Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rhetoricalanalysispaperfinal
Rhetoricalanalysispaperfinal
Connie Douglas
UWRT 1104-032
7 February 2017
Latinxs are one of the fastest growing ethnicities in the United States and are the largest
minority group. Despite their large numbers, many Latino students do not pursue a higher
education due to barriers that other students of a different demographic might not face. Latino
students also have to go through obstacles that first generation students have to go through; such
as, affordability, family and work obligations, and lack of information about financial aid and
college life. In the articles, Trends in Latino College Access and Success by Michelle
Camacho Liu and Latinos and College Access: Trends and Future Directions by Maria Estela
Zarate and Rebeca Burciaga, talk about the enrollment and success gap of Latinxs compared to
other ethnicities and barriers that cause the gap to widen. While both articles shared similar
rhetoric, Burciaga and Zarate made a better argument through their use of logos through a wide
array of statistical evidence and they have more experience than Liu thus making them a more
credible source.
In Zarate and Burciagas article, they begin by explaining the demographics of Latinx
college access and success and how it has changed over the years. For example, she wrote that
the college enrollment for young Latinx students rose from sixteen percent to twenty-two percent
while their white counterparts rose from twenty-seven percent to thirty-nine percent. Despite that
growth for Latinx college enrollment, the numbers are largely due to the increase in enrollment
for a community college since Latinos are more likely to attend community college (42 percent)
Melgoza Rodriguez 2
compared to whites (24 percent). (Zarate, 25) They then go on to elaborate on trends in states,
two-year and four-year institutions and undocumented students. They cover a lot of points
regarding college access using logical thinking and statistics. Zarate and Burciaga are both
professors who have years of experience with research along the lines of challenging
educational practices, Latin students educational trajectory and Latino college success.
Liu did a good job covering all the facts like Burciaga and Zarate did, but Zarate and
Burciaga use logos better since they covered a larger array of points than Lui. Liu used plenty of
visual aids to help convey the percent population of Latino growth, of the total state population
and k-12 and postsecondary education. She also utilized a bar graph showing a comparison
institution. Liu obviously conveyed her message using a lot of logos through her visual aids and
statistics. Even though Zarates article was published in Fall of 2010, Lius article was published
Thus, while both articles did a good job covering their topic with logos, Zarate and
Burciagas article was more efficient and diverse in its data, the data is more recent, and they are
more credible due to their experience. A diverse and higher quality content allows the writer to
accurately express the information they want to convey. There are far more numbers in Lius
article but there was more content of equal or higher quality in Zarates article. Zarate and
Burciaga covered several more kinds of key points on the barriers for Latinos that they must
overcome.
Melgoza Rodriguez 3
Work Cited:
Burciaga, Rebeca. Burciaga, Rebeca. Burciaga, Rebeca, San Jose State University, 27 Sept.
2016, www.sjsu.edu/people/rebeca.burciaga/.
Liu, Michelle C. Michelle Camacho Liu. Www.linkedin.com, www.linkedin.com/in/michelle-
camacho-liu-05719061.
Liu, Michelle M. Trends in Latino College Access and Success. Www.ncsl.org, National
www.ncsl.org/documents/educ/trendsinlatinosuccess.pdf.
Zarate, Maria E. Zarate, Estela. Educational Leadership, California State University,
ed.fullerton.edu/edleadership/faculty/zarate-estela/.
Zarate, Maria E, and Rebeca Burciaga. Latinos and College Access: Trends and Future