Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vanessa Trejo
Professor Bevill
ENGL 1302-IN1
29 April, 2017
TEKS, Texas essential knowledge and skills. TEKS is a very important thing here in
Texas, considering that TEKS is the guide that teachers base most of their curriculum by. At the
end of the school year, students have to master the requirements that TEKS sets in order to move
on to the next grade level. TEKS undergoes changes every now and then when the State Board of
Education (also known as the SBOE) sees the need for a change. The latest change to TEKS was
done in 2012 when Commissioner Robert Scott brought together top math educators and
experts from Texas to form a Mathematics Advisory Group (Cargill 1). These math experts
decided that the mathematical TEKS needed to be adjusted to meet the changes happening in the
world, arguing that many careers now require more and different mathematics (Cargill 2). This
change in the mathematical TEKS resulted in teachers struggling to deliver these new lessons
and meeting all the new TEKS standards. The State Board of Education recognizes that these
changes are going to be very difficult for both teachers and students considering that the last
change prior to the 2012 change was done in the school year of 1998-99 (Nelson). Teachers went
from teaching the same material for twelve years to a three sixty spin on material. Another
problem that the shift down of TEKS first faced was the dramatic drop of STAAR math test
scores. In the summer of 2012, 25,374 students were tested on the Algebra 1 material. The results
of this test were thirty three percent passing, one percent passing with a commended score;
which is above average, sixty seven percent failing, and fifteen percent failing with a minimum
Trejo 2
score (STAAR State Wide Summary Reports 2011-2012). After the modification made to the
mathematical TEKS in 2012 the scores dropped dramatically in the summer of 2014. A total of
one thousand seven hundred and fifty nine students were tested on the algebra 1 material. The
results were the following, seventeen percent passed, zero percent passed above average and
eighty three percent failed. Seeing these results make people wonder, maybe the new
modification made to TEKS arent very efficient? Well yes it is true, the drop rate of scores is
huge. However keep in mind this was the first year the new mathematical shift down was being
tested. The Texas Education Agency should improve their approach towards the math TEKS
change because this would benefit the students to do better and to prepare them for the future.
Providing teachers with more math adjustment training will be a great way to better
prepare teachers for the drastic alterations of the math TEKS. As a math supervisor, Devin Hanes
says we are asking first year teachers and veterans to be first year teachers again (Dallas News
1). The idea that TEKS was going to be undergoing some changes was introduced to the school
districts well in advanced. This allowed trainings on the new TEKS available starting in the
summer of 2013 (Cargill 2). Understanding that children will need extra help with this change is
just as important as recognizing that teachers will need extra help as well. Furthermore,
adjustments will require several training opportunities that be mandatory. The change in math
TEKS was made so that our students would be better prepared for the future not to set them up
for failure. If the teachers dont completely comprehend what they are supposed to be delivering
to the class then it is inevitable that this will lead to failure. The saying practice makes perfect
can be applied to this situation; it is understandable for teachers to be scared of something new.
Ashley Nick, a 5th grade teacher in Richardson ISD started a training session in the summer of
2013 she states she felt there was some apprehension in the room, however as the trainings
Trejo 3
went on Ashley Nick restates that the anxiety dropped a bit (Dallas News 2). Spreading this
tactic all over the state of Texas will result in positive outcomes from the shift down of TEKS.
As children enter the adolescent stage, they begin to question everything, especially
school. Middle school teachers often hear the question How is this important? or When will I
used this in real life? These types of questions increase when children feel challenged in their
academic classes. When students feel like what they are learning in the classroom will never help
them out in the real world after high school things like dropout rates increase. Students drop out
for several reasons; one major factor is coursework is not challenging enough to maintain
students interested (Hawkins and Richardson 1), hopefully this will not be an issue with the new
mathematical TEKS. Another reason why students drop out is because teachers do not link
rigorous course material to things that matter in students everyday life (Hawkins and
Richardson 2). This is a huge concern now that the material has gotten challenging in every
grade level. Students are likely to feel like they dont have to try to learn this new challenging
material because it does not benefit them in their everyday lives. A new study shows that
students who sit through a lesson full of just text book reading and lectures are 1.5 times more
likely to fail (Bajak 1). Including active learning methods (Bajak 2) during a lesson is a great
benefit for students because not only are they constantly engaged and participating, but they are
also learning more this way. When working with groups and making projects children are using
more than one sense; they are using their touch, vision, and hearing. The more parts of the brain
you use, the more likely you are to retain information (Cleaver 1). As Ben Mardell, says kids
learn through all of their senses. It is true that always working with busy hands can be
challenging and a little extra work for the teacher it is worth the effort. A hands on classroom will
definitely help smoothen out the transition of the new mathematical TEKS.
Trejo 4
All children have different ways of learning. Some students work better with groups,
others hate working alone, and others just need that extra one on one help. However, when you
have a full class of students, sometimes it is hard to provide one on one help to that students that
is struggling. This concept can get a little harder when you are a middle school teacher, several
middle schools have drifted away from the idea of pulling small groups of students out of
classrooms to have a mini tutorial session. With the new shift down of TEKS frustration and
struggles are to be expected. Thus I propose that schools should go back to the small group
tutorial sessions. These small groups can have several benefits, one of the many benefits is
flexible learning. When working with a small group it is easier to monitor the rest of the
students (Genie tutors 1) and work with an individual on the side. Deciding what students are
going to be pulled out of an elective classroom for small group tutorial can be decided based on a
specific math area those students are struggling in. This will also facilitate the tutorial session
because the teacher will know what specific area most of the students in that group are struggling
with. Another great benefit to working in small groups is building team working skills (Genie
tutors 2). In a large classroom, students might feel embarrassed or are just scared to ask a
question in front of the rest of their classmates because they are afraid to ask a dumb question.
Leaning in small groups makes places a child in a situation where they have to be socially
active (Genie tutors 3) because everyone in the group is working on the same problem. Small
groups will kill two birds with one stone while students get extra academic help there are
unconsciously working on their social skills. In order for small groups to work the school must
hire a few extra people such as tutors or co teachers to pull these children out of their elective
classes and into the small groups. The amount of tutors hired by the school will strictly depend
Trejo 5
on where the school is located and the amount of financial support the school district provides
All in all several different approaches can be made to try to facilitate the drastic shift
down of the mathematical TEKS. With every change there are struggles, and with this particular
change it will just have to be a trial and error type of situation. What works in one school district
may not always work for the other. However it is important to constantly be making an effort to
facilitate these changes for the students and for the teachers. These adjustment will require a little
more effort, time, and money investment however the results of having college ready students
will certainly be satisfying. Children are the future, therefor there must be a constant effort to
Work Cited
Bajak, Aleszu. "Lectures Aren't Just Boring, They're Ineffective, Too, Study Finds." Science |
Cargill, Barbara. "State Board of Education." State Board of Education, n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2017.
Hawkins, Alyssa, and Scott Richardson. "Weaving STEM, Exploration, and Community
Service." AMLE - Association for Middle Level Education. Association for Middle Level
Nelson, Jim. "TEA Correspondence." TAAS. N.p., 25 Oct. 1999. Web. 26 Apr. 2017.
<http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/taa/taas991025.html>.
STAAR State Wide Summary Reports 2011-2012. STAAR Statewide Summary Reports 2011-
"STAAR Statewide Summary Reports 2013-2014." STAAR Statewide Summary Reports 2013-
Weiss, Jeffery. "New State Math Standards Mean Many Kids Started the Year behind
Education." Dallas News. The Dallas Morning News, 06 Sept. 2014. Web. 19 Apr. 2017.
"5 Benefits of Learning in Small Groups." Genie Tutors. Genie Tutors, 15 Jan. 2016. Web. 20
Apr. 2017.