Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Racialprofiling
Racialprofiling
Joshua Garcia
Ms. Sanchez
ERWC, Period 3
14 October 2016
Racial profiling has become a popular topic in todays society. This topic has been
debated whether racial profiling is truly necessary. Due to past incidents and experiences, I
have concluded that racial profiling is not necessary. Also, racial profiling has the possibility of
violating the 4th amendment, which creates conflict in society and around the world.
Because of racial profiling, false accusations and police brutality have surfaced. Two
officers falsely accused an off-duty chief, who was African American, due to racial profiling. The
two officers had no reason to stop Chief Douglas Zeigler and requested a search. NYPD Chief
Douglas Zeigler states that one officer did not believe the NYPD identification he gave him."
This was a perfect example of racial profiling and false accusation. In the situation, there was no
search for a suspect, which doesnt rationalize the unreasonable search made by the two
officers, but just because he was African American, he was stopped. According to Cassidy Pitt,
she explained that, ...racial profiling and discrimination one time can cause a variety of negative
outcomes Cassidy explains how racial profiling can lead to a conflict, which can lead to
worse outcomes. If racial profiling causes discrimination and negative outcomes, then I believe
it is unnecessary.
Another reason why racial profiling is unnecessary is because it violates the 4th
amendment. According to the US Patriot Act article, there tends to be an imbalance between
many of the grey areas of law and human rights. The grey areas this article pertains to would
be the violation of the 4th amendment. The 4th amendment states that, ...[t]he right of the
people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
Garcia 2
and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
resulted by racial profiling, violates and contradicts the security promised in the amendment.
From the article, Profiling Color, it states that It is perhaps rare that a person acts like a criminal
suspect(Corlett). In this phrase, Corlett shows the realism at work. In reality, it is hard to
depict if a person is a true criminal, but that doesnt mean that racial profiling should be put into
play. I believe that in order to suspect a person, you must have harder evidence than just by the
observation of color. In the end, racial profiling becomes an unneeded approach in certain
situations.
This has become an immense issue because of how wrong and unjustifiable it is. I believe
racial profiling is unnecessary because of the negative outcomes of past incidents or experiences.
I also believe that there are more cons than pros to this issue. Resulting from police brutality to
false arrest, racial profiling has become an epidemic in society and the law department. In
conclusion, I hope for solutions towards this issue because of how avoidable this problem can be.
Works Cited
Garcia 3
Pitt, Cassady. U.S. Patriot Act and Racial Profiling: Are There Consequences of
Corlett, J. Angelo. "Profiling Color." The Journal of Ethics, vol.15, no.1-2, 2010, pp. 21-32.
Natntarajan, Ranjana. "Racial Profiling Has Destroyed Public Trust in Police. Cops Are
Exploiting Our Weak Laws against It." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 15 Dec.
2014,https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/12/15/racial-profiling-
has-destroyed-public-trust-in-police-cops-are-exploiting-our-weak-laws-against-it/?
By Using An NSL, an Agency Has No Responsibility to First Obtain a Warrant or Court Order
before Conducting Its Search of Records. . "Fourth Amendment." LII / Legal Information
Institute. Cornell University Law School, n.d. Web. Accessed on 21 Oct. 2016.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fourth_amendment