Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
This paper discusses a detail about the distribution of first-person singular subject
pronouns in Zapotec. The pronouns in general are presented in another paper
(forthcoming).
1
In Coatecas Altas Zapotec, only the first-person has two different enclitic forms.
The a/n pronoun is also used for first person singular possessor of body part nouns
and a subset of kinship nouns.
[6] yek a
zca jik a
head 1.sg
mi cabeza
my head (Benton, f.n.)
[7] ndxa n
zca na n
ear-1.sg
mi oreja
my ear (Benton, f.n.)
2
This verb may be analyzed as a morphological causative derived from the simple intransitive verb a t
die.
3
[8] xuz a
zca uz a
father 1.sg
mi padre
my father (Benton, f.n.)
The d-initial pronoun is used for first person singular possessor of alienably-
possessed nouns and a different subset of kinship nouns. (It is not clear whether there is
any motivation for the split in the kinship nouns. This has not been studied yet.)
[9] za da3
zca za da
bean 1.sg
mi frijol
my bean (Benton, f.n.)
[10] bay da
zca baj da
shawl 1.sg
mi rebozo
my shawl (Benton, f.n.)
[11] bel da
zca bel da
sister.FE 1.sg
mi hermana (de mujer)
my sister (of woman) (Benton, f.n.)
3
When a nominal head is not present, or da is separated from its nominal head by other elements, the
genetive preposition chen pertain to is used with da, as with other pronominal clitics:
Further investigation reveals that verbs which require the d-initial pronoun are
usually eperiencer type verbs. The following examples are all in the Potential aspect,
which is usually null for consonant-initial roots, or /g-/ for vowel- initial roots:
Zakzi da.4 I will be punished/ suffer greatly.
Voy a ser castigado/ pasar un sufrimento grande.
Zak da. I will suffer.
Me voy a pasar un sufrimiento/ tiempo difcil.
Zheb da. I will be afraid.
Voy a tener miedo.
Lan da. I will be hungry.
Voy a tener hambre.
G-akne da. I will be sick.
Me voy a enfermar.
Gach da. I will be buried.
Me voy a sepultar.
Ruban da. I will come back to life.
Voy a volver a vivir.
Yaga da. I will be arrested
Me van a agarrar.
4
It is possible that the final syllable in zakzi is related to the verb zi physically sense, and this potential
relationship needs to be investigated further. The only other word in zca with this root is yal-zi NOM-
punishment.
5
5
Miyizh crazy is actually what was the Completive form of a verb which probably originally meant
become ill. Another frozen form of this verb survives in the nominalized form, yal-yezh (NOM-be.ill),
which means illness. The formerly Completive form of what was probably originally a verb is now an
adverb, and means be mentally ill. The current verb for become ill is nzhak-ne (H-be.done-pain), with
ne meaning pain.
6
[16] Xi da.
zca i da
Young 1.sg
Soy joven 1.sg
I am young. (Benton, f.n.)
6
Adjectives and stative verbs are not always easily distinguished in zca. While verbs are normally
distinguished from adjectives by their aspect prefixes, some adjectives come from frozen forms of verbs in
the Completive aspect (e.g., miyizh crazy, which comes from the Completive form of *-yizh, which
originally meant to become ill). Adjectives typically occur without any prefixes, and can sound or look like
stative verbs with a null Potential aspect prefix.
11
Zi Physically sense, wix Desire (in a covetous way) and zen Psychologically
7
sense do not take a noun phrase as their direct object, but rather a clause. These are
the only verbs requiring the d-initial pronoun that I know of with this restriction.
[23] Zi da kwan tul.
zca zi da kwan t ul.
P.sense 1.sg that.which pretty
Voy a sentir lo que es bonito.
I will feel something good. (Benton, f.n.)
(Alternate translation: Something good will be felt to me.)
At least one speaker8 uses the d-initial form with miliwen healed. Mili did normally
takes the a/-n form of the 1sg. pronoun, but when wen well is incorpororated as an
adverb, this speaker uses the d-intial pronoun:
[26] Mili wen da lu.
zca mili wen da lu
C.do well 1.sg 2.sg
Te san.
I healed you. (Benton, f.n.)
However, one other speaker I consulted9 says that the above example is incorrect, and
that only the a/-n form of the 1sg. pronoun clitic is the correct one to use:
7
According to others I interviewed after writing this paper, zi and zen are identical in meaning.
8
This speaker has lived outside of the language community since he was a young teen, and I do not consider
him a good model of the language.
9
This speaker has lived for most of his life in the language community, and I consider him to be a much
better model of the language than the first speaker.
13
Since prepositions are nearly always obligatorily possessed body parts, only the a/-n
form of the 1sg. subject clitic occurs with these.
I currently know of only two other cases in which an intervening adverbial element can
trigger the d-initial pronoun. Gaknu help, normally takes the a/-n form of the 1sg.
pronoun, but when followed by ra more, the d-initial pronoun is used, provided that a
clause-initial element (including the negative particle na-) prevents the d-initial pronoun
from being fronted.
However, if the subject clitic can be fronted, it is ungrammatical for the d- initial
pronoun to occur after the close-knit adverb:
10
Even though the 2pl. pronoun clitic, go, does have the meaning of you all, it is more often used as the
polite 2sg. form, like Spanish usted. For this reason, the prefix r, all, is needed to make it clear that the
plural sense is intended.
14
It looks like in preverbal position the difference between na and leeda is something else
it is correlated with what has been said so far. Did I misunderstand that? From
looking at further data, it appears that the choice between preverbal na and lda is
determined by two factors: relative prominence and negation on the verb. Na appears
to be the default form11, while lda12 is an option for greater prominence if the verb is
not negated. For example, in the following pair of examples, while na is the default
form, lda is optional, and is probably more emphatic:
[32] Ter nayat al Lola, per na ya ka (default)
Although Not.P.go 2.sg Oaxaca but 1.sg P.go certainly
Although you will not go to Oaxaca, but I will certainly go.
However, in the following pair of examples, the example with lda is considered
ungrammatical, most likely because the verb is negated:
[34] Lu gak ya Lola, per na nayat (default)
2.sg P.can P.go Oaxaca but 1.sg Not.P.go.neg
You can go to Oaxaca, but I will not go.
11
My main language associate calls it the automatic form.
12
My main language associate calls this the more complete form.
15
6. References
See Zapotec grammar data sources and bibliography for Zapotec-specific references.
Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle. 2004. Is Valley Zapotec lohoh a dative marker? Paper
presented at the First Conference on Otomanguean and Oaxacan Languages.