Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RELATIVE CLAUSES.
MORPHOLOGY OF RELATIVE PRONOUNS
PEOPLE THINGS
SUBJECT WHO/THAT WHICH/THAT
OBJECT WHOM/WHO/THAT WHICH/THAT
NOUN COMPLEMENT WHOSE OF WHICH/WHOSE
If we omit the words in italics, we learn only that a conductor is a person, a doctor is a
person, and a liar is a person. We would clearly regard such explanations as unsatisfactory, even
though as sentences they are grammatically complete. The persons are defined, or distinguished
from each other by the relative clauses in italics: the relative clauses are defining.
The definition of conductor is no longer simply a person, but a person who collects on a
bus or tram. The relative clause is an essential of the whole definition, and cannot be omitted if the
sentence as a whole is to make useful sense. Similarly, it would be impossible to answer the
following question without the defining relative clause in italics:
Again the answer would be incomplete without the defining relative clause in italics. The
subject of the sentence is no longer simply "a person", but "a person who habitually tells lies".
All these examples show that de defining relative clauses provide an indispensable
definition of the word "person" (called the antecedent -the word to which the relative clause
97
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
relates). They are not separated from the antecedent by commas in writing, nor by a pause in
speech. This is a basic feature of all defining relative clauses.
The relative pronoun that is used only in defining clauses, and can refer to persons or
things. Who for persons and which for things may be used instead:
All the relative clauses here are defining: there are no commas between the antecedents
(and no pauses in speech). Students will find it instructive to note examples of usage in modern
written English, in order to see what pattern of choice emerges in such clauses (i.e. that or who,
that or which).
With regard to the choice of THAT or WHO, both are equally appropriate if the antecedent
is a vague or generalized noun or pronoun:
If, however, the antecedent is more definite or particularized, WHO is far more likely
choice:
With antecedents denoting things, the choice of THAT or WHICH seems more a matter of
individual taste; but there are a few cases where THAT is preferred to WHICH:
The Government has promised to do ALL that lies in its power to alleviate the hardships
of those made homeless by the floods.
This is the FUNNIEST film that has ever come from Ealing Studios.
The FIRST statement that was issued by the press attach at the palace gave very few
details.
98
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
The problem of choosing the appropriate relative pronoun in defining relative clauses very
often does not arise:
The relative clause tells us which book the library didn't have; it defines the antecedent
book; it is a defining relative clause. We may analyze the relative clause thus:
It is a distinctive characteristic of defining relative clauses that the relative pronoun may be
omitted, without any change of meaning in the sentence as a whole, when it is not the SUBJECT
of the relative clause. It not only may be omitted, it very often is, particularly in spoken English:
The same is true of whom in a defining relative clause -it is very often omitted:
Such clauses are called "contact clauses", and are very common in both speech and
writing, as students will soon realize if they examine the constructions they themselves use.
The Victoria Line, which was opened in 1969, was London's first complete new tube for 60
years.
If we omit the relative clause, we are left with the statement "The Victoria Line was
London's first complete new line tube for 60 years". The relative clause gives additional
information about the antecedent, but does not define it: the "Line" in question is already
sufficiently defined by "Victoria".
99
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
The relative clause is in this case called non-defining (or parenthetical), and is enclosed by
commas. Whether we include the clause or not, the meaning of the main clause remains exactly
the same. In fact, the main clause and relative clause could be presented as two separated
statements:
The Victoria Line was London's first complete new tube for 60 years.
It was opened in March 1969.
The Victoria Line (it was opened in March 1969) was London's first complete new tube for
60 years.
The omission or insertion of commas may represent a difference in meaning between two
otherwise identical sentences:
The absence of comma after sister in a implies that "he" has more than one sister; that one
of them in particular is being referred to -the one who works in Geneva. The presence of a comma
in b implies that "he" has only one sister (it is therefore, impossible to define which one), and the
relative clause simply gives more information about her.
A further point of contrast between defining and non-defining clauses is that the relative
pronoun cannot be omitted in non-defining relative clauses, even if it is not the subject of its
clause.
WHOSE
Whose is the only possessive form of relative pronoun in English, and is used to refer to
both persons and things. It is nearly always preferred to the prepositional construction of whom
and is also often preferred to of which:
a. The man whose coat had been stolen immediately reported the theft. (Defining)
b. The damaged ship, whose crew has now been taken off, was listing dangerously when last
seen. (Non-defining)
100
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
When the relative pronoun is the object of a preposition in a defining relative clause, the
preposition is often placed before the relative pronoun that:
It is very unlikely that the alternative forms would be used in sentences a and b. The sentences
would sound forced and unnatural. The alternative form is, however, possible in c, though it
results in greater formality of style.
1. Is the sentence spoken or written? If SPOKEN, the preposition is much more likely to
come at the end of its clause. At the same time, this makes it possible to omit the relative
pronoun.
2. Is the style formal or informal? If INFORMAL the preposition is likely to come at the end
of its clause, even in written English.
There are however two other considerations, which concern the way in which the
preposition functions:
4. The preposition may, on the other hand, represent part of a prepositional noun phrase, and
be entirely independent of the verb in its clause. In this case, the preposition always
precedes the relative pronoun:
101
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
2. Non-defining clauses.
The new hospital, in which the Queen has taken a great personal interest, will be officially
opened in March.
No one puts any faith in the Government's promises, which they have frequently gone back
on in the past.
WHAT
EXERCISES
102
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
Combine each of these pairs of sentences so that the second becomes a non-defining relative
clause.
1. Our television set is always making funny noises. It cost us a lot of money.
2. Mr. Green is going to retire. His students like him very much.
3. A history of the town will be published soon. People know nothing about it.
4. Picasso is known all over the world now. His paintings were not understood at first.
5. The final exams happened to be very easy. I feared them too much.
6. I'm going to visit Brazil. I don't know anything at all about it.
8. We couldn't climb that mountain. Its summit is always covered with snow.
11. My uncle Tom will be arriving tomorrow. You've heard so much about him.
13. I met Arthur Jones. His book on sports sells very well.
103
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
1. Tom had been driving all day. He was tired and wanted to stop.
2. Ann had been sleeping in the back of the car. She felt quite fresh and wanted to go on.
3. Paul wanted to take the mountain road. His tyres were nearly new.
4. Mary didn't know anything about mountains. She thought it would be quite safe to climb
alone.
5. Jack's tyres were very old. He wanted to stick to the tarred road.
6. He gave orders to his lieutenants. The lieutenants passed them on to the soldiers.
7. She said that the men were thieves. This turned out to be true.
8. The matter was reported to the Chief of Police. He ordered us all to be arrested.
10. We slept in the same room as a handcuffed prisoner. His handcuffs rattled every time he
moved.
104
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
12. They rowed across the Atlantic. This had never been done before.
13. The lorry crashed into a bus-load of schoolchildren. Six of them were slightly injured.
14. She refuses to use machines. This makes her work more arduous.
16. The women prayed aloud all night. This kept us awake.
17. The river bed is uneven and you may be in shallow water one moment and in deep water
the next. This makes it unsafe for non swimmers.
18. Mary said that there should be a notice up warning people. Mary's children couldn't swim.
19. Ann said that there were far too many notices. Ann's children could swim very well.
20. He paid me ,1 for cleaning ten windows. Most of them hadn't been cleaned for at least a
year.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
Comedy is, to my mind, the only thing worth writing in this despairing age, provided the
comedy is truly on the side of the lonely, the neglected, the unsuccessful, and plays its part in the
war against the imposing of an arbitrary
code of behaviour upon individual and
unpredictable human beings. There may,
for all I know, be great and funny plays to
be written about successful lawyers,
brilliant criminals, wise schoolmasters , or
families where children can grow up
without silence and without regret. There
are many plays that show that the law is
always majestic or that family life is
simple and easy to endure. Speaking for
myself I am not on the side of such plays
and the writer of comedy must choose his
105
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
side with particular care. He cannot afford to aim at the defenceless, nor can he, like the more
serious writer, treat any character with contempt.
I use comedy because it is a better weapon than frontal attack. I want to give audiences
the shock of recognition in which they see actors reflecting their own behaviour and laugh at it. I
want to open their hearts. Normally they come along expecting to see something serious. But, as
we know, life is not like that, and I don't force the two things apart. In any case it makes for
surprise when you don't know what to expect next. There is the interaction between reality and
illusion, circumstance pulling against fantasy. It gives you that feeling of your stomach turning
over.
John Mortimer.
QUESTIONS
106
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
suitable match was in hospital, Ros was months I could breath normal.@
found within a month, discharged with a new easily. I was told it
and after three weeks healthy heart. would be three
AIt was really months before I could
fantastic,@ she says. play sport, but other
I knew AFor the first time in than that, my life was
Chris was had been very AWe said things like, -quite the opposite, in
supportive, Chris was ALet=s have a heart to fact. Other people
the one for the first person who heart,@ and laughed worry about us so
me really understood about the daft much, it=s a relief to
what I=d been questions people ask be with somebody
Ros still had through,@ says Ros. us. One friend who doesn=t fret.
to have regular check- AHe=d had his thought I=d become AMy mum
ups at hospital. And it operation four years more masculine insists on carrying my
was at one of these earlier for the same because I was given a shopping and she
that she met Chris, the reason as me. He told man=s heart! And we wouldn=t let me ride
man she was to marry. me not to worry, and were both fed up with the rollercoaster when
AI was that I=d soon be doing people asking to see we visited a theme
waiting to see the everything I used to our scars, although it park. I=ve been told
doctor when a man do. was interesting to I=m out of danger, but
walked in,@ she says. AThe doctors discover that even our that means nothing to
AMost of the other had said it was safe to scars were alike -both Mum!@
heart patients were play sport again, but I very neat.@ However,
old, but he was young hadn=t been brave Chris and Ros and Chris do
and handsome, with enough to try. With Ros kept seeing each watch their diet. They
dark, wavy hair. I Chris= encouragement, other regularly. They both have to take
sneaked another look I plucked up the went to the cinema, or medication to stop
as he sat down beside courage to go just for a walk in the their bodies rejecting
me.@ swimming. That was park. AWe enjoy the their hearts, and a
The man at when I really felt I=d simple things in life,@ stomach upset could
Rosalynde=s side was recovered.@ says Chris. AAfter all, make it ineffective.
Chris Lee. Noticing Ros accepted I was confined to a AWe don=t eat eggs,
her blushes, he broke Chris= invitation to wheelchair for six cheese or seafood, but
the ice. dinner, and looked months, so even otherwise we live
AI was forward to hearing walking gives me a normal lives,@ says
amazed to see a pretty more about how he=d Ros.
got his life back APeople find
young woman at the
together. Our lives it hard to believe we
clinic,@ says Chris, 31.
AAnd we soon found AChris had are just didn=t bring our
out that we had a lot been so ill he=d had to illnesses on, but
in common. Not only learn to walk again,@ beginning neither of us drank
had we both had heart says Ros. ABut in just much or smoked.
transplants, but we seven months, he=d buzz.@ Getting a heart virus
both live in Speke, gone from being Ros agrees: was just bad luck.@
near Liverpool, and 6stone weakling to a AWe don=t let little A year after
had been very sporty healthy 10 stone.@ things get us down - they met, Chris
before our The couple=s we=re just glad to be proposed. AI=d never
operations.@ first date was a big alive. But it=s not as if had a serious
AAlthough hit. AChris and I joked we talk about our boyfriend, but I knew
my friends and family a lot,@ recalls Ros. conditions all the time Chris was the one for
107
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
me,@ says Ros. AMy future together. to travel and to have a could be dangerous
illness made me grow ADoctors say there=s family.@ for Ros so she=d be
up quickly and realise no reason we Doctors say closely monitored,
what was important.@ shouldn=t live to a ripe there=s nothing to and she=d have to have
The couple old age,@ says Chris. suggest the couple a Cesarian as a
were married in June AOur lives are just will pass their illness precaution.
this year and look beginning -there=s so on to their children,
forward to a long much to do. We want although pregnancy
AI don=t like Chris. AI know how let risks rule your life. Paul Lewis.
to think of Ros risking badly she wants kids.@ And no matter what Woman=s own
her life to have a AI=m happens, we=ll always September 2 1996
child, but ultimately determined to try,@ be grateful for what
it=s her decision,@ says says Ros. AYou can=t we have.@
QUESTIONS
1. What kind of illness did Ros and Chris have?
2. Where did Ros meet Chris?
3. How old was Ros when doctors discoverd her illness?
4. Why did Chris and Ros feel happy together?
5. What kind of sports do they play?
6. Did they get married? When?
7. Do they want to have children?
8. Are they on a diet? Why? What can=t they eat?
9. Are they medicated? Why?
10.What do people say about them and their illness?
11.Write a composition (of about 80 words) about medicine and technological advances.
Reword the following sentences, using HAVE or GET with a past participle.
108
RELATIVE CLAUSES MMLLDC
109