Professional Documents
Culture Documents
564 WK 2 HW
564 WK 2 HW
Lists of pronouncements: On May 19, 2004, the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) published a
single volume of its official pronouncements. These pronouncements would be applicable from 1 January, 2005.
The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Bound Volume 2004 provides the complete
consolidated text of the latest version of the IFRS. International Accounting Standards (IASs) and
Exercise 1. A company incurred the following costs related to the production of inventory in the current year:
The cost of materials included abnormal waste of $10,000. What is the cost of inventory in the current year?
a. $190,000.
b. $205,000.
c. $215,000.
Exercise 4. On January 1, Year 1, an entity acquires a new machine with an estimated useful life of 20 years for
$100,000. The machine has an electrical motor that must be replaced every five years at an estimated cost of
$20,000. Continued operation of the machine requires an inspection every four years after purchase; the
inspection cost is $10,000. The company uses the straight-line method of depreciation. What is the depreciation
a. $5,000.
b. $5,500.
c. $8,000.
TOTAL = $10,000
S.A. Harrington Company is a U.S.-based company that prepares its consolidated financial statements in
accordance with U.S. GAAP. The company reported income in 2011 of $5,000,000 and stockholders equity
The CFO of S. A. Harrington has learned that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is considering
requiring U.S. companies to use IFRS in preparing consolidated financial statements. The company wishes
to determine the impact that a switch to IFRS would have on its financial statements and has engaged you to
prepare a reconciliation of income and stockholders equity from U.S. GAAP to IFRS. You have identified
the following five areas in which S. A. Harringtons accounting principles based on U.S. GAAP differ from
IFRS.
1. Restructuring
2. Pension plan
3. Stock options
4. Revenue recognition
5. Bonds payable
The CFO provides the following information with respect to each of these accounting differences.
Restructuring Provision
The company publicly announced a restructuring plan in 2011 that created a valid expectation on the part
of the employees to be terminated that the company will carry out the restructuring. The company
estimated that the restructuring would cost $300,000. No legal obligation to restructure exists as of
Pension Plan
In 2009, the company amended its pension plan, creating a past service cost of $60,000. Half of the past
service cost was attributable to already vested employees who had an average remaining service life of 15
years, and half of the past service cost was attributable to nonvested employees who, on average, had two
Stock Options
Stock options were granted to key officers on January 1, 2011. The grant date fair value per option was
$10, and a total of 9,000 options were granted. The options vest in equal installments over three years:
one-third vest in 2010, one-third in 2011, and one-third in 2012. The company uses a straight-line method
Revenue Recognition
The company entered into a contract in 2011 to provide engineering services to a long-term customer over
a 12-month period. The fixed price is $250,000, and the company estimates with a high degree of
Bonds Payable
On January 1, 2010, the company issued $10,000,000 of 5 percent bonds at par value that mature in five
years on December 31, 2014. Costs incurred in issuing the bonds were $500,000. Interest is paid on the
bonds annually.
Required
Prepare a reconciliation schedule to reconcile 2011 net income and December 31, 2011 stockholders
equity from a U.S. GAAP basis to IFRS. Ignore income taxes. Prepare a note to explain each adjustment
4. (Doupnik 231)
2011
$5,000,0
2011
$40,000,
Restructuring. Under U.S. GAAP, the restructuring is not recognized in 2011 because a legal obligation does not
yet exist.
Under IAS 37, a restructuring provision and offsetting expense in the amount of $300,000 would be recognized
IFRS income would be $300,000 less that U.S. GAAP income in 2011, and stockholders equity at year-end
2011 under IFRS would be less than under U.S. GAAP by the same amount.
Pension Plan. Under U.S. GAAP, the prior service cost is amortized over the remaining service life of the
employees. Expense recognized in 2011 is $4,000 [$60,000 / 15 years]. The cumulative expense recognized
Under IAS 19, the prior service cost attributable to the vested employees would have been expensed in 2010
$30,000 [50% x $60,000]. The prior service cost attributable to non-vested employees would be expensed over
the three remaining years until vesting. Expense recognized in 2011 would be $10,000 [$30,000 / 3 years]. The
cumulative expense recognized since the plan was changed is $50,000 [$30,000 + ($10,000 x 2 years).
IFRS income in 2011 would be $6,000 less than U.S. GAAP income, and stockholders equity at year-end 2011
Stock Options. The total compensation cost related to the stock options is $90,000. Under U.S. GAAP,
compensation expense would be recognized at the rate of $30,000 per year, for a total cumulative expense at
Installment Compensation
Cost per
Installment Compensation Expense 2010 Compensation Expense 2011 Compensation Expense 2011 1 $30,000
$30,000 $ $ 2 $30,000 15,000 15,000 3 $30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 $90,000 $55,000 $25,000 $10,000
Compensation expense in 2011 would be $25,000 and cumulative compensation expense would be $80,000.
IFRS income would be $5,000 larger than U.S. GAAP income in 2011, but IFRS stockholders equity would be
$20,000 smaller.
Revenue Recognition. No revenue would be recognized on this service contract under U.S. GAAP because the
Under IFRS, the company would use the stage of completion method to recognize service revenue of $75,000
In 2011, IFRS income would be $75,000 larger than under U.S. GAAP; at December 31, 2011, IFRS
stockholders equity also will be $75,000 larger than under U.S. GAAP.
Bonds Payable. Under U.S. GAAP, $600,000 would be recognized as expense in 2010 and 2011 related to the
bonds payable: $500,000 interest expense [$10,000,000 x 5%] and $100,000 bond issuance expense [$500,000 /
5 years]. The total reduction in retained earnings as of December 31, 2011 would be $1,200,000.
Under IFRS, the bond issuance costs reduce the carrying amount of the bonds to $9,500,000, and the effective
interest rate is determined to be 6.193% [$9,500,000 cash inflow on January 1, 2010; $500,000 cash outflow on
December 31, 2010 2014; and $10,000,000 cash outflow on December 31, 2014]. Interest expense in 2010 is
$588,335 [$9,500,000 x 6.193%]. Interest expense in 2011 is $593,806 [($9,500,000 + ($588,335 - $500,000)) x
6.193%]. The total reduction in retained earnings as of December 31, 2011 would be $1,182,141. In 2011, IFRS
income would be $6,194 [$600,000 - $593,806] larger than U.S. GAAP income. Stockholders equity at
December 31, 2011 is $17,859 [$1,200,000 - $1,182,141] larger under IFRS than U.S. GAAP. Note: The
adjustments related to interest expense on bonds payable will differ depending on rounding of the effective
interest rate. For example, if the effective interest rate is rounded to 6.2%, interest expense under IFRS would
be $589,000 [$9,500,000 x 6.2%] in 2010 and $594,518 [($9,500,000 + ($589,000 - $500,000)) x 6.2%] in
2011. In 2011, IFRS income would be $5,482 [$600,000 - $594,518] larger than U.S. GAAP income.
Stockholders equity at December 31, 2011 would be $16,482 [$1,200,000 - $1,183,518] larger under IFRS than
U.S. GAAP