Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HEALTH
JOURNAL
OF PUBLIC
BULGARIAN
CONTENTS
MENTAL HEALTH
- Mental health services in four European Countries
H. Hinkov, M. Dlouh, G. Cosoveanu, P. imrik,
. , . , . . , 2 Z. Zarkov, M. Okolyiski, A. Broshtilov
. , . , .
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
, Changes in hematological parameters of workers
(CS2) exposed to carbon disulfide (CS2)
. , . , . 24 N. Dimitrova, T. Popov, T. Panev
Evaluation of the effect of exposure to pesticides
on immune response
. , ., ., . 32 T.Vergieva, P. Theoharov, C. Zaykov, M. Vukov
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(UV) Study on the presence of ultraviolet (UV) filters
in Bulgarian sunscreen products
. , . , . , . 51 S. Uzunova, A.Tachev, D. Chohadjieva, N.Vasileva
DISCUSSION
Nanotechnology potential health risk
. , . 61 I. Hinkov, K. Angelova
68 NEW BOOKS
70 NEWS
: Abstract
) Aim:
- - The objectives of this study are: (a) to describe and
(, , ) analyze the current status of mental health services in
selected Eastern European countries (the Czech Republic,
) , Slovakia, Romania, and Bulgaria) and (b) to identify
- common trends as well as national specifics in organizing
, the mental health services and to find opportunities
. for transfer of knowledge and experience among the
: countries.
, - Methods:
, The country-specific information was obtained from the
. - section in the questionnaire that is devoted to organization,
, ownership and capacity of the local mental health services
in the four countries. The questionnaire was prepared by
, , the international team and includes both quantitative
. as well as qualitative information about mental health
: policy, service organization, resource allocation and
. other relevant topics.
e : - Results:
. A comparative study between four countries in Central
and East Europe is presented. The scope of the analysis is
, focused on two basic types of services only: outpatient and
. inpatient mental health services. In the Czech Republic
- and Slovakia treatment of severe mental disorders is
. available also in primary care while in Bulgaria and
: Romania it is strictly done by psychiatrists. This fact
- shows different levels of integration of the mental health
. , , care in the primary care.
, Conclusions:
. All the four countries have started mayor changes in
. their systems of delivering mental health care. The
, diversities due to different context as well starting points
. in the reforms could be overcome. The information gap
identified is a challenge for the countries and common
indicators related with the utilization of the services are
: , - needed.
, , -
.
Key Words: Community Psychiatry, Compara-
tive Studies, Psychiatric Social Service, Eastern
Europe
: Declaration of Interest:
This research was supported from the project Finance
- and Mental Health Services Training in Czech Republic/
/ , - Central Europe, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes
, of Health, John E. Fogarty International Centre (5 D43
(5 D43 TW005810-07). TW005810-07).
1. 1. Introduction
, The development of the countries in the Eastern Europe
1989 , , after the major political changes in 1989 has similarities
, , as well as differences, stemming from the particular
. , background, where the reforms in these countries started.
- , In many aspects it is evident, and in mental health care
it is quite symptomatic, that the level of preparedness
: and maturity of the society for global changes reflected
. , in the willingness to reform: from the politics to the
- ordinary experts. Traditional psychiatry that was adopted
, , more or less in the countries of the post-Soviet block
has left its impact onto the style, way of thinking and
. , general attitude of the most of professionals in the field.
, , Moreover, it had implications on the surrounding society
. , including relatives and even the users themselves. The
idea that most of the severe mental disorders could be
, treated without unavoidable in the past seclusion and
isolation, accompanied by reactions of marginalizing and
, rejection on behalf of the local community, was perceived
. as unrealistic and far away from the common sense. This
widespread belief prevented for a long time any effort
- . to reform the system - quite longer then in the general
health care. As a result, in this sector one could observe
, examples of good, modern community practices existing
, , in parallel with old-fashioned, institutional and rigid
, stereotypes performed by many professionals working in
the still functioning, unreformed system of mental health
. care. This is the main reason for the observer to have an
, impression that mental health services in these countries
. have eclectic characteristics. In fact, observation and
, analysis of the types, modes and ways of providing mental
- - health services is the most reliable indicator for a good
implementation of a declared official policy (1).
(1).
2. Data Analytic Procedures
2. We attempt to analyze and compare the types of provision
and ways of utilization of the mental health services in
- four countries from Eastern Europe. The instrument used
. to collect data is a questionnaire prepared within the
, , frames of an international project for investigation and
, assessment of resource allocation in mental health. The
questionnaire has several sections dealing with different
. , topics like national policy, financial flows mental health
services etc. The comparison and analysis is made on a
, ,
base of answers from the four participating countries in
, - ..
the section Mental health services. Some of data for the
analysis are taken from the WHO report Policies and
-
practices for mental health in Europe WHO Regional
.
Office for Europe. (2008) (2).
,
(2008) (2).
1, .4 . - . 2009 BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH Vol. 1, N 4 Oct. - Dec. 3
MENTAL HEALTH
()
Country Population Number of physicians Number of Number of consultations
(psychiatrists) patients treated
, 2006
7 679 290 428* 175 677
Bulgaria, 2006 NA
, 2007
10 322 689 697 464 836 2 662 032
Czech Republic, 2007
, 2005
21 623 848 1 398 222 000
Romania, 2005 NA
, 2006
5 391 184 304 258 650 1 615 105
Slovakia, 2006
( /
10000)
Country Number of hospitals Number of beds total Number of discharges/ Personnel
ALOS in days
and per 10000 admissions
24 4 922 (6.4) 25 521 38.98
Bulgaria N/A
20 9 858 (9.6) 41 719 79.4 5348.14
Czech Republic
38 17 224 (7.5) N/A 18.3
Romania N/A
*
12 N/A N/A N/A
Slovakia* N/A
* *For Slovakia the number of beds and other data are not available for psychiatric
, hospitals and psychiatric departments separately, so they are included in the
( -) table for general hospitals with psychiatric departments (see below)
32 1439 (1.4) 18 914 20.9 147.2
Czech Republic
75 4540 (2.1)* 48 000 N/A 900
Romania
** 35 ()
4502 (8.4) 36376/38 730 32.7 286.98
Slovakia** (est.)
* (2.1) *Data (2.1) is taken from WHO report on policies and practices for mental health
, 2008. in Europe, 2008
** **Aggregated data for psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric departments in
2005. general hospitals, Psychiatric Care in SR 2005.
12
10
8
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
6 Romania
Slovakia
4
0
1995 2000 2005 2006
100
90
80
70
60 Bulgaria
Czech Republic
50
Romania
40 Slovakia
30
20
10
0
1995 2000 2005 2006
35
30
25
20 Bulgaria
Czech Republic
15
10
0
1995 2000 2005 2006
35
30
25
20 Bulgaria
Czech Republic
15 Slovakia
10
0
1995 2000 2005 2006
45000
40000
35000
30000
Bulgaria
25000
Czech Republic
20000 Slovakia
15000
10000
5000
0
1995 2000 2005 2006
/ References
1. Knapp M, McDaid D, Mossialos E and Thornicroft G (eds). Mental health 9. National Center of Health Information. Health care, brief statistical
policy and practice across Europe: The future direction of mental health care. manual. National Center of Health Information: Sofia; 2008.
Open University Press; 2006. 10. Romanian Ministry of Public Health. Statistical data. Bucharest,
2. WHO Regional office for Europe. Policies and practices for mental health in Ministry of Public Health Computing Centre of Health Statistics
Europe. WHO Regional office for Europe; 2008 and Medical Documentation; 2006.
3. Jacob KS, Sharan P, Mirza I, Garrido-Cumbrera M, Seedat S, Mari JJ, 11. Scheffler RM & Potek M. (eds). Mental Health Care Reform in
Sreenivas V, Saxena S. Mental health system in countries: where are we the Czech and Slovak Republics, 1989 to the Present. Karolinum
now? Lancet 2007; 370: 1061-1077. Press: Prague; 2008.
4. Johnston T. Supporting a healthy transition. Lessons from early World Bank 12. Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic.
experience in eastern Europe. Washington DC, World Bank Operations Psychiatric Care 2007. Institute of Health Information and Statis-
Evaluation Department, 2002, http://www.worldbank.org/oed/transitionecon- tics of the Czech Republic: Prague; 2008.
omies/docs/eca_health_wp.pdf 13. Commission of the European Communities. Commission staff
5. Vldescu C, Scntee G, Olsavszky V, Allin S and Mladovsky P. Romania: working document 596: Romania May 2006 monitoring report.
Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2008; 10(3): 1-172. Brussels, European Commission, 2006. http://ec.europa.eu/en-
http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E91689.pdf largement/pdf/key_documents/2006/monitoring_report_ro_en.pdf
6. Dlouh M.. Mental health care system and mental health care expenditures 14. World Health Organization, Mental Health in Europe. Country re-
in the Czech Republic. The Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics ports from the WHO European Network on Mental Health, 2001.
2004; 7: 159165. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001. http://www.euro.who.
int/document/E76230.pdf
7. National Health Information Center.. Psychiatric Care in the Slovak Republic
2007. National Health Information Center: Bratislava; 2008. 15. World Health Organization. ATLAS: country profiles, 2001. Gene-
va, World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and
8. Tomov T., Mladenova M., Lazarova I., Sotirov V., Okoliyski M. Bulgaria mental Substance Dependence, 2001. http://www.who.int/mental_health
health country profile. International Review of Psychiatry 2004; 16: 93-106.
, composition prediction models, which are developed by
, using multiple regression analysis (21).
(21).
Anthropometric descriptive methods, based on prediction
models of body composition, apply somatic measurements
, - , for evaluation of body fat and assessment of health risk.
1, .4 . - . 2009 BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH Vol. 1, N 4 Oct. - Dec. 17
FOODS AND NUTRITION
180
vit.B1
160
vit.B2
140 vit.B6
vit.PP
120
Folate
% , RDA
100
80
60
40
20
0
/m /f /m /f /m /f /m /f
100
Ca
90
Mg
80
70
60
% , RDA
50
40
30
20
10
0
/m /f /m /f /m /f /m /f
80
70
60
12,4
13,6 31,2
15,2 22,1
50 16
16,6
40
10,7
30
6,1
50,5
47,4
43,7
20
2,6 4,7 41,4 40,7 39,2 / obesity
33,7
3,5 30,4
23,5 / overweight
10 19,7 18,1
13,3
0
1998 2004 1998 2004 1998 2004 1998 2004 1998 2004 1998 2004
/ (.)/
M/M 19-30 /F 19-30 M/M 30-60 /F 30-60 M/M 60-75 /F 60-75
Gender/Age (years)
Some doubts have been existed about primary prevention
and benefits of changing dietary and behavioral habits for
risk reduction in elderly people, but the acceleration in
(22,31). , functional decline caused by external factors is believed
, , , 2, to be reversible (22). WHO emphasizes that secondary
, prevention through diet and physical activity should be
(31). , , a complementary strategy in retarding the progression of
existing chronic diseases and decreasing mortality (22). A
(31,32). ,
study of primary prevention in randomized double-blind
, ,
placebo-controlled prospective trial, on cohort of 39 876
/ REFERENCES
1. Solomons NW. Demographic and nutritional trends among the elderly in application in the elderly. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
developed and developing regions. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S26-S32.
2000; 54 (Suppl.3): S2-S14. 22. WHO. Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases.
2. UN. World Population Ageing: 1950-2050. UN publ.No E.02.XIII.3. United TRS 916. WHO Geneva, 2003.
Nations DESA, Population Division, New York. 2002. 23. Seidell JC, Visscher TLS. Body weight and weight change and
3. UN. World Population Ageing: 2009. ESA/P/WP/212. United Nations DESA, their health implications for the elderly. European Journal of
Population Division, New York. 2009. Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S33-S39.
4. WHO/Tufts University. Keep fit for life. Meeting the nutritional needs of 24. Huffman GB. Evaluating and treating unintentional weight loss in
older persons. Tufts University, School of Nutrition Science and Policy, the elderly. American Family Physician, 2002; 65 (4): 640-650.
WHO, Geneva, 2002. 25. Miller SL, Wolfe RR. The danger of weight loss in the elderly. The
5. UN. Report of the Second World Assembly on Aging. Madrid 8-12 April Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 2008; 12 (7): 487-491.
2002. A/CONF.197/9. No E.02.IV.4. United Nations, New York 2002. 26. Ritz P. Obesity in the elderly: should we be using new diagnostic
6. Henry CJK, Ritz P, Roth GS, Lane M, Solomons NW. Report of the IDECG criteria? The Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging 2009; 13 (3):
Working Group on the biology of aging. European Journal of Clinical 168-169.
Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S157-S159. 27. Dey DK, Rothenberg E, Sundh V, Bosaeus I, Steen B. Height
7. IOM (Institute of Medicine). The Role of Nutrition in Maintaining Health and body weight in the elderly. I. A 25-year longitudinal study
in the Nations Elderly. Evaluating Coverage of Nutrition Services for the of a population aged 70 to 95 years. European Journal of Clinical
Medicare Population. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2000. Nutrition 1999; 53: 905-914.
8. Henry CJK. Mechanisms of changes in basal metabolism during ageing. 28. Mazza A, Zamboni S, Tikhonoff V, Schiavon L, Pessina AC, Casiglia
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S77-S91. E. Body Mass Index and mortality in elderly men and women from
9. Beaufrre B, Castaneda C, de Groot L, Kurpad A, Roberts S, Tessari P. Report general population. Gerontology 2007; 53 (1): 36-45.
of the IDECG Working Group on energy and macronutrient metabolism and 29. Dey DK, Rothenberg E, Sundh V, Bosaeus I, Steen B. Body
requirements of the elderly. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; mass index, weight change and mortality in the elderly. A 15 y
54(Suppl.3): S162-S163. longitudinal population study of 70 y olds. European Journal of
10. Elia M, Ritz P, Stubs RJ. Total energy expenditure in the elderly. European Clinical Nutrition 2001; 55: 482-492.
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S92-S103. 30. Caterson ID. Overweight and obesity. In: Essentials of Human
11. Starling RD, Poehlman ET. Assessment of energy requirements in elderly Nutrition. 2nd ed. J Mann & AS Truswell (eds). Oxford University
populations. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): Press, 2002; 273-287.
S104-S111. 31. WHO. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting
12. Roberts SB. Regulation of energy intake in relation to metabolic state and healthy life. WHO, Geneva 2002.
nutritional status. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): 32. Wahlqvist ML, Savige GS. Intervention aimed at dietary and
S64-S69. lifestyle changes to promote healthy aging. European Journal of
13. Roubenoff R. Sarcopenia and its implications for the elderly. European Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S148-S156.
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S40-S47. 33. Woo J. Relationship among diet, physical activity and other
14. WHO. Protein and Amino Acid Requirements in Human Nutrition. TRS 935. lifestyle factors and debilitating diseases in the elderly. European
WHO, Geneva, 2007. Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S143-S147.
15. Ritz P. Physiology of aging with respect to gastrointestinal, circulatory 34. WHO. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. WHO/NMH/NPH/02.8.
and immune system changes and their significance for energy and protein WHO NCD & MHC, NCDP & HPD, Ageing and Life Course.
metabolism. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): Geneva, 2002.
S21-S25. 35. WHO. International Plan of Action on Aging: Report on
16. Toth MJ, Tchernof A. Lipid metabolism in the elderly. European Journal of Implementation. WHO EB115/29. WHO, 2004.
Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S121-S125. 36. Liu S, Manson JAE, Lee I-M, Cole SR, Hennekens CH, Willett WC,
17. Elahi D, Muller DC. Carbohydrate metabolism in the elderly. European Buring JE. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular
Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): S112-S120. disease: the Womens Health Study. American Journal of Clinical
18. Beaufrre B, Morio B. Fat and protein redistribution with aging: metabolic Nutrition 2000; 72 (4): 922-928.
considerations. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000; 54(Suppl.3): 37. Albert J. Global pattern and country experiences with the
S48-S53. formulation and implementation of Food-Based Dietary Guidelines.
19. Petrova S, Angelova K. Food-Based Dietary Guidelines for Bulgarian adults Annals of Nutrition & Metabolism 2007; 51 (suppl): 2-7.
38. NHMRC. Dietary Guidelines for older Australians. Ed. C.Binns.
scientific background for development and formulation. Advances in
NHM, 1999.
Bulgarian Sciences 2006; 4: 19-33.
39. Russell RM, Rasmussen H, Lichtenstein AH. Modified food guide
20. ,
pyramid for people over seventy years of age. Journal of Nutrition
.
1999; 129: 751-753.
2005-2010. , . / Ministry of Health, National Center
40. Roubenoff R, Scrimshaw N, Shetty P, Woo J. Report of the
of Public Health Protection. National Action Plan Food and Nutrition 2005-
IDECG Working group on the role of lifestyle including nutrition
2010. MH, NCPHP, 2005 (in Bulg.).
for the health of the elderly. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
21. Heymsfield SB, Nuez C, Testolin C, Gallagher D. Anthropometry and
2000; 54(Suppl.3): S164-S165.
methods of body composition measurement for research and field
CHANGES IN HEMATOLOGICAL
, PARAMETERS OF WORKERS EXPOSED
(CS2) TO CARBON DISULFIDE (CS2)
, , Nelia Dimitrova, Todor Popov, Teodor Panev
National Center of Public Health Protection
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the effects of carbon
(CS2) disulfide (CS2) on hematological parameters in workers
CS2 . exposed to different CS2 levels in the workplace air. A
76 , total of 76 workers were examined, distributed within
, : (20 10,9mg/m3), occupational groups exposed to CS2 with different
(4 4,0mg/m3), (2 2,0mg/m3) exposure levels: group - (20 10,9mg/m3), group -
23 , . (4 4,0mg/m3), group - (2 2,0mg/m3) and a control
CS2 group of 23 individuals non-exposed to chemical hazards.
, - CS2 concentrations in the workplace were determined by
. gas chromatography with mass spectrometric detector.
. Hematological parameters were determined by automated
() . hematology analyzer. A microscopic method was used
- to determine the differential blood count. Clinical-
(6 - 8 % laboratory tests showed a relatively low percentage of
), anemia syndrome (6 - 8 % in exposed individuals from the
, , , and group), moreover the trends registered a decrease
in values of hemoglobin, erythrocytes, hematocrit as
, well as indicated an increase in amounts of erythrocytes
. - - and elevated content of hemoglobin as the changes in
them resembled macrocytic anemia. The higher number
. of platelets was with lower rate at all exposure levels.
- In differential blood count trends to high lymphocyte
. count were registered as well as relatively lower rate of
CS2 leucocytes and their stab forms. The study performed
. was taken into consideration in the establishment of
limit values of CS2 in the workplace air in Bulgaria. This
CS2 E . value is close to the indicative ones recommended by the
European Commission.
: ,
, , Key words: carbon disulfide, limit value for
workplace air, hematology, complete blood count
Introduction
There is extensive evidence on the toxic effects of carbon
disulfide in humans and animals; including a number
(1,2,3,4). - of comprehensive reviews (1, 2, 3, 4). Among the most
: serious toxic effects of long-term exposure to CS2 are:
, chronic neurological damage to both the central (CNS)
, and peripheral nervous systems (PNS) as polyneuropathy
, - with reduced velocity of stimuli transfer of both motor and
, - (5,6,7,8,9,10), - sensory nerves; cerebrovascular effects; neurobehavioural
, - changes (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), cardiovascular effects associated
, with higher levels of serum cholesterol, triglycerides and
, , low density lipoproteins (LDLP) with manifestations like
- hypertensive disease, ischemic heart disease with more
- rapid development of atherosclerosis and higher mortality
(11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19); , rate after myocardial infarction (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,
(.)
Groups (%) Age Current smokers
Sex Length of employment (y)
n (XSD) (%)
(XSD)
/men 52
Control group 44,69,9 0 39
/women 48
(n =23)
I
/men 38
I group 40,86,2 13,238,7 27
/women 62
(n= 26)
II
/men 48
II group 46,16,7 18,89,4 40
/women 52
(n=25)
III
/men
III group 100 49,49,4 17,811,4 40
(n=25)
ethods
CS2 CS2 concentrations in workplace air were defined by gas
, - chromatography with mass spectrometric detector (Perkin
(Perkin Elmer, Q mass 910). Elmer, Q mass 910).
9 Nine hematological parameters were examined by
(Serono 190+): (WBC) [3,5-10,5]*; automated analyzer (Serono 190+): leucocytes (WBC)
(RBC) [m** 4,6-6,2; w 4,2-5,4]; [3,5-10,5]*; erythrocytes (RBC) [m** 4,6-6,2; w 4,2-
(HGB) [m 140-180; w 120-160]; (HCT) [m 5,4] (*[ ] Referent values, **m - men; w women);
0,40-0,54; w 0,37-0,47]; (MCV) hemoglobin (HGB) [m 140-180; w 120-160];
[m 85-89; w 82-92]; hematocrit (HCT) [m 0,40-0,54; w 0,37-0,47]; mean
(MCH) [26,5-31,5]; corpuscular volume (MCV) [m 85-89; w 82-92];
(MCHC) [m 295-45; w 320-360], mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) [26,5-31,5]; mean
(PLT) [140-440]; corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) [m
295-345; w 320-360], platelets (PLT) [140-440]; mean
(MPV) [7-9]. [St
platelet volume (MPV) [7-9]. A differential blood count
3-6%; Sg 51-67%; Eo 2-4%; Ba 0,25-1%; Ly 22-40%; Mo 4-8%;
was made [St 3-6%; Sg 51-67%; Eo 2-4%; Ba 0,25-1%;
Pl 0-0,5%].
Ly 22-40%; Mo 4-8%; Pl 0-0,5%] .
-
For the assessment of exposure a personal 8-hour
Gilian 113 PS I sampling was carried out using low flow pumps type
(USA), 50-70 ml/min Gilian 113 PS I (USA), with flow rate of 50-70 ml/min
. , in the respiratory zone. Based on the data from individual
dosimetry, occupation and preliminary assessment of
, exposure, professional groups were determined by their
, .2. exposure levels, presented in Table 2.
2. - Table 2. Professional groups depending on levels of exposure
CS2 to CS2
I II III .
I group II group III group Control group
*[ ] -
**m- ; w-
: Legend:
n ; x ; n number ; x arithmetic means; standard deviation
RBC HGB HCT MCV MCH MCHC PLT
Group
m m m m
. m
8.3% 0% 25% 25%
8.3%
Controls
Total Total
n=23
w w w 21.7% w 0%
m -12 w
0% 9.1% 0% 18.2%
w - 11 0%
m m m m m
I 20% 40% 30% 30%
40%
I group >0.05 <0.01 >0.05 >0.05
>0.05
n=26 Total
Total
m -10 w w w w 15.4%
w 42.3%
w -16 0% 12.5% 18.5% 25% <0.01
6.3% >0.05
>0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05
m m m m m
8.3% 25% 25% 25% 41.7%
>0.05 >0.05 <0.02 >0.05 >0.05
II 8.3%
II group >0.05
n=25 Total
Total
m -12 w w w w w 4%
24%
w -13 15.4% 0% 7.7% 23% 7.7% >0.05
>0.05
>0.05 <0.05 >0.05 >0.05
7.7%
>0.05
m m m m m m m
III 20% 8% 16% 32% 24% 56% 12%
III group >0.05 >0.05 <0.05 >0.05 >0.05 >0.05 <0.05
n=25 (m) 8%
>0.05
: Legend:
n ; x ; n number ; x arithmetic means; standard deviation
St(%) Sg(%) Ly(%) Mo(%) Eo(%)
Group
I
x=0.42 x=55
I group x=38.8 x=4.15 x=1.65
=0.7 =8.49
=7.64 =2.31 =1.23
p<0.01
n=26
II
x=0.54 x=52.5 x=37.7 x=6.45 x=2.75
II group
=0.78 =10.1 =8.9 =2.87 =2.31
p<0.05 P<0.01
n=25
III
x=54.96 x=34.96 x=6.67 x=2.88
III group x=0.58
=7.53 =6.68 =2.75 =2.09
=0.78
p<0.01
n=25 p<0.05
.
x=1.17 x=56.65 x=34.87 x=4.48 x=2.39
Controls =1.03 =8.54 =7.43 =1.7 =1.78
n=23
: Legend:
n ; x ; n number ; x arithmetic means; standard deviation
, - , low referent limit (p<0.05) for the population. For the rate
20% (p>0.05), 31,8% (p<0.01) of segmented leucocytes (Sg) no significant differences
21,7% (p>0.05) in mean values for the groups were established, but in
, exposure-response relationship, in 20% of workers
8,7% (.1). of the group (p>0.05), 31.8% (p<0.01) of the group
.
40
.
30
20 .
10
0
%
-10
-20 .
-30 .
-40 .
.
-50
Sg Mo Ly
/Refernces
1. BUA (GDCh- Advisory Committee on Existing Chemicals). Carbon 17. Kotseva K, Popov T. Study of the cardiovascular effects of
disulphide: BUA Report 83, S Hirzel, Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, occupational exposure to organic solvents. Int. Arch. Occup.
Stuttgart, August 1991. Environ Health, 1998; 71: 87-91.
2. DECOS. Carbon disulphide. Health-based recommended occupational 18. Sulsky SI, Hooven FH, Burch MT, Mundt KA. Critical review of the
exposure limit, Health Council: Dutch Expert Committee on Occupational epidemiological literature on the potential cardiovascular effects
Standards (DECOS). The Hague: Health Council publication of occupational carbon disulphide exposure. Int. Arch. Occup.
No1994/08E.1994: 140. Environ. Health, 2002; 75: 365-380.
3. WHO. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 46, Carbon 19. Takebayashi T, Nishiwaki Y, Uemura T, Nakashima H, Nomiyama
disulphide, 2002. T, Sakurai H, Omae K. A six year follow up study of the subclinical
4. DFG. Schwefelkohlenstoff, Toxicologisch-arbeitsmedizinische Begrundun- effects of carbon disulphide exposure on the cardiovascular
gen fur MAK-Werte, 36. Lieferung, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2003. system. Occup. Environ. Med., 2004; 61: 127-134.
5. Ruijten M, Salle HJA, Verbrek MM, Muijer H. Special nerve functions and 20. Cai SX, Bao YS. Placental transfer, secretion into mother milk
colour discrimination in workers with long-term low-level exposure to of carbon disulphide and effect on maternal function of female
carbon disulphide. Br. J. Ind. Med., 1990; 47: 589-595. viscose rayon workers. Ind. Health, 1981; 19:15-29.
6. Ruijten M, Salle HJA, Verbrek MM. Verification of effects on the nervous 21. Zhou SY, Liang YX, Chen ZQ, Wang YL. Effects of occupational
system of low level occupational exposure to CS2. Br. J. Ind. Med., 1993; exposure to low-level carbon disulphide on menstruation and
50: 301-307. pregnancy. Ind. Health, 1988; 26: 203-214.
7. Cassitto MG, Camerino D, Imbriani M, Contardi T, Masera l, Gilioli R. Carbon 22. Vanhoorne M, Vermoeulen A, De Bacquer D. Epidemiological
disulphide and the central nervous system: a 15-year neurobehavioural study of endocrinological effects of carbon disulphide. Arch.
surveillance of an exposed population. Environ. Res,.1993; 63: 252-263. Environ. Health, 1993; 48: 370-375.
8. Chu C-C, Huan C-C, Chen R-S, Shih T-S. Polyneuropathy induced by carbon 23. Vanhoorne M, Comhare F, De Bacquer D. Epidemiological
disulphide in viscose rayon workers. Occup. Environ. Med., 1995; 52: 404- study of the effects of carbon disulphide on male sexuality and
407. reproduction. Arch. Environ. Health, 1994; 49:237-278.
9. Takebayashi T, Omae K, Ishizuka C, Nomiyama T, Sakurai H. Cross sectional 24. DFG. Schwefelkohlenstoff, Toxicologisch-arbeitsmedizinische
observation of the effects of carbon disulphide on the nervous system, Begrundun-gen fur MAK-Werte, Sammelkapitel MAK-Werte und
endocrine system and subjective symptoms in rayon manufacturing Schwangerschaft, 21. Lieferung, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,1995.
workers. Occup. Environ. Med., 1998; 55: 473-479. 25. WHO. EHC 10 Carbon disulfide. 1979: 48, 62, 63.
10. Nishiwaki Y, Takebayashi T, O`Uchi T, Nomiyama T, Uemura T, Sakurai 26. Toxicological Profile for Carbon disulfide. 1995: 23.
H, Omae K. Six year observational cohort study of the effect of carbon 27. Lisiewicz J, Immunotoxic and hematotoxic effects of occupational
disulphide on brain MRI in rayon manufacturing workers. Occup. Environ. exposures. Folia Med. Cracov, 1993; 34(1-4): 29-47.
Med., 2004; 61: 225-232. 28. Stanosz S, Jastrebska M, Chlubek D, Chukwu P. Effect of carbon
11. Egeland GM, Burhart GA, Schnorr TM, Hornung RW, Fajen JM, Lee ST. disulphide on platelet aggregation in women. Med Pr., 1992;
Effects of exposure to carbon disulphide on low-density lipoprotein in 43(6): 493-497.
cholesterol concentrations and diastolic blood pressure. Br. J. Ind. Med., 29. Stanosz S, Kuligowski D, Pieleszek A. Evaluation of relationship
1992; 49: 287-293. between concentration of serotonin in plasma and blood platelets
12. Vanhoorne M, De Bacquer D, De Backer G. Epidemiological study of the and hypertension in women chronically exposed to carbon
cardiovascular effects of carbon disulphide. Int. J. Epidemiol., 1992; 21: disulphide. Med Pr., 1995; 46(2): 137-40.
745-752. 30. , . : ,
13. Stanosz S, Kuligowski D, Zuk E, Rzechula D, Kosciuszkiewicz B, Chlubek 1984: 62. [Dobreva , Meshkov . Atlas of Hematology:
D. The pattern of some lipid fractions in the serum of women chronically Anemias, 1984: 62 (in Bulgarian)].
exposed to carbon disulphide. Ind. Health, 1994; 32: 183-186. 31. .
14. Stanosz S, Kuligowska E, Kuligowski D. Coefficient of linear correlation : 5.3
between levels of fibrinogen, antithrombin III, thrombin-antithrombin CS2.
complex and lipid fractions in women exposed chronically to carbon . ,
disulphide. Med Pra., 1998; 49: 51-57. 2004: 79-82. [Dimitrova ND. Assessment of the immunotoxic
15. Swaen GMH, Braun C, Slangen JJM. Mortality of Dutch workers exposed to effects on workers in chemical industry: 5.3 Immunotoxic effects
carbon disulphide. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 1994; 66: 103-110. on workers exposed to CS2. Assessment of the hematological
16. Drexler H, Hubmann M, Hardt R, Goen T. Mondorf W, Lang E, Angerer J, parameters. Dissertation, 2004: 79-82 (in Bulgarian)].
Lehnert G. Carbon disulphide III. Risk factors for coronary heart diseases
in workers in the viscose industry. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health,1995; 67:
243-252.
1. -HBs Table 1. Data from anti-HB titers -RIVM, Finland, Italy and Bulgaria
, , , from the measurements with the reference kit
Titre Bulgaria Netherlands Finland Italy
/ low 3.0 3 8.5 2.6 7.0 0.05 6.9 3.6
/ middle 58.9 3.3 56.4 5.0 50 0.16 72.9 15.4
/ high 398 46.4 404.0 55.8 395 6.5 485.2 40.4
Anti-HBs (IU/l)
Exposed Controls
Before immunization n % n %
( - ) . 40 78.4 34 69.38
( < =10) IU 1 1.96 2 4.08
( > 10 =100) 6 11.76 7 14.28
(>100 ) 4 9.80 6 12.24
(Total) 51 49
3. -HBs T 45 , D Table 3. Anti HBs levels at T 45 of Factory workers EBDC and controls
Anti-HBs (IU/l)
45 1- Exposed Controls
45 days After immunization n % n %
( - ) . / negative 29 56.9 25 56.81
( < =10) IU 3 5.9 3 6.81
( > 10 =100) 7 13.7 6 13.63
(>100 ) 12 23.5 12 27.27
(Total) 51 49
/anti HBs(IU/l)
45 1- Exposed Controls
45 days After 1st immunization
n % n %
( - ) . / negative 29 72.5 25 73.5
( < =10) IU 3 7.5 3 8.8
( > 10 =100) 5 12.5 3 8.8
(>100 ) 3 7.5 2 5.9
(Total) 40 33
4. -HBs 45 , Table 4. Factory workers exposed to EBDC and controls mean anti-HBs
D titters at day 45 after 1st injection
.
.
Mean
n Mean IU/L SD Median SD Median
Group Log IU/L
anti-HBs (min.-max.) (min.-max.)
anti-HBs
30.50 3.42
10 130.30 204.06 3.53 1.84
Exposed (2-539) (0.69-6.29)
14.50 2.64
8 64.75 92.76 3.14 1.56
Controls (4-258) (1.39-5.55)
P 0.515 0.633
HBs IU/L
Exposed Controls
nti HBs IU/l
Before immunization n % n %
( - ) ./ negative 32 60.37 42 82.35
( < =10 ) 4 7.55 0 0
( > 10 =100) 6 11.3 4 7.84
(>100 ) 11 20.75 6 11.76
/ Total 53 51
32- e Discussion
(-) < 10 32 (-) 0 In a multi-centric study conducted in 1999-2000 in the
55- five biggest cities in Bulgaria on total of 11595 healthy
25 people seronegative for HBV markers were 72.54%.
Engerix B.
Table 6. Anti- HBs distribution of the responses 55 days after
6. - HBs 55
first immunization
HBs in IU/l
Exposed Controls
nti HBs IU/l
n % n %
( - ) o./negative 13 39.39 10 31.25
( < =10) IU 5 15.15 4 12.5
( > 10 =100) 7 21.21 15 46.87
(>100 ) 8 24.24 3 9.37
/ Total 33 32
7. -HBs Table 7. Mean absolute values of anti-HBs titters and their logs
55 (55) 55 days after first immunization
n SD Median SD Median
Group Mean IU/L Mean
(min.-max.) (min.-max.)
antiHBs Log IU/L antiHBs
20.31
2.65 1.86 2.85-0.76 4.61
Exposed 22 41.44 41.94 (0.47-100)
17.93 2.88
27 33.26 34.95 2.68 1.57
Controls (0.37-106) (-0.9 - 4.66)
p 0.872 0.961
/ References
1. Environmental Health Criteria 180. Principles and Methods for Assessing 7. Corsini E, Birindelli S, Fustinioni S, De pschale G, Mammone T,
Direct Immunotoxicity Associated with Exposure to Chemicals. Visentin S, Galli CL, Marinovich M, Colosio C. Immunomodulatory
WHO,Geneva,1996. Effects of The Fungicide Mancozeb in Agricultural Workers.
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2005;208:178-185.
2. Olgun S, Gogal RM, Adeshina F et al, Pesticide MIXTURE Potentiate the
Toxicity in Murine Thymocytes. Toxiccology 2004; 196(3): 181-195. 8. Shapira M., E.Zeira,R.Adler, D,Shouval, Rapid seroprotection
against hepatitis B following the first dose of a Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S
3. Pistl J, Kovalkovicova N, Holovska N, et al, Determination of the Immunotoxic vaccine, Journal of Hepatology 2001; 34: 123-127.
Potential of Pesticides on Functional Activity of Sheep leucocytes in vitro.
Toxicology 2003; 188(1): 73-81. 9. Van Loveren H., Van Amsterdam JG, Vandebriel RJ, Rumke HG,
Steerenberg PS, Vos JG. Vaccine-induced antibody responses as
4. Irons RD, Stillman WS, Pyatt DW, et al. Comparative Toxicity of parameters of the influence of endogenous and environmental
Dithiocarbamates and Butadiene Metabolites in Human Lymphoid and factors. Environ Health Perspect 2001; 109: 757-764.
Bone Marrow Cells. Chem. Biol Interact 2001;, 135-136: 615-625.
10. Kojouharova M., P.Teoharov, N.Vladimirova, S.Zlatev, I.Haydushka,
5. Pyatt DW, Gruntmeir J, Stillman WS, Irons RD, Dimethyldithiocarbamate M.Atanasova, M.Sredkova, V.Grigorova, P.Sotirova, H.Djeneva,
Inhibit in Vitro Activation of Primary Human CD4+ T lymphocytes. B.Dimitrova, V.Rusev and I.Ivanova, Seroepidemilogical study on
Toxicology 1998, 128(2), 83-90. hepatitis B infection prevalence in Bulgaria. Clinical Microbiology
and Infection 2002; 8 (suppl.1): 305-306 (Abstract).
6. Colosio C., Barcellini W., Maroni M., Alcini D., Bersani M., Cavallo D.,
Galli A., Meroni P., Pastorelli R., Rizzardi G.P., Soleo L. and Fo V. 11. Kojouharova M., P.Teoharov, T.Bahtchevanova, I.Maeva,
Immunomodulatory effects of occupational exposure to Mancozeb. Arch A.Eginlian, M.Deneva, Safety and Immunogenicity of a yeast-
Environ. Health 1996; 51: 445-451. Derived recombinant Hepatitis B Vaccine in Bulgarian Newborns.
Infection 2001; 29 (6):342-344.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is one of the significant issues of global
. public health.
The aim of this study is to analyze the prevalence of some
risk factors and indicators for osteoporosis among the
Bulgarian population and to assess their impact on bone
status through ultrasound osteodensitometry.
. Methods: A total of 4542 individuals (4390 women and
: 4542 (4390 152 ) 152 men, mean age 48,89,7) were investigated using the
48,89,7 . Bulgarian version of the One-minute osteoporosis risk
test. Ultrasound osteodensitometry was used to examine
( ). 4524 of the investigated individuals (150 men and 4369
4524 women).
(150 4369 ). Results: About half of the investigated individuals reported
: the presence of one or more risk factors 57.9% men and
57.5% women. For the women hormonal factors were
, 57.9% 57.5% . leading, followed by family predisposition to osteoporosis
, and the main indicator for osteoporosis one or more
fractures at minimal injury, while for the men the leading
triad included smoking, positive family history, one or
, more fractures at minimal trauma. In general osteoporosis
, , was found in 7.8%, osteopenia in 26.0%, and normal
. bone mass in 66.2% of the sample with statistically
7.8%, significant differences between the genders (P<0.001).
26.0%, 66.2% , The results from the logistic regression showed that the
(P<0.001). determinants of osteoporosis risk were: female gender
, (OR 4,165; 95CI=2,588-6,702), age above 50 (OR
: (R 4,165; 14,454; 95CI=8,008-26,088), number of risk factors (OR
95CI=2,588-6,702), 50 . (R 14,454; 95CI=8,008- 1,854; 95CI=1,622-2,119).
26,088), (R 1,854; 95CI=1,622- Conclusion: The early identification of the risk
2,119), constellation in the various age periods of men and women
: will provide a scientific basis for targeted intervention
approaches that will lead to reduction of individual and
population level of risk for osteoporosis and related
, fractures.
. Key words: osteoporosis, risk factors, quantitative
ultrasound densitometry, T-score
: , ,
, -
Osteoporosis is one of the significant medical and social
issues of the new millennium. It is a skeletal disease,
characterized by low bone mass and abnormal structure
, of bone tissue, leading to increased bone fragility and
, an increased risk of fractures (1,2,3). Hip and vertebral
(1,2,3). fractures are most frequent and reduce life expectancy,
- leading to disability and impaired quality of life (3,4,5).
()
Age groups(years)
<30 31-40 41-50 51-60 >60
n 2 6 16 36 24
NO RF
% 66,7 50,0 64,0 60,0 53,3
1-3 /RF n 1 6 9 24 20
Men
% 33,3 50,0 36,0 40,0 44,4
> 4 /RF n 1
% 2,2
n 128 483 926 822 108
NO RF
% 76,2 70,4 60,1 52,5 32,7
1-3 /RF n 40 203 607 724 208
Women
% 23,8 29,6 39,4 46,2 63,0
> 4 /RF n 7 21 14
% 0,5 1,3 4,2
30
% 25,5
23,2
25 22,4
21,5
19,4
18,9
20
15
10,2 11,2
10,2
10
6,1 6,5 5,1 6 6,1
4,1
5 2,1
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
*
RF*
Males Females
100% 82,70%
80% 65,60%
/Males
60%
26,40%
40% /Females
8,00% 14,70%
20% 2,70%
0%
Osteoporosis Osteopenia Normal bone mass
( )
Age groups (years)
Early menopause (34.0%), low-trauma fractures (36.7%),
followed by family history of osteoporosis (23.7%) and
-
height reduced by more than 3 cm (23.2%) were the
most important risk factors for women with osteoporosis.
, ,
Women with osteopenia showed the same risk profile,
,
but with 1,4 to 2 times lower prevalence of RF, respec-
(P<0.01) . 3.
3. Table 3. Prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in subjects
with different risk profile
Osteoporosis Osteopenia Normal
n 10 73
NO RF % 12,0 88,0
Men n 4 11 45
% 6,7 18,3 75,0
One or more RF
n 92 512 1849
Women
/ multiple regression model ANOVA
/regression equation R R 2
F
/ References
of future fractures: A summary of the literature and statistical
1. . , 2000.
synthesis. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15; 4: 721-39.
, , 17-20./ Report on Osteoporosis in EU, 2000.
10. Geusens P, Dinant G. Integrating a gender dimension into
2. National Institutes of Health. Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis and
osteoporosis and fracture risk research. Gend Med. 2007;4
Therapy. Consensus Development Conference Statement. March 27-29,
Suppl B:S147-61.
2000. Available at: http://consensus.nih.gov/2000/2000Osteoporosis111h
11. Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R. Bone acquisition in adolescence. In:
tml.htm. (Accessed Sept 9, 2008).
Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey J, eds. Osteoporosis. San Diego:
3. Bone Health and Osteoporosis: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville,
Academic Press; 1996, 465476.
MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office
12. Nguyen TV, Blangero J, Eisman JA. Genetic epidemiological
of the Surgeon General; 2004. Available at: http://www.surgeongeneral.
approaches to the search for osteoporosis genes. J Bone Miner
gov/library/bonehealth/content.html. (Accessed Sept 9, 2008).
Res. 2000, 15;3: 392-401.
4. Bonnick, SL. Osteoporosis in men and women. Clin Cornerstone.
13. Ralston SH. Genetics of osteoporosis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2007.66;
2006;8:2839.
2:158-65.
5. Cummings SR, Melton LJ III. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic
14. Cooke R, Sawyer SM. Eating disorders in adolescence. An
fractures. Lancet 2002; 359:1761-1767.
approach to diagnosis and management. Aust Fam Physician.
6. Boyanov M, Poivanov P. Epidemiology of osteoporosis in Bulgaria.
2004; 33; 1-2:27-31.
Bulgarian Journal of Osteoporosis. 2001, 1: 2-16.
15. Fenichel RM, Warren MP. Anorexia, bulimia, and the athletic
7. Manolova A. Osteoporosis risk factors in Bulgarian adult population.
triad: evaluation and management. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2007;
Application of MSD questionnaire for osteoporosis risk evaluation.
5; 4:160-4.
Bulgarian Journal of Osteoporosis. 2004, 2: 12-23
16. Ward KD, Klesges RC. A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette
8. Kanis J.A. and Gluer C.C. for the Committee of Scientific Advisors, IOF.
smoking on bone mineral density. Calcif-Tissue-Int. 2001; 68;5:
An Update on the Diagnosis and Assessment of Ostporosis with
259-70
Densitometry. Osteoporosis Int.2000, 11: 192-202
17. Tansavatdi K, McClain B, Herrington DM. The effects of smoking
9. Klotzbuecher C, et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk
on estradiol metabolism. Minerva Ginecol. 2004; 56; 1:105-14.
Abstract
UV UV The protection against UV rays is determined by the
. incorporated UV filters in cosmetic products. The content of
UV filters is strictly regulated by European and Bulgarian
. legislation. Strict control is needed for the observation of
. UV , these regulations. For separation and determination of
- UV filters in their combined presence in sunscreens high
, performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods
. with highly effective liquid chromatography were mainly
- used.
UV , The aim of this study was to establish the real content of
UV filters, indicated on the labels by producers and in the
dossier of Bulgarian sun protection products, as well as
. the compliance with legislation requirements.
18 The study was conducted on 18 Bulgarian sunscreens
. produced by four Bulgarian companies. For separation
, and determination of all UV filters contained in tested
UV sunscreens HPLC methods with high effective liquid
chromatography and spectrophotometric methods
(HPLC) - developed and validated at the National Center for Public
. Health Protection (NCPHP) were used.
56 UV 18 A total of 56 UV filters in 18 samples of cosmetic products
. were tested. The results obtained showed a discrepancy
UV , 34 of the established real content of UV filters in 34 (60,7%)
(60,7%) ( 56), 3 of all tests (a total of 56), as in 3 of them (5,3%) UV filters
(5,3%) UV , 22 (39,3%) - - were not detected, in 22 (39,3%) they were lowered
40,76%, 9 than the declared ones in the formulation by average of
(16,1%) - - 23,5%. 40,76%, and in 9 (16,1%) higher by average of 23,5%.
These data show the lack of strict control on the observa-
UV tion of formulations on behalf of the producers for the in-
- corporation of UV filters, homogenization of the products
, , as well as ascertainment of the stability of UV filters in
UV cosmetic products. The conduction of similar studies is
. necessary for the regulatory bodies in order to avoid the
above mentioned discrepancies.
. Independently of the fact that the received concentrations
, do not exceed the maximum admissible concentrations
adopted by European and Bulgarian legislation each de-
, , creased incorporation, absence or overdosing versus the
stated formulation leads to a change in the factor of sun
UV protection against UV rays declared on the label and mis-
, - leads the consumers which can cause a risk for damages
. at long-term sun exposure.
UV , %; ( - + %)
Content of UV filter in %, deviation from the declared one in the formulation ( - + %)
1, .4
2-Phenyl
benzimidazole-5-Sulfonic
Butyl Octocrylene Homo-
Octyl Methoxy Octyl Acid Titanium
Octyl Triazone Oxybenzone Methoxydibenzo- salate
cinnamate Salicylate 2-Phenyl benzimidazole-5- Dioxide
ylmethane
. Sulfonic Acid and its sodium
. - .
salt
Sunscreen
Incorporated
Detected
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Detected
Incorporated
Deetcted
Incorporated
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1 / /
SPF 30 3,0 2,96 6,0 5,58 4,5 5,58 4,5 5,26 5,23
4,89
1 - - - - - - - -
B1 / sun protection lotion / high -1,3% -7% +24% +16,9% +6,9%
protection SPF 30
1 /
/ 1,0 0,90 3,0 4,38 5,0 5,40
2 - - - - - - - - - - 22 3,2
B1 / Sun protection cream for
2009
-10% +46 % +8 %
face / high protection
4 /
/
7,0 6,23 3,0 2,98 8,0 7,20 4,0 4,45 5,0 4,5
16 SPF 50
- - - - - - - -
B4 / Aloe Vera sun protection +11 % -0,7% -10% +11,3% -10 %
cream / high protection SPF 50
4 /
- +
/
9,0 7,59 4,5 3,89 9,0 9,31 4,0 4,03
SPF 30
17 - - - - - - - - - -
B4 / Sun protection milk for -15,7% -13,6% +3,4% +0,8%
kids with D-panthenol + herbal
Vol. 1, N 4
, ,
/
1,53 6,0 5,66 3,0 2,71 5,5 5,81 3,5 3,62 -
SPF 20 2,0
18 - - - - - - -
B4 / Sun protection face cream -23,5% -5,7% -9,7% +5,6% +3,4%
Oct. - Dec.
with rose water, vitamin E, shea
butter and macadamia nut oil /
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
UV , %; ( - + %)
1, .4
Content of UV filter in %, deviation from the declared one in the formulation ( - + %)
Butyl Methoxydiben
Octyl Methoxycinnamate Oxybenzone Octocrylene Titanium Dioxide
zoylmethane
. - .
Sunscreen
Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected
2 / /
3 5,0 3,86
- - - - - - - -
B2 / intensive sun (tanning) oil / low -23%
protection
2 / /
SPF 8
2,0 1,54 0,6 0,45
4 - - - - - -
- 23 % - 25 %
B2 / sun protection milk / low protection
SPF 8
2 / /
SPF 12
2,0 1,84 0,6 0,40
5 - - - - - -
B2 / sun protection milk / low protection -8% - 33 %
SPF 12
2009
2 / /
SPF 16
2,3 1,65 1,0 0,50
6 0,3 - - - -
B2 / sun protection milk / medium - 28,2 % - 50 %
not available
protection SPF 16
2 / /
SPF 20
2,5 2,5 1,0 0,40
7 0,4 - - - -
0 - 60 %
B2 /sun protection milk / medium not available
protection SPF 20
2 / /
SPF 26
Vol. 1, N 4
3,5 0,94 0,6 0,15 0,5 0,40
9 - - - -
- 73,1 % - 75 % - 20 %
B2 / sun protection milk / high protection
Oct. - Dec.
2 / /
/ SPF 30
3,5 0,93 1,0 0,16 0,5 0,38
10 - - - -
B2 / sun protection face cream /high - 73,4 % - 84 % - 24 %
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
57
protection/ SPF 30
58
UV , %; ( - + %)
Content of UV filter in %, deviation from the declared one in the formulation ( - + %)
Butyl Methoxydiben
Octyl Methoxycinnamate Oxybenzone Octocrylene Titanium Dioxide
zoylmethane
Sunscreen
1, .4
Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected Incorporated Detected
3 / /
SPF 6
2,0 2,14 1,0 0,93
11 - - - -
+7% -7%
. - .
B3 / sun protection lotion / low protection
SPF 6
3 / /
SPF 10
3,0 2,43 2,0 0,75
12 - - - -
B3 /sun protection lotion / low protection - 19 % - 62,5 %
SPF 10
3 / /
SPF 15
4,0 2,97 2,5 3,30 1,0 1,2
13 - - - -
B3 / sun protection lotion / medium - 25,7 % + 32 % + 20 %
protection SPF 15
3 / /
SPF 20
5,0 5,5 3,0 3,54 2,0 1,5
14 - - - -
+ 10 % + 18 % - 25 %
2009
protection SPF 20
3 / /
SPF 30
5,5 5,3 8,6 3,0 2,8
15 - - - - 6,5
B3 / sun protection lotion / high protection - 3,6% +32,3% - 6,6 %
SPF 30
/References
1. 36 30 2005 . 6. ., . , . , . , . ,
(., , . 101 2005 ., . ., . 44 2006 ., .
., . 75 2006 ., . ., . 39 2007 ., . ., UVA UVB : ,
. 106 2007.). / Ordinance 36 of 30 November 2005 for the , , 2007, 33, 14-20. / Uzunova S., M.
requirements for cosmetic products (published in State Gazette, No. 101 Ivanova, . Tachev, D. Chohadjieva, L. Mechkueva, N. Vasileva.
of 2005; amendments and annexes, No.. 44 of 2006; amendment, No. 75 Study on the cosmetic products providing protection against UVA
of 2006; amendments and annexes., No. 39 of 2007; amendments and and UVB rays: Etheric oils, perfumery and cosmetics, Provdiv,
annexes, No.106 of 2007). 2007, 3: 14-20.
2. Kedor-Hackman, E.R.M., M.L. De Lourdes Perez Gonzalez, A.K. Singh, 7. Dutra, E.A., E.R.M. Kedor-Hackman, M.I.R.M. Santoro. Validation
M.I.R.M. Santoro. Validation of a high performance liquid chromatography of a high performance liquid chromatography method for
method for simultaneous determination of five sunscreen in lotion sunscreen determination in cosmetics. Internacional Journal of
preparation. Internacional Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2006; 28:219. Cosmetic Science, 2002; 24:.97.
3. Rosario R., Jose Benito Quintata, Purification Lopez-Mahia, Soledad Muniategui- 8. Salvador A., De la Ossa, M.D., A. Chisvert. Determination of butyl
Lorenzo. Multiclass Determination of sunscreen chemicals in water samples by methoxydibenzoylmethane, benzophenone-3, octyl dimethyl
liquid chromatography. Anal.Chem.,2008; 80(4):1307-1315. PABA and octyl methoxycinnamate in lipsticks. Internacional
4. Dencaunsse L., Audrey Galland, Jean-Luc Clamou, Jerome Basso. Validation Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2003; 25(3): 97-102.
of HPLC method for quantitative determination of Tinosorb S and three 9. Bouzid, S. HPLC/formulation stabilization. Optisol UV Absorber
other sunscreens in a high protection cosmetic product. International improves the retention of organic UV absorbers during solar
Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2008;30:373-382. exposure. Oxonica Commercial Solutions from Nanotechnology
5. Chisvert A., A. Salvador. Determination of water-soluble UV-filters in (2005).
sunscreen sprays by liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 10. Rastogi, S.C. UV filters in sunscreen products - a survey. Contact
A, 2002; 977: 277-280. dermatitis, 2002; 46 (6): 348.
NANOTECHNOLOGY POTENTIAL
HEALTH RISK
1, 2 Ivaylo Hinkov1, Konstanza Angelova2
1 1
University of Chemical Technology
2 2
National Center of Public Health Protection
Abstract
Nanoscience is an interdisciplinary research area and
a system of innovative methods to control matter at
(10-9 m). nanoscale dimensions (10-9 m). Nanotechnology creates
functional systems at molecular scale with applications
, in many sectors of the society, as well as in the new areas
. bionanotechnology and nanomedicine. The significantly
differing properties and exposure to nanomaterials pose
new challenges to evaluate and manage the potential
risk and safety of nanotechnology. Nanoscience and
. nanotechnology key aspects and applications, risk
assessment, interaction of nanomaterials with biological
, , systems and regulatory framework of risk management
are presented.
.
Key words: nanoscience, nanotechnology, bio-
: , , - nanotechnology, nanomedicine, risk assessment,
, , , risk management
Introduction
, Nanoscience as interdisciplinary research area and a system
of innovative methods to control matter at nanoscale
(10-9 m), dimensions (10-9 m) produce new materials and structures
, at atomic, molecular and macromolecular scales with
, properties significantly differing from those at a larger
- (1,2,3). scale (1,2,3). Nanotechnology, as engineering of functional
, systems at molecular scale, relevant to chemistry, biology,
, engineering and medicine, is exponential growing industry
, , . in the world offering a potential for scientific advancement
in many sectors of the society. In addition to applications
of nanotechnology in information technology, electronics
. and energy production new areas as bionanotechnology
, and nanomedicine are developing (1,2). At the same
, time, properties of nanoparticles and respective exposure
(1,2). to nanomaterials pose new challenges to evaluate and
, manage the potential risk and safety of nanotechnology.
Analyses are promoted to create responsible development
of beneficial applications while minimizing the possible
. risk (2,3). The development of nanoscience is the basis
for risk assessment, formulation of regulatory policies
(2,3). and risk management decisions for protection of public
, health (4).
,
(4).
, , Risk assessment
, (.
, The novel and unprecedented number of nanomaterials,
- ..); their potential high reactivity coupled with high mobility
characteristics, as well as the release of nanoparticles
(12,13). into the environment from secondary sources - industrial
manufacturing and consumer products and from intentional
environmental application with secondary ecotoxic effects
on the food chain, create potential ramification of human
, exposure pathways and health risk (14).
,
The conventional environmental and health risk
- ,
assessment cannot be conducted for nanomaterials since
( there is a knowledge gap associated with nanomaterials
) , , characteristics, detection, analysis, release, transport,
transformation in the environment and potential
, toxic effects (6,14, 15). Biological systems encounter
(14). nanomaterials as novel substances without natural
analogs like QD (quantum dots) containing heavy
metals, nanoparticles coated with surfactant, polymer, or
polyelectrolyte. In addition surface coating transformation,
,
biotical or abiotical, affects nanomaterial characteristics,
, ,
eg removing lysophosphatidycholine coating from
, ,
SWCNT reduces nanotube resistance to aggregation.
(6, 14, 15). Investigation of biological effect should consider the
differences in dose-response curves which depend on
, whether the expression of relationship is by mass, number
. QD (quantum dots), of particles or surface area, as well as which parameter is
, relevant to toxicity (16). Concerns exist that toxicological
, . methods are not adequate to assess nanoscale materials
, since their toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics are
, , different. Specific physiologically-based pharmacokinetic
, . (PbPk) or quantitative structure activity relationship
(QSAR) models are needed for prediction of biological
SWCNT ( )
interactions and effects (4). FDA considers that new
.
analytical methods and standard particle characterization
methods should be developed for the adequacy in testing
-, novel biological responses to nanomaterials (4).
, OBrien and Cummins propose a conceptual semi-
, quantitative three-level risk assessment strategy for
(16). , nanomaterials (14). The frame comprises module with
formulation of exposure risk equations (level 1), three
, inter-related modules characteristics, treatment and
behavior (level 2) and exposure scenarios module (level
. 3). Analysis involves input of basic factors as nanoscale
- material, size distribution, aggregation/disaggregation
(PbPk) - status, surface area, surface charge, concentration (eg
(QSAR), ppm, g/m3), transformation, adsorption, redox activity,
(4). exposure scenarios and primary routes of human exposure
(FDA) , inhalation, ingestion and dermal exposure.
Analyses applying probabilistic qualitative risk models
with significant degree of uncertainty, could be converted
(4). to a quantitative risk assessment model after input of
critical exposure points and generation of parameterized
OBrien Cummins - data (14).
1, .4 . - . 2009 BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH Vol. 1, N 4 Oct. - Dec. 63
DISCUSSION
/ References
1. The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering. Nanoscience and & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-
nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. The Royal Society, 2004. C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009: 31-41.
2. CDC / NIOSH (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute 9. Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S,
for Occupational Safety and Health). Progress toward safe nanotechnology Dawson KA. The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological
in the workplace. A Rep. NIOSH Nanotechnology Research Center, 2007. entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st
3. CDC / NIOSH (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute century. Journal Colloid Interface Science 2007; 134-135: 167-
for Occupational Safety and Health). Approaches to safe nanotechnology. 174.
Managing the health and safety concerns associated with engineered 10. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Project on
nanomaterials. 2009. Emerging Nanotechnologies. Consumer Products Inventory, http://
4. FDA/NTF. Nanotechnology. A Report of the US Food and Drug Administration www.nanotechproject.org/inventories/consumer/.
Nanotechnology Task Force. 2007 11. EC (European Commission) Nanomedicine Nanotechology for
5. Oberdrster G, Stone V, Donaldson K. Toxicology of nanoparticles: a historical Health: Strategic research agenda for nanomedicine office for
perspective. Nanotoxicology 2007; 1(1): 2-25. official publications of the European Communities. EC Luxemburg.
6. Metcalfe C, Bennett E, Chappell M, Steevens J, Depledge M, Goss G, 2006, http://cordis.europa.eu/nanotechnology/nanomedicine.htm.
Goudey S, Kaczmar S, OBrien N, Picado A, Ramadan AB. SMARTEN 12. Adlakha-Hutcheon G, Khaydarov R, Korenstein R, Varma R,
Strategic management and assessment of risks and toxicity of engineered Vaseashta A, Stamm H, Abdel-Mottaleb M. nanomaterials,
nanomaterials. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov & J nanotechnology. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I
Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-C:Environmental Linkov & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-
Security. Springer 2009: 95-109. C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009: 195-207.
7. ICON (International Council on Nanotechnology) A review of current practices 13. Emerich DF, Halberstadt C, Thanos C. Role of nanobiotechnology
in the nanotechnology industry phase two report: Survey of current practices in cell-based nanomedicine: A concise review. Journal of
in the nanotechnology workplace. UCSB 2006. Biomedicine & Nanotechnology 2007; 3:235-244.
8. Lynch I, Elder A. Deposition of nanoparticles as a function of their interactions 14. OBrien N, Cummins E. Development of a three-level risk
with biomolecules. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov assessment strategy for nanomaterials. In: Nanomaterials: Risks
and Benefits (eds) I Linkov & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and not dependent upon particle size but on surface characteristics.
Security Ser.-C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009; 161-178. Toxicological Sciences 2007; 95: 270-280.
15. Lowry GV, Casman EA. Nanomaterial transport, transformation, and fate 27. Lockman PR, Koziara JM, Mumper RJ, Allen DD. Nanoparticle
in the environment. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov & surface charges alter blood-brain barrier integrity and permeability.
J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-C:Environmental Journal of Drug Targeting 2004; 12: 635-641.
Security. Springer 2009; 125-137. 28. Brown DM, Wilson MR, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K.
16. Teeguarden JG, Hinderliter PM, Orr G, Thrall BD, Pounds JG. Size-dependant proinflammatory essects of ultrafine polystyrene
Pharmacokinetics in vitro: Dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle particles: a role for surface area and oxidative stress in the enhanced
toxicity assessments. Toxicological Sciences 2007; 95: 300-312. activity of ultrafines. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 2001;
17. Elder A, Lynch I, Grieger K, Chan-Remillard S, Gatti A, Gnewuch H, Kenawy 175: 191-199.
E, Korenstein R, Kuhlbusch T, Linker F, Matias S, Monteiro-Riviere N, 29. Chan-Remillard S, Kapustka L, Goudey S. Nanotechnology. The
Pinto VRS, Rudnitsky R, Savolainen K, Shedova A. Human health risks occupational health and safety concerns. In: Nanomaterials: Risks
of engineered nanomaterials. Critical knowledge gaps in nanomaterial and Benefits (eds) I Linkov & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace
risk assessment. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov & J and Security Ser.-C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009; 53-
Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-C:Environmental 66.
Security. Springer 2009; 3-29. 30. Linkov I, Steevens J, Chappell M, Tervonen T, Figueira JR, Merad
18. Volkheimer G. Hematogenous dissemination of ingested polyvinyl chloride M. Classifying nanomaterial risk using multi-criteria decision
particles. Annals of NY Academy of Sciences 1975; 246: 164-171. analysis. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov
19. Hillyer JF, Abrecht RM. Gastrointestinal persorption and tissue distribution & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-
of differently sized colloidal gold nanoparticles. Journal of Pharmaceutical C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009; 179-191.
Sciences 2001; 90(12): 1927-1936. 31. Satterstrom FK, Arcuri ASA, Davis TA, Gulledge W, Foss Hansen
20. Cross SE, Innes B, Roberts MS, Tsuzuki T, Robertson TA, McCormick P. S, Shafy Haraza MA, Kapustka L, Karan D, Linkov I, Melkonian M,
Human skin penetration of sunscreen nanoparticles : in-vitro assessment of Monica J, Owen R, Palma-Oliveira JM, Srdjevic B. Considerations
a novel micronized zinc oxide formulation. Skin Pharmacology & Physiology for implementations of manufactured nanomaterial policy and
2007; 20: 148-154. governance. In: Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits (eds) I Linkov
21. Elder A, Gelein R, Silva V, Feikert T, Opanashuk L, Carter J, Potter R, Maynard & J Steevens, NATO Science for Peace and Security Ser.-
A, Ito Y, Finkelstein J, Oberdrster G. Translocation of inhaled ultrafine C:Environmental Security. Springer 2009; 329-350.
manganese oxide particles to the central nervous system. Environmental 32. IOM (Institute of Medicine) Nanotechnology in Food Products:
Health Perspective 2006; 114 (8): 1172-1178. Workshop Summary. The National Academies Press, Washington
22. Geiser M, Rothen-Rutishauser B, Kapp N, Schurch S, Kreyling W, Schulz DC. 2009
H, Semmler M, Im Hof V, Heyder J, Gehr P. Ultrafine particles cross cellular 33. EC (European Commission) Communication to the European
membranes by nonphagocytic mechanisms in lungs and in cultured cells. Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social
Environmental Health Perspective 2005; 113: 1555-1560. Committee: Regulatory Aspects of Nanomaterials. Summary of
23. Magrez A, Kasas S, Salicio V, Pasquier N, Seo J, Celio M, Catsicas S, legislation in relation to health, safety and environmental aspects
Schwaller B, Forro L. Cellular toxicity of carbon based nanomaterials. Nano of nanomaterials, regulatory research needs and related measures
Letters 2006; 6(6): 1121-1125. {COM (2008) 366 final}. http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/
24. Lundqvist M, Stigler J, Elia G, Lynch I, Cedervall T, Kenneth A, Dawson KA. com_regulatory_aspects_nanomaterials_2008_en.pdf.
Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with 34. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) Nanotechnology. 2009
possible implications for biological impact. Proceedings of National Academy http://efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_
of Sciences 2008; 105: 14265-14270. 1178680051172.htm
25. Bakshi MS, Zhao L, Smith R, Possmayer F, Petersen NO. Metal nanoparticle 35. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) The Potential Risks
pollutants interfere with pulmonary surfactant function in vitro. Biophysical Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnology on Food and
Journal 2008; 94: 855-868. Feed Safety [1]. 2009 http://www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_
26. Warheit DB, Webb TR, Colvin VL, Reed KL, Sayes CM. Pulmonary locale-1178620753812_1211902361968.htm
bioassay studies with nanoscale and fine-quartz particles in rats: Toxicity is
E : ENDOGENOUS TOXINS:
TARGETS FOR DISEASE TREATMENT
AND PREVENTION
Peter J. OBrien, William Robert Bruce (Editors)
: 2009 Publication Date: October 2009
: Wiley, John & Sons Ltd Publisher: Wiley, John & Sons Ltd
: , 994 . Format: Hardcover, 994 pages
ISBN: 978-3-527-32363-0 ISBN: 978-3-527-32363-0
- SAS/STAT Software [computer program].Version 9.1. - SAS/STAT Software [computer program].Version 9.1.
Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.;2006. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.;2006.
- Javaras KN, Laird NM, Hudson JI, et al. Estimating the prevalence - Javaras KN, Laird NM, Hudson JI, et al. Estimating the
of disease using relatives of case and control probands. COBRA prevalence of disease using relatives of case and control
preprint series. Article 31. Available at: http://biostats.bepress.com. probands. COBRA preprint series. Article 31. Available at:
proxy1.cl.msu.edu:2047/cobra/ps/art31. 2007. (Accessed March 4, http://biostats.bepress.com.proxy1.cl.msu.edu:2047/cobra/
2008.) ps/art31. 2007. (Accessed March 4, 2008.)