The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD window, achieving the desired window

requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al. 5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process 14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations. The main key in a successful UBD operation is to maintain the desired UBD
window, achieving the desired window
requires the knowledge of the circulating bottom hole pressure with varying injection rates (both liquid and gas) and
surface
choke pressure, in addition the influx from the reservoir has to be identified so it can be implemented. All the
previous
parameter are the main key for controlling UBD operation, other factors which cannot be controlled are mainly
reservoir and
tubular constraints. The recent advancement in the application of multiphase flow in UBD operation has led to the
development of several softwares that can handle such complex system. The flow models are either mechanistic or
empirical
correlations; in addition, the flow models can be either static or dynamic. Several authors 2,3,4 developed several UBD
flow
models based on empirical correlations. Bijleveld et al.5 developed one the first mechanistic flow models for UBD
operations
in which they predicted the circulation bottomhole pressure with various two-phase flow parameters. Lage et al6,7
proposed a
mechanistic model for flow upward in a concentric annuli. Perez-Tellez et al.8 and Perez-Tellez9 presented a
mechanistic
model for predicting flow behavior and pressure prediction using mechanistic models. The static models can be used
in
designing phase in which the bottomhole pressure window can be planned for various injection rates and choke
pressure. The
most recent models show that the use of mechanistic models has led to better understanding of such complex
phenomenon.
Dynamic models (time dependent) are used to estimate circulating pressure over time using the latest mechanistic
models.
DynaFloDril10,11,12,13 is a transient UBD program which includes several features such as interaction between the
formation
and the wellbore, different wellbore geometries, heat transfer model and several other features, it has been
extensively used
and validated against full scale experimental data. The program proved to predict several processes such as changes
in liquid
and or gas flow rates and changes in choke pressure during coiled tubing and pipe injection process14,15. Jun, et al.16
proposed a
dynamic model for UBD operations.