CONFLICT MANAGEME!
Definition of Conflict
Conflict in itself is neither good nor bad. ‘The key is how we understand and respond to conflict.
‘The participants in a conflict establish the meaning of conflict with the ultimate results being determined
by the feelings, beliefS, and values of those involved.
Conflict is a state of unresolved differences within an individual, between individuals, an individual and a
_group, oF two or more groups. Conflict of some kind will occur throughout your career. To tum it into a
positive factor, it must be managed in a way that will benefit you and your organization.
Conflict is based on caring, Each of the parties involved in the difficulty desires something. Usually
those involved are frustrated because they cannot get something they believe they need or cannot give
something they believe they should be able to give. It is also necessary that the two parties be locked into
some kind of interdependent relationship, where what one does affects the other.
The simplest way to reduce conflict is to eliminate the relationship, by leaving or by refusing to interact
with the other party. In many situations, however, this is not only impractical, but it may be impossible.
So, leaders must learn how to address and manage conflict.
Types of Conflict
‘The processes of resolving conflict are influenced to a great degree by the situations in which the
conflict occurs, for example within the context of the organization. Three types of possible conflict in an
organization are intrapersonal, interpersonal, and intergroup.
Intrapersonal conflict: An experience that takes place within an individual. It occurs in relation to
temptations to stop dieting as well as in a major decision of getting into better physical shape to get a
00d evaluation report
An individual experiencing guilt as a result of inner conflicts often becomes depressed, irritable, and
restless, However, identifying the actual source of the conflict and distinguishing between what one
wishes to do and what should be done are two steps in managing inner conflict successfully. Wishing
leads to daydreaming and continued conflict, while authentic wanting leads directly to a specific behavior.
‘Thus, when there is a follow-through behavior, an individual feels stronger and more confident; he has
risen to a personal challenge and brought about positive personal change.
Interpersonal conflict: Conflict between individuals in the same organization. It exists whenever people
interact in some way to produce results or achieve goals. Because they differ, however, in many ways,
attitude, personality, values, goals, background, experience, ete, The resultant conflict makes the
attainment of the goals quite difficult. Therefore, learning to make the proper adjustments is an important
factor in managing interpersonal conflict.
Intergroup conflict: Conflict between groups in the same organization. It occurs whenever there is a
contact or interaction between the groups. Three sources of intergroup conflict are: cohesion- “sticking
together” within a group often causes out-group hostility; structure-type of leadership and status of
individuals within a group are factors that increase conflict; power-taking actions which affect others and
urposely influencing the welfare of others produce conflict with less powerful groups. Parties involved
1 conflict, by trying to find solutions acceptable to all, can reduce the dysfunctional aspects of conflict.
143Sources of Organizational Conflict
Five basic sources of organizational conflict are
Competition for scarce resources. Because the vital resources of money, manpower, time,
materials and equipment are limited, allocating them to groups produces conflict, for some groups will
certainly get less than they need or want.
-Inherent conflict. Standardized procedures, rules, and policies that regulate behavior tend to
reduce the likelihood of conflict. But at the same time, resistance to the control that they impose is
fostered. Moreover, in a complex organization the number of levels of authority may create problems that
increase the potential for conflict.
Line-staff relationships. The differences of the task responsibilities of line and staff members,
while enabling them to accomplish their respective tasks, also increases the likelihood of conflict between
them.
Differences in goals and values. Groups within an organization often find it difficult to agree on
action plans because they usually develop different goals and objectives. Similarly, many conflicts arise
because some believe that a popular value should be applied to all situations, thus exceeding those whose
values are different.
Organizational ambiguities. Conflict may occur when goals are questionable and roles are not
clearly defined. In addition, adequate standing operating procedures (SOPs) or nonsystematic approaches
to mission planning and problem solving may also increase conflict.
Functions of Conflict
Conflict serves many functions in organizations. Here are but a few.
Conflict establishes identity. Through conflict, individuals and groups clearly establish their
positions on issues.
Conflict serves as a safety valve to hold the group together. Through conflict, individuals and
groups “let off steam” which in turn enhances the communication process leading to
better understanding of the issues within the group.
Conflict increases group cohesion. When there’s a higher level of communication brought
about by conflict, groups strengthen and become closer.
Conflict tests the strength of individuals and groups. Power struggles are inevitable in an
organizational setting. Through conflict the question of “Who has the real power in
our organization?” is resolved.
Conflict spurs needed change. The commencement and resolution of conflict issues identify
‘weak areas in an organization which then hastens resolution/elimination of those
problems which might not have been considered if it weren't for the conflict.
Conflict mobilizes energy. This concept adds credence to the old adage “I work best under
pressure.” When there's conflict in an organization, the pressure members feel causes
them to work at greater efficiency and fervor.
Conflict causes competition 10 improve performance. Conflict causes some organizations,
groups, and individuals to “try to out-do the others” or to demonstrate competence.
Conflict enhances communication. As discussed above, the communication process improves
because of the higher level of information exchange and there’s a higher level of
understanding,
44Conflict ends non-productive associations. When differences of opinion or ideals aren’t
addressed or resolved, the resulting association is distant and useless to the
organization. The unresolved situation actually causes the organization to be
considerably less than its ultimate potential. Through conflict resolution, these issues
can be addressed to increase communication and understanding,
Dealing with Conflict
There are times when we have all been in conflict situations and we have experienced a variety of ways in
which the parties involved deal with the conflict. The following five approaches are ways in which we
tend to deal with the conflict and each approach is appropriate depending upon the situation.
1, DENIAL/AVOID/WITHDRAW (THEME - “Leave Well Enough Alone”)
Use if. The issue or timing is not critical. A cooling off period is required for one or both of
the parties involved. There is a threat of violence or when more information is
required to settle the conflict
Do not use if. The situation requires immediate resolution or when one party remains
frustrated by the avoidance of the issue.
2. COMPETITION/POWER (THEME - “Might Makes Right”)
Use if. Swift action is needed in resolving the conflict. The issue is important but perhaps
unpopular. Its vital to the organization, When you know you are right, or when
there is a need to protect against people who take advantage of non-competitive
behavior.
Do not use if: Concern for the parties involved are not clear. Consequences of action taken
have not been considered.
3. ACCOMMODATION (THEME - “Kill Your Enemies With Kindness”)
Use if. You are wrong. To allow for a better position to be heard. The preservation of the
relationship is more important than the issue at hand. Continued competition would
damage your case.
Do not use if. The issue is significant and must be resolved sooner or later.
4, COMPROMISE/NEGOTIATION (THEME -
Split The Difference”)
Use if. The goals are of moderate importance. Both parties involved feel a compromise would
help in resolution. There is equal power among the parties but each are committed to
mutually exclusive goal. A temporary solution is required as a step toward resolution
of a complex issue.
Do not use if. Only one party is willing to give up something. If negotiation is not possible by
‘one party.
5. COLLABORATION/INTEGRATION/CONSENSUS (THEME - “Two Heads Are Better Than
One”)
Use if: There are shared values or goals. Time is available and the power among the parties is
balanced. When there is effective communications and the concerns are too important to
145compromise, If there is a requirement to merge
a common problem.
Do not use if. There is no balance of power between the parties. ‘The goals or values are not
shared by both parties, or poor communications exist between the parties involved.
ights from different perspectives on
DEALING WITH CONFLICT
(This model depicts how I deal with conflict between myself & others)
COMPETE 7
Assertive
(Dominate) COLLABORATE
(Integrate)
ME /
(My desire to COMPROMISE
satisfy my own (Share)
concerns)
DENY
AVOID
WITHDRAW
(Neglect) ACCOMMODATE
(Appeasement)
Unassertive
YOU
(My desire to
Uncooperative satisfy your Cooperative
concerns)
Reprinted ftom The Handbook of Industrial & Organization Psychology, edited by M.D. Dunnett, a figure dealing with conflict
by Ken Thomas, p. 900
146