Pato * NICU INSTRUCTOR'S REVIEW OF STUDENT'S VIDEOTAPE stuvenrname_Acf fa, TARR ACTED BvAsEesson . vate orreview_ OS [64 [20\b i) bn) ouyt wowtatid 4 wales INTERN'S SESSION STRENGTHS (What you di well, What you are proud o} ee Quer [ions “ usted t giving psycheectivca we og, ieadus let Hel pepiess hele true thous ou Hore ee INTERNS NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT (What did not go well?) We seme Uclraker (2h Just dude im oe sveel act) 2 he lowe vo will afake yaw? ae bof gett Co \puow thet 15 Me yeah que sepioyl, Yer prelte br ase tue fopae oa ashi She nal ge FEEDBACK AND RECOMMENDATIONS uth «au stead of Crentiug ydhiasleinyg Qusstimns 5 anus ype rh olpa mits, use aber Hel] slaash +0 wep Ae HA Seg.Tahiwalip ce NJCU INSTRUCTOR'S REVIEW OF STUDENT’S VIDEOTAPE STUDENT NAME _ Alfa REVIEW #_1. DATE/TIME___10/20/16_(10/19 session, which was their 3" session) INTERN’S SESSION STRENGTHS (What you did well. What you are proud of): Great rapport (client did most of the talking) ~ Genuine, accepting - Listening skills ~ Targeted, relevant and open-ended questions ~ _ Refleotion back to past session on coping skills and reminding her what she can do ~ Gently called client out for not using coping skills previously discussed, without any judgement - Good affirmations to support client (commending client for saying she'll put it in her calendar) - _ Feelings check in after client mentioned yelling = Fully present in session INTERNS NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT (What did not go well?) Inquire about potential resistance to homework (second week not completed) ‘You mentioned your session needing more structure. The flow seemed very natural and appropriate. From a structure standpoint, maybe prep some items to discuss in case she continues to have difficulty using the previously discussed coping skills and/or completing homework. Go with your gut regarding seeing how receiving the poor grade made her feel and what she might have been able to do to secure a better outcome. FEEDBACK AND RECOMMENDATIONS Look for / point out potential signs of resistance (homework, coping skills) should she not be following through with these items, Can use ‘I wonder’ statements to gain more information. May need to revisit coping skills to see if she can generate some on her own for increased buy in and ones she may be more confident she can execute (wondering if there were any skills she used in the past which she found successful). Point out positives she may not be aware of (e.g. claimed to have bad relationship with mom but mom ‘was able to help the situation at work and seemingly reduce her anger. Possibly tap into support system she may have been unaware existed.). Reflect on foelings/content to lend to insight (e.g, seems like you saying “hello” to the teacher was your way of apologizing. Scems like you were really concemed about your paycheck and ended up being rude to boss and customers. Role play may be helpful (and switching roles). CBT may help her to identify any unhelpful thoughts, ete.Student Name: Alfa Rodriguez Dtiwohp TE Date of Review: 3/29/17 Practicum/Internship Video Taping Grading Rubric Directions: Supervisor of the student counselor circles a rating for each item and as much as possible provides remarks that will help the student counselor in his or her development. Specific Criteria Rating (Best to Least) Remarks Skill Areas 5 4 3 2 Fy N/A Feedback ‘Opening: Was opening unstructured, friendly, and pleasant? Any role definition needed? Any introduction necessary? Structured-Checked in with members Rapport: Did student counselor establish good rapport with client? Was the stage set for a productive interview? ‘Counselor established strong rapport with group members Interview Responsibility: If not assumed by the client, did student counselor assume appropriate level of responsibility for interview conduct? Did student counselor or client take initiative? ‘Counselor assumed appropriate responsibility and allowed members to take lead Interaction: Were the client and the student counselor Communication was quite x really communicating in a meaningful manner? meaningful ‘Acceptance/permissiveness: Was the student counselor | x Counselor was accepting of accepting and permissive of client’s emotions, feelings, and member's emotions, expressed thoughts? feelings and expressed thoughts Reflection of feelings: Did student counselor reflect and x Counselor reflected react to feelings, or did interview remain on an intellectual members feelings and level? acknowledged their a struggles ‘Student counselor responses: Were student counselor = Counselor responses were responses appropriate in view of what the client was appropriate expressing, or were responses concerned with trivia and minutia? Meaningful questions? Value management: How did student counselor cope with | x Counselor did not attempt values? Were attempts made to impose counselor values during the interview? to impose personal values ‘on group members Counseling relationship: Were student counselor-client relationships conducive to productive counseling? Was a counseling relationship established? ‘Counseling relationship was very conducive; Counselor created a safe environmentStudent Name: Alfa Rodriguez Date of Review: 3/29/17 Skill Areas [5 ]4]3]2]1 |N/A Feedback ‘Closing: Was closing initiated by student counselor or client? Was it abrupt or brusque? Any follow-up or further interview scheduling accomplished? Not present on the audio segment General techniques: How well did the student counselor | x conduct the mechanics of the interview? of skills. Be deliberate on using some techniques. Duration of interview: Was interview too long or too short? | x | Should interview have been terminated sooner or later? ‘Session duration was appropriate Vocabulary level: Was student counselor vocabulary x appropriate for the client? Vocabulary level was appropriate for the members Mannerisms: Did the student counselor display any _ x mannerisms that might have adversely affected the interview or portions thereof? Counselor was very professional Verbo! Interview, interrupt, override, or become too wordy? f Did the student counselor dominate the x Counselor shared time well with group members Silences: Were silences broken to meet student counselor x needs, or were they dealt with in an effectual manner? Silence would have been utilized more Overall Remarks/Feedback: The choice of activity was very appropriate for group members. It would have been difficult to have them just talk without some visual aid. You did well to acknowledge the struggles of group members. You created a safe and trusting environment for members to share about their struggles. It would have been good to ask other group members to give feedback to another member-this. ‘empowering and provides needed support for the member. very Given that this was a large group and every member needed to share), you did well to try and engage every member. ‘What is your goal for the next session? Overall, a great session. 10/10