Final Eval

4/23/2017 Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument
Responses About You - Details - "Level II Fieldwork Evaluation - Mid-term"

Print
2 of 2 2
Evaluation by: Fieldwork Educators (Hyde, Jonathan)

Evaluation of: Students (Stemmler, Brianna)
Evaluation Period: 3/23/2017
Survey Completed: 3/23/2017 10:08:28 AM ET
IMPORTANT:Please mark whether this is the Midterm or Final evaluation of your student. Additionally, please keep whether this is a Midterm or Final evaluation in
mind as you completethe rest of this evaluation.
NOTE: At the end of this evaluation, you will be asked to provide a total score for your student. Itwill be helpful to keep track of the points you give your student on
a spare piece of paper or on a calculatoras you ll-out the evaluation.
No response
Please complete the following:
Name of Student (Last, First, Middle) - Stemmler, Brianna

College or University of Student - Sacred Heart
Name of Organization/Facility - Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Address - 330 Brookline Ave
City - Boston
State - MA
Zip - 02215
Type of Fieldwork - Psychosocial
Order of Placement (Options: 1, 2, 3, 4) out of (Options: 1, 2, 3, 4) - 1 out of 2
Dates of Placement - 1/3/17 - 3/24/17
Number of Hours Completed - 480
Number of Persons Contributing to this Report - 1
Name of Rater #1 - Jonathan Hyde, MS, OTR/L
Name of Rater #2 (if applicable) - No response
https://www.typhongroup.net/eval/analyze/studentdetails.asp?facility=9283&survey=38889&r=2589688&msgtext= 1/8
I. FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:
All items in this area must be scored at a #3 or above on the nal evaluation in order to pass eldwork.
RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE
4 Exceeds Standards: Performance is highly skilled and self-initiated. This rating is rarely given and would represent the top 5% of all the students you have
supervised.
3 Meets Standards: Performance is consistent with entry-level practice. This rating is infrequently given at midterm and is a strong rating at nal.
2 Needs Improvement: Performance is progressing but still needs improvement for entry-level practice. This is a realistic rating of performance at midterm, and
some ratings of 2 may be reasonable at the nal.
1 Unsatisfactory: Performance is below standards and requires development for entry-level practice. This rating is given when there is a concern about
performance.
Adheres to ethics: Adheres consistently to the American Occupational Therapy Association Code of Ethics and sites policies and procedures
including, when relevant, those related to human subject research. - 3[3 pts]
Adheres to safety regulations: Adheres consistently to safety regulations. Anticipates potentially hazardous situations and takes steps to
prevent accidents. - 4[4 pts]
Uses judgement in safety: Uses sound judgement in regard to safety of self and others during all eldwork-related activities. - 4[4 pts]
MEAN: 3.67 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 11, % SCORE: 91.7%
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:
Brianna demonstrated good adherence to the code of ethics and safety policies throughout her a liation. She showed good awareness and
judgment regarding safety.
II.BASIC TENETS:
supervised.
performance.
Clearly and con dently articulates the values and beliefs of the occupational therapy profession to clients, families, signi cant others,
colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 3[3 pts]
Clearly, con dently, and accurately articulates the value of occupation as a method and desired outcome of occupational therapy to clients,
families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 3[3 pts]
Clearly, con dently, and accurately communicates the roles of the occupational therapist and occupational therapy assistant to clients,
families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the public. - 3[3 pts]
Collaborates with client, family, and signi cant others throughout the occupational therapy process. - 4[4 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in BASIC TENENTS:
Brianna demonstrated a signi cant increase in her understanding of the role of Occupational Therapy in inpatient acute psychiatry. She also
showed excellent skill in establishing collaborative relationships with patient and colleagues, re ecting the core values of Occupational
Therapy. She also made substantial improvements in educating patients and staff regarding the role and values of Occupational Therapy.
III. EVALUATION AND SCREENING:
supervised.
performance.
Articulates a clear and logical rationale for the evaluation process. - 3[3 pts]
Selects relevant screening and assessment methods while considering such factors as clients priorities, context(s), theories, and evidence-
based practice. - 3[3 pts]
Determines clients occupational pro le and performance through appropriate assessment methods. - 3[3 pts]
Assesses client factors and context(s) that support or hinder occupational performance. - 3[3 pts]
Obtains su cient and necessary information from relevant resources such as client, families, signi cant others, service providers, and records
prior to and during the evaluation process. - 4[4 pts]
Administers assessments in a uniform manner to ensure ndings are valid and reliable. - 3[3 pts]
Adjusts/modi es the assessment procedures based on clients needs, behaviors, and culture. - 3[3 pts]
Interprets evaluation results to determine clients occupational performance strengths and challenges. - 3[3 pts]
Establishes an accurate and appropriate plan based on the evaluation results, through integrating multiple factors such as clients priorities,
context(s), theories, and evidence-based practice. - 3[3 pts]
Documents the results of the evaluation process that demonstrates objective measurement of clients occupational performance. - 3[3 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in EVALUATION AND SCREENING:
Brianna utilized initial evaluations, standardized assessment such as the Allen Cognitive Levels Screen ACLS) and the Occupational Therapy
Assessment of Performance and Support (OTAPS), and multiple sources to obtain patient data. She demonstrated signi cant improvement in
interpreting the collected data and effectively utilized this information to provide patient-centered treatment interventions. She also showed skill
in identifying patients strengths to facilitate progress in treatment.
IV. INTERVENTION:
supervised.
performance.
Articulates a clear and logical rationale for the evaluation process. - 3[3 pts]
Utilizes evidence from published research and relevant resources to make informed intervention decisions. - 3[3 pts]
Chooses occupations that motivate and challenge clients. - 3[3 pts]
Selects relevant occupations to facilitate clients meeting established goals. - 3[3 pts]
Implements intervention plans that are client centered. - 3[3 pts]
Implements intervention plans that are occupation-based. - 3[3 pts]
Modi es task approach, occupations, and the environment to maximize client performance. - 4[4 pts]
Updates, modi es, or terminates the intervention plan based upon careful monitoring of the clients status. - 4[4 pts]
Documents clients response to services in a manner that demonstrates the e cacy of interventions. - 3[3 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in INTERVENTION:
Brianna consistently utilized her strong clinical observation skills to provide patient-centered treatment, and demonstrated good exibility in a
challenging work environment. She demonstrated improvements in articulating goals/purposes of interventions, individualizing interventions to
focus on speci c de cits/needs, and in therapeutic limit-setting.
V. MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:
supervised.
performance.
Demonstrates through practice or discussion the ability to assign appropriate responsibilities to the to the occupational therapy assistant and
occupational therapy aide. - 3[3 pts]
Demonstrates through practice or discussion the ability to actively collaborate with the occupational therapy assistant. - 4[4 pts]
Demonstrates understanding of the costs and funding related to occupational therapy services at this site. - 3[3 pts]
Accomplishes organizational goals by establishing priorities, developing strategies, and meeting deadlines. - 3[3 pts]
Produces the volume of work required in the expected time frame. - 4[4 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:
Brianna consistently fostered a cohesive, collaborative relationship with fellow Occupational Therapy students and colleagues. She also
assisted in orienting Level I Occupational Therapy students. She demonstrated good time management and steadily increased her work load
re ecting the ability of an entry-level Occupational Therapist. She showed good initiative in assisting patients in establishing and meeting goals.
VI. COMMUNICATION:
supervised.
performance.
Clearly and effectively communicates verbally and nonverbally with clients, families, signi cant others, colleagues, service providers, and the
public. - 4[4 pts]
Produces clear and accurate documentation according to site requirements. - 3[3 pts]
All written communication is legible, using proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. - 3[3 pts]
Uses language appropriate to the recipient of the information, including but not limited to funding agencies and regulatory agencies. - 3[3
pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvements in COMMUNICATION:
Briannas effective communication with patients and colleagues is one of her major strengths. Showed maturity in her interactions and
increased assertiveness when voicing clinical observations and concerns to the multidisciplinary treatment teams. Her documentation was
clear, concise and well-written.
VII. PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:
supervised.
performance.
Collaborates with supervisor(s) to maximize the learning experience. - 3[3 pts]

Takes responsibility for attaining professional competence by seeking out learning opportunities and interactions with supervisor(s) and
others. - 3[3 pts]
Responds constructively to feedback. - 4[4 pts]
Demonstrates consistent work behaviors including initiative, preparedness, dependability, and work site maintenance. - 4[4 pts]
Demonstrates effective time management. - 4[4 pts]
Demonstrates positive interpersonal skills including but not limited to cooperation, exibility, tact, and empathy. - 3[3 pts]
Demonstrates respect for diversity factors of others including but not limited to socio-cultural, socioeconomic, spiritual, and lifestyle choices. -
4[4 pts]
Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:
Brianna consistently provided a positive representation of Occupational Therapy through exceptional professional behavior. She routinely
demonstrated reliability, competence, and an eagerness to learn. She developed a high level of autonomy, but continues to utilize feedback
effectively. She showed outstanding time management skills. Brianna consistently showed a strong sense of empathy and respect, which was
pervasive in her work.
Please add up your student's total number of points (for MIDTERM andFINAL)and provide a pass or no pass rating (for FINAL ONLY)based on the following scoring
guidelines:

OVERALL MIDTERM SCORE
Satisfactory Performance..........90 and above
Unsatisfactory Performance......89 and below
OVERALL FINAL SCORE
Pass................................................122 points and above
No Pass..........................................121 points and below

Total Score - 139
Pass or No Pass - No response
SUMMARY COMMENTS:
(ADDRESS STUDENT"S OVERALL CLINICAL COMPETENCE)
Brianna successfully completed a 12 week Level II a liation on our locked acute adult psychiatric unit. She completed an average of 1-2 initial
evaluations per day. She facilitated or co-facilitated an average of 8-10 groups per week including: psychoeducation, sensory modulation, yoga,
and structured and therapeutic activities. She also collaborated in multidisciplinary treatment team meetings, presented a case study,
participated in student discussions, and implemented individualized treatment interventions. Brianna is an exceptional student, and was a
pleasure to supervise. Her strong sense of professionalism, respect, and empathy was pervasive in her work. Among her many attributes are
intelligence, reliability, exibility, good observational skills, diligence, and a solid work ethic. Her consistent utilization of these skills was
re ected in her strong performance in evaluation and treatment implementation. She demonstrated a strong sense of empathy and
compassion which enabled her to build positive rapport with patients and colleagues. Brianna's motivation, time management skills, and ability
to learn new skills quickly enabled her to provide clear, and thorough clinical documentation. Most notable, Brianna consistently demonstrated a
positive attitude and enthusiasm to learn and grow as a therapist. These attributes, as well as initiative and autonomy, will serve her well. She
will be a valuable asset to any treatment team.
Electronic Signature Status of Reviewer:
Signature Validated
No additional comments
Total points for all rating scale questions: 139

Mean percentage score for all rating scale questions: 83.8%
(Each main question equally weighted)
Responses as of 4/23/2017 9:11:25 PM ET

Final Eval

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Eval

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4/23/2017 Typhon Group: EASI - Evaluation & Survey Instrument

Responses About You - Details - "Level II Fieldwork Evaluation - Mid-term"

Evaluation by: Fieldwork Educators (Hyde, Jonathan)

Please complete the following:

Name of Student (Last, First, Middle) - Stemmler, Brianna

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.67 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 11, % SCORE: 91.7%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in FUNDAMENTALS OF PRACTICE:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.25 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 13, % SCORE: 81.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in BASIC TENENTS:

III. EVALUATION AND SCREENING:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.10 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 31, % SCORE: 77.5%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in EVALUATION AND SCREENING:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in INTERVENTION:

V. MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SERVICES:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.40 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 17, % SCORE: 85.0%

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

MEAN: 3.25 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 13, % SCORE: 81.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvements in COMMUNICATION:

VII. PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:

RATING SCALE FOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Collaborates with supervisor(s) to maximize the learning experience. - 3[3 pts]

MEAN: 3.57 (out of possible 4), POINTS: 25, % SCORE: 89.3%

Comments on strengths and areas for improvement in PROFESSIONAL BEHAVIORS:

OVERALL MIDTERM SCORE

Satisfactory Performance..........90 and above

Unsatisfactory Performance......89 and below

OVERALL FINAL SCORE

Pass................................................122 points and above

No Pass..........................................121 points and below

(ADDRESS STUDENT"S OVERALL CLINICAL COMPETENCE)

Electronic Signature Status of Reviewer:

Total points for all rating scale questions: 139

Responses as of 4/23/2017 9:11:25 PM ET

You might also like