2010
The Mirror and the Lamp:
ROMANTIC THEORY AND THE CRITICAL TRADITION
By M. H. ABRAMS:
Is must go farther sill: that sonl must Become
its own betrayer, its own deliverer, the one
‘activity, the mirror turn lamp.
wrotsane buTtaR years
OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
London . Oxford : New York‘OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
Oxford London Glasgow
New York Toronto Melbourne Wellington
Nairobi Dares Salam Cape Town
Kuala Lumpur Singapore Jakarta_-Hong Kong Tolyo
Delhi Bombay Caleutea Madras Karachi
To Ruth
ISBN. 9TB.O-19-s014716
Copyright 1953 by Oxford University Press, Ine
Library of Congress Catalogue Card Number: 53-7616
First published by Oxford University Press, 1953
First issued as an Oxford University Press paperback, 1971
PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAPreface
‘Tus noymorseexr oF trans rusony in the lifetime of Coleridge was to a
suprising extent the making of the modem ctiical mind. There were many
important differences between, let us say, Horace’s Art of Poctry and the
clam of Dr. Johnson, but there was also a discernible continuity in
premises, aims, and methods. This continuity was broken by the theories of
romantic writers, English and Germans ané thei innovations include many
of the points of view and procedures which make the characteristic dif.
ences beeween traditional criticism and the criticism of our own time, in-
cluding some criticism which profeses to be anti-romantic,
‘The primary concern of this book is with the English theory of poetry,
and to a lesser extent of the other major ats, daring the first four decades
of the nineseenth century. It streses the common orientation which justifies
us in identifying a specifically ‘romantic’ criticism; but not, T trust, at the
cost of overlocking the many important diversities among the writers who
concerned themselves with the nature of postry or art, its psychological
genes, its constitution and kinds, ts major criteria, and its relation to other
Jmporant human concerns. The book deals, for the most part, with the
inal and enduring critics of the time, rather than with the runathe-
rill reviewers who often had a more immediate though shorterlived in-
uence on the general reading public.
In order to emphasize the pivoeal position of the age in the general history
of eriticiom, I have treated English romantic theory in a broad intellectual
context, and I have tried to keep constantly in view the background of
cighteenth-century aesthetics from which romantic aesthetics wat in part a
development, and agsinst which it was, still more, « deliberate reaction. I
have described some of the relations of English critical theory to foreign
thought, especially to the richly suggestive German speculations of the age,
beginning with Herder and Kant, when Germany replaced England and
France a the chief exporter of ideas to the Western world, T have also
moved freely in time, going back to the Greek and Roman origins of aes-