieved by single actors working independently, but requires an
ecosystem that integrates public and private efforts and supports cross-
border cooperation. Public research plays a crucial role in this ecosystem,
and our policies must be geared towards both achieving academic
excellence and stimulating knowledge transfer and cooperation with
stakeholders in society. Research and development should not receive
221
the attention only of ministers with responsibility for science and
innovation, as it is vital to the needs of all areas of government: from
health and environment to transportation and security.
The evolving digital technologies have significantly impacted the co-

production and utilisation of knowledge. The technological development
seems, however, to move at a faster pace than the rate of change
in many academic communities and policy makers are perhaps lagging
even further behind. We need better policies to accelerate the transition
towards the scientific practices of the 21st century where the traditional
openness of science can be underpinned by modern technology.
Speaker
President of King Abdulaziz City for Science and

Technology (KACST), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Turki bin Saud is currently the President of King Abdulaziz City for
Science and Technology (KACST), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. He serves
as the chairman for various committees such as the Supervisory
Committee for the National Science, Technology and Innovation Plan
(NSTIP) of Saudi Arabia, the Supervisory Committee for the Custodian
H.H. Turki bin Saud bin
of the Two Holy Mosques Initiative for Solar Water Desalination, and
Mohammad Al Saud
the Administrative Committee of the Saudi Energy Efficiency Center.
He also chairs the Board of Directors of the Saudi Company for Technology
Development & Investment (TAQNIA) and the Board of Trustees of the
Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques Award for the Inventors and the Gifted
as well. Furthermore, he holds memberships in the Board of Directors
of Military Industries Corporation of Saudi Arabia and the Civil Defense
Council. He is also a member of the International Advisory Council (IAC)
for King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (KAPSARC). He
received his Ph.D in Aeronautics and Astronautics from Stanford University.
222
Summary
The Innovation Ecosystem of Saudi Arabia
By 2030, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is envisioned to be a knowledge
society with a prosperous, diversified, and knowledge-based economy
that is driven by private enterprises, provides high standard of living, and
leads at the regional and global levels. To achieve this vision, the Kingdom
has embarked on a twenty year National Science and Technology and
Innovation Plan that is divided into four phases. The first of these phases
was completed by the end of 2014 and was focused on establishing
the infrastructure of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) in the
Kingdom.
The second five-year phase addresses a challenging agenda for

promoting innovation in the country and developing strategic
initiatives for funding research and development that lead to successful
commercialization. This agenda requires proactive approaches to
strengthen collaboration among stakeholders including academia, R&D,
industry, government and investment entities. To accomplish these goals,
KACST is promoting the diversification of the Saudi national economy
by linking research outputs with companies in order to leap towards
industrial diversification.
223
Speaker
Deputy President of Samsung Advanced Institute of

Technology (SAIT) / Executive Vice President of Samsung
Electronics, Republic of Korea
Chilhee Chung is currently the Executive Vice President, and Deputy

President of Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT), the
corporate R&D Center for Samsung Electronics as well as Samsung
Group. He has been with Semiconductor Business at Samsung
Electronics since 1981, and has worked in various technology and
Chilhee Chung
product development areas such as DRAM, Flash Memory, and System
LSI technology. From 2010 to 2012, he worked as the General Manager
of the Semiconductor R&D Center. Especially, He led the development
of 14nm Advanced Logic, 3D Vertical NAND Flash Memory, and several
key products of Semiconductor Business. He received his BS, MS, and
PhD in Physics from Seoul National University (1979), KAIST (1981), and
Michigan State University (1993) respectively.
Summary
Technology development through open innovation and
collaborations
Most OECD member countries continue to increase expenditures
in research and development to strengthen their national competitiveness.
While the R&D investment was mostly government-led in the past,

recently the major portion of national R&D spending has come from
the private sector, as R&D has become more and more important for
business growth. For instance, the R&D investment in Korea reached
approximately 60 billion US dollars, 4.15% of the nations GDP, in 2013,
which placed the fifth largest R&D spending nation in the world, and of
which 76% came from Koreas industrial sector.
In addition, R&D paradigm of an industrial company has been shifted

as well. In the past, each company focused mainly on in-house R&D,
paying less attention to the outside collaborations . Nowadays, it is,
however, actively pursuing open innovation as well, to cope effectively
with rapid and unpredictable change of business environments.
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), which comes up with approximately
224
30% of Koreas industrial R&D investment, is also taking the similar R&D
strategy. While SEC is conducting in-house R&D projects targeting the
product development, it is actively carrying out open innovation taking
advantage of outside resources as well. For instance, SEC is taking strategic
research partnerships with global top universities for very challenging long
term researches. SEC has also established Samsung Science & Technology
Foundation in order to strengthen cooperation with domestic universities
in the basic science research.
In summary, it is a strategic R&D model for a company to focus in-

house R&D on the existing main businesses on one hand, and at the
same time to actively pursue open innovation using external resources
on the other. A lot of companies have already implemented this model,
and this trend will be strengthened.
Speaker
Former President and CEO of SRI International / Founder

and CEO of Practice of Innovation, USA
Curtis Carlson was SRI Internationals President and CEO from 1998
to 2014. SRIs revenue tripled and SRI became a global model for the
systematic creation of high-value innovations, such as HDTV, Intuitive
Surgical, Siri (now on the Apple iPhone), and other world changing
advances. He served on President Obama's National Advisory Council
Curtis Carlson
on Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Currently he serves on the US
NSFs Engineering Advisory Council and Singapores National R&D
Council. Carlson is a Tau Beta Pi physics graduate from WPI. His MS and
PhD degrees are from Rutgers University. Carlsons teams have won
two Emmys, including one for HDTV, and he has helped form over 30
companies. Carlsons new company, Practice of Innovation, works with
companies, universities, and governments to improve their innovative
performance using the concepts and processes he has pioneered and
practiced.
225
Summary
Learn Fast: Dramatically Improving Innovative
Performance
Innovation is the primary means for achieving prosperity, environmental
sustainability, social responsibility, national security, and the creation of
meaningful jobs. Fortunately this is the best time for innovation, with
endless opportunities in most market segments. However, it is also the
fastest moving and most competitive time. The inability to rapidly and
efficiently innovate usually leads to failure.
Most enterprises and governments are struggling to keep up.

Worldwide innovative performance is generally poor, whether from
start-ups, established companies, national laboratories, university tech-
transfer programs, or government-industry-university R&D initiatives.
Remarkability, the average lifetime of an S&P500 company is now below
18 years and lifetimes continue to decline.
It is often said that to succeed at innovation we must Fail fast to succeed

early. That is profoundly wrong. The objective is not to fail fast, it is to Learn
fast to succeed early. Innovation is a discipline based on fundamental
concepts from the learning sciences. It can be taught, understood, and
improved. These practices include having shared language, concepts,
frameworks, and processes that speed up learning and knowledge
creation.
Creating a new innovation is a process where information is gathered

to address an important unmet customer and market need. The goal is
to create significant, sustainable new knowledge the new innovation.
It is a process; not an event.
These fundamental innovation concepts are generally not well

understood and even less often aggressively used. For example,
new innovations must be incubated to develop a compelling value
proposition with a strong working hypothesis for both the product and
the business model. To develop these efficiently the innovation team
must have, for example, common definitions for value propositions,
customer value, and business models. In order to deeply address these
building blocks of innovation, they must be aggressively iterated within
the team and with others.
Developing an important innovation is not a two-week process; it is an

ongoing process. Experience shows that adherence to the fundamentals
of innovation dramatically improves innovative outcomes. Today few
are serious enough. Here is the test. Ask a manager to describe their
226
enterprises innovation process in detail. If they cant, there is none. I have
asked that question to senior and middle-level managers in hundreds
of global companies and in only a few cases received an informed
answer.
While I was CEO of SRI International, based on these practices, it was

transformed from a declining organization to one creating many tens
of billions of dollars of new marketplace value. When comprehensively
applied, the fundamentals of innovation are a significant competitive
advantage for a team, an enterprise, or a nation.
227
Session 1-2 : Impact Assessment of STI Investment
Chair
Jeong Dong Lee got a bachelor, master, and Ph.D. of Engineering at

Seoul National University. He is a professor of the Interdisciplinary
Graduate Program on Technology Management, Economics and Policy
(TEMEP) with the Department of Industrial Engineering in College
of Engineering at Seoul National University, Korea. He published five
Jeong Dong Lee
books and edited two including Productivity, Efficiency and Economic
Growth in the Asia-Pacific Region by Springer Verlag in 2008. He also
published more than 50 articles in peer reviewed academic journals,
such as the Economic Modelling, Industrial and Corporate Change,
Energy & Environment, Energy Economics, Energy Policy, etc. He served
as principal coordinator for the Asia-Pacific Productivity Conference
(APPC) in 2006 and as president for Korean Productivity Association
(KPA) in 2011. He was a vice dean for the Strategy and Planning
for Seoul National University in 2010-2012. He is active in providing
consultations for the government and private sectors.
228
Speaker
State Secretary for Research, Development and

Innovation, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness,
Spain
Carmen Vela is the Spanish State Secretary for Research, Development

and Innovation. Before her position in the government, Carmen
Vela was involved as a scientist and entrepreneur in the S&T private
sector in Spain, being CEO of INGENASA, a biotechnology company
that researches on animal health and food security. As a scientist
Carmen Vela Olmo
in biochemistry, immunology, virology and other related fields she has
published in internationally recognized magazines and has issued 12
patents in Europe, USA, Canada and Australia. She has been involved
in several international S&T policy advisory activities, such as advisor
of ECLAIR Agro-industrial Research Programme of the European
Commission and evaluator of the Framework Programmes among
others. Also, she is a member of the Spanish Society of Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology and has been the President of the Spanish
Society for Biotechnology.
Summary
Impact Assessment of STI Investment
Today policy makers are faced with serious challenges related to the
efficiency of STI investments and the effectiveness of the funding
strategies and instruments for achieving a stable economic and inclusive
growth and sustainable development. Mrs. Vela will evoke the need
for renewed, accurate and reliable impact assessment practices for an
up-to-date/modern STI policy design which is connected to society,
economy and open to the world as never before. Accurate informed STI
policies contrast with rhetoric about the relevance of public investments
in science, research and innovation. But current quantitative indicators
that policy designers use somehow homogeneously, exercises of
benchmarking or rankings that may result fashionable, or even successful
strategies undertaken in a country but can result in a policy failure under
different conditions. Standard indicators and conventional analysis of
science and innovation fail to discern structural causal relations among
science, the productive sector and society, and they underestimate
229
the importance on real short term impact that serves the society. Long
term and often unpredictable returns are frequently overemphasized
creating an asymmetry between research performers outcomes and
policy makers demands for effective policy design. STI policy has reached
that stage in which standard indicators do not capture any more the
increasingly open and global nature of knowledge production. Impact
assessment contributes to our common understanding of the effects
and impact of the globalization of science and how the national policies
may be effectively designed in the new global arena; this is why it is a
central pillar of STI policy design and STI investment. New types of impact
assessment exercises are needed for understanding and designing
effective funding strategies (and instruments) but also for restoring the
dialogue between STI policy makers (and society) that have hard time
understanding what scientists are doing and researchers that have hard
time providing evidence of their productivity and impact.
Speaker
Chairman of Elsevier, USA
Youngsuk YS Chi is a leader in the media-tech industry. As Chairman

of Elsevier, he works with governments, customers, and industry
associations worldwide. As head of Corporate Affairs and Asia Strategy
for RELX Group, he is responsible for government affairs, corporate
communications, and corporate responsibility for Elseviers parent
Youngsuk Chi
company. Chi recently completed four years of service as President
of the International Publishers Association and will serve as Past
President for the coming two years. Chi is based in London and New
York, but travels extensively to meet with members of scientific
research communities and governments worldwide.
Chi joined Elsevier in 2005 after serving as Chairman of Random House

Asia and President of Random House. Prior to that, he held several
President and CEO positions at Ingram Distribution Holding, the parent
230
company of Ingram Book Group, and co-founded Lightning Source,
the book industrys first ever print-on-demand and e-book distribution
company.
Summary
RIA (Research Impact Assessment) tools to shape the
future of research
People across the globe understand that investing in Science, Technology
and Innovation (STI) today promises economic growth and stability
tomorrow. But not all research is created equaland in a world where
governments and funding bodies face tight budgets and increasing
visible accountability, measuring the effects of STI investment accurately
is becoming essential. Fortunately, research impact assessment (RIA)
capabilities are quickly evolving to meet the needs of the larger scientific
community. During his talk, Dr. Chi will discuss how RIA tools are helping
to shape the future of research by guiding funders as they seek to
make the most out of finite resources. Within this discussion, Dr. Chi will
highlight the role that Elsevier has played in advancing RIA capabilities,
and the work that Elsevier is doing to advance and improve them going
forward.
231
Speaker
Director of Research and Computing, CERN, Italy
Sergio Bertolucci is an Italian physicist with a degree in physics from

the University of Pisa who has worked in experimental Particle Physics
at DESY, Fermi National Laboratory, the Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati
(LNF) of the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) and CERN.
He was Director of LNF 2002-2004, CERN LHC Committee (LHCC) Chair
Sergio Bertolucci
2004-2007, Vice President of INFN 2005-2008, and since 2009 Director
of Research and Computing at CERN.
Co-author of over 370 papers, S. Bertoluccis career includes key roles

in the KLOE and CDF experiments leading to the discovery of the top
quark, and innovative instrumentation, development and leadership
of the DAFNE accelerator.
S. Bertolucci served on DESY PRC, ESFRI, ILCSC, CERN Council Strategy

Group, SLAC, JPARC, FAIR, ETH and KEK international panels. Currently
member of CERNs Research Board and Scientific Policy Committee, and
the Restricted Panel of the European Committee for Future Accelerators
(RECFA).
232
Session 1-3 : Science Education, HRD
Chair
Vice President for Planning and Budget, KAIST

(Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology),
Republic of Korea
Seung Bin Park received B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from

Seoul National University, M.S. from KAIST (Korea Advanced Institute
of Science and Technology), and Ph.D. from Purdue University. Currently,
he is Vice President for Planning and Budget at KAIST. He has been Dean
of College of Engineering for 4 years following his 6 years
Seung Bin Park
of appointment as Head of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
department at KAIST. He also served as Vice President of Academic
Affairs for Korean Institute of Chemical Engineers. His recent research
interests cover novel processing of materials by using spray pyrolysis
and apply it to energy-related devices such as lithium batteries,
solid oxide fuel cells and biodiesel production from micro algae.
He published more than 190 peer-reviewed papers and holds
numerous patents. He received Advisor Award at Campus Patent
Strategy Universiade from Korea Patent Office and Engineering
Education Award from Korean Society for Engineering Education. He
is a senior member of National Academy of Engineering of Korea and
Chair for International Relations Committee of NAEK.
233
Vice-Chair
Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering,

Hongik University, Republic of Korea
Myongsook Oh is a professor of Chemical Engineering Department

at Hongik University in Seoul. She obtained a B.S. degree in chemical
engineering from the University of California at Berkeley, and Sc. D.
from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT ). Before joining
Hongik University, she was associated with Lawrence Livermore
Myongsook Oh
National Laboratory (LLNL) and Texaco, Inc in the U. S. Starting from her
Sc. D. thesis on softening coal pyrolysis, she worked on the conversion
of fossil fuels for over 30 years. Her current research is focused on the
gasification process, concentrating on the transformation of inorganics.
The other area that she devotes her effort is to develop women
in engineering program and educational contents. She authored
several articles on engineering education for female students as well as
research papers. Starting in March in 2012, she has headed the Women
in Science, Engineering and Technology Seoul Regional Center.
Speaker
President of Pohang University of Sci & Tech,

Republic of Korea
Doh-Yeon Kim received the B.S. degree in materials science and

engineering from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, in 1974.
Afterwards, he received the M.S. degree from the KAIST (Korea Advance
Institute of Science and Technology) in 1976, and the Ph.D. degree
from the University de Blaise-Pascal, France, in 1979. Then, he worked
Doh-Yeon Kim
as a professor in his alma mater Seoul National University up to 2008.
234
In 2005, he was appointed as a Dean of College of Engineering. After
working as the Minister of Education, Science, and Technology in
2008, he served as President of University of Ulsan until February 2011.
Then, he led the National Science & Technology Commission of the
Korean government until March 2013. Currently, he is the President
of POSTECH (Pohang University of Science & Technology). He is a fellow
member of the American Ceramic Society and also a fellow of the
School of Engineering, University of Tokyo. He was the Principal Editor
of the Journal of Master Research (2001 2007), and the President
of the National Academy of Engineering of Korea (2011).
Summary
Education for the Next Generation Leaders in Science
and Technology
When we consider the total number of people on the entire earth,
it was around 1.6 billion in the year 1900. Since then, it has been increased
explosively so that the population in the year 2000 was 6 billion. This is
predicted to be more than 9 billion in the year 2050. Such rapid increase
in population is surely related to the dramatic improvement of the
overall life condition for human being, which is the consequence of the
innovations in science and technology. Indeed, the 20th century was
a period of innovation. Engineering achievements such as electrification,
airplane, automobile and water supply etc. have transformed our life.
Now, the innovations are further accelerated and we are indeed living
in the changing society driven by science and technology.
As is well known, the best way to predict the future is to create it - Peter
Drucker. Therefore, the education for the next generation leaders is quite
important because they will create our future. Then, what will be the
most important asset for the future leaders in science and technology?
In fact, the competition has been the main driving force for the progress
of science and technology. Thus we might bring our next generation
up to be competitive and, in such situations, we used to following the
principle - the winner takes it all, the loser has to fall.
The competition is expected to become more and more severe in future.

However, we have to do our best to cultivate our young generation
to cooperate closely with each other and to care other peoples situation.
They have to open their mind to other cultures. This is particularly
important for the future leaders in science and technology, because our
future will be mainly determined by them.
235
Speaker
Head of Unit, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology

in Lausanne, Switzerland
Jan-Anders E. Mnson has his PhD from Chalmers University

of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden. Following 5 years in industry
as CTO, he was appointed professor at University of Washington,
Seattle, and later at the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
In 1990, he joined the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne
Jan-Anders E. Mnson
(EPFL), Switzerland as professor and director. Besides his research
at EPFL in new materials, he acted for a period as vice-president
at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, responsible for Innovation
and Technology Transfer. During the eight-year period he also served
as Swiss Focal Point, under the Swiss Federal Science Agency for the
cooperation with the Republic of Korea in education and science.
He is board member of the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and
member of the Swiss Academy of Engineering Sciences (SATW) and the
Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA).
Summary
Foster Talents to lead future prosperity
To foster talents to lead prosperity is on the mission-agenda of most
Universities and there are probably as many proposed strategies as there
are Universities.
There are, however, some more generic questions to be asked by the

Universities, which touch both admission processes and curriculum
strategies. In parallel the society has to question its appreciation,
promotion and support systems for our more entrepreneurial driven
youth.
Most countries have over the years seen similar evolution of their
entrepreneurial drive and success stories. In Europe we often hear
about the drive by the after-the-war entrepreneurs which created
or accelerated companies, which today are globally successful. It was
a time of tremendous demand, opportunities and markets and many
of them initially built their growth on a strong home market. Todays
236
entrepreneurs often fostered in a more academic system, operates with
ideas and technologies of higher sophistication and global reach is seen
as a must for success. Its clear the prerequisites are different.
To enter with new product or services today is challenging and require

new skills and conditions. A demand often has to be created in a highly
competitive environment. In todays market, often saturated, there
are initial fundamental questions to be asked before launching new
products/services:
- is there a use? - is it useful? - is it useable?
The ITC domain, one of the most successful players in the new economy,
is today often challenged by these questions in a market overwhelmed
by new ideas and products.
In the light of the above its clear that we cannot just expect prosperity
by trusting traditional systems when fostering our next generation
entrepreneurial talents.
In addition we have to urgently consider the fact that our Universities will
in the coming 2-3 years also start welcoming, what sometimes is referred
to as, the millennium-generation, which during their entire memory-
life been exposed to a mindboggling global connectivity, information
access and mobility-habits. Its not just their way of seeking information
and opportunities but also their habits and needs follows new paths.
If we hereto add, they look for education and knowledge in much
broader circles and national boarders becomes of less importance.
This raises overhauling questions a University needs to address when

designing curriculum and research directions for the educational
environment in which we also should have room for next generation
entrepreneurs.
Do we offer an internationally compatible learning experience?

Is the learning experience sufficiently broad to comprehend new
demands and opportunities in a fast changing global context?
How reactive and flexible will their learning capability be?
What learning methods and tools will be most efficient and flexible?
Who have the rights to ideas and innovations?
Will they be open-minded global citizens with the right value-base?
How to position the universities in the innovation landscape? There are

no doubt universities today plays an important role in the innovation
landscape of a country and a region. We often measure in blunt number
237
as patents, start-ups etc. but the actual outcome for the society in new
jobs and business opportunities are sometimes difficult to measure.
Research with more applied orientation has undoubtedly easier to fast

connect their research to an industrial implementation phase. However,
its important to consider the timescale for ideas to reach market.
Therefore, an innovation policy should also stimulate efforts in more
fundamental domains where the timeline might be longer and the
outcome initially less obvious, but the groundbreaking impact might be
considerably larger.
By tradition innovation efforts have been focused around products,

devices and processes. The dimension of innovation in the more service-
oriented industries is often less promoted. In this direction the less
technology-oriented faculties has opportunity to be more included
in the entrepreneurial efforts. Thus, a broad comprehensive educational
structure will be essential for insight to all angles of successful innovation.
The innovation and tech-transfer efforts at a university need a structure

that is easily accessible and supportive for faculties and students.
In addition, a customer friendly interface to the industry is of crucial
importance. This is not just for the large global companies, but more
so, for the smaller regional companies. They are today often in a tough
international competition and access to the university competences is
vital in order to gain additional competitiveness.
The presentation will bring up different way of addressing these

challenges when fostering next generation talents to lead global
prosperity.
238
Speaker
President and CEO, Wiley, USA
Mark Allin is an industry leader and entrepreneur in the higher education,

e-learning and research sectors. He currently serves as CEO of John Wiley
& Sons (Wiley), a global provider of knowledge and knowledge-enabled
services that improve outcomes in research, professional practice, and
education. Wiley is the worlds largest publisher on behalf of non-profit
Mark Allin
scholarly societies - who collectively represent 14 million scientists and
professionals - and has published the works of over 450 Nobel Laureates. Wiley
is proud to promote the achievements of young scientists and researchers,
including as co-sponsor of the APEC Science Prize for Innovation, Research
and Education (ASPIRE), which is awarded annually to a young scientist
in the Asia-Pacific region. Mr. Allin previously served as COO of Wiley, head of
Wiley's Professional Development business and Vice President and Managing
Director, Wiley Asia. A successful entrepreneur, Mr. Allin co-founded the business
publisher Capstone Publishing in 1996, which was acquired by Wiley in 2000.
Summary
Protecting the Innovation Pipeline: Reskilling of the
Research Workforce
Continued investment in R&D is critical to maintain and grow a nations
economic strength. However, R&D is not an instrument that can be
quickly turned on and off to trigger growth. Countless countries and
regions have set long-term R&D goals that have not been realized.
Ensuring that the research workforce is equipped with the necessary
skills will ensure we maximize return on investment with new, faster, life-
changing innovations in basic and applied research. To address this talent
gap requires refocusing education and training around competencies
and outcomes and bringing together higher education institutions,
corporations, students, researchers and science organizations in
a systematic way.
Mark Allin will share insights about this new education paradigm,
including case studies and lessons learned for OECD member economies.
239
Speaker
President of Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand
Worsak Kanok-Nukulchai received his B. Eng. from Chulalongkorn

University in 1971, M. Eng. from Asian Institute of Technology in 1973,
and Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley in 1978 under
Fulbright Scholarship. He joined Asian Institute of Technology in 1979,
Bangkok-based international post-graduate institute, where he has
Worsak Kanok
served as Assistant, Associate and Full Professor, Former Dean of School
-Nukulchai
of Civil Engineering (SCE), Founding Dean of School of Engineering and
Technology (SET), Vice President for Resource Development and currently
President of AIT. He has extensive research experiences in Computational
Mechanics for the last 30 years and has published more than 240 papers.
In 2006, he was awarded the IACM Fellows Award from the International
Association of Computational Mechanics and the First Fumio Nishino
Medal in 2008. Prof Worsak was a member of the Royal Institute
of Thailand, and recognized as National Researcher of Thailand in 1999.
Summary
Internationalization of Multidisciplinary Education and
Research
Collaboration and sharing are the new buzzwords in the international
arena, and the field of education and research is not immune to these
developments. The critical missing link in collaboration and sharing is the
absence of a host which can act as a neutral platform for such endeavors.
Need for a multidisciplinary and cross-country platform
Issues that confront humanity have cross border dimensions, and they
need to be tackled at a regional level. For examples, climate change does
not restrict itself to one country, and neither do natural disasters like
earthquakes and tsunamis. Energy and food are global issues that require
a multidisciplinary approach. If there is flood in one country and drought
in another, the root cause of these two events may be related. Often,
scholars and researchers are holed up in one place, with limited linkages,
and they are unable to decode and decipher such developments.
240
Currently, regional collaborations have been largely confined to a case-
by-case basis driven by funding agencies and market economy. Asian
Institute of Technology (AIT), an autonomous international post-graduate
institute based in Thailand, has managed to tide over this issue, by
keeping its entire academics and research focus cutting across countries
and disciplines.
Research for Mankind and Research for Economic Gain
Research needs to be relevant to the needs of the region. We need

a neutral platform to adapt the best of global technology, but tailor it
according to the requirements of our people in the region. This is what
AIT has strived for almost six decades. Generation of knowledge should
not be locked in journals and remain confined to the portals of one
university. This needs to be transferred rapidly to make it usable. For this,
a regional hub is required that makes outreach and dispersal of
knowledge easier and more beneficial.
On the other hand, the realities of market economy need to be taken into
account. Recent development of a market economy in higher education
has resulted in the need to tailor the product to the customers, namely
students, employers and commissioning bodies.
So, there is a need to strike a balance between knowledge dispersal,

capacity building and market needs, something that government
institutions or private universities find difficult to do. And this has to be
sustainable. Such a balance has been perfected by an independent
international regional institute like AIT.
Over the past decades, AIT has identified eight important clusters
for international cooperation in education and research - Water,
Infrastructure, Development, Environment, Industry, ICT, Energy and
Food. These clusters or themes co-opt experts from all over the world so
that they can work in an Asian context.
Regional Neutral Platform
Science is value neutral and it requires both a neutral atmosphere as well

as a neutral institute to act as a pivot. Often institutions in an attempt
to become neutral lose their own individuality and become increasingly
slow and bureaucratic. AIT has managed to walk this tightrope, since we
have always looked at education, research and capacity-building from
an international perspective, which is not bound by any barriers.
AIT has hosted numerous international platforms and incubated their

growth. For over four decades, AIT hosted Asian Disaster Preparedness
Center (ADPC) and UNEPs Regional Resource Centre for the Asia and
241
the Pacific. Immediately after the tsunami, the Regional Integrated Multi-
Hazard Early Warning System for Africa and Asia (RIMES) was established
at AIT. AIT also hosted the Asia office of Telecoms Sans Frontieres, and the
global secretariat of the International Partnership for Expanding Waste
Management Services of Local Authorities (IPLA).
Roles of the Regional Platform
Provide a neutral platform for international scholars to share their

experiences and learn from one another for the interest of the region,
Take the lead in initiation and strengthening of R&D at locations where
the effects of greatest usefulness can be expected,
Conducts regular monitoring and taking lead in regulations and
technical standardization of the region, and
Provides support of prototype production and on-the-spot incubation
by regional R&D capacities.
Conclusion
Internationalization of multidisciplinary research and education with

regional perspective is the need of the hour. Seven factors are critical
international orientation, Asian perspective, multidisciplinary approach,
cross national solutions, relevant research, knowledge dispersal in
a market economy, and neutrality.
242
OECD SG Special Session
(Innovation for Growth and Society : OECD Insights from the Innovation
Strategy and the Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015)
Speaker
OECD Secretary-General, Mexico
Angel Gurra is the Secretary-General of the OECD since June 2006. He

was re-appointed to a second mandate in September 2010. As OECD
Secretary-General, he has reinforced the OECD's role as a 'hub' for
global dialogue and debate on economic policy issues while pursuing
internal modernization and reform. Mr. Gurra is a Mexican national and
Angel Gurra
came to the OECD following a distinguished career in public service
in his country, including positions as Minister of Foreign Affairs and
Minister of Finance and Public Credit in the 1990s. Mr. Gurra holds a
B.A. degree in Economics from UNAM (Mexico) and a M.A. degree in
Economics from Leeds University (United Kingdom). He is married and
has three children.
Summary
Innovation for Growth and Society: OECD insights from
the Innovation Strategy and the Science, Technology
and Industry Scoreboard 2015
Innovation is a key driver of productivity, growth and wellbeing, and plays
an important role in helping address core public policy challenges like
health, food security, education and public sector efficiency. Moreover,
innovation-led productivity growth will become more important for
growth in the future, as populations age, and will be critical in addressing
climate change. However, policy makers can do better in marshalling
the power of innovation to help achieve core objectives of public policy.
Strong leadership at the highest political levels will be essential.
Angel Gurra, Secretary General of the OECD and Andrew Wyckoff,

Director of Science, Technology and Innovation will launch on 19
243
October 2015 the OECD report: "Science, Technology and Industry
Scoreboard: Innovation for Growth and Society 2015" (http://www.oecd.
org/sti/scoreboard.htm) and provide policy insights from "The Innovation
Imperative. Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-being" released
on 14 October 2015 (http://oe.cd/innovation).
There is no single silver bullet to strengthen innovation and policy

makers will require a mix of policies for innovation that go beyond
traditional policies in a narrow sense. The precise mix will depend on the
national and institutional context of each country, the level of economic
and social development, and the prevailing barriers to innovation. Angel
Gurra will intervene on key areas for action that will help governments in
fostering more innovative, productive and prosperous societies, increase
well-being, and strengthen the global economy in the process.
The OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2015, shows

how science and innovation are changing and being reshaped by the
forces of globalisation and digitalisation. It reveals how ready a country is
for the future - based on its investments in the knowledge infrastructure
like broadband, human capital and the research system; on the extent of
knowledge diffusion; the degree to which businesses innovate and the
context in which they operate; on countries' competitive strengths in the
global economy and the use of technology in society. Andrew Wyckoff
will present key findings from the STI Scoreboard 2015. The report is
under embargo until 15:40 on 19 October 2015.
Finally, since its creation in 1962, the OECD has worked to build global
data infrastructures to inform STI policy-making. On 19 October 2015,
more than 50 years since the first edition, the OECD is launching the
7th edition of the Frascati Manual, the OECD global standard on the
measurement of R&D. This Manual, the most translated and popular of
all OECD standards, is more than a tool for statisticians worldwide. Its
guidelines are referred to in tax policy, trade agreements and competition
rules. And it is a clear example of OECD work to inform discussions for
better policies through better, robust and internationally comparable
evidence. (http://oe.cd/frascati).
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

(OECD) provides a forum in which governments can work together to
share experiences and seek solutions to common problems. We work
with governments to understand what drives economic, social and
environmental change. We measure productivity and global flows of
trade and investment. We analyse and compare data to predict future
trends. We set international standards on a wide range of things, from
244
agriculture and tax to the safety of chemicals. (http://www.oecd.org/)
The OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Innovation (DSTI)

develops evidence-based policy advice on the contribution of science,
technology and innovation to economic growth and well-being. We work
on: (1) new sources of growth and business practices, delivering cutting-
edge empirical analysis on the drivers of productivity, the changing
nature of international trade, the evolution of the digital economy and
the new dynamics of innovation; (2) shared experiences from countries
that are confronting issues at the forefront of STI or are trying to draw
greater benefits from their investments in STI; and (3) international
policy guidance and recommendations in emerging areas ranging from
Internet policy-making, electronic commerce, science and technology or
consumer policy, to statistical norms for measuring R&D, innovation and
the digital economy. (http://www.oecd.org/sti)
245
Speaker
Director of the OECDs Directorate for Science,

Technology and Innovation (STI), USA
Andrew W. Wyckoff is the Director of the OECDs Directorate for Science,

Technology and Innovation (STI) where he oversees OECDs work on
innovation, business dynamics, science and technology, information
and communication technology policy as well as the statistical work
associated with each of these areas.
Andrew W. Wyckoff
Mr. Wyckoff was previously Head of the Information, Computer and
Communications Policy (ICCP) division at the OECD which supports the
organisations work on information society as well as consumer policy
issues. Before heading ICCP, he was the head of STIs Economic Analysis
and Statistics Division which develops methodological guidelines,
collects statistics and undertakes empirical analysis in support of
science, technology and innovation policy analysis.
He has served on various advisory groups and panels which currently

include co-chairing the US National Academies panel on Developing
Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators for the Future, being
a member of the Research Advisory Network for the Global Commission
on Internet Governance and being a named to the Malaysian Prime
Ministers Global Science and Innovation Advisory Council.
His experience prior to the OECD includes being the Program Manager
of the Information Technology and Commerce Program at the US
Congressional Office of Technology Assessment (OTA), the US National
Science Foundation (NSF) and The Brookings Institution.
Mr. Wyckoff is a citizen of the United States, holds a BA in Economics

from the University of Vermont, and a Master of Public Policy from the
JFK School of Government, Harvard University.
246
Session 2-1 : Toward Personalized & Precision Medicine
Chair
General Director of KRIBB Ochang Branch Institute,

Republic of Korea
Young Il Yeom received a master of science degree in biological

sciences (Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology), and
a Ph.D degree in molecular genetics (University of Texas at Austin, USA).
He had a postdoctoral experience in Gene Expression Program at EMBL
(European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany) and has worked
Young Il Yeom
as principal Investigator in the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience
& Biotechnology (KRIBB). He also serves Professor of Korea University
of Science & Technology as representative professor of the KRIBB
Campus. He has been the leader of over 10 government-funded
research projects. His areas of research interest include (1) genomic
analysis of cancers and identification of therapeutic targets, (2) cancer
gene therapy, and (3) analysis of gene function in health and diseases.
247
Speaker
University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical

Center, Republic of Korea
Jung-Shin Lee is a board certified medical oncologist and a Professor

of Oncology in Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College
of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. He obtained his undergraduate and MD
degrees from Seoul National University in 1976. He completed an
internship in Maryland University Hospital, residency in internal
Jung-Shin Lee
medicine at Georgetown University Hospital, followed by medical
oncology fellowship in the Department of Medical Oncology at MD
Anderson Cancer Center and at Fox Chase Cancer Center.
Dr. Lee served as the Vice President from 2003 to 2008 and as the
President & Chief Executive Officer of Asan Medical Center from 2009
to 2010. He is also the founding President of Institute for Innovative
Cancer Research (IICR) of Asan Medical Center, the first to be designated
as the Governments research partner for development and accelerated
commercialization of anti-cancer therapeutics in Korea. He directed IICR
by developing innovative research platforms of targeted therapeutics,
biomarker & imaging, targeted delivery and diagnosis. In addition to
his clinical and research duties at Asan Medical Center, he remains an
active advocate as a Chairman of Health Technology Forum, a member
of Health Technology R&D Strategic Planning, and an Advisory Board
Member of Health Care Policy, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea.
Summary
Future Medicine: Healthy Aging and Perfect Medicine
Korea is alrealy one of the top aging society, hyper-aging society. The
rapidply aging population, coupled with the lowest birth rate in the world, is
posing a lot of socieecomnimc problems, including shortage of labor force,
sluggishness of economic growth and increment of welfare cost, which
cause or have already caused various nation-wide strains. However, the
problems of aging society owing to advance of health care and technology
can be pradoxocially solved by a new and cutting edge health care and
technology, which can help us prepare the healthy aging society.
248
Physiological changes occur in the elderly as a natural part of aging, and
can affect their health and lifestyle. Actually most conditions in the elderly
result from decreased function of degeneration of the involved organ.
Augmentation technology, Replacement and Regenration Technology
and Biogerontology technology can augment and enforce the decreased
functions, replace the ill-functioned or malfunctioned organs, and finally
prevent the aging process. Research and development of this kind of
new technologies, if possible, with convergence with other technologies
will become a new engine of economy and society.
To live longer than before has changed the patterns of disease from
acute disease to chronic disorder, such as cancer or cardiovascular
or metabnolic disorder. Fortunately, owing to advance of medicine
and biology, these kinds of the chronic disease occur after genetic
aberration or change and can be categorized by its own genetic change.
In addition, the knowledge of genomics as well as development of
pharmaceutical industry make us have a new more effective and
less toxic therapeutics from precision medicine we will give a patient
personalized medicine, which not only targets patients disease but
also reflect on the patients characterstics itself. On the other hand,
we have known that many diseases are mulfifactorial genetic disorder
and affected by environmental factors, meaning that we can screen
some disease and identifiy the susceptibility, or predicitive medicine,
and accordingly we can prevent the disease or delay the occurrence, or
preventive medicine. We can encourage patients to actively participate
into health care program or treatment and monitoring plan, which is
active participatory medicine. P4 health care, predicitive preventive
personalized and participatory medicine, requires many platforms such
as information and communication technology to capture and interpret
big health information data. It is the first step toward Perfect Medicine.
In summary, future medicine includes new and cutting-edge health

technology and platforms for P4 medicine and finally perfect medicine.
We have to develop structured, stratified, and relevant approaches for
P4 health care, which is to prepare healthy aging society and future
medicine.
249
Speaker
Founding President of KBRI/President of Neuroscience

Research Institute at Gachon University, Republic of Korea
Yoo-Hun Suh is a president of Neuroscience Research Institute at

Gachon University and a professor emeritus of College of Medicine at
Seoul National University. He was the founding president of Korea Brain
Research Institute and won various the National Government Medal.
He obtained M.D. and Ph.D. in Medicine and Pharmacology from the
Yoo-Hun Suh
College of Medicine at the Seoul National University. He is an editor for
6 SCI journals. He first cloned the gene for epinephrine synthesizing
enzyme, PNMT and has greatly contributed to the discovery of a new
potential gene and factors for AD, and the development of potential
drugs and stem cell therapy for AD and PD. Currently, he serves various
organizations such as a member of Korean National Academy of
Science and Technology and Korean National Academy of Medicine.
Also, he served as president for the Korea Brain Association and the
Korean Society for Brain and Neural Science.
Summary
A Personalized Stem Cell Treatment for Alzheimers and
Parkinsons Disease
Alzheimers disease (AD) is characterized by the accumulation
of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles accompanied by cognitive
dysfunction.
Parkinsons disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder

of unknown etiology. PD is caused by the progressive degeneration
of dopaminergic neurons and is characterized by cytoplasmic inclusions
known as lewy bodies in the substantia nigra.
Recent studies of stem cell show its therapeutic potential for neuro
degenerative disorders by differentiating into other cell lineages and
replacing damaged cells. Among stem cells, autologous human adipose-
derived stem cells (hASCs) elicit no immune rejection responses,
tumorigenesis, or ethical problems and might be one of the most
promising personalized therapy for AD and PD in the future.
250
Here, we used autologous human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs)
and examined whether intravenously or intracerebrally transplanted
hASCs could have therapeutic and preventive effects in Tg2576 mice.
We first report that intravenously or intracerebrally transplanted hASCs
significantly rescues memory deficit and neuropathology in the brains of
Tg mice. More importantly, our findings that transplanted hASCs prevent
or delay the onset and progression of the disease strongly suggest that
the simple, personalized, convenient and safe intravenous injection of
hASCs can be very useful in both the prevention and treatment of AD.
The treatment of Parkinsons disease (PD) using stem cells has long been
the focus of many researchers, but the ideal therapeutic strategy has not
yet been developed.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the preventive and
therapeutic potential of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASC) for
PD and was to identify the related factors to this therapeutic effect.
The hASC were intravenously injected into the tail vein of a PD mouse
model induced by 6-hydrozydopamine (6-OHDA). Consequently, the
behavioral performances were significantly improved at 3 weeks after
the injection of hASC. Additionally, dopaminergic neuros were rescued,
the number of structure-modified mitochondria was decreased, and
mitochondrial complex I activity was restored in the brains of the
hASC-injected PD mouse model. Overall, this study underscores that
intravenously transplanted personalized hASC may have therapeutic
potential for PD by recovering mitochondrial functions.
251
Speaker
Chief Scientist of National Cancer Center, Republic of Korea
Jin Soo Lee is a chief scientist of Research Institute of National Cancer

Center and adjunct professor of the MD Anderson Cancer Center,
Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Houston,
Texas. He was 4th and 5th President of National Cancer Center Korea
from 2008 to 2014. He earned his MD from Seoul National University,
Jin Soo Lee
Korea, and completed residency training in Internal Medicine
in Chicago, Illinois and medical oncology fellowship at MD Anderson
Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. His current research interests include
treatment of lung cancer with novel targeted agents and combined
treatment modalities. He is a member of a number of professional
societies including the American Society of Clinical Oncology,
the American Association for Cancer Research and the American
College of Physicians. He was the congress president for the 12th World
Conference on Lung Cancer held in Seoul, Korea in 2007.
Summary
Precision Medicine-based Personalized Cancer Therapy
Over the past half century, weve witnessed great progress and success in
basic science and technology that changed our daily life in many aspects
and revolutionized medical practice as well. We are living in a post-
genome era that brought us more closer to curing cancer by treating
an individuals cancer based on specific abnormalities of that persons
tumor. The best example is development of a bcr-Abl kinase inhibitor
imatinib (Glivec) that targets the true tumor-specific bcr-Abl gene
alteration found in chronic myeloid leukemia.
In January this year, the USA President Barack Obama announced a bold
research initiative that aims to accelerate progress toward a new era of
precision medicine. The concept of precision medicine, i.e., prevention
and treatment approach that takes into account individual variations
in genes, environment, and lifestyle, is not new. But the prospect of
applying this concept broadly has been dramatically enhanced by the
improved technologies for biomedical analysis (such as the human
252
genome sequence), and new computational tools for analyzing large-
scale biologic databases.
One of two main components of the precision medicine initiative was

cancer, which has clear choice for enhancing the near-term impact
of precision medicine. With increasing use of drugs and antibodies
designed to counter the influence of specific molecular drivers in cancer
cells, dramatic clinical responses were reported with survival benefits,
which changed the standard of care in many patients with specific
molecular markers. In addition, novel immunologic approaches blocking
the checkpoint pathway have recently produced profound responses in
some patients with certain molecular signatures.
What is needed to move the concept of precision medicine into clinical

practice is innovative clinical trials, which I would call evidence-building
medical practice. Over the last decade, for example, the discovery of new
drugs targeting activating EGFR mutations has dramatically improved
the survival of NSCLC patients who had specific mutations in their
tumor. However, early phase III trials, which were designed before the
discovery of EGFR mutations, showed that concurrent administration
of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and systemic chemotherapy did
not improve the patients survival compared with chemotherapy alone.
In a randomized phase 2 study, First-line Asian Sequential Tarceva And
Chemotherapy Trial (FASTACT), we showed significant improvement
in progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]-0.47, 95% CI 0.330.68;
p=0.0002). This phase II finding was further confirmed in a subsequent
phase III trial (FASTACT-2).
Precision medicine, however, does not replace the successful staples of

oncology, such as prevention, diagnostics, some screening methods, and
effective treatments. In Korea, the first 10-year National Cancer Control
Program was launched in 1996 and the National Cancer Center Korea
was founded in 2000. Over the last 2 decades, the overall 5-year survival
rate for all cancer patients has improved by about 2% point per year (from
41.2% in 93-95 period to 68.1% in 08~12 period). When compared with
USA and other countries, the overall 5-year survival rates and the 5-year
survival rates for major tumor sites such as stomach, colon, liver, uterine
cervix compared favorably, with only exception of prostate cancer which
is better in the USA. According to the International Agency for Research
on Cancer, Korea has the highest 5-year survival rate for colorectal cancer
and uterine cervix cancer among the OECD countries. Further efforts
are to be directed to distribute the fruits of precision medicine to the
individual patients with an applicable target.
253
Session 2-2 : Next Generation Energy R&D Strategy
Chair
President of Green Technology Center, Republic of Korea
Changmo Sung is the president of GTC (Green Technology Center) since

2012. GTC is a government-affiliated research institution under Ministry
of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) to coordinate and advise
green technology policies and aims to be the main gateway of Korea
for global green technology cooperation related to climate change
Changmo Sung
issues. He was the president of Hyosung Corporation, responsible
for its R&D Business Institute. Prior to that, he was the president of
Inje University in Koreas Gyungnam Province. He has also served on
Koreas Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development, the
Presidential Commission on Policy Planning, and National Committee
of Innovation Science Technology. He was involved in planning and
execution of Korean high technology clusters and commercialization
for advanced regional economic development. He was also a tenured
professor at University of Massachusetts, Lowell, where he worked as
associate director in the NSF Nanomanufacturing Center. He received
his Ph.D. from Lehigh University, USA, MS degrees from Ohio State
University and Seoul National University, and BS degree from Seoul
National University, Korea in the materials engineering field.
254
Speaker
Associate Director for Energy Systems Integration at

the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), USA
Bryan Hannegan is the associate director for Energy Systems Integration at

the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, the U.S. Department of Energys
primary national laboratory for energy efficiency and renewable energy
research and development. In this role, he leads NRELs global initiative to
optimize links between electricity, fuel, thermal, water, and communication
Bryan Hannegan
networks in order to enable a more sustainable society. Prior to joining NREL,
he held several research leadership positions in fossil energy, renewable
energy, and environmental science and technology at the Electric Power
Research Institute, the non-profit R&D arm of the electric power industry.
He is a former elected Director of the Coastside County Water District,
and he serves on numerous professional societies and commissions,
including the California Council on Science and Technology, the American
Meteorological Societys Board on Global Strategies, and the International
Energy Agencys Renewable Energy Industry Advisory Board.
Summary
The Global Imperative for Grid Modernization
The emergence of cleaner energy technologies such as wind and
solar generation, electric vehicles, and smart buildings places new and
additional stress on existing power grids. To achieve a future which is
reliable, affordable, and clean, new research and innovation must enable
a smarter grid which is more flexible and capable of handling variability
in both demand and supply. The U.S. Department of Energy and its
national laboratories have proposed a new Grid Modernization Initiative
which will address these many challenges, working with private industry
and academic organizations. This presentation will outline the new US
DOE initiative and highlight areas for potential global collaboration.
255
Speaker
Director of Jlich Research Center, Germany
Detlef Stolten is the director of the Institute of Electrochemical Process

Engineering (IEK-3) at the Jlich Research Center in Germany and holds
the chair for fuel cells at the RWTH Aachen University.
His research is focused on different types of fuel cells from

Detlef Stolten electrochemistry to systems including energy systems analysis. He
is the chairman of the Executive Committee of the Implementing
Agreement Advanced Fuel Cells of the International Energy Agency and
vice president for Europe of the International Association of Hydrogen
Energy. Also, he holds membership in the Steering Committee of the
Society Process and Chemical Engineering of the Association of German
Engineers and the Supervisory Board of the Wuppertal Institute for
Climate, Environment and Energy. He is a subject editor of the Journal
Applied Energy and edited four books dealing with hydrogen and fuel
cells, carbon capture, fuel cell science and engineering as well as on the
transition to renewable energy systems.
Summary
Hydrogen as an Enabler for a Cleaner World
An overwhelmingly renewable energy supply entails overcapacity
in installed power and hence entails excess power
80% of CO2 reduction requires interconnection of the energy sectors
- Hydrogen as fuel for automotives
- Hydrogenation steps in liquid fuel production from biomass and CO2
Conversion of excess power to hydrogen and storage thereof is
feasible on the scale needed (TWh)
Over long distances mass transportation of gas is more effective than
that of electricity
Fuel cell vehicles are being introduced to the market by Asian
automakers
Hydrogen as an automotive fuel is cost effective other than feed-in
to the gas grid or reconversion to electricity
256
Speaker
Distinguished Professor, KAIST (Korea Advanced

Institute of Science and Technology), Republic of Korea
Sang Yup Lee received B.S. and Ph.D. in chemical engineering from
Seoul National University and Northwestern University, respectively.
Currently, he is distinguished professor at the Department of Chemical
and Biomolecular Engineering at the Korea Advanced Institute
of Science and Technology, and also Director of Center for Systems
Sang Yup Lee
and Synthetic Biotechnology, BioProcess Engineering Research Center,
and Bioinformatics Research Center at KAIST. He is a scientific advisory
board member of Joint BioEnergy Institute and Genomatica in USA.
He received many awards, including the National Order of Merit,
Citation Classic Award, Elmer Gaden Award, Merck Metabolic
Engineering Award, ACS Marvin Johnson Award, SIMB Charles Thom
Award, POSCO TJ Park Prize, Amgen Biochemical Engineering Award,
and HoAm Prize in Engineering among many others. He has served as
the chairman of the Global Agenda Council on Emerging Technologies
and Global Agenda Council on Biotechnology. He is currently a member
of the Presidential Advisory Committee on Science and Technology.
Summary
Biorefineries for energy, chemicals and materials
As our concerns on global warming and other environmental problems
are increasing, there has been much interest in developing sustainable
system for the production of energy, chemicals, and materials from
renewable resources. Biotechnology can be a key technology to achieve
this. Using renewable non-food biomass as a raw material, ethically
sound microorganisms can be employed for the production of various
chemicals and materials. As microorganisms isolated from nature are
often inefficient in performing the desired task, rational metabolic
engineering of microorganisms has been employed for the improvement
of microbial performance. There has recently been a paradigm shift
in biological and biotechnological research on microorganisms
as systems biology and synthetic biology are playing increasingly
important roles in deciphering and redesigning the cell. Here I will
257
present the general strategies for systems metabolic engineering, which
combines metabolic engineering with systems biology, synthetic biology
and evolutionary engineering for more system-wide optimization of
metabolic performance. Such strategies will be accompanied by several
examples including production of energy, chemicals and materials.
First, production of liquid biofuels such as four carbon alcohol, butanol,

and non-natural product gasoline will be reported with focus on how
microorgnisms are engineered. Next, various platform chemicals that are
important for manufacturing plastics and polymers will be showcased.
Metabolic pathway design and construction of microbial strains
overproducing various chemicals will be reported. Finally, production
of various polymers will be reported.
It is expected that biorefineries will become an essential platform

for making us move toward sustainable bio-based chemical industry
in the near future.
258
Session 2-3 : Big Data & IoT
Chair
Professor at Sungkyunkwan University,

Republic of Korea
Yoon-Deock Lee is currently responsible for the project for commercializing

technologies that would be chosen among research projects of MSIP
(Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning). He is a professor of the
College of Information & Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan
University, and has also been the head of the steering committee of IoT
Yoon-Deock Lee
Forum since December 2009. He graduated from Seoul National University
and received a masters degree in computer science from Yonsei University.
He was a commissioner of the Korea Communication Standard Commission
for 3 years. He worked for the Ministry of Information and Communication
as a project manager for government-funded research programs. He also
worked for Samsung Electronics as a researcher for almost 20 years.
259
Speaker
General Manager of IBM Korea, USA
Jeffery A. Rhoda is currently the General Manager of IBM Korea.

Previously, he was the general manager of IBMs government industry
worldwide responsible for industry performance, strategy and strategic
partnerships. As a member of IBMs Growth Markets Unit, Jeff was vice
president of public sector sales for the Growth Markets Unit. He also
Jeffrey A. Rhoda
led IBMs initiatives in supporting economic stimulus and Smarter
Cities programs in these countries. He has spent more than 30 years in
the technology industry with IBM in areas including sales, marketing,
channels, and ibm.com. In addition, Jeff led the Sales Eminence
initiative across the 147 countries focused on continued development
of a professional sales force with skills valued in the marketplace and by
IBM clients. He holds a BS degree from the Robert H. Smith School of
Business at the University of Maryland, College Park.
Summary
Big data, A new path for value
Data is the worlds newest resource for competitive advantage. A resource
that is fueled by the proliferation of devices and the infusion of technology
in all things and processes, data is fundamentally changing the world,
business and enterprises. It enables to create new value and to solve
previously unsolvable problems. Leading organizations take advantage
of new best practices of harnessing data, transforming their industries
and profession with speed and conviction. With the cases of how the real-
world is using big data, you can learn how to realize the value from data
and analytics and fundamentally change the way organizations engage
with their customers or citizens, inspire new business model and outpace
the competition. Explosion of data and advances in technology are
ushering into new era of cognitive computing.
260
Speaker
Director of Digital Transformation and IoE Acceleration

at Cisco Systems (USA) Pte Ltd., Australia
As the Director for Digital Transformation & IOE Acceleration, Rajiv

oversees the strategy, development, go-to-market of Internet
of Everything (IOE) solutions for vertical markets. In his current role,
he has been responsible for overseeing Cisco's investments in IOE
and developing an eco-system of partnerships to drive new solutions
Rajiv Niles
in industry segments which include Smart Cities, Manufacturing,
Energy and Transportation. As an 18-year veteran in the IT industry,
he has played a pivotal role in developing Ciscos innovation center
strategy and new paradigms for innovating at the edge in order to
accelerate capabilities around IOE. He earned a bachelor's degree in
electronic engineering from the University of Western Australia. He is
a Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert (CCIE) and Certified Enterprise
Architect.
Summary
The Internet of Everything
Introduction
Im here today to connect with you about the future of the Internet.
The opportunities that new and more valuable connections will make
possible. And, how we can help you solve the challenges ahead and help
you succeed. The opportunities that new and more valuable connections
will make possible. And, how we can help you solve the challenges ahead
and help you succeed.
Presentation Synopsis
Cisco was the first company to articulate the value at stake and provide
customers the how in terms of how to capitalize on it. Initially the
value at stake looked for its potential to unlock profitability, now
the value at stake speaks to survivability of organizations in dynamic
economic conditions we have come to expect. We have the ability
to assist customers to through our consulting practice to assess, plan and
implement optimizations to improve their profitability.
261
Taking an industry perspective, we will explore perspectives from the
industry on the Internet of Everything. This will include the examples
of how the Internet of Everything has been leveraged by various
businesses to increase their competitiveness, gain insights and optimize
their supply chain. We will explore how this new level of connectedness,
bring new opportunities. We will also explore the threats and the risks
we need to mitigate.
We will then focus our discussion on the specifics of the Internet

of Everything. What is it exactly? What ere the key elements? What
industry transitions will they give rise to?
Finally, I will talk about how Cisco is leading the transition in the Internet
of Everything. Some of the concepts we will discuss in this final section
will include:
Our work in specific domains including Smart Cities, Manufacturing,

Transportation and Utilities and how we are unlocking new potential
for our customers in those segments.
Through Cisco FOG computing, we can now process large volumes

of data closest to where it is being generated, operate online / offline
and make actuation decisions at high speed without having to send
everything back to a central data center for actuation decisions.
Cisco has operationalized Eight IOE Innovation Centers Worldwide

to foster innovation and support growth in the local economies they
represent. We will briefly talk about the innovation work being done
from our IOE innovation in Songdo, Korea.
How to secure your IOE deployments. Our extensive experience

in device security being extended through our work in hardware roots
of trusts, advanced device management and other developments
place will help us mitigate the dramatically increasing number of attack
vectors that are coming online with IOE deployments.
Amazing things happen when you connect the unconnected!
262
Speaker
SVP of Corporate R&D Center, SK Telecom, USA
Kang-Won Lee is senior vice president of Corporate R&D Center

at SK Telecom. He is directing technology development in the areas
of potential synergy between Information and Communications
Technologies. Specific areas of focus are Software-Defined Networks,
Software-Defined Data Center (SDDC), Big Data, and IoT Solutions.
Kang-Won Lee
Before SK Telecom, he worked at IBM Watson Research in NY for 14
years. At IBM he led technology development in the areas of Network
Graph Analytics, Spatiotemporal Analytics for LBS, Network Function
Virtualization, and Cloud Computing, IT and network management.
He published more than 100 technical articles in premier conferences
and journals. He serves the technical community as a technical society
president, advisor, journal editor, program chair, keynote speaker, and
proposal reviewer. He holds a PhD in Computer Science from University
of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and a MS and a BS in Computer
Engineering from Seoul National University. He is an ACM Distinguished
Scientist and an IBM Master Inventor.
Summary
IoT and Data Analytics: A New Growth Opportunity
Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to encompass every aspect of our lives
and to generate a paradigm shift towards a hyper-connected society.
Diverse devices are being equipped with the connectivity, creating
useful insights and actions that bring values to our lives. Industrial
IoT is also facing innovations in a wide range of vertical applications.
As a result, enterprises have the additional opportunities to enhance
existing businesses and potentially develop new business models.
Big opportunities equal big challenges. Well be faced with unknown

territories of wireless requirements such as sub-millisecond end-to-
end latency, or 1+ year battery life. Devices and user behaviors will also
be nothing like what we have seen previously in mobile environments.
To make the right preparation to aforementioned challenges, IoT
infrastructure should be designed to optimize flexibility and scalability.
263
In addition, cloud computing and big data analytics are being utilized
to analyze immense amount of data and logs of the real-world.
In this presentation, several case studies of global players will be

introduced to display the intersection of IoT and data analytics.
Also, recent achievements in SKTs IoT R&D and commercial services, as
well as new business opportunities based on IoT and data analytics will be
introduced.
Speaker
Executive Vice President (EVP) of Samsung Electronics,

Republic of Korea
Kyungwhoon Cheun received his B.S. in Electronics Engineering

from Seoul National University in 1985. He earned M.S. and Ph.D.
degrees from the University of Michigan. He was an assistant professor
at University of Delaware from 1989 to 1991 and joined the Pohang
University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in 1991 where he
Kyungwhoon Cheun
is currently a full professor. At POSTECH, he headed the national
ITRC center for Broadband OFDM Multiple Access (BrOMA), an 8 year
research program supported by the Korean Ministry of Knowledge and
Economy. He has also served as an engineering consultant to numerous
industry and was on leave at Witechs and NSystems in San Diego
where he developed efficient receiver algorithms for the IEEE802.11
based WLANs and WCDMA. Since 2012 he has been with Samsung
Electronics DMC R&D Center as executive vice president and leads
the Communications Research Team in the area of next generation
cellular and Wi-Fi networks.
264
Summary
IoT Vision
In 2015 CES, B.K. Yoon, a CEO of Samsung Electronics, promised that
all Samsung hardware will be IoT devices in 5 years. In addition to that,
Samsungs IoT components and devices will be open so that devices
from other companies can easily connect to Samsung devices. In order
to deliver this vision, Samsung tries to provide the world-leading open
components and devices, and on top of them, Open Platforms such as
ARTIK, Simband, SAMI and IoTivity.
ARTIK is a family of hardware modules tailored for IoT. From easy

prototyping to more advanced design, ARTIK modules come with built-
in connectivity and an open software environment. Developers can
focus on creating new products and services without worrying about
hardware detail.
SimBand is an open wearables develper platform which consists of

a watch unit running Tizen OS and a wristband connector that holds
a custom sensor module. Because Simband is modular, develpers can
easily connect sensor modules with new configurations. They can also
develop new algorithms to read and analyze sensing data in real-time,
or access historical data through the data exchange platform "SAMI".
SAMI is a data exchange platform that enables any device or sensor

to push its data to the cloud. Applications, services and devices can
then use that data through simple APIs. SAMI is open and agnostic.
SmartThings OpenCloud is a software and data aggregation service
powered by SAMI. It uses the flexible SAMI APIs to bring the Internet
of Things onto a unified platform.
Samsung is also very active in IoT Standardization. Last year, Samsung,

Intel, and other companies teamed up to form Open Interconnect
Consortium to promote IoT interoperability. As the first outcome,
Samsung released a first version of the IoT open source middleware
software called "IoTivity". The goal of IoTivity is to let billions of wired
and wireless devices connect to each other and to the internet.
Samsung provides not only IoT platforms but also IoT services and
solutions. Samsung launched smart home services connected with
smart appliances such as washing machine, refrigerator, air conditioner,
etc. Key services are device control, home monitoring and customer
services. To make the smart home ecosystem more powerful and more
open, Samung acquired the SmartThings last year. In SmartThings
ecosystem, 3rd party vendors can easily add their devices so that the
265
devices can be discovered and integrated for a service..
Samsung also tries to deliver innovative vertical solutions based on IoT

Technology as a global leader in enterprise mobility and information
technology. Samsung provides a diverse portfolio of enterprise
technologies from smartphones to wearables, tablets, digital displays,
hotel TVs, printers and medical diagnostic equipment. Samsung is
committed to putting the business customer at the core of everything
we do by delivering comprehensive products, solutions and services
across diverse industries including retail, healthcare, hotel, education
and government.
In order to support a fast growing number of IoT devices, a new

wireless connectivity technology is required. Samsung is actively
participating in development of a connectivity technology for a low-
power, wide-area (LPWA) system. The LPWA system is a system in which
a number of low-cost devices with long battery life are connected
to a network which provides wide service area with deep penetration
to underground.
Some LPWA technologies, e.g., Ultra-Narrow Band transmission,

developed by Sigfox, operate in license-exempt spectrum. While
utilizing license-exempt spectrum has benefit of no spectrum fees,
interference due to the congested frequency band may cause
propagation loss, hence decrease the battery life of the LPWA devices.
It is easily anticipated that the loss from interference would be much
severe as the number of LPWA devices in the license-exempt band
is increasing. LPWA technologies using licensed spectrum, on the
other hand, are relatively free from the interferences. Furthermore, it is
attractive, especially from an operator perspective, as existing cellular
network infrastructure can be re-used. 3GPP Long-Term Evolution
Enhanced-Machine Type Communication (LTE eMTC) and 3GPP GSM/
EDGE Radio Access Network Cellular CIoT (GERAN CIoT) are leading
technologies in the field. Samsung is actively contributing to both
standardizations and developments, and has a plan to upgrade the
deployed cellular networks by integrating those technologies.
266
Session 3-1 : Innovation Platforms
Chair
President, National Information Society Agency,

Republic of Korea
Suh Byung-Jo is the president of Koreas National Information Society

Agency (NIA) (March 2015-present). NIA is a government agency,
working with MSIP (Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) and
MOI (Ministry of the Interior), which is in charge of Koreas national
informatization and e-government.
Suh Byung-jo
Passing the 25th Public Administration Exam in 1981, he began his
public career. He worked for ministries and related organizations such
as the Ministry of Information and Communications, the Ministry of
Finance and Economy, and the Economic Planning Board.
His public service positions have included: Spokesperson of the

Ministry of Information and Communications (2005), Assistant
Chairman of the Korea Communications Commission (2009-2010), and
Executive Director of the Presidents Council on National ICT Strategies
(2011-2013). He also served as the First Secretary of Information and
Communications, the Permanent Representative of Korea to the OECD
in Paris, France (2000-2003).
In 2009, Suh received the Red Stripes Order of Service Merit for his
contributions during his career as a public official.
After he left government service, he worked as a Senior Advisor at a law

firm called Kim & Chang (2010-2011); a Chief Consultant at the Inter-
American Development Bank (2013-2014); and a Visiting Professor at
Korea University (2014-2015).
Suh received a B.A. in Public Administration from Korea University

in 1982, completed Public Administration Course Work at the Seoul
National University and Ph.D. Course Work in International Development
Law at the University of Paris 5 in 1985 and 1992, respectively.
267
Panelist
Country Head and Senior Partner of McKinsey &

Company, Republic of Korea
Wonsik Choi is a senior partner at McKinsey & Company and heads the
Korean Office. He is a leader of McKinseys Asia Strategy and Corporate
Finance Practice and Advanced Industries Practice. He co-authored
McKinseys Korea report: Beyond Korean Style Shaping a New Growth
Formula, which was published in April 2013. He served in the National
Wonsik Choi
Economic Advisory Council, which is an advisory entity stipulated
in the Korean Constitution. In the Council, he led the subcommittee
that was responsible for aiding the President in implementing a creative
economy'. Prior to McKinsey, he headed an entrepreneurial venture
and also worked as engineer at Honeywell. He holds a BSE degree
in mechanical and aerospace engineering from Princeton University
and an MBA in finance from The Wharton School of the University
of Pennsylvania.
268
Panelist
Director of Technology Outreach at Naver LABS,

Republic of Korea
Chong-Mok Park is a technical director, software architect, and manager

with over 25 years of software products and technology development
expertise in the field of IT industry. He is currently the director of
technology outreach of NAVER Labs. He joined NAVER in 2007 and
he has directed the development and operation of Hangame's online
Chong-Mok Park
game services. He has also lead the development of web engine
technology for Naver Labs. Prior to NAVER, he has lead embedded
software development projects at Samsung Software Center since
2003. In his early career, he also lead technology developments
at various startups including Allat, WISEngine and Cintel. He has earned
PhD and MS Degree at KAIST and BS Degree at Yonsei University.
269
Speaker
Head of Industry Environment at Nokia, Germany
Ulrich Dropmann leads Nokia Networks Industry Environment unit.

The unit is responsible for global and regional standardization, technical
regulation as spectrum and industry initiatives.
Between 2007 and 2012 Ulrich lead the NSN 3GPP standardization team
Ulrich Dropmann and has served as Head of Delegation to 3GPP. Since 2009 he chaired
the Industry Group European Friends of 3GPP.
Between 1996 and 2007, Ulrich held various positions in R&D of

Siemens Mobile Networks unit. He was responsible for standardization
activities of the core network business unit and managed Siemens
3GPP activities. Ulrich had instrumental role in the definition of the
UMTS architecture as well as in set up of project management in 3GPP.
Ulrich holds a Ph.D. from Tlcom ParisTech from 1996; research area
was the definition of 3G Radio Interface and his research was part of EU
collaborative research program (RACE ATDMA).
Summary
Innovation and Innovation Platforms toward 5G
The topic of the talk will be about innovation and innovation platforms
that enable 5G from perspective of a globally active European based
Technology company Nokia. The presentation will evoke Nokias view
on 5G and the associated technical challenges. It will talk about the
role of different innvoation mechanisms such as own inhouse research,
collaboration with untervities, research with customers. Moreover, we will
speak about the role of innovation platforms such as PPP such as the 5G
PPP in Europe and Platforms such as the 5G Forum.
270
Speaker
Chairman and Founder of TechShop, Inc., USA
Jim Newton is the Chairman and Founder of TechShop, a growing chain

of DIY workshops. He is an avid do-it-yourself enthusiast, long-time
serial entrepreneur, and a lifelong maker. Jim created TechShop in 2006
because he needed a place to build his own inventions and projects.
Before founding TechShop, he was a competitor on the "BattleBots"
Jim Newton
television show, and was the full-time Science Advisor on the Discovery
Channel's hit television series "MythBusters". He spends much of his
time on-site at TechShop locations across the US, and thoroughly
enjoys helping TechShop members with their projects. He also enjoys
baking sourdough bread, camping with his family, and dreaming up
new project ideas.
Summary
Inspiring a Nation of Makers
TechShop is a growing chain of makerspaces which provides its members
with access to tools and equipment, training and guidance, and a creative
community of like-minded people so they can build the things they have
always wanted to make.
The TechShop business model is very similar to that of a health club

or fitness gym. Members pay a monthly or annual membership fee, and
they get access to the facility. We also offer classes on all the equipment in
the shop plus many other topics related to making things.
TechShop was originally founded by Jim Newton because he had a long

list of projects he wanted to build, but did not have access to the tools
and equipment he needed to make them. He built TechShop as a way
271
for him to personally have access to the tools and equipment within
a world-class workshop. Fortunately, it turned out that a lot of other
people needed the same access to tools and equipment, and TechShop
began to expand.
After nearly ten years in business, TechShop has eight locations in the US,
and will open its first location outside of the United States in October of
this year in Paris, France. We have ambitious plans for expansion into many
other cities in the United States as well as the Middle East, Japan, and
Korea.
TechShop is designed to help everyone realize their ideas. Everyone has

an idea for something they want to make. It could be a gift for someone,
an invention idea for their home or car or daily life, a new product idea, an
artistic project. The problem is that most people get an idea for something
they want to make, but they give up on the idea right away because they
dont know how to make it. They dont know what kind of materials to
use, they dont know what tools to use or where to get access to the tools,
and they dont know anyone who they can ask for help to start the project
and see it through. TechShop is specifically designed to provide solutions
for all these things so people can build their dreams here as we say in our
slogan on our logo.
We offer a wide variety of equipment and capabilities to our members

in order to help them be able to make just about anything. The vast list
of equipment includes a full machine shop with milling machines and
lathes and even a CNC milling machine, a full woodworking shop, various
3D printers and a 3D scanner, an extensive sewing and textiles area
for making clothing, costumes and fabric and leather related projects,
computer-controlled laser cutters, sheet metal tools and machines,
metalworking tools including saws, grinders and press brakes, plastics
equipment such as vacuum forming machine and an injection molding
press, printing and silk screening equipment, finishing equipment
including sandblasting, painting and powder coating, automotive tools
for repairing and modifying cars, a full welding shop for cutting and
welding metal, and even a computer-controlled water jet cutter that
can cut any material, no matter if it is metal, wood, plastic, fabric, foam,
concrete, stone, glass, or whatever, up to 6 inches thick!
Many of our members have produced amazing projects, products and

even highly successful companies. Some of the most interesting ones are:
Lightning Motors was created by two TechShop members. They have

created the worlds fastest electric motorcycle. They plan to go into
272
full production, and envision their bikes as being the Tesla Motors
for motorcycles.
Square is the largest payment system with credit card reader in the United
States, and was developed at TechShop by two of its members.
Embrace is an infant warming system that was developed by a TechShop

member and is on track to save 100,000 babies lives in the first five years
of production in third-world and developing regions across the world.
TechShops mission is to empower people so they can realize their

ideas into real projects, products and companies. Through our mission,
TechShop helps change and improve peoples lives, helps to create new
jobs, and aims to help everyone find prosperity.
Speaker
Secretary for Innovation Policy to the President of the

Republic of Bulgaria, Bulgaria
Anna-Marie Vilamovska is the Secretary for Innovation Policy and

Healthcare Policy to the President of the Republic of Bulgaria.
She co-chairs the Presidential Council for Science and Education and
the Council for Social and Economic Development. Representing
Anna-Marie Vilamovska Bulgaria at the EU Member States Board on Digital Entrepreneurship,
her focus currently falls on fostering international innovation platforms
and the digitization of traditional industries. A lead in the EC Watify
Digital Entrepreneurship Campaign and an eSkills 2015 Ambassador,
Anna-Marie also runs the John Atanasoff Outstanding Young IT
Scientists and Entrepreneurs Awards and Bulgarias largest charity
initiative - the Bulgarian Christmas. Before joining the Presidents
Cabinet, she worked for the World Bank Group on pension systems
design, in Central and South Asia, the Middle East, and Central Europe,
and co-led applied policy impact projects at the RAND Corporation
in Los Angeles and Brussels in the fields of health information
technology, health innovation and economics.
273
Session 3-2 : Smart Manufacturing
Chair
Dean of College of Engineering, Seoul National

University, Republic of Korea
Kunwoo Lee is a professor in the School of Mechanical and Aerospace

Engineering at Seoul National University in Korea. He received his BS
(1978) from Seoul National University, and MS (1981) and PhD (1984)
in mechanical engineering from MIT. He was previously an assistant
professor in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,
Kunwoo Lee
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, a visiting associate professor
in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at MIT, and a visiting
professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Stanford
University. Currently, He is a Dean in College of Engineering, Seoul
National University and a Vice President at The National Academy
of Engineering of Korea. And he was appointed as a fellow of the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2013. He also has served
as co-editor in chief of the Journal of Computer Aided Design from
1994 to 2014. He was a director of Advanced Institute of Convergence
Technology from 2004 to 2009 and he was newly appointed as
a Global Engineering Deans Council Executive Committee. His research
interests include CAD system supporting multi-resolution modeling,
custom tailoring systems for shoes and wigs, medical device design,
and integrated framework in which products can be designed based
on simultaneous simulation of products and human operator.
274
Panelist
Head of Digital Factory Department in DF/PD Division

of Siemens, Germany
Thorsten Buchta is born and grown up in Freiburg/Germany. He joined

Siemens in 1988. He has a Master in electrical engineering as well as
master in business administration (University of Freiburg/Germany). He
worked already 25 years in Siemens in several positions and countries.
After his University he worked as Sales Manager in Siemens Germany.
Thorsten Buchta
Then he was sent to HQ as Marketing and Promotion Manager for
Factory Automation. He was former Head of PCbased Automation
Systems in Siemens Italy, aswell as Head of PCbased Automation in
Siemens HQ Nuremberg/Germany. Since almost 5 years Mr. Buchta is
working in Siemens Ltd. Seoul. There he is responsible as Managing
Director for the Digital Factory business.
Thorsten Buchta held already several lectures about Industry 4.0. He is

consulting several Korean companies on their way to a smarter factory.
Panelist
Managing partner of Deloitte Consulting Korea,

Republic of Korea
Alex Jo has worked with Deloitte over 14 years. Prior to Deloitte,

he had years of experience in a global multi-national corporation and
other professional services firms. Currently, as a managing partner
of Korea Consulting, he is responsible for managing the practice. His
experience encompasses the projects of new business strategy, strategy
Alex Jo
formulation, value-creating growth strategy, corporate development,
275
M&A strategy, etc. He has performed numerous projects in financial,
telecom, technology, consumer, and energy industries for multi-national
and emerging companies in Korea, U.S., Canada, and across all the major
Asian countries. His key clients are Apple, Toshiba, Ricoh, Samsung
Electronics, GE Plastic, SK Telecom, etc. About his other professional
careers, he was a senior manager of Vancouver based chartered
accountants firm. In Assurance & Advisory division, he executed
numerous projects in the areas of Management advisory, Audit and
Corporate tax. Prior to the firm, he worked at Samsung Electronics as
a product manager. He also served at U.S. Department of Commerce and
Oklahoma Department of Commerce at Dallas and Tulsa.
Panelist
Director of Asia Sales and Marketing at 3D Systems,

Republic of Korea
So Young (Michelle) Baek, Director of Asia Sales and Marketing at

3D Systems, has worked for 3D Scanning, Design, Engineering,
Manufacturing fields for 17 years. Michelle worked as of general manager
in EMEA (Europe, Middle East Asia and Africa) and led the diverse
design to manufacturing projects and solution consultancy with the
So Young Baek
major leading companies from aerospace, automotive, marine, AEC
(Architecture Engineering and Construction) Electronics and Health Care
industry. Based on the field experience from design to manufacturing,
Michelle is exploring the digital thread, 3D printing technology, additive
manufacturing applications and best practices. She is keeping up with
expanding the boundary of 3D printing applications in combination with
the conventional and digital engineering and manufacturing experience.
276
Speaker
President of the Fraunhofer Society

(Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft), Germany
Reimund Neugebauer graduated from the Technische Universitat

Dresden (TUD) in 1979 with a degree in mechanical engineering. There,
he received his doctorate in 1984 and gained the post of professor
in 1989. In 1993 he was appointed chair of the Machine Tools
department at the Technische Universitat Chemnitz (TU Chemnitz).
Reimund Neugebauer
In 2012, he became the president of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft. This
year, he was appointed co-chair of the German federal governments
High-Tech Forum, an advisory board for the development of Germanys
research and development policy. As a member of the Acatech
Innovation Dialogue Steering Committee, he engages with Chancellor
Merkel and other government representatives as well as with high-
ranking representatives of science, industry and society on issues of
future innovation policy. He is also on the executive board of the newly
established Platform Industrie 4.0, an alliance of representatives from
politics, industry, associations, science and trade unions.
Summary
FRAUNHOFER MODEL- The Innovation System
Germany is among the European and global innovation leaders with the
second highest share of world trade in R&D-intensive goods, just behind
China. This success is also owed to its innovation system characterized by
a broad and differentiated structure with a multitude of public and private
actors.
As the leading application-oriented research organization in Europe, the

Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft is driving innovation for solving global challenges,
strengthening economic growth and improving quality of life.
The Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft plays an important role in the German

new High-Tech Strategy to maintain Germany's prominent innovation
capacities. The German High-Tech Strategy has chosen five especially
important priority tasks: Digital Economy and society, sustainable
economic activities and energy, an innovative world of work, health, smart
277
mobility and civil security, which are a good match with the main research
areas of Fraunhofer. Some of the Fraunhofer core topics relate to smart
and resource efficient production, secure ICT and energy technologies.
However, the general reduction in public spending also affects research

spending. Approx. 70% of the income of the Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft is
generated through contract research, mostly with industries, and approx.
30% is provided as base funding from public federal and state sources.
According to the so-called Fraunhofer Model, the base funding amount
is based on the performance level of income from contract research.
Declines in public and base funding pose challenges for the Fraunhofer-
Gesellschaft to finance more early-stage preparatory research that is
necessary to have new technologies ready for application in time.
The Fraunhofer Lighthouse projects aim at realizing visionary concepts

through application-oriented R&D with the goals of:
Achieving resource-efficient production, emission neutrality and

improved human integration in industrial production processes.
Finding solutions for saving of up to 50% of rare earth elements in

magnets for electric motors.
Improving the transfer of R&D for achieving broad diffusion of electric

mobility.
Developing intelligent implants that combine therapeutic with

diagnostic functions to minimize the need for surgery and improve
safety and quality of life.
The efficient use of resources is a prime goal in these projects and one of
the major objectives of Fraunhofer R&D. Efficient production methods and
intelligently networked technologies can make a huge contribution in
this regard.
Innovative project examples from these research areas will be shown in

the presentation.
278
Speaker
CEO and Founder of SOLS, USA
Kegan Schouwenburg is the founder and CEO of SOLS, a NYC startup

redesigning the way you move through mass customized 3D printed
footwear. She is also a leading voice in the 3D printing and mass
customization industry. Her passion to bring nascent technologies
to the consumer market is reflective in her years of experience in the
Kegan Schouwenburg
industrial design and mass-manufacturing space. Before launching
SOLS, she was the director of engineering and operations at
Shapeways, where she helmed one of the worlds largest 3D printing
factories. Kegan has been recognized on Forbes 30 Under 30 list for
2015 along with Business Insider's 30 Most Important Women under
30 in Tech, 20 Hottest Startups Founded by Women and The Coolest
People in New York City Tech lists. She is also a mentor at connected
devices accelerator, TechStars. Kegan holds a B.S. in industrial design
and manufacturing from the Pratt Institute located in Brooklyn, NY.
Summary
Step into the Future - Smart Manufacturing
Todays world of manufacturing delivers inconsistent results: inaccurate
processes, fragmented productionresulting in high price points and
limited accessibility.
As a pioneer in developing technology that supports mass customization,

SOLS leverages data to usher in a new perspective in manufacturing that
is 100% digital, ensures central production with the highest QC standards,
leading to potential cost reductions; thus allowing more access to a
spectrum of products.
Smart manufacturing answers the question: Can 3d scanning, generative

design and 3d printing usher in the world we want to live in tomorrow,
today? We believe the answer is yes, and its effects extend beyond
orthoticsto prosthetics, shoes, helmets, shin guards, clothing, braces, etc.
279
Speaker
Vice President, Korea Smart Factory Foundation,

Republic of Korea
Kyoung Han Bae is the vice president of KOSF (Korea Smart Factory
Foundtion, KOSF is a leading Smart Factory related institute in the area
of R&D, standardization and propagation). He is the leadr of Korea Smart
Factory Program, especially Smart Factory Propagation Program. In
2014, he designed the standard smart factory development guideline
Kyoung Han Bae
in order to make SMEs understand the concept of smart factory,
planned propagation program and did trial project with voluntary 133
Small manufacturing companies.
He studied Industrial Engineering and Operations Research and got

PH.D. at Korea University. From 1984, He worked at MIS research center
of KIDA (Korea Institute for Defence Analyses) for 6 years, and worked
in the area of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Factory Automation,
Supply Chain Management, ERP, APS (Advanced Planning & Scheduling)
for 16 yreas at Samsung SDS and HIT (Hyundai Information Technology).
In 2008, He joined KCCI (Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry)
and started to reacher and make standard about IoT (especially about
EPCGlobal) for 7 years.
Summary
Korea Smart Factory Program
Korea smart factory program is composed of propagation the Smart
Factory to Manufacturing SMEs, R&D and standardization of smart factory
technologies.
This program was started at 2014. Several teams were organized and
worked for the preparation by the mission. At this time, Korea planned
a great project to propagate the Smart Factory to Manufacturing SMEs.
First, the project team was organized. And the team designed standard
smart factory development guideline. With tie guideline, the team tried
prototype project. At the project, 133 SMEs joined and successfully
completed.
280
The Smart Factory propagation project defines the smart factory as 4
levels, basic level, 1st intermediate level, 2nd intermediate level and smart
level. And the range of smart factory is from the digital automation layer
to business layer. So the system range is very big. These concepts are
included in the standard smart factory development guideline with
explaining 11 representative processes.
R&D team also started to work to develop smart factory system

architectures & standard platforms, CPSs and IoTs. The team defined
the R&D roadmap and planned the projects developing smart factory
technologies.
This topic introduces Korea Smart Factory Program with concepts, current
actions, effects and plan.
281
Session 3-3 : Convergence with the Arts, Cultures and
Humanities
Chair
East office of Finnish Industries and Finnish-Russian

Chamber of Commerce, Executive Chairman of the
Board, Former Prime Minister of Finland, Finland
Esko Aho is the Executive Chairman of the Board at East Office of Finnish
Industries, a non-profit company of 25 leading Finnish corporations.
Mr. Aho also chairs the board of Finnish-Russian Chamber of Commerce
(FRCC). In addition, he is Consultative Partner at Nokia.
Esko Aho Mr. Aho was a Member of the Finnish Parliament for 20 years, from
1983 to 2003. He chaired the Centre Party from 1990 to 2002, and was
elected Prime Minister in 1991 - 1995 at the age of 36, making him the
youngest PM in Finlands history.
Currently Mr. Aho serves as elected member of the Executive Board at

the International Chamber of Commerce. He is also an invited member
of Club de Madrid, an independent organization of former heads of
state and government.
In March 2015, he was named as Executive in Residence at Aalto

University, Department of Management Studies at the School of
Business. Mr. Aho holds honorary doctorate degrees from the University
of Vaasa, Finland, and the University of Alberta, Canada.
282
Panelist
Head of Land and Housing Institute, Republic of Korea
In Keun Lee has been the Head of Land and Housing Institute (LHI)
since September 2013. Before joining LHI he worked for the Seoul
Metropolitan Government. Over the 32 years in the government,
he served at various departments dealing with urban planning
and infrastructure-related projects for the capital. Major positions
In Keun Lee
he held include director for Subway Planning and Design, director
for Engineering Review, director-general for Cheong Gye Cheon
Restoration Project and director-general for Urban Planning Bureau
of Seoul. Later he was promoted to assistant mayor and was in charge
of infrastructure of the metropolitan area. He graduated from Seoul
National University with a BSC degree in civil engineering in 1979.
In 1985 he won a Korean Government Fellowship for overseas study.
He carried out engineering research at City University of London
and received a PhD degree in 1991. He is a Fellow of the Institution
of Civil Engineers, UK and a senior member of National Academy
of Engineering of Korea.
Panelist
Director of Future IT Convergence Lab / Head of Dept.

of Creative IT Engineering, Republic of Korea
Jin S. Lee received the B.S. degree in electronics engineering from

Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, in 1975, the M.S. degree
in electrical engineering and computer science from the University
of California, Berkeley, in 1980, and the Ph.D. degree in system science
from the University of California, Los Angeles, in 1984. From 1984
Jin S. Lee
to 1985, he worked as a Member of the Technical Staff at AT&T Bell
283
Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ, and, from 1985 to 1989, as a senior member
of the Engineering Staff at GE Advanced Technology Laboratories,
Mt. Laurel, NJ. Since 1989, he has been a Professor at Pohang University
of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Korea. From 2000
to 2003, he served as the Dean of Research Affairs at POSTECH.
From 2007 to 2012, he also served as the Dean of Academic Affairs
at POSTECH. He is currently the Director of Future IT Convergence
Laboratory and the Head of Creative IT Engineering Department.
Speaker
Architect-director of MVRDV, Netherlands
Winy Maas Prof. Ir. Ing FRIBA HAIA (1959, Schijndel, The Netherlands)
is an architect, urban designer and landscape architect and one
of the co-founding directors of the globally operating architecture
and urban planning firm MVRDV. He is professor at and director of The
Why Factory, a research institute for the future city he founded in 2008
Winy Maas
at TU Delft. He is currently Visiting Professor at IIT Chicago, the Catholic
University of Louvain, Belgium and the University of Hong Kong, and has
been at ETH Zurich, Berlage Institute, MIT, Ohio State and Yale University.
He curates exhibitions, lectures throughout the world and takes part in
international juries.
In 2013 Winy Maas joined the Economic Development Board of

Rotterdam (EDBR). With both MVRDV and The Why Factory he has
published a series of research projects.
284
Speaker
Director of EG, USA
Michael Hawley is one of those rare innovators who can express his
passion and insight through science and technology, art and design.
He directs the annual EG conference in Monterey, widely hailed as the
most inspired gathering of creative talents in the world. He pioneered
digital cinema technology at LucasFilm. He worked intimately with
Michael Hawley
Steve Jobs at the inception of NeXT. As a photographer, he innovated
digital photo systems and was the first to produce very large format
fine-art prints. His book on Bhutan was named the Worlds Largest
Published Book by Guinness World Records. An early faculty member
at MITs Media Lab, he was founder and director of several significant
and highly entrepreneurial research thrusts to develop a very broad
array of game-changing technologies.
Summary
Conflusion: Life After Convergence
Convergence is not news. Creative talents, corporations, and cultures are
converged, or well on their way. The roots of this are in the unifying force
of digitally coded information, and the plasticity of processing elements.
Sensors, memories, computers, displays, communications links and
other fundamental information processing components are all shrinking
exponentially in size and cost, and being woven and blended into every layer
of the physical fabric around us. Whole industries and societies have been or
are being upended: the collapse of Kodak as a film photography monopoly
is, in a sense, not entirely different from the Arab Spring revolution or the idea
of online university learning available to the whole world.
As ever, innovative momentum is found in confluences. Some seem small

(wearable technologies, cameras the size of pills), some are big (social
media, drones and autonomous robots of all sorts), but all carry important
consequences.
This talk will explore some of whats hot in artistic and creative enterprises.
285
Speaker
Head of Music Partnerships of Google, Republic of Korea
I earned a Master of Business Administration from the Wharton School,

University of Pennsylvania, and U.S. CPA certificate in Delaware. After
IBM Korea, I worked at the Boston Consulting Group as a consultant and
developed business strategies mainly for the health care and financial
services. In the following years, I joined Google Korea as a marketing
Sun Lee
manager and transferred to YouTube Asia-Pacific where I collaborated
with Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation (MBC) and organized the 1 st
K-Pop concert in Mountain View where Google HQ is located. Since
2013, I have led YouTube partnerships in Korea focusing on the music
vertical. With the passion for introducing Korean music to global fans,
I initiated Beyond K-Pop, the live-streaming concert series with cross
genres musicians (e.g. Kiha and Faces, 10cm, Tiger JK, etc.) and worked
on YouTube Music Awards that Girls Generation (in 2013), BIGBANG and
2NE1 (in 2015) were announced as the winners.
Summary
The future of content
K-Pop has become a global phenomenon over past years. There were
many drivers to the K-Pops growth, such as the change of music
consumption pattern and easy access to music, and YouTubes global
network and technology would be the key driver.
In my presentation, I would like to share how YouTube contributed to

the diffusion of K-Pop. I will also present how content has evolved and
what would come in the future, based on YouTube trends. No border
exists in content world any more fans from all over the world watch
their favorite content, producers are not limited to professionals but
anybody can produce content and share, online stars get popular
offline. I hope my presentation provides an opportunity to think about
how to create values in such a borderless area.
286
Session 4-1 : Climate Change and Environment
Chair
Fellow at Korea Institute of Science and Technology

(KIST), Republic of Korea
Kil-Choo Moon is currently a fellow at Korea Institute of Science and

Technology (KIST). Since he joined KIST in 1991, he has significantly
contributed to laying foundation for atmospheric research in Korea.
He has held various positions at KIST, and served as the President from
2010 to 2013. He was an advisor for the Presidential Advisory Council
Kil-Choo Moon
on Science & Technology and is a current member of the Presidential
Council on Intellectual Property. He is currently a project manager
of V-KIST Project, a project establishing a national research institute
in Vietnam based on KISTs experience to advance Vietnams science
and technology field. He actively participates in various domestic and
international academic activities for the advancement of environmental
technology. He has been involved in establishing National Science
and Technology Policy as a member of committees. Since 2013,
he has served as the President of International Union of Air Pollution
Prevention and Environment Protection Associations (IUAPPA).
287
Panelist
Director of Institute Pierre Simon Laplace, France
Herv Le Treut is professor at University Pierre et Marie Curie and

at Ecole Polytechnique in Paris, France. He is a physicist, and he has
active in the development of climate models and their application
to climate change. He is director of Institut Pierre Simon Laplace,
a leading institute for both observational and modelling climate studies.
Herv Le Treut
He has been involved in all IPCC assessment reports and a member
of the French Academy of Sciences. He was one of the co-organizers
of the conference Our Common Future under Climate Change held
at UNESCO in July 2015, and involved in the preparation of COP21.
Speaker
Professor of Stockholm University, Sweden
rjan Gustafsson is professor at Stockholm University in the Dept of

Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry and currently a visiting
Professor at University of California San Diego (Dept of Chemistry and
Scripps Institution of Oceanography). His research has in recent years
been published in scientific journals such as Nature, Science, Nature
rjan Gustafsson
Geoscience and PNAS. His research is carried out in close collaboration
with colleagues in India, Bangladesh, the Maldives, Nepal, China, Korea,
Russia, USA and EU. It spans from the sources and behavior of climate-
and health-affecting aerosols in South and East Asia to the vulnerability
of thawing permafrost and collapsing hydrates in the Arctic re-adding
CO2 and CH4 to the atmosphere through climate-carbon-cryosphere
288
couplings. He is Director of the Maldives Climate Observatory and
a long-term investigator at the Korea Climate Observatory on Jeju
Island, both of the UNEP-coordinated Atmospheric Brown Cloud (ABC)
Program.
Summary
Brown Clouds over South and East Asia, Release of
greenhouse gases from a thawing Arctic and how
severe effects from climate change on the Worlds
3 billion poorest may be avoided
The effects from our emissions of climate-perturbing gases and aerosols
are evident all the way from the tropics to the North Pole. We are the
first generation to be broadly aware of these consequences yet the last
generation able to turn global development into a path of sustainability
to avoid severely undermining the living space for our children and
coming generations.
Activities in the densely populated and rapidly developing South

and East Asian regions cause emissions of gases and particles from
incomplete combustion that mixes into a reactive and climate-perturbing
atmospheric soup. These Atmospheric Brown Clouds (ABC) are visible
from space and are wintertime covering larger areas of the regional land
masses and the outflow also covers vast areas of the ocean. The ABCs
cause dimming of the land and ocean surface (decreasing evaporation),
warming of the atmosphere, reduces crop yields (food security), changes
climatic zones and precipitation, melts the Himalayan glaciers and thus
undermines the freshwater supply to billions (water security), and causes
massive respiratory diseases, including the premature deaths for several
millions each year only in S and E Asia. Science is needed to understand
both the sources to guide efficient mitigation efforts and to understand
and articulate the effects.
Climate warming is amplified in the Arctic, with potential for several

positive feedback effects (i.e., Nature responses that further accelerate
climate warming). These include sea ice melting (decreasing the albedo/
whiteness of the Earth) and release of carbon dioxide and methane
from the Sleeping Giants of the global carbon stores when land and
subsea permafrost thaws and shallow subsea stores of methane hydrates
collapse. The state of this science will be briefly reviewed.
Finally, the plight of the poorest due to climate change will be

emphasized. The top 1 billion people stand for some 60% of the global
289
CO2 emissions, while the bottom 3 billion, who do not have access
to affordable fossil fuels, are responsible for a mere 6%. While we all will
soon be affected by climate change, it is, tragically, the latter three billion
that will experience the worst consequences. A number of actions must
be taken now, particularly by the top 1 billion responsible for the bulk
of the emissions. Emissions of carbon dioxide must be reduced and then
eliminated in a decarbonization move from fossil fuels to clean energy.
In the process, energy efficiency will help and reduction of so-called
short-lived climate pollutants (e.g. black carbon soot and other products
of incomplete combustion) will give quick effects and co-benefits also
to food security and clean air. Access to sustainable energy seems
essential as the bottom 3 billion swings up from poverty.
Speaker
Climate Technology Manager at UNEP, UNFCCC Climate

Technology Centre and Network, U.K.
Jason Spensley is a Climate Technology Manager with the climate

technology, biological diversity and local economic community
development. He is currently the Climate Technology Manager with
the Climate Technology Centre and Network, which serves as the
operational arm of the UNFCCCs Technology Mechanism. He also has
Jason Spensley
an extensive background in biological diversity, as programme officer
in the Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity focused
on financing for protected areas solutions to address climate change
and improve livelihoods. He also worked for many years with The
Nature Conservancy as senior scientist and senior policy advisor,
in Asia and the Pacific, as well as Latin America and the Caribbean.
He has written extensively on climate change vulnerability, adaptation
monitoring, and ecosystem-based solutions to addressing climate
change and biodiversity loss. He is fluent in English, French and Spanish
and currently resides in Denmark.
290
Summary
Addressing Climate Change and the Biodiversity Crisis:
Technology transfer and deployment through the CBD
and UNFCCC
The science is undeniable that we creating a climate crisis with
catastrophic economic effects, unless we take bold and immediate action.
At the same time, we are facing unprecedented loss of biological diversity
with devastating human impacts. This is occurring while our society
has the technological and scientific knowledge to mitigate and adapt
to a great deal of the climate and biodiversity problems that our world
is currently facing. Why then are we not developing, piloting and scaling
up the use of these technologies on a more systematic and impactful
basis? The answers range from governance to financing challenges, and
everything in between.
This presentation will focus on synergies between climate change and

biological diversity solutions, and growing effort to strengthen these
solutions. Many of the technology solutions to the climate crises are also
good for biological diversity. Similarly, biodiversity health and ecosystem
resilience is the basis of many cost effective and lasting technology
solutions to address climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Furthermore, some of the greatest environmental solutions are age-old
solutions. Tangible examples will be shared in this presentation.
This presentation will also focus on specific mechanisms and initiatives

in the context of the Climate Change and Biodiversity Conventions,
to catalyse technology and scientific transfer and deployment.
The Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) has been created
as the implementation arm of the UNFCCC Technology Mechanism,
and mandated to stimulate technology cooperation and enhance the
development and transfer of technologies to developing countries at their
request, through a global consortium and network of climate technology
innovators. The Convention on Biological Diversity also has a rich history
of technological, technical and scientific cooperation. The BioBridge
Initiative has been recently created by the Presidency of this Convention,
to catalyse and strengthen technical and scientific cooperation to address
the biodiversity crisis. Although the UNFCCCs CTCN has only been
operative for less than two years and CBDs BioBridge Initiative are only
starting their work, much can be learned from these growing efforts
about how the international community and multi-lateral programmes
can better catalyse cost-effective and impactful actions to develop, pilot
and scale up climate technology solutions.
291
Speaker
Vice President for Resources Development, Asian Institute

of Technology (AIT) / Professor of Environmental Science
Center and Graduate Program, Department of Urban
Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan
Kazuo Yamamoto graduated from the Department of Urban Engineering,

Faculty of Engineering, the University of Tokyo (UT ) in 1977. He
received his Masters in 1979 and his PhD in 1983 from UT. In 1985, he
Kazuo Yamamoto was appointed Associate Professor of the Faculty of Engineering, UT
and seconded to the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) for two years
from 1987. He served as professor in the Faculty of Engineering and
Environmental Center, UT since 1995. In January 2014, he was appointed
Vice President for Resource Development at AIT and currently serves as
professor in the Environmental Science Center. Currently, he is President
of the Water Reuse Promotion Center, Japan. Some of the awards he has
received are: Membrane Technology Award 2009 as the first awardee
from Membrane Technology Specialist Group; IWA, Academic Award
2013, (Japan Society on Water Environment); Grand Award 2015 (Japan
Society of Material Cycle and Waste Management).
Summary
Mitigation and/or Adaptation on Frequent Drought and
Water Shortage
Water has cyclic nature in the surface layer on the globe. Although
the total amount of the cycle flow might not be changed significantly,
a slight increase in average atmospheric temperature caused by
global warming gives more fluctuations locally and temporarily. Thus,
we observe flood and drought more frequently than we observed before.
We need to tackle with Climate Change by comprehensive countermeasures

of mitigation and/or adaptation for Water-Food-Energy nexus issues.
Water is essential for any life; it is one of basic human needs that must be
cheap and sufficient, it supports all of economic activities and maintains
quality of urban/rural life and environment.
One of most important adaptive ways to water shortage is to keep

water environment clean, which increases potential of accessible water
292
resources for any ecological life, ensuring inexpensive water use and
maintain biodiversity. Effective water use is also important: i.e., reduce
and reuse (Water 2R). We have good practices of a large reduction of
fresh water consumption in water-eater industries by applying various
effective water use measures mainly in developed countries. They are
readily applicable to similar industries in any country and region, because
they had succeeded in win-win situation, i.e. save water = save money.
Largest part of water consumption is needed for agriculture; a cascade
water reuse is most practical, economic and energy efficient, where
water quality control is another issue requiring good practices for its
implementation, e.g. legal regulations, monitoring, emergency control
measures, and so on.
Manner of water use is cultural dependent. For example, dry sanitation is

an effective way to reduce water consumption and wastewater treatment
cost, and also to promote resources recovery. However, it might not yet
be acceptable in the region, such as South-East Asia, where people are
in the habit of using water for their toilet. Knowledge and then
Technology is also true to consider effective use of water.
Water reuse technologies are readily applicable to direct and indirect reuse
purposes. From the viewpoint of balancing water quality requirement
and energy consumption, there must be priority of selection of such
technologies. Some of water reuse technologies are presented here.
293
Speaker
Professor of Ewha Womans University, Department of

Environmental Science and Engineering, Republic of Korea
Yong Pyo Kim is the chair and professor in the department of chemical
engineering and materials science, Ewha Womans University, Republic
of Korea. He has been trained as a chemical engineer (BS at Seoul
National University, MS at KAIST, and PhD at CALTECH) and worked
at Korea Institute of Science and Technology before joining to Ewha
Yong Pyo Kim
on 2000. His research interests are mainly on air quality issues including
interactions between gaseous and aerosol species, data analysis and
modeling of ambient trace species, and integrated management
of air pollutants and greenhouse gases. He is also actively involved
in the policy issues on the research and development of science and
technology. He has published more than 200 scientific research articles
and received several awards.
Summary
Fine particles problems in the mega-cities of Northeast
Asia: A case study of Seoul
Northeast Asia can be characterized by high emissions of anthropogenic
air pollutants, mainly due to the consumption of a large amount of
energy, and large population. China, Japan, and Republic of Korea
consumed 19.9% (1st in the world), 4.1% (5th), and 2.2% (9th) of the
world total primary energy, respectively in 2011. In addition, the
increase rate of the primary energy consumption in China is very high,
about 8% per year, and more than a half of the world total coal was
consumed in China. Among the air pollutants, ambient fine particles
are known to cause several detrimental effects such as the increase
of human mortality and morbidity, reduing visibility, and climate
change. Recently China, Japan, and Republic of Korea have adopted
a new air quality standards for fine particles (PM2.5, particulate matter
with an aerodynamic diameter of less than or equal to a nominal
10 m) to reduce the ambient concentrations of fine particles. However,
unlike PM10, the previous air quality standard for ambient particles,
a major fraction of the PM2.5 mass is generated in the atmosphere via
294
chemical reactions. Thus, to develop effective control strategies against
PM2.5, it is necessary (1) to understand the major chemical pathways
of generating PM2.5, (2) to validate the emission inventories and
ambient levels of precursor species, and (3) to quantify the effect of the
transport of PM2.5 from outside to the area of interes in addition to the
conventional emission control of particles.
There are several mega-cities in Northeast Asia. In case of Seoul, with

an area of 605 km2, total population is over 10 million and the number
of vehicles reached almost 3 million in 2010. In the Seoul Metropolitan
Area (SMA), the population reached to about 24 million in 2013.
To manage air quality in these mega-cities, Several measured have
been carried out in each mega-cities such as strong regulation on the
emissions from diesel vehicles in Tokyo and comprehensive regulation
on coal usage and vehicular emissions in Beijing. In Repulic of Korea,
the Basic Plan on the Metropolitan Air Quality Management (Plan) was
established in 2005 to improve the air quality over the SMA. The original
first stage Plan was to invest 4.73 trillion Won (4.3 billion USD) which
would lead to a substantial reduction of the ambient concentrations of
PM10 and NO2. With the start of the second stage Plan in 2015, PM2.5
has been designated as one of the target air pollutants.
In this presentation, the trends of the air pollutants concentrations

over Seoul are shown, the air quality management plans or policies
carried out in Seoul have been reviewed, and current understanding
of the state of the air quality, especially on fine particles over Seoul are
presented.
295
Session 4-2 : S&T for Global Cohesion
Chair
He received a BS degree in engineering at Seoul National University

in 1984 and completed the Ph. D degree at State University
of New York at Buffalo in 1993. Since 1999, he has been a professor
at the Department of Chemical and Biological engineering, Seoul
National University. For his outstanding research accomplishments
Jeyong Yoon
in environmental engineering field, he received a research award from
the Ministry of Environment (2000). He has worked as the president
of Korean Society for Drinking Water and the vice dean of the School
of Engineering at Seoul National University. Currently, he is the
president of Scientists and Engineers without Boarders, and the
Academic Society of Appropriate Technology as well, for supplying
useful science and engineering technologies to developing countries,
supporting global scientists and engineers education.
296
Panelist
Senior Policy Advisor of OECD, Republic of Korea
Seungju Baek is currently working as Senior Policy Advisor of the

Knowledge Sharing Alliance (KSA) at the Office of the Secretary
General (OSG) of the OECD. Before joining the OECD he had worked
for the Korean Ministry of Strategy and Finance (MOSF) for almost 22
years. He has built strong knowledge and experiences in establishing
Seungju Baek
development policy and implementation strategies and allocating
resources in various fields including regional development, SOC,
industry, SMEs, energy, resources, and agriculture. In particular,
he worked closely with the World Bank and the Korea Development
Institute (KDI) in conducting the Knowledge Partnership (KP) Program,
which was designed to share Koreas development experiences and
knowledge with developing countries. He studied Economics and
received the M.S, degree in public policy from the Seoul National
University, Korea, and the University of Colorado, United States. He also
finished the Ph.D. course of public policy in Korea University, Korea.
297
Speaker
CEO and Chairman of Windhorse International, USA
Paul Polak is the Founder, CEO and Chairman of Windhorse International,

a for-profit company serving the billion customers at the bottom
of the income pyramid, and the Founder of D-Rev, a non-profit design
incubator for technologies that serves customers living on less than $4
a day. In 1981, he founded International Development Enterprises (IDE),
Paul Polak
a non-profit organization that has brought nearly 20 million of the
worlds poorest people out of poverty by making radically affordable
irrigation technology available to farmers through local small-scale
entrepreneurs, and opening private sector access to markets for their
crops. His first book, Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional
Approaches Fail, has become a renowned resource for practical
solutions to global poverty. His second book, The Business Solution
to Poverty, published in 2013 with co-author Mal Warwick, has been
adopted as a leading guide to profitable solutions to ending poverty on
a truly large scale.
Summary
The Business Solution to Poverty: Designing Products
and Services for 3 Billion New Customers
Business leaders today spend all their time trying to serve the richest
10% of the worlds customers while the other 90% represent an
unparalleled opportunity for entrepreneurs, investors and existing
businesses to open new markets, gain new customers and earn big
profits. These actors have an opportunity to transform the lives of those
2.7 billion people at the bottom of the pyramid and bring them fully
into the 21st-Century market economy by creating jobs and putting
more money into their pockets. We need a revolution in business
thinking and action to create products and services for the other 90%,
not only because it is the moral thing to do, but because there are
vast new profitable markets awaiting the brave companies willing
to create ruthlessly affordable new products serving the worlds 2.7
billion bypassed customers who live on less than $2 a day. I believe
298
there is one sure way, and only one way, to foster genuine social
change on a large scale among the worlds poverty-stricken billions
by harnessing the power of business to the task of helping poor people
earn money through innovative design that takes into account their
specific contexts and needs.
The major pillars of my approach are ruthless affordability, zero-based

design, scalability, a decentralized supply chain and the institution of
responsible practices. In designing products that will open up new
markets among the worlds poor, ruthless affordability is the single
most important objective. However, design for extreme affordability
rarely comes easily. Making anything both workable and cheap may
take years of careful, incremental adaptation and revision. To the
40% of the worlds customers who live on less than $2 a day, these
products have the potential to open up access to vast new markets in
education, financial services, and entertainment. Zero-based design is
central to the development process of each of the social enterprises
I have founded. A concept parallel to zero-based budgeting, zero-based
design requires that you begin from scratch, without preconceptions
or existing models to guide you, beginning with your goal in mind.
My goal is always creating global enterprises that will attract and
transform the lives of at least 100 million customers while generating
$10 billion in annual sales within a decade.
I have found that one of the greatest impediments to achieving

the biggest challenge in developmentmeaningful scaleis the
high cost of delivering products and services, not just the last mile,
but the last 500 feet. Designing a branding and marketing strategy
and a last-mile supply chain that will put the product or service in
the hands of millions of customers is three-quarters of the design
challenge. For example, one of my enterprises was faced with the
challenge of profitably partnering with 3 million mom-and-pop
shops in small villages that each have a daily turnover of only $15 US.
By creating a partnership with these shops, we have been able to
create a widespread and culturally-compatible distribution system for
clean, safe drinking water. We are working toward achieving this goal
by taking advantage of radical decentralization, one of the keys to
building a large, transnational business capable of making headway
against global poverty while turning a generous profit.
Over all, a social enterprise must value both its employees and
its potential customers, extensively listening to their needs and
incorporating this information back into the design process. I have
299
seen this framework achieve success in practice in my own enterprises
and I encourage other bold entrepreneurs to do the same. We need to
change the way we approach development. We need to see the poor
as customers rather than as charity recipients.
Speaker
Adjunct Research Fellow at Western Sydney University,

Australia
Cristina Martinez is a global advisor on skills and employment

development, workforce development through knowledge intensive
activities, and TVET strategies for inclusive growth. She specializes
in new sources of employment growth and industry innovation in the
green economy. Currently, advising the Asian Development Bank (ADB),
Cristina Martinez
UNESCO, the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and national
governments in several countries, she holds an adjunct position at the
Urban Research Centre of the Western Sydney University. From 2008
to 2015 she held several positions at the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD). She was appointed advisor
of the Knowledge Sharing Alliance at the Secretary General Office
in 2014 where she was responsible for implementing the OECDs
knowledge sharing agenda with non-member countries through
leveraging the OECDs multi-disciplinary expertise. Previously she was
a Senior Policy Analyst at the OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs
and Local Development.
300
Summary
Technology and innovation for Inclusive and Green
Growth in the Post-2015 Agenda
Development cooperation in the Post-2015 framework requires
collaboration on an equal footing and co-production of solutions
between countries at all stages of development. Technology and
innovation capability are often associated with the high income
countries able to concentrate investment on creating the right
conditions for creativity and innovation to flourish in enterprises and
institutions. The assumption has been that a well-functioning Science
and Technology Innovation (STI) ecosystem needs to include elements
such as political stability, the right settings of skills and learning in the
labour market, strong research and education institutions, and a private
sector committed to research and development.
While this assumption is probably right, it also implies that countries

with lower and middle incomes might need to wait to have the
foundation elements before being able to fully benefit from strong
technology and innovation systems. The Post-2015 agenda departs
from some assumptions regarding the 'usual' development pathways
as a two sided dynamic developed and developing countries
towards an universal development approach recognizing that many
pressing concerns climate change, health, peace and stability- are
universal and can only be tackled by global collaboration and sharing
mechanisms. Applying and investing in STI for universal development
can involve: (1) addressing basic needs through innovation capacity;
(2) promoting entrepreneurship to enhance technological absorptive
capacity; and (3) building STI capabilities at all levels of skills in the
labour market to promote inclusive and green growth.
The deployment of strategies to accelerate technology absorption

capacity, at the same time that local knowledge and skills are
maximized, requires also the alignment of policies at the country
level in three interrelated areas: private sector development, skills and
employment and STI policy capacity. Aligning policies and promoting
horizontal cooperation and vertical integration across levels of
governments and different Ministries is one of the most difficult tasks
governments face; a knowledge sharing approach is needed over
time and beyond national policy cycles. At the same time, fostering
technology and innovation capacity stimulates entrepreneurial spirit
and boosts enterprise development, opening opportunities for trade
and development for low and middle-income countries. Knowledge
sharing of lower and middle income countries with higher income
301
countries will increase technology transfer and facilitate technology
absorption capacity.
The Post-2015 agenda needs to take stock of what has been achieved,
or not achieved, in relation to the MDGs over the last decade, and
it needs to provide a vision and commitments to resolve those issues
that are still unresolved: poverty, peace and security, food for all,
sustainable energy and access, eradication of pollution, access to
clean water, livable cities and decent quality jobs for all. STI policies
can make a difference in how skills development systems address all
these challenges in the developing countries. Ensuring that science
and engineering subjects are valued and encouraged in the education
system in both academic and secondary vocational education levels
needs innovative approaches in public policy outreach to attract
students, and particularly women, to science and engineering careers.
New careers in sustainability science to support the transition to
a greener economy provide an attractive setting for younger
generations to work in converging disciplines where physical and social
science interact. As we move towards decarbonization of the economy,
new occupational profiles will emerge, others will need to be refined
and subjects linked with the environment, water, climate change, food/
nutrition, hygiene/health, disaster prevention and energy will need to
be adjusted and strengthened with technologies that can accelerate
the transition and make it economically viable.
The presentation will discuss examples where technology and

innovation address inclusive development. One example will discuss
entrepreneurs approaches to inclusive development through green
technology deployment in India. The second example will discuss
innovative vocational and technical education approaches through
technological upgrading addressing the needs of target groups in
Uzbekistan.
302
Speaker
Professor of POSTECH, Republic of Korea
Soo Young Chang is a Professor of Industrial and Management Engineering

at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH). He received
his PhD degree in Industrial and Operations Engineering from the
University of Michigan in 1988. He is one of the founding members of
Christian Forum in Science and Technology (CFSE), Sharing and Technology
Soo Young Chang
Incorporated (STI) and the Scientists and Engineers without Borders (SEWB).
He is also a founding co-president of the Academic Society for Appropriate
Technology established in 2015. He participated in organizing several
local and international meetings for the promotion of the appropriate
technology (AT) and its practices. He is currently involved with multiple
projects under public as well as private initiatives. Some of them are aimed
at encouraging private corporations to use AT for their corporate social
responsibility (CSR) practices. He is actively involved with several projects in
various countries throughout the world including Laos, Mongol and Nepal.
Summary
The Zeitgeist of our time and the appropriate technology
Technology has been indeed the key driver that brought about the
unprecedented prosperity that we witness today throughout the world.
Each and every seemingly glorious victory of the modern technology,
however, has never been a swift one without casualty.
Our ecosystem suffers irreversible damages while the modern

technology ruthlessly exercises its indiscreet dominion over the
environment. The modern technology twists and turns our minds
while it revolutionizes our material wealth. It lures us to crave for the
satisfaction of the vanity of our soul while it caters to the bare necessity
of our flesh.
Potable water, food and energy are our bare necessities. Under the
303
predominant scheme of economic development of our time, these
necessities are often addressed by the modern technology deployed
in large scale, enabled by the financial investment in overwhelming
size. The financing in such a large scale often seriously undermines the
sovereignty of the people and the country in debt, by urging them
to have a rather reckless lifestyle of consuming the goods and services
produced by the investment, in an attempt to recover the due return
on the investment.
The Zeitgeist is the spirit of the time. It is an idea instilled into the minds
of majority due to a series of events of the time. It often comes as
a demand, or sometimes in the form of a solemn invitation to immediate
actions. An interesting aspect of the Zeitgeist is that it presents itself as
more of a dilemma rather than a doable task.
For example, when the Zeitgeist fell upon England as well as USA at
the time of the slavery, it clearly demanded the abolition of slavery.
But to many at that time, it was a dilemma. It seemed like a hard
choice between economic value versus the value of human equality.
The womens right movement demanding the womens equal right
seemed to be another hard choice. A choice between traditional value
versus the value of gender equality. Our history shows, however, that
the seemingly contradicting values in fact turned out to be achievable,
both at the same time, reinforcing each other rather than conflicting.
The Zeitgeist of our time also falls upon us with a mission seemingly
impossible. Green and sustainability versus efficiency and productivity.
Market capitalism versus state plan and control. Private pursuit of profit
versus creation of shared value. Corporate interests versus its social
responsibilities.
A numerous pioneering minds of our time are asserting that the

Zeitgeists call of our time can be answered in many creative ways.
Schumachers wisdom in the book small is beautiful. Giddens proposal
of the third way. The creative capitalism of Bill Gates. Jim Collins Genius
of End. Rifkins revolutionary idea of the zero marginal cost society
To name a few
In this list of great ideas, I think that I can add the Appropriate
Technology as a proper response to the call of the Zeitgeist of our time.
Despite all unlikeliness and seeming impossibility of its success, I think
the foundational ideas of the appropriate technology will prevail and
the humanity will benefit from them.
304
Session 4-3 : Global Cooperation, Research for All
Chair
President of Korea University, Republic of Korea
Jaeho Yeom earned his Ph.D. in political science at Stanford University

for his research on Japanese industrial policy for high technology.
He started to teach public administration at Korea University in 1990.
As visiting researcher at the Institute of Business Research of
Hitotsubashi University in Japan, he conducted research on the policy-
Jaeho Yeom
making process for semiconductors and the computer industry
implemented by the Ministry of International Trade & Industry in Japan.
He served as an expert member of the Korean Presidential Commission
of Science and Technology Policy and a board member of the Korea
Science and Engineering Foundation. He also served as President
of The Korean Association for Policy Studies in 2007 and President
of The Korean Association for Contemporary Japanese Studies in 2008.
Currently, he is Chairperson of the Policy Advisory Committee of the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He was Executive Vice President of Korea
University before being elected as President in March 2015.
Panelist
Chair of OECD/Global Science Forum, Japan
After graduating from the faculties of Engineering (Mechanical

Engineering) and Law(Political Science) at Keio University, Nagano
Hiroshi joined the current Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (MEXT) and dealt mainly with science and technology-
related policy issues. At MEXT, he functioned as director general for
Nagano Hiroshi
international affairs and then, finally headed up the National Institute
305
of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP) of MEXT. Then, he served
as Executive Director at the Japan Science and Technology Agency
(JST) and Professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
(GRIPS). He currently serves as Chair of the Global Science Forum (GSF)
of the OECD and adviser to the MEXT. From April 2015, he teaches at
Keio University.
Panelist
Emeritus Professor, Physics Department of Seoul National

University, Republic of Korea
Professor Dong-Pil Min is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board to

the UN Secretary General. He is a professor emeritus at Seoul National
University. He was appointed in 2011 to the ambassador-at-large of
the Republic of Korea for S&T international cooperation. Serving as
the chairman of Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and
Dong-Pil Min
Technology, he launched the Seoul Science and Technology Forum
aiming at building the platform and the network for appropriate
technology transfer and collaboration with developing countries.
He has served as Director General of the Korea Research Foundation,
and Chair of the Asian Nuclear Physics Association (ANPhA). He earned
a Ph. D. (1976) and Doctor of Science (1980) in theoretical physics from
the University of Paris. He received national medals for his contribution
to the progress of science and science education by Korean
government in 2012, by French government in 2010.
306
Speaker
Wolf Chair in International Affairs of The Ohio State

University, USA
Caroline S. Wagner is a faculty member at the John Glenn College

of Public Affairs, the Ohio State University and teaches public policy
and leadership. She holds the Milton A. and Roslyn Z. Wolf Chair
in International Affairs, and she serves as the Director of the Battelle
Center for Science & Technology Policy. Prior to joining Ohio State
Caroline S. Wagner
(2011), she has a 30 year career as a policy analyst working with and
for government. At The RAND Corporation (1994-2005), she served as
deputy to the director of the Science & Technology Policy Institute.
She has also served twice as a staff member for the United States
Congress, and as an analyst for the U.S. Department of State. She lived
and worked as a diplomat in Seoul, South Korea (1988-1990). She is
an elected member of the Council on Foreign Relations, and the
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
Summary
The Influences and Opportunities of the Global Network
of Science
Significant forces are shifting the organization of science, with the
biggest changes occurring in the collaborative reach of global science.
The features reorganizing science are: collaboration and teaming;
global linkages; and open data sharing. These features are altering how
scientists organize to conduct research, the methods by which they share
knowledge and outcomes, and the pathways by which knowledge
flows to users. As this reorganization occurs, many are affected, not least
those who fund and benefit from science, but also those who conduct
science. The forces are not nationally or policy driveninstead they
emerge from dynamics within science communications, organize within
and influence networks, and set the agenda for policy. The changes
set the stage for the future of economic competitiveness and science-
based development. This talk highlights these changes and discusses
their implications for global policy and governance.
307
Speaker
Vice-chancellor of Uppsala University, Sweden
Eva kesson is a professor of chemical physics. She completed her

undergraduate education in chemistry and her doctoral education
in physical chemistry at Ume University. During the years 2003-2008
she was Vice-Rector of Lund University with special responsibility
for undergraduate education and the Bologna Process. From 2009-
Eva kesson
2011 she was Deputy Vice-Chancellor of Lund University, with special
responsibility for basic and advanced level studies issues, quality work,
and related internationalization matters. She has primarily pursued
research in femtochemistry a field that makes use of ultrafast
spectroscopy to follow chemical reactions and dynamics on a time
scale of chemical bond making and braking. She has served on
numerous boards, for instance CSN (Central Board for Student Aid),
Kristianstad University College, SI, and the National Committee for
Chemistry. In June 2015, she was awarded an honorary doctorate from
the University of Edinburgh.
Summary
Innovation and research - a local perspective on global
challenges
In an increasingly globalized world, international research collaborations
are growing more important by the day. Sweden is a small country,
with a population of 9,6 million people, yet were known for our level
of innovation. Companies such as Volvo, Tetra Pak, Ericsson, Alfa Laval,
Scania and Skype are internationally renowned, yet they all began with
one innovative person in an environment conducive to innovation
who was able to find the right partners. Getting there where these
companies are today took cooperation, openness, the mixing of
knowledge from disparate sources, a willingness to consider the ideas
of others, and an ability to distil innovation into commercially viable
solutions.
In the academic world, the global perspective is all-pervasive. Nurturing
308
it is the essence of a university. An active exchange of knowledge
entails being open to the experiences of people from other countries
and cultures, sharing knowledge with others and working together
to progress it further. Mutual undertakings can guide us towards the
answers to questions directly related to the survival and prosperity of
mankind. Openness and shared goals are also essential stepping stones
to peace, to creating an arena conducive to global dialogue. That is
the great strength of the universities, that curiosity and the search for
knowledge render nationalism and self-interest irrelevant relics of the
past. Science diplomacy is also an increasingly important task of the
universities. By engaging in it, the universities can contribute to a better
and more peaceful world and shared planet.
Uppsala University was founded in 1477, and has a long tradition of

renewal, of adapting to changing times. The world needs universities
today, perhaps more than ever. They have the potential to be engines
of societal progress to an even greater extent than they are today. We
need to continuously stimulate and develop the free global flow of
thoughts and ideas. To do so, we must come together in collaboration,
and to remain curious of the findings and successes of others. Not
the least, this can be accomplished through student- and teacher
exchanges. New technology, brought to us by research findings,
enable us to interact virtually as well. Furthermore, the development
of advanced technology has also created near-boundless possibilities
for new findings in medicine and the natural sciences. New knowledge
is being produced at a rapid pace, and it is important to find the time
to conduct an ongoing discussion on the consequences of that same
knowledge to keep a dialogue on ethics going.
International collaboration is crucial to our shared future and for

us to meet many of the challenges we face today, including those
in healthcare and climate. We need to discuss which models and
structures of international collaboration most efficiently bolster
innovation for the world at large. The advanced technology of today
is also expensive, which makes academic exchange and collaboration
all that more important. At Uppsala University, we continue the
search for new knowledge, and endeavour to keep our doors open
to the world. We encourage interactions between students from
different countries, and do our utmost to prepare our students for an
international labour market and for their roles as important actors in
a globalized society.
The international contacts and experiences of teachers and students are
309
assets that raise the quality of education and research. The Universitys
researchers regularly publish articles co-authored by colleagues from
a large number of countries in every part of the world. That is the way to
cutting edge research and innovation today, as ones closest colleagues
often reside outside the immediate academic institution and country.
A few examples of previous and current international collaboration
at Uppsala University are presented, such as SACF, the Swedish
Academic Collaboration Forum, and TRAC, the Training and Research
Academic Center. As we enter a new phase of internationalization, the
importance of building networks and partnerships are highlighted, and
examples such as the research collaboration between Uppsala University
and Hallym University are held up as good practice in this area.
Speaker
President of The Research Council of Norway, Norway
Arvid Halln is Director-General of The Research Council of Norway.

He received his degree in sociology (mag.art). After an early career as
a researcher at the Institute for Social Research and the Norwegian
Institute for Urban and Regional Research (NIBR), he was appointed
Director-General at NIBR from 1987 to 1995. From 1995 and up to
Arvid Halln
present, he has been a member of the strategic leadership of The
Research Council of Norway. His first position was Division Director for
Culture and Society. In 2004 he was appointed director-general and
is currently in his second six-year term. He has a broad international
experience concerning research cooperation, participation in research
steering groups, international expert panels and policy bodies.
He was member of the Mid-term Evaluation Panel of the 7th Framework
Programme (FP7) and is currently member of the panel doing the ex-
post review of FP7. He has been member of the Governing Council of
Eurohorcs and of the European Science foundation and is currently
member of the governing board of science europe. He is elected
member of the norwegian academy of technological sciences NTVA.
310
Summary
Gendered Innovations
In medical research it is now common knowledge that not including
both sexes as research subjects may have disastrous consequences for
diagnostics and treatment. Yet, the diagnosis of heart disease still draws
heavily on research carried out using male patients and consequently
womens symptoms are often misdiagnosed, and the deleterious effects
of chemicals in the environment on reproductive health have also been
studied predominantly in men. Additionally, recent studies show that
the sex of experimental animals, and even cells, influence findings and
results. Including the sex/gender dimension is a question of excellence
in carrying out research and acknowledging the consequences.
To match the global reach of science and technology, the Gendered

Innovations project at Stanford University was developed, funded by
the European Commission, National Science Foundation, and Stanford
University. https://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/ The project
presents case studies and concrete illustrations of including sex/
gender analysis in science and technology. It demonstrates how this
can lead to new insight, cost savings for society and provide better and
sustainable solutions. In my talk I will give a few examples.
Innovation processes are dependent on a rich assortment of ideas

and perspectives to meet various needs. It is crucial that the research
community makes progress in acknowledging this for the sake of the
quality and relevance of research and innovation.
311
Special Session 1 : Talk Concert with Young Innovators
Chair
President of Science and Technology Policy Institute

(STEPI), Republic of Korea
Jong Guk Song has been the president of the Science and Technology
Policy Institute (STEPI) since 2011. His career as a researcher at STEPI
has spanned over two decades and also in government, science and
technology societies, universities and independent civil organizations.
Jong Guk Song He serves as a fellow for Fiscal Policy Advisory Committee (2015.4~
now), the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC, 2013.7 ~
now). He is a Creative Economy Selective Committee of the Federation
of Korean Industries (2013. 4 ~ now). He is the director at the
International Research and Training Center for Science and Technology
Strategy (CISTRAT, 2012.9 ~ now).
Prior to his recent occupations, he was an executive advisor of the

Education and Science Policy Division at the 18th Presidential Transition
Committee (2013.1 ~ 2013.2). He was the president of the Korean
Society for Technology Management and Economics (2010.3 ~ 2011.2)
and the Advisor to Minister of Science & Technology (1999.8 ~ 2001.2).
He holds a B.A. and M.A. in Economics from Sogang University and

Ph.D. in Economics from Texas A&M University.
312
Speaker
CEO of Woowa Brothers (Korean Food Delivery App,

Baedal Minjok), Republic of Korea
Bongjin Kim is a businessman and designer. He founded Woowa

Brothers Corporation in 2010 and operates Baedal Minjok, which is
the number one application to order foods online. He graduated
from Seoul Institute of the Arts and worked for Neowiz and Naver
as designer. After founding Woowa Brothers Corporation, he gained
Bongjin Kim
attention from business circles as he applied management to design.
Recently, he completed a masters program in Kookmin University.
His application Baedal Minjok brought innovation to online food order
and delivery. His unique management style and marketing skills gain
attention, too. He assumed various positions such as director of the
Korean Venture Business Association. In addition, he received various
awards including the Citation of the Minister of Knowledge Economy
and the Prime Minister Citation of the Korean Internet Award. He was
selected for the 20 Role Models for Young Entrepreneurs by Seoul
Venture Incubator and the 100 People Who Will Lead Korea in 10 Years.
Summary
A story about Baedal Minjok
Baedal Minjok caught public eyes last year. It was one of the most
popular applications last year. How was it developed and is it now
operated? It is evolving restlessly and its marketing strategy is very
unique. Lets listen to its CEO to know the company and its corporate
philosophy. His presentation will cover how the company has grown up
for the past 5 years since its foundation, and how the unique marketing
strategy was developed. Bongjin Kim will also present his effort to make
the company a great place to work.
313
Speaker
CEO of LOC & ALL (Driver Kim App), Republic of Korea
Won-Tae Kim is a founder (2010~) and co-CEO of LOC&ALL Inc. that

launched the Driver Kim (Kim-Gi-Sa), one of the most popular navigation
applications for smartphone users in Korea. Driver Kim has over 10 million
subscribers with 200 millions per month in the number of searches.
He graduated from Dong-a University and completed a masters
Won-Tae Kim
program in Busan National University with a major of GIS (Geographical
Information System). Before starting the LOC&ALL Inc., he was a co-
founder and a director of Point-I Inc. Including Kim, the members of the
Point-I Inc. succeeded in commercializing the worlds first mobile-based
navigation software K-Ways in 2004. In 2015, LOC&ALL Inc. and the app
Driver Kim were acquired by Daum Kakao for 62.6 billion won (KRW).
Based on Kims 15 years experience in LBS(Location based Service) field
and strategic investment by Daum Kakao, Driver Kim will offer the best
navigation service customized for different users and in different cities.
Summary
Challenge and Achievement of Navigation App,
Driver Kim
LOC&ALL Inc. and the application service 'Driver Kim (Kim-gi-sa) are
not upstarts in location based service and mobile-based navigation
application. For the success of LOC&ALL, Wontae Kim had experienced
business creation and its growth three times. His presentation will
cover how one of the most popular navigation application Driver Kim
was created and grown up for the past 5 years in Korea, and the story
of Japanese launch. In addition, he will also present his philosophy and
ideas to make good ecosystem for start-ups in Korea.
314
Speaker
Head of Google Campus Seoul, Republic of Korea
Jeffrey Lim is the Head of Campus Seoul, part of Google's global

network to support entrepreneurs. Jeffrey's vision for Campus Seoul
is to create an environment for Korean startups to grow and go global.
Jeffrey brings a wealth of experience in tech and startup industry
and passion for empowering young entrepreneurs. Prior to joining
Jeffrey Lim
Google, he founded and served as CEO of social gaming company
RocketOz, and invested in young companies as a venture capitalist
at SoftBank Ventures Korea. Jeffrey has also held senior leadership
positions in innovative tech startups in Silicon Valley. Jeffrey holds a M.S
in Management Science and Engineering from Stanford University, and
a M.S in Industrial Engineering from U.C.Berkeley. He earned his B.S in
Industrial Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and
Technology.
Summary
How Google helps startups and entrepreneurs grow
Google began in a garage nearly two decades ago and today it celebrates
its entrepreneurial roots. Google for Entrepreneurs (GFE) partners with
startup communities and builds Campuses where entrepreneurs can
learn, connect, and create companies that will change the world. Since
2011, GFE has launched Campuses and formed partnerships that support
entrepreneurs across 125 countries. Learn how GFE has made an impact
on over 100,000 entrepreneurs around the world.
315
Special Session 2 : Opening the future with Science,
Technology and Creativity
Chair
President of Korea Foundation for the Advancement

of Science and Creativity, Republic of Korea
Seunghwan Kim currently presides over the Korea Foundation for

the Advancement of Science and Creativity (KOFAC) and the Korean
Physical Society. He is also a professor of Physics at the Pohang
University of Science and Technology (POSTECH). Prior to his time at
KOFAC, he was the first Korean President to lead the Asia Pacific Center
Seunghwan Kim
for Theoretical Physics (APCTP). He received his doctoral degree in
physics from the University of Pennsylvania and his bachelors degree
in physics from the Seoul National University. He is the recipient of
numerous honors and awards, including the Scientist of the Year
awarded by the Korean Science Journalists Association in 2013. He has
published more than one hundred papers in SCI journals on nonlinear
dynamics, complex systems, and computational neuroscience.
Summary
Advancement of Science, Creative Education and Maker
Movement for the future
The world is entering into the era of the creative economy. During
such a time it is critical that personal creativity is merged with science
and produces a unique value. This means that, in a creative economy,
the relationship between science and the public is becoming far more
important than ever before.
The relationship between these two areas and the public takes on
a new aspect in a creative economy. The creative economy has
been bringing about major increases in civic participation through
initiatives such as the Maker Movement, in which personal creativity is
integrated with science and technology in order to create unique and
greater values. This new level of civic participation is deeply appreciated
316
as being a new source for restoring economic vitality in a society which
is struggling with social issues that are becoming increasingly more
complicated.
To help stabilize this new paradigm, the KOFAC is encouraging the

growth of a creator culture by doing such things as increasing the
supply of space for creative activities, and the infrastructure that such
activities require. The hope is that this will help individuals embody
their own creative ideas, while at the same time it enables the KOFAC
to fulfill its fundamental role as the major coordinator for this rising the
Maker Culture. With this in mind, the KOFAC is operating a nationwide
network of Maker Space. The main purpose of this network is
motivating individual to realize their ideas by making prototype and
help them further to progress into start-ups across the entire country. In
addition, KOFAC also engages in various other activities such as cultural
movement events, maker culture promotion, education campaigns,
maker education reinforcement, economic movement and supporting
idea start-ups.
The astounding economic growth achieved by South Korea in

within such a short period of time is credited to the nations focused
investment in science and technology. Korea has not spared
a single penny in building cutting edge scientific and technological
infrastructures, or nurturing the vital human resources, that these fields
require in order to succeed. Scientific cultural activities have also been
widely encouraged in an attempt to enhance public awareness and
acceptance of science and technology. All these have contributed to
the public awareness of scientific rationality as a worthy value within
a relatively short period of time.
Since its foundation, the Korea Foundation for the Advancement of

Science and Creativity (KOFAC) has been devoted to providing the
public with access to a wide range of diverse experimental scientific
activities, with the express goal of enhancing public understanding of
science. Recently, the KOFAC has been attempting to organize creativity
education geared for personal creativity and formulate creative culture.
To achieve these goals, the KOFAC is pursuing the STEAM education
as a means of motivating young people to take an active interest in
science and technology, and to expand their real-life problem solving
skills, as well as stimulating an experiment orientated, creativity focused,
education system for students to exercise their full-fledged dreams and
talents.
The KOFAC is also trying its efforts to enable business opportunities out
317
of the public participation to merge creativity and science/technology
into creation of new value. The KOFAC is providing cloud funding in
order to reinforce innovation and entrepreneurship while at the same
time reducing risks for innovators and entrepreneurs. Innovations led
by grass root prosumers small in size and yet great in number can
contribute to the long and fat tail of the new creative economy.
To create and make is an indispensible part of life. The KOFAC will

continue to extend support to student creators and makers engaged
in various activities designed to develop creativity and problem solving
capabilities. It is high time that these makers, with imagination and
creativity, be wedded to science and technology, and begin leading the
future for Korea.
318
Speaker
Director of National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, USA
Gregory S. Boebinger received Bachelors Degrees in Physics, Electrical

Engineering and Philosophy in 1981 from Purdue University. He
studied at Cambridge University as a Churchill Fellow, then entered the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he held Compton and
Hertz Foundation Fellowships. In 1987, he joined Bell Laboratories and
Gregory S. Boebinger
established a unique pulsed magnetic field facility for physics research
on semiconductors, f-electron compounds and superconductors in
magnetic fields more than one-million times the Earths magnetic field.
For this research, he was named a Fellow of the American Physical
Society in 1996. In 1998, he headed the pulsed magnet laboratory at
Los Alamos National Laboratory, one of three campuses of the National
High Magnetic Field Laboratory (MagLab). In 2004, he became director
of the MagLab. The MagLab is the world leading magnet laboratory,
used by 1400 scientists annually for research in physics, materials
science, chemistry, biology and biomedicine.
Summary
Leading By Getting Out of the Way
At the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (MagLab), we have
implemented several unusual organizational practices to promote
creativity in a modern research and development institution. Many
of these practices were born from more than ten years of research
experience at Bell Laboratories and almost twenty years of research
and management experience at the U.S. National High Magnetic Field
Laboratory.
The challenge of hiring creative workers has evolved into the

imperative of growing their creativity upon hiring. The traditional
pyramidal organizational chart while needed to track budget
and tackle administrative chores - works best for creativity when
decision making is pushed as far down the chart as possible. Indeed,
319
the organizational chart should be set aside altogether to liberate
the most creative researchers, to promote wide-open and unusual
communications channels, and to enable the serendipitous discoveries
that result. Public relations and advertising departments should be
tasked to draw on their traditional marketing skills to promote a web of
scientific communication within the organization.
The MagLabs research program spans research on Materials, Energy,

and Life. Advances in each of these research areas will be used to
illustrate the fruits of MagLab management practices.
In this creative environment, there is a critically important role

for institutional leadership that involves the tireless gathering of
information, the distillation of that information, the development
of a mixture of precise and diffuse institutional goals, and the
rallying of creativity to pursue those goals. Ultimately, the properly
balanced research and development organization are marked by two
characteristics: The institution serves its most creative individuals. And
managers lead by getting out of their way.
Speaker
Principal Associate Director at Los Alamos National

Laboratory, USA
Alan Bishop is an internationally recognized leader in theory, modeling

and simulation for condensed matter, statistical physics, and nonlinear
science. He has made major contributions in the areas of soliton
mathematics and applications, quantum complexity, structural and
magnetic transitions, and others. He was educated at the University
Alan Bishop
of East Anglia and the University of Cambridge where he earned
a doctorate degree in Theoretical Solid State Physics at the Cavendish
Laboratory. After postdoctoral periods at Oxford, Cornell, and teaching
at London Universities, he came to work at Los Alamos Scientific
Laboratory (LASL) in 1979 taking a staff position in the Materials and
Statistical Physics Theory Group of the Theoretical Division. He was
320
a founding member of the Los Alamos Center for Nonlinear Studies.
With the transition from the University of California to the Los Alamos
National Laboratory (LANL) on June 1 2006, Alan became the Associate
Director for Theory, Simulation, and Computation.
Summary
Opening the future with Science, Technology and
Creativity: A view through the prism of a premier National
Security Science Laboratory
The pace of technological change and the complexity of societal
imperatives are accelerating rapidly in this century. In this increasingly
data-democratic world, seamless and agile integration from scientific
innovation to impact is ever more essential for our security and
prosperity. We discuss this pressing need for creative scientific solutions
in the context of Los Alamos National Laboratory, a premier national
security science laboratory with more than 70 years of world-changing
science, technology, and engineering. To meet its difficult missions, Los
Alamos uses leading experimental, computational, and engineering
tools, and employs deliberate interdisciplinary scientific approaches
often resulting in breakthroughs for complex systems methodologies
and innovations at the frontiers of disciplines from biology to
cosmology. We emphasize the importance of workforce vitality
and excellent scientific infrastructure to nurture and apply strategic
capabilities and partnerships so that we can solve exciting scientific
and technological challenges.
321
Special Session 3 : Science Fiction Becoming Reality -
Space Resource Exploration
Chair
President of Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and

Building Technology, Republic of Korea
Tai Sik Lee currently serves as the President of the Korea Institute of Civil
Engineering and Building Technology (KICT), a government-sponsored
research institute responsible for establishing government policies
and performing R&D for construction industry. He has also served as
professor of the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department
Tai Sik Lee
at Hanyang University since 1994. As a researcher, he was one of the
pioneers who majored in construction management and introduced
this new field to Koreas engineering society and construction industry.
He has served for the president of numerous organizations such as the
Korean Society of Civil Engineers (KSCE), as well as serving as a member
of the National Academy of Engineering of Korea (NAEK). He is recently
vice president of the Korean Federation of Science and Technology
Societies (KOFST). He received his B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from
Seoul National University in Korea and continued on to receive both
his M.S. and Ph.D. in Construction Management at the University of
Wisconsin-Madison in the U.S.A.
322
Panelist
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building

Technology, Republic of Korea
Byung Chul Chang has joined the Korea Institute of Civil Engineering
and Building Technology space resource exploration team as a
researcher from 2015.
Prior to KICT, he was a researcher of Hanyang University. He participated

Byung Chul Chang Extreme Rough Terrain Exploration Rover research, and International
Space Exploration Research Institute both sponsored by the Korea
government. Currently is a secretary of Civil Engineering in Space
committee of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers.
He awarded 2010 ASCE Earth and Space Conference Best Student

Paper Award. Attended 2010 NASA ISRU Field Test as an international
guest, and participated 2012 NASA Lunabotics Mining Competition
as a team lead. Recently, Disintegration of Apollo lunar soil has been
published on the Nature Geoscience which he co-authored.
He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from Yonsei University, Korea,

his M.S. in Construction Management from Hanyang University, Korea,
and is a Ph.D. Candidate in Civil Engineering at Hanyang University.
323
Keynote Speaker
NASA Chief Technologist, USA
David Miller serves as chief technologist through an intergovernmental

personnel agreement with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
where he is the Jerome C. Hunsaker Professor in the Department of
Aeronautics and Astronautics. He was the Principal Investigator for the
Regolith X-ray Imaging Spectrometer for the OSIRIS-REx asteroid sample
David Miller
return mission, and a NASA Institute of Advanced Concepts fellow.
He also recently served as the Vice Chair of the Air Force Scientific
Advisory Board. He was the principal investigator for the Synchronized
Position, Hold, Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellites, or SPHERES,
project on the International Space Station. SPHERES are bowling-ball-
sized free-flying satellites that have been tested for various capabilities
on the ISS since 2006. He was also the co-principal investigator for the
Middeck Active Control Experiment, which was flown on STS-67 and
again on the International Space Station.
Summary
Our Next Destination in the Human Journey Beyond Earth
Dr. Miller will talk about NASA's journey to Mars and humanity's next
great migration into inter-planetary space in the search for life. His talk
will focus on life inhabiting the universe. Whether its NASAs science
or human exploration program, life and how it may have evolved
elsewhere and could evolve elsewhere is a central theme. As NASAs
Chief Technologist, it is his responsibility to help make that search
a reality. Technology drives exploration and provides the tools that
enable the engineers to build the missions that answer the ever more
challenging scientific questions about the existence of, and potential
for, life beyond Earth. In NASAs science and human exploration
programs, questions about life beyond Earth come together at Mars,
making it our next destination for human exploration beyond Earth.
324
Speaker
Principal Researcher, KIGAM, Republic of Korea
Kyeong Ja Kim has a PhD of Geology (Victoria University of Wellington)

and she is a principal researcher at Korea Institute of Geoscience and
Mineral Resources and a professor at the Department of Geophysical
Exploration of University of Science and Technology, Korea. She was
a visiting scientist at Planetary Science Branch, NASA/ARC. Prior to
Kyeong Ja Kim
KIGAM, and she was a staff assistant scientist served as a science team
member for Mars Odyssey Gamma Ray Spectrometer Program at the
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory of University of Arizona, USA. She
served as a Co-Investigator for Kaguya GRS and Co-Principal Investigator
for SELELNE-2 AXS pre-project. She serves as co-convener and science
committee member for AOGS and COSPAR for lunar science and lunar
exploration session. She is a foreign collaborator for NASA SSERVIs
FINESSE Project. She recently published Nuclear Planetology: Especially
Concerning the Moon and Mars in RAA and GIS-based geological
investigation using Kaguya elemental Information in ASR.
Summary
Koreas Prospects and Challenges in a New Era of
Planetary Exploration
With arrival at the Moon in 2007 and 2008, Eastern Asia has become
an important international player in lunar and planetary exploration.
The achievements of Japan, China and India provided not only
important new scientific insights but they also sent new impulses
which have stimulated visionary innovative research and technological
developments for future human exploration of our Solar System.
Technological advances will soon allow humans to travel to the Moon,
and beyond by using the Moon as stepping stone for even larger
leaps. In several years from now, the United States, Russia and also Asia
will visit the Moon again and will investigate utilization of resources
with the ultimate aim of building bases for human settlement and
outposts for exploration. Extraction of resources will be paramount
to respond to mankinds increasing demand on energy, in particular
for clean resources such as Helium-3 and also for Rare Earth Elements
325
and Uranium. Today, Korea is well prepared for its own national
technological developments to prepare for an international and
cooperative space resource mission. Dr. Kim will introduce Korean
research activities in lunar and planetary exploration and highlight
worldwide trend as well as future opportunities in the exploration of
planetary resources.
326
Transportation
Shuttle Bus
Shuttle Bus Stop
- Daejeon Convention Center (DCC) In front of DCC

- Daejeon Station In front of Gate 4, Daejeon Station
- Daejeon Government Complex Bus Stop In front of Intercity Bus Stop
(Arrival / Departure)
- Yousung Hotel / Hotel Riviera Yuseong In front of Hotel Riviera Yuseong
- Hotel Interciti In front of Hotel Interciti
Notice
- The schedule is subject to change depending on traffic conditions and the number of participants.
- Shuttle bus service for banquets is also provided to the hotels after the event.
Schedules
October 18.(Sun)
Daejeon Yousung Daejeon
Daejeon Government Hotel / Government
No DCC Hotel Interciti DCC
Station Complex Hotel Riviera Complex
(Arrival) Yuseong (Arrival)
1 09:30 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:40 10:53 11:00
2 10:00 10:30 10:45 11:00 11:10 11:23 11:30
3 11:30 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:40 12:53 13:00
4 12:00 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:10 13:23 13:30
5 13:00 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:10 14:23 14:30
6 14:30 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:40 15:53 16:00
7 15:10 15:40 15:55 16:10 16:20 16:33 16:40
8 16:00 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:10 17:23 17:30
9 17:00 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:10 18:23 18:30
10 18:00 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:10 19:23 19:30
11 19:00 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:10 20:23 20:30
12 20:00 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:10 21:23 21:30
13 21:00 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:10 22:23 22:30
14 22:00 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:10 23:23 23:30
15 23:00 23:30 23:45 24:00 24:10 24:23 24:30
327
October 19.(Sat)~21.(Wed)
Shuttle 1 (DCC Hotels)
Government Hotel / Government
Complex Hotel Riviera Complex
(Arrival) Yuseong (Departure)
1 07:10 07:30 07:50 08:05 08:20 08:30
2 07:20 07:40 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:40
3 07:30 07:50 08:10 08:25 08:40 08:50
4 09:00 09:15 09:30 09:40 09:53 10:00
5 10:00 10:15 10:30 10:40 10:53 11:00
6 11:00 11:15 11:30 11:40 11:53 12:00
7 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:40 12:53 13:00
8 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:25 13:38 13:45
9 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:40 13:53 14:00
10 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:40 14:53 15:00
11 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:40 15:53 16:00
12 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:40 16:53 17:00
13 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:40 17:53 18:00
14 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:10 18:23 18:30
15 18:00 18:20 18:40 18:55 19:10 19:20
16 18:30 18:50 19:10 19:25 19:40 19:50
17 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:40 19:53 20:00
18 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:40 20:53 21:00
Shuttle 2 (DCC Daejeon Station)

Daejeon Daejeon
No DCC DCC No DCC DCC
Station Station
1 07:20 08:00 08:40 10 14:40 15:10 15:40
2 07:50 08:30 09:10 11 16:00 16:30 17:00
3 08:20 09:00 09:40 12 17:00 17:30 18:00
4 09:10 09:40 10:10 13 17:50 18:30 19:10
5 10:00 10:30 11:00 14 18:20 19:00 19:40
6 11:00 11:30 12:00 15 19:00 19:30 20:00
7 12:00 12:30 13:00 16 19:30 20:00 20:30
8 12:30 13:00 13:30 17 20:00 20:30 21:00
9 14:00 14:30 15:00 18 20:30 21:00 21:30
328
October 22.(Tue)~23.(Fri)
Shuttle 1 (DCC Hotels)
Government Hotel / Government
Complex Hotel Riviera Complex
(Departure) Yuseong (Departure)
1 07:40 08:00 08:20 08:35 08:50 09:00
2 07:55 08:15 08:35 08:50 09:05 09:15
3 14:30 14:50 15:05 15:15 15:28 15:35
4 14:45 15:05 15:20 15:30 15:43 15:50
5 18:00 18:20 18:40 18:55 19:10 19:20
6 18:30 18:50 19:10 19:25 19:40 19:50
Shuttle 2 (DCC Daejeon Station)

Daejeon Daejeon
No DCC DCC No DCC DCC
Station Station
1 07:20 08:00 08:40 5 14:20 14:50 15:20
2 07:50 08:30 09:10 6 14:40 15:10 15:40
3 08:20 09:00 09:40 7 17:00 17:30 18:00
4 12:30 13:00 13:30
Others
Taxi
Route Travelling Time Fare
Daejeon Station DCC Approx. 20 min. Approx. KRW 9,000
Hotel(Interciti, Riviera, Yousung Hotel) DCC Approx. 25 min. Approx. KRW 12,000
Daejeon Government Complex DCC Approx. 25 min. Approx. KRW 12,000

* Call Taxi +82-42-638-8383(Hanbit) / +82-42-586-8000(Yangban) / +82-42-242-8800(Daejeon)
)
ae
gd
sun
Bus Line1
k (C
hil
ark
et) .)
c
iv.) niv
nseo n aleM nU
Ba nU les wo
- Bus Number 911, 121, 618, 705 k (C
hims
i
eu
h o
n W niv.) niv
., M
o k
Jijo (No atl

U IU
m at on
- Operating Hours N N
05:00-22:30 No
eu
n
up
diu
Sta Hanb
(
at
un
gn
am
lex
Da
eje
C n C h p
rld wo a( om
Wo hung Sp tC
- Price KRW 1,400 (Cash) yeo
nc
u seo
ng
e rnm
en
Y v
H Go
iv.)
)
ST ma Un
Subway Gu
am
pc
on
he (KAI Gal
Cit
y Ha
ll
song
Ga eong c
e ion
t oo
Sta (W
lpy uO g
g-g on -don
- Subway Line No. 1 Wo
Or
yo
ng
Jun Da
eje
Da
e
Line1
- Operating Hours 05:30-22:39 Tan

ba
ng
ng
mu
n
ne
geo
ri
ngn
o
he
g
un Univ
.)
Yo n ga Sin ejeon
ae
jeo Jun a
- Price Up to KRW 1,500 (Travel distance within 10 km) Se
od
Pa
nam
(D
329
Sponsoring Organizations
Daejeon Metropolitan City
Daejeon is located right in the center of the Korean peninsula. The city lies at the intersection of
multiple railways and highways, making it the center of transportation. Recently, Daejeon, along
with Sejong City, began acting as the second administrative capital of Korea, undertaking over 60%
of the central governments functions.
Daejeon has sister city relationships with 13 cities and it is home to the Secretariat of the World
Technopolis Association (WTA), an organization of 95 science cities from 47 countries. The citys
prominence as science city is recognized in not only Korea but the world.
+82-42-120 / http://www.daejeon.go.kr/dre/index.do
Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning [KISTEP]

As a government affiliated research institute under the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning,
KISTEP promotes innovation by supporting the full cycle of Koreas national R&D system. The major
roles of KISTEP include:
- Foresight and future strategies in S&T
- S&T policy planning and coordination
- Budget allocation and coordination of government R&D programs
- Evaluation of government R&D program performance
- Feasibility study on government R&D programs
- Global cooperation and collaboration
KISTEP contributes to economic growth and public welfare by providing in-depth and systematic
analysis of data, building strategic mid- to long-term plans, and offering effective and practical
solutions for policymaking.
+82-2-589-2200 / http://www.kistep.re.kr/en/
Science and Technology Policy Institute [STEPI]

STEPI is committed to becoming a global think tank in S&T policy research that leads the
advancement of science and technology for the sake of economic revitalization, increased quality
of life, and global prosperity.
STEPI is dedicated to developing national S&T policy and contributing to the advancement of
science and technology by carrying out research and analyses of S&T-related activities and other
relevant socioeconomic issues. STEPI is a think tank in S&T policy research that contributes to the
nations economic revival and the wellbeing of the Korean people by developing S&T policies that
encompass the people, society, and the spirit of the times.
+82-44-287-2000 / http://eng.stepi.re.kr/
National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF]

The NRF was founded on June, 2009, as a specialized research funding agency through a merger of the
Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF), the Korea Research Foundation (KRF), and the Korea
Foundation for Int. Cooperation of Science and Technology (KICOS). The aim of the NRF is to optimize
and advance the national basic research funding system that encompasses all academic research fields.
+82-42-869-6114 / http://www.nrf.re.kr/nrf_eng_cms/
330
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology [KAIST]
KAIST, founded in 1971, has gone beyond its initial mission for higher education and became a gateway
for innovative research in advanced science and technology. KAIST has grown into a globally recognized,
competitive institution that produces future leaders of the society.
KAIST was recently recognized to be among the top 10 most innovative universities by Reuters for its
engagement in various collaborations with neighboring institutions of academia and industry at the
heart of Daedeok Innopolis, the Korean Silicon Valley, to stimulate the creative economy exposing its
students early in their careers to an efficient and sustainable ecosystem for technology innovation.
+82-42-350-2114 / http://www.kaist.ac.kr/html/en/
DGIST
DGIST is a science and technology university, established in 2004 by the Korean government.
DGIST was first founded as a research institute and successfully expanded into a research-oriented
university by introducing graduate and undergraduate programs in 2011 and 2014 respectively.
DGIST focuses its research and education in six convergence areas: emerging materials science,
information and communication engineering, robotics engineering, energy systems engineering,
brain science, and new biology. DGIST has been providing the students with interdisciplinary
curriculum and striving to foster global talents with '3C' educational philosophies: Creativity,
Contribution, and Care.
+82-53-785-0114/ http://www.dgist.ac.kr/
Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology [GIST]

The Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST) is a government-sponsored research
institute with graduate and undergraduate level programs. Founded in 1993, GIST has pioneered
innovative research and educational initiatives, such as creating Korea's first liberal arts-based
collegiate science curriculum with extensive educational exchange programs with distinguished
universities around the world, such as Caltech, University of California at Berkeley, and Technion-
Israel Institute of Technology. GIST has grown to include eight world-class research institutes,
including the Nobel Research Center where four Nobel laureates continue to direct new research
related to their ground-breaking discoveries. At GIST, scientific knowledge and passion converge!
+82-62-715-2114 / http://www.gist.ac.kr/
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology [UNIST]

UNIST nestles in Ulsan Metropolitan City, an industrial powerhouse of South Korea. Established in
2009, has gained its visibility and recognition in outstanding research contributions in the field
of secondary batteries. In 2014, UNIST ranked 4th in NPI, a yardstick of research capability among
Korean institutes. UNIST successfully invited the Institute for Basic Science (IBS) to establish three
research centers, each of which will be funded with 10 million USD per year for 10 years by the
government. As a result, UNIST was relaunched as a government-funded research institute for
science and technology on September 28, 2015.
+82-52-217-0114/ http://www.unist.ac.kr/
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology [KRIBB]

Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), the central research organization
of bioscience and biotechnology, is the only bio-specialized government-funded research
institution that is carrying out advanced biotechnology researches such as medical health, food
production, bio-new material, a cleaner environment, and new energy development as well as basic
research for understanding the fundamental biology.
+82-42-860-4114 / http://www.kribb.re.kr/eng/main/main.jsp
Korea Brain Research Institute [KBRI]

KBRI is the only national brain research institute in Korea and establishes the best infrastructure to
lead Korea to the World Best Brain Research Nation. The research goal is to acquire new knowledge
to help prevent, detect, diagnosis, and treat brain diseases throughout the lifecycle.
+82-53-980-8114 / http://www.kbri.re.kr/pages/main/
331
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity [KOFAC]
KOFAC is a leading research institute affiliated with the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning,
established to advance and generalize public knowledge of science, encourage creativity and foster
talented individuals, thereby contributing to the development of science and technology.
For the last half-century, KOFAC has been the pioneering institution for the development of science
culture and creativity education.
KOFAC is currently focusing on 5 main areas: spreading science culture, nurturing creative talents,
promoting special education for gifted and talented children, offering math and science education,
and cultivating human resources. Also, KOFAC is contributing to national development by
promoting various programs such as Maker Culture that support the creative economy.
+82-2-559-3955 / https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1775
Korea Institute of Energy Research [KIER]

The Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER), a national research institute, has focused on the R&D in the
areas of energy efficiency, new and renewable energy, climate change, advanced materials, and marine
and offshore wind energy except for nuclear power. KIER is quoted, in Ministries report and press release,
as a R&D Hub for the six climate change mitigation technologies, taking role in bridging the industrial
needs with R&D institutes. Furthermore, in order to globalize the advanced technologies and promote
prosperity worldwide, KIER carries out collaborative partnerships with overseas entities through joint
R&D, technology transfer, knowledge sharing, and personnel exchange.
+82-42-860-3114 / http://new.kier.re.kr/eng/
Green Technology Center [GTC]

GTC is the only green technology think tank in Korea with policy development capability and
technology expertise. It aims to enhance green technology of the nation and also to plan and
support preemptive policy by responding closely to policy research needs and outlining direction of
future development for the nation. It is building global network for cooperation to help technology
of Korea become global standards and leader while contributing to mutual advancement of global
community with activities such as technology transfer to developing countries.
+82-2-3393-3900 / http://www.gtck.re.kr/frt/en/main.do
National IT Industry Promotion Agency [NIPA]

National IT Industry Promotion Agency (NIPA) is an agency founded to develop ICT industry of KOREA
and to promote diverse global projects on ICT.
+82-43-931-5000 / http://www.nipa.kr/eng/main.it
National Information Society Agency [NIA]

National Information Society Agency (NIA) is engaged in improving Koreas world-class ICT
infrastructure by building the high-speed information and communications infrastructure,
supporting establishment of e-government, and promoting application of new ICT. Also as the
supervisory institution for national informatization, it is carrying out its responsibilities of closing the
digital divide of both home and abroad, and establishing a healthy information culture. With the
mission of achieving the creative economy and citizens happiness through informatization, NIA will
continue to do its best to solve current national issues and allow the benefits of informatization to
reach each and every corner of the society.
+82-53-230-1114 / http://eng.nia.or.kr/english/eng_nia.asp
332
Korea Institute of Science and Technology [KIST]
Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) was established in 1966 as the premier multidisciplinary
research institute in Korea. Since then, KIST has continually been at the forefront of the national
development. KIST, domestically, has set the national think tank standards in the field of science and
technology, and many government-funded research institutes are modeled after KIST. The main campus
of KIST is located in Seoul, Korea with branch campuses in Gangneung and Jeonbuk. Its overseas
campus, KIST Europe, is located in Saarbruecken, Germany to facilitate collaboration with the European
community. KIST is on its way to becoming a leading global institute that contributes to the humanity by
creating the more convenient and prosperous future world.
+82-2-958-5114 / http://eng.kist.re.kr
Korea Internet & Security Agency [KISA]

Korea Internet & Security Agency (KISA) is the only Internet and information security promotion
organization in Korea that has an aim to improve the global competitiveness of Koreas Internet
industry as the ask of our time.
KISA has set 'Internet promotion' for the future and 'information security' for our safety as its primary
tasks and is focusing on enhancing the information security capacity of Korea's ICT industry and
expanding global cooperative partnership based on the K-ICT Security Development Strategy.
+82-2-405-5118 / http://www.kisa.or.kr/eng/main.jsp
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology [KICT]

The Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology is a government sponsored
research institute fully dedicated to developing construction technologies. The major activities of
KICT include comprehensive research on structures, geotechnical engineering, highways, water
resources, environment, architecture, fire safety, and management and certification of construction
quality. KICT has put most of its research efforts into developing cutting-edge technology for
safer and more convenient infrastructure, supporting government policy making and execution,
and providing the technologies needed to solve the problems that are experienced by private
construction companies.
+82-31-9100-283 / http://www.kict.re.kr/eng/
National Cancer Center [NCC]

The National Cancer Center, the only government-supported comprehensive cancer center in Korea, is
comprised of four sections, Research institute, Hospital, National Cancer Control Institute, and Graduate
School of Cancer Science and Policy. Each of which makes the anti-cancer drug development a
source of future national growth in Korea, renders the best quality care to cancer patients, serves as a
cancer control policy think-tank in an effort to reduce the national cancer burden and functions as an
educational and training hub for the next-generation cancer specialists.
+82-31-920-1934 / http://www.ncc.re.kr/indexEn.ncc
333
334
2
1-1
Challenge and
Response in STI
October 19, 2015
Youngah Park
President
Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning
Introduction of KISTEP
KISTEP, Key to Creative Innovation
As a global institute, KISTEP contributes to economic growth and public
welfare through strategic S&T planning and R&D evaluation
Create the
Lead the
national
Preemptively paradigm shift
growth
establish of R&D system
potential
future agendas through
based on the
and strategies creative
creative
innovation
economy
KISTEP is a government-funded institution under the Ministry

of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP) specializing in
S&T planning and evaluation
KISTEP provides the future vision, strategies and guidelines
for the entire national R&D system
2
337
Major Functions
338
STI Leads to World Prosperity
Technological progress led to explosive growth of

population and income
Source : World Bank (2010)
STI progress leads to explosive growth of population and income

5
Social and Global Challenges

Economic Recession Income Inequality Climate Injustice
Even though the world The recent increase in Underdeveloped countries that
recovered from huge income inequality reduces are not responsible to climate
recession caused by financial levels of trust and social change suffer from natural
crisis in 2008, its negative capital, and gives rise to disaster caused by it and
impacts on economic growth controversy on social they should also pay cost of
and uncertainty last system climate change in the future
<Change in World GDP, 07-13> <Gini coefficient,05-10> <Ave.CO2 Emission per Person>
Source : IMF (2013) Source : OECD (2014) Source : World Bank (2010)
6
339
Responses
Economic Growth Inclusive Growth Green Growth
Total-factor productivity, Inclusive innovation STI contributes the

a substantial part of which can transforms how our societies increase of carbon
be attributed to innovation, conduct business, creates productivity(GDP/CO2).
accounted for about 1/3 of new ideas, and responses for CO2 emissions increased
total GDP growth(over 0.7%p) social, technological and at a lower
between 1995 and 2013 environmental challenges rate than GDP
<Contributions to GDP growth> <3D printing from waste> <Carbon productivity>
Source : OECD (2015) Source : OECD(2014) Source : OECD (2014)
STI Leads to Economic Development in Korea
24000
21000
GDP per capita (constant 2005 US$)
18000 Difference in
output due to
15000 TFP growth or
knowledge
12000 accumulation
9000
6000
Difference in output
3000 due to growth in
labor and capital
0
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
Source : World Bank
340
Challenges in Korea
The rate of increase in GDP has The large technology trade deficit
slowed down recently due to low continues, which is related to
productivity, population aging, weak Catch-up strategy, frequent policy
domestic demand, etc. redesign, etc.
<GDP growth(%), 61-14> <Technology Trade Balance, 08-13>

14
12,038
12 11,052
10,234 9,901
10
8,438
8
6,846
5,670
6 5,311
4,032
4 3,582 3,345
2,530
2
0
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2014 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
5 years Ave. Export (A) Import (B)
Source : IMF Source : KOSTAT
Korea is shifting its economic paradigm to

the Creative Economy to overcome new challenges
9
Responses in Korea
The Creative Economy is all about creating new markets and jobs,
building on the creative ideas of economic players, which pursues
technological innovation as well as social innovation
Creativity Business Fair

Start-up competition
People New Ind.

Intellectual
Business Growth and Job
Property Manufacturing
Government Revival
S&T and ICT Technology Globalization

Convergence
For accelerating the creation of performance,

there should be thoughtful consideration about
governance & implementation, investment, and direction
in STI policy
10
341
Future Directions and Recommendations
Improving the governance and implementation of policies for STI

Prime mover : Bureaucrat Expert
Policy making : Redesign Continuity & Consistency & Consolidation
Policy evaluation : Quantity Quality & Quantity
Strengthening investment in STI and increasing the efficiency
11
Thank You!
ypark@kistep.re.kr
342
World Science & Technology Forum
Turki Bin Saud Bin Mohammed Al-Saud, PhD
President of King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST)
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
19 October 2015
343
1 2014 G 1435 AH
The development of the science,
technology, and innovation infrastructure
2 2019 G 1440 AH
Leadership in the field of science,
technology and innovation in the Middle
East.
3 2024 G 1445 AH
Access the ranks of developed Asian
countries in the field of science,
technology and innovation.
4 2029 G 1450 AH
Access to the ranks of industrialized countries
in the field of science, technology & innovation
344
Discover Deploy
Development Deliver
Discover
345
Development in Research Projects Support within the strategic technology programs
(2008-2014)
450 700
641.95
394
Number of Funded Projects
400
600
Total Funds (Million SR)

350 563.99 531.63
340 313 500 479.39
300 293
400 418.41
250
218 347.84
200 189 300
150
200
100
50 100
0 0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Years Years
346
Super computer SNAM" is
Communication and Robots and Intelligent one of the fastest Saudi Genome Project Nano-Catalyst to produce
Information Systems Systems computers in the world clean fuel
solar panels production Highly Concentrated

Solar Water desalination Wheat mutagenesis to
line with yearly 100 Solar Cell Systems High-speed & sensitive Nano-
(Khafji Project) develop resistance to salinity
megawatts energy devices
and low water consumption
Development
Technology
Technology Innovation
Center for Carbon Capture
& Sequestration
Technology Innovation Center

for Lighting and Energy
Rationalization
Technology Innovative
Center for Specialized
Personal Medicine
Technology
Center f Geographic
Information Systems
347
o Mega Technology Parks in the Kingdom to:
o National Center for Industrial Development
Promote smart innovation based on science,
technology, and industries in the targeted region
Support Intellectual property and inventors
Provide a mediator and a research environment for
Technology Transfer to support Saudi Industry research agencies and education centers and private
Quality Enhancement and Control industry in the region
Investing in local and regional knowledge sources to
o Incubation Program (BADIR) enhance regional and industrial base through smart
development.
o Mega Technology Park in the new Taif city is the first of
these Parks.
Badir Program 2015 2020 2025
Incubators Number (Cumulative) 20 40 80

Number of Clients per Incubator 280 560 1120
Number of Jobs in the incubated
2240 4480 8960
companies
Number of Companies 95 333 761
Number of Jobs in the
836 3596 9740
Graduated Companies
Total Number of Jobs 3076 8076 18700
Development
ICT Biotech AMI
Matches
BADIR High-Potential Incubatee Base
Jowain
Development
348
Startup weekend in KSA 2015 Statistics
BADIR has received 2470 applicants that

include designers, coders/engineers,
business developers and idea owners.
940 ideas were submitted from which 200
ideas pitched in the event and only 58
innovative ideas were voted to enter the
54-hour events.
The event was designed to provide superior
experiential education for technical and
non-technical entrepreneurs.
All Participated Startups
Development
Development
349
Services Leadership
Marketing Saudi innovations
to create global impact Growth and the entrepreneurship in
sectors that Saudi Arabia possesses
competitive advantages
Investments
Self-Reliance
Industries Increase self-reliance and control

for large government spending
Technology transfer of
sectors
strategic industries
Deploy
350
2nd National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation
1 2014 G 1435 AH
2 2019 G 1440 AH
3 2024 G 1445 AH
4 2030 G 1450 AH
The contribution of manufacturing to GDP

l
l Support products and services that are built in the

kingdom on techniques developed locally and are
globally competitive .
https://atlas.media.mit.edu/
351
https://atlas.media.mit.edu/
2nd National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation
o Support the infrastructure system for science, technology, and innovation.

o Promote the diversification of the national economy by linking research outputs with companies
towards industrial diversification (e.g. TAQNIA)
o Capacity building and contributing to the training of the younger generations for the labor market.
o Raise scientific awareness among society segments to facilitate the transition towards a knowledge-
based society.
A Basic research program

B Developmental research program
A B
C Flagship projects program
D Research & Development Tools Program
Programs
E Innovation tools & technology transfer program C
E
F Human Resources Program
Science, Technology and Society Program D
G
F
H Financial resources development program G
H
I Management and governance program
I
352
Deployment
Advanced Water Technologies
Energy Technologies
Deployment
353
Saudi Arabias Advanced Research Alliance
Deployment
l Lockheed Martin
l General Electric
l ANTONOV
l ABENGOA
Deployment
354
355
356
[billions USD]
1600 1,620 World
1400
1200 1,151
OECD
1000
800
CAGR : U.S. 5.1%, China 20.2%, Japan 3.7%, Germany 4.8%, Korea 9.6%
600
454 U.S.
400 405
China
200 Japan
Germany
Korea
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
[OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators] 1/ 18
[OECD Main Science and Technology Indicators]

2/ 18
357
[Korea Industrial Tech. Association]
3/ 18
358
U$206 bil
LED
OLED
13.4% Flat
CRT TV(1972) Panel TV
4.6% Flash
LEDTV (2008) 8.4% TFT LCD
Refrigerator (1974)
TFT LCD (1989) Mobile
Flat Panel TV (1998) 32.2%
Phone
Washing Machine (1974)

9.2% DRAM
Mobile phone (1989) NAND Flash (1994)
7.3% Refrigerator
U$16 bil
20.8% Others
DRAM (1983)
1985 1995 2005 2014

4/ 18
Korean Government R&D budget 17.8 bil USD
5/ 18
359
6/ 18
[ US Patent and Trademark Office ]
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
7/ 18
360
DRAM 40% TV 28%, UHD 34%
20nm process Quantum Dot
NAND Flash 37% Mobile/Smart Phone 22/25%
3D Vertical Curved, wireless charging
Solid State Drive 36% Refrigerator 17.5%
High speed, low power High efficiency/capacity
[ Display Search, Strategy Analytics, GFK/Traqline, IHS iSuppli ] 8 / 18
3years
?
?
9 / 18
361
Planar World 1st 3D Vertical NAND
24 stacks (13)
Cell-24
Cell-23
Cell-22
Cell-21
Cell-20
Cell-19
Cell-18
Cell-17
Cell-16
Cell-15
Cell-14
Cell-13
Cell-12
Cell-11
Cell-10
Cell-9
Cell-8
Cell-7
Cell-6
Cell-5
32 stacks (14)
Cell-4
Cell-3
48 stacks (15)
Cell-2
Cell-1
10 / 18
BT: Broadcasting Technology

DCI: Digital Cinema Initiatives
Cy 0.9
BT 2020
0.8 DCI-P3
0.7 sRGB
0.6
SUHD
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Cx
11 / 18
362
12 / 18
363
13 / 18
University professor Innovativeness USD $100,000 / year

Feasibility up to three years
Capability for feasibility study
2009 2015, 329 proposals selected and supported globally
14 / 18
364
Domestic Professors Global Experts SSTF
in Basic science
- New phenomenon 20-40 proposals/yr

- Disruptive theory ~1 mil.USD/project/yr
- New concepts (~5years)
15 / 18
- Clustering top-tier univ. in emerging area

- 2~3 mil. USD/year, 5 years
Neuromorphic Processor / Deep Learning / Metaphotonics / Stretchable Electronics / Battery Material

16 / 18
365
17 / 18
18 / 18
366
367

Our most important innovation is the way we work
Innovation for Impact

Learn fast to dramatically improve innovative
performance
Curtis R. Carlson, Ph.D.
Founder and CEO Practice of Innovation
President and CEO SRI International: 19982014
Email: curt@practiceofinnovation.com
Website: www.practiceofinnovation.com
October 19, 2015
Copyright 2015 The Practice of Innovation Curtis R. Carlson Not to be copied or distributed in any form without written permission PoI
World-Changing Innovations
$18 B $5 B $30-50 B
2 Copyright 2015 The Practice of Innovation Curtis R. Carlson Not to be copied or distributed in any form without written permission PoI
368
Global Innovation Economy
Exponential progress
Intense competition
New business
models
Endless
opportunities
Big Companies Are Dying

Faster
Lifetime in years
Year
369
Poor Performance
Government Programs Lagging
Government labs
New company
grants
R&D agencies
370
Innovation is a Mystery to Most
"Every CEO will at least give lip service
to the idea that the world is moving
faster and that we need to do a better
job at innovation.
But if you go into an organization and

ask people to describe their innovation
system, you get blank looks.
They have none."

Gary Hamel: Harvard University
Many Bad Ideas
Fail fast to succeed early
Learn fast to succeed early
371
Definition of Innovation
Creation and delivery of new

customer value in the
marketplace with a sustainable
business model
Value Creation is Learning &

Creating
3
Make a Start over
profit and
impact Innovation
Important need 2
Value
Value
creation
R&D 1
Time
372
Most
Most Value Creation
Innovations
Failures Happen Steps
Fail at theat
Start
the
Start
Deep understanding of the market ecosystem

TQM
Important customer and market need
Key insights: what has prevented solving it?
Cost
Working hypotheses: solution and business model

Competitive advantage: your 2-10X wow factor
Most
De-risk
failures
NABC Value Proposition Full business

Newconcept
New product Design Development Production
Rapidor iteration
service plan $; maximum value
minimum
R&D
18 Copyright
Copyright 2015 2015 The P ractice
The Practice of Innovation Curtis
of Innovation Cur tisR.R.Carlson
Carlson Not
Nottotobe
becopied
copiedor distribut ed in anyinform
or distributed anywithout written permission
form without written permission PoI
Innovation Fundamentals
Important global opportunity
2-10X better solution with business model
Value-creation process
Few barriers or bureaucracy
Best team total commitment Top 10 Business
Book of the Year!
Complete innovation ecosystem
Supportive government policies
373
Value-Creation Is a Discipline
Innovation is not the result of luck or a lone
genius
Family of learning, value creation, and
innovation practices a playbook for staff
A competitive advantage
Important to staff
Concepts seem easythey are not!
Definition of a Value Proposition
Important Need
Approach
Benefits/costs
Competition or alternatives
374
Almost All Presentations
N A
Copyright 2015 The Practice of Innovation Curtis R. Carlson
B/$ C
Not to be copied or distributed in any form without written permission PoI
Value Creation Forums: Learn

Fast
Brainstorming doesnt work

Team feedback is the exponential amplifier
Value-Creation Forums never stop
375
Example: Augmented Mobility
1. Important need 4. Solution: wearable pants
2. Key insight:
exoskeletons are heavy,
restraining, and power
hungry
3. Working hypothesis
Example: Formation of Siri
CALO R&D
project
NABC Value Propositions
376
Excellent Govt, Academia
Models
~ 1,500 U.S. incubators

Value
NSF:
Most Creation
Creating
Innovations Steps
Fail Bigger
at the Start
Innovations
Deep understanding of the market ecosystem

TQM
Important customer and market need
Key insights: what has prevented solving it?
Cost
Working hypotheses: solution and business model

Competitive advantage: your 2-10X wow factor
Most
De-risk
failures
NABC Value Proposition Full business

Newconcept
New product Design Development Production
Rapidor iteration
service plan $; maximum value
minimum
R&D
18 Copyright
Copyright 2015 2015 The P ractice
The Practice of Innovation Curtis
of Innovation Cur tisR.R.Carlson
Carlson Not
Nottotobe
becopied
copiedor distribut ed in anyinform
or distributed anywithout written permission
form without written permission PoI
377
Innovation Fundamentals
Important global opportunity
2-10X better solution with business model
Value-creation process
Few barriers or bureaucracy
Best team total commitment Top 10 Business
Book of the Year!
Complete innovation ecosystem
Supportive government policies

Our most important innovation is the way we work
Thank You: Discussion
378

Science Technology Polocies in Korea

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Science Technology Polocies in Korea

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2016-072

(innovation system) (system innovation)

(niches), (regime), (landscape)

(subcontracting) (cross licensing) (cross-fertilization)

- (win-lose) - (win-win) - (win more-win)

(value chain) (value network) (value constellation)

() (Creating Our Common Future through

Track 1 Track 2 Track 3 Track 4

10.19 () 10.20 () 10.21() 10.22() 10.23()

OECD (OECD Innovation Strategy)' OECD

. 1 :National System of STI

(1) 1-1 : STI Policy and R&D

(3) 1-3 : Science Education, HRD

. 2 :National System of STI

(1) 2-1 : Toward Personalized & Precision Medicine

(2) 2-2 : Next Generation Energy R&D Strategy

. 3 : STI for the Creative Economy

(1) 3-1 : Innovation Platforms

(2) 3-2 : Smart Manufacturing

(3) 3-3 : Convergence with the Arts, Cultures and Humanities

, , TV, , (city renovation)

(1) 4-1 : Climate Change & Environment

(2) 4-2 : S&T Global Cohesion

(3) 4-3 : Global Cooperation, Research for All

. OECD (Committee for S&T Policy, CSTP)

. (National Innovation System, NIS)

(National Innovation System) (Freeman, 1987)

creating and changing

formation of new product

R&D (provision of R&D)

(formation of new product markets)

(creation and change of organizations)

upstream focus on knowledge production and consumption/use

focus on improving the functioning of existing

acknowledgement of different interests, strategy,

methodologically advanced (indicators, methodologically open (new topic and intrinsically

OECD (DSTI) (STP) 2008 10

NHN SDS (spin-off)

(1) (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs)

13) Hamilton (2004)

Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) 14)

15) +20 1992 () 20

1. (end poverty in all its forms everywhere)

(Sustainable Consumption and Production, SCP)17)

17) (2013) (2012)

2012 (Rio+20) SDGs 1 2030

Post-2015 UN (Scientific Advisory Board of

19) UNESCO (2015)

(2) (Next Production Revolution)21)

21) OECD (2015a)

22) OECD (2013c)

KBC GVCs , KBC GVCs

(Heading for the Next Production Revolution)

meeting the infrastructure challenges

(intellectual property, IP)

(tailoring innovation policies)

(how to approach transition when economies

. 26) (OECD 2013d)27)

26) (Open Science) , (OA : Open Access Publishing),

(3) OECD 32)

36) OECD (2014a).

CGIAR(Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research)

(National Science Board) R&D

(USAID) (U.S. Global Development Lab)

15 K 16 ^> 17 WZ 18 ^^