PROGRAMA

TEORIA DE LAS RELACIONES

INTERNACIONALES.

3 CURSO.
GRADO RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES.
CURSO 2012-2013

DEPARTAMENTO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL

PBLICO Y RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES.
(ESTUDIOS INTERNACIONALES)

Profesor. Dr. David Garca Cantalapiedra.

djgarcia@pdi.ucm.es
 1. Introduccin. Las Teoras de Relaciones Internacionales y el sistema
internacional.

Roberts, Adam. International Relations after the Cold War. International

Affairs vol. 84: n2, 2008.

Jervis, Robert. Unipolarity. A Structural Perspective . World Politics, Vol.

61, No. 1 (January 2009). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/v061/
61.1.jervis.html

1.1. Gobernanza, Poder, legitimidad y autoridad

Kehohane, Robert. Governance in a Partially Globalized World. American

Political Science Review. N 1. March 2001.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3117625.pdf

Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Soft Power and American Foreign Policy. Political Science
Quarterly, Vol. 119, No. 2 (Summer, 2004), pp. 255-27
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/20202345.pdf?acceptTC=true

Lake, David. "Escape from the State of Nature: Authority and Hierarchy in
World Politics," International Security, 32/1 (Summer 2007): 47-79.
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/international_security/v032/32.1lake.html

2. EL REALISMO.

2.1. EL REALISMO CLSICO

Michael C. Williams. Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans

Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power Politics.
International Organization, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Autumn, 2004), pp. 633-665
www.jstor.org/stable/3877799

1. EL NEOREALISMO Y EL REALISMO ESTRUCTURAL.

-Waltz, K. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. Vol.
25, n 1. Summer 2000. p. 5-41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2626772

2.3. EL REALISMO OFENSIVO

- Mearsheimer, John. The False Promise of International Institutions.

International Security. Vol. 19, n 3. Winter 1994-95.pp. 5-49.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539078

William C. Wohlforth The Stability of a Unipolar World. International

Security, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Summer, 1999), pp. 5-41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/
2539346
 2.4. EL REALISMO DEFENSIVO.

Jervis, Robert Security Regimes, International Organization, Vol. 36, No. 2

(Spring 1982), pp. 357378. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706526

Jervis, Robert. Realism, Neo-liberalism and Cooperation. International

Security, vol. 24, n 1. 1999. p. 42-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539347

Thomas J. Christensen. The Contemporary Security Dilemma: Deterring a

Taiwan Conflict. The Washington Quarterly. Autumn 2002.
http://www.twq.com/02autumn/christensen.pdf

2.5. EL REALISMO NEOCLSICO

Randall L. Schweller. Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State

Back In. International Security, Vol. 19, No. 1 (Summer, 1994), pp. 72-107.
www.jstor.org/stable/2539149

- Gideon Rose, Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy, World

Politics, Vol. 51, No. 1, 1998. pp. 144-172
http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/v051/51.1er_brown.html

3. EL LIBERALISMO.

3.1. NEOLIBERALISMO E INTERDEPENDENCIA COMPLEJA

Robert O Keohane; Joseph S Nye Jr. Power and interdependence in the

information age. Foreign Affairs. Vol.77, 5
http://academos.ro/sites/default/files/power_and_interdependence.pdf

3.2. INSTITUCIONALISMO NEOLIBERAL Y LA TEORA DE REGIMENES

- Kehoane, R. and Martin, L. The Promise of Institutionalist Theory.

International Security, vol. 20. 1995. pp. 39-51. http://www.jstor.org/stable/
2539214

Kehoane, R. International institutions: Can interdependence work? Foreign

Policy. Vol. 110. Spring 1998
http://www.columbia.edu/itc/sipa/S6800/courseworks/international_keohane.pdf

3.3. LA PAZ DEMOCRTICA.

Owen, J. How Liberalism produces Democratic Peace. International Security.

Vol. 19, n 2. Fall 1994. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539197

3.5. LOS LMITES DE LA COOPERACIN.

 Joseph M. Grieco . Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of
the Newest Liberal Institutionalism. International Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3
(Summer, 1988), pp. 485-507. www.jstor.org/stable/2706787

Stedman, S.J. UN transformation in an era of Soft Balancing. International

Affairs. Vol. 83, n 5. 2007.
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/117960054/issue

Bibliografa adicional.

- Schelling, T. The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard. (2nd Edition). 1980.

-Layne, C. Kant or Cant: the Myth of the Democratic Peace. International

Security. Vol. 19, n 2. Fall 1994. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539195

4. DECISION MAKING-TOMA DE DECISIONES.

4.1. La teora del Actor Racional (Rational Choice Theory, RCT) y sus
crticos: modelos burocrticos y variables psicolgicas.

Herrero, Ruben. La realidad inventada: percepcin, relaciones

internacionales y toma de decisin. Sistema. 173. Marzo 2003.

Jonathan Mercer. Rationality and Psychology in International Politics.

International Organization, Vol. 59, No. 1 (Winter, 2005), pp. 77-106
www.jstor.org/stable/3877879

4.2. La toma de decisiones en las crisis internacionales:

1. La crisis de los misiles en Cuba. Octubre 1962.- Trece Das
(2000).
Bernstein, Barton J. Understanding Decisionmaking, US Foreign Policy
and the Cuba Missiles Crises. International Security, No. 1 (Summer
2000), pp. 13464.http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2626776.pdf
2. La Guerra de Vietnam (1961-1975).
Herrero de Castro, Rubn. Kennedy y Vietnam. La cada de Camelot. Plaza y
Valds. Madrid. 2011.
3. Otras crisis: la Guerra del Golfo 1991, Libia 2011, Oriente Medio
(actual)

Bibliografa bsica.

Allison, Graham and Zelikow, Phillip. Essence of Decision: Explaining the

Cuban Missile Crisis, 2ed. Longman. 1999

Garcia Cantalapiedra, David. Perceptions on US Policy, Transatlantic Relations and

Alliance Security Dilemma, en Fernandez, N. and Smith, M. Perceptions and Policy
in Transatlantic Relations. Routledge. 2008.

Herrero de Castro, Rubn. La realidad inventada. Plaza y Valds. Madrid. 2006.

 Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics.
Princeton University Press, 1976.

4. EL REFLECTIVISMO Y LA TEORIA CRTICA DE LAS RELACIONES

INTERNACIONALES.

4.1. EL CONSTRUCTIVISMO MODERADO.

Ruggie, J. G. What makes the World hang together? Neo-utilitarism and Social
Constructivist Challenge, en Ruggie, J. Constructing the World Polity: Essays
of International Institutionalization. Routledge. London. 1998. pp. 1-40

Crtica contructivista al Realismo Estructural.

Wendt, A. Constructing International Politics. International Security. Vol. 30.
n1 1995. pp. 71-80. (Wendt on Mearsheimers False Promise )
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539217

Critca Neoliberal al Constructivismo.

Sterling- Folker, J. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism
and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compares. International Studies Quarterly.
Vol. 44. 2000. pp. 97-119.

5. LA ESCUELA INGLESA Y LA SOCIEDAD INTERNACIONAL.

Buzan, B. From International System to International Society: Structural

Realism and Regime Theory meet the English School. International
Organization n 47. Summer 1993. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706979

Devlen, B et al. The English School, International Relations, and Progress.

Internacional Studies Review, n 2, June 2005.
http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~ozgur/download/
07The%20English%20School,IR%20and%20Progress.pdf

6. FOREIGN POLICY ANALYSIS.

Garrison, Jean, Juliet Kaarbo, Douglas Foyle, Mark Schafer and Eric K. Stern.
2003. Foreign Policy Analysis in 20/20: A symposium. International Studies
Review. 5, 2: 155- 202. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3186402

Hudson, Valerie M. and Chris S. Vore. 1995. Foreign Policy

Analysis yesterday, today and Tomorrow. Mershon International
Studies Review. 39, 2: 209-238. http://bev.berkeley.edu/fp/readings/
ForeignPolicyAnalysisDomesticPolitics.pdf

7. LA ECONOMA POLTICA INTERNACIONAL

 Lake, D. Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked
Emperor or Tattered Monarch with Potential? International Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 37, No. 4, Dec., 1993. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841
BIBLIOGRAFA GENERAL.

Aldecoa Luzarraga, F. La integracin europea. Vol II. Tecnos. Madrid 2003.

Arenal, C. Introduccin a las relaciones internacionales. Tecnos. Madrid. 1990.

Baldwin, David. (ed) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: the Contemporary Debate.

Columbia, N.Y. 1994.

Barb, Esther. Relaciones Internacionales. Tecnos. 2 ed. 2003.

Bull, H. La Sociedad Anrquica. Libros de la Catarata. Madrid. 2004.

Buzan, Barry et al. The Logic of Anarchy. Neorealism to Structural Realism. Columbia,.
NY. 1993.

--------------- and Waever, O. Regions and Powers. The Structure of International

Security. CSIR. Cambridge. 2003.

Carr, Edward H. The Twenty Years Crisis 1919 1939. 2nd edition, London:
Macmillan, 1981[1939].

Deutsch, K. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area. Princeton. 1957.

Diez de Velasco, M. Las organizaciones internacionales. Tecnos. 13 Ed. UCM.

Madrid. 2003.

Garca Picazo, P. Las Relaciones Internacionales en el siglo XX. La contienda terica.

UNED. Madrid 1998.

Gilpin, R. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 1981.
------------.The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton Univ Press.
1987
Herrero de Castro, Rubn. La realidad inventada. Plaza y Valdes. Madrid. 2006.

Huntington, S. El choque de civilizaciones. Paidos. Barcelona. 1997.

Ikenberry, G. After Victory. Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after
Major Wars. Princeton. 2001.

Kant, I. Sobre la Paz Perpetua. Tecnos. Madrid. 1985.

Kehoane, R. and Nye, J. Power and Interdependence. HarperCollins, NY. 1989.

-----------------. After Hegemony. Princeton. 1984.

Kennedy, P. Parliament of Men. The Past, Present and Future of the United Nations.

Lebow, R. and Risse-Kappen, T. International Relations and the end of the Cold War.
Columbia. N.Y. 1992.

Mearsheimer, J. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Norton & Co. NY. 2001.

Mesa, R. La nueva sociedad internacional. Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.

Madrid 1992.

Morgenthau, H. Politics among Nations. Alfred Knopf. NY. 1978. Hans J. Morgenthau,
Politics among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace, 7th edition, London:
McGraw Hill, 2006 [1948].

Ruggie, John Gerard. Constructing the World Polity. Essays on International

Institutionalization. Routledge. London. 1996.

Sjolander, C. and Cox, W. Beyond Positivism. Critical Reflections on International

Relations. Lynne Rienner. London. 2003.

Strange, S. States and Markets. An Introduction to International Political

Economy, Pinter, Londres. 1988.

------------. The Retreat of the State. The Diffusion of the Power in the World Economy,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1996

Truyol, A. La sociedad internacional. Alianza. Madrid. 1993.

Walt, Stephen. The Origins of Alliances. Cornell, Ithaca. 1987.,

Waltz, K. Theory of International Politics. Random. NY. 1979.

Wendt. A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Cambridge. 1999.
SISTEMA DE TRABAJO.
Se realizar una explicacin en la primera clase de la semana. En la segunda sesin se
realizar un anlisis de las lecturas.

SISTEMA DE PUNTUACIN.
1. ASISTENCIA (10%)
2. EXAMEN FINAL. Hasta el 40% de la nota final. Exposiciones del profesor y
lecturas.
3. LECTURAS: hasta el 40% de la nota final. Hay lecturas obligatorias de cada
tema que se realizaran semanalmente. Se debern entregar los anlisis de dichas
lecturas de acuerdo con las fechas estipuladas durante el curso. La entrega
de dichas lecturas son obligatorias para poderse presentar al examen final.
Voluntariamente, se podrn realizar presentaciones de las lecturas, que podrn
aumentar la nota un 20%. Estas presentaciones se realizaran en clase, y se
podrn realizar preguntas por parte del profesor y los alumnos.
4. DEBATES Y CONFERENCIAS. Hasta el 10% de la nota. Se realizarn una
serie de debates sobre los temas del programa, ilustrados a veces con pelculas o
documentales. Tambin se invitar a algunos conferenciantes para hablar sobre
temas monogrficos relacionados con el programa. La no asistencia sin causa
justificada resultar en la perdida del 10% de la nota estipulado en esta seccin.
5. MEJORA DE CALIFICACIONES. Los alumnos invitados a ello por el profesor
pueden AUMENTAR su calificacin realizando trabajos sobre cualquier tema,
que entregaran el da del examen final o posteriormente de acuerdo con el
profesor.
Sin embargo esta mejora en la calificacin, solo y siempre, se podr realizar
HABIENDO APROBADO LA ASIGNATURA.