Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Maimoona Malik
(12204)
2013
I hereby declare that this project is entirely my own work and that any additional sources of
information have been duly cited.
I hereby declare that any Internet sources published or unpublished works from which I have quoted or
draw references fully in the text and in the content list. I understand that failure to do this will result in
failure of this project due to plagiarism.
I understand I may be called for viva and if so must attend. I acknowledge that this is my
responsibility to check whether I am required to attend and that I will be available during the viva
periods.
Signed.
Date.
Name of Supervisor
This study examined the impact of capital structure on profitability of textile sector of Pakistan. A sum
of ten listed companies in stock exchange was put under study for a period of (2010-2012) for this
study I have collected data from financial annual reports and web sites of those companies. Two main
groups of variables were used to point out capital structure i.e. debt ratio, cost of debt and profitability
i.e. net profit ratio. The variables were examined by using cross sectional and time series methodology.
In order to verify the theory, Histogram, Descriptive statistics, scatter plot, correlation and regression
were used of the project. In the correlation capital structure has weak relation and profitability has
weak relation. In regression analysis all independent variables have no effect on profitability.
Keywords: short term assets, long term assets, short term liabilities, long term liabilities and
profitability.
First of all, I am grateful to the Almighty Allah for establishing me to complete this
thesis.
I acknowledge, with gratitude, my debt of thanks to Mam Khansa Iram for her advice
and encouragement. I also thank to my Lecturers, and to all the faculty members of
Department of Commerce for their help and encouragement. I also thank my parents
I also place on record, my sense of gratitude to one and all who, directly or indirectly,
Declaration of Originality I
Abstract II
Acknowledgement... III
Chapter 1: Introduction.. 8
1.1introduction 8
1.2 Purpose statement. 13
1.3 Research Objective.. 13
1.4 Research Question &Hypothesis. 13
1.5 Significance Statement 14
1.6 Terms Definition.. 15
1.7 Conceptual Framework 16
Chapter 2: Literature Review.. 17
Chapter 3: Data/methodology.. 25
3.1 Research paradigm ... 25
3.2 Research Approach .. 26
3.3 Sources of Data... .. 27
3.4 Population and sample.. 27
3.5 Methodology 28
Chapter 4: Analysis ... . 30
4.1 Descriptive Statistics. 30
4.2 Histogram .. 30
4.3 Scattor Plot.. 32
4.4 Correlation... .. 33
4.5 Regression .. 34
1.4.2 Hypothesis:
SHORT TERM
ASSETS
LONG TERM
ASSETS PROFITABILIT
Y
SHORT TERM
LIABILITIES
LONG TERM
Impact of capital structure on profitability
LIABILITIES Page 15
Chapter # 2:
2. Literature Review:
(Sufian & Chong, 2008) Examines the determinants of Philippines banks profitability during the
period 19902005. The purpose of the study was to determine the relation between the well-being of
the banking sector and the growth of the economy. They worked on three variables includes banks,
profitability and Philippines. They collect data from annual bank level data of all Philippines
commercial banks over the period 19902005. The total number of commercial banks in the sample
varied from nine banks in 1990 to 24 banks in 1995. Regression test used for data analysis finally they
found that the size, credit risk, and overhead expensed are negatively related to bank profitability,
while non-interest income and capitalization have a positive impact. (Koak & ok, 2008) Describes
the Ownership structure and profitability of the banking sector. The purpose of the study was to
investigate the relationship between bank ownership and bank profitability in six South-Eastern
European countries. They worked on five variables includes banking, profitability, determinants,
ownership, South-Eastern Europe. They collect data from the Bank Scope database, IFS dataset
provided by IMF and from the EBRD publications. Hausman test was used for data analysis. The
finding of the study was there is a limited difference between the performance indicators for foreign-
owned banks and domestic banks across countries.
3.1.1 Positivism:
Positivist assumes that true knowledge is based on experience of senses and can be obtained by
observation and experiment. Positivistic thinkers adopt scientific methods as a means to generate
knowledge. It is used for knowledge based on: determination or cause and effect thinking, to intent the
ideas into small, discrete set of ideas to test, such as variables that constitutes hypothesis and research
question. Detailed observation and measurement of objective variables that exists out there in the
world and for the testing of theories that is continually refined.
3.1.2 Interpretivism:
Sometimes also called Constructivism, social contructivism and qualitative research. Assumptions
identifies in this paradigm, that individuals seek an understanding of the world in which they live and
work. They develop subjective meanings of their experiences or toward certain objects or things.
Regression is a statistical technique used to find relationships between variables for the purpose of
predicting future values. It includes many techniques for modeling and analyzing several variables,
when the focus is on the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent
variables. More specifically, regression analysis helps one understand how the typical value of the
dependent variable changes when any one of the independent variables is varied, while the other
independent variables are held fixed.
Valid N (listwise) 30
Interpretation:
Descriptive statistics is the discipline of quantitatively describing the main features of a collection of
data. Table one represent the descriptive value of following variables, short term assets, long term
assets, short term liabilities, long term liabilities and return on asset. The minimum value of our data is
varying between ranged from (8.5-1.5), maximum value ranged from (7.3-1.8), mean (4.5-0.06) and
the standard deviation varying between (5.9-0.06). The results shows that is no consistency between
variables.
4.2 Histogram:
Interpretation:
Figure 1 shows the graphical representation of short term assets which has a slope to greater values
and our data is positively skewed and figure 2 shows the graphical representation of long term assets
which has a slope to greater values and our data is positively skewed.
Figur
Figure
Figure
4
3
Interpretation:
Figure 3 shows the graphical representation of short term liabilities which has a slope to greater values
and our data is positively skewed and figure 4 shows the graphical representation of long term
liabilities our data is positively skewed.
Interpretation:
Figure 5 shows the graphical representation of return on asset. Our data is approximately normal
distributed.
Interpretation:
Figure 1 shows that there is positive trend between return on asset and short term assets because the
linear line moves from down to upward and the significant value is more than 0.05(quadratic value is
0.154 and linear value is 0.038) . In figure 2 there is no trend between return on asset and long term
assets because the linear line moves straight and the significant value is more than 0.05(quadratic
value is 0.007 and linear value is 4.14).
Figure
3
Interpretation:
Figure 3 shows that there is positive trend between return on asset and short term liabilities because
the linear line moves from down to upward and the significant value is less than 0.05(quadratic value
is 0.053 and linear value is 0.008). In figure 4 there is positive trend between return on asset and long
term liabilities because the linear line moves down to upward and the significant value is less than
0.05(quadratic value is 0.09 and linear value is 0.064).
Figure
3
4.4 Correlation:
Table 1.1
Table 1.2
N 30 30 30
N 30 30 30
N 30 30 30
4.5 Regression:
Variables Entered/Removed
Model Variables Entered Variables Removed Method
1 long term liabilities, short term liabilities, long term assets, short term assets . Enter
a. Predictors: (Constant), long term liabilities, short term liabilities, long term assets, short term assets
ANOVAs
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Total .106 29
a. Predictors: (Constant), long term liabilities, short term liabilities, long term assets, short term assets
b. Dependent Variable: return on asset
Interpretation:
The value of the coefficient of determinations R square is .257. This shows that the correlation
between the observed values of short term assets, long term assets, short term liabilities, long term
liabilities and the fitted value of the return on asset is 25% percent. The adjusted coefficient of
determination adj. R square shows is adjusted for the degrees of freedom. The value of the adjusted
coefficient of determination adj. R square is not affected. The value of the adjusted coefficient of
determination adj. R square is .149, which shows that 14% variations in profitability.
Coefficients
Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
1. Y= a + b X
5.2 Conclusion:
This study examined the relationship between capital structures on profitability of textile sector of
Pakistan over the period 2010-2012. A sum of ten listed companies in stock exchange was put under
5.3 Implications:
The purpose of this study is to guide both researcher and policy makers, to develop and
implementation of such policies that improve the profitability in textile sector. Secondly, it will
helpful for managers to make new policies, to compete with previous deficiencies and policy gab. For
the investors to make rational decisions. It will assist to make effective strategy and investor will also
get benefits by this.
References:
http://www.investopedia.com/terms
https://www.google.com.pk/?gws_rd=cr&ei=RsgwUrSONoGxtAauyoBI
Harris, Milton, 1987, Dynamic Equilibrium Analysis (Oxford University Press, New York). and
Artur Raviv, 1988, Corporate control contests and capital structure, Journal of Financial
Economics 20, 55-86.
Jensen, Michael C., 1986, Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers,
American Economic Review 76, 323-329.
Baker, Malcolm, and Jeffrey Wurgler, 2000, the equity share in new issues and aggregate stock
Returns, Journal of Finance 55, 2219-2257.
Baker, Malcolm, and Jeffrey Wurgler, 2002, Market timing and capital structure, Journal of
Finance 57, 1-32.
Baker, Malcolm, and JeffreyWurgler, 2002, the market timing theory of capital structure, Journal
of Finance 57, 130.
Bertrand, Marianne, and Antoinette Schoar, 2003, Managing with style: The effect of managers
on firm policies, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 11691208.
Abbasoglu, O. F., Aysan, A. F., & Gunes, A. (2007). Concentration, competition, efficiency and
profitability of the Turkish banking sector in the post-crisis period. Banks and Bank Systems
2(3), 106115.
Impact of capital structure on profitability
Page 39
Akhavein, J., Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). The effects of megamergers on efficiency
And prices: Evidence from a bank profit function. Review of Industrial Organization 12(1),
95139.
Claessens S., Demirguc-Kunt A. and Huizinga H. (2001) How do foreign entry affect domestic
banking markets? Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 25, pp. 891-911
De Haas R. and Van Lelyveld I. (2006) Foreign banks and credit stability in Central and Eastern
Europe. A panel data analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30, pp. 1927-1952.
Arnel, D. and Keane, D., "State Laws Affecting Commercial Bank Branching, Multibank Holding
Company Expansion and Interstate Banking," Issues in Bank Regulation, Autumn 1986, 9, 30-
40.
Bartik, Timothy J., "Business Location Decisions in the United States: Estimates of the Effects of
Unionization, Taxes, and Other Characteristics of States," Journal of Business and Economic
Statistics, January 1985, 3, 14-22.
Ben Naceur S. and M. Goaied. 2001. The determinants of the Tunisian deposit banks
performance, Applied Financial Economics, Vol.11:317-19.
Berger A. 1995. The relationship between capital and earnings in banking, Journal of Money,
Credit and Banking, Vol.27:404-31.
DeAngelo and Masulis, 1980, Optimal Capital Structure under Corporate and Personal Taxation
Journal of Financial Economics. Vol.8
Eli Schwartz, 1959, Theory of Capital structure of the firm The Journal of Finance Vol.14, No.1
Cornett, Marcia M., and Hassan Tehranian, 1994. An examination of voluntary versus
involuntary security issuances by commercial banks: The impact of capital regulations on
common stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 35, pp. 99-122.
Flannery, Mark J., 1981. Market Interest Rates and Commercial Bank Profitability: An Empirical
Investigation, Journal of Finance 36(5).
Lerner, Josh, and Robert P. Merges. 1998. The control of technology alliances: An empirical
analysis of the biotechnology industry. Journal of Industrial Economics 46, no. 2 (June): 125
56.
Bain, J. (1951), The Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American manufacturing,
1936-1940, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 65, p. 293-324.