Throughout the article there are multiple claims backing up and disagreeing with the use

of neuroenhancers although the majority show issues. The author cycles through
different drugs used and describes interesting side effects that range from factual data
to personnel accounts. The connections between cosmetic neurology and plastic
surgery show that the author is bringing light to the positive aspects while reflecting on
the negative ones. This gave a sense of honesty to the opinions because of the way the
information was given. It shows that the author is open to the idea while also having
doubts and requiring assurances.

The topic of autonomous driving is extremely diverse in the meaning of debate and
making claims. There are so many variables and ways to attempt solving these issues
that there is always question in the self-driving world. There is the claim of whether or
not we need complete autonomous cars, although they are still being researched on the
multi-million dollar level because of the possible uses. There is most likely going to be a
strong cause and effect claim because the idea is so new to the world that there must
be attempts that do not succeed completely. The largest stasis claim would be to allow
autonomous cars now before the technology is completely finished. There have already
been large issues with semi-autonomous vehicles because the car was not prepared for
the incident, and because nearly every car company is beginning to release semi-
autonomous cars the incidents will only grow. One other issue of many includes the
actual ability to drive, because someone drunk or even a child driving an autonomous
car could lead to lawsuits and accidents. That was one of many smaller claims to back
up the primary claim previously stated.